STOCK TITAN

Werewolf Therapeutics plans Ambros merger, $150M raise

Ambros says neridronate’s patient-selection patent is granted, with an expiration date in 2045.

Available on EDGAR Accepted by SEC EDGAR Learn about SEC filing dates
(Moderate)

Sentiment and the balance of points

Rhea-AI Sentiment reads the wording of the document, how positive or negative its language is on a 1 to 5 scale. The balance of points shown with the takes weighs what the document actually discloses, so the two can disagree, for example when a trial that missed its main goal is described in upbeat language.

Form Type
425

Rhea-AI Filing Summary

Werewolf Therapeutics (HOWL) disclosed a pending reverse triangular merger with Ambros Therapeutics and a concurrent $150 million PIPE financing. The companies expect to close in the fourth quarter of 2026; after closing, the combined company is expected to be renamed Ambros Therapeutics, Inc. and trade on Nasdaq as “AMBX.” Ambros’ implied valuation is $500 million before the PIPE, and Werewolf’s implied valuation is $47.5 million. The stated pro forma ownership is approximately 72.0% for Ambros holders, 6.4% for Werewolf holders and 21.6% for PIPE investors.

Ambros says PIPE proceeds are expected to fund the CRPS-RISE pivotal trial, regulatory work through NDA submission, select pre-commercial activities and general corporate purposes. The recruiting Phase 3 trial tests intravenous neridronate against placebo; FDA feedback indicates a single successful Phase 3 study may be sufficient to support an NDA submission. An interim analysis could stop the trial early for efficacy if a prespecified threshold is met, and Ambros projects topline data in 2028. Ambros also reports approximately $103 million in cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments as of June 30, 2026, on an unaudited management basis.

1 point · 1 major

How this balance works

Rhea-AI gives every point it takes from this document a weight. Minor counts 1, Moderate 3 and Major 9, so one Major point outweighs several Minor ones. The bar adds up the weights on each side, and when neither side holds more than 65% of the total the balance reads Mixed.

It reads the document as published, with the same rules for every company, and it does not look at what the market expected or at how the stock traded, so a point can be objectively good on a day the stock falls.

Rhea-AI Sentiment measures something else, the tone of the wording.

0 major · 0 points

Hollow bars mark forward-looking points. How the balance works

Positive

  • Major point. Forward-looking: it has not happened yet and may not happen.Pending $150 million PIPE is expected to fund CRPS-RISE through NDA submission. 3.1× market cap

Negative

  • None.

Filing Explained

Post-close, Abiogen is projected to own over five percent while receiving a product-cost markup and a separate sales royalty.

With the merger and PIPE still pending, Ambros projects neridronate will be fully funded through NDA submission.

Under Ambros’s license, it pays Abiogen product cost plus a low-double-digit markup and a separate mid-single-digit royalty on aggregate annual net sales; the presentation says Abiogen would own more than 5% of Ambros after closing.

Concurrent PIPE financing $150 million Proposed financing included with the merger
Ambros implied valuation $500 million Before the concurrent PIPE
Werewolf implied valuation $47.5 million Transaction valuation
Pro forma ownership for Ambros holders Approximately 72.0% At closing
Pro forma ownership for Werewolf holders Approximately 6.4% At closing
Pro forma ownership for concurrent financing investors Approximately 21.6% At closing
Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments Approximately $103 million Ambros management figure as of June 30, 2026; unaudited
reverse triangular merger financial
"Transaction Structure Reverse triangular merger"
A reverse triangular merger is a deal structure where a buyer creates a new company it controls, that new company is merged into the target, and the target company continues to exist as a subsidiary of the buyer. Think of the buyer building a small box, inserting it into the seller’s box, and then making the seller sit inside the buyer’s group while keeping its shape. Investors care because this structure can change how shareholders are paid or exchanged, who carries legal liabilities, and how quickly the deal closes, all of which affect value and risk.
Concurrent PIPE Financing financial
"the concurrent private placement financing"
group sequential design technical
"interim analysis with a group sequential design"
triple-phase bone scan (TPBS) medical
"Positive TPBS supports neridronate"
Orphan exclusivity regulatory
"7-year Orphan exclusivity"

FAQ

AI-generated questions and answers. How Rhea-AI works. Not financial advice.

How large is the HOWL-Ambros concurrent PIPE financing?

The proposed transaction includes a $150 million concurrent PIPE financing, co-led by RA Capital Management and Janus Henderson Investors. Ambros says proceeds are expected to fund the CRPS-RISE trial, regulatory activities through NDA submission, select pre-commercial activities, working capital and other general corporate purposes.

When is the HOWL merger with Ambros expected to close?

The companies expect the merger and concurrent financing to close in the fourth quarter of 2026. Ambros is to survive as a wholly owned Werewolf subsidiary; after closing, the combined company is expected to be renamed Ambros Therapeutics, Inc. and trade on Nasdaq under the ticker AMBX.

What is the HOWL-Ambros CRPS-RISE trial testing?

CRPS-RISE is a pivotal Phase 3 study of intravenous neridronate versus placebo in patients with CRPS-1. The planned design randomizes approximately 135 participants to each arm, with 100 mg administered on days 1, 4, 7 and 10. The primary endpoint is change in pain intensity at week 12; an interim analysis could stop the study early for efficacy if its prespecified threshold is met.

AI-generated analysis. How Rhea-AI works. Not financial advice.

