DOMA PERPETUAL CAPITAL MANAGEMENT QUESTIONS WHY SHAREHOLDERS SHOULD VOTE TO CONTINUE WITH A BOARD THAT HAS OVERSEEN A DECADE OF VALUE DESTRUCTION
Rhea-AI Summary
AI-generated analysis. Not financial advice.
Positive
- None.
Negative
- None.
Key Figures
Market Reality Check
Peers on Argus
PCRX was down 1.31% while key peers showed mixed, modest moves (e.g., COLL -0.68%, AMPH -1.01%, DVAX +0.06%). Momentum scanner only flagged BGM at -5.02%, suggesting PCRX trading reflected company-specific governance and IP concerns rather than a broad sector move.
Historical Context
| Date | Event | Sentiment | Move | Catalyst |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 27 | Clinical outcomes data | Positive | -1.3% | Real-world EXPAREL study showing reduced opioid use and healthcare costs. |
| May 26 | Company rebuttal | Neutral | +4.3% | Pacira response disputing DOMA’s statements on its IP strategy. |
| May 21 | Activist shareholder letter | Negative | +2.1% | DOMA letter criticizing performance and pushing for board change. |
| May 20 | Activist nominees | Negative | +0.5% | DOMA nominees seeking support via WHITE proxy card and critiquing oversight. |
| May 20 | Investor presentation | Positive | +0.5% | Pacira presentation emphasizing revenue, margins, EXPAREL settlement and pipeline. |
Recent Pacira headlines tied to the DOMA proxy contest and company responses have generally seen modestly positive or mixed price reactions, while even favorable clinical data for EXPAREL drew a negative move.
Over the last several days, Pacira news has centered on the proxy contest with DOMA and the company’s strategic defense. On May 20, Pacira highlighted 2025 revenue of $726.4M, strong gross margin, share repurchases, and pipeline progress, while DOMA’s director nominees and subsequent letters emphasized underperformance and EXPAREL litigation risk. A May 27 real-world EXPAREL study still coincided with a -1.31% move, framing today’s escalated activist critique against a backdrop of contested strategy and governance.
Market Pulse Summary
This announcement intensifies an ongoing proxy contest, emphasizing Pacira’s long-term share price underperformance, EXPAREL’s dominance in the revenue mix, and litigation risks around generics. Recent filings and presentations show competing narratives between management and DOMA. Investors watching this situation typically track voting outcomes at the June 9, 2026 meeting, developments in patent disputes, and any shifts in capital allocation or board composition that emerge from the campaign.
Key Terms
proxy statement regulatory
white proxy card financial
forward-looking statements regulatory
AI-generated analysis. Not financial advice.
PACIRA'S STOCK PRICE IS DOWN FOR EVERY RECENT PERIOD: 10 YEAR, 5 YEAR, 3 YEAR, 2 YEAR, ONE YEAR, AND YEAR-TO-DATE
DOMA BELIEVES MANAGEMENT IS MISLEADING STAKEHOLDERS REGARDING ITS PATENT PROTECTION AND MINIMIZING THE POTENTIAL BUSINESS-DESTROYING CONSEQUENCES OF ANOTHER LEGAL LOSS, CONSTITUTING GROSS NEGLIGENCE
DOMA CONTENDS THE BOARD IS REFUSING TO EXPLORE A SALE BECAUSE DIRECTORS DO NOT WANT TO LOSE THEIR JOBS, PUTTING THEIR INTERESTS AHEAD OF SHAREHOLDERS
While the Company has repeatedly highlighted the strength of its patent portfolio and related protections, the market's response is a clear indication that investors remain unconvinced. This disconnect is further reflected in the Company's share price, which has declined across virtually every meaningful historical measurement period. Over this same period, Management and the Board have compensated themselves generously, removing performance-based guardrails for compensation in favor of payouts with less correlation to business results or value creation.
Period | Total Shareholder Return (price-only)1 |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | |
Year-to-Date (YTD) | -10 % |
1-Year Return | - 9 % |
2-Year Return | -21 % |
Since Frank Lee as CEO2 | -27 % |
3-Year Return | -41 % |
5-Year Return | -65 % |
10-Year Return | -46 % |
We believe the Company continues to mislead investors regarding the threat posed by generics, mischaracterizing the Fresenius Kabi settlement as a wholly positive development for stakeholders and misrepresenting the actual protections offered by current patents. In our view, Management was unprepared for its first patent defeat in the lower court, as reflected in Pacira's Q2 2024 earnings call, when the Company's Chief Legal and Compliance Officer, Anthony Molloy III, stated:
"[the '495 patent] is only the first patent being litigated. Three additional infringement lawsuits are underway for our 348, 574, 575 and 706 patents, and these patents are broader than the '495 patent. We also have other patents that are forthcoming, many of which will be listed in the Orange Books with expiration dates through January 2041. In order to become commercially successful, eVenus would have to overcome all of our patents."
Days later, the Court ruled against Pacira with respect to the '495 patent. Following that adverse ruling, the Company entered into a settlement that conceded hundreds of millions of dollars of EXPAREL's future revenue stream, despite prior assertions that any generic competitor "would have to overcome all of our patents" to threaten EXPAREL's position in the market.
