Hyatt Insider Filing: 178 Restricted Stock Units Issued to Director (H)
Rhea-AI Filing Summary
Jason Pritzker, a director and reported 10% owner of Hyatt Hotels Corporation (H), was issued 178 restricted stock units (RSUs) on 09/15/2025. Each RSU represents the contingent right to one share of Class A Common Stock and the RSUs are fully vested. The filing reports 31,544 shares of Class A Common Stock beneficially owned by the reporting person following the transaction. The RSUs have a reported price of $0 and will be settled in Class A Common Stock upon the termination of Mr. Pritzker's service as a director. The Form 4 was signed by Margaret C. Egan as attorney-in-fact on 09/16/2025.
Positive
- 178 RSUs fully vested under Hyatt's long-term incentive and director compensation plans
- RSUs settle in Class A Common Stock, aligning director compensation with shareholder equity
- No cash consideration required ($0 price) for these RSUs as disclosed in the filing
Negative
- None.
Insights
TL;DR: Modest insider compensation event: 178 vested RSUs increase reported ownership to 31,544 shares; no cash paid.
The transaction is compensation-related, not a market purchase or sale, and shows the issuance and vesting of 178 RSUs granted under Hyatt's long-term incentive and director compensation plans. Because the RSUs are fully vested and payable only upon director service termination, the economic impact is deferred. The reported ownership figure (31,544 shares) provides a snapshot of total exposure but does not indicate any immediate share issuance to the market. Impact to shareholders is likely immaterial in isolation.
TL;DR: Routine director compensation disclosure; fully vested RSUs documented per company plans.
The Form 4 documents standard director compensation administered through Hyatt's Fifth Amended and Restated Long-Term Incentive Plan and the Non-Employee Director Compensation Program. The filing clarifies grant terms: RSUs are vested and settle in Class A Common Stock upon termination of director service. The involvement of an attorney-in-fact in signing is a common administrative practice. This filing raises no immediate governance concerns based on the disclosed facts.