STOCK TITAN

Brigham Minerals Stock Price, News & Analysis

MNRL NYSE

Company Description

Brigham Minerals, Inc. (historically listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker MNRL) was an Austin, Texas based company focused on the acquisition and active management of mineral and royalty interests in crude oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids. The company operated within the crude petroleum and natural gas extraction value chain by owning mineral and royalty interests rather than operating drilling rigs itself. Its stated primary business objective was to maximize risk-adjusted total return to its stockholders by capturing organic growth from its existing assets and by continuing to acquire additional minerals using a technically focused evaluation team.

According to multiple company communications, Brigham Minerals concentrated its portfolio in the core of some of the most active, liquids-rich resource basins across the continental United States. Its assets were located in the Delaware and Midland Basins in West Texas and New Mexico, the Anadarko Basin of Oklahoma (including the SCOOP and STACK plays), the DJ Basin in Colorado and Wyoming, and the Williston Basin in North Dakota. These basins are described in Brigham’s own releases as highly economic and liquids-rich, reflecting the company’s focus on oil-weighted and liquids-rich production exposure through its mineral and royalty positions.

Business model and mineral & royalty focus

Brigham Minerals described itself repeatedly as a mineral and royalty interest acquisition company. Rather than drilling and operating wells, it acquired mineral and royalty interests and then actively managed that portfolio. The company emphasized a technically driven approach, referencing a highly experienced technical evaluation team that it used to underwrite acquisitions and to monitor development activity across its acreage. Brigham highlighted the importance of organic growth from its inventory of drilled but uncompleted wells (DUCs), permits and future drilling locations, noting that conversions of DUCs to producing wells and new wells spud on its acreage were key drivers of production and cash flow growth.

Operational updates released by the company detailed its ongoing acquisition and divestiture activity. Brigham reported executing numerous transactions each quarter to acquire net royalty acres, with a substantial portion of its mineral acquisition capital deployed to the Permian Basin. It also reported selective divestitures, such as the sale of largely undeveloped Anadarko Basin minerals, as part of its portfolio rationalization. These disclosures underscore a business model centered on consolidating core mineral positions in active basins, recycling capital from non-core or less developed areas into higher priority opportunities.

Geographic footprint and basin exposure

Brigham’s public communications consistently identified its geographic footprint. The company stated that its assets were located in:

  • The Delaware and Midland Basins in West Texas and New Mexico
  • The Anadarko Basin of Oklahoma, including SCOOP and STACK plays
  • The DJ Basin in Colorado and Wyoming
  • The Williston Basin in North Dakota

In later releases, Brigham emphasized that the Permian Basin (Delaware and Midland) represented an increasing share of its net royalty acres and net locations. It reported that the Permian Basin made up a significant portion of its portfolio by mid-2022, reflecting a strategic emphasis on that region. The company also disclosed that its positions were being developed by a diverse group of operators, including highly active and well-capitalized exploration and production companies, particularly in the Midland Basin where it cited operators such as Endeavor Energy Resources, Pioneer Natural Resources, Diamondback Energy, ExxonMobil and others in connection with specific acquisitions and activity updates.

Activity wells, DUCs and organic growth

Brigham Minerals provided detailed data on its development inventory and activity wells. It regularly reported the number of gross and net wells spud on its mineral position, the number of DUCs and permits in inventory, and the rate at which DUCs were converted to proved developed producing wells. For example, the company disclosed quarterly records in wells spud and DUC conversions, and highlighted that a substantial portion of its production growth was driven by conversions of DUCs and ongoing drilling activity on its acreage.

These disclosures illustrate how Brigham’s mineral and royalty business model translated into operational outcomes. The company tracked and reported metrics such as net royalty acres by basin, gross and net wells spud, DUC and permit inventories, and conversions to production. This information was used by management to explain production growth, revenue trends and the expected contribution of its development inventory to future volumes.

Financial and operational reporting focus

Brigham Minerals issued regular earnings releases that outlined its operational and financial results. These communications described record daily production volumes, record royalty revenues, net income and Adjusted EBITDA, along with dividend declarations that combined a base dividend with a variable component tied to discretionary cash flow. The company emphasized the high-margin nature of its mineral and royalty revenue, its unhedged price realizations in certain periods, and the scalability of its cost structure.

In addition to headline metrics, Brigham provided detailed tables of production volumes by commodity, realized prices, operating expenses, and unit costs per barrel of oil equivalent. It also disclosed liquidity metrics such as cash balances, undrawn revolver capacity and borrowing base levels under its revolving credit facility. These details formed the basis of the company’s narrative around balance sheet conservatism, liquidity and capacity to fund acquisitions while maintaining leverage at levels it described as conservative.

Merger with Sitio Royalties Corp. and status of MNRL

A key corporate event for Brigham Minerals was its all-stock merger with Sitio Royalties Corp. Brigham and Sitio announced a definitive agreement to combine in an all-stock transaction, describing the combination as creating a large consolidator of oil and gas mineral and royalty interests with complementary high-quality assets in the Permian Basin and other U.S. oil basins. The companies stated that the combined entity would operate under the Sitio Royalties Corp. name and would be headquartered in Denver, Colorado.

Subsequently, Brigham reported that its stockholders approved the merger with Sitio Royalties Corp. at a special meeting. The company stated that the merger was anticipated to close on December 29, 2022, and that, at the close of trading on the day of the stockholder vote, Brigham Class A common stock would no longer be listed for trading on the New York Stock Exchange. Brigham also detailed the exchange ratio and consideration structure for its stockholders and unitholders in connection with the merger.

