STOCK TITAN

Aclarion Broadens CLARITY Trial Enrollment Criteria to Accelerate Enrollment

Local review-board approval remains pending at two active sites, while the company expects the overall trial duration to remain unchanged.

(Moderate)

Sentiment and the balance of points

Rhea-AI Sentiment reads the wording of the document, how positive or negative its language is on a 1 to 5 scale. The balance of points shown with the takes weighs what the document actually discloses, so the two can disagree, for example when a trial that missed its main goal is described in upbeat language.

Tags

Aclarion (ACON) broadened enrollment criteria for its pivotal CLARITY clinical trial after enrollment failed to support an initial Q4 2026 readout. Institutional Review Boards, which oversee clinical research, have fully approved the revised criteria at 9 of 11 active sites. The other two sites are using them for screening before local approval. Newly added sites, including NYU and the most recently activated center, will also use the revised criteria.

The approval process temporarily slowed enrollment while sites paused screening under the prior criteria. Aclarion expects the changes to expand patient eligibility and accelerate enrollment without extending the overall trial duration. Based on current enrollment and the required three-month postoperative follow-up, the company plans to update enrollment levels and anticipated initial-readout timing by year-end. Operational measures implemented over the past nine months had not increased enrollment sufficiently.

Loading...
Loading translation...
4 points · 0 major

How this balance works

Rhea-AI gives every point it takes from this document a weight. Minor counts 1, Moderate 3 and Major 9, so one Major point outweighs several Minor ones. The bar adds up the weights on each side, and when neither side holds more than 65% of the total the balance reads Mixed.

It reads the document as published, with the same rules for every company, and it does not look at what the market expected or at how the stock traded, so a point can be objectively good on a day the stock falls.

Rhea-AI Sentiment measures something else, the tone of the wording.

0 major · 3 points

Hollow bars mark forward-looking points. How the balance works

Positive

  • Moderate point. Forward-looking: it has not happened yet and may not happen.Broader criteria are expected to expand eligibility and accelerate enrollment, Aclarion says.
  • Moderate point. Forward-looking: it has not happened yet and may not happen.Overall CLARITY completion remains within the originally anticipated timeline, Aclarion expects.
  • Minor pointRevised CLARITY criteria have full review-board approval at 9 of 11 active sites.
  • Minor point. Forward-looking: it has not happened yet and may not happen.Revised criteria are expected to improve study-population representativeness, Aclarion says.

Negative

  • Moderate pointEnrollment did not increase enough to support a Q4 2026 initial readout.
  • Minor pointLocal review-board approval remains pending at two active sites already using revised criteria for screening.
  • Minor pointReview-board approval temporarily slowed enrollment as sites paused screening under prior criteria.

Key Figures

Sites with revised-criteria approval: 9 of 11 active sites Sites screening before local approval: 2 active sites Prior initial-readout target: Q4 2026 +2 more
Sites with revised-criteria approval
9 of 11 active sites
CLARITY enrollment criteria approved by Institutional Review Boards
Sites screening before local approval
2 active sites
Using revised criteria for screening prior to local IRB approval
Prior initial-readout target
Q4 2026
Enrollment did not increase at the pace required to support this timing
Timeline update
By year-end
Update on enrollment levels and anticipated initial-readout timing
Postoperative follow-up
Three months
Required follow-up period cited in assessing initial-readout timing

Historical Context

1 past event · Latest: Aug 20
1 event
  1. Aug 20

    Trial timeline

    24h Move
    -3.6%

    Added a CLARITY site and anticipated an initial readout in Q4 2026.

24h Move is the share-price change in the day after each event; other market factors may also have contributed.

