Atlas Energy Solutions proposes Texas reincorporation
AESI generated approximately $764.1 million in Texas revenue in 2025, representing approximately 70% of total revenue; approximately 89% of employees were based there.
Sentiment and the balance of points
Rhea-AI Sentiment reads the wording of the document, how positive or negative its language is on a 1 to 5 scale. The balance of points shown with the takes weighs what the document actually discloses, so the two can disagree, for example when a trial that missed its main goal is described in upbeat language.
Atlas Energy Solutions Inc. (AESI) is asking stockholders to approve its conversion from a Delaware corporation to a Texas corporation; the reincorporation is subject to stockholder approval. A separate proposal would authorize one or more adjournments to solicit additional proxies if votes for reincorporation are insufficient.
The Board unanimously recommends approval. Under the proposed Texas charter, plaintiffs in derivative proceedings would need to hold at least 1% of outstanding shares; the Texas Business Court would be the exclusive forum for internal entity claims; and holders of 50% of shares entitled to vote, or the highest percentage then permitted by the TBOC, could request special meetings. The company says the change would eliminate its annual Delaware franchise tax, which was $250,000 in fiscal 2025, while its Texas franchise tax is not expected to change. The Board cautions that expected benefits may not be realized and says non-recurring legal and other transaction costs will be incurred.
Positive
- None.
Negative
- Minor point. Forward-looking: it has not happened yet and may not happen.Derivative suits would require 1% ownership of outstanding shares.
- Minor point. Forward-looking: it has not happened yet and may not happen.Proposed special-meeting threshold: 50%, or highest percentage then permitted by TBOC.
Key Figures
Key Terms
Plan of Conversion regulatory
derivative proceeding regulatory
exclusive forum provision regulatory
business judgment rule regulatory
reorganization regulatory
FAQ
AI-generated questions and answers. How Rhea-AI works. Not financial advice.
What is AESI asking shareholders to approve?
What vote is required for AESI's reincorporation proposal?
Can AESI's board abandon the Texas reincorporation after the vote?
AI-generated analysis. How Rhea-AI works. Not financial advice.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
☒ | Preliminary Proxy Statement |
☐ | Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) |
☐ | Definitive Proxy Statement |
☐ | Definitive Additional Materials |
☐ | Soliciting Material under §240.14a-12 |
Atlas Energy Solutions Inc. |
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter) |
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant) |
☒ | No fee required. |
☐ | Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. |
☐ | Fee computed on table in exhibit required by Item 25(b) per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. |
TABLE OF CONTENTS

By Order of the Board of Directors | |||
Ben M. “Bud” Brigham | |||
Executive Chairman of the Board of Atlas Energy Solutions Inc. | |||
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ABOUT THE SPECIAL MEETING | 2 | ||
PROPOSAL TO APPROVE THE REINCORPORATION OF THE COMPANY TO THE STATE OF TEXAS BY CONVERSION | 5 | ||
PROPOSAL TO APPROVE ONE OR MORE ADJOURNMENTS OF THE SPECIAL MEETING, IF NECESSARY OR APPROPRIATE, TO SOLICIT ADDITIONAL PROXIES IF THERE ARE INSUFFICIENT VOTES AT THE TIME OF THE SPECIAL MEETING TO APPROVE THE REINCORPORATION PROPOSAL | 54 | ||
OWNERSHIP OF ATLAS ENERGY SOLUTIONS INC. COMMON STOCK | 55 | ||
STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS AND DIRECTOR NOMINATIONS FOR THE 2027 ANNUAL MEETING | 57 | ||
HOUSEHOLDING; AVAILABILITY OF PROXY STATEMENT | 57 | ||
OTHER MATTERS | 57 | ||
APPENDIX A: TEXAS REINCORPORATION RESOLUTIONS | A-1 | ||
APPENDIX B: PLAN OF CONVERSION | B-1 | ||
APPENDIX C: TEXAS CERTIFICATE OF FORMATION OF ATLAS ENERGY SOLUTIONS INC. | C-1 | ||
APPENDIX D: TEXAS BYLAWS OF ATLAS ENERGY SOLUTIONS INC. | D-1 | ||
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
• | Stockholders of Record: Stockholders of record may vote their shares or submit a proxy to have their shares voted by one of the following methods: |
○ | Via the Internet. You may submit a proxy via the Internet by following the instructions included on the proxy card you received by mail. Internet voting facilities will be available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, and will close at 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time, the day before the Special Meeting. |
○ | By Telephone. You may submit a proxy via telephone by using the toll-free number included on the proxy card you received by mail. Telephone voting will be available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, and will close at 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time, the day before the Special Meeting. |
○ | By Mail. You may indicate your vote by completing, signing and dating your proxy card and returning it to the address on your proxy card sufficiently in time to be received prior to the Special Meeting. |
○ | In Person. You may attend the Special Meeting at the Company’s corporate headquarters at 5918 W. Courtyard Drive, Suite 100, Austin, Texas 78730 and vote your shares in person by ballot prior to the closing of the polls. |
• | Street Name Stockholders: As the street name stockholder, you are being forwarded our proxy materials by the stockholder of record and you have the right to direct the stockholder of record how to vote. Street name stockholders may generally vote their shares by one of the following methods: |
○ | By Methods Listed on Voting Instruction Form. Please refer to the voting instruction form provided to you by the stockholder of record (e.g., your bank, broker, or other nominee) to determine whether you may submit your vote by mail, telephone, or electronically via the Internet. |
TABLE OF CONTENTS
○ | In Person with a Proxy from the Stockholder of Record. You may vote in person at the Special Meeting if you obtain a legal proxy from the stockholder of record (e.g., your bank, broker, or other nominee) and present it at the Special Meeting. Please refer to the voting instruction form provided to you by the stockholder of record to determine how to obtain a legal proxy in order to vote in person at the Special Meeting. |
TABLE OF CONTENTS
• | FOR the approval of the Texas Reincorporation, including the Plan of Conversion, and the adoption of the Texas Reincorporation Resolutions; and |
• | FOR the approval of one or more adjournments of the Special Meeting, if necessary or appropriate, to solicit additional proxies if there are insufficient votes at the time of the Special Meeting to approve the Reincorporation Proposal. |
TABLE OF CONTENTS
• | The Company will continue in existence as a Texas corporation and will continue to operate our business under the current name, “Atlas Energy Solutions Inc.” |
• | The affairs of the Company will cease to be governed by Delaware law and will instead be subject to Texas law. See “— Effects of the Texas Reincorporation — Comparison of Stockholder Rights under Delaware and Texas Law” below. |
• | The Company will cease to be governed by our existing amended and restated certificate of incorporation (the “Delaware Charter”) and existing amended and restated bylaws (the “Delaware Bylaws”) and will instead be governed by the provisions of the proposed Texas certificate of formation (the “Texas Charter”) and the proposed Texas bylaws (the “Texas Bylaws”), copies of which are included as Appendix C and Appendix D, respectively, to this proxy statement. See “— Effects of the Texas Reincorporation — Certain Differences Between the Delaware Charter and Bylaws and the Texas Charter and Bylaws” below. |
• | The Texas Reincorporation will not result in any change in headquarters, business, jobs, management, properties, location of any of our offices, number of employees, obligations, assets, liabilities or net worth (other than as a result of the transaction costs related to the Texas Reincorporation and the elimination of Delaware franchise taxes). |
• | Each outstanding share of Delaware Corporation Common Stock will be automatically converted into one outstanding share of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, of the Texas Corporation (the “Texas Corporation Common Stock”) pursuant to the Plan of Conversion. |
• | Stockholders will not need to exchange their existing stock certificates for new stock certificates. |
• | The Delaware Corporation Common Stock will continue to be traded on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) and NYSE Texas, Inc. (“NYSE Texas”) as the Texas Corporation Common Stock under the symbol “AESI.” We do not expect any interruption in trading as a result of the Texas Reincorporation. |
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Issue | Delaware Charter and Delaware Bylaws | Texas Charter and Texas Bylaws | ||||
With Respect to the Board of Directors | ||||||
Procedures for Filling Vacant Directorships | The Delaware Charter provides that, subject to the Stockholders’ Agreement (as defined in the Delaware Charter), vacancies on the Board shall be filled solely by a majority vote of the directors then in office, even if less than a quorum, or by a sole remaining director, and not by the stockholders. | The Texas Charter provides that, subject to the Stockholders’ Agreement (as defined in the Texas Charter), vacancies on the Board may be filled in any manner permitted by the TBOC, including by a majority vote of the remaining directors then in office, even if less than a quorum, by a sole remaining director, or, as permitted by the TBOC, by the election at an annual or special meeting of shareholders called for that purpose. The TBOC provides that during a period between two successive annual meetings of shareholders, the Board may not fill more than two vacancies created by an increase in the number of directors. | ||||
Committees | The Delaware Charter provides that the Board may designate one or more of its members as alternate members, who may, subject to any limitations imposed by the Board, replace absent or disqualified members at any committee meeting. The Delaware Bylaws permit, in the absence or disqualification of a member of the committee, the member or members thereof present at any meeting and not disqualified from voting, whether or not constituting a | While the TBOC provides that the board of directors as a whole may designate alternate committee members, the TBOC provides that a committee of the board of directors may not fill vacancies on or designate alternate members of a committee of the board of directors, and so the Texas Charter and Texas Bylaws do not contain such provisions. | ||||
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Issue | Delaware Charter and Delaware Bylaws | Texas Charter and Texas Bylaws | ||||
quorum, to unanimously appoint another member of the Board to act at the meeting in place of any such absent or disqualified member. | ||||||
Limitation of Personal Liability of Directors and Officers | Under the DGCL, a Delaware corporation is permitted to adopt a provision in its certificate of incorporation eliminating or limiting the personal liability of a director or officer to the corporation or its stockholders for monetary damages for breach of fiduciary duty as a director or officer, provided that such provision does not eliminate or limit the liability of: (i) a director or officer breaching the duty of loyalty to the corporation or its stockholders; (ii) a director or officer failing to act in good faith or engaging in intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law; (iii) a director declaring an unlawful dividend or approving an unlawful stock purchase or redemption; (iv) a director or officer for any transaction from which they derived an improper personal benefit; or (v) an officer in any action by or in the right of a Delaware corporation. The Delaware Charter eliminates the personal liability of the Company’s directors and officers to the Company or its stockholders for monetary damages for breach of fiduciary duty as a director or officer, as applicable, except to the extent such exemption from liability or limitation thereof is not permitted under the DGCL as it now exists or as it may be amended in the future. | Under the TBOC, a corporation is permitted to provide that a director or officer is not liable, or is liable only to the extent provided by the certificate of formation, to the corporation or its shareholders for monetary damages for an act or omission by the person in the person’s capacity as a director or officer, respectively. The TBOC does not, however, permit any limitation of the liability of a director or officer for: (i) a breach of the duty of loyalty to the corporation or its shareholders; (ii) an act or omission not in good faith that constitutes a breach of duty of the person to the corporation or involves intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law; (iii) a transaction from which the director or officer obtains an improper benefit, regardless of whether the benefit resulted from an action taken within the scope of the person’s duties; or (iv) an act or omission for which the liability of a director or officer is expressly provided by an applicable statute (such as wrongful distributions). The Texas Charter eliminates the personal liability of the Company’s directors and officers to the Company or its shareholders for monetary damages for breach of fiduciary duty as a director or officer, as applicable, except to the extent such exemption from liability or limitation thereof is not permitted under the TBOC as it now exists or as it may be amended in the future. | ||||
Indemnification | The Delaware Bylaws provide that, to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law as it exists or may be amended, the Company will indemnify and hold harmless any person who is or was made party or is threatened to be made party to or is otherwise involved in any threatened, pending or completed action, suit or proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative | The Texas Bylaws provide that, to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law as it exists or may be amended, the Company will indemnify and hold harmless any person who is or was made party or is or was a witness in or is threatened to be made party to or is otherwise involved or asked to participate in any threatened, pending or completed action, suit or proceeding by | ||||
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Issue | Delaware Charter and Delaware Bylaws | Texas Charter and Texas Bylaws | ||||
by reason of the fact that he or she, or a person for whom he or she is the legal representative, is or was or has agreed to become a director or officer of the Company or, while serving as a director or officer of the Company, is or was serving or has agreed to serve at the request of the Company as a director, officer, trustee, employee or agent of another corporation or of a partnership, joint venture, trust, other enterprise or nonprofit entity. The Delaware Bylaws also include provisions regarding the right of an indemnitee to bring suit, non-exclusivity of rights, insurance and contract rights. See “— Comparison of Stockholder Rights under Delaware and Texas Law — Indemnification of Directors and Officers,” “Procedure for Indemnification” and “Mandatory Indemnification” below. | reason of the fact that he or she, or a person whom he or she is the legal representative, is or was or has agreed to become a director or officer of the Company or, while a director or officer of the Company, is or was serving or has agreed to serve at the request of the Company as a governing person, director, officer, trustee, delegate, employee, agent or other representative (as defined by the TBOC) of another corporation or of a partnership, joint venture, trust, other enterprise or nonprofit entity (“Covered Person”). The Texas Bylaws additionally provide that the Company will indemnify any Covered Person that has been wholly successful on the merits or otherwise in defense of any proceeding, or in defense of any claim, issue or matter therein, against all reasonable expenses actually incurred by such Covered Person in connection with such proceeding. The Texas Bylaws also include provisions regarding the right of an indemnitee to bring suit, non-exclusivity of rights, insurance and contract rights, and written reports to shareholders of indemnification or advancement of expenses to directors. See “— Comparison of Stockholder Rights under Delaware and Texas Law — Indemnification of Directors and Officers,” “Procedure for Indemnification” and “Mandatory Indemnification” below. | |||||
Advancement of Expenses | The Delaware Bylaws provide that the Corporation shall, to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law as it presently exists or may be amended, pay the expenses (including attorneys’ fees) incurred by an indemnitee in defending any proceeding in advance of its final disposition. The Delaware Bylaws also provide that as a condition to the advancement of expenses, to the extent required by applicable law, the Company must receive by or on behalf of the indemnitee an undertaking to repay all amounts so advanced if it shall ultimately be determined that the | Under the TBOC, before a corporation can advance expenses incurred by an indemnitee in connection with any legal proceedings, the indemnitee is also required to provide, in addition to a written undertaking to repay any expenses advanced if such indemnitee is ultimately not entitled to indemnification, a written affirmation by the person of the person’s good faith belief that the person has met the standard of conduct necessary for indemnification, which requirement is included in the Texas Bylaws. | ||||