Based on these disclosures, the MNRL ticker represents a former listing associated with Brigham Minerals, Inc. that was merged into Sitio Royalties Corp. Following the merger, public communications describe the combined company as retaining the Sitio Royalties Corp. name, with Sitio’s management team leading the combined entity. As a result, MNRL functions as a historical symbol for Brigham Minerals rather than an active, standalone public company ticker.

Historical role in the mineral and royalty sector

In its own communications, Brigham Minerals characterized itself as a mineral and royalty interest acquisition company with a track record of assembling a diversified portfolio across several key U.S. oil and gas basins. The company highlighted its focus on core, liquids-rich resource plays and on working with a diverse set of operators. Its merger with Sitio Royalties Corp. was described as combining two of the largest public mineral and royalty companies, with the stated intention of creating a premier consolidator in the fragmented mineral and royalty interest space.

For investors and researchers, MNRL now primarily serves as a reference point for Brigham Minerals’ historical operations, asset base and corporate actions leading up to its combination with Sitio Royalties Corp. Current information about the ongoing business is associated with Sitio Royalties Corp., while MNRL-linked materials provide context on Brigham’s legacy mineral and royalty portfolio and its contribution to the combined company.

Stock Performance

$—
0.00%
0.00
Last updated:
-
Performance 1 year

SEC Filings

No SEC filings available for Brigham Minerals.

Financial Highlights

Revenue (TTM)
Net Income (TTM)
Operating Cash Flow

Upcoming Events

Short Interest History

Last 12 Months
Loading short interest data...

Days to Cover History

Last 12 Months
Loading days to cover data...

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the market cap of Brigham Minerals (MNRL)?

The market cap of Brigham Minerals (MNRL) is approximately 2.0B. Learn more about what market capitalization means .

What did Brigham Minerals, Inc. (MNRL) do?

Brigham Minerals, Inc., historically traded under the ticker MNRL, was an Austin, Texas based company that acquired and actively managed a portfolio of mineral and royalty interests. It focused on owning interests in the core of active, liquids-rich oil and gas basins across the continental United States and described its primary objective as maximizing risk-adjusted total return to stockholders through organic growth and continued mineral acquisitions.

In which basins did Brigham Minerals hold mineral and royalty interests?

According to the company’s own descriptions, Brigham Minerals’ assets were located in the Delaware and Midland Basins in West Texas and New Mexico, the Anadarko Basin of Oklahoma (including the SCOOP and STACK plays), the DJ Basin in Colorado and Wyoming, and the Williston Basin in North Dakota. The company emphasized that these areas were among the most active and highly economic liquids-rich resource basins in the continental United States.

How did Brigham Minerals describe its business model?

Brigham Minerals described itself as a mineral and royalty interest acquisition company that actively managed its portfolio. It relied on a highly experienced technical evaluation team to underwrite acquisitions and monitor development activity. The company emphasized capturing organic growth from its existing assets, particularly through the conversion of drilled but uncompleted wells and permits to producing wells, while also pursuing additional mineral acquisitions.

What happened to Brigham Minerals’ MNRL ticker?

Brigham Minerals announced that it entered into a definitive agreement to merge with Sitio Royalties Corp. in an all-stock transaction. The company later reported that its stockholders approved the merger and stated that, at the close of trading on the day of the stockholder vote, Brigham Class A common stock would no longer be listed for trading on the New York Stock Exchange. The combined company operates under the Sitio Royalties Corp. name, so MNRL is now a historical ticker associated with Brigham Minerals prior to the merger.

How did Brigham Minerals report its operational performance?

Brigham Minerals issued regular earnings releases that detailed record daily production volumes, royalty revenues, net income and Adjusted EBITDA. It provided tables showing production by commodity, realized prices, operating expenses and unit costs per barrel of oil equivalent. The company also reported metrics such as net royalty acres by basin, gross and net wells spud, drilled but uncompleted wells, permit inventories and conversions to production to explain its operational performance and organic growth.

What role did the Permian Basin play in Brigham Minerals’ portfolio?

Company disclosures show that Brigham Minerals increasingly concentrated capital in the Permian Basin, which includes the Delaware and Midland Basins in West Texas and New Mexico. It reported deploying all or substantially all of its mineral acquisition capital in certain quarters to the Permian Basin and noted that the Permian represented a growing share of its net royalty acres and net locations. The company also highlighted acquisitions in the core of the Midland Basin and activity by operators such as Endeavor Energy Resources, Pioneer Natural Resources and ExxonMobil on its Permian acreage.

How did Brigham Minerals describe its approach to acquisitions and divestitures?

Brigham Minerals reported executing multiple transactions each quarter to acquire net royalty acres, often focusing on core positions in the Permian Basin. It also disclosed divestitures of largely undeveloped minerals, such as sales of Anadarko Basin assets, as part of portfolio rationalization. Management commentary described a patient and disciplined approach to consolidating core minerals, using a conservative balance sheet and liquidity to pursue opportunities while selectively monetizing non-core assets.

Is Brigham Minerals still an independent public company?

Based on the company’s own merger announcements, Brigham Minerals agreed to combine with Sitio Royalties Corp. in an all-stock transaction and reported that its stockholders approved the merger. The combined company retains the Sitio Royalties Corp. name and is led by Sitio’s executive leadership team. Brigham also stated that its Class A common stock would no longer be listed on the New York Stock Exchange at the close of trading on the day of the stockholder vote, indicating that Brigham Minerals no longer trades as an independent public company under the MNRL ticker.