EQ Form 4: 1.695M Options to CEO Bruce D. Steel, Vesting Over Four Years
Rhea-AI Filing Summary
Bruce D. Steel, who is identified as President and CEO, Director and a 10% owner of Equillium, Inc. (EQ), reported a grant of an employee stock option on 08/29/2025. The option covers 1,695,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $1.74 per share and is exercisable through 08/28/2035. The report was signed on 09/02/2025.
The option vests with 25% vesting on the first anniversary of the vesting commencement date and the remainder vesting in 36 equal monthly installments over the following three years. The filing indicates direct beneficial ownership of the underlying shares following the grant.
Positive
- Alignment of interests: Multi-year vesting ties the CEO's compensation to long-term share performance.
- Retention incentive: The vesting schedule with monthly installments supports executive retention over four years.
Negative
- Potential dilution: Grant of 1,695,000 options could increase shares outstanding if exercised, affecting existing shareholders.
- Insufficient disclosure: Form 4 does not provide total shares outstanding or board approval details to assess materiality fully.
Insights
TL;DR: Large option grant to CEO could affect dilution and aligns management with equity performance.
The disclosed grant of 1,695,000 options at $1.74 strikes is a material compensation event for management, increasing potential common shares outstanding if exercised. The long ten-year term and multi-year vesting tie executive incentives to long-term share performance. Without additional context on total shares outstanding or prior grants, the exact dilution and expense impact cannot be quantified from this filing alone.
TL;DR: Standard multi-year vesting and long exercise window; requires disclosure context for full governance assessment.
The vesting schedule—25% after one year then monthly over three years—is a common structure to retain leadership. The form confirms the reporting person is both CEO and a 10% owner, which is relevant for oversight and related-party considerations. The filing itself provides clear mechanics but lacks comparative context such as board approval details or prior awards.