See more from StockTitan in Google Search and AI answers. Adds StockTitan as a preferred source · opens Google
Add on Google
Filed by Werewolf Therapeutics, Inc. pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and deemed filed pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended

Subject Company: Werewolf Therapeutics, Inc. (File No. 001-40366)

 Analyst Day  November 2026 
 

 2  Disclaimer  This presentation and the accompanying slides and oral commentary (this “Presentation”) have been prepared by Ambros Therapeutics, Inc. (“Ambros,” “we,” “us” or the “Company”) for informational purposes only.  This Presentation has been prepared based on information the Company considers reliable, but no representation or warranty, express or implied, is given by the Company, its affiliates, directors, officers, employees or advisers or any other person as to the accuracy or completeness of the contents hereof. The information contained herein is subject to change.  Forward-Looking Statements  This Presentation contains forward-looking statements. Such statements include, but are not limited to, statements about the Company, the proposed merger between Ambros and Werewolf Therapeutics, Inc. (“Werewolf”) and the concurrent private placement financing (the “Concurrent PIPE Financing” and, together with the proposed merger, the “Transactions”); expectations regarding the completion, timing and anticipated effects, benefits and opportunities of the Transactions; Ambros’ expectations regarding the use of proceeds from the Concurrent PIPE Financing; estimated cash at closing of the proposed merger and cash runway expectations, including expectations regarding the Company’s ability to fund operations through key clinical milestones; research and clinical development activities; plans and projected timelines for neridronate; plans regarding regulatory filings; expectations regarding the relative benefits of neridronate compared with competitive therapies; and expectations regarding the therapeutic and commercial potential of neridronate. The words “believe,” “may,” “will,” “estimate,” “plan,” “continue,” “anticipate,” “expect,” “potential” and similar expressions (including the negative thereof) are intended to identify forward-looking statements.  Because such statements are subject to risks and uncertainties, actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Risks that contribute to the uncertain nature of the forward-looking statements include, among others: the inability to consummate the Transactions, including due to a failure to obtain the requisite stockholder approvals or satisfy other closing conditions; costs related to the proposed Transactions; potential litigation or disruption to the Company’s operations related to the Transactions; clinical trials may not be successful; the results of the interim analysis of CRPS-RISE may not meet the prespecified statistical threshold required to stop the trial early for efficacy, and CRPS-RISE may be required to continue through its planned enrollment, treatment and follow-up period to a final analysis; the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) may not agree with interpretations of data from clinical trials of neridronate or may require additional clinical or other data; delays in the commencement, enrollment, completion or analysis of clinical testing for neridronate, or in the reporting of data from such clinical testing; significant issues regarding the adequacy of clinical trial designs or the execution of clinical trials may arise, which could result in increased costs and delays or limit the ability to obtain regulatory approval; neridronate may not receive regulatory approval or be successfully commercialized; unexpected adverse side effects or inadequate therapeutic efficacy of neridronate could delay or prevent regulatory approval or commercialization; and the Company may not be able to obtain additional financing.  For a further discussion of these and other risks and uncertainties, see the registration statement on Form S-4 filed by Werewolf with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), as amended, including the section entitled “Risk Factors,” and other documents filed by Werewolf with the SEC. All forward-looking statements contained in this Presentation speak only as of the date on which they were made, and the Company undertakes no obligation to update such statements to reflect events that occur or circumstances that exist after the date on which they were made, except as required by applicable law.  Important Additional Information and Where to Find It  In connection with the proposed transaction between Werewolf and Ambros, Werewolf has filed with the SEC a registration statement on Form S-4, which includes a preliminary proxy statement relating to the proposed transaction and a prospectus of Werewolf (the “Proxy Statement/Prospectus”). Werewolf may also file other relevant documents with the SEC regarding the proposed transaction. This Presentation is not a substitute for the Proxy Statement/Prospectus or any other document that Werewolf has filed or may file with the SEC or send to stockholders of Werewolf or Ambros in connection with the proposed transaction. After the registration statement is declared effective, the definitive Proxy Statement/Prospectus will be mailed to stockholders of Werewolf.  INVESTORS AND SECURITYHOLDERS OF WEREWOLF ARE URGED TO READ THE REGISTRATION STATEMENT, THE PROXY STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS AND ALL OTHER RELEVANT DOCUMENTS FILED OR THAT WILL BE FILED WITH THE SEC CAREFULLY AND IN THEIR ENTIRETY BECAUSE THEY CONTAIN OR WILL CONTAIN IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT WEREWOLF, AMBROS AND THE PROPOSED TRANSACTION.  Investors and securityholders may obtain free copies of the registration statement, the Proxy Statement/Prospectus and other documents filed with the SEC by Werewolf through the website maintained by the SEC at www.sec.gov. Copies of documents filed with the SEC by Werewolf are also available free of charge on Werewolf’s website at https://investors.werewolftx.com/financial-information/sec-filings.  No Offer or Solicitation  This Presentation is for informational purposes only and is not intended to and does not constitute an offer to subscribe for, buy or sell, or the solicitation of an offer to subscribe for, buy or sell, or an invitation to subscribe for, buy or sell, any securities of Werewolf or Ambros, or the solicitation of a proxy, consent, vote or approval in any jurisdiction pursuant to or in connection with the proposed transaction or otherwise, nor shall there be any sale, issuance or transfer of securities in any jurisdiction in contravention of applicable law. No offer of securities shall be made except by means of a prospectus meeting the requirements of Section 10 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or pursuant to an applicable exemption from the registration requirements thereof, and otherwise in accordance with applicable law.  NEITHER THE SEC NOR ANY STATE SECURITIES COMMISSION HAS APPROVED OR DISAPPROVED OF THE SECURITIES OR DETERMINED IF THIS PRESENTATION IS TRUTHFUL OR COMPLETE.  Participants in the Solicitation  This Presentation is not a solicitation of a proxy from any securityholder of Werewolf or Ambros. However, Werewolf and Ambros and certain of their respective directors and executive officers may be deemed to be participants in the solicitation of proxies in connection with the proposed transaction. Information regarding Werewolf’s directors and executive officers is contained in Werewolf’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025, filed with the SEC on March 27, 2026, and in subsequent documents filed with the SEC.  Information regarding persons who may be deemed participants in the solicitation of proxies in connection with the proposed transaction, including a description of their direct and indirect interests, by security holdings or otherwise, is contained in the Proxy Statement/Prospectus included in Werewolf’s registration statement on Form S-4, as amended, including under the sections entitled “The Merger—Interests of Werewolf’s Directors and Executive Officers in the Merger” and “The Merger—Interests of Ambros’ Directors and Executive Officers in the Merger.” Such documents may be obtained free of charge from the sources indicated above.  Third-Party Trademarks  This Presentation may contain trademarks, service marks, trade names and copyrights of third parties, which are the property of their respective owners. Solely for convenience, trademarks and trade names referred to in this Presentation may appear without the ™, SM, © or ® symbols, but such references are not intended to indicate, in any way, that the applicable owner will not assert, to the fullest extent under applicable law, its rights thereto.  Disclaimers 
 

