[10-Q] HYPERION DEFI, INC. Quarterly Earnings Report
Rhea-AI Filing Summary
Hyperion DeFi, Inc. reported a sharp turnaround in Q3 2025 as it pivoted to a digital‑asset treasury strategy centered on HYPE tokens. Net income was $6.6 million for the quarter, compared with a loss a year ago, driven by realized and unrealized gains on HYPE and a gain on extinguishment of liabilities. Revenue reached $302,506 from native staking and validator commissions. Cash was $8.2 million, total assets $82.8 million, and stockholders’ equity improved to $70.8 million.
The company raised capital through an ATM and a private placement, including $50.0 million of Series A Preferred Stock with accompanying warrants, and expanded authorized shares. It began acquiring and staking HYPE in July, ending the quarter with HYPE digital assets of $37.95 million and digital intangible assets (primarily HiHYPE) of $35.02 million, offset by a $6.29 million impairment. The Avenue loan was amended to extend maturity to July 1, 2028, reduce the rate to 8% (half cash/half PIK), and add warrants. Common shares outstanding were 7,162,659 as of September 30, 2025; 8,097,659 as of November 10, 2025.
Positive
- None.
Negative
- None.
Insights
Profit swung positive on HYPE-related gains; balance sheet now HYPE-heavy.
Hyperion DeFi generated Q3 profit of
Risk now concentrates in digital assets: HYPE carried at
Financing included
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, DC 20549
FORM
For the quarterly period ended:
OR
For the transition period from to
COMMISSION FILE NUMBER:
(Exact name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
Delaware |
| |
(State or Other Jurisdiction of |
| (I.R.S. Employer |
|
|
|
| ||
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) |
| (Zip Code) |
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class |
| Trading Symbol(s) |
| Name of each exchange on which registered |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files).
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer | ☐ | Accelerated filer | ☐ |
| | | |
☒ | Smaller reporting company | ||
| | | |
| | Emerging growth company |
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any news or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes
The number of outstanding shares of the registrant’s common stock was
Table of Contents
EXPLANATORY NOTE
On January 31, 2025, Hyperion DeFi, Inc. (the “Company”) effected a reverse stock split of its common stock at a ratio of 1-for-80 (the “Reverse Split”). Upon the effectiveness of the Reverse Split, every 80 issued shares of common stock were reclassified and combined into one share of common stock. In addition, the number of shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of the Company’s equity awards, convertible securities and warrants was proportionally decreased, and the corresponding conversion price or exercise price was proportionally increased. No fractional shares were issued as a result of the Reverse Split. Stockholders who would otherwise have been entitled to receive a fractional share received a cash payment in lieu of such fractional share. Accordingly, all share and per share amounts for all periods presented in these condensed financial statements and notes thereto have been adjusted retroactively, where applicable, to reflect the Reverse Split and adjustment of the conversion price or exercise price of each outstanding equity award, convertible security and warrant as if the transaction had occurred as of the beginning of the earliest period presented.
Table of Contents
HYPERION DEFI, INC.
FORM 10-Q
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2025
TABLE OF CONTENTS
| ||
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION | | |
| | |
Item 1. Financial Statements. | 2 | |
| | |
Condensed Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2025 (Unaudited) and December 31, 2024 | 2 | |
| | |
Unaudited Condensed Statements of Operations for the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2025 and 2024 | 3 | |
| | |
Unaudited Condensed Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit) for the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2025 | 4 | |
| | |
Unaudited Condensed Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit) for the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2024 | 5 | |
| | |
Unaudited Condensed Statements of Cash Flows for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2025 and 2024 | 6 | |
| | |
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Financial Statements | 8 | |
| | |
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. | 24 | |
| | |
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk. | 36 | |
| | |
Item 4. Controls and Procedures. | 36 | |
| | |
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION | | |
| | |
Item 1. Legal Proceedings. | 37 | |
| | |
Item 1A. Risk Factors. | 37 | |
| | |
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds. | 55 | |
| | |
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities. | 55 | |
| | |
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures. | 55 | |
| | |
Item 5. Other Information. | 55 | |
| | |
Item 6. Exhibits. | 56 | |
| | |
SIGNATURES | 58 | |
1
Table of Contents
PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements.
HYPERION DEFI, INC.
Condensed Balance Sheets
| | | | | | |
|
| September 30, |
| December 31, | ||
|
| 2025 |
| 2024 | ||
|
| (unaudited) | | | | |
Assets |
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
Current Assets |
| |
|
| |
|
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | | | $ | |
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | | | | | | |
Total Current Assets | |
| | |
| |
| |
| | |
| |
HYPE - digital assets | | | | | | — |
Digital intangible assets | | | | | | — |
Operating lease right-of-use asset | | | | | | |
Other assets | |
| | |
| |
Total Assets | | $ | | | $ | |
| |
| | |
|
|
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit) | |
| | |
|
|
| |
| | |
|
|
Current Liabilities: | |
| | |
|
|
Accounts payable | | $ | | | $ | |
Accrued former licensor obligations | | | — | | | |
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities | |
| | |
| |
Operating lease liabilities - current portion | | | | | | |
Notes payable - current portion, net of debt discount of $ | | | — | | | |
Convertible notes payable - current portion, net of debt discount of $ | | | — | | | |
Total Current Liabilities | | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Notes payable - non-current portion, net of debt discount of $ | | | | | | — |
Operating lease liabilities - non-current portion | | | | | | |
Total Liabilities | | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Commitments and contingencies (Note 9) | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit): | |
|
| |
|
|
Preferred stock, $ | |
| | |
| — |
Common stock, $ | |
| | | | |
Additional paid-in capital | |
| | | | |
Accumulated deficit | |
| ( | | | ( |
Total Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit) | | | | | | ( |
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit) | | $ | | | $ | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed financial statements.
2
Table of Contents
HYPERION DEFI, INC.
Condensed Statements of Operations
(unaudited)
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the Three Months Ended | | For the Nine Months Ended | ||||||||
| | September 30, | | September 30, | ||||||||
|
| 2025 |
| 2024 |
| 2025 |
| 2024 | ||||
Revenue | | $ | | | | | | $ | | | $ | |
Cost of revenue | | | — | | | ( | | | ( | | | ( |
Gross Profit (Loss) | | | | | | ( | | | | | | ( |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating (Income) Expenses: |
| | |
| | | | | | |
| |
Research and development | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Selling, general and administrative | |
| | |
| | | | | | | |
Realized gains - digital assets | | | ( | | | — | | | ( | | | — |
Unrealized gains - digital assets | | | ( | | | — | | | ( | | | — |
Impairment loss - digital intangible assets | | | | | | — | | | | | | — |
Reacquisition of license rights | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | |
Net Operating (Income) Expenses | |
| ( | |
| | | | | | | |
Income (Loss) From Operations | |
| | |
| ( | | | ( | | | ( |
| |
| | |
| | | | | | | |
Other Income (Expense): | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Other income (expense), net | | | | | | | | | | | | ( |
Gain on extinguishment of liability | | | | | | — | | | | | | — |
Change in fair value of equity consideration payable | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | |
Interest expense | | | ( | |
| ( | | | ( | | | ( |
Interest income | |
| | |
| | | | | | | |
Total Other Income (Expense), Net | |
| | |
| ( | | | | | | ( |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net Income (Loss) | | | | | | ( | | | ( | | | ( |
Dividend to preferred stockholders | | | ( | | | — | | | ( | | | — |
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Participating Securities | | $ | | | $ | ( | | $ | ( | | $ | ( |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net Income (Loss) per Common Share | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Basic | | $ | | | $ | ( | | $ | ( | | $ | ( |
Diluted | | $ | | | $ | ( | | $ | ( | | $ | ( |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Weighted Average Number of Common Shares Outstanding: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Basic | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Diluted | |
| | |
| | | | | | | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed financial statements.
