Wynnefield Capital Expresses Concern that TechPrecision is Neglecting its Duties by Failing to Explain Proposed Acquisition of Votaw Precision Technologies to Stockholders
- None.
- None.
When evaluating the concerns raised by Wynnefield Capital regarding TechPrecision Corporation's proposed acquisition of Votaw Precision Technologies, one must consider the potential impact on shareholder value. The ownership stake of Wynnefield Capital positions them as a significant voice among institutional investors and their call for greater transparency could indicate underlying issues with the acquisition that may affect investor confidence.
Due diligence is a critical process in any acquisition and the lack of detailed financial information could raise red flags about the target company's valuation and the strategic fit within TechPrecision's portfolio. Shareholders and potential investors rely on thorough disclosures to assess the risk and potential return on such transactions.
In the short term, the market's reaction to this news could result in volatility in TechPrecision's stock price as investors digest the implications of the acquisition and the concerns of a major shareholder. In the long term, the success of the acquisition will hinge on the strategic integration of Votaw's operations and the realization of any projected synergies.
An industry perspective on this matter considers the competitive landscape and the potential for TechPrecision to enhance its market position through the acquisition. The precision technology sector is highly competitive and acquisitions are often pursued to access new technologies, expand product lines, or enter new markets.
However, without transparent and audited financials from Votaw, it is challenging to ascertain whether the acquisition would provide competitive advantages or if it might strain TechPrecision's resources without yielding the expected benefits. The lack of information could suggest that the acquisition is not aligned with industry best practices, where transparency and clear communication with shareholders are paramount.
Stakeholders would benefit from an independent analysis of the proposed acquisition, examining the strategic rationale behind the move, potential market synergies and the financial health of Votaw to ensure that the acquisition aligns with industry norms and would likely contribute positively to TechPrecision's growth trajectory.
From a legal standpoint, the demand for more comprehensive disclosure by Wynnefield Capital touches upon governance and compliance issues. Shareholders have legal rights to information that could materially affect their investment. If TechPrecision's Board of Directors fails to provide sufficient information, it could be seen as neglecting its fiduciary duty to its shareholders.
Moreover, the legal implications of not disclosing adequate information could lead to shareholder lawsuits or regulatory scrutiny, which could have financial and reputational repercussions for TechPrecision. It is crucial for the company to adhere to SEC regulations regarding disclosure and transparency, particularly when it involves significant corporate actions like acquisitions.
Ensuring compliance with these regulations not only protects the company and its board but also maintains shareholder trust and market integrity. The board's response to these concerns will be telling of the company's governance quality and could influence investor sentiment significantly.
***
Wynnefield Capital Concerned TechPrecision is Ignoring its Duty to Stockholders by Failing to Explain Proposed Acquisition of Votaw Precision Technologies.
Dear Board of Directors,
Wynnefield Capital and its affiliates (collectively, "Wynnefield") own 393,857 shares of common stock, or
Wynnefield acknowledges the Board of Directors recent issuance of Votaw Precision Technologies' ("Votaw") select, unaudited quarterly financials for the fiscal year ending October 31, 2023. However, that data alone will not placate existing TechPrecision stockholder interests in divulging critical information about the Votaw transaction. The Board of Directors' unwillingness to disclose funding structure for its proposed Votaw transaction continues to amplify a serious lack of transparency. Wynnefield is alarmed by this Board of Directors' disregard for its duties to ALL stockholders and its contribution to stockholder value destruction.
Since the proposed acquisition on November 29, 2023, TPCS shares declined by
The Board of Directors also took the unusual step stating in the Stock Purchase Agreement terms that the "Buyer's obligation to consummate the Contemplated Transactions is not in any way contingent upon or otherwise subject to Buyer's consummation of any financing arrangements." Further analysis indicates significant dilution for existing stockholders, including a potential Change-in-Control. A highly leveraged balance sheet with little margin of safety to pay its financial obligations is also a concern. A lower share price increases the risk of even more potential dilution.
Wynnefield hopes the Board of Directors is not attempting to paper-over its failed STADCO turnaround or side-stepping existing stockholders by accepting highly dilutive financing terms that is harmful to stockholders. Wynnefield would see this as unfathomable stockholder retribution for an unfavored Board of Directors (see the Company's Current Report on Form 8k with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 13, 2023).
We also question the Earnout Payment terms that reward the Seller an incremental
Lastly, on December 11, 2023, Occidental Petroleum Corp. ("Occidental") announced its intention to acquire CrownRock. While it is a large company, Occidental's Board of Directors followed two highly relevant corporate governance best practices by: 1) scheduling a conference call (with Q&A) for the same morning as the announcement and 2) explaining how the transaction would be funded. We applaud their stockholder friendly philosophy and embrace of best corporate governance practices unlike the Company's Board of Directors.
The Board of Directors' decision to remain silent has created tremendous uncertainty for existing stockholders, resulting in the continuing destruction of stockholder value. Wynnefield is concerned that the Board of Directors is purposely keeping stockholders in the dark because of what they already know. Wynnefield encourages the Board of Directors to address the Votaw transaction in more detail with the following considerations:
- EXPLAIN the strategic direction and reasoning behind this transaction.
- DETAIL claimed synergies amounting to "annual savings of several million dollars in overhead and millions of dollars in CAPEX over the coming years".
- DISCUSS current financing details for this transaction.
- COMMIT to allow existing TechPrecision stockholders to vote on the Votaw acquisition.
Respectfully yours,
Nelson J. Obus, Founder Robert D. Straus, Portfolio Manager
***
Media:
Daniel Yunger
Kekst CNC
daniel.yunger@kekstcnc.com
View original content:SOURCE Wynnefield Capital
FAQ
What is the name of the largest institutional stockholder of TechPrecision Corporation?
What is the beneficial ownership interest of Wynnefield Capital in TechPrecision Corporation?
What is the ticker symbol of TechPrecision Corporation?
What is the concern raised by Wynnefield Capital regarding TechPrecision Corporation?
What financial information did the Board of Directors of TechPrecision Corporation recently issue?
What is the ownership percentage of Wynnefield Capital in TechPrecision Corporation?