 3  Ambros Analyst Day Agenda  Introduction and Corporate Overview  Jay Hagan   Werewolf Transaction and Concurrent Financing  Cris Calsada  Complex Regional Pain Syndrome Overview  Gail Cawkwell, MD, PhD  Neridronate: Mechanism, Clinical Evidence to Date, and Ongoing Trial  Gail Cawkwell, MD, PhD  Market Opportunity and IP  Kunal Kishnani  Strong Capital Position and Looking Ahead   Jay Hagan 
 

 Christopher Aker  General Counsel  General Counsel at Regulus Therapeutics  Corporate Counsel & Senior Director of Administration at Phenomix Corp  Corporate Counsel at Cureline  Jennifer Lam  SVP Finance and Administration  SVP Finance and Administration at Reneo Pharmaceuticals   VP of Finance at Amplyx Pharmaceuticals  Corporate Controller at Dendreon  Gail Cawkwell, MD, PhD  Chief Medical Officer  CMO of Aclaris Therapeutics  SVP of Medical Affairs at Intercept Pharmaceuticals  CMO of Purdue Pharma  VP of Medical Affairs, R&D at Pfizer  Board of Directors:  4  Experienced Leadership Team  Keith Katkin  Chairman  Jay Hagan  President & CEO  CEO of Regulus Therapeutics  CFO/CBO of Orexigen Therapeutics  Managing Director of Amgen Ventures  Kunal Kishnani  SVP Corporate Development  President of Rare Disease at Kriya Therapeutics  Founder & CEO of Warden Bio  Co-Founder and Head of Operations at Genevant  Cris Calsada  Chief Financial Officer  CFO of Regulus Therapeutics  CFO of Sanifit Therapeutics  COO of Ambrx Biopharma  Prisca Di Martino  Director  Abiogen Pharma  Matthew Hammond, PhD  Director  RA Capital Management  Trit Garg, MD  Director  Longitude Capital  John C. Jacobs  Director  Novavax  Scott Robertson  Director  Star Therapeutics  Claire Padgett, PhD  SVP of Clinical Operations and Program Management  SVP of Clinical Operations at Regulus Therapeutics  Principal Consultant at Constellation Consulting  SVP Developmental Operations at Sanifit Therapeutics 
 

 5  History of Strong and Rapid Execution Since Founding  September 2024  Ambros’ Inception  December 2024  Signed the License for Neridronate with Abiogen  Late 2024/Early 2025  $12.5 million Seed Financing  April 2025  Aligned with the FDA on One Phase 3 Trial of Neridronate for Potential Approval  December 2025  $125 million Series A  March 2026  Ambros Received Notice of Allowance for Neridronate’s Method of Use Patent, Potentially Extending Exclusivity to 2045  June 2026  Dosed the First Patient in the CRPS-RISE trial  August 2026  Announced the Proposed Merger Between Ambros and Werewolf and Concurrent $150 million PIPE  October 2026  Aligned with the FDA on including an Interim Analysis in the CRPS-RISE trial 
 

 Neridronate has the potential to become the first and only FDA-approved medicine for Complex Regional Pain Syndrome Type 1 (CRPS-1)  CRPS-1 Rare Disease Burden  ~65,000 newly diagnosed individuals each year in the U.S.1  Severely painful and debilitating condition following injury  Long-lasting disability; may become permanent  No FDA-approved medicines; current pharmacological therapies have limited to no efficacy2  Neridronate Highlights  Single Phase 3 for Approval in the U.S.4  Potential Blockbuster Opportunity  Differentiated bisphosphonate administered intravenously (IV)  Extensive clinical data, including 2 successful ItalianPhase 3 trials in CRPS  Approved in Italy for CRPS3  FDA granted Breakthrough Therapy, Fast Track, & Orphan Drug Designations  FDA alignment on single pivotal Phase 3 study (CRPS-RISE, currently recruiting) for approval  Projected to be fully funded through NDA submission  Large healthcare and patient burden1; first mover advantage via potential U.S. approval  To our knowledge, there are no other clinical-stage therapies for the treatment of CRPS-1 in other pharma or biotech pipelines  Expected US market exclusivity through 2045  6  Ambros analysis of incident CRPS-1 patients from the Komodo Healthcare Map claims (n = 189,483); analysis also quantifies disease burden through elevated rates of mobility loss, long‑term disability (SSDI), opioid use disorder, and depression vs. non‑CRPS individuals.  Fassio, Pharmacological treatment in adult patients with CRPS-1: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Rheumatology 2022  Italian commercialization rights are not held by Ambros  FDA feedback indicates a single successful Phase 3 study may be sufficient to support NDA submission 
 

 7  Pending Transaction with Werewolf Therapeutics and Concurrent Financing 
 

 Transaction Highlights  8  Transaction Structure  Reverse triangular merger of a wholly owned subsidiary of Werewolf Therapeutics (public company) with and into Ambros Therapeutics (private company)  Ambros survives as a wholly owned subsidiary of Werewolf  Post-closing, the combined company will be renamed Ambros Therapeutics, Inc. and trade on Nasdaq under the ticker symbol "AMBX"  Valuation & Ownership  Anticipated pro forma value of combined company at closing: ~$697.5M  Implied valuation for Ambros: $500M (before concurrent PIPE)  Implied valuation for Werewolf: $47.5M1  Concurrent PIPE financing: $150M, co-led by RA Capital Management and Janus Henderson Investors  Pro forma ownership split at closing: ~72.0% Ambros, ~6.4% Werewolf, ~21.6% Concurrent Financing investors  Use of Proceeds  Expected to fund the completion of CRPS-RISE pivotal trial, regulatory activities through NDA submission, select pre-commercial activities, as well as for working capital and other general corporate purposes  Projected Timing  Expect to close the definitive agreement and concurrent financing in the fourth quarter of 2026  Consists of $30M assumed net cash at closing and $17.5M Nasdaq listing value. Werewolf’s legacy pipeline is addressed through a CVR.  
 