3
Table of Contents
HYPERION DEFI, INC.
Condensed Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)
For the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2025
(unaudited)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | Additional | | | | | Total | ||
| | Preferred Stock | | Common Stock | | Paid-In | | Accumulated | | Stockholders’ | |||||||||
|
| Shares |
| Amount |
| Shares |
| Amount |
| Capital |
| Deficit |
| Equity (Deficit) | |||||
Balance - January 1, 2025 |
| — | | $ | — | | | | $ | | | $ | | | $ | ( | | $ | ( |
Issuance of common stock in At the Market offering [1] |
| — | |
| — | | | | | | |
| | |
| — | |
| |
Induced exercise of stock warrants [2] | | — | | | — | | | | | | | | | | | — | | | |
Reverse stock split settlement of fractional shares | | — | | | — | | ( | | | — | | | ( | | | — | | | ( |
Stock-based compensation |
| — | |
| — | | — | | | — | |
| | |
| — | |
| |
Net loss | | — | | | — | | — | | | — | | | — | | | ( | | | ( |
Balance - March 31, 2025 | | — | | | — | | | | | | | | | | | ( | | | ( |
Issuance of preferred stock and warrants in private placement [3] | | | | | | | — | | | — | | | | | | — | | | |
Issuance of common stock in At the Market offering [4] | | — | | | — | | | | | | | | | | | — | | | |
Issuance of common stock from exercise of warrants | | — | | | — | | | | | | | | | | | — | | | |
Issuance of common stock from the delivery of vested restricted stock units | | — | | | — | | | | | | | | ( | | | — | | | — |
Issuance of common stock from the partial conversion of note payable | | — | | | — | | | | | | | | | | | — | | | |
Warrants issued in consideration for debt modification | | — | | | — | | — | | | — | | | | | | — | | | |
Stock-based compensation | | — | | | — | | — | | | — | | | | | | — | | | |
Net loss | | — | | | — | | — | | | — | | | — | | | ( | | | ( |
Preferred stock dividend | | — | | | — | | — | | | — | | | ( | | | — | | | ( |
Balance - June 30, 2025 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ( | | | |
Issuance of common stock in At the Market offering [5] | | — | | | — | | | | | | | | | | | — | | | |
Issuance of common stock from exercise of warrants [6] | | — | | | — | | | | | | | | | | | — | | | |
Issuance of common stock from the delivery of vested restricted stock units | | — | | | — | | | | | | | | ( | | | — | | | — |
Stock-based compensation | | — | | | — | | — | | | — | | | | | | — | | | |
Net income | | — | | | — | | — | | | — | | | — | | | | | | |
Preferred stock dividend | | — | | | — | | — | | | — | | | ( | | | — | | | ( |
Balance - September 30, 2025 |
| | | $ | | | | | $ | | | $ | | | $ | ( | | $ | |
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed financial statements.
4
Table of Contents
HYPERION DEFI, INC.
Condensed Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)
For the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2024
(unaudited)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | Additional | | | | | Total | ||
| | Preferred Stock | | Common Stock | | Paid-In | | Accumulated | | Stockholders’ | |||||||||
|
| Shares |
| Amount |
| Shares |
| Amount |
| Capital |
| Deficit |
| Equity (Deficit) | |||||
Balance - January 1, 2024 | | — | | $ | — | | | | $ | | | $ | | | $ | ( | | $ | |
Issuance of common stock in At the Market offering [7] | | — | | | — | | | |
| | |
| | |
| — | |
| |
Cashless exercise of stock options | | | | | | | — | |
| — | |
| — | |
| — | |
| — |
Stock-based compensation | | — | | | — | | — | | | — | | | | | | — | | | |
Issuance of common stock related to vested restricted stock units | | | | | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — |
Net loss | | — | | | — | | — | |
| — | |
| — | |
| ( | |
| ( |
Balance - March 31, 2024 | | — | | | — | | | |
| | |
| | |
| ( | |
| |
Issuance of common stock in registered direct offering [8] | | — | | | — | | | | | | | | | | | — | | | |
Issuance of common stock as consideration for licensing agreement [9] | | — | | | — | | | |
| | |
| | |
| — | |
| |
Issuance of common stock as consideration for reacquisition of licensing agreement [10] | | — | | | — | | | |
| | |
| | |
| — | |
| |
Issuance of common stock in At the Market offering [11] | | — | | | — | | | | | | | | | | | — | | | |
Stock-based compensation | | — | | | — | | — | | | — | | | | | | — | | | |
Net loss | | — | | | — | | — | | | — | | | — | | | ( | | | ( |
Balance - June 30, 2024 | | — | | | — | | | | | | | | | | | ( | | | ( |
Issuance of common stock and warrants in offerings [12] | | — | | | — | | | | | | | | | | | — | | | |
Warrant modification - incremental value [13] | | — | | | — | | — | | | — | | | | | | — | | | |
Warrant modification - in issuance costs for registered direct offering [14] | | — | | | — | | — | | | — | | | ( | | | — | | | ( |
Issuance of common stock in At the Market offering [15] | | — | | | — | | | | | | | | | | | — | | | |
Stock-based compensation | | — | | | — | | — | | | — | | | | | | — | | | |
Net loss | | — | | | — | | — | | | — | | | — | | | ( | | | ( |
Balance – September 30, 2024 | | — | | $ | — | | | | $ | | | $ | | | $ | ( | | $ | |
[7]
[8]
[9]
[10]
[11]
[12]
[13]
[14]
[15]
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed financial statements.
5
Table of Contents
HYPERION DEFI, INC.
Condensed Statements of Cash Flows
(unaudited)
| | | | | | |
| | For the Nine Months Ended | ||||
| | September 30, | ||||
|
| 2025 |
| 2024 | ||
Cash Flows From Operating Activities |
| |
|
| |
|
Net loss | | $ | ( | | $ | ( |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities: | |
| | |
| |
Stock-based compensation | | | | | | |
Change in fair value of equity consideration payable | |
| — | |
| ( |
Depreciation of property and equipment | | | — | | | |
Amortization of debt discount | | | | | | |
Write-off of property and equipment | | | — | | | |
Write-down of inventories to net realizable value | | | — | | | |
Reacquisition of license rights | |
| — | |
| |
Non-cash lease expense | | | | | | |
Gain on extinguishment of liabilities | | | ( | | | — |
Unrealized gain on HYPE digital assets | | | ( | | | — |
Non-cash realized gain on HYPE digital assets | | | ( | | | — |
Impairment loss - digital intangible assets | | | | | | — |
HYPE staking income | | | ( | | | — |
Interest expense added to note principal | | | | | | — |
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: | | | | | | |
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | |
| ( | |
| |
License fee and expense reimbursement receivables | | | — | | | ( |
Deferred clinical supply costs | |
| — | |
| |
Inventories | |
| — | | | ( |
Security and equipment deposits | | | ( | | | |
Accounts payable | | | ( | | | ( |
Accrued compensation | | | — | | | ( |
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities | | | | | | ( |
Lease liabilities | | | ( | | | ( |
Net Cash Used In Operating Activities | |
| ( | | | ( |
| |
| | | | |
Cash Flows From Investing Activities | | | | | | |
Purchase of property and equipment | | | — | | | ( |
Purchase of productive digital assets | | | ( | | | — |
Net Cash Used In Investing Activities | | | ( | | | ( |
| | | | | | |
Cash Flows From Financing Activities | |
| | |
| |
Proceeds from sale of common stock and warrants in direct offering | | | — | | | |
Payment of direct offering costs | | | — | | | ( |
Proceeds from sale of preferred stock and warrants in private placement | |
| | |
| — |
Payment of private placement issuance costs | | | ( | | | — |
Proceeds from sale of common stock in At the Market offering | | | | | | |
Payment of issuance costs for At the Market offering | | | ( | | | ( |
Proceeds from induced exercise of stock warrants | | | | | | — |
Proceeds from exercise of stock warrants | |
| | |
| — |
Payment of cash issuance costs for induced exercise of stock warrants | | | ( | | | — |
Reverse stock split settlement of fractional shares | | | ( | | | — |
Payment of issuance costs for debt modification | | | ( | | | — |
Repayments of notes payable | | | ( | | | ( |
Payment of preferred dividend | | | ( | | | — |
Net Cash Provided By Financing Activities | |
| | |
| |
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents | |
| | |
| ( |
Cash and Cash Equivalents - Beginning of Period | | | | |
| |
Cash and Cash Equivalents - End of Period | | $ | | | $ | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed financial statements.
