Health Catalyst COO reports 3,663-share sell-to-cover at $3.36
Rhea-AI Filing Summary
Daniel LeSueur, Chief Operating Officer of Health Catalyst, Inc. (HCAT), reported a sale of 3,663 shares of the issuer's common stock on 09/02/2025 at a price of $3.3627 per share. The filing states this sale was a mandatory "sell to cover" to satisfy tax-withholding obligations arising from the vesting of restricted stock units and not a discretionary trade. After the transaction, the reporting person beneficially owned 198,367 shares. The Form 4 was signed by Benjamin Landry as attorney-in-fact on 09/04/2025. The report documents an insider compliance action rather than an open-market decision.
Positive
- Compliance with equity plan: The sale was conducted under the issuer's mandated "sell-to-cover" tax withholding procedure.
- Transparent reporting: Transaction date, share count, price, and post-transaction holdings are clearly disclosed in the Form 4.
Negative
- Reduction in direct holdings: The reporting person sold 3,663 shares, decreasing reported direct ownership to 198,367 shares.
Insights
TL;DR: Reported sale is a routine sell-to-cover for RSU tax withholding and indicates adherence to the company's equity plan, not an opportunistic sale.
The Form 4 discloses a non-discretionary sale of 3,663 shares at $3.3627 per share to satisfy tax obligations on vested restricted stock units. Such transactions are standard under many equity plans when companies mandate sell-to-cover to meet withholding requirements. The filing documents compliance and transparency; it does not provide evidence of a change in executive sentiment or a voluntary reduction in exposure beyond tax-related mechanics.
TL;DR: Small, mandated disposition with limited informational content for investors; changes reported precisely in holdings.
The transaction reduced direct beneficial ownership by 3,663 shares, leaving 198,367 shares reported as held. The per-share price of $3.3627 is disclosed, and the sale is explicitly tied to withholding for RSU vesting. As a single, plan-driven transaction, it is unlikely to be material to valuation or indicate a shift in insider conviction absent other disclosures.