ANAB: Morgan Stanley Files 13G for 1.85M Shares, 6.3% Ownership
Rhea-AI Filing Summary
Morgan Stanley and its subsidiary Morgan Stanley Capital Services LLC filed a Schedule 13G on 08/05/2025 disclosing a combined passive stake of 1,845,002 ANAB shares (6.3 % of outstanding) as of 06/30/2025. The parent company reports shared voting power over 1,841,919 shares and shared dispositive power over 1,845,002 shares; it holds no sole voting or dispositive authority.
The subsidiary individually owns 1,525,502 shares (5.2 %) with fully shared voting and dispositive power. The filing is made under Rule 13d-1(b), classifying Morgan Stanley as a parent holding company/control person (HC, CO) and the subsidiary as a broker-dealer (BD, CO). Both certify the shares were acquired in the ordinary course of business and not for the purpose of influencing control of AnaptysBio.
Positive
- Morgan Stanley now holds 6.3 % of ANAB’s outstanding shares, introducing a prominent institutional investor and potential liquidity support.
- Filing is passive (Rule 13d-1(b)), indicating no immediate risk of activist pressure while still signalling confidence in the company.
Negative
- None.
Insights
TL;DR – Morgan Stanley reveals 6.3 % passive stake, adding a high-profile institutional holder to ANAB’s register.
Morgan Stanley’s aggregate ownership crosses the 5 % threshold, triggering this 13G. A globally recognised financial institution taking a >6 % position can boost market confidence, increase trading liquidity and widen sell-side coverage for AnaptysBio. Because the filing is passive (13G, not 13D), no immediate strategic activism is implied. Still, passive stakes by sophisticated investors are often viewed positively by the market, especially for mid-cap biotechs that rely on external capital. The reported holding date (30 Jun 2025) precedes the filing by just over a month, so the data are relatively current. Impact: modestly positive.
TL;DR – No control intent signalled; governance impact minimal.
The 13G certification states the shares were not bought to influence control, and Morgan Stanley claims only shared voting/dispositive power. Hence, no governance contest or board nomination pressure is expected. From a compliance standpoint, both entities correctly identify their legal classifications and provide required joint-filing exhibits. Investors should monitor future amendments: a switch to Schedule 13D or an increase above 10 % would materially change the governance outlook. Present impact: neutral-to-positive because of enhanced institutional oversight without activism.