6
Table of Contents
HYPERION DEFI, INC.
Condensed Statements of Cash Flows, continued
(unaudited)
| | | | | | |
| | For the Nine Months Ended | ||||
| | September 30, | ||||
|
| 2025 |
| 2024 | ||
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information: | | | | | | |
Cash paid during the period for: | | | | | | |
Interest | | $ | | | $ | |
Taxes | | $ | — | | $ | — |
| | | | | | |
Supplemental Disclosure of Non-Cash Investing and Financing Activities | | | | | | |
Deposits of HYPE into liquid staking activities | | $ | | | $ | — |
Purchase of insurance policy financed by note payable | | $ | — | | $ | |
Accrual for intangible asset milestone obligation | | $ | — | | $ | |
Dividend payable | | $ | | | $ | — |
Reclassification of deferred clinical supply costs to inventories | | $ | — | | $ | |
Modification date carrying value of extinguished Avenue Loan | | $ | | | $ | — |
Modification date fair value of modified Avenue Loan | | $ | | | $ | — |
Warrants issued for debt modification | | $ | | | $ | — |
Warrant modification and additional warrants - incremental value | | $ | | | $ | |
Conversion of Avenue Loan to common stock | | $ | | | $ | — |
Common stock issued in consideration for licensing agreement | | $ | — | | $ | |
Common stock issued in consideration for reacquisition of licensing agreement | | $ | — | | $ | |
Issuance of common stock related to vested restricted stock units | | $ | | | $ | — |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed financial statements.
7
Table of Contents
HYPERION DEFI, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
Note 1 – Business Organization, Nature of Operations and Basis of Presentation
Hyperion DeFi, Inc. (“Hyperion DeFi” or the “Company”), formerly known as Eyenovia, Inc., is the first U.S. publicly listed company building a long-term strategic treasury of HYPE. Hyperion DeFi is working to provide its shareholders with simplified exposure to the Hyperliquid ecosystem. At the same time, the Company continues to execute on its planned completion of the development and registration of its Optejet ophthalmic liquid delivery device.
HYPE is the native token of Hyperliquid, a decentralized Layer-1 blockchain designed for high-frequency, transparent trading. Hyperliquid supports fully on-chain perpetual futures and spot order books, operating with block times of approximately 70 milliseconds. Hyperion DeFi’s strategy is designed to allow shareholders to benefit from a gradually compounding exposure to HYPE, both from its native staking yield and additional revenues generated from its unique on-chain utility.
Hyperion DeFi is also completing development of its proprietary Optejet User Filled Device, designed to work with a variety of topical ophthalmic liquids, including artificial tears and lens rewetting products. The Optejet is especially useful in chronic front-of-the-eye diseases due to its ease of use, enhanced safety and tolerability.
Beginning in July 2025, the Company used the proceeds from its capital raising activities to acquire and deploy HYPE in various revenue-generating activities, which includes native staking, liquid staking and its proprietary HYPE Asset Use Service product.
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited condensed financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 8 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and disclosures required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, such statements include all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring items) which are considered necessary for a fair presentation of the condensed financial statements of the Company as of September 30, 2025 and for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024. The results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2025 are not necessarily indicative of the operating results for the full year ending December 31, 2025 or any other period. These unaudited condensed financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and related disclosures of the Company as of December 31, 2024 and for the year then ended, which were included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on April 15, 2025 (the “2024 Form 10-K”), as amended by Amendment No. 1, filed with the SEC on April 30, 2025 (the “2024 Form 10-K Amendment”).
On January 31, 2025, the Company effected a reverse stock split of its common stock at a ratio of 1-for-80 (the “Reverse Split”). Upon the effectiveness of the Reverse Split, every 80 issued shares of common stock were reclassified and combined into one share of common stock. In addition, the number of shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of the Company’s equity awards, convertible securities and warrants was proportionally decreased, and the corresponding conversion price or exercise price was proportionally increased. No fractional shares were issued as a result of the Reverse Split. Stockholders who would otherwise have been entitled to receive a fractional share received a cash payment in lieu of such fractional share. Accordingly, all share and per share amounts for all periods presented in these condensed financial statements and notes thereto have been adjusted retroactively, where applicable, to reflect the Reverse Split and adjustment of the conversion price or exercise price of each outstanding equity award, convertible security and warrant as if the transaction had occurred as of the beginning of the earliest period presented.
8
Table of Contents
HYPERION DEFI, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
Note 2 – Management’s Liquidity Plans
The Company’s primary source of liquidity has historically been cash generated from equity offerings and debt, along with periodic revenue generated from licensing agreements. Under ASC Subtopic 205-40, Presentation of Financial Statements—Going Concern, the Company has the responsibility to evaluate whether conditions and/or events raise substantial doubt about its ability to meet future financial obligations as they become due within one year after the date that these financial statements are issued. Since the Company’s inception, it has had a history of recurring net losses from operations, recurring use of cash in operating activities and working capital deficits.
As disclosed in the Company’s December 31, 2024 Form 10-K, there was substantial doubt about the ability of the Company to continue as a going concern for at least one year from the date the financial statements were issued. This was based on a significant working capital deficiency, significant historical losses and the need to raise additional funds to meet the Company’s obligations and sustain its operations. During the nine months ended September 30, 2025, the Company raised significant capital through both an ATM offering and a private placement of Series A preferred stock (see Note 10 – Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit). A significant amount of the proceeds generated from these capital raises was used to purchase digital assets in connection with the launch of the Company’s new long-term strategic treasury of HYPE. The Company also extended the maturity date of its Loan and Security Agreement (see Note 8 – Notes Payable and Convertible Notes Payable). These actions have alleviated the substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern that existed at the time the Company filed its December 31, 2024 Form 10-K.
As of September 30, 2025, the Company had unrestricted cash and cash equivalents of approximately $
The Company’s financial condition is substantially dependent on the market price and liquidity of HYPE tokens, which are subject to extreme volatility and limited trading venues. Substantially all of the Company’s treasury assets are concentrated in HYPE tokens, the native cryptocurrency of the Hyperliquid protocol. HYPE tokens have experienced significant price volatility, and the Company’s financial results and carrying value of its digital assets will fluctuate materially based on HYPE token price movements. The Company depends on the continued success and adoption of the Hyperliquid protocol for the value of its treasury holdings.