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Issue | Delaware Charter and Delaware Bylaws | Texas Charter and Texas Bylaws | ||||
indemnitee is not entitled to be indemnified. | ||||||
With Respect to Stockholders | ||||||
Stockholder Vote for Fundamental Business Transactions and Charter Amendments | Certain matters requiring stockholder approval under the DGCL, including certain fundamental business transactions and amendments to the certificate of incorporation, require a default vote of a majority in voting power of the outstanding stock of the corporation entitled to vote thereon, unless the certificate of incorporation specifies a higher voting threshold. Except as described below, the Delaware Charter does not include a higher voting threshold for such business transactions, so the default voting standard applies. The Delaware Charter requires the affirmative vote of the holders of at least 75% in voting power for specified amendments and transactions involving a public benefit corporation or similar entity, and to amend the provision imposing that 75% requirement. The Delaware Charter requires the affirmative vote of the holders of at least 66 2/3% in voting power to amend the Delaware Charter. | Under the TBOC, certain matters subject to a shareholder vote, including “fundamental business transactions” such as mergers, sales of all or substantially all of the corporation’s assets, and other transactions, require a default vote of two-thirds of the outstanding shares entitled to vote on the matter, unless the certificate of formation specifies a lower voting threshold. The Texas Charter provides that, except as otherwise required by the Texas Charter, the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority in the voting power of the outstanding shares of capital stock entitled to vote on the matter, voting as a single class, shall be required to approve any action of the Company which, under the provisions of the TBOC or any other applicable law, is required to be approved by the vote of a specified portion which is in excess of the majority of all then outstanding shares entitled to vote thereon, including any “fundamental action” or “fundamental business transaction.” The Texas Charter includes the same higher voting thresholds for certain amendments to the Texas Charter as included in the Delaware Charter. | ||||
Special Meetings of Stockholders | The Delaware Charter provides that special stockholder meetings may be called only by the Executive Chairman of the Board, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, or the Board pursuant to a resolution adopted by a majority of the whole Board. Stockholders do not currently have the authority to call a special stockholder meeting under the Delaware Charter or the Delaware Bylaws. | The Texas Charter provides that special shareholder meetings may be called only by the Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, the President of the Company to the extent required by the TBOC, the Board pursuant to a resolution adopted by a majority of the Board, or by the Secretary of the Company upon a request by the holders of not less than 50% (or the highest percentage then permitted by the TBOC) of all then outstanding shares of capital stock of the Company entitled to | ||||
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Issue | Delaware Charter and Delaware Bylaws | Texas Charter and Texas Bylaws | ||||
vote at such special meeting made in accordance with the provisions and requirements of the Bylaws. The Texas Charter additionally provides that if the TBOC is amended to authorize corporate action further eliminating or limiting the ability of shareholders to call special meetings, then the ability of shareholders to call special meetings shall be eliminated or limited to the fullest extent permitted by the TBOC as so amended. | ||||||
Cancellation or Postponement of Special Stockholder Meeting | The Delaware Charter provides that the Board may postpone, reschedule or cancel a special stockholder meeting previously scheduled by the Board. | Under the TBOC, the Board may not cancel a special meeting of shareholders called by shareholders. The Texas Charter provides that the Board may postpone, recess, adjourn, reschedule, or cancel (to the extent permitted by the TBOC) a special shareholder meeting previously scheduled by the Board. | ||||
Action by Written Consent | The Delaware Charter provides that, subject to the rights of holders of any series of preferred stock with respect to such series of preferred stock, any action required or permitted to be taken by the stockholders must be taken at a duly held annual or special meeting of stockholders and may not be taken by any consent of such stockholders. | Under the TBOC, shareholders are required to have the option to act by written consent in lieu of a meeting. The Texas Charter and Texas Bylaws provide that, subject to the rights of the holders of any series of preferred stock with respect to such series of preferred stock, any action required or permitted to be taken at any annual or special meeting of the shareholders may be taken without a meeting, without prior notice and without a vote if a consent or consents in writing, setting forth the action so taken, shall be signed by all holders of outstanding shares of capital stock of the Company entitled to vote on such action. | ||||
Restrictions on Business Combinations | The Delaware Charter provides that the Company will not be governed by Section 203 of the DGCL (“Section 203”), and that the restrictions contained in Section 203 will not apply to the Company until immediately following the first time at which both (i) Section 203 by its terms would, but for the provisions of the Delaware Charter, apply to the Company and (ii) none of the Principal Stockholders (as defined in the Stockholders’ Agreement) own (as defined in Section 203) 15% or more of | The Texas Charter provides that the Company will not be governed by Section 21.606 of the TBOC (“Section 21.606”), and that the restrictions contained in Section 21.606 will not apply to the Company until immediately following the first time at which both (i) Section 21.606 would, by its terms and but for the Texas Charter, apply to the Company and (ii) none of the Principal Stockholders (as such term is defined in the Stockholders’ Agreement) beneficially own (as defined in Section 21.603 of the TBOC) | ||||
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Issue | Delaware Charter and Delaware Bylaws | Texas Charter and Texas Bylaws | ||||
the voting power of all the then outstanding shares of capital stock of the Company. From and after that time, the Company would be governed by Section 203 for so long as Section 203 by its terms would apply to the Company. The Company is not currently subject to Section 203 because these conditions are not satisfied. See “— Comparison of Stockholder Rights under Delaware and Texas Law— Business Combinations Statute” below. | 20% or more of the outstanding voting shares of the Company (as defined in Section 21.601 of the TBOC). From and after that time, the Company would be governed by Section 21.606 for so long as Section 21.606 by its terms would apply to the Company. See “— Comparison of Stockholder Rights under Delaware and Texas Law— Business Combinations Statute” below. | |||||
Exclusive Forum | The Delaware Charter provides that, unless the Company consents in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware (or, if the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware does not have jurisdiction, the Superior Court of the State of Delaware, or, if the Superior Court of the State of Delaware does not have jurisdiction, the United States District Court for the District of Delaware) shall be the exclusive forum for any stockholder (including a beneficial owner) to bring (i) any derivative action or proceeding brought on behalf of the Company, (ii) any action asserting a claim of breach of a fiduciary duty owed by any current or former director, officer, employee or stockholder of the Company to the Company or the Company’s stockholders, (iii) any action asserting a claim arising pursuant to any provision of the DGCL or the Delaware Charter or Delaware Bylaws (as either may be amended from time to time) or as to which the DGCL confers jurisdiction on the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware, the Delaware Charter or Delaware Bylaws, or (iv) any action asserting a claim governed by the internal affairs doctrine. The Delaware Charter also provides that, unless the Company consents in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, the federal district courts of the United States of America shall be the sole and exclusive forum for the resolution of | The Texas Charter provides that the Business Court in the Third Business Court Division of the State of Texas (the “Business Court”) (or, if the Business Court determines it does not have jurisdiction or otherwise cannot, or declines to, hear the applicable cause of action, the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, Austin Division (the “Federal Court”), or, if the Federal Court lacks jurisdiction or otherwise cannot, or declines to, hear the applicable cause of action, the state district court of Travis County, Texas) shall, to the fullest extent permitted by law, be the exclusive forum for (i) any derivative action or proceeding brought on behalf of the Company, (ii) any action asserting a claim of breach of a fiduciary duty owed by any current or former director, officer, employee, shareholder or agent of the Company to the Company or the Company’s shareholders, including a claim alleging the aiding and abetting of such breach of fiduciary duty, (iii) any action asserting a claim arising pursuant to any provision of the TBOC or the Texas Charter or the Texas Bylaws (as either may be amended from time to time) or as to which the TBOC confers jurisdiction on the Business Court, (iv) any action to interpret, apply, enforce or determine the validity of the Texas Charter or the Texas Bylaws, (v) any action asserting a claim related to or involving the Company that is governed by the internal affairs | ||||
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Issue | Delaware Charter and Delaware Bylaws | Texas Charter and Texas Bylaws | ||||
any complaint asserting a cause of action arising under the Securities Act. The exclusive forum provision in the Delaware Charter does not apply to actions brought to enforce any liability or duty created by the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). | doctrine, (vi) any other action asserting a claim against the Company, its directors, officers or employees constituting an “internal entity claim” as defined under the TBOC, and (vii) any other action within the jurisdiction of the Business Court, including any claims within the supplemental jurisdiction of the Business Court. The Texas Charter also provides that, unless the Company consents in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, the federal district courts of the United States of America shall be the sole and exclusive forum for the resolution of any complaint asserting a cause of action arising under the Securities Act. The exclusive forum provision in the Texas Charter does not apply to actions brought to enforce any liability or duty created by the Exchange Act. | |||||
Stock Ownership Requirement for Derivative Suits; Jury Trials | The Delaware Charter does not include a minimum stock ownership requirement with respect to the right to institute or maintain a derivative suit. Neither the Delaware Charter nor the Delaware Bylaws includes a mandatory waiver of the right to a jury trial. However, the Delaware Court of Chancery, which has been designated in the Delaware Charter as the forum for internal affairs claims, does not have jury trials. | The Texas Charter provides that the Company affirmatively elects to be governed by Section 21.419 of the TBOC, and that no shareholder of the Company may institute or maintain a derivative proceeding in the right of the Company unless that shareholder is a Shareholder(s) (as defined in Section 21.551(2) of the TBOC) that, at the time the derivative proceeding is instituted, holds at least 1% of the outstanding shares of capital stock of the Company. The Texas Charter provides that each current or former shareholder, and any beneficial owner of shares, director and officer of the Company irrevocably and unconditionally waives any right it may have to a trial by jury in any legal action, proceeding, cause of action, cross-claim or counterclaim (including with respect to those brought derivatively on behalf of the Corporation) concerning (i) any “internal entity claim” as that term is defined in Section 2.115 of the TBOC, (ii) to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, in any other claim, action, or proceeding against the | ||||
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Issue | Delaware Charter and Delaware Bylaws | Texas Charter and Texas Bylaws | ||||
Company or any director, officer, or other employee of the Company, and (iii) any claim arising under or pursuant to the TBOC, the Texas Charter or Texas Bylaws (as either may be amended or restated). | ||||||
Duration of Proxies | Consistent with the DGCL, the Delaware Bylaws provide that no proxy shall be voted or acted upon after three years from its date, unless the proxy provides for a longer period. | Consistent with the TBOC, the Texas Bylaws provide that no proxy shall be voted or acted upon after eleven months from its date of execution, unless the proxy provides otherwise. | ||||
Issue | Delaware | Texas | ||||
Fiduciary Duties | In Delaware, fiduciary duties are generally developed by case law. In general, directors and officers owe fiduciary duties of care and loyalty (which further include the duties of good faith, oversight, and disclosure) to the corporation and its stockholders. Controlling stockholders also owe certain fiduciary duties to the corporation and its stockholders. The duty of care requires directors not to act with gross negligence, including, depending on the facts and circumstances, by being well-informed and gathering and considering reasonably available relevant information. The duty of loyalty requires directors to act in good faith and under the belief that their actions will be best for the corporation and its stockholders. Directors are “fully protected” if they rely in good faith upon the records of the corporation and upon such information, opinions, reports or | In Texas, fiduciary duties are generally developed by case law. Directors and officers owe fiduciary duties of loyalty, care, and obedience to the corporation. In general, directors and officers do not owe fiduciary duties to the corporation’s stockholders. In general, controlling shareholders do not owe fiduciary duties to the corporation or its stockholders. The duty of care requires directors and officers be diligent and prudent in managing the company’s affairs and handle their duties with the care that an ordinarily prudent person would use under similar circumstances. The duty of loyalty requires that directors and officers act in good faith and not allow their personal interests to prevail over the interests of the corporation and its shareholders. The duty of obedience forbids directors and officers from committing ultra vires acts and from disobeying the law. While Delaware law does not describe | ||||
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Issue | Delaware | Texas | ||||
statements presented to the corporation by any of the corporation’s officers or employees, or committees of the board of directors, or by any other person as to matters the member reasonably believes are within such other person’s professional or expert competence and who has been selected with reasonable care by or on behalf of the corporation. | directors as having “a duty of obedience,” Delaware law similarly provides for such restrictions. Directors and officers may rely in good faith on information, opinions, reports, or statements, including financial statements and other financial data, prepared or presented by an officer or employee of the corporation, legal counsel, a certified public accountant, an investment banker, a person who the director or officer reasonably believes possesses professional expertise in the matter, or a committee of the corporation on which the director or officer does not serve. | |||||
Business Judgment Rule | Under Delaware law, directors and officers are generally protected by the business judgment rule, which is a presumption that in making a business decision the directors of a corporation acted on an informed basis, in good faith and in the honest belief that the action taken was in the best interests of the company. Under the business judgment rule, a court will generally not second-guess directors’ decisions unless the business judgment rule’s presumptions have been rebutted for the challenged decision. If the business judgment rule’s presumptions have been rebutted, directors will not be personally liable absent a finding of non-exculpated fiduciary misconduct. The Delaware Charter has an exculpation provision which forecloses personal liability for monetary damages for breaches of the duty of care for directors and officers. See “— Certain Differences Between the Delaware Charter and Bylaws and the Texas Charter and Bylaws — Limitation of Personal Liability of Directors and Officers” above. Delaware courts apply enhanced scrutiny in certain scenarios involving the adoption of defensive measures, certain change of control transactions, and certain scenarios impacting stockholders’ voting rights. If enhanced | For a corporation listed on a national securities exchange or that has elected in its governing documents to be governed by Section 21.419 of the TBOC (in either case, a “21.419 Corporation”) the TBOC codifies the business judgment rule and establishes a rebuttable presumption that directors and officers, in deciding upon matters of business, act in good faith, on an informed basis, in furtherance of the interests of the corporation, and in obedience to the law and the corporation’s governing documents. The TBOC designates the business judgment rule as the governing standard for director and officer liability, including transactions with controlling shareholders. Under Section 21.419, neither a corporation nor its shareholders has a cause of action against a director or officer based on an act or omission in the person’s capacity as a director or officer unless: (1) the claimant rebuts one or more of the presumptions above; and (2) the claimant proves a breach of a duty owed as a director or officer and that the breach involved fraud, intentional misconduct, an ultra vires act, or a knowing violation of law. The presumptions established by Section 21.419 are in addition to any legal presumption arising under common law or the TBOC, in favor of | ||||