 9  Complex Regional Pain Syndrome Type 1 (CRPS-1): a debilitating disease with no approved US therapy 
 

 CRPS-1 is an orphan disease with ~65,000 newly diagnosed individuals each year in the U.S.2  CRPS-1 is a progressive, debilitating orphan disease typically triggered by injury or trauma, such as bone fractures or limb surgeries  Considered among the most painful of all known diseases with high unmet need  Extremely severe, continuous, disabling limb pain that is disproportionate to initial injury1  Occurs more frequently in women; typical age of onset between 40 and 60 years old but can occur at any age1  Patients with CRPS-1 may experience sleep disturbance and meaningful diminished quality of life and independence1  Associated with significant increases in depression as well as opioid use disorder as compared to U.S. individuals without CRPS-12  No FDA-approved therapies to address the underlying disease biology or progression  Common pain meds (e.g., NSAIDs, opioids, gabapentin) have shown limited efficacy3  Expensive and ineffective procedures such as sympathetic nerve blocks, sympathectomies, and spinal cord stimulation are used despite limited efficacy3  Established Budapest Clinical Diagnostic Criteria confirm CRPS-1 diagnosis4  CRPS-1 comprises ~90% of all CRPS cases5  CRPS Type 2 (CRPS-2) is diagnosed with evidence of nerve damage4  10  Harden et al. Complex Regional Pain Syndrome: Practical Diagnostic and Treatment Guidelines, Pain Med. 2013  Ambros analysis of incident CRPS-1 patients from the Komodo Healthcare Map claims (n = 189,483)   Fassio, Pharmacological treatment in adult patients with CRPS-1: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Rheumatology 2022  Harden RN, Bruehl S, Perez RSGM, et al. Validation of proposed diagnostic criteria (the "Budapest Criteria") for CRPS. Pain, 2010  Sandroni. Complex regional pain syndrome type 1: incidence and prevalence in Olmsted County, a population-based study. Pain, 2003 
 

 CRPS-1 progresses through stages of increasing severity post-injury~50% of patients in the U.S. are currently diagnosed within first 6 months of symptom onset1  Stage 1: “Warm” Phase (typically 0-12 months post-injury)2  Burning pain, allodynia, hyperalgesia  Increased warmth and redness in the affected limb  Swelling, sweating, shiny skin  Abnormal nail growth or rapid hair growth on the affected limb  Difficulty bending or moving the affected limb due to pain and stiffness  Typically associated with positive triple-phase bone scan (TPBS) reading3  Stage 2: “Cold” Phase (typically >12 months post-injury)  Severe, persistent pain, vasoconstriction, and limb discoloration (icy, pale, or blue)  While symptoms may spontaneously resolve, patients who forgo early treatment during the warm phase face elevated risk of chronicity, recurrence, or irreversible disease progression4  11  Primary market research with physicians and CRPS experts conducted by Aquest  Ambros post-hoc analysis of pooled baseline assessments of warm symptoms against time since CRPS onset across the four Grünenthal and two Abiogen studies (n = 189)  Wertli et al. Usefulness of bone scintigraphy for the diagnosis of Complex Regional Pain Syndrome 1: A systematic review and Bayesian meta-analysis. PLoS One 2017.   Harvard Medical School, Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS). March 11, 2026.  
 

 12  CRPS treatment in the US largely focuses on pain management, but most treatments have little efficacy  Srinivasa N Raja, Asokumar Buvanendran & Lizandra Marcondes (2021) Complex Regional Pain Syndrome: A Comprehensive Qualitative Research Study on Unmet Needs in the “Patient Journey”, Journal of Pain Research, , 2391-2401, DOI: 10.2147/ JPR.S317648  Angelo Fassio et al (2022) Pharmacological treatment in adult patients with CRPS-1: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Rheumatology 61:3534-3546  Nerve Blocks  *Some HCPs choose Nerve blocks as a first line treatment with PT *Used as a diagnostic tool  OTC Topical & Oral  (NSAIDs, Analgesics, Lidocaine)  Steroids  *Used temporarily in conjunction with PT if CRPS is caught early  Anti-depressants  (SNRIs, TCAs, SSRIs)  *HCPs note that duloxetine is useful for patients experiencing problems with sleep  Anticonvulsants  (Gabapentin, Pregabalin, Topiramate)*Insurance companies require HCPs to try Gabapentin before moving to Pregabalin  Combinations of Anti-depressants and anticonvulsants   Acupuncture, Hyperbaric Chamber, Combination Topicals, Calcitonin, Lidocaine Infusions  Narcotics & Intrathecal Pump  Spinal Cord Stimulator (SCS)  Ketamine infusions  Physical Therapy  Cognitive Behavioral & Occupational Therapy  Narcotics  Nerve Blocks  Steroids improved pain by 3.84 mm  NSAIDs improved pain by 0.47 mm  Anti-epileptics worsened pain by 8.00 mm  Ketamineimproved pain by 8.27 mm  First LineTreatments  Last LineTreatments  In a 2022 systematic review of clinical trials for CRPS  A 10 mm difference on a 100 mm visual analogue scale is generally considered clinically relevant 
 