The Company plans to continue to pursue additional capital through its at-the-market offering programs in the future, however, such funding may not be available on terms acceptable to the Company or at all. Although Management believes that such capital sources will continue to be available, there can be no assurances that financing will be available to the Company when needed, or if available, on terms acceptable to the Company. If the Company is unable to obtain adequate financing on terms that are satisfactory to the Company, when the Company requires it, the Company’s ability to continue to grow or support the business and to respond to business challenges could be significantly limited, which may adversely affect the Company’s business plans.
Note 3 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
The Company disclosed its significant accounting policies in Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies included in the 2024 Form 10-K. There have been no material changes to the Company’s significant accounting policies during the nine months ended September 30, 2025, except as disclosed below.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
The Company considers all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents in the financial statements. The Company has cash deposits in financial institutions that, at times, may be in excess of Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) insurance limits. The Company has not experienced losses in such accounts and periodically evaluates the creditworthiness of its financial institutions. As of September 30, 2025, the Company had cash and cash equivalent balances in excess of FDIC insurance limits of $
9
Table of Contents
HYPERION DEFI, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
Digital Assets
The Company’s digital assets primarily include HYPE (the Hyperliquid network’s utility token) and HiHYPE (a liquid staking token). HYPE is accounted for in accordance with ASC 350-60, Intangibles—Goodwill and Other—Crypto Assets (“ASC 350-60”). HiHYPE is treated as an intangible asset in accordance with ASC 350-30, Intangibles—Goodwill and Other—General Intangibles Other Than Goodwill (“ASC 350-30”) as the HiHYPE represents a claim on HYPE and therefore, does not meet the scoping requirements of ASC 350-60.
HYPE digital assets are initially recorded at cost and then subsequently remeasured at fair value as of the balance sheet date with changes in fair value recognized as unrealized gains or losses in operating income (expense). Upon derecognition of HYPE, the Company recognizes realized gains or losses in operating income (expense), based upon the fair value of HYPE on the date of derecognition.
HiHYPE tokens and Other Digital Assets are intangible assets with indefinite lives; they are not amortized but are subject to impairment. HiHYPE is recorded at acquisition cost, reflecting the fair value of HYPE deposited in the liquid staking pool and tracked by lot. These assets are presented as digital intangible assets in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at cost, net of any recognized impairments. The Company tests digital intangible assets for impairment quarterly and more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that it is more likely than not that the asset is impaired. The test for impairment consists of a comparison of the fair value of the digital intangible assets with their carrying amounts. Should market prices fall below carrying value, the resulting difference is recognized as an impairment charge. Such impairment charges are presented as impairment of digital intangible assets in operating income (expense).
The Company uses the specific identification method to track the cost basis of all digital intangible assets.
Fair Value Measurement
The Company determines fair value measurements for digital assets in accordance with ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements (“ASC 820”), which defines fair value as the exit price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an ordinary transaction between market participants. ASC 820 establishes a framework for valuation techniques, prioritized by reliability, according to the following tiers:
Level 1 - Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities
Level 2 - Quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for similar or identical assets and liabilities in markets that are not active; valuation models in which all significant inputs are derived from observable market data
Level 3 - Unobservable valuation model inputs for assets and liabilities such as discounted cash flow models or similar techniques; inputs for fair value instruments; includes assumptions and may require significant judgment and estimation by management
The Company’s digital assets are subject to fair value measurements on a recurring basis and the level of inputs used for such measurements were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| September 30, 2025 | |||||||||||||
| | | | | Fair Value | ||||||||||
|
| Carrying Value |
| Level 1 |
| Level 2 |
| Level 3 |
| Total | |||||
Assets: |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
HYPE digital assets | | $ | — | | $ | | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | |
Total assets | | $ | — | | $ | | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | |
HYPE digital assets are measured at fair value on a recurring basis using quoted prices in its principal market (Level 1 inputs). The Company has designated a principal market based on the market the Company has access to that has the greatest volume and level of orderly transactions for HYPE. The Company reassesses its principal market when facts and circumstances change, including but not limited to when new markets become accessible, or the volume/activity in the current principal market declines.
10
Table of Contents
HYPERION DEFI, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
Revenue Recognition
The Company jointly operates a validator node on the Hyperliquid blockchain network and earns HYPE as rewards and commission income for validating transactions and maintaining network security. These activities include both self-staking (using the Company’s own tokens) and providing validation services to third-party delegators. The provision of services related to transaction validation on the Hyperliquid blockchain network (through both staking rewards and commission income) is an output of the Company’s ordinary activities.
The Company recognizes revenue from native staking in accordance with ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“ASC 606”) by following the five steps -- identify the contract, identify the performance obligation, determine the transaction price, allocate the transaction price to the performance obligation and determine when to recognize revenue. Revenue is recognized upon transfer of control of promised products or services (i.e., performance obligations) to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the Company expects to be entitled in exchange for promised goods or services.
The Company earns commission income in the form of HYPE from validator operations and staking rewards in the form of HYPE from self-staking. A contract with enforceable rights and obligations exists when the Company stakes its tokens to the validator and starts solving blocks on the Hyperliquid blockchain, which is the customer by analogy. The contract term is the length of each staking epoch, which is approximately 90 minutes. Staking rewards and commission income are recognized as revenue when the Company satisfies its performance obligations (i.e., successfully validates blocks or transactions as determined by the protocol) ratably over the contract term. The HYPE earned are noncash consideration and therefore measured at fair value at the inception of each contract.
Because the Company does not unilaterally control the validator, the Company is not the principal to the validation service. As such, the Company presents staking rewards and commission income as revenue on a net basis, reflecting only the portion of protocol rewards and commission to which it is entitled.
Income Tax
On July 4, 2025, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (“OBBBA”) was signed into law, which makes permanent many of the tax provisions enacted in 2017 as part of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act that were set to expire at the end of 2025. In addition, OBBBA makes changes to certain U.S. corporate tax provisions, but many are generally not effective until 2026. While further evaluation is ongoing, the new tax legislation is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.
Reclassifications
Certain prior period balances have been reclassified in order to conform to the current period presentation. These reclassifications have no effect on previously reported results of operations or loss per share.
Note 4 - Net Income (Loss) Per Share of Common Stock
The Company’s net income (loss) per share is calculated using the two-class method in accordance with ASC Topic 260, Earnings Per Share. The two-class method allocates earnings between common stockholders and holders of participating securities. The Company’s Series A Preferred Stock (see Note 10 - Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit) – Securities Purchase Agreement) are deemed to be participating securities due to their rights to participate in dividends with common stock. However, the two-class method has no impact on the calculation of loss per share during periods when the Company has a net loss, because the holders of participating securities are not required to absorb losses.