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Issue | Delaware | Texas | ||||
scrutiny applies, the court generally reviews directors’ actions for reasonableness. Delaware courts apply the most stringent entire fairness standard of review where either (i) a majority of directors who made the challenged decision were interested or lacked independence from an interested party or (ii) certain transactions involving a conflicted controlling stockholder. However, the DGCL provides that if a statutory safe harbor applies, the act or transaction cannot be the subject of equitable relief or give rise to an award of money damages against directors, officers, or controlling stockholders. | any managerial official of a corporation to which this section applies. The Texas Charter has an exculpation provision which forecloses personal liability for directors and officers’ duty of care breaches. | |||||
Interested Party Transaction Approvals | The DGCL provides safe harbor procedures for acts or transactions in which one or more directors or officers, or a controlling stockholder or control group, may have a conflict of interest. If one of the statutory safe harbors applies, the act or transaction at issue may not be the subject of equitable relief or give rise to an award of damages against a director or officer. The DGCL provides that certain acts or transactions involving interested directors or officers will be protected if the act or transaction is (i) approved or, in the case of a committee, recommended for approval, by a majority of the disinterested directors, either serving on the board of directors or a committee of the board of directors, acting in good faith, without gross negligence and with knowledge as to the material facts, (ii) approved or ratified by an informed, uncoerced, affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast by the disinterested stockholders entitled to vote thereon, or (iii) fair to the corporation and its stockholders. If a majority of the directors are not disinterested directors with respect to the act or transaction, any such disinterested director approval or recommendation must be provided through a disinterested director committee that consists of two or more directors. The DGCL provides statutory definitions of what parties constitute a | The TBOC provides that an otherwise valid and enforceable contract or transaction between a corporation and (i) one or more directors or officers of the corporation, or one or more affiliates or associates thereof, or (ii) an entity or other organization in which one or more directors or officers of the corporation, or one or more affiliates or associates thereof, is a “managerial official” or has a financial interest, is valid and enforceable, and is not void or voidable, notwithstanding such relationship or interest if any one of the following conditions is satisfied: (a) the material facts as to the applicable relationship or interest and as to the contract or transaction are disclosed to or known by: (1) the corporation’s board of directors or a committee of the board of directors, and the board of directors or committee in good faith authorizes the contract or transaction by the approval of the majority of the disinterested directors or committee members, regardless of whether the disinterested directors or committee members constitute a quorum, or (2) the shareholders entitled to vote on the authorization of the contract or transaction, and the contract or transaction is specifically approved in good faith by a vote of the shareholders, or (b) the contract or transaction is fair to the corporation when the contract or | ||||
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Issue | Delaware | Texas | ||||
controlling stockholder or control group and safe harbor procedures that can be followed to insulate from challenge specified acts or transactions from which a controlling stockholder or control group receives a unique benefit. A controlling stockholder transaction that does not constitute a “going private transaction” may be entitled to the statutory safe harbor protection if it is (i) approved or recommended for approval by a majority of the directors serving on a committee of disinterested directors expressly delegated the authority to negotiate (or oversee the negotiation of) and to reject the controlling stockholder transaction, acting in good faith, without gross negligence and with knowledge of the material facts, (ii) approved or ratified by the informed and uncoerced vote of a majority of the votes cast by the disinterested stockholders entitled to vote thereon and is conditioned on such approval or ratification at or prior to the time it is submitted to stockholders, or (iii) fair to the corporation and its stockholders. A controlling stockholder transaction that constitutes a “going private transaction” may be entitled to the statutory safe harbor protection if items (i) and (ii) of the foregoing sentence are both obtained or the act or transaction is fair to the corporation and its stockholders. The DGCL provides criteria for determining the disinterestedness of directors and stockholders and provides for a rebuttable presumption of independence for directors that satisfy exchange rules for independence. | transaction is authorized, approved, or ratified by the board of directors, a committee of the board of directors, or the shareholders. The TBOC differs from the DGCL’s interested party transaction statute in that it expressly provides that if at least one of the above conditions is satisfied, neither the 21.419 Corporation nor any of the 21.419 Corporation’s shareholders will have a cause of action against any of the 21.419 Corporation’s directors or officers for breach of duty with respect to the making, authorization, or performance of the contract or transaction because the person had an applicable relationship or interest, unless the cause of action is permitted by Section 21.419 of the TBOC. | |||||
Increasing or Decreasing Authorized Capital Stock, Including Number of Unissued Shares of a Series of Preferred Stock | Under the DGCL, except as provided below, the board cannot increase or decrease the amount of authorized capital stock without stockholder approval unless the increase in the number of authorized shares is in connection with a forward stock split, in which case the number of authorized shares can be increased up to an amount proportionate to the subdivision without | Under the TBOC, once stock has been issued, the board cannot unilaterally increase or decrease the amount of authorized capital stock without shareholder approval unless (i) the increase in the number of authorized shares is in connection with a forward stock split, in which case the number of authorized shares can be increased to an amount proportionate to the same | ||||
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Issue | Delaware | Texas | ||||
stockholder approval, provided that the corporation only has one class of stock outstanding and such class is not divided into series (unless stockholder approval is expressly required by the certificate of incorporation). Under Section 242(b)(2) of the DGCL, a separate class vote is required by default to increase or decrease the authorized shares of a class of stock, but the Delaware Charter contains a provision opting out of this class vote requirement. See “Comparison of Stockholder Rights under Delaware and Texas Law — Charter Amendments” below. Unless otherwise provided in any certificate of designations designating any series of preferred stock, the number of shares of stock of any such series may be increased (but not above the total number of authorized shares of the class) or decreased (but not below the number of shares thereof then outstanding) by resolution of the board of directors upon the filing of a certificate of increase or decrease with the Delaware Secretary of State. Unless otherwise provided in the certificate of incorporation, when no shares of any such series of preferred stock are outstanding, either because none were issued or because no issued shares of any series remain outstanding, the board of directors may eliminate such series of preferred stock by resolution of the board of directors upon the filing of a certificate with the Delaware Secretary of State. | multiple by which the number of issued shares is subdivided as a result of the forward stock split without shareholder approval, or (ii) the decrease is in connection with a reverse stock split primarily for the purpose of maintaining the listing eligibility of the class of shares on any applicable national securities exchange, in which case the number of authorized shares can be decreased to an amount proportionate to the same multiple by which the number of issued shares is combined as a result of the reverse stock split without shareholder approval, provided in both cases that the corporation only has one class of stock outstanding and such class is not divided into series (unless shareholder approval is expressly required by the certificate of formation). With respect to a series of shares of preferred stock established by the board of directors if authorized by the corporation’s certificate of formation (and subject thereto), unless the certificate of formation expressly restricts the board of directors from increasing or decreasing the number of unissued shares of a series to be established by the board of directors, the board of directors may increase or decrease the number of shares in each series to be established, except that the board of directors may not decrease the number of shares in a particular series to a number that is less than the number of shares in that series that are issued at the time of the decrease. | |||||
Number of Directors | Under the DGCL, the number of directors shall be fixed by, or in the manner provided in, the bylaws, unless the certificate of incorporation fixes the number of directors. If the certificate of incorporation fixes the number of directors, then a change in the number of directors shall be made only by amendment of the certificate of incorporation. | Under the TBOC, the number of directors shall be set by, or in the manner provided by, the certificate of formation or bylaws, except that the number of directors on the initial board of directors must be set by the certificate of formation. The number of directors may be increased or decreased by amendment to, or as provided by, the certificate of formation or bylaws. | ||||
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Issue | Delaware | Texas | ||||
If the certificate of formation or bylaws do not set the number constituting the board of directors or provide for the manner in which the number of directors must be determined, the number of directors is the same as the number constituting the initial board of directors as set by the certificate of formation. | ||||||
Procedures for Filling Vacant Directorships | Under the DGCL, unless otherwise provided in the certificate of incorporation or bylaws: (i) vacancies and newly created directorships resulting from any increase in the authorized number of directors elected by all of the stockholders having the right to vote as a single class may be filled by a majority of the directors then in office, although less than a quorum, or by a sole remaining director; and (ii) whenever the holders of any class or classes of stock or series thereof are entitled to elect one or more directors by the certificate of incorporation, vacancies and newly created directorships of such class or classes or series may be filled by a majority of the directors elected by such class or classes or series thereof then in office, or by a sole remaining director so elected. In the case of a Delaware corporation the directors of which are divided into classes, all directors chosen under (i) or (ii) of the above shall hold office until the next election of the class for which such directors shall have been chosen, and until their successors shall be elected and qualified. For more information on the procedures for filling vacant directorships under the Delaware Charter, see “— Certain Differences Between the Delaware Charter and Bylaws and the Texas Charter and Bylaws — Procedures for Filling Vacant Directorships” above. | Under the TBOC, except as provided below with respect to class voting, vacancies may be filled by the affirmative vote of the majority of the remaining directors, even if less than a quorum, or by the election at an annual or special meeting of shareholders called for that purpose. The term of a director elected to fill a vacancy occurring in the board of directors is the unexpired term of the director’s predecessor in office. Except as provided below with respect to class voting, a directorship to be filled because of an increase in the number of directors may be filled by the shareholders or by the board of directors for a term of office continuing only until the next election of one or more directors by the shareholders. The board of directors may not fill more than two such directorships during the period between any two successive annual meetings of shareholders. Unless otherwise authorized by a corporation’s certificate of formation, a vacancy or a newly created vacancy in a director position that the certificate of formation entitles the holders of a class or series of shares or group of classes or series of shares to elect may be filled only: (i) by the affirmative vote of the majority of the directors then in office elected by the class, series, or group; (ii) by the sole remaining director elected in that manner; or (iii) by the affirmative vote of the holders of the outstanding shares of the class, series, or group. | ||||
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Issue | Delaware | Texas | ||||
For more information on the procedures for filling vacant directorships under the Texas Charter, see “— Certain Differences Between the Delaware Charter and Bylaws and the Texas Charter and Bylaws — Procedures for Filling Vacant Directorships” above. | ||||||
Committees | Under the DGCL, the board of directors may, by resolution adopted by a majority of the whole board, designate one or more committees, each consisting of one or more directors of the corporation. The board may also designate one or more director(s) as alternate committee members who can replace any absent or disqualified member at any committee meeting. The board or the bylaws of the corporation can authorize any committee to have and to exercise all the powers and authority of the board in the management of the business and affairs of the corporation, but no committee of a corporation shall have the power or authority in reference to the following matters: (i) approving or adopting or recommending to the stockholders, any action or matter (other than the election or removal of directors) expressly required by this chapter to be submitted to stockholders for approval or (ii) adopting, amending or repealing any bylaw of the corporation. | Under the TBOC, the board of directors may designate committees composed of one or more directors if authorized by the certificate of formation or the bylaws of the corporation. Once appointed, a committee has the full authority of the board of directors, though such authority may be limited by the resolution that created the committee, the certificate of formation, the bylaws, or the TBOC. A committee cannot (i) amend the certificate of formation, except to establish a series of shares, change the number of shares in a series, or eliminate a series of shares; (ii) propose a reduction of stated capital; (iii) approve a plan of merger, share exchange, or conversion; (iv) recommend to the shareholders the sale, lease, or exchange of all or substantially all of the property and assets of the corporation not made in the ordinary course of business; (v) recommend to the shareholders a voluntary winding up and termination or revocation of such action; (vi) amend, adopt, or repeal bylaws; (vii) fill board vacancies; (viii) fill committee vacancies or designate alternate committee members; (ix) fill vacancies due to an increase in the number of directors; (x) elect or remove officers or committee members; (xi) set committee member compensation; or (xii) alter or repeal a board resolution that states that the board resolution cannot be amended or repealed by a committee. The board of directors of a 21.419 Corporation may adopt resolutions that authorize the formation of a committee of independent and disinterested directors to review and approve transactions, whether or not | ||||
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Issue | Delaware | Texas | ||||
contemplated at the time of the committee’s formation or a petition under Section 21.4161 of the TBOC, involving the 21.419 Corporation or any of its subsidiaries and a controlling shareholder, director, or officer. | ||||||