 13  Neridronate: mechanism and clinical evidence to date 
 

 Neridronate is a differentiated bisphosphonate approved in Italy for the treatment of several bone disorders including CRPS1  Originally developed by Abiogen Pharma S.p.A. under the trade name NERIXIA®  Approved in Italy for the treatment of Osteogenesis Imperfecta, Paget’s Disease, and CRPS1  We have licensed commercialization rights in the United States, Canada, and Mexico from Abiogen  Cumulative estimated patient exposure of approximately 600,000 to date (all indications) in Italy2  Neridronate  (6-Amino-1-hydroxyhexane-1, 1-diphosphonic acid monosodium salt hemihydrate)  14  NERIXIA Italian approval label. Italian commercialization rights are not held by Ambros.  Neridronate 2025 Periodic Safety Update Report (Internal). 
 

 Derived from: Varenna M. Bisphosphonates beyond their anti-osteoclastic properties The lesson of complex regional pain syndrome. Rheumatology 2014;53:965-7, Tzschentke TM. Pharmacology of bisphosphonates in pain. Br J Pharmacol. 2021; 178: 1973–1994. https://doi.org/10.1111/bph.14799, Maksymowych WP. Bisphosphonates. Anti-inflammatory properties. Curr Med Chem Anti Inflamm Anti Allergy Agents 2002;1:1528, Jena, L.N., Bennie, L.A., McErlean, E.M. et al. Exploiting the anticancer effects of a nitrogen bisphosphonate nanomedicine for glioblastoma multiforme. J Nanobiotechnol 19, 127 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12951-021-00856-x, Leitha T, Korpan M, Staudenherz A et al. Five phase bone scintigraphy supports the pathophysiological concept of a subclinical inflammatory process in reflex sympathetic dystrophy. Q J Nucl Med 1996;40:18893.Slide represents proposed disease processes and mechanism of action of neridronate.  IL-6: Interleukin 6.  TNF: Tumor necrosis factor.  NGF: Nerve growth factor.  Anticipated action is beyond an osteoporosis or an analgesic effect  15  Neridronate is expected to focus on the underlying disease drivers when used in the right CRPS-1 patients at the right disease stage  Trauma leads to local tissue hostile environment  Positive TPBS supports neridronate will concentrate in the target limb  Release and activation of monocytes, macrophages and keratinocytes  NERIDRONATE  Inhibits monocyte, macrophage and keratinocyte production and activation  Hydroxyapatite crystal dissolution  NERIDRONATE  Decreased osteoblast and osteocyte apoptosis  Inhibits farnesyl pyrophosphate synthase, GTPase post-translational modifications  Increased Release of Substance P and CGRP  NERIDRONATE  Inhibits farnesyl pyrophosphate synthase and GTPase post-translational modifications  Inhibits local calcium influx  Inhibits gliosis associated with neuropathic pain  UNTREATED  Release of pro-inflammatory  mediators (IL-6, TNF, NGF)  UNTREATED  Local Inflammation: Red, Warm, Swollen, Painful  UNTREATED  Local Osteoporosis  UNTREATED  Local Swelling, Pain  CRPS-1 Disease State  TREATED Neridronate activity in CRPS-1  Who are the right patients?  CRPS-1:   bone-focused disease  Positive TPBS:   right treatment in the right limb  Warm phase:   Inflammatory signs and symptoms  Generally, these occur within 6-12 months of onset 
 

 100 mg neridronate or placebo administered intravenously (IV) on days 1, 4, 7, and 10*  Primary endpoint of pain intensity assessed by visual analog scale (VAS, range 0-100 mm) at day 40  Open-label placebo cross-over phase after 10-day washout  Key inclusion criteria:  Confirmed diagnosis of CRPS-1  No longer than 4 months since onset of symptoms  Positive TPBS  Successful Abiogen Phase 3 study in warm CRPS-1 patients with confirmed bone involvement supported Italian approval of neridronate   Neridronate achieved the primary endpoint of ≥50% reduction in pain intensity score vs. placebo (p=0.0003) and reduced pain intensity score vs. placebo‡ (p<0.0001) in Abiogen's NERIAS Phase 3 study  Significant improvements observed across secondary endpoints of pain and quality of life (McGill Pain Questionnaire and SF-36), edema, allodynia, hyperalgesia, and pain at motion vs. placebo  Responses similar whether treated initially or after day 40+ washout  Successful results replicated in Abiogen’s subsequent NAIMES Phase 3 study in CRPS-1 with intramuscular (IM) neridronate in Italy  16  Placebo Cross-over  Pain VAS  Days  Double-blind  n= 82  D D D D  D D D D  D: IV study treatment dosed. IV: Intravenous. IM: Intramuscular.  *Varenna M et al. Treatment of complex regional pain syndrome type 1 with neridronate: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2013 Mar;52(3):534-42  ‡ This is the primary endpoint in CRPS-RISE 
 

 NAIMES achieved primary endpoint measured at Day 30: 65.9% of neridronate-treated versus 29.7% on placebo achieved at least a 50% improvement in pain (p=0.0017)  Following completion of the double-blind portion of the Phase 3 IM study, placebo participants were treated with 400 mg IV neridronate (4 doses of 100 mg)  Benefits on pain reduction, clinical and functional measures were maintained and further improved over 12 months in most patients treated with neridronate administered either IM or IV  ≥88% of subjects in both groups were defined as responders (≥50% improvement in pain) at 12 months  Durable, potentially disease-modifying effects observed in long-term studies: clinical trial and real-world data  D: IV study treatment dosed. IV: Intravenous. IM: Intramuscular.  Varenna M et al. Intramuscular neridronate for the treatment of complex regional pain syndrome type 1: a randomized, double -blind, placebo -controlled study. Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. 2021 Jun 11;13:1759720X211014020.   G. Adami et al. Long-term effectiveness and predictors of bisphosphonate treatment in type 1 complex regional pain syndrome. Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology 2024; 42: 961 -966  Phase 3 NAIMES Study in CRPS-1 with IM / IV Neridronate (n = 78)1  Real-world longitudinal study conducted by Italian investigators with 400 mg IV neridronate  78% reduction in pain over 12 months, with improvements sustained up to 3+ years; early VAS pain intensity reduction was significantly and strongly associated to lower loss of motion at month 12  >84% of patients achieved resolution of key symptoms such as hyperalgesia and allodynia by month 12  17  ****  DDDD  Longitudinal, observational real-world study in CRPS-1 (n=103)2  DDDD  Double-blind IM Tx Phase (to Day 30)  Off treatment follow up (Days 60 to 360)  Wash out(Days 30-40)  Placebo IV Tx Phase (day 40-60) 
 

