InterDigital awarded injunction against Disney by German court
InterDigital (Nasdaq: IDCC) said a German court (Munich Regional Court) awarded it an injunction against Disney over infringement of an InterDigital patent related to HDR streaming.
The company noted Disney can appeal the Munich decision. The judgment follows a separate Munich ruling awarding an injunction for a patent covering a method to dynamically overlay one video stream with another, and a preliminary injunction in Brazil finding Disney infringed both patents-in-suit.
InterDigital emphasized the rulings as examples of alleged unlicensed use of its video technology and said Disney should pay fair value for that technology.
InterDigital (Nasdaq: IDCC) ha detto che un tribunale tedesco (Tribunale Regionale di Monaco) gli ha imposto un’ingiunzione contro Disney per violazione di un brevetto InterDigital relativo a HDR streaming.
La società ha osservato che Disney può fare appello contro la decisione di Monaco. Il verdetto segue una separata pronuncia di Monaco che ha imposto un’ingiunzione su un brevetto che copre un metodo per sovrapporre dinamicamente un flusso video con un altro, e una ingiunzione preliminare in Brasile che ha accertato che Disney ha violato entrambi i brevetti in questione.
InterDigital ha enfatizzato le pronunce come esempi di presunto uso non autorizzato della sua tecnologia video e ha detto che Disney dovrebbe pagare un valore equo per tale tecnologia.
InterDigital (Nasdaq: IDCC) indicó que un tribunal alemán (Tribunal Regional de Múnich) le concedió una medida cautelar contra Disney por infracción de una patente de InterDigital relacionada con HDR streaming.
La compañía señaló que Disney puede apelar la decisión de Múnich. El fallo sigue a una sentencia separada de Múnich que concedió una medida cautelar para una patente que cubre un método para sovrerponer dinámicamente un flujo de video con otro, y una medida cautelar preliminar en Brasil que encontró que Disney infringió ambas patentes en cuestión.
InterDigital subrayó las fallos como ejemplos de presunto uso no autorizado de su tecnología de video y dijo que Disney debería pagar un valor justo por esa tecnología.
InterDigital (나스닥: IDCC)은 독일 법원(뮌헨 지역 법원)이 디즈니의 특허 침해에 대해 HDR 스트리밍과 관련된 InterDigital 특허를 금지하는 명령을 내렸다고 말했다.
회사는 또한 디즈니가 뮌헨 판결에 항소할 수 있다고 지적했다. 이 판결은 비디오 스트림 하나를 다른 스트림 위에 동적으로 오버레이하는 방법을 다루는 특허에 대해 금지 명령을 내린 뮌헨의 별도 판결과, 브라질에서의 예비 금지 명령이 내려져 디즈니가 두 특허를 모두 침해했다는 사실을 확인했다는 점을 따라왔다.
InterDigital은 이러한 판결들을 회사의 비디오 기술이 무단으로 사용되었다는 사례로 강조하면서, 디즈니가 해당 기술에 대해 공정한 가치를 지불해야 한다고 말했다.
InterDigital (Nasdaq: IDCC) a déclaré qu'un tribunal allemand (cour régionale de Munich) lui a accordé une injonction contre Disney pour violation d'un brevet d'InterDigital lié au HDR streaming.
La société a noté que Disney peut faire appel de la décision de Munich. Le jugement suit une autre décision de Munich accordant une injonction pour un brevet couvrant une méthode pour superposer dynamiquement un flux vidéo sur un autre, et une injonction préliminaire au Brésil qui a constaté que Disney avait violé les deux brevets en question.
InterDigital a souligné ces décisions comme des exemples d'une utilisation présumée non autorisée de sa technologie vidéo et a déclaré que Disney devrait payer une juste valeur pour cette technologie.
InterDigital (Nasdaq: IDCC) sagte, ein deutsches Gericht (Landgericht München) habe ihr eine einstweilige Verfügung gegen Disney wegen Verletzung eines InterDigital-Patents im Zusammenhang mit HDR-Streaming zugesprochen.
Das Unternehmen merkte an, dass Disney gegen die Entscheidung von München Berufung einlegen kann. Das Urteil folgt einer separaten Entscheidung des Landgerichts München, die eine einstweilige Verfügung für ein Patent erteilte, das eine Methode abdeckt, um einen Video-Stream dynamisch über einen anderen zu legen, und einer vorläufigen Verfügung in Brasilien, die festgestellt hat, dass Disney beide Patente in der Sache verletzt hat.
