Here are the 10-Q quarterly reports from Ankam (ANKM) in our archive since June 2025, newest first, and each one links through to the document itself with the summary and the scores our analysis gives it.
A 10-Q covers the quarterly report filed between annual reports, so if you follow ANKM and want that one kind of document rather than the whole filing history, this is the page to keep. The company's other filings, of every form, are on the full ANKM filings page.
Ankam, Inc. (ANKM) reported revenue of $44,900 for the nine months ended August 31, 2026, compared with $240,000 for the nine months ended August 31, 2025, and a net loss of $369,356 versus $15,445. Management attributed the revenue decrease to a slowdown or contraction in operating activities. For the three months ended August 31, 2026, revenue was $0 and net loss was $112,764, compared with $0 revenue and a $60,551 net loss for the same period in 2025.
Nine-month operating expenses were $414,344, compared with $147,584. ANKAM used $237,677 of cash in operating activities and had $8,321 in cash as of August 31, 2026. Total liabilities were $783,538, including $561,706 owed to its sole director, Wang Wen Lung; the advances are unsecured, non-interest bearing and due on demand.
Management described limited working capital and said it expects to depend on additional investment capital in the near future. It said there are no assurances the company will become financially viable and continue as a going concern. Management also concluded that disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of August 31, 2026.
Ankam, Inc. reported a sharp deterioration for the quarter and six months ended May 31, 2026. Six‑month revenue fell to $44,900 from $240,000 a year earlier, while total operating expenses rose to $301,577, driving a net loss of $256,592 versus prior‑year net profit of $45,106.
At May 31, 2026, the company had cash of $6,330 and total assets of $31,880 against total liabilities of $679,733, including $489,380 due to its director, resulting in stockholders’ deficit of $647,853. Management states that recurring losses, negative working capital and dependence on financing raise substantial doubt about continuing as a going concern and plans to seek additional equity capital and higher revenues.
Most expenses and losses came from Hong Kong subsidiary Mei Sheng, while capitalized software for the Apex service represents most assets. Disclosure controls and procedures were concluded to be not effective, although no material legal proceedings or off‑balance sheet arrangements are reported.
Ankam, Inc. reported a net loss of $203,118 for the three months ended February 28, 2026, with no revenue, compared with revenue of $75,000 and a net loss of $10,581 a year earlier. Operating expenses rose sharply to $203,220, driven mainly by $150,000 of professional fees and server and amortization costs.
Cash fell to $1,794 against total liabilities of $634,844, including $475,970 due to the sole director, resulting in a stockholders’ deficit of $594,379 and an accumulated deficit of $768,009. Management highlights substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern without additional capital.
ANKAM, Inc. (ANKM) filed its quarterly report for the period ended August 31, 2025. The company reported no revenue in the quarter and a net loss of $60,551, reflecting cost of services without sales and ongoing operating expenses. Year to date, ANKAM generated revenue of $240,000 with a net loss of $15,445, a narrower loss versus the prior year.
Liquidity remains tight: cash was $23,767 at August 31, 2025. Total liabilities were $620,186, including a related‑party loan of $449,338 and amounts due to a director of $50,932. Stockholders’ deficit was $(339,554). The company disclosed a going concern uncertainty and said it may rely on additional investment capital.
Operationally, expenses decreased year over year due to lower director fees and server costs, and amortization remained steady. Shares outstanding were 4,558,063 as of August 31, 2025. Management concluded disclosure controls and procedures were not effective; no material legal proceedings were reported.