 In 2013, Grünenthal licensed rights to neridronate and ran two global Phase 3 clinical trials1  Positive Grünenthal study was driven by subset of participants with CRPS-1 and warm subtype findings at baseline  18  Ambros is building on the successful Abiogen studies in warm phase CRPS-1  Also conducted dose-ranging studies (supporting existing dose/regimen) and large 1-year safety study  Enrolled all CRPS types (1, 2)  No TPBS required for inclusion; majority beyond warm phase  Terminated trials early due to interim futility analysis and then returned rights to Abiogen  Final analysis of trials showed one positive study (p=0.0111) and one negative study (p=0.2522)  Protocol Element  Grünenthal  Abiogen  Ambros  Positive TPBS  No  Yes  Yes  CRPS -1 Subtype  75%  100%  100%  Phase of Disease  Warm/Cold  Early/Warm  Early/Warm  Symptom Duration  < 24 Months  < 4 Months  < 6 Months  Grünenthal GmbH. Phase 3 trials of intravenous neridronic acid in CRPS: KF7013-02 (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03530345; EudraCT 2016-003833-91) and KF7013-04 (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03560986; EudraCT 2017-004244-37). Both trials discontinued following a pre-planned interim futility analysis; company clinical study reports.  Neridronate has also been evaluated in a broader, “all-comers” CRPS population 
 

 19  Neridronate efficacy in CRPS aligns with mechanism of action:Better response in bone-focused type, with warm phase signs  Participants with CRPS-1 improved by 1.6 points on a scale where a 1-pt improvement is relevant  Those with CRPS-2 had ~ no response in this Grünenthal study (post hoc analysis)  Analysis including those not warm, no TPBS and adjusts for baseline pain  Week 12 Pain (0-10 NRS) Improvement  Adjusted for baseline pain, placebo-subtracted  0  2  0.4  0.8  1.2  1.6  CRPS-1  CRPS-2  Better responses in the more bone-focused CRPS-1 than 2  Better responses in with warm-phase than without  Baseline swelling, degree of swelling associated with a bigger effect size on pain at the end of the trial across 3 studies in this post hoc analysis  (adjusted for baseline pain)  Baseline Limb Redness and/or ~ Warmth Doubles the Mean Pain Difference  Trial KF7013-02 (11-point NRS)  Subgroup  Treatment Arm  Mean Change at 12 Weeks  Mean Diff  (+) Red and/or warm affected limb at baseline  Neridronate (n=7)  -1.75  -2.11  Placebo (n=5)  +0.36  (-) Red and/or warm affected limb at baseline  Neridronate (n=8)  -1.21  -1.14  Placebo (n=11)  -0.07  Data on file  Adami G, et al. (2025, Nov 13-15). A precision medicine approach to identifying patients with complex regional pain syndrome type 1 who may benefit from neridronate [Poster presentation]. American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, 24th Annual Pain Medicine Meeting, Austin, TX.    NRS, numeric rating scale. Based on Post Hoc analyses of Phase 3 trials 
 

 20  Neridronate efficacy in CRPS aligns with mechanism of action:Better responses with warm, inflammatory disease stage  Adami G, et al. (2025, Nov 13-15). A precision medicine approach to identifying patients with complex regional pain syndrome type 1 who may benefit from neridronate [Poster presentation]. American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, 24th Annual Pain Medicine Meeting, Austin, TX.    NRS, numeric rating scale.  Post-hoc analyses across three Phase 3 trials1  Baseline swelling and the degree of swelling associated with a bigger effect size on pain at the end of the trial across 3 studies   (adjusted for baseline pain)  Across 3 Phase 3 Trials, Baseline Edema is Associated with a Greater Response  Mild Edema  Mod Edema  Mild Edema  Mod Edema  Severe Edema  No Edema  Yes Edema  -15.40  -28.60  -6.71  -24.30  -37.60  -0.91  -2.11  p=0.068  p=0.004  p=0.576  p=0.003  p=0.005  p=0.096  p=0.001  NERIAS Trial  Day 40  NAIMES Trial  Day 30  KF7013-02 Trial  Week 12  Baseline 
 

 Ongoing pivotal Phase 3 study (CRPS-RISE) builds on successful Abiogen program  Key Eligibility  CRPS-1 diagnosed per clinical Budapest criteria  A known precipitating event (e.g., sprain, fracture, contusion)  CRPS duration ≤6 months  Moderate-severe pain >4 on 11-point NRS (average weekly)  Precision medicine criteria   Positive TPBS  Warm CRPS-1 subtype, defined as:  Moderate to severe edema, or  At least mild edema + obvious redness, or  At least mild edema + increase in temperature  Primary Endpoint  Change from baseline to Week 12 in pain intensity (11-point NRS)  Key Secondary Endpoints:  ≥50% reduction in pain intensity at Week 12  Change from baseline in CRPS Severity Score (CSS) at Week 12  Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) in CRPS-related health at Week 12  Change from baseline in SF-36: Physical Functioning Domain at Week 12  Screening 2 to ≤6 weeks   Clinical program includes:  Registry for long-term outcomes and   Open-label extension to support RCT retention, provide data on a 2nd course of treatment in some patients after Week 12  Randomize 1:1  N= ~135 IV neridronate 100 mg+  Days 1, 4, 7, and 10  Followed by off-treatment follow-up  N= ~135 IV placebo  Days 1, 4, 7, and 10  Followed by off-treatment follow-up  + Neridronate dose adjusted in patients with renal impairment  WEEK 3  WEEK 6  WEEK 9  WEEK 12  Clinic Study Visit  Clinic Study Visit  Clinic Study Visit  PhoneCall  21  NRS: Numerical Rating Scale  ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT07210515  Interim Analysis:  FDA indicated that incorporating an interim analysis with a group sequential design is acceptable; the trial could stop early for efficacy if the prespecified statistical threshold is met. 
 