Key Terms

institutional review boards, saas, biomarkers
3 terms
institutional review boards regulatory
"approved by the Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) at 9 of 11 active CLARITY sites"
A board of independent experts who review and approve medical or human-subject research to protect participants’ safety, rights and welfare; they check study plans, consent forms and safety measures before trials begin and while they run. For investors, an IRB’s approval or concerns can affect how quickly a study starts, whether results are accepted by regulators and the reputational or regulatory risk to a company—like a safety inspection that can speed up or delay a product launch.
saas technical
"The first evidence-supported SaaS platform to noninvasively help physicians"
SaaS, or Software as a Service, is a way of delivering computer programs over the internet, allowing users to access and use them through a web browser without needing to install or maintain the software themselves. For investors, it highlights a business model where companies generate recurring revenue by providing ongoing access to their software, often leading to predictable income and growth potential.
biomarkers medical
"Nociscan objectively quantifies chemical biomarkers demonstrated to be associated with disc pain"
Biomarkers are measurable indicators found in the body, such as substances in blood or tissues, that reveal information about health or disease. For investors, they can signal how well a medical treatment is working or whether a disease is developing, helping to assess the potential success or risks of healthcare companies or innovations. Think of biomarkers as biological signals that provide clues about a person’s health status.

AI-generated analysis. How Rhea-AI works. Not financial advice.

See more from StockTitan in Google Search and AI answers. Adds StockTitan as a preferred source · opens Google
Add on Google
  • New criteria fully approved at nine of eleven active sites expected to significantly accelerate enrollment pace
  • Initial readout timing to be updated by year-end based on demonstrated Q4 enrollment increases
  • Overall trial duration remains on track

BROOMFIELD, Colo., Oct. 08, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Aclarion, Inc., (“Aclarion” or the “Company”) (Nasdaq: ACON, ACONW), a healthcare technology company that is leveraging biomarkers and proprietary augmented intelligence (AI) algorithms to help physicians identify the location of chronic low back pain, today announced an update to the enrollment criteria and expected timing of the initial readout from its pivotal CLARITY clinical trial. Based on current enrollment levels and the required three-month postoperative follow-up period, Aclarion will provide an update on enrollment levels and anticipated timeline for the initial readout by year-end.

The Company emphasizes that this timing update does not change the overall expected duration of the CLARITY trial at this time.

Enrollment and Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria

CLARITY was intentionally designed with highly optimized inclusion and exclusion criteria to remove confounding factors that have historically complicated chronic low back pain studies. These criteria strengthened the scientific rigor of the trial but significantly narrowed the pool of eligible patients at participating sites.

Over the past nine months, Aclarion implemented multiple operational measures to accelerate enrollment without altering the criteria, including:

  • Increasing site level engagement and training
  • Enhancing patient identification workflows
  • Adding dedicated internal study coordination resources
  • Expanding outreach to referring physicians
  • Improving communication pathways between radiology and surgical teams

Despite these efforts, enrollment did not increase at the pace required to support a Q4 2026 initial readout.

Revised Criteria to Reflect Real World Chronic Low Back Pain

Recognizing that the optimized criteria were excluding a substantial portion of real world chronic low back pain patients, Aclarion undertook a comprehensive review of the inclusion/exclusion framework in partnership with the primary investigator and lead surgeon researchers at each enrollment site. The Company subsequently implemented revised criteria that:

  • Maintain scientific rigor
  • Better reflect the clinical reality of chronic low back pain
  • Expand the pool of eligible patients
  • Improve alignment with how Nociscan is used in everyday practice

These revised criteria have now been fully approved by the Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) at 9 of 11 active CLARITY sites, with the other 2 active sites using revised criteria for screening prior to local IRB approval. The revised criteria will be used at all newly added sites, including NYU and the most recent center activated for enrollment.

Overall Length of the CLARITY Trial Remains on Track

The IRB approval process temporarily slowed enrollment as sites paused screening under the prior criteria. With approvals now complete, Aclarion expects meaningful acceleration in enrollment going forward.

Importantly, the Company does not anticipate that this adjustment will extend the overall length of the CLARITY trial. The revised criteria are expected to:

  • Increase the number of eligible patients
  • Improve enrollment consistency across sites
  • Enhance the representativeness of the study population
  • Strengthen the real-world applicability of the eventual study results

With the pace of enrollment expected to increase under the revised criteria, Aclarion believes the trial remains on track to complete within its originally anticipated timeline.

Brent Ness, Aclarion CEO said, “CLARITY is designed to deliver the highest level of scientific rigor, and that required us to begin the study with very narrow inclusion criteria. As we gained real-world insight into patient flow across our sites, we needed to adjust those criteria to better reflect the chronic low back pain population surgeons actually treat. With IRB approvals now complete at nearly all active sites, we expect enrollment to accelerate meaningfully. We remain focused on enrollment and look forward to providing an update by year end with timing for the initial readout. Importantly, our confidence in the overall timeline remains on track with the importance of CLARITY demonstrating Nociscan’s clinical value.”

