State Street Reports Shared Voting Power of 5.95M in Arrowhead (ARWR)
Rhea-AI Filing Summary
State Street Corporation filed a Schedule 13G reporting beneficial ownership of 6,371,056 shares of Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals Inc. common stock, representing 4.6% of the class as of the event date 06/30/2025. The filing is signed on behalf of State Street by Elizabeth Schaefer, Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer, on 08/08/2025.
The statement shows no sole voting or dispositive power (0 shares) and records shared voting power of 5,952,902 shares and shared dispositive power of 6,371,056 shares. Item 7 identifies State Street advisory and funds entities as affiliated managers (for example, SSGA Funds Management, Inc.; State Street Global Advisors Europe Limited). The filing does not indicate a group filing or identify any other person with >5% ownership.
Positive
- None.
Negative
- None.
Insights
TL;DR: Passive institutional disclosure showing a meaningful but non-controlling stake; below 5% threshold for mandatory activist reporting.
State Street reports beneficial ownership of 6,371,056 shares, equal to 4.6% of Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals. The position is held with shared voting power of 5,952,902 and shared dispositive power of 6,371,056, while sole powers are zero. Because the stake is under 5%, it is typically treated as passive institutional ownership rather than an activist or control-seeking position. The identification of multiple State Street advisory affiliates in Item 7 is consistent with custody and advisory structures for institutional asset managers.
TL;DR: Disclosure clarifies stewardship roles across State Street affiliates but shows no direct control or sole decision-making authority.
The filing discloses shared authority across State Street entities, listing specific affiliates in Item 7 (e.g., SSGA Funds Management, Inc.; State Street Global Advisors Europe Limited). Shared voting and dispositive powers indicate coordinated handling of assets by advisory arms rather than unilateral control. The result is transparency about who votes and disposes of shares, but the reported percentages and power breakdown do not signal governance change or takeover intent.