Special Meetings of the Stockholders | Under the DGCL, the board of directors, or any other one or more persons authorized in the certificate of incorporation or bylaws, may call a special meeting of stockholders. Stockholders do not have a default statutory right to call a special meeting, but the certificate of incorporation or bylaws for the corporation may provide for such right. The Delaware Charter and Bylaws do not provide such a right. | Under the TBOC, special meetings of the shareholders of a corporation may be called by: (i) the president, the board of directors, or any other person authorized to call special meetings by the certificate of formation or bylaws of the corporation; or (ii) the holders of the percentage of shares specified in the certificate of formation, not to exceed 50% of the shares entitled to vote or, if no percentage is specified, at least 10% of all of the shares of the corporation entitled to vote at the proposed special meeting. Under the TBOC, a corporation cannot prohibit its shareholders from calling a special meeting of shareholders. For more information on the stockholder special meeting rights provided in the Texas Charter, see “— Certain Differences Between the Delaware Charter and Bylaws and the Texas Charter and Bylaws — Special Meetings of Stockholders” above. | ||||
Adjournment of Stockholder Meetings | Under the DGCL, unless the bylaws provide otherwise, a meeting of stockholders may be adjourned to another time or place without notice if the time, place, if any, and the means of remote communications, if any, by which stockholders and proxy holders may be deemed to be present in person and vote at such adjourned meeting are: (i) announced at the meeting at which the adjournment is taken; (ii) displayed, during the time scheduled for the meeting, on the same electronic network used to enable stockholders and proxy holders to participate in the meeting by means of remote communication; or (iii) set forth in the notice of meeting. | Under the TBOC, unless the certificate of formation or bylaws provide otherwise, a meeting of shareholders may be adjourned due to lack of quorum until the time and to the place as may be determined by a vote of the holders of the majority of the shares who are present or represented by proxy at the meeting. The TBOC does not have a specific provision on the notice for an adjourned meeting or the business that may be transacted at an adjourned meeting. Generally, under the TBOC, the only business that may be conducted at a special meeting of the shareholders is business that is within the purpose or | ||||
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Issue | Delaware | Texas | ||||
Under the DGCL, if a meeting of stockholders is adjourned for more than 30 days, or if after the adjournment a new record date for stockholders entitled to vote is fixed for the adjourned meeting, notice of the adjourned meeting must be given to each stockholder of record entitled to vote at the meeting, or each stockholder of record entitled to vote at the adjourned meeting as of the new record date set for notice of the adjourned meeting, respectively. At the adjourned meeting the corporation may transact any business that might have been transacted at the original meeting. | purposes described in the notice. | |||||
Voting by Proxy | Under the DGCL, each stockholder entitled to vote at a meeting of stockholders (or to act by written consent in lieu of a meeting) may authorize another person or persons to act for such stockholder by proxy. A proxy is valid for three years from its date unless a longer period is provided in the proxy. | Under the TBOC, a shareholder may authorize another person or persons to act for such shareholder by proxy. A proxy is valid for eleven months from its date of execution unless a longer period is provided in the proxy. | ||||
Quorum and Required Vote | Under the DGCL, the certificate of incorporation or bylaws of any Delaware corporation authorized to issue stock may specify the number of shares and/or the amount of other securities having voting power the holders of which must be present or represented by proxy at any meeting in order to constitute a quorum for, and the votes that shall be necessary for, the transaction of any business, but in no event shall a quorum consist of less than one-third of the shares entitled to vote at the meeting, except that, where a separate vote by a class or series or classes or series is required, a quorum shall consist of no less than one-third of the shares of such class or series or classes or series. The Delaware Bylaws provide that the holders of a majority of the voting power of all the outstanding shares of stock of the Delaware Corporation | Under the TBOC, subject to the following sentence, the holders of the majority of the shares entitled to vote at a meeting of the shareholders of a Texas corporation that are present or represented by proxy at the meeting are a quorum for the consideration of a matter to be presented at that meeting. The certificate of formation of a corporation may provide that a quorum is present only if: (i) the holders of a specified portion of the shares that is greater than the majority of the shares entitled to vote are represented at the meeting in person or by proxy; or (ii) the holders of a specified portion of the shares that is less than the majority but not less than one-third of the shares entitled to vote are represented at the meeting in person or by proxy. The Texas Bylaws provide that the holders of a majority of the voting power of all the outstanding shares of | ||||
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Issue | Delaware | Texas | ||||
entitled to vote at the meeting, represented in person or by proxy, shall constitute a quorum at a meeting of stockholders, except that when specified business is to be voted on by a class or series of stock voting as a class, the holders of a majority of the voting power of all of the outstanding shares of such class or series, represented in person or by proxy, shall constitute a quorum of such class or series for the transaction of such business. In the absence of such specification in the certificate of incorporation or bylaws of the corporation: (i) a majority in voting power of the shares entitled to vote, present in person or represented by proxy, shall constitute a quorum at a meeting of stockholders; (ii) in all matters other than the election of directors, the affirmative vote of the majority in voting power of shares present in person or represented by proxy at the meeting and entitled to vote on the subject matter shall be the act of the stockholders; (iii) directors shall be elected by a plurality of the votes of the shares present in person or represented by proxy at the meeting and entitled to vote on the election of directors; and (iv) where a separate vote by a class or series or classes or series is required, a majority in voting power of the outstanding shares of such class or series or classes or series, present in person or represented by proxy, shall constitute a quorum entitled to take action with respect to that vote on that matter and, in all matters other than the election of directors, the affirmative vote of the majority of shares of such class or series or classes or series present in person or represented by proxy at the meeting shall be the act of such class or series or classes or series. The Delaware Bylaws provide that, subject to the rights of the holders of any series of Preferred Stock, directors shall be elected by a plurality of the votes cast by the holders of shares | stock of the Texas Corporation entitled to vote at the meeting, represented in person or by proxy, shall constitute a quorum at a meeting of stockholders, except that when specified business is to be voted on by a class or series of stock voting as a class, the holders of a majority of the voting power of all of the outstanding shares of such class or series, represented in person or by proxy, shall constitute a quorum of such class or series for the transaction of such business. The certificate of formation or bylaws of a corporation may provide that a director of a corporation shall be elected only if the director receives: (i) the vote of the holders of a specified portion, but not less than the majority, of the shares entitled to vote in the election of directors; (ii) the vote of the holders of a specified portion, but not less than the majority, of the shares entitled to vote in the election of directors and represented in person or by proxy at a meeting of shareholders at which a quorum is present; or (iii) the vote of the holders of a specified portion, but not less than the majority, of the votes cast by the holders of shares entitled to vote in the election of directors at a meeting of shareholders at which a quorum is present. If no standard is specified, directors of a corporation shall be elected by a plurality of the votes cast. The Texas Bylaws provide that, subject to the rights of the holders of any series of Preferred Stock, directors shall be elected by a plurality of the votes cast by the holders of shares present in person or represented by proxy at the meeting and entitled to vote in such election. Subject to the following sentence, with respect to a matter other than the election of directors or a matter for which the affirmative vote of the holders of a specified portion of the shares entitled to vote is required by the TBOC, the affirmative vote of the | |||||
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Issue | Delaware | Texas | ||||
present in person or represented by proxy at the meeting and entitled to vote in such election. The Delaware Bylaws further provide that, in non-binding advisory matters with more than two possible vote choices, the plurality of the votes cast by the holders of outstanding shares of stock of the Delaware Corporation present in person or represented by proxy at the meeting and entitled to vote on the matter shall be the recommendation of the stockholders. For all other matters, unless a different or minimum vote is required, the Delaware Bylaws provide that the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the voting power of the outstanding shares of stock of the Delaware Corporation present in person or represented by proxy at the meeting and entitled to vote on the matter shall be the act of the stockholders. A bylaw amendment adopted by stockholders which specifies the votes that shall be necessary for the election of directors shall not be further amended or repealed by the board of directors. | holders of the majority of the shares entitled to vote on, and who voted for, against, or expressly abstained with respect to, the matter at a shareholders’ meeting of a corporation at which a quorum is present is the act of the shareholders. With respect to a matter other than the election of directors or a matter for which the affirmative vote of the holders of a specified portion of the shares entitled to vote is required by the TBOC, the certificate of formation or bylaws of a corporation may provide that the act of the shareholders of the corporation is: (i) the affirmative vote of the holders of a specified portion, but not less than the majority, of the shares entitled to vote on that matter; (ii) the affirmative vote of the holders of a specified portion, but not less than the majority, of the shares entitled to vote on that matter and represented in person or by proxy at a shareholders’ meeting at which a quorum is present; (iii) the affirmative vote of the holders of a specified portion, but not less than the majority, of the shares entitled to vote on, and who voted for or against, the matter at a shareholders’ meeting at which a quorum is present; or (iv) the affirmative vote of the holders of a specified portion, but not less than the majority, of the shares entitled to vote on, and who voted for, against, or expressly abstained with respect to, the matter at a shareholders’ meeting at which a quorum is present. The Texas Bylaws provide that, in non-binding advisory matters with more than two possible vote choices, the plurality of the votes cast by the holders of outstanding shares of stock of the Texas Corporation present in person or represented by proxy at the meeting and entitled to vote on the matter shall be the recommendation of the stockholders. For all other matters, unless a different or minimum vote is required, the Texas Bylaws provide that the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the voting power of the outstanding shares of stock of the Texas | |||||
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Issue | Delaware | Texas | ||||
Corporation present in person or represented by proxy at the meeting and entitled to vote on the matter shall be the act of the stockholders. | ||||||
Stockholder Vote for Fundamental Business Transactions | Under the DGCL, a majority in voting power of the outstanding stock of the corporation entitled to vote thereon generally must approve fundamental changes, such as: (i) certain mergers or consolidations; (ii) a sale, lease, or exchange of all or substantially all of the corporation’s assets (provided that no stockholder authorization or consent is required (a) to mortgage or pledge the corporation’s property and assets unless the certificate of incorporation so requires or (b) where the property or assets in the sale, lease or exchange is collateral that secures a mortgage or is pledged to a secured party and certain additional conditions are met); (iii) dissolution; (iv) conversion of a domestic corporation to other entities; and (v) transfer, domestication or continuance of a domestic corporation to a foreign jurisdiction. The certificate of incorporation may contain provisions requiring for any corporate action the vote of a larger portion of the stock or of any class or series thereof than is required by the DGCL. There is no specific quantity or percentage that definitively governs whether a given portion of assets to be sold constitutes substantially all of assets. Instead, the inquiry hinges on a fact-intensive evaluation of whether the assets to be sold are quantitatively and qualitatively vital to the business of the corporation. For more information on the stockholder vote requirements for fundamental business transactions under the Delaware Charter, see “— Certain Differences Between the Delaware Charter and Bylaws and the Texas Charter and Bylaws — Stockholder Vote for Fundamental Business Transactions and Charter Amendments” above. | Under the TBOC, unless otherwise provided for in the TBOC or the certificate of formation of a corporation, shareholders holding at least two-thirds of the outstanding shares entitled to vote on the matter must typically approve fundamental business transactions such as: (i) a merger; (ii) an exchange; (iii) a conversion; or (iv) a sale of all or substantially all of the corporation’s assets that is not made in the usual and regular course of the corporation’s business. No approval is required, however, for a sale of assets made in the usual and regular course of the corporation’s business. Under the TBOC, even the transfer of substantially all of a corporation’s assets is deemed not to require shareholder approval if the corporation continues directly or indirectly to engage in one or more businesses. The certificate of formation can provide for a different threshold of approval for fundamental business transactions, but not less than a majority of the shares entitled to vote. Except as otherwise provided by the TBOC, if a class or series of shares is entitled to vote as a class or series on a fundamental business transaction, the affirmative vote of the holders of at least two-thirds of the outstanding shares in each such class or series of shares entitled to vote on the transaction as a class or series is also required to approve the fundamental business transaction, unless a different threshold, not less than a majority, is specified in the certificate of formation. Shares entitled to vote as a class or series are only entitled to vote as a class or series on the fundamental business transaction unless that class or series is otherwise entitled to vote on each matter submitted to the shareholders generally | ||||
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Issue | Delaware | Texas | ||||
or is otherwise entitled to vote under the certificate of formation. The TBOC allows a corporation to provide in its certificate of formation that all shares vote as a single class for the purpose of approving any matter, even in transactions that would otherwise require approval by separate class vote. For more information on the stockholder vote requirements for fundamental business transactions under the Texas Charter, see “— Certain Differences Between the Delaware Charter and Bylaws and the Texas Charter and Bylaws — Stockholder Vote for Fundamental Business Transactions and Charter Amendments” above. | ||||||