Basic net income (loss) per common share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period, Diluted net income (loss) per common share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding, plus the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if the common share equivalents had been issued (computed using the treasury stock or if converted method), if dilutive. There were
11
Table of Contents
HYPERION DEFI, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
The following table presents the computation of basic and diluted net income (loss) per common share:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| For the Three Months Ended | | For the Nine Months Ended | ||||||||
| | September 30, | | September 30, | ||||||||
|
| 2025 |
| 2024 |
| 2025 |
| 2024 | ||||
Numerator: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income (loss) attributable to participating securities | | $ | | | $ | ( | | $ | ( | | $ | ( |
Less: Net income attributable to preferred shareholders | | | ( | | | — | | | — | | | — |
Net income (loss) available to common shareholders | | $ | | | $ | ( | | $ | ( | | $ | ( |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Denominator (weighted average quantities): | |
| | |
| | | | | | | |
Common shares issued | |
| | |
| | | | | | | |
Add: Vested unissued restricted stock units | |
| | |
| | | | | | | |
Denominator for basic net income (loss) per share | |
| | |
| | | | | | | |
Effect of dilutive securities: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Assumed exercise of warrants, treasury stock method | | | | | | — | | | — | | | — |
Assumed vesting of restricted stock units | | | | | | — | | | — | | | — |
Denominator for diluted net income (loss) per share | |
| | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net Income (Loss) Per Share | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Basic | | $ | | | $ | ( | | $ | ( | | $ | ( |
Diluted | | $ | | | $ | ( | | $ | ( | | $ | ( |
The following securities are excluded from the calculation of weighted average diluted shares of common stock for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024, because their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive:
| | | | | | | | |
| | For the Three Months Ended | | For the Nine Months Ended | ||||
| | September 30, | | September 30, | ||||
|
| 2025 |
| 2024 |
| 2025 |
| 2024 |
Options |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Warrants |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Unvested RSU | | | | | | | | |
Series A Convertible Preferred |
| — |
| — |
| |
| — |
Convertible debt | | — | | | | — | | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
Note 5 – Prepaid Expenses and Other Current Assets
Prepaid expenses and other current assets consisted of the following:
| | | | | | |
|
| September 30, |
| December 31, | ||
|
| 2025 |
| 2024 | ||
Prepaid insurance expenses | | $ | | | $ | |
Payroll tax receivable | | | | | | |
Prepaid general and administrative expenses | | | | | | |
Other prepaid expenses | | | | | | |
Total prepaid expenses and other current assets | | $ | | | $ | |
12
Table of Contents
HYPERION DEFI, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
Note 6 – Digital Assets
The following table represents a reconciliation of the Company’s assets and (liabilities) related to its digital assets:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| Digital |
| | |
| | | |
| | HYPE Digital | | Intangible | | Covered Call | | | | |||
| | Assets | | Assets | | Option (1) | | Total | ||||
Balance, December 31, 2024 | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | — |
Purchases of HYPE through June 30, 2025 | |
| | |
| — | |
| — | |
| |
Balance, June 30, 2025 | |
| | |
| — | |
| — | |
| |
Proceeds from sale of covered call option | |
| — | |
| — | |
| ( | |
| ( |
Purchases | |
| | |
| | |
| — | |
| |
Deposits of HYPE into liquid staking activities | |
| ( | |
| | |
| — | |
| — |
Receipt and accrual of HYPE from native staking activities | |
| | |
| — | |
| — | |
| |
Unrealized gains | |
| | |
| — | |
| | |
| |
Realized gains | |
| | |
| — | |
| — | |
| |
Impairment | |
| — | |
| ( | |
| — | |
| ( |
Balance, September 30, 2025(2) | | $ | | | $ | | | $ | ( | | $ | |
(1) | The liability for the Company’s covered call option is included in accrued expenses in the accompanying balance sheet. |
(2) | The balance as of September 30, 2025 represents fair value for the HYPE digital assets and the covered call option liability, and represents the carrying value for the digital intangible assets. |
HYPE Digital Assets
The following table sets forth the units held, cost basis, and fair value of HYPE digital assets held, as shown on the balance sheet as of September 30, 2025:
| | | | | | | | |
|
| Units |
| Cost Basis |
| Fair Value | ||
| | | | | | | | |
HYPE |
| | | $ | | | $ | |
Total |
| | | $ | | | $ | |
Cost basis is equal to the cost of the HYPE tokens, net of any transaction fees, if any, at the time of purchase or upon receipt. Fair value represents the quoted HYPE token prices within the Company’s principal market at the time of measurement (midnight UTC).
The receipts of HYPE from native staking represent the rewards and commissions earned from native staking. During both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2025, the Company recognized cumulative realized gains of $
Digital intangible assets
The following table sets forth the cost basis, impairment amount, and carrying amount of digital intangible assets held, as shown on the balance sheet as of September 30, 2025:
| | | | | | | | |
|
| Units |
| Cost |
| Carrying Value | ||
HiHYPE | | | | $ | | | $ | |
Other digital assets | | | |
| | |
| |
Total | | | | $ | | | $ | |
The Company tracks the cost of HiHYPE by lot. Impairment losses for HiHYPE are recognized when a lot’s carrying value falls below its fair value, which is measured on a daily basis during the holding period. The fair value of HiHYPE is determined using observable Level 1 and Level 2 inputs, primarily consisting of market prices for a similar asset - specifically, the original HYPE tokens exchanged
13
Table of Contents
HYPERION DEFI, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
for HiHYPE. For the period ending September 30, 2025, the Company reported an impairment loss of $
HYPE Staking
Beginning in July 2025, the Company used the proceeds from its capital raising activities to acquire and deploy HYPE in staking activities, which includes native staking and liquid staking.
Native Staking
The Company jointly operates a co-branded Hyperliquid validator, known as “Kinetiq × Hyperion” (“KxH”), with Kinetiq Research Pte (“Kinetiq”) and Pier Two Pty Ltd (“Pier Two”). Commission income from validation services, in the form of HYPE, is shared among the Company, Kinetiq and Pier Two. The Company participates in native staking by delegating its own HYPE digital assets to the co-branded KxH validator node and receives staking rewards in return. The Company is also entitled to commission income charged to third party delegators, for successfully validating transactions. These rewards are received by the Company directly from the Hyperliquid network.
As of September 30, 2025, the Company had native staked
Liquid Staking
The Company engages in liquid staking arrangements, through staking HYPE in exchange for a receipt token (HiHYPE). HiHYPE is a liquid staking receipt token with a floating redemption rate, based on the value of underlying staked HYPE and related rewards, penalties, and fees. HiHYPE can be transferred, monetized, and used in other types of transactions, even while the underlying HYPE assets remain staked.
Upon depositing HYPE into the liquid staking pool, the Company recognizes any realized gains or losses on the HYPE in accordance with ASC 610-20, Other Income—Gains and Losses from the Derecognition of Nonfinancial Assets as the Company does not control the HYPE deposited into the liquid staking pool.
Staking rewards that accrued to staked HYPE in the liquid staking pool were not recognized as revenue in the quarter ended September 30, 2025. These rewards will not be recognized until HiHYPE tokens are redeemed or sold.
Note 7 – Accrued Expenses and Other Current Liabilities
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities consisted of the following:
| | | | | | |
|
| September 30, |
| December 31, | ||
|
| 2025 |
| 2024 | ||
Accrued dividend | | | | | | |
Accrued compensation expense | | | | | | |
Accrued professional services | | | | | | |
Accrued rework of clinical supply returns | | | | | | |
Accrued licensee reimbursement | | | | | | |
Other accrued expenses | |
| | | | |
Total accrued expenses and other current liabilities | | $ | | | $ | |
Accrued Former Licensor Obligations
On August 15, 2023, the Company entered into a license agreement (the “License Agreement”) with Formosa Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Formosa”), whereby the Company acquired an exclusive license to commercialize, in the United States and its territories, products related to a novel formulation of Clobetasol Proprionate. On June 6, 2025 (the “Termination Date”), the Company and Formosa entered
14
Table of Contents
HYPERION DEFI, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
into the Mutual Termination Agreement, whereby the License Agreement (and all other agreements between the Company and Formosa) would be terminated, subject to certain terms and conditions. Formosa and the Company each agreed to provide the other party with a release of all claims, including Formosa releasing the Company from total obligations of $
Note 8 – Notes Payable and Convertible Notes Payable
Notes payable and convertible notes payable consisted of the following:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | September 30, 2025 | | December 31, 2024 | ||||||||||||||
|
| Notes Payable |
| Debt Discount |
| Net |
| Notes Payable |
| Debt Discount |
| Net | ||||||
Avenue - Note payable | | $ | | | $ | ( | | $ | | | $ | | | $ | ( | | $ | |
Avenue - Convertible note payable | |
| — | |
| — | |
| — | |
| | |
| ( | |
| |
| | $ | | | $ | ( | | $ | | | $ | | | $ | ( | | $ | |
First Quarter 2025 Amendment
On February 21, 2025, the Company entered into a Second Amendment (the “Second Amendment”) to Supplement to the Loan and Security Agreement (the “Avenue Loan Agreement”) with Avenue Venture Opportunities Fund, L.P., and Avenue Venture Opportunities Fund II, L.P., (together “Avenue” or the “Lenders”) whereby the Lenders agreed to defer principal and interest payments on amounts outstanding until the end of September 2025. Deferred interest continued to accrue on the outstanding principal amount at the interest rate stated in the original Avenue Loan Agreement.
