Ellomay Capital (ELLO) details Edelcom’s dismissal of Dorad 2 claim

Rhea-AI Filing Summary

Ellomay Capital Ltd. reports a development in the legal proceedings related to the planned expansion of the Dorad power plant, known as the Dorad 2 project. Edelcom Ltd., which owns 18.75% of Dorad Energy Ltd., had filed a claim in the Tel Aviv District Court in September 2024 against Dorad and its other shareholders, including Ellomay Luzon Energy Infrastructures Ltd., a private company 50% owned by Ellomay Capital that holds 33.75% of Dorad.

The claim sought court declarations that any decision to advance or manage construction of a new power plant or expansion of the existing one, including Dorad 2, would require unanimous approval by Dorad’s shareholders or directors, and requested a permanent injunction blocking actions related to such expansion without unanimous shareholder consent. On December 15, 2025, Edelcom asked the court to dismiss the claim following a preliminary hearing held on November 11, 2025, while expressly reserving all its claims and rights, including the option to file a new claim based on the same facts.

Insights

Securities litigation and risk analyst

Edelcom has requested dismissal of its Dorad 2 claim but kept the option to sue again.

Ellomay Capital explains that Edelcom, an 18.75% shareholder in Dorad Energy, had asked an Israeli court to require unanimous shareholder or board approval for any decision to advance the Dorad 2 power plant expansion, and to bar Dorad and its other shareholders from taking related steps without such unanimous consent. This targeted governance around the project rather than seeking monetary damages in the passage provided.

On December 15, 2025, after an earlier preliminary hearing on November 11, 2025, Edelcom requested dismissal of its claim. However, it expressly reserved all claims and rights, including the right to file a new claim based on the same facts, so the underlying disagreement over Dorad 2 has not been definitively resolved.

For now, the immediate court proceeding appears to halt, which may ease near-term procedural constraints around Dorad 2, but the possibility of renewed litigation remains. Ellomay directs readers to its Form 20-F and a prior Form 6-K for fuller background, indicating that future disclosures in those channels will be important for tracking any new legal steps connected to this project.

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 6-K

Report of Foreign Private Issuer
Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 OR 15d-16
UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the month of December 2025

Commission File Number: 001-35284

Ellomay Capital Ltd.

(Translation of registrant’s name into English)

18 Rothschild Blvd., Tel Aviv 6688121, Israel

(Address of principal executive office)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under cover of Form 20-F or Form 40-F.

Form 20-F ☒          Form 40-F ☐

THIS FORM 6-K IS HEREBY INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE INTO THE REGISTRANT’S REGISTRATION STATEMENTS ON FORM F-3 (NOS. 333-199696 AND 333-144171) AND FORM S-8 (NOS. 333-187533, 333-102288 AND 333-92491), AND TO BE A PART THEREOF FROM THE DATE ON WHICH THIS REPORT IS SUBMITTED, TO THE EXTENT NOT SUPERSEDED BY DOCUMENTS OR REPORTS SUBSEQUENTLY FILED OR FURNISHED.

Update regarding Legal Proceeding in connection with the Dorad 2 Project

Ellomay Capital Ltd. (the “Company”), hereby provides an update in connection with the claim filed with the Israeli District Court of Tel Aviv by Edelcom Ltd. (“Edelcom”), which holds 18.75% of the shares of Dorad Energy Ltd. (“Dorad”), against Dorad and its other shareholders, including Ellomay Luzon Energy Infrastructures Ltd. (a private company that is 50% owned by the Company and holds 33.75% of the shares of Dorad), in September 2024 (the “Claim”).

The Claim included a petition for several declaratory judgements in connection with the potential expansion of the Dorad power plant (“Dorad 2”), including that any resolution of the shareholders or the board of directors of Dorad to advance and manage the construction of a new power plant or the expansion of the existing power plant, including the “Dorad 2” project, will be approved only if all of the shareholders or all of the directors, as the case may be, voted in favor of the resolution. In addition, Edelcom requested in the Claim that the court issue a permanent injunction instructing Dorad and its other shareholders, including anyone on their behalf, not to do any action that relates to a change in Dorad’s field of operation, including planning and construction of a new power plant or the expansion of the existing power plant, including in connection with “Dorad 2” and approving budgets for these actions and/or performing any tests in connection therewith, unless these actions were unanimously approved by the shareholders of Dorad.

On December 15, 2025, Edelcom submitted a notice and request to the court, requesting the dismissal of the Claim following a preliminary hearing held on November 11, 2025, while reserving all of its claims and rights, including the right to file a new claim based on the same facts underlying the Claim.

For more information about the Claim see the Company’s Annual Report on Form 20-F submitted to the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on April 30, 2025 and the Form 6-K submitted by the Company to the SEC on December 1, 2025.

1

Signatures

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

	Ellomay Capital Ltd.
	By:	/s/ Ran Fridrich
		Ran Fridrich
		Chief Executive Officer and Director

Dated: December 16, 2025

2

FAQ

What legal update did Ellomay Capital (ELLO) provide regarding the Dorad 2 project?

Ellomay Capital reported that Edelcom Ltd., which had filed a claim in the Tel Aviv District Court concerning the expansion of the Dorad power plant (the Dorad 2 project), submitted a request on December 15, 2025 to dismiss that claim, following a preliminary hearing held on November 11, 2025.

What was Edelcom originally asking the court to decide in its claim related to Dorad 2?

Edelcom’s claim sought several declaratory judgements that any decision by Dorad’s shareholders or board to advance or manage construction of a new power plant, or expand the existing Dorad plant (including Dorad 2), would require unanimous approval. It also requested a permanent injunction preventing Dorad and its other shareholders from taking actions related to changing Dorad’s field of operation or expanding the plant, including approving budgets or tests, unless unanimously approved by shareholders.

How is Ellomay Capital connected to Dorad Energy Ltd. in this proceeding?

The claim was filed against Dorad Energy Ltd. and its other shareholders, including Ellomay Luzon Energy Infrastructures Ltd., a private company that is 50% owned by Ellomay Capital Ltd. and holds 33.75% of Dorad’s shares. Ellomay Capital’s exposure arises through this shareholding structure.

Does Edelcom’s dismissal of the claim permanently end the Dorad 2 dispute?

No. While Edelcom requested dismissal of the claim, it did so while reserving all of its claims and rights, including the right to file a new claim based on the same facts. This means the specific proceeding described is being withdrawn, but the underlying legal positions may be brought back before the court in a new filing.

Where can investors find more background on the Dorad 2 legal matter involving Ellomay Capital?

Ellomay Capital refers readers to its Annual Report on Form 20-F submitted to the SEC on April 30, 2025 and a Form 6-K submitted on December 1, 2025 for additional information about the claim and the Dorad 2 project.