Business Combinations Statute | Under the DGCL, unless a Delaware corporation’s certificate of incorporation or bylaws (original, or approved by stockholders) provide otherwise, Delaware corporations that have a class of voting stock listed on a national securities exchange or held of record by 2,000 or more persons are prohibited from entering into any “business combination” with any “interested stockholder” for a period of three years following the time that such stockholder became an interested stockholder. The DGCL generally defines a “business combination” when used in reference to any corporation and any interested stockholder of such corporation as (i) certain mergers and consolidations; (ii) sales, leases, exchanges, mortgages, pledges, transfers or other dispositions of assets having an aggregate market value of 10% or more of either the consolidated assets or the outstanding stock of the corporation or any majority-owned subsidiary of the corporation; (iii) certain transactions that would result in the issuance or transfer of stock of the corporation or any majority-owned subsidiary of the corporation to an interested stockholder; (iv) certain | Under the TBOC, a Texas “issuing public corporation” is generally prohibited from, directly or indirectly, entering into (i) mergers, share exchanges or conversions with an affiliated shareholder or other entity that after such transaction would be an affiliate or associate of an affiliated shareholder, and certain other entities, (ii) sales, leases, exchanges, mortgages, pledges, transfers or other dispositions of assets having an aggregate market value of 10% or more of (a) the aggregate market value of the consolidated assets of such corporation, (b) the aggregate market value of the outstanding voting stock of such corporation or (c) the earning power or net income of such corporation on a consolidated basis, (iii) certain transactions that would result in the issuance or transfer of shares of such corporation to an affiliated shareholder or an affiliate or associate, (iv) liquidation or dissolution plans or proposals with an affiliated shareholder or an associate or an affiliate of an associate of an affiliated shareholder, (v) certain transactions, including reclassifications of securities or other share distributions or recapitalizations, | ||||
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Issue | Delaware | Texas | ||||
transactions that have the effect, directly or indirectly, of increasing the proportionate share of stock of the corporation or any majority-owned subsidiary of the corporation which is owned by the interested stockholder, subject to exceptions; and (v) any receipt by the interested stockholder of the benefit, directly or indirectly, of any loans, advances, guarantees, pledges or other financial benefits provided by or through the corporation or any majority-owned subsidiary of the corporation, subject to certain exceptions. “Interested stockholder” is generally defined as a person (including the affiliates and associates of such person) that is directly or indirectly a beneficial owner of 15% or more of the outstanding voting stock of the corporation or is an affiliate or associate of the corporation and was the owner of 15% or more of the outstanding voting stock of the corporation at any time within the three-year period before the date on which it is sought to be determined whether such person is an interested stockholder, and the affiliates and associates of such person, in each case subject to certain exceptions. The DGCL provides an exception to this prohibition if: (i) the corporation’s board of directors approved either the business combination or the transaction in which the interested stockholder became an interested stockholder prior to the time the interested stockholder became an interested stockholder; (ii) the interested stockholder acquired at least 85% of the voting stock of that company (excluding shares owned by persons who are directors and also officers, and employee stock plans in which participants do not have the right to determine whether shares will be tendered in a tender or exchange offer) in the transaction in which it became an interested stockholder; or (iii) the business combination is approved by the board of directors and the affirmative vote of at least two-thirds of | that have the effect, directly or indirectly, of increasing the proportionate ownership percentage of the outstanding shares of a class or series of voting shares or securities convertible into voting shares of the issuing public corporation that is beneficially owned by the affiliated shareholder or an affiliate or associate of the affiliated shareholder, except as a result of immaterial changes due to fractional share adjustments or (vi) loans, advances, guarantees, pledges, or other financial assistance or a tax credit or other tax advantages the recipient of which is an affiliated shareholder or an affiliate or associate of an affiliated shareholder, in each case, with an “affiliated shareholder” or any affiliate or associate of the “affiliated shareholder” for a period of three years after the date the shareholder obtained “affiliated shareholder” status. “Affiliated shareholder” is generally broadly defined as a person who beneficially owns (or has owned within the preceding three-year period) 20% or more of the outstanding voting stock of an issuing public corporation. “Issuing public corporation” means a Texas corporation that has: (i) 100 or more shareholders of record as shown by the share transfer records of the corporation; (ii) a class or series of the corporation’s voting shares registered under the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. Section 77b et seq.), as amended; or (iii) a class or series of the corporation’s voting shares qualified for trading on a national securities exchange. The TBOC provides an exception to this prohibition if: (i) the board of directors of the corporation approves the transaction or the acquisition of shares by the affiliated shareholder prior to the affiliated shareholder becoming an affiliated shareholder; or (ii) the holders of at least two-thirds of the outstanding voting shares not | |||||
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Issue | Delaware | Texas | ||||
the votes entitled to be cast by disinterested stockholders at an annual or special meeting (and not by written consent). A corporation may expressly elect in its certificate of incorporation to not be governed by this statute. The Delaware Charter provides that the Delaware Corporation will not be governed by this statute until certain conditions exist. For more information, see “— Certain Differences Between the Delaware Charter and Bylaws and the Texas Charter and Bylaws — Restrictions on Business Combinations” above. | beneficially owned by the affiliated shareholder or an affiliate or associate of the affiliated shareholder approve the transaction at a meeting held no earlier than six months after the shareholder acquires such ownership. The TBOC expressly provides that the foregoing shareholder approval may not be by written consent. A corporation may expressly elect in its certificate of formation to not be governed by this statute. The Texas Charter provides that the Texas Corporation will not be governed by this statute until certain conditions exist. For more information, see “— Certain Differences Between the Delaware Charter and Bylaws and the Texas Charter and Bylaws — Restrictions on Business Combinations” above. | |||||
Charter Amendments | Under the DGCL, subject to limited exceptions, an amendment to the certificate of incorporation must be approved by (i) the board of directors and (ii) the holders of a majority in voting power of the corporation’s outstanding stock entitled to vote thereon, unless the certificate of incorporation provides for a greater number or adds additional class or series votes. Whether or not entitled to vote by the certificate of incorporation, the holders of the outstanding shares of a class are entitled to vote as a class on a proposed amendment, if the amendment would (i) increase or decrease the aggregate number of authorized shares of such class; (ii) increase or decrease the par value of the shares of such class; or (iii) alter or change the powers, preferences, or special rights of the shares of such class so as to affect them adversely. However, the DGCL permits corporations to provide in their certificate of incorporation, and the Delaware Charter so provides, that no separate class vote(s) shall be required to increase or decrease the aggregate number of | Under the TBOC, subject to limited exceptions, an amendment to the certificate of formation requires the approval of (i) the board of directors and (ii) the holders of at least two-thirds of the outstanding shares of the Texas corporation entitled to vote thereon, unless a different threshold, not less than a majority, is specified in the certificate of formation. If a class or series of shares is entitled to vote as a class or series on an amendment to the certificate of formation, the affirmative vote of the holders of at least two-thirds (unless a different threshold, not less than a majority, is specified in the certificate of formation) of the outstanding shares in each such class or series of shares entitled to vote on the amendment as a class or series is also required to approve an amendment to the certificate of formation, although the TBOC allows corporations to provide in their certificate of formation that all shares vote as a single class for such an amendment. In addition, the TBOC allows corporations to provide in their certificate of formation, and the Texas Charter so provides, that no | ||||
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Issue | Delaware | Texas | ||||
authorized shares of such class, in which case a share increase/decrease amendment would instead be approved by the holders of all outstanding shares, voting together as a single class. In addition, the DGCL provides that unless otherwise expressly required by the certificate of incorporation: (i) no meeting or vote of stockholders is required to adopt an amendment that reclassifies by subdividing the issued shares of a class of stock into a greater number of issued shares of the same class of stock (and, in connection therewith, such amendment may increase the number of authorized shares of such class of stock up to an amount proportionate to the subdivision), provided the corporation has only one class of stock outstanding and such class is not divided into series; and (ii) an amendment to increase or decrease the authorized number of shares of a class of capital stock or an amendment to reclassify by combining the issued shares of a class of capital stock into a lesser number of issued shares of the same class of stock may be made and effected, without obtaining the vote or votes of stockholders otherwise required if: (a) the shares of such class are listed on a national securities exchange immediately before such amendment becomes effective and meet the listing requirements of such national securities exchange relating to the minimum number of holders immediately after such amendment becomes effective, (b) at a properly called meeting, a vote of the stockholders entitled to vote thereon, voting as a single class, is taken for and against the proposed amendment, and the votes cast for the amendment exceed the votes cast against the amendment, and (c) if the amendment increases or decreases the authorized number of shares of a class of capital stock for which no provision in the certificate of incorporation has been made in accordance with the DGCL, the votes cast for the amendment by the | separate class vote(s) shall be required to increase or decrease the aggregate number of authorized shares of a class, in which case a share increase/decrease amendment would instead be approved by the holders of a majority of all outstanding shares entitled to vote thereon, voting together as a single class. For more information on requirements for charter amendments under the Texas Charter, see “— Certain Differences Between the Delaware Charter and Bylaws and the Texas Charter and Bylaws — Stockholder Vote for Fundamental Business Transactions and Charter Amendments” above. | |||||
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Issue | Delaware | Texas | ||||
holders of such class exceed the votes cast against the amendment by the holders of such class. For more information on requirements for charter amendments under the Delaware Charter, see “— Certain Differences Between the Delaware Charter and Bylaws and the Texas Charter and Bylaws — Stockholder Vote for Fundamental Business Transactions and Charter Amendments” above. | ||||||
Bylaw Amendments | Under the DGCL, stockholders of a Delaware corporation entitled to vote have the right to amend, repeal or adopt the bylaws. If a Delaware corporation’s certificate of incorporation so provides, the Delaware corporation’s board of directors may also have the right to amend, repeal or adopt the bylaws. The Delaware Charter provides that the Board is expressly authorized to adopt, amend or repeal the Delaware Bylaws. | Generally, under the TBOC, the board of directors may amend, repeal or adopt bylaws. However, the shareholders may amend, repeal or adopt bylaws even if the directors also have that power, and a Texas corporation’s certificate of formation may wholly or partly reserve the power to amend, repeal or adopt bylaws exclusively to the shareholders. Similarly, the shareholders, in amending, repealing or adopting a particular bylaw, may expressly provide that the board of directors may not amend, readopt or repeal that bylaw. The Texas Charter provides that the Board is expressly authorized to adopt, amend or repeal the Texas Bylaws. | ||||
Dividends and Distributions | Under the DGCL, a Delaware corporation may, subject to any restrictions contained in its certificate of incorporation, pay dividends out of surplus (as determined under the DGCL) or, if there is no surplus, out of net profits for the current and/or the preceding fiscal year, unless the capital of the corporation is less than the capital represented by issued and outstanding stock having preferences on asset distributions. A Delaware corporation may not pay dividends if doing so would render the corporation insolvent in the sense that its liabilities exceed its assets or it could not pay its debts as they come due, and also may not pay dividends if doing so would impair the corporation’s ability to | Under the TBOC, a distribution is defined as a transfer of cash or other property (except a corporation’s own shares or rights to acquire its shares or a split-up or division of the issued shares of a class of a corporation into a larger number of shares within the same class that does not increase the stated capital of the corporation), or an issuance of debt, by a corporation to its shareholders in the form of: (i) a dividend on any class or series of a Texas corporation’s outstanding shares; (ii) a purchase or redemption, directly or indirectly, of its shares; or (iii) a payment in liquidation of all or a portion of its assets. Under the TBOC, a Texas corporation may not make a distribution if such | ||||
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Issue | Delaware | Texas | ||||
continue as a going concern. | distribution violates its certificate of formation, if the corporation’s surplus is less than the amount of the corporation’s stated capital (as determined by the TBOC) or, unless a Texas corporation is in receivership or the distribution is made in connection with the winding up and termination of the Texas corporation, if it either renders the Texas corporation unable to pay its debts as they become due in the course of its business or affairs, or exceeds, depending on the type of distribution, either the net assets or the surplus of the Texas corporation, or, subject to certain exceptions, if the distribution will be made to shareholders of another class or series. | |||||
Stock Redemption and Repurchase | Under the DGCL, a Delaware corporation may purchase or redeem shares of any class except when its capital is impaired or would be impaired by such purchase or redemption. A Delaware corporation may, however, purchase or redeem out of capital any of its own shares that are entitled upon any distribution of its assets, whether by dividend or in liquidation, to a preference over another class or series of its stock, or, if no shares entitled to such a preference are outstanding, any of its own shares, if such shares are to be retired upon their acquisition and the capital of the corporation reduced. However, a corporation may not purchase redeemable shares for a price greater than that at which they may then be redeemed. In addition, a Delaware corporation may not effect a repurchase or redemption if doing so would render the corporation insolvent in the sense that its liabilities exceed its assets or it could not pay its debts as they come due, and also may not repurchase or redeem shares if doing so would impair the corporation’s ability to continue as a going concern. | As noted above, under the TBOC, the purchase or redemption by a Texas corporation of its shares constitutes a distribution. Accordingly, the discussion above relating to distributions is applicable to stock redemptions and repurchases. | ||||
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Issue | Delaware | Texas | ||||
Ratification | Under the DGCL, there is a codified ratification process for defective corporate actions. The board of directors must adopt a resolution ratifying the defective corporate action and, if stockholder approval would have been required for the defective corporate action to have been taken, the defective corporate action must be submitted to stockholders for approval. In addition to the foregoing, under the DGCL, the corporation, any successor entity to the corporation, any director, or certain stockholders may apply to the Delaware Court of Chancery for an order determining the validity and effectiveness of defective corporate acts, including, without limitation, to confirm whether a prior ratification was valid and effective and whether a defective corporate act may be validated even if not previously ratified. In connection with such applications, the Delaware Court of Chancery has broad discretion to fashion appropriate relief, including, without limitation, declaring ratifications effective, validating and declaring effective any defective corporate act, and making such other orders regarding such matters as it deems proper under the circumstances. | Under the TBOC, there is a codified ratification process for defective corporate acts. The board of directors must adopt a resolution and then submit the ratified defective corporate act for shareholder approval (which shareholder approval is subject to certain exceptions). In the absence of actual fraud in the transaction, the judgment of the board of directors of a Texas corporation that shares of the Texas corporation are valid shares or putative shares is conclusive, unless otherwise determined by a Texas district court or the Texas Business Court. | ||||