 Neridronate has been generally well-tolerated across all clinical trials and in post-marketing experience  The tolerability profile of neridronate in CRPS is consistent with the tolerability profiles of other IV bisphosphonates given over a short term;​ however, no meaningful changes in renal function have been observed in neridronate CRPS trials  Acute Phase Reactions (and associated events) were the most commonly reported treatment emergent adverse events in participants receiving neridronate in CRPS clinical trials​   ​Potential risk of developing osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) with high-dose bisphosphonates has not been observed in neridronate CRPS-1 clinical trials1  Post-marketing experience with neridronate in Italy indicates a favorable benefit/risk profile for its approved indications (Paget’s disease, osteogenesis imperfecta, and CRPS-1), with an estimated 600,000+ patients receiving treatment since 20022  ONJ has been very rarely reported in post-marketing data in Italy  Neridronate 2025 Periodic Safety Update Report (Internal).  22  Well-established anticipated tolerability profile 
 

 Neridronate is Differentiated from other BisphosphonatesIndividual bisphosphonates differ meaningfully in their pharmacological properties  Oral bisphosphonates have single-digit bioavailability which is unlikely to be sufficient for CRPS where a short time to a high exposure is felt to be important.  Bisphosphonates have different binding characteristics which may have a meaningful impact on efficacy and safety in CRPS​. For example:1  Neridronate is ~ 100x more potent than etidronate  Neridronate is ~ 100x less potent than zoledronate2  23  Fleisch H 1997 Bisphosphonates in bone disease​; data based on rodent studies and inhibition of bone resorption  The clinical data presented is not based on any head-to-head clinical trials. Differences exist between trial designs, patient characteristics and other factors, and caution should be exercised in drawing any conclusions from a comparison of the data across studies as cross-study comparisons are inherently limited and such data may not be directly comparable.  Iolascon, G.; Moretti, A. The Rationale for Using Neridronate in Musculoskeletal Disorders: From Metabolic Bone Diseases to Musculoskeletal Pain. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022.   Large therapeutic window allows for IV dosing and high exposure without dose limiting adverse events   Specific binding characteristics have been described in literature as unique from other bisphosphonates, leading to enhanced tolerability profile3  The only bisphosphonate supported by multiple positive, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase 3 trials and approved in Italy for CRPS-1  No history of meaningful change in renal function in CRPS clinical trials   Neridronate  Other Bisphosphonates 
 

 24  Market Opportunity and Lifecycle 
 

 Neridronate is a potentially first-in-class therapy for CRPS-1 with a large U.S. market opportunity  25  1  Opportunity to establish standard of care  No FDA-approved pharmacological therapies; current options limited, lack efficacy, costly, and complex  Potentially disease-modifying mechanism  Addresses a population with opioid use disorder present in ~15% of patients in the first year of opioid use.1  2  Well-defined population & call points  ~65,000 newly diagnosed individuals in the U.S. per year1  Short in-office IV course of treatment  We believe the majority of treating physicians are reachable with a focused sales force  3  Strong market research support  Favorable reimbursement environment supported by significant unmet medical need, the absence of FDA-approved pharmacologic therapies for CRPS-1, and market research  ~95% of physicians would prescribe neridronate if approved2  Potential pricing comparable to other rare disease therapies with similarly sized patient populations  Ambros analysis of incident CRPS‑1 patients from the Komodo Healthcare Map claims (n = 189,483).  Primary market research with physicians and CRPS experts conducted by Aquest. 
 

 Initial addressable market considerations  ~65,000 newly diagnosed CRPS-1 patients annually in the U.S.1  Implied annual U.S. addressable population: 30,000+ patients  Estimated % of patients with warm-phase CRPS-1  ~80% to 90%+  first 6 months from onset2  ~70 to 75%  months 6 – 12 from onset2  ×  ~85%  of these patients expected to be TPBS-positive2  3  6  9  12  Months from CRPS-1 symptom onset  Estimated % of patients diagnoses  ~50%  diagnosed within the first 6 months3  ~80%  diagnosed by 12 months, cumulative3  Ambros analysis of incident CRPS‑1 patients from the Komodo Healthcare Map claims (n = 189,483).  Ambros post‑hoc analysis of pooled baseline warm‑phase symptoms across four Grünenthal and two Abiogen studies (n = 189); TPBS positivity per Wüppenhorst N, et al. Clin J Pain 2010 and Wertli MM, et al. PLoS One 2017.  Primary market research with physicians and CRPS experts conducted by Aquest.  26 
 

 Pain specialists are the primary prescribers, supported by a referral network with hand and foot specialists  27  We plan to establish a targeted specialty sales force to reach the majority of U.S. CRPS-1 patients  ~65% of CRPS-1 diagnoses come from four specialties1  Key prescribers concentrated in pain (~6,000 U.S. specialists2) and hand/foot (~12,500 U.S. specialists3)  Prioritized using claims data on high-frequency CRPS-1 diagnosers (Komodo)  Initial focus: high-volume pain clinics, hand/foot specialists, orthopedists (education/awareness), KOLs  Ambros analysis of incident CRPS‑1 patients from the Komodo Healthcare Map claims (n = 189,483); diagnosing-specialty distribution.  2026 AMA Physician Professional Data; U.S. Physician Workforce Data Dashboard. Excludes non-practicing pain physicians.  2024 Occupational Outlook Handbook and Patel R et al. Where Are the Hand Surgeons? J Hand Surg Glob Online. 2025 Dec 5. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2025.100898. 
 

