ESGL (NASDAQ: ESGL) highlights unanimous jury win for De Tomaso in New York case
Rhea-AI Filing Summary
ESGL Holdings Limited filed a Form 6-K to highlight a unanimous jury verdict in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York in favor of De Tomaso Automobili Holdings Limited and its owner, Norman Choi.
The jury rejected claims by former CEO Ryan Berris, confirming he held no equity in De Tomaso and had no contractual right to the compensation he alleged, including any bespoke limited edition supercar. The jury also found for De Tomaso on its counterclaims for breach of fiduciary duty and awarded damages.
The verdict resolves previously disclosed litigation and confirms De Tomaso and Mr. Choi have been cleared of all allegations of fraud, dishonesty, or unjust action. ESGL continues to work toward closing its proposed business combination with De Tomaso, which remains subject to Nasdaq approval and customary closing conditions, with no assurance of completion.
Positive
- None.
Negative
- None.
Insights
Litigation overhang on ESGL’s De Tomaso deal is removed, but the merger still faces approvals.
The unanimous jury verdict in favor of De Tomaso Automobili Holdings Limited and Norman Choi eliminates a previously disclosed lawsuit risk tied to De Tomaso’s former CEO. The jury rejected his equity and compensation claims and awarded damages on De Tomaso’s breach of fiduciary duty counterclaims.
This outcome clarifies that De Tomaso and Mr. Choi have been cleared of allegations of fraud, dishonesty, or unjust action, which can reduce legal and reputational uncertainty around the brand. However, the proposed business combination between ESGL and De Tomaso still depends on Nasdaq approval and customary closing conditions, and the companies explicitly note there is no assurance the transaction will close.
FAQ
What did ESGL (ESGL) report about the De Tomaso litigation outcome?
The company reported a unanimous jury verdict in favor of De Tomaso Automobili Holdings Limited and owner Norman Choi. The jury rejected claims by former CEO Ryan Berris and awarded damages to De Tomaso on its breach of fiduciary duty counterclaims.
How did the jury rule on former CEO Ryan Berris’s claims against De Tomaso?
The jury rejected all claims brought by former CEO Ryan Berris. It confirmed he held no equity interest in De Tomaso and had no contractual entitlement to the compensation he alleged, including any bespoke limited edition supercar.
Did the jury find De Tomaso or Norman Choi liable for fraud or dishonesty?
No. The verdict confirms De Tomaso and Norman Choi have been cleared of all allegations of fraud, dishonesty, or unjust action. This resolves the previously disclosed litigation referenced in ESGL’s public filings.
What happened with De Tomaso’s counterclaims in the New York case mentioned by ESGL?
The jury found in favor of De Tomaso on its counterclaims for breach of fiduciary duty. It awarded damages to De Tomaso, reinforcing the favorable overall outcome referenced by ESGL in its Form 6-K and accompanying press release.
How does this jury verdict relate to ESGL’s proposed business combination with De Tomaso?
The verdict removes a previously disclosed litigation issue involving De Tomaso and its owner. ESGL states it continues working toward closing the proposed business combination with De Tomaso, which remains subject to Nasdaq approval and customary closing conditions.
Is the ESGL–De Tomaso business combination now guaranteed to close after the verdict?
No. ESGL notes that the proposed business combination with De Tomaso remains subject to Nasdaq approval and customary closing conditions. The company explicitly states there is no assurance that the transaction will be completed.