CLIR Board Resignations Trigger Nasdaq Notice; Company Seeks New Independent Director
Rhea-AI Filing Summary
ClearSign Technologies disclosed that Nasdaq notified the company it is not in compliance with board independence and audit committee composition rules following the resignations of Catharine M. de Lacy and Judith S. Schrecker, which became effective August 4, 2025. At the time of the notice the Board lacked a majority of independent directors and the Audit and Risk Committee had only two independent members instead of the required three. The Board reduced its size from six to five, appointed Louis J. Basenese to the Governance Committee and G. Todd Silva to the Compensation Committee, and does not currently intend to appoint a lead independent director. The company intends to appoint an independent director who meets Nasdaq and Rule 10A-3 requirements to regain compliance. Nasdaq granted a cure period until the earlier of the next annual meeting or August 4, 2026 (with an alternative February 2, 2026 deadline if the annual meeting occurs earlier). The Notice does not affect the immediate listing of the company’s common stock, and a press release is furnished as Exhibit 99.1.
Positive
- Nasdaq granted a cure period allowing time to regain compliance without immediate delisting
- Company intends to appoint a new independent director who meets Nasdaq and Rule 10A-3(b)(1) requirements
- Board took immediate actions by reassigning committee roles and documenting the changes
- Listing remains active as the Notice has no immediate effect on the company’s Nasdaq listing
Negative
- Noncompliance with Nasdaq independence rules due to resignations of two independent directors
- Audit Committee below required size—only two independent members versus the required three
- Board reduced from six to five directors, which may limit immediate governance capacity
- No current lead independent director and no appointed replacement lead indicated
Insights
TL;DR: Two independent director resignations created a Nasdaq compliance gap; the company has a defined cure period and a clear remediation path.
The immediate issue is procedural: resignations of two independent directors left the Board without a majority of independent directors and reduced the Audit Committee to two independent members, below Nasdaq's three-member requirement. The Board acted to reassign committee roles but has not yet filled the substantive independence gap. The company has publicly stated its intent to appoint a qualified independent director and Nasdaq has provided a formal cure period, which reduces near-term listing risk. For governance stakeholders, the key material facts are the identities of the departing directors, the current committee appointments, and the specific cure deadlines defined by Nasdaq.
TL;DR: This is a material compliance notice but not an immediate listing threat because Nasdaq granted a cure period and the company plans remediation.
The filing documents a Nasdaq Listing Qualifications notice citing noncompliance with Rule 5605(b)(1) and 5605(c)(2)(A) due to the resignations. The company disclosed concrete remedial steps: reduction of board size from six to five, committee reassignments, and an intention to appoint an independent director who meets Nasdaq and Rule 10A-3(b)(1) standards. Nasdaq’s cure period—until the earlier of the next annual meeting or August 4, 2026, with an alternative February 2, 2026 deadline—provides a regulatory timeline for correction. Investors should view this as a governance-level compliance event that is remediable within the prescribed timeframe; the filing confirms the listing is unaffected for now.