Under the Second Amendment, the Company agreed to use a portion of the proceeds from its at-the-market offering (see Note 10 – Stockholders’ Equity, At-The-Market Offering) to pay down the outstanding principal amount under the Avenue Loan Agreement as follows: a) until the Company raised $
Pursuant to the Second Amendment, at any time on or after April 1, 2025, the Lenders also had the right, at their discretion, but not the obligation, to convert an aggregate amount of up to $
The Second Amendment of the Avenue Loan was accounted for as an extinguishment, due to the addition of the substantive conversion option. Accordingly, the $
Second Quarter 2025 Amendments
On May 30, 2025, the Company entered into the Third Amendment to Supplement to the Avenue Loan Agreement (the “Third Amendment”). Pursuant to the Third Amendment, the conversion rights provided to the Lenders under the Second Amendment were revised to restrict the Lenders from exercising such conversion right if doing so would cause the Lenders and their affiliates to beneficially own more than
15
Table of Contents
HYPERION DEFI, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
shares of common stock with a written notice to the Company and provided that such an increase in the beneficial ownership limitation would not have been effective until
On June 17, 2025, the Company entered into the Fourth Amendment which, among other things, extended the maturity date of the loans to July 1, 2028; provided for an interest-only period from July 1, 2025 until January 31, 2027; reduced the interest rate from
In connection with the Fourth Amendment, the Company issued to the Lenders warrants (the “Lender Warrants”) to purchase an aggregate of
The Company determined that the Fourth Amendment should be accounted for as a troubled debt restructuring. Because the remaining undiscounted cash flows of the Avenue Loan exceed the June 17, 2025 carrying value,
Note 9 – Commitments and Contingencies
Litigations, Claims and Assessments
The Company may be involved in legal proceedings, claims and assessments arising in the ordinary course of business. The Company records legal costs associated with loss contingencies as incurred and accrues for all probable and estimable settlements.
Note 10 – Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)
Increase of 2018 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan Shares
On January 21, 2025, the stockholders approved an amendment to the Company’s Amended and Restated 2018 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan to reserve an additional
On August 19, 2025, the Company filed a certificate of amendment to its Third Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended with the Secretary of State of Delaware to increase the total number of shares of common stock, par value $
At-The-Market Offering
During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2025, the Company received approximately $
16
Table of Contents
HYPERION DEFI, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
On September 24, 2025, the Company entered into Amendment No. 1 (the “Amendment”) to the Amended and Restated Sales Agreement (the “A&R Sales Agreement”) with Chardan Capital Markets, LLC, with respect to the Company’s existing at-the-market offering program. The Amendment, among other things, increases the aggregate offering price under the A&R Sales Agreement from $
Stock-Based Compensation Expense
The Company records stock-based compensation expense related to stock options and restricted stock units (“RSUs”). For the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024, the Company recorded stock-based compensation expense allocated as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the Three Months Ended | | For the Nine Months Ended | ||||||||
|
| September 30, |
| September 30, | ||||||||
|
| 2025 |
| 2024 |
| 2025 |
| 2024 | ||||
Research and development | | $ | | | $ | | | $ | | | $ | |
Selling, general and administrative | | | ( | | | | | | | | | |
| | $ | ( | | $ | | | $ | | | $ | |
The Company agreed to grant a fully vested RSU award to a senior executive upon his hire date in June 2025, which was subject to stockholder approval of an increase in the shares available for issuance under the Company’s equity compensation plan. Accordingly, the service inception date of the award preceded the grant date. The full fair value of the award was expensed in June and accrued at that time, but it was not formally granted until August 2025, at which time the Company was required to adjust the fair value to the new current fair value. Because the fair value of the award was lower at the grant date than the service inception date, there was a reversal of compensation expense in the third quarter. This reversal resulted in a credit to stock-based compensation expense in the amount of $
Stock Options
A summary of the option activity during the nine months ended September 30, 2025 is presented below:
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Weighted | | Average | | | | | | |
| | Average | | Remaining | | Aggregate | | | | |
| | Number of | | Exercise | | Life |
| Intrinsic | ||
|
| Options |
| Price |
| In Years |
| Value | ||
Outstanding, January 1, 2025 |
| | | $ | |
|
|
| |
|
Granted |
| | |
| |
|
|
| |
|
Exercised |
| — | |
| — |
|
|
| |
|
Forfeited |
| ( | |
| |
|
|
| |
|
Outstanding, September 30, 2025 |
| | | $ | |
| | $ | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Exercisable, September 30, 2025 |
| | | $ | |
| | $ | — | |
17
Table of Contents
HYPERION DEFI, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
The following table presents information related to stock options as of September 30, 2025:
| | | | | | |
Options Outstanding |
| Options Exercisable | ||||
| | | | Weighted | | |
| | | | Average | | |
Exercise | | Number of | | Remaining Life | | Number of |
Price |
| Options |
| In Years |
| Options |
$ |
| |
| — |
| — |
$ |
| |
|
| | |
$ |
| |
|
| | |
$ |
| |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
| | |
In applying the Black-Scholes option pricing model to stock options granted, the Company used the following approximate assumptions:
| | | | | | | | | |
|
| For the Three Months Ended |
| For the Nine Months Ended |
| ||||
| | September 30, | | September 30, |
| ||||
| | 2025 | | 2024 | | 2025 | | 2024 |
|
Expected term (years) |
|
|
|
| | ||||
Risk free interest rate |
| | % | % | | % | % | ||
Expected volatility |
| | % | % | | % | % | ||
Expected dividends |
| | % | | % | | % | | % |
During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2025, the Company recorded $
Restricted Stock Units
A summary of the restricted stock units (“RSUs”) activity during the nine months ended September 30, 2025 is presented below:
| | | | | |
|
|
|
| Weighted | |
| | | | Average | |
| | Number of | | Grant Date | |
|
| RSUs |
| Price | |
RSUs non-vested January 1, 2025 |
| | | $ | |
Granted |
| | |
| |
Vested |
| ( | |
| |
Forfeited |
| ( | |
| |
RSUs non-vested September 30, 2025 |
| | | $ | |
| | | | | |
Vested RSUs undelivered September 30, 2025 |
| | | $ | |
18
Table of Contents
HYPERION DEFI, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
During the three months ended September 30, 2025,
| | | | |
|
| August 31, 2025 |
| September 29, 2025 |
| | Award | | Award |
Risk free interest rate |
| | ||
Term |
|
| ||
Volatility |
| | ||
Dividends |
| n/a |
| n/a |
RSUs have been granted to directors, employees and contractors in accordance with the Company’s Amended and Restated 2018 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan. Some RSUs are subject to delayed delivery of the shares underlying the vested RSUs until the termination of grantee service. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2025, the Company recorded ($
June 2025 Series A Preferred Stock Securities Purchase Agreement
On June 17, 2025, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) with institutional accredited investors whereby the Company offered units consisting of a share of Series A Non-Voting Convertible Preferred Stock (“Series A Preferred Stock”) and a warrant to purchase
On June 20, 2025, the Company filed a Certificate of Designation of Preferences, Rights and Limitations to provide for the designation of
The Company incurred cash issuance costs of $
The Company has determined that the Series A Preferred Stock, plus the investor and placement agent warrants, qualified to be equity classified.