 28  IP, regulatory exclusivity, CMC readiness, and Abiogen license 
 

 Neridronate protected through IP and high barrier to entry  U.S. market exclusivity  Methods for patient selection patent granted (exp. 2045)  7-year Orphan exclusivity; potential 6-month pediatric exclusivity  Limitations of other bisphosphonates  Differentiated from other branded/generic bisphosphonates  IV formulation addresses limited bioavailability of oral bisphosphonates  Efficacy and safety of other injectable bisphosphonates have not been established in CRPS-1 trials  Existing and future treatment options  Expensive procedures such as sympathetic nerve blocks, sympathectomies, and spinal cord stimulation are used in patients despite limited efficacy  Opioids may help manage acute pain to limited extent, but tolerance, long-term toxicity, and addiction pose serious risks  Lack of late-stage (Phase 2 or beyond) CRPS assets in the clinic  29 
 

 30  Abiogen License Agreement  Owns >5% of Ambros post merger closure  Manages all manufacturing of commercial product  Established manufacturing capabilities that support their owned products, and partnered products   >1 million square foot manufacturing plant that meets the strict Good Manufacturing Practice rules set by the EMA  Clinical drug product (sterile IV) manufactured by Alcami; supply in place through CRPS-RISE topline  Abiogen  Exclusive, sublicensable license to develop and commercialize neridronate in the U.S., Canada and Mexico (along with options to expand into other territories)  Leads U.S. clinical development, FDA regulatory process and commercialization  Ambros pays Abiogen a transfer price equal to the cost of goods plus a low double-digit markup and a separate mid-single-digit royalty on aggregate annual net sales; no milestones   Typical partnership governance and committees in place with Abiogen  Ambros 
 

 31  Pro forma financial position, cash runway, key milestones and expected newsflow 
 

 Strong Capital Position  ~$103.2M in cash, cash equivalents, and short-term investments as of 6/30/20261  FDA engagement on incorporating interim analysis in CRPS-RISE  First Patient Enrolled in Pivotal CRPS-RISE Trial (June 2026)  2028  Pivotal CRPS-RISE Topline Data Readout  Neridronate NDA Submission  1H26  2H26  + ~6 months  Unaudited and prepared only by the Company's management, subject to change as of June 30, 2026.  32  Key Value-Inflection Milestones Through 2028  4Q26  Expected close of pending reverse merger with Werewolf Therapeutics 
 

 Appendix  33 
 

 Abiogen NAIMES Phase 3 study with neridronate administered IM   D: IM study treatment dosed. IM: Intramuscular.  Varenna M et al. Intramuscular neridronate for the treatment of complex regional pain syndrome type 1: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. 2021 Jun 11;13:1759720X211014020.  Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in CRPS-1 (n=78)  TPBS confirmed CRPS-1 with symptoms <4 months  25 mg neridronate (n=41) or placebo (n=37) on days 1-16*  Primary endpoint of pain intensity assessed by visual analog scale (VAS, range 0-100mm) at day 30  Neridronate significantly reduced VAS pain intensity score vs. placebo (p=0.0003)  Significant improvements observed across secondary endpoints of pain and quality of life (McGill Pain Questionnaire)  Significant improvements in edema (p=0.03), allodynia (p=0.0004), hyperalgesia (p=0.0023), pain at motion (p=0.0009) vs. placebo  Double-blind  34 
 

 Utility of triple-phase bone scan (TPBS) as a “precision medicine” tool in CRPS-1  TPBS is an imaging procedure that uses a radiolabeled bisphosphonate (BP) and specialized camera to assess bone involvement  BPs bind to hydroxyapatite, a calcium mineral exposed during the warm phase of CRPS-11  Qualitative comparison vs. patient’s own unaffected limb  Increased radiolabeled BP uptake (positive TPBS reading) indicates high bone turnover and exposed bone tissue2  increases likelihood of response to neridronate by confirming BP penetrance at site of injury1  Positive TPBS readings have been shown to correlate with CRPS-1 disease duration and are typically seen within the first 5-6 months of symptoms (“warm” phase)3  “Cold” CRPS-1 usually correlates with negative TPBS readings, indicating decreased BP uptake3  35  ​Wong KK, Piert M. "Dynamic bone imaging with 99mTc-labeled diphosphonates and 18F-NaF: mechanisms and applications." J Nucl Med. 2013;54(4):590-599. PMID 23482667​  Varenna M, Crotti C. Bisphosphonates in the treatment of complex regional pain syndrome: is bone the main player at early stage of the disease? Rheumatol Int 2018;38(11):1959-1962. Varenna M. Bisphosphonates beyond their anti-osteoclastic properties. The lesson of complex regional pain syndrome. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2014;53(6):965-967.​  Wüppenhorst N, et al. Sensitivity and specificity of 3‑phase bone scintigraphy in the diagnosis of CRPS of the upper extremity. Clin J Pain 2010; Wertli MM, et al. Usefulness of bone scintigraphy for the diagnosis of CRPS 1: a systematic review and Bayesian meta‑analysis. PLoS One 2017.​ 
 

 Abiogen IV NERIAS Study Demonstrated Responses Similar Whether Treated Initially or in the Cross-Over Phase, After Day 40 + Washout Period  Draft - Confidentail - Preliminary for Discussion  36  Placebo in double-blind phase  Neridronate in cross over phase following placebo in double-blind phase  Neridronate in double- blind phase  Days 

 

Keep reading