Farallon funds disclose passive 4.9% stake in Aramark (ARMK)
Rhea-AI Filing Summary
Farallon-affiliated funds and related entities report passive ownership stakes in Aramark common stock under Rule 13d-1(c). Combined holdings reported by the Farallon Individual Reporting Persons total 12,899,701 shares (4.9% of the class), with Farallon Partners, L.L.C. shown with 12,647,640 shares (4.8%) and Farallon Equity Partners Master, L.P. holding 9,070,923 shares (3.5%). Other Farallon funds report smaller stakes ranging from 168,227 to 1,590,986 shares.
The filing states the shares are held directly by the funds and are reported as passive; the reporting persons certify the securities were not acquired to change or influence control. The filing also notes the reporting persons neither disclaim nor affirm the existence of a group, and that certain individuals may be deemed beneficial owners while disclaimers of beneficial ownership are included.
Positive
- Transparent fund-level disclosure with specific share counts and percentages for multiple Farallon entities, enabling clear assessment of positions.
- Certification of passive intent included: reporting persons state the securities were not acquired to change or influence control.
Negative
- Group status ambiguity: the reporting persons state they "neither disclaim nor affirm the existence of a group," leaving potential collective intent unclear.
- Multiple related entities and managers listed while disclaiming beneficial ownership, which may complicate interpretation of who ultimately directs voting or disposition.
Insights
TL;DR: Farallon reports a passive, sub-5% aggregate stake of 12.9M ARMK shares, implying limited formal control influence.
The filing provides clear, fund-level disclosure of holdings across multiple Farallon entities, with the largest reported aggregates at 12,899,701 shares (4.9%) for the Farallon Individual Reporting Persons and 12,647,640 shares (4.8%) for Farallon Partners, L.L.C. The statement is filed under Rule 13d-1(c) and includes a certification that the shares were not acquired to change or influence control, which is material for investors assessing potential activist intent.
TL;DR: Detailed ownership is disclosed, but the filing's position on grouping leaves collective voting dynamics ambiguous.
The schedule identifies multiple affiliated funds, general partners and named individuals with investment discretion. It explicitly states the reporting persons "neither disclaim nor affirm the existence of a group," while also noting certain individuals may be deemed beneficial owners yet disclaiming beneficial ownership. That duality is factual in the filing and may leave readers without a definitive statement on whether these holdings should be treated as coordinated for governance analysis.