19
Table of Contents
HYPERION DEFI, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
Warrants
During the quarter ended March 31, 2025, the Company entered into an inducement offer (the “Inducement Offer”) with an investor (the “Investor”), by which the Company agreed to reduce the exercise price of existing warrants to purchase
Modification accounting was only performed on the warrants that were actually exercised pursuant to the Inducement Offer as it represented a short-term inducement. The Company recognized the $
The table below presents the assumptions that were used before and after the modification date. There was no warrant activity other than on the modification date. The following inputs were utilized to value the warrants for the Inducement Offer:
| | | | |
|
| Before Modification |
| After Modification |
Risk free interest rate |
| | ||
Term |
| | ||
Volatility |
| | ||
Dividends |
| n/a | | n/a |
A summary of the warrant activity during the nine months ended September 30, 2025 is presented below:
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
| |
|
| | | Weighted |
|
| |
| | | | Weighted | | Average | | | | |
| | | | Average | | Remaining | | Aggregate | ||
| | Number of | | Exercise | | Life | | Intrinsic | ||
|
| Warrants |
| Price |
| In Years |
| Value | ||
Outstanding January 1, 2025 |
| | | $ | | |
|
|
|
|
Issued |
| | |
| | |
|
|
|
|
Repriced - (Old) |
| ( | |
| | |
|
|
|
|
Repriced - (New) |
| | |
| | |
|
|
|
|
Expired | | ( | | | | | | | | |
Exercised |
| ( | |
| | |
|
|
|
|
Outstanding September 30, 2025 |
| | | $ | | |
| $ | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Exercisable September 30, 2025 |
| | | $ | | |
| $ | | |
20
Table of Contents
HYPERION DEFI, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
The following table presents information related to warrants as of September 30, 2025:
| | | | | | | |
Warrants Outstanding |
| Warrants Exercisable | |||||
| | | | Weighted | | | |
| | Outstanding | | Average | | Exercisable | |
Exercise | | Number of | | Remaining Life | | Number of | |
Price |
| Warrants |
| In Years |
| Warrants | |
$ | |
| | | — |
| — |
$ | |
| | |
| | |
$ | |
| | |
| | |
$ | | | | | | | |
$ | | | | | | | |
$ | | | | | | | |
$ | |
| |
|
| | |
| |
| |
|
| | |
Note 11 - Segment Reporting
The Company has
21
Table of Contents
HYPERION DEFI, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
The following tables summarize the activity of the Company’s segments for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||
|
| September 30, 2025 |
| September 30, 2024 | ||||||||||||||
| | Ophthalmic | | Digital | | | | | Ophthalmic | | Digital | | | | ||||
|
| Technology |
| Assets |
| Total |
| Technology |
| Assets |
| Total | ||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Revenue: |
| |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
Revenue | | $ | — | | $ | | | $ | | | $ | | | $ | — | | $ | |
Less: | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| |
Cost of revenue | |
| — | |
| — | |
| — | |
| ( | |
| — | |
| ( |
Gross Profit (Loss) | |
| — | |
| | |
| | |
| ( | |
| — | |
| ( |
Less: | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| |
Research and Development | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| |
Salaries and benefits | |
| | |
| — | |
| | |
| | |
| — | |
| |
Direct clinical and non-clinical expenses | |
| | |
| — | |
| | |
| | |
| — | |
| |
Facilities expenses | |
| | |
| — | |
| | |
| | |
| — | |
| |
Non-cash stock based compensation expenses | |
| | |
| — | |
| | |
| | |
| — | |
| |
Supplies and materials | |
| — | |
| — | |
| — | |
| | |
| — | |
| |
Other expenses | |
| | |
| — | |
| | |
| | |
| — | |
| |
Depreciation expense | |
| — | |
| — | |
| — | |
| | |
| — | |
| |
Realized gains - digital assets | | | — | | | ( | | | ( | | | — | | | — | | | — |
Unrealized gains - digital assets | |
| — | |
| ( | |
| ( | |
| — | |
| — | |
| — |
Impairment loss - digital intangible assets | |
| — | |
| | |
| | |
| — | |
| — | |
| — |
Segment income (loss) | | | ( | | | | | | | | | ( | | | — | | | ( |
Reconciling Items | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Selling, general and administrative expense (1) | |
| — | | | — | | | | | | — | | | — | | | |
Other (income) expense, net (2) | | | — | | | — | | | ( | | | — | | | — | | | |
Net Income (Loss) | | $ | ( | | $ | | | $ | | | $ | ( | | $ | — | | $ | ( |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the Nine Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||
| | September 30, 2025 | | September 30, 2024 | ||||||||||||||
| | Ophthalmic | | Digital | | | | Ophthalmic |
| Digital |
| | ||||||
|
| Technology |
| Assets |
| Total |
| Technology |
| Assets |
| Total | ||||||
Revenue: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Revenue | | $ | | | $ | | | $ | | | $ | | | $ | — | | $ | |
Less: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cost of revenue | | | ( | | | — | | | ( | | | ( | | | — | | | ( |
Gross Profit (Loss) | | | | | | | | | | | | ( | | | — | | | ( |
Less: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | |
Research and Development | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Salaries and benefits | | | | | | — | | | | | | | | | — | | | |
Direct clinical and non-clinical expenses | | | | | | — | | | | | | | | | — | | | |
Facilities expenses | | | | | | — | | | | | | | | | — | | | |
Non-cash stock based compensation expenses | | | | | | — | | | | | | | | | — | | | |
Supplies and materials | | | | | | — | | | | | | | | | — | | | |
Other expenses | | | | | | — | | | | | | | | | — | | | |
Depreciation expense | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | | | | — | | | |
Reacquisition of license rights | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | |
Realized gains - digital assets | | | — | | | ( | | | ( | | | — | | | — | | | — |
Unrealized gains - digital assets | | | — | | | ( | | | ( | | | — | | | — | | | — |
Impairment loss - digital intangible assets | | | — | | | | | | | | | — | | | — | | | — |
Segment income (loss) | | | ( | | | | | | | | | ( | | | — | | | ( |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Reconciling Items | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Selling, general and administrative expense (1) | | | — | | | — | | | | | | — | | | — | | | |
Other (income) expense, net (2) | | | — | | | — | | | ( | | | — | | | — | | | |
Net Income (Loss) | | $ | ( | | $ | | | $ | ( | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | ( |
| (1) | Selling, general and administrative expenses primarily include general and administrative compensation expenses, professional fees, sales and marketing expenses, insurance and facilities expenses. |
22
Table of Contents
HYPERION DEFI, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
| (2) | Other (income) expense, net includes interest income, interest expense and gain on extinguishment of liabilities. |
The following table summarizes the segment assets as of September 30, 2025 and December 31, 2024:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| September 30, 2025 |
| December 31, 2024 | ||||||||||||||
| | Ophthalmic | | Digital | | | | | Ophthalmic | | Digital | | | | ||||
|
| Technology |
| Assets |
| Total |
| Technology |
| Assets |
| Total | ||||||
Segment Assets | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash | | $ | | | $ | — | | $ | | | $ | | | $ | — | | $ | |
Digital assets | |
| — | |
| | |
| | |
| — | |
| — | |
| — |
All other assets | |
| | |
| — | |
| | |
| | |
| — | |
| |
Total Assets | | $ | | | $ | | | $ | | | $ | | | $ | — | | $ | |
Note 12 - Subsequent Events
At-The-Market Offering
Subsequent to September 30, 2025, the Company received approximately $
HYPE Digital Token Activity
Subsequent to September 30, 2025, the Company purchased approximately
Hype Asset Use Service Agreement
On October 28, 2025, the Company entered into a Hype Asset Use Service Agreement (the “HAUS Agreement”) with Felix Foundation (“Felix”) to support the deployment of a perpetual futures market on the Hyperliquid protocol.