Inspection of Books and Records | Under the DGCL, any stockholder may inspect, and make copies and extracts from, a Delaware corporation’s books and records during normal business hours for any proper purpose (defined to mean a purpose reasonably related to the stockholder’s interest as a stockholder) upon written demand under oath stating the purpose of the inspection. The DGCL defines “books and records” to mean a specific set of materials that includes the governing documents, certain agreements with stockholders, minutes of certain board and stockholder meetings, certain communications with stockholders generally within the three years | Under the TBOC, a shareholder may inspect certain books and records of a Texas corporation during normal business hours upon written demand stating a proper purpose if such shareholder holds at least 5% of the outstanding shares of stock of the Texas corporation or has been a holder of shares for at least six months prior to such demand. If a Texas corporation refuses to allow a person to examine and make copies of account records, minutes, and share transfer records under the TBOC, the Texas corporation is liable to the shareholder for any cost or expense, including attorney’s fees, incurred in | ||||
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Issue | Delaware | Texas | ||||
preceding the date of the demand, certain actions by written consent of the board and stockholders, annual financial statements for the three years preceding the date of the demand and director and officer independence questionnaires. The stockholder may only inspect books and records if the stockholder’s demand is made in good faith, is for a proper purpose, describes with reasonable particularity the stockholder’s purpose and the books and records sought, and the books and records sought are specifically related to the stockholder’s purpose. The DGCL provides that the corporation may impose reasonable restrictions on the confidentiality, use, and distribution of books and records and may require, as a condition to producing books and records, that the stockholder stipulate that any books and records received are deemed incorporated by reference in any follow-on complaint in a plenary action relating to the subject matter of the demand. The corporation may redact portions of any books and records produced to the stockholder to the extent the portions so redacted are not specifically related to the stockholder’s purpose If a Delaware corporation refuses to permit inspection or does not reply to the demand within five business days after the demand has been made, the stockholder may apply to the Delaware Court of Chancery for an order to compel such inspection. The Delaware Court of Chancery has exclusive jurisdiction to determine whether or not the person seeking inspection of books and records is entitled to the inspection sought. The Delaware Court of Chancery may not order inspection of any documents beyond those defined as “books and records” unless either of two exceptions applies. First, if the | enforcing the shareholder’s rights under the TBOC to examine such materials. A Texas corporation may defend against an inspection action by establishing that the shareholder: (i) has sold or offered for sale, or has aided or abetted a person in procuring a list of shareholders or of holders of voting trust certificates for the purpose of selling, a list of shareholders or of holders of voting trust certificates for shares of the Texas corporation or any other corporation within the two years preceding the date the action is brought; (ii) has improperly used information obtained through prior examination of the books, account records, minutes, or share transfer records of the corporation or any other corporation; or (iii) was not acting in good faith or for a proper purpose in making the request. The TBOC (i) provides that emails, text messages, and social media information are not considered corporate records unless effectuating a corporate action and (ii) deems written demands from shareholders of a 21.419 Corporation to inspect corporate records to not be for proper purpose if they are made in connection with active or pending derivative suits or litigation involving the corporation as an adversarial party. | |||||
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Issue | Delaware | Texas | ||||
corporation does not have certain materials defined as “books and records,” the Delaware Court of Chancery may order the production of their functional equivalent only if and to the extent the stockholder has met other requirements of the books and records statute and only to the extent necessary and essential to fulfill the stockholder’s proper purpose. Second, the Delaware Court of Chancery may order production of additional materials only if and to the extent (i) the stockholder has met other requirements of the books and records statute, (ii) the stockholder made a showing of compelling need for inspecting such materials to further the stockholder’s proper purpose, and (iii) the stockholder has demonstrated by clear and convincing evidence that such specific materials are necessary and essential to further their proper purpose. | ||||||
Limitation of Personal Liability of Directors, Officers and Controlling Stockholders | Under the DGCL, a Delaware corporation is permitted to adopt a provision in its certificate of incorporation eliminating or limiting the personal liability of a director or officer to the corporation or its stockholders for monetary damages for breach of fiduciary duty as a director or officer, provided that such provision does not eliminate or limit the liability of: (i) a director or officer breaching the director’s or officer’s duty of loyalty to the corporation or its stockholders; (ii) a director or officer for acts or omissions not in good faith or which involve intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law; (iii) a director declaring an unlawful dividend or approving an unlawful stock purchase or redemption; (iv) a director or officer for any transaction from which they derived an improper personal benefit from the corporation; or (v) an officer in any action by or in the right of a Delaware corporation. The Delaware Charter contains | Under the TBOC, a Texas corporation is permitted to provide that a director or officer is not liable, or is liable only to the extent provided by the certificate of formation, to the corporation or its shareholders for monetary damages for an act or omission by the person in the person’s capacity as a director or officer, respectively. The TBOC does not, however, permit any limitation of the liability of a director or officer for: (i) a breach of the duty of loyalty to the corporation or its shareholders; (ii) an act or omission not in good faith that constitutes a breach of duty of the person to the corporation or involves intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law; (iii) a transaction from which the director or officer obtains an improper benefit, regardless of whether the benefit resulted from an action taken within the scope of the person’s duties; or (iv) an act or omission for which the liability of a director or officer is | ||||
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Issue | Delaware | Texas | ||||
provisions limiting the personal liability of directors and officers. For more information, see “— Certain Differences Between the Delaware Charter and Bylaws and the Texas Charter and Bylaws — Limitation of Personal Liability of Directors and Officers” above. The DGCL further provides that controlling stockholders and members of control groups, in their capacity as such, cannot be liable for monetary damages for breach of the fiduciary duty of care. | expressly provided by an applicable statute (such as wrongful distributions). The TBOC also provides that 21.419 Corporations and their shareholders would not have a cause of action against a director or officer of the 21.419 Corporation as a result of any act or failure to act, unless: (i) the presumption of the business judgment rule is rebutted; (ii) the director’s or officer’s act or failure to act constituted a breach of a fiduciary duty; and (iii) such breach involved fraud, intentional misconduct, an ultra vires act, or a knowing violation of law. The Texas Charter contains provisions limiting the personal liability of directors and officers. For more information, see “— Certain Differences Between the Delaware Charter and Bylaws and the Texas Charter and Bylaws — Limitation of Personal Liability of Directors and Officers” above. | |||||
Considerations by Directors Permitted by Statute | Under the DGCL, except for corporations that have opted to become public benefit corporations, directors of Delaware corporations do not have any express statutory authority to consider constituencies beyond the corporation’s stockholders, in their capacity as such, when discharging their fiduciary duties. Delaware case law provides that fiduciary duties generally require directors to seek to maximize the value of the corporation for the long-term benefit of the stockholders and that directors can consider the interests of other constituencies so long as doing so serves the ultimate goal of value maximization. | Under the TBOC, in discharging the duties of a director and in considering the best interests of the corporation, a director is entitled to consider the long-term and short-term interests of the corporation and the shareholders of the corporation, including the possibility that those interests may be best served by the continued independence of the corporation. In discharging the duties of a director or officer under the TBOC or otherwise, a director or officer of a corporation is entitled to consider any social purpose specified in the corporation’s certificate of formation. In addition, the TBOC provides that nothing in the applicable section thereof prohibits or limits a director or officer of a corporation that does not have a social purpose specified as a purpose in the corporation’s certificate of formation from | ||||
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Issue | Delaware | Texas | ||||
considering, approving, or taking an action that promotes or has the effect of promoting a social, charitable, or environmental purpose. Texas also has a public benefit corporation statute that is similar in many respects to the DGCL provisions for public benefit corporations. | ||||||
Business Opportunities | Under Delaware law, the corporate opportunity doctrine holds that a corporate officer or director may not generally and unilaterally take a business opportunity for his or her own. Factors to be considered include: (i) whether the corporation is financially able to exploit the opportunity; (ii) if the opportunity is within the corporation’s line of business; (iii) whether the corporation has an interest or expectancy in the opportunity; and (iv) whether by taking the opportunity for his or her own, the corporate fiduciary will thereby be placed in a position inimical to the officer’s or director’s duties to the corporation. The DGCL permits a Delaware corporation to renounce, in its certificate of incorporation or by action of the board of directors, any interest or expectancy of the corporation in, or in being offered an opportunity to participate in, specified business opportunities or specified classes or categories of business opportunities that are presented to the corporation or one or more of its officers, directors or stockholders. The Delaware Charter renounces any interest or expectancy of the Company in, or in being offered an opportunity to participate in, certain corporate opportunities. The Delaware Charter provides that, to the extent permitted by applicable law, the Principal Stockholders and their affiliates, and any member of the Board that is not also an officer of the Company have | Texas law is substantially similar to Delaware law with respect to the corporate opportunity doctrine. The TBOC permits a Texas entity to renounce, in its certificate of formation or by action of its board of directors, an interest or expectancy of the entity in, or an interest or expectancy of the entity in being offered an opportunity to participate in, specified business opportunities or a specified class or category of business opportunities presented to the entity or one or more of its directors, officers or owners. The Texas Charter renounces any interest or expectancy of the Company in, or in being offered an opportunity to participate in, certain corporate opportunities. The Texas Charter provides that, to the extent permitted by applicable law, the Principal Stockholders and their affiliates, and any member of the Board that is not also an officer of the Company have no duty to refrain from engaging in similar activities or lines of business as the Company, investing or owning any interest publicly or privately in, or developing a business relationship with, any business that is competitive or in the same line of business as the Company or entering any agreements to provide services to a business that is competitive or in the same line of business as the Company or acting as an officer, director, member, manager, advisor to, or principal of, such business. The Texas Charter additionally provides that if the | ||||
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Issue | Delaware | Texas | ||||
no duty to refrain from engaging in similar activities or lines of business as the Company, investing or owning any interest publicly or privately in, or developing a business relationship with, any business that is competitive or in the same line of business as the Company or entering any agreements to provide services to a business that is competitive or in the same line of business as the Company or acting as an officer, director, member, manager, advisor to, or principal of, such business. The Delaware Charter additionally provides that if the Principal Stockholders or their affiliates, or any member of the Board that is not also an officer of the Company, acquire knowledge of a potential transaction or business opportunity that could be a corporate opportunity, they have no duty to communicate or offer such corporate opportunity to the Company. | Principal Stockholders or their affiliates, or any member of the Board that is not also an officer of the Company, acquire knowledge of a potential transaction or business opportunity that could be a corporate opportunity, they have no duty to communicate or offer such corporate opportunity to the Company. | |||||
Indemnification of Directors and Officers | Under the DGCL, a Delaware corporation is permitted to indemnify any person who is a director, officer, employee, or agent of the corporation, or is or was serving at the request of the corporation as a director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise, against expenses (including attorneys’ fees), judgments, fines and amounts paid in settlement actually and reasonably incurred by the person in connection with any threatened, pending or completed action, suit or proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative (other than an action by or in the right of the corporation), to which such director, officer, employee or agent may be a party or threatened to be made a party, provided such person acted in good faith and in a manner the person reasonably believed was in or not opposed to the best interests of the corporation, and in the case of a criminal proceeding, that he or she had no reasonable cause to believe his | Under the TBOC, a Texas corporation is permitted to indemnify a director, former director, or delegate who was, is, or is threatened to be made a respondent in a proceeding, against judgments and against expenses (other than a judgment) reasonably and actually incurred by the person in connection with a proceeding if the person: (i) acted in good faith; (ii) reasonably believed, in the case of conduct in the person’s official capacity, that the person’s conduct was in the corporation’s best interests, and in any other case, that the person’s conduct was not opposed to the corporation’s best interests; and (iii) in the case of a criminal proceeding, did not have a reasonable cause to believe the person’s conduct was unlawful. If, however, the person is found liable to a Texas corporation, or is found liable on the basis that he or she received an improper personal benefit, then indemnification under the TBOC is limited to the reimbursement of | ||||
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Issue | Delaware | Texas | ||||