Chronic low back pain is a global healthcare problem with approximately 266 million people worldwide suffering from degenerative spine disease and low back pain. Aclarion’s Nociscan solution is the first evidence-supported SaaS platform to noninvasively help physicians distinguish between painful and nonpainful discs in the lumbar spine. Nociscan objectively quantifies chemical biomarkers demonstrated to be associated with disc pain. When used with other diagnostic tools, Nociscan provides critical insights into the location of a patient’s low back pain and demonstrates a 97% surgical success rate when all Nociscan-positive discs are treated.

For more information about CLARITY, please visit: CLARITY Trial

To find a Nociscan center, view our site map here.

For more information on Nociscan, please email: info@aclarion.com

About Aclarion, Inc.

Aclarion is a healthcare technology company that leverages Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (“MRS”), proprietary signal processing techniques, biomarkers, and augmented intelligence algorithms to optimize clinical treatments. The Company is first addressing the chronic low back pain market with Nociscan, the first, evidence-supported, SaaS platform to noninvasively help physicians distinguish between painful and nonpainful discs in the lumbar spine. Through a cloud connection, Nociscan receives magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) data from an MRI machine for each lumbar disc being evaluated. In the cloud, proprietary signal processing techniques extract and quantify chemical biomarkers demonstrated to be associated with disc pain. Biomarker data is entered into proprietary algorithms to indicate if a disc may be a source of pain. When used with other diagnostic tools, Nociscan provides critical insights into the location of a patient’s low back pain, giving physicians clarity to optimize treatment strategies.  For more information, please visit www.aclarion.com.

Forward Looking Statements

This press release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 about the Company’s current expectations about future results, performance, prospects and opportunities. Statements that are not historical facts, such as “anticipates,” “believes” and “expects” or similar expressions, are forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are based on the current plans and expectations of management and are subject to a number of uncertainties and risks that could significantly affect the Company’s current plans and expectations, as well as future results of operations and financial condition. Forward-looking statements in this release include, among others, statements regarding that we will provide an update on enrollment levels and anticipated timeline for the initial readout by year-end, the expectation that we will significantly accelerate enrollment of patients in our ongoing clinical trial, that the overall duration of the CLARITY Trial Remains on Track and that the Company does not anticipate that this initial readout adjustment will extend the overall length of the CLARITY trial, that the revised criteria are expected to: increase the number of eligible patients; improve enrollment consistency across sites; enhance the representativeness of the study population and; strengthen the real-world applicability of the eventual study results; with the pace of enrollment expected to increase under the revised criteria, and, the continued expansion of the CLARITY trial to generate the high-quality evidence needed to advance Nociscan. These and other risks and uncertainties are discussed more fully in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Readers are encouraged to review the section titled “Risk Factors” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025, as well as other disclosures contained in the Prospectus and subsequent filings made with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Forward-looking statements contained in this announcement are made as of this date and the Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

Investor Contacts:

Kirin M. Smith
PCG Advisory, Inc.
ksmith@pcgadvisory.com

Media Contacts:

Jennie Kim
SPRIG Consulting
jennie@sprigconsulting.com


FAQ

AI-generated questions and answers. How Rhea-AI works. Not financial advice.

When will Aclarion update the CLARITY trial's initial readout timeline?

Aclarion plans to update enrollment levels and anticipated initial-readout timing by year-end. The timing assessment reflects current enrollment and the required three-month postoperative follow-up period; enrollment had not increased sufficiently to support a Q4 2026 initial readout.

Why did Aclarion broaden the CLARITY trial enrollment criteria?

Aclarion says the original criteria excluded a substantial portion of real-world chronic low back pain patients. The revised framework followed a review with the primary investigator and lead surgeon researchers at each enrollment site, with the aim of expanding eligibility while maintaining scientific rigor.

What did Aclarion do to improve CLARITY enrollment before changing the criteria?

Over the past nine months, Aclarion increased site engagement and training, improved patient identification workflows, added internal study coordination resources, expanded referring-physician outreach and improved communication between radiology and surgical teams. These measures did not alter the enrollment criteria.

Keep reading