The Company appears to lack any coherent risk management strategy. We believe Management continues to mislead investors about the expiration of key product patents and the potential impact of challenges to the manufacturing patents by additional generic entrants. If further generic competition emerges and the Company is forced to concede an even greater share of EXPAREL revenues — which currently account for approximately
A larger company with more resources and other profitable products is better suited to fight off any threat posed by generic versions. Such company's stock price would not be decimated by a single adverse ruling in a lower court and it could maintain the fight through a lengthy appeals process without the need to settle. Such a company would also maintain advantages via larger distribution, branding, marketing spend, penetration throughout the entire U.S. market and the capacity to grow EXPAREL much faster than Pacira currently can. Further, a larger company can value the business on gross profit because after acquiring Pacira it will be able to synergistically reduce the costs and expenses associated with the production, sale and distribution of EXPAREL. We believe this may explain why the Board and Management refuse to consider a path that could offer the strongest protection and create maximum shareholder value; a sale will likely cost them their jobs. We are not advocating a "fire sale," but a disciplined process to test market value. A potential sale may prove to be the best way to regain certainty and shareholder return.
Pacira's stakeholders are the ones who have suffered as Management and the Board enriched themselves despite overseeing massive and persistent underperformance. Shareholders should be in control of the business they own. They should be the ones to vote and decide whether the price the Company finds in the market is adequate or not.
The Company's stakeholders should not accept continued underperformance from a Board and Management team that cannot be counted on to represent shareholders' interests. In our view, the failure to adequately explore strategic alternatives continues to negatively affect stakeholders and imperils the business, constituting gross negligence and a failure of the Duty of Care. Shareholders deserve new leadership that is willing to proactively evaluate all available options to protect the business and maximize shareholder value.
We strongly urge all shareholders that support our mission to install new voices and perspectives in the Pacira Boardroom to vote FOR all three DOMA nominees, Christopher Dennis, MD, MBA, FAPA, Oliver Benton "Ben" Curtis III, and Eric de Armas, using the WHITE proxy card in advance of the June 9, 2026, annual meeting.
Contact:
DOMA Perpetual Capital Management LLC
ir@domaperpetual.com
or
MacKenzie Partners, Inc.
Bob Marese
bmarese@mackenziepartners.com
CERTAIN INFORMATION CONCERNING THE PARTICIPANTS
DOMA Perpetual Capital Management LLC, a
DOMA STRONGLY ADVISES ALL STOCKHOLDERS OF THE COMPANY TO READ THE PROXY STATEMENT AND OTHER PROXY MATERIALS BECAUSE THEY CONTAIN IMPORTANT INFORMATION. SUCH PROXY MATERIALS ARE AVAILABLE AT NO CHARGE ON THE SEC'S WEB SITE AT HTTP://WWW.SEC.GOV. IN ADDITION, THE PARTICIPANTS IN THIS PROXY SOLICITATION WILL PROVIDE COPIES OF THE PROXY STATEMENT WITHOUT CHARGE, WHEN AVAILABLE, UPON REQUEST. REQUESTS FOR COPIES SHOULD BE DIRECTED TO THE PARTICIPANTS' PROXY SOLICITOR.
The participants in the proxy solicitation are DOMA, DOMA1 LLC, a
As of the date hereof, DOMA LO Master directly beneficially owns 1,965,775 shares of Common Stock, par value
Disclaimer
This press release and the attached letter have been prepared by DOMA. The views expressed herein reflect the opinions of DOMA and are based on publicly available information with respect to Pacira BioSciences, Inc. ("Pacira" or the "Company"). DOMA recognizes that there may be confidential information in the possession of the Company that could lead it or others to disagree with DOMA's conclusions. DOMA reserves the right to change or modify any such views or opinions at any time and for any reason and expressly disclaims any obligation to correct, update, or revise the information contained herein or to otherwise provide any additional materials.
For the avoidance of doubt, this press release was not produced by any person that is affiliated with Pacira, nor was its content endorsed by Pacira. This press release is provided merely as information and is not intended to be, nor should it be construed as, an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any security nor as a recommendation to purchase or sell any security. One or more funds managed by DOMA currently beneficially own shares of the Company.
Some of the materials in this press release contain forward-looking statements. All statements contained herein that are not clearly historical in nature or that necessarily depend on future events are forward-looking, and the words "anticipate," "believe," "expect," "potential," "could," "opportunity," "estimate," "plan," "once again," "achieve," and similar expressions are generally intended to identify forward-looking statements. The projected results and statements contained herein that are not historical facts are based on DOMA's current expectations, speak only as of the date of these materials and involve risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual results, performances or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performances or achievements expressed or implied by such projected results and statements. Assumptions relating to the foregoing involve judgments with respect to, among other things, future economic, competitive and market conditions and future business decisions, all of which are difficult or impossible to predict accurately and many of which are beyond the control of DOMA.
1 Stock price as of the close on May 22, 2026 (source: Bloomberg)
2 Frank Lee was appointed CEO of Pacira on January 2, 2024
i DOMA is acting as investment manager with respect to the shares beneficially owned by JTF, over which DOMA exercises discretionary investment and voting authority. JTF is not making or sponsoring the director nominations.
View original content to download multimedia:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/doma-perpetual-capital-management-questions-why-shareholders-should-vote-to-continue-with-a-board-that-has-overseen-a-decade-of-value-destruction-302784518.html
SOURCE DOMA Perpetual