or her conduct was unlawful. In connection with any threatened, pending or completed action or suit by or in the right of the corporation involving a person who is or was a director, officer, employee or agent of the corporation, or is or was serving at the request of the corporation as a director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise, a Delaware corporation has the power to indemnify such a person who is a party or is threatened to be made a party for expenses (including attorneys’ fees) actually and reasonably incurred by such person in connection with the defense or settlement of such action or suit: (i) if such person acted in good faith and in a manner the person reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the corporation; and (ii) if such person is found liable to the corporation, only to the extent the Delaware Court of Chancery or the court in which such action or suit was brought determines upon application that in view of all the circumstances of the case, such person is fairly and reasonably entitled to indemnity for such expenses which the Court of Chancery or such other court shall deem proper. These rights are not exclusive of any other indemnification rights that may be granted by a Delaware corporation to its directors, officers, employees or agents. | reasonable expenses actually incurred in connection with the proceeding, and which excludes a judgment, a penalty, a fine, and an excise or similar tax, including an excise tax assessed against the person with respect to an employee benefit plan. Furthermore, no indemnification will be available if the person is found liable for: (i) willful or intentional misconduct in the performance of the person’s duty to the corporation; (ii) breach of the person’s duty of loyalty owed to the corporation; or (iii) an act or omission not committed in good faith that constitutes a breach of a duty owed by the person to the corporation. A corporation may indemnify and advance expenses to a person who is not a director, including an officer, employee or agent, as provided by: (a) the corporation’s governing documents; (b) general or specific action of the corporation’s board of directors; (c) resolution of the shareholders; (d) contract; or (e) common law. | |||||
Advancement of Expenses | Under the DGCL, expenses (including attorneys’ fees) incurred by an officer or director of the corporation in defending any civil, criminal, administrative or investigative action, suit or proceeding may be paid by the corporation in advance of the final disposition of such action, suit or proceeding upon receipt of an undertaking by or on behalf of such director or officer to repay such amount if it shall ultimately be determined that such person is not | Under the TBOC, a corporation may pay or reimburse reasonable expenses incurred by a present director or delegate who was, is, or is threatened to be made a respondent in a proceeding in advance of the final disposition of the proceeding without making the determinations required for permissive indemnification after the corporation receives: (i) a written affirmation by the person of the person’s good faith belief that the person has met the standard of conduct necessary for indemnification; and (ii) a written | ||||
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Issue | Delaware | Texas | ||||
entitled to be indemnified by the corporation as authorized in Section 145 of the DGCL. | undertaking by or on behalf of the person to repay the amount paid or reimbursed if the final determination is that the person has not met that standard or that indemnification is prohibited by the TBOC. | |||||
Procedure for Indemnification | Under the DGCL, a determination that indemnification of a director or officer is appropriate generally must be made: (i) by a majority vote of the directors who are not parties to the action, suit or proceeding, even though less than a quorum; (ii) by a committee of such directors designated by majority vote of such directors, even though less than a quorum; (iii) if there are no such directors or if such directors so direct, by independent legal counsel in a written opinion; or (iv) by the stockholders. | Under the TBOC, a determination that indemnification is appropriate generally must be made: (i) by a majority vote of the directors who, at the time of the vote, are disinterested and independent, regardless of whether such directors constitute a quorum; (ii) by a majority vote of a committee of the board of directors if the committee is designated by a majority vote of the directors who at the time of the vote are disinterested and independent, regardless of whether such directors constitute a quorum, and is composed solely of one or more directors who are disinterested and independent; (iii) by special legal counsel selected by majority vote under (i) or (ii) above; (iv) by the shareholders in a vote that excludes those shares held by directors who, at the time of the vote, are not disinterested and independent; or (v) by a unanimous vote of the shareholders of the corporation. | ||||
Mandatory Indemnification | The DGCL requires indemnification for expenses (including attorneys’ fees) actually and reasonably incurred with respect to any claim, issue or matter on which the director or “officer” (as defined for purposes of Section 145(c) of the DGCL) is successful on the merits or otherwise, in the defense of the proceeding. | The TBOC requires indemnification for reasonable expenses actually incurred only if the director is wholly successful, on the merits or otherwise, in the defense of the proceeding. | ||||
Selection of Forum/Venue | Under the DGCL, a Delaware corporation’s certificate of incorporation or bylaws may require, consistent with applicable jurisdictional requirements, that any or all internal corporate claims shall be brought solely and exclusively in any or all of the courts in Delaware, and no provision of a Delaware corporation’s certificate of incorporation or bylaws may prohibit bringing such claims in the courts of Delaware. | Under the TBOC, the governing documents of a Texas entity may require, consistent with applicable state and federal jurisdictional requirements, that any internal entity claims shall be brought only in a court in Texas. “Internal entity claim” means a claim of any nature, including a derivative claim in the right of an entity, that is based on, arises from, or relates to the internal affairs of the entity. Internal affairs | ||||
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Issue | Delaware | Texas | ||||
“Internal corporate claims” means claims, including claims in the right of the corporation, (i) that are based upon a violation of a duty by a current or former director or officer or stockholder in such capacity; or (ii) as to which the DGCL confers jurisdiction upon the Delaware Court of Chancery. The DGCL provides that, with respect to claims that are not internal corporate claims, the certificate of incorporation or bylaws may require stockholders, when acting in their capacity as stockholders or in the right of the corporation, to bring any or all such claims only in 1 or more prescribed forums or venues, if such claims relate to the business of the corporation, the conduct of its affairs, or the rights or powers of the corporation or its stockholders, directors or officers; provided that such requirement is consistent with applicable jurisdictional requirements and allows a stockholder to bring such claims in at least 1 court in Delaware that has jurisdiction over such claims. For more information on the exclusive forum provisions in the Delaware Charter, see “— Certain Differences Between the Delaware Charter and Bylaws and the Texas Charter and Bylaws — Exclusive Forum” above. | include the rights, powers, and duties of the entity’s governing persons, officers, owners, and members, and matters relating to the entity’s membership or ownership interests. The TBOC allows a corporation to identify a particular court in Texas as its sole venue, subject to jurisdictional limits. For more information on the exclusive forum provisions in the Texas Charter, see “— Certain Differences Between the Delaware Charter and Bylaws and the Texas Charter and Bylaws — Exclusive Forum” above. | |||||
Pre-Suit Demand in Derivative Suits | Under Delaware court rules and case law, in order for a stockholder to commence a derivative action on behalf of the corporation, the stockholder must (i) make a demand on the company’s board of directors or (ii) show that demand would be futile. Demand will be deemed futile if at least half the members of the board of directors in receipt of the demand (i) received a material personal benefit from the alleged misconduct that is the subject of the litigation demand, (ii) faces a substantial likelihood of liability on any of the claims that would be the subject of the litigation demand, or (iii) lacks independence from someone who received a material personal benefit from the alleged misconduct that would | Texas is a universal demand jurisdiction. A shareholder may not institute a derivative proceeding until the 91st day after the date on which a written demand is filed with the corporation stating with particularity the act, omission or other matter that is the subject of the claim or challenge and requesting that the corporation take suitable action. The foregoing waiting period is not required or, if applicable, will terminate if (i) the shareholder has been notified that the demand has been rejected by the corporation, (ii) the corporation is suffering irreparable injury, or (iii) irreparable injury to the corporation would result by waiting for the expiration | ||||
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Issue | Delaware | Texas | ||||
be the subject of the litigation demand or who would face a substantial likelihood of liability on any of the claims that are the subject of the litigation demand. If demand is excused, the board of directors of a Delaware corporation may form an independent special litigation committee to take control of the litigation. If demand is received and the board of directors or a board committee refuses to pursue litigation, the business judgment rule applies to the decision of the board of directors or board committee. | of the 90-day period. | |||||
Stock Ownership Requirement for Derivative Suits; Jury Trials | Under the DGCL, subject to limited exceptions, a stockholder may not institute or maintain a derivative suit unless the plaintiff was a stockholder of the corporation at the time of the transaction of which such stockholder complains or that such stockholder’s stock thereafter devolved upon such stockholder by operation of law, and the plaintiff maintains such ownership throughout the litigation. A limited number of Delaware corporations (not including the Delaware Corporation) may have included an ownership threshold for derivative claims in their bylaws, however, Delaware courts have not opined on the enforceability of these provisions. Jury trials are generally not available in the Delaware Court of Chancery, which is the venue in which stockholder suits relating to the internal affairs of a Delaware corporation are typically filed. | Under the TBOC, a shareholder may not institute or maintain a derivative proceeding unless: (i) the shareholder was a shareholder of the corporation at the time of the transaction in question, or became a shareholder by operation of law originating from a person that was a shareholder at the time of the transaction in question; and (ii) the shareholder fairly and adequately represents the interests of the corporation in enforcing the right of the corporation. The TBOC allows corporations with common shares listed on a national securities exchange and corporations with over 500 shareholders that have elected to be governed by Section 21.419 of the TBOC to set an ownership threshold in their governing documents (not to exceed 3% of outstanding shares) that shareholders must satisfy to bring a derivative claim. The TBOC allows a Texas corporation to include a waiver of jury trial in its certificate of formation or bylaws, and that such waiver will constitute a knowing waiver if enforced against a party approving the certificate of formation or bylaws or acquiring a security after the adoption of such certificate of formation or bylaws, continuing to hold a security of a public company after such certificate of formation or bylaws are adopted or by other methods permitted under law. For more information on the stock ownership requirement for derivative suits and jury trial waiver provisions in the | ||||
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Issue | Delaware | Texas | ||||
Texas Charter, see “— Certain Differences Between the Delaware Charter and Bylaws and the Texas Charter and Bylaws — Stock Ownership Requirement for Derivative Suits; Jury Trials” above. | ||||||
Dissent and Appraisal Rights | Under the DGCL, a stockholder or “beneficial owner” (as defined in Section 262 of the DGCL) of a corporation that is a constituent in a merger, consolidation, conversion, domestication, transfer, or continuance may, under certain circumstances, be entitled to appraisal rights pursuant to which the stockholder may receive cash in the amount of the fair market value of their shares as determined by a Delaware court. Under the DGCL, stockholders have no appraisal rights in the event of a merger, consolidation, conversion, domestication, transfer or continuance if (i) prior to the effective time of the transaction the stock of the corporation is listed on a national securities exchange or is held of record by more than 2,000 stockholders, and (ii) in the merger, consolidation, conversion, domestication, transfer or continuance, they receive solely shares of stock of the surviving corporation or entity or of any other corporation that at the effective date of the merger or consolidation will be either listed on a national securities exchange or held of record by more than 2,000 stockholders. | Under the TBOC, except for the limited classes of mergers, consolidations, sales and asset dispositions for which no shareholder approval is required under Texas law, shareholders of Texas corporations with voting rights have dissenters’ rights in the event of a merger, consolidation, interest exchange, conversion, sale, lease, exchange or other disposition of all, or substantially all, the property and assets of the corporation. However, a shareholder of a Texas corporation has no dissenters’ rights with respect to any plan of merger or conversion in which there is a single surviving or new domestic or foreign corporation, or with respect to any plan of exchange, if: (i) the ownership interest, or a depository receipt in respect of the ownership interest, held by the owner is part of a class or series of ownership interests, or depository receipts in respect of ownership interests, that are, on the record date set for purposes of determining which owners are entitled to vote on the plan of merger, conversion, or exchange, as appropriate: (a) listed on a national securities exchange, or (b) held of record by at least 2,000 owners, (ii) the owner is not required by the terms of the plan of merger, conversion, or exchange, as appropriate, to accept for the owner’s ownership interest any consideration that is different from the consideration to be provided to any other holder of an ownership interest of the same class or series as the ownership interest held by the owner, other than cash instead of fractional shares or interests the owner would otherwise be entitled to receive, and (iii) the owner is not required by the terms of the plan of merger, conversion, or exchange, as appropriate, to accept for the owner’s ownership interest any consideration other than: (a) ownership interests, or depository receipts in respect | ||||
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Issue | Delaware | Texas | ||||
of ownership interests, of another entity of the same general organizational type that, immediately after the effective date of the merger, conversion, or exchange, as appropriate, will be part of a class or series of ownership interests, or depository receipts in respect of ownership interests, that are: (i) listed on a national securities exchange or authorized for listing on the exchange on official notice of issuance, or (ii) held of record by at least 2,000 owners, (b) cash instead of fractional ownership interests the owner would otherwise be entitled to receive, or (c) any combination of the ownership interests and cash above. Under the TBOC, an owner of an ownership interest in a Texas domestic entity subject to dissenters’ rights is entitled to dissent from an amendment to a Texas for-profit corporation’s certificate of formation to add required provisions to elect to be a public benefit corporation or delete required provisions, which in effect cancels the corporation’s election to be a public benefit corporation if the owner owns shares that were entitled to vote on the amendment; except such owner may not dissent if the shares held by the owner are part of a class or series of shares listed on a national securities exchange or held of record by at least 2,000 owners. | ||||||
Independence of Corporate Statute | Delaware does not have an analogous statute. | The TBOC prohibits the plain meaning of the statutes under the TBOC from being supplanted, contravened, or modified by the laws or judicial decisions of any other jurisdiction. | ||||
Judicial Certification of Committees and Panels | Delaware does not have an analogous statute. | The TBOC permits corporations to request a court, at the start of a transaction or investigation of a derivative claim, to judicially determine the independence and disinterestedness of directors on committees reviewing transactions or individuals on panels reviewing derivative claims. Future challenges to independence or disinterestedness would require new facts. | ||||
TABLE OF CONTENTS
• | banks, insurance companies or other financial institutions; |
• | entities or arrangements treated as partnerships or other pass-through entities for U.S. federal income tax purposes or holders of interests therein; |
TABLE OF CONTENTS
• | tax-exempt or governmental organizations; |
• | dealers in securities or traders in securities that elect to use a mark-to-market method of accounting; |
• | persons that hold their Delaware Corporation Common Stock as part of a straddle, appreciated financial position, synthetic security, hedge, constructive sale, conversion transaction or other integrated investment or risk reduction transaction; |
• | persons that purchased or sell their Delaware Corporation Common Stock as part of a wash sale; |
• | certain former citizens or long-term residents of the United States or persons whose functional currency is not the U.S. dollar; |
• | persons that are not U.S. holders; |
