Paragon Technologies Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Responds to Open Letter by Sham Gad
Rhea-AI Summary
Paragon Technologies (OTC PINK:PGNT) Nominating Committee has responded to former CEO Sham Gad's open letter, challenging his claims about company performance. The committee alleges that Gad presented misleading information by selectively choosing dates to enhance his performance metrics.
The committee disputes several of Gad's claims, including:
- The reported $17 million in net profits (2017-2023) omits $2 million in losses from 2013-2016 and includes $4.2 million from non-economic purchase gain accounting
- Shareholders' equity growth claims exclude poor performance periods and incorrectly include non-controlling interests
- The actual shareholders' equity CAGR during Gad's tenure was 11.3% (including purchase gain) or 8.9% (excluding gain), roughly half of his claimed 20.4%
- Stock price performance under Gad's chairmanship (7.7% CAGR) underperformed major indices like NASDAQ (14.6%) and S&P500 (13.4%)
Positive
- None.
Negative
- Former CEO's tenure showed underperformance compared to major market indices (7.7% CAGR vs. NASDAQ's 14.6%)
- $2 million in losses from 2013-2016 period
- Stock price declined from $9.00 to $6.90 by the time of CEO's removal
- Activist strategy reportedly cost shareholders millions
- Alleged misuse of corporate resources for activist fights with costs exceeding stock purchase amounts
News Market Reaction
On the day this news was published, PGNT declined 5.44%, reflecting a notable negative market reaction.
Data tracked by StockTitan Argus on the day of publication.
EASTON, PA / ACCESS Newswire / February 18, 2025 / The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of Paragon Technologies (OTC PINK:PGNT), consisting of three recently appointed independent directors, is responding to the open letter by Sham Gad, director and former CEO of Paragon, released on February 11, 2025.
In his open letter, Mr. Gad alleges that there has been "inaccurate and misleading information" coming from the Company and then proceeds to tell shareholders inaccurate and misleading information by cherry picking starting and ending dates in order to make his performance as CEO and Chairman appear better than it was. Mr. Gad conveniently selects only financial information for calendar year 2017 to the end of 2023, and stock price information only from the end of 2016 though the end of 2023. Yet Mr. Gad became Chairman on March 16, 2012, and CEO on May 20, 2014, and was not terminated as CEO until August 9, 2024. Why did Mr. Gad use different, or inaccurate, starting and ending dates? We can only assume it was done to mislead shareholders.
Below is what Mr. Gad claims (shown in red italics) in his open letter, versus the truth.
Mr. Gad said Paragon has "Earned in aggregate over
$17 million in net profits for stockholders from 2017 to 2023." What he doesn't tell you is the time period he chose only includes part of his tenure, and excludes the$2 million of losses from 2013 to 2016, nor does it note that of the$17 million in net profits, over$4.2 million was from purchase gain accounting, which is non-economic.Mr. Gad said Paragon has "Grown shareholders' equity from
$2.8 million to over$22 million , or a compound annual rate of approximately20.4% from the end of 2016 through the end of 2023. " What he doesn't mention is the period from March 2012 through 2016, where equity declined from$4.9 million to$2.8 million , nor that he is including the non-controlling interest, which is not attributable to shareholders, or that he includes the acquisition purchase gain. Mr. Gad apparently struggles with math, since his cherry picked time period CAGR would actually be34.7% , but that is irrelevant because it is based on pure fantasy. As we said, it cherry picks starting and end points, includes the benefit of purchase gain, and includes NCI (non-controlling interest) which is not attributable to shareholders. Over Mr. Gad's tenure as Chairman from March 31, 2012 through June 30, 2024, the actual shareholders' equity CAGR attributable to common shareholders is11.3% , including the purchase gain and8.9% excluding the gain. In other words, results are about half of what Mr. Gad claims.[i]Mr. Gad said Paragon has "Increased book value per share from
$1.66 t o$13.04 , a CAGR of approximately20.4% . " Once again, Mr. Gad uses the same cherry-picked dates to make his performance look better than it was. He excludes his first four years as Chairman and two and a half years as CEO and stops the clock at the end of 2023, eight months before his removal. If you can count stats based on starting and stopping the clock when you want, Bronny James could be an All Star. Once again, Mr. Gad's math is way off. He did get the share prices correct though. The seven-year CAGR would be34.3% but it is also pure baloney. As noted before, it includes the benefit of purchase gain accounting, which is non-economic, and includes non-controlling interest, which is not attributable to common shareholders. His full tenure as Chairman, 12.25 years, results in a book value per share CAGR of11.8% including purchase gain and NCI,10.3% excluding NCI, and only8.0% excluding the purchase gain and NCI. [ii] In other words, results are about half of what Mr. Gad claims.Mr. Gad said Paragon has "Increased its stock price from
$1.20 t o$9.00 , a CAGR of approximately 33.5 %." Mr. Gad got the math right on this one. Of course the timeframe is still all cherry picked. By the time of his removal as CEO on August 9, 2024, the price had fallen to$6.90 per share. If we use Mr. Gad's full tenure as Chairman, 12.35 years, the share price CAGR is7.7% (using$2.75 per share price on March 31, 2012 and the$6.90 closing price on August 9, 2024). How does that compare to major indices? The NASDAQ rose14.6% CAGR, S&P500 (SPY)13.4% with dividends, and the Russell 2000 compounded at9.2% over the same time period. In other words, results are about a quarter of what Mr. Gad claims.Mr. Gad said Paragon "Began investing excess cash in risk-free interest-bearing securities in 2022 to ensure downside protection against a campaign that was championed by the entire Board." That is an interesting way to phrase the board instructing Mr. Gad to stop pursuing an activist strategy that had cost shareholders millions. How does that ensure downside protection? What it did was stop losses and the board should be commended for it.
Why has Mr. Gad's track record been so poor? Board member, Nominating Committee chairman, fund manager, and successful activist, Tim Eriksen said, "In my opinion, Mr. Gad's poor track record is due to his poor capital allocation and a misguided, and some would say, unethical approach to activism that appears to be a cover for self-dealing. Mr. Gad repeatedly caused Paragon to purchase very small positions in companies and then used corporate resources (i.e. shareholder money) to wage an activist fight. The cost of the fight was often multiples of the dollar amount of stock purchased. If Mr. Gad was victorious, he would gain a board seat at the target company along with all the board fees. Shareholders were left with paying all the costs of the activism while Mr. Gad reaped the benefits. Don't be fooled, Mr. Gad's interests were never aligned with shareholders."
The Committee respectfully asks that shareholders wait for the internal investigation to be completed and for the Committee to complete its work before passing judgment.
Thank you,
Paragon Technologies Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
[i] Shareholders' equity was
[ii] Book value per share was
About Paragon Technologies
Paragon Technologies, Inc. is a holding company owning subsidiaries that engage in diverse business activities, including material handling, distribution, real estate, and investments. For additional information please visit: www.pgntgroup.com.
Paragon Technologies Contact:
info@pgntgroup.com
SOURCE: Paragon Technologies Inc.
View the original press release on ACCESS Newswire