InterDigital hob die Entscheidungen als Beispiele für angeblich unlizenzierte Nutzung ihrer Videotechnologie hervor und sagte, Disney solle einen fairen Wert für diese Technologie zahlen.
InterDigital (نقطة التداول: IDCC) قالت محكمة ألمانية (محكمة ميونيخ الإقليمية) إنها منحت أمراً باستصدار أمر قضائي ضد ديزني لانتهاكها براءة اختراع InterDigital المرتبطة بـ تدفق HDR.
وأشارت الشركة إلى أن Disney يمكنها استئناف حكم ميونيخ. يَتْبَع الحكم حكمٌ منفصل من ميونيخ بمنح أمرًا بوقف لبِرَاءةٍ تتعلق بطريقة لإسقاط ديناميكياً تدفقاً فيديوياً على تدفق آخر، وأمر مؤقت في البرازيل وجد أن Disney قد انتهكت كلا البراءتين المعنيتين.
وأكدت InterDigital أن هذه القرارات والعهد بها أمثلة على الاستخدام غير المرخّص لتقنيتها للفيديو، وقالت إن Disney يجب أن تدفع قيمة عادلة مقابل تلك التقنية.
- Munich Regional Court awarded injunction over HDR streaming patent
- Separate Munich injunction for dynamic video-overlay patent
- Brazil court granted a preliminary injunction in InterDigital’s favor
- Disney can appeal the Munich injunction
- Ongoing litigation across multiple jurisdictions remains unresolved
WILMINGTON, Del., Nov. 24, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- InterDigital, Inc. (Nasdaq: IDCC), a mobile, video and AI technology research and development company, today announced it has been awarded another injunction against Disney by a court in Germany.
The Munich Regional Court ruled that InterDigital is entitled to an injunction over Disney’s infringement of an InterDigital patent related to the streaming of video content using high dynamic range (HDR) technology. Disney can appeal the decision.
The judgment from the Munich court follows a separate decision from the same court to award InterDigital an injunction over Disney’s infringement of a patent which enables a method for dynamically overlaying a first video stream with a second video stream. It also follows a decision by a court in Brazil, to grant a preliminary injunction in InterDigital’s favor, after the court found that Disney infringed both of the InterDigital patents-in-suit.
“This decision is another example of how Disney continues to use our technology and infringe our intellectual property without a license, for free,” said Josh Schmidt, Chief Legal Officer, InterDigital. “The patents in our lawsuits against Disney highlight the breadth of our video research from the efficient compression and delivery of video content to enabling the kind of visual experience that was once reserved for movie theaters. Disney should now pay fair value for technology that is key to its streaming success.”
About InterDigital®
InterDigital is a global research and development company focused primarily on wireless, video, artificial intelligence (“AI”), and related technologies. We design and develop foundational technologies that enable connected, immersive experiences in a broad range of communications and entertainment products and services. We license our innovations worldwide to companies providing such products and services, including makers of wireless communications devices, consumer electronics, IoT devices, cars and other motor vehicles, and providers of cloud-based services such as video streaming. As a leader in wireless technology, our engineers have designed and developed a wide range of innovations that are used in wireless products and networks, from the earliest digital cellular systems to 5G and today’s most advanced Wi-Fi technologies. We are also a leader in video processing and video encoding/decoding technology, with a significant AI research effort that intersects with both wireless and video technologies. Founded in 1972, InterDigital is listed on Nasdaq.
InterDigital is a registered trademark of InterDigital, Inc.
For more information, visit: www.interdigital.com.
InterDigital Contact:
Richard Lloyd
Email: richard.lloyd@interdigital.com
+1 (202) 349-1716
FAQ
What did InterDigital announce about the Munich court ruling on Nov 24, 2025 for IDCC?
Can Disney appeal the Munich injunction awarded to InterDigital (IDCC)?
How does the Nov 24, 2025 Munich decision relate to earlier rulings involving InterDigital (IDCC)?
Which InterDigital patent did the German court find Disney infringed in the Nov 24, 2025 ruling?
Does the announcement indicate a final global resolution between InterDigital (IDCC) and Disney?
What did InterDigital's chief legal officer say about the rulings on Nov 24, 2025?