• | persons who acquired or hold their Delaware Corporation Common Stock through the exercise of employee stock options, as a restricted stock award or otherwise as compensation or through a tax-qualified retirement plan; |
• | persons who actually or constructively hold (or actually or constructively held at any time during the five-year period ending on the date of the Texas Reincorporation) five percent or more (by vote or value) of any class of our common stock; or |
• | persons subject to special tax accounting rules (including rules requiring recognition of gross income based on a taxpayer’s applicable financial statement). |
• | an individual who is a citizen or resident of the United States; |
• | a corporation (or other entity treated as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes) created or organized in or under the laws of the United States, any state thereof or the District of Columbia; |
• | an estate the income of which is subject to U.S. federal income tax regardless of its source; or |
• | a trust (i) the administration of which is subject to the primary supervision of a U.S. court and which has one or more “United States persons” (within the meaning of Section 7701(a)(30) of the Code) who have the authority to control all substantial decisions of the trust or (ii) which has a valid election in effect under applicable U.S. Treasury regulations to be treated as a United States person. |
TABLE OF CONTENTS
• | a U.S. holder of Delaware Corporation Common Stock generally will not recognize gain or loss upon the conversion of Delaware Corporation Common Stock into Texas Corporation Common Stock pursuant to the Texas Reincorporation; |
• | the aggregate tax basis of the Texas Corporation Common Stock received by a U.S. holder of Delaware Corporation Common Stock pursuant to the Texas Reincorporation generally will equal the aggregate adjusted tax basis of such U.S. holder’s Delaware Corporation Common Stock converted into such Texas Corporation Common Stock; and |
• | the holding period of the Texas Corporation Common Stock received by a U.S. holder upon the conversion of Delaware Corporation Common Stock pursuant to the Texas Reincorporation generally will include the holding period of the Delaware Corporation Common Stock converted into such Texas Corporation Common Stock. |
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
• | each person or “group” (as such term is used in Section 13(d)(3) of the Exchange Act) known to Atlas who is a beneficial owner of more than 5% of outstanding shares of Delaware Corporation Common Stock; |
• | each of Atlas’s named executive officers and directors; and |
• | all executive officers and directors of Atlas as a group. |
Shares of Atlas Common Stock Beneficially Owned | ||||||
Number | Percentage(1) | |||||
Over 5% Stockholders | ||||||
BlackRock, Inc.(2) | 12,414,277 | [•]% | ||||
The Sealy & Smith Foundation(3) | 14,844,390 | [•]% | ||||
Gregory M. Shepard(4) | 7,421,210 | [•]% | ||||
Encompass Capital Advisors LLC(5) | 6,540,322 | [•]% | ||||
Directors and Named Executive Officers: | ||||||
Ben M. “Bud” Brigham(6) | 15,514,510 | [•]% | ||||
Blake McCarthy | 41,294 | * | ||||
John Turner(7) | 1,724,109 | [•]% | ||||
Dathan C. Voelter | 372,903 | * | ||||
Gayle Burleson | 23,184 | * | ||||
John Michael Howard | 22,953 | * | ||||
A. Lance Langford(8) | 1,263,744 | [•]% | ||||
Mark P. Mills | 31,009 | * | ||||
Douglas G. Rogers | 10,000 | * | ||||
Robb L. Voyles | 29,167 | * | ||||
Directors and Executive Officers as a group (10 persons) | 19,032,873 | [•]% | ||||
* | Less than 1%. |
(1) | Percentages based on [•] shares outstanding on the Record Date. |
(2) | BlackRock, Inc. has sole dispositive power over 12,414,277 shares of Common Stock and sole voting power over 12,290,494 shares of our Common Stock. The principal address of BlackRock, Inc. is 50 Hudson Yards, New York, NY 10001. The foregoing information is based on the Schedule 13G/A filed by BlackRock, Inc. on October 2, 2025. |
(3) | These shares are held directly by The Sealy & Smith Foundation. Douglas G. Rogers is the Executive Director and Secretary/Treasurer of The Sealy & Smith Foundation. The board of directors of The Sealy & Smith Foundation consists of seven members: Douglas G. Rogers, Keith Bassett, Jere Pederson, Jim Galbraith, John Kelso, Bill Sealy and Michael Doherty. Accordingly, the officers and members of the board of directors of The Sealy & Smith Foundation may be deemed to have or share beneficial ownership of the shares held by The Sealy & Smith Foundation. The mailing address of The Sealy & Smith Foundation is 2200 Market Street, Suite 500, Galveston, Texas 77550. |
(4) | Includes shares of Common Stock held directly by Gregory M. Shepard. The foregoing information is based on the Form 4 filed by Mr. Shepard on February 19, 2026. The mailing address of Mr. Shepard is 15405 Anchorage Place, Lakewood Ranch, FL 34202. |
(5) | Encompass Capital Advisors LLC and Todd J. Kantor have shared dispositive power and shared voting power over 6,540,322 shares of our |
TABLE OF CONTENTS
(6) | Includes (i) 13,359,229 shares of Common Stock held directly by Anne and Bud Oil & Gas Vested LLC (“Anne and Bud Vested”), (ii) 1,564,346 shares of Common Stock held directly by Brigham Children’s Family LP (“Brigham Children’s LP”) and (iii) 54,388 shares held by Mr. Brigham’s spouse as separate property. Mr. Brigham is the manager of Anne and Bud Vested and the co-manager of BCFP GP, LLC, which is the general partner of Brigham Children’s LP. Therefore, Mr. Brigham may be deemed to share the right to direct the voting or investment of the shares directly held by Anne and Bud Vested and Brigham Children’s LP. All of the shares of Common Stock held directly by Anne and Bud Vested are pledged as security. Additionally, Mr. Brigham may be deemed to have shared voting power over all securities held by the Principal Stockholders party to the A&R Stockholders’ Agreement, in light of his right to designate nominees for election to the Board and the obligation of the Principal Stockholders to vote their respective shares in favor of Mr. Brigham’s nominees. Because Mr. Brigham may be deemed to have shared voting power with respect to the shares held by the Principal Stockholders, he may be deemed to be the beneficial owner of such shares. Mr. Brigham disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares held by Anne and Bud Vested, Brigham Children’s LP, his spouse and the Principal Stockholders and each of their respective affiliated entities, except to the extent of his pecuniary interest therein, if any. |
(7) | Includes 1,327,980 shares of Common Stock held directly by 3 Dog Interests, LP. Mr. Turner is the sole manager of 3 Dog Interests GP, LLC, the general partner of 3 Dog Interests, LP. All of the shares of Common Stock held directly by 3 Dog Interests, LP are pledged as security. |
(8) | Includes (i) 484,483 shares of Common Stock held directly by ALL Financial Trust and (ii) 592,146 shares of Common Stock held directly by BLL Financial Trust. Mr. Langford is the spouse of the trustee of ALL Financial Trust and the trustee of BLL Financial Trust. Mr. Langford disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares held by ALL Financial Trust and BLL Financial Trust except to the extent of his pecuniary interest therein. Shares of Common Stock held directly by ALL Financial Trust and BLL Financial Trust are pledged as security. |
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Ben M. Brigham | |||
Gayle Burleson | |||
John Michael Howard | |||
A. Lance Langford | |||
Mark P. Mills | |||
Douglas Rogers | |||
John Turner | |||
Robb L. Voyles | |||
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. | Plan of Conversion. |
a. | The name of the Converting Entity is “Atlas Energy Solutions Inc.”, a Delaware corporation. |
b. | The name of the Converted Entity is “Atlas Energy Solutions Inc.”, a Texas corporation. |
c. | The Converting Entity is continuing its existence, without lapse or interruption, in the organizational form of a Texas for-profit corporation under the name “Atlas Energy Solutions Inc.” |
d. | The Converted Entity is to be a corporation and its jurisdiction of formation is the State of Texas. |
e. | As of the Effective Time, automatically by virtue of the Conversion and without any further action on the part of any person, each share of Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share, of the Converting Entity issued and outstanding or held in treasury immediately prior to the Effective Time shall be automatically converted into one share of Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share, of the Converted Entity. At and after the Effective Time: (i) all of the outstanding certificates that immediately prior thereto represented issued and outstanding shares of Common Stock of the Converting Entity shall be deemed for all purposes to evidence ownership of and to represent shares of Common Stock of the Converted Entity into which the shares represented by such certificates have been converted as herein provided and shall be so registered on the books and records of the Converted Entity and its transfer agent; and (ii) all of the issued and outstanding shares of Common Stock of the Converting Entity that are in uncertificated book-entry form shall automatically become the number and class of shares of the Converted Entity into which such shares of the Converting Entity have been converted as herein provided in accordance with the customary procedures of the Converting Entity’s transfer agent. |
f. | As of the Effective Time, automatically by virtue of the Conversion and without any further action on the part of any person, each employment letter or agreement, employee benefit plan or agreement, incentive compensation plan or agreement or other similar plan or agreement to which the Converting Entity is a party, or otherwise maintains, sponsors or contributes, shall continue to be a plan or agreement of the Converted Entity on the same terms and conditions and any references to the Converting Entity thereunder shall mean the Converted Entity on and after the Effective Time. To the extent that any such plan, letter or agreement provides for the issuance, or is otherwise based on the value, of common stock or other equity security of the Converting Entity, as of the Effective Time, automatically by virtue of the Conversion and without any further action on the part of any person, such plan or agreement shall be deemed to provide for the issuance, or be based on the value, of common stock or other equity security of the Converted Entity, respectively. |
g. | As of the Effective Time, automatically by virtue of the Conversion and without any further action on the part of any person, each agreement to which the Converting Entity is a party shall continue to be an agreement of the Converted Entity on the same terms and conditions and any references to the Converting Entity thereunder shall, on and after the Effective Time, mean the Converted Entity. |
TABLE OF CONTENTS
h. | The Conversion shall not (i) extinguish the standing of any person or entity who is a plaintiff in any derivative action or suit brought on behalf of the Converting Entity (including any appeal therefrom) that is pending at the Effective Time or (ii) extinguish or adversely affect the standing or ability of any person or entity to initiate a derivative action or suit on behalf of the Converting Entity regarding acts, omissions or transactions occurring prior to the Effective Time if such person or entity was a stockholder or beneficial owner of the Converting Entity at the time of such act, omission or transaction; provided that, in each case, such person or entity shall maintain his, her or its status as a stockholder or beneficial owner of the Converted Entity through the pendency of any such derivative action or suit (any such person or entity, a “Plaintiff,” and any such derivative action or suit, a “Derivative Action”). Following the Effective Time, the Converted Entity shall not assert that the Conversion, or the application of the laws of the State of Texas to the Converted Entity, extinguished or adversely affected the standing or ability (as applicable) of any Plaintiff to initiate or maintain any Derivative Action. |
2. | Effective Time. The Conversion will be consummated under the TBOC by filing with the Secretary of State of the State of Texas (a) a Certificate of Conversion in the form required by the TBOC (the “Texas Certificate”) and executed in accordance with the relevant provisions of the TBOC and (b) a Certificate of Formation in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A (the “Certificate of Formation”). The “Effective Time” shall be such time as the Texas Certificate is accepted and filed by the Secretary of State of the State of Texas. Simultaneously with the filing of the Texas Certificate, the Converting Entity is authorized and empowered to take any such actions as may be necessary or prudent in connection with the Conversion under the DGCL, including the filing of a Certificate of Conversion with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware. |
3. | Effects of the Conversion. The Conversion will have the effects set forth in the TBOC and, to the extent necessary, the DGCL, including without limitation the effects set forth in Section 1(c) of this Plan. The Converted Entity will be responsible for the payment of all of the Converting Entity’s fees and franchise taxes and will be responsible for all of its debts and liabilities. |
4. | Governance of the Converted Entity. On and after the Effective Time, the affairs of the Converted Entity shall be governed in accordance with the TBOC and the Certificate of Formation, and the Bylaws of the Converted Entity in substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit B. Immediately after the Effective Time, the directors and officers of the Converting Entity shall continue as the directors and officers of the Converted Entity. |
5. | Plan of Reorganization. It is intended that the Conversion qualify as a “reorganization” within the meaning of Section 368(a)(1)(F) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”) (and any similar provision of state or local law). This Plan shall constitute, and is adopted as, a “plan of reorganization” within the meaning of Sections 1.368-2(g) and 1.368-3(a) of the U.S. Treasury Regulations promulgated under the Code. |
6. | Foreign Qualifications of the Converted Entity. For the purpose of authorizing the Converted Entity to do business in any state, territory or dependency of the United States, including, but not limited to, Delaware, or in any foreign country in which it is necessary or expedient for the Converted Entity to transact business, the officers of the Converted Entity are hereby authorized and empowered to appoint and substitute all necessary agents or attorneys for service of process, to designate and to prepare, execute, and file, for and on behalf of the Converted Entity, all necessary certificates, reports, powers of attorney, and other instruments as may be required by the laws of such state, territory, dependency or foreign country to authorize the Converted Entity to transact business therein, and whenever it is expedient for the Converted Entity to cease doing business therein and withdraw therefrom, to revoke any appointment of agent or attorney for service of process, and to file such certificates, reports, revocation of appointment or surrender of authority as may be necessary to terminate the authority of the Converted Entity to do business in any such state, territory, dependency or foreign country, and all actions taken by the officers of the Converted Entity prior to the Effective Time in furtherance of this Section 6 shall be, and each of them hereby is, approved, ratified and confirmed in all respects as the proper acts and deeds of the Converted Entity. |
7. | Third Party Beneficiaries. This Plan shall not confer any rights or remedies upon any person or entity other than as expressly provided herein, it being understood that, notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this |
TABLE OF CONTENTS
8. | Severability. Whenever possible, each term and provision of this Plan will be interpreted in such manner as to be effective and valid under applicable law, but if any term or provision of this Plan is held to be prohibited by or invalid under applicable law or in any jurisdiction, such term or provision will be ineffective only to the extent of such prohibition or invalidity, without invalidating the remainder of this Plan. Upon the determination that any term or provision of this Plan is invalid, illegal or unenforceable, such term or provision shall be deemed amended in such jurisdiction, without further action on the part of any person or entity, to the limited extent necessary to render the same valid, legal and enforceable. |
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Atlas Energy Solutions Inc. a Delaware corporation | |||||||||
By: | |||||||||
Name: | John Turner | ||||||||
Title: | President and Chief Executive Officer | ||||||||
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Name | Address | |||||
1. | Ben M. Brigham | 5918 W. Courtyard Drive, Suite 500, Austin, Texas 78730 | ||||
2. | Gayle Burleson | 5918 W. Courtyard Drive, Suite 500, Austin, Texas 78730 | ||||
3. | Mike Howard | 5918 W. Courtyard Drive, Suite 500, Austin, Texas 78730 | ||||
4. | A. Lance Langford | 5918 W. Courtyard Drive, Suite 500, Austin, Texas 78730 | ||||
5. | Mark P. Mills | 5918 W. Courtyard Drive, Suite 500, Austin, Texas 78730 | ||||
6. | Douglas Rogers | 5918 W. Courtyard Drive, Suite 500, Austin, Texas 78730 | ||||
7. | Robb L. Voyles | 5918 W. Courtyard Drive, Suite 500, Austin, Texas 78730 | ||||
8. | John Turner | 5918 W. Courtyard Drive, Suite 500, Austin, Texas 78730 | ||||
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ATLAS ENERGY SOLUTIONS INC. | ||||||
By: | ||||||
Name: | ||||||
Title: | ||||||
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS

TABLE OF CONTENTS
