Mina Rezk Updates AEVA Ownership; Gifts 1M Shares, Notes Collateral Sale
Rhea-AI Filing Summary
Amendment No. 2 to Schedule 13D updates insider ownership of Aeva Technologies, Inc. (AEVAW) by co-founder & CTO Mina Rezk as of 31 Jul 2025.
- Beneficial ownership: 5,040,888 common shares, or 8.7 % of the outstanding class.
- Composition: 180,667 shares held directly, 3,486,669 shares held via a trust, and 1,373,552 option shares exercisable within 60 days. An additional 1,394,605 RSUs are excluded because they will not settle within 60 days.
Recent transactions (past 60 days)
- 07 Jul 2025 – 69,901 shares sold at $30.54 (≈ $2.13 m) to cover withholding taxes on RSU vesting.
- 31 Jul 2025 – 1,000,000 shares gifted to two unaffiliated individuals for no consideration.
Ownership decline driver: 3.56 m shares previously pledged by affiliate EAD Group LLC to secure a loan are now subject to dispute and may have been sold before Jun 2025, reducing Rezk’s reportable stake.
Rezk retains sole voting and dispositive power over the reported shares and confirms no criminal or civil proceedings. No additional change in purpose or corporate strategy is disclosed.
Positive
- None.
Negative
- None.
Insights
TL;DR: Insider stake drops to 8.7%; pledged-share dispute clouds float outlook but CTO still holds a meaningful position.
The filing shows Rezk’s stake fell materially from prior reports, driven by the contested disposition of 3.56 m pledged shares plus a 1 m-share gift and a relatively small tax-related sale. While 8.7 % remains a sizeable alignment signal, the downward trend and uncertainty over pledged shares introduce potential share-supply risk that could pressure sentiment. No purchase activity is noted, suggesting neutral-to-slightly-negative optics for investors.
TL;DR: Transparent disclosure is positive, but collateral dispute highlights governance and financing risks.
Rezk clearly details the structure of his holdings and recent transactions, satisfying disclosure standards. However, the pledge-related dispute indicates reliance on personal leverage structures that can unintentionally release significant equity into the market without advance notice. From a governance perspective, boards often discourage pledging to avoid such forced sales; investors may question risk controls around insider collateral arrangements.