Under the HAUS Agreement, the Company will allocate
The HAUS Agreement has an initial term of
Joint Validator Operators’ Agreement
On October 27, 2025, the Company entered into a Joint Validator Operators’ Agreement (the “Joint Validator Agreement”) with Kinetiq and Pier Two, effective retroactively to June 25, 2025. The Joint Validator Agreement formalizes the parties’ collaboration in jointly operating a co-branded validator node (“Kinetiq × Hyperion” or “KxH Node”) on the Hyperliquid Layer-1 blockchain (“Hyperliquid”).
Under the Joint Validator Agreement, Hyperion initiated the validator with
The Joint Validator Agreement outlines shared responsibilities for validator operations, governance, incident response, and performance monitoring. It includes a revenue-sharing arrangement whereby staking commissions and other validator-level rewards are allocated among Hyperion, Kinetiq Group and Pier Two, with specific overrides for referred delegations.
The Joint Validator Agreement is effective for an initial term of
23
Table of Contents
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation
The following discussion and analysis of the results of operations and financial condition of Hyperion DeFi, Inc. (“Hyperion DeFi” the “Company,” “we,” “us” and “our”) as of September 30, 2025 and for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024 should be read in conjunction with our unaudited condensed financial statements and the notes thereto included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q as well as our financial statements and the notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024 (the “2024 Form 10-K”), as amended by Amendment No. 1 to the 2024 Form 10- K (the “2024 Form 10-K Amendment”).
Forward Looking Statements
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains “forward-looking statements” that involve risks and uncertainties, as well as assumptions that, if they never materialize or prove incorrect, could cause our results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. The statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q that are not purely historical are forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Such forward-looking statements include our estimates regarding expenses, future revenue, capital requirements and our need for additional financing and other financial items; any statements regarding the viability of, and risks associated with, our cryptocurrency treasury strategy; any statements of the plans, strategies and objectives of management for future operations; any statements about the advantages of our platform technology; estimates regarding the potential market opportunity for our platform technology; factors that may affect our operating results; statements about our ability to establish and maintain intellectual property rights; statements about our ability to retain key personnel and hire necessary employees and appropriately staff our operations; statements related to future capital expenditures; statements related to future economic conditions or performance; and other matters that do not relate strictly to historical facts or statements of assumptions underlying any of the foregoing. Forward-looking statements are often identified by the use of words such as, but not limited to, “anticipate,” “believe,” “can,” “continue,” “could,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “may,” “might,” “will,” “plan,” “project,” “seek,” “should,” “target,” “would,” and similar expressions or variations intended to identify forward-looking statements. These statements are based on the beliefs and assumptions of our management based on information currently available to management. Such forward-looking statements are subject to risks, uncertainties and other important factors that could cause actual results and the timing of certain events to differ materially from future results expressed or implied by such forward – looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to, those discussed in the sections titled “Summary Risk Factors” and “Risk Factors” included in Item 1A of Part I of the 2024 Form 10-K, as filed with the SEC on April 15, 2025, as amended by the 2024 Form 10-K Amendment, and the risks discussed in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q as well as our other filings made with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). Furthermore, such forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Except as required by law, we undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of such statements.
Disclaimer
Certain information contained in this Item 2 relate to or are based on studies, publications, surveys and other data obtained from third-party sources and Hyperion DeFi’s own internal estimates and research. While Hyperion DeFi believes these third-party studies, publications, surveys and other data to be reliable as of the date of this report, it has not independently verified, and makes no representation as to, the adequacy, fairness, accuracy or completeness of any information obtained from third-party sources. In addition, no independent source has evaluated the reasonableness or accuracy of Hyperion DeFi’s internal estimates or research and no reliance should be made on any information or statements made in this report relating to or based on such internal estimates and research. You should conduct your own investigation and analysis of Hyperion DeFi, its business, prospects, results of operations and financial condition. In furnishing this information, Hyperion DeFi does not undertake any obligation to provide you with access to any additional information (including forward-looking information and any projections contained herein) or to update or correct the information, except as may be required by law.
Overview
Hyperion DeFi, Inc., formerly known as Eyenovia, Inc., is the first U.S. publicly listed company building a long-term strategic treasury of HYPE in addition to being a pioneering digital ophthalmic technology company. We are working to provide our shareholders with simplified exposure to the Hyperliquid ecosystem, which we believe to be one of the highest revenue-generating blockchains in the world. At the same time, we continue to execute on our planned completion of development and registration of our Optejet ophthalmic liquid delivery device.
24
Table of Contents
HYPE Treasury
Hyperliquid is a layer one (L1) blockchain engineered for transparent high-frequency finance. The blockchain hosts fully on-chain perpetual futures and spot order books, with every order, cancel, trade and liquidation occurring within 70 millisecond block times and offering up to 200,000 transactions per second, resulting in near-instant trade settlement. The Hyperliquid blockchain also hosts the HyperEVM, a general-purpose smart contract platform that, like Ethereum, supports permissionless decentralized financial applications.
Hyperliquid supports non-custodial trading via its performant HyperCore order books, with perpetual futures trading for a range of digital assets with Bitcoin (BTC), Ether (ETH), Ripple (XRP), Solana (SOL) and Sui (SUI) driving its utilization. Perpetual futures are a type of cryptocurrency derivative contract that allows traders to speculate on the price of an asset without owning the underlying asset itself. Unlike traditional futures contracts, perpetual futures have no expiration date, allowing traders to hold positions indefinitely, as long as they meet margin requirements. Hyperliquid utilizes a traditional order book system. This approach allows traders to place bids and asks for various assets, more akin to a centralized cryptocurrency exchange than other decentralized exchanges that rely on automated market makers to fulfill orders. The Hyperliquid blockchain is available to any potential user with a compatible cryptocurrency wallet such as MetaMask, Phantom, and Coinbase Wallet. However, Hyperliquid interface operators can choose to block persons in certain jurisdictions or sanctioned wallets as required via solutions such as geoblocking and address screening.
HYPE is the native token of Hyperliquid. The total supply of HYPE is 1 billion, with 31% of the supply issued in November 2024. 38.88% of the total supply is reserved for future community emissions. HYPE serves multiple purposes: users can stake HYPE to reduce their trading fees, use it to conduct transactions on the HyperEVM, and even use it as collateral on various DeFi applications. In addition, Hyperliquid has a unique network mechanism that autonomously purchases and removes HYPE tokens from circulation. This is done by using the trading fees generated on the network’s order books to buy back available HYPE: approximately 99% of daily fees are allocated to this mechanism, which serves as a consistent “marginal buyer” for the token. As of October 2025, more than 30 million HYPE have been removed from circulation.
The Hyperliquid L1 is a proof-of-stake blockchain, in which validators that have staked the threshold number of HYPE are selected to produce blocks, and will receive rewards when they successfully validate blocks. Holders of HYPE can delegate to validators who then are able to vote on certain decisions regarding the platform, such as the listing and de-listing of new markets. Any holder of HYPE can delegate HYPE to a validator to earn staking rewards, should the validator successfully participate in network consensus. Staked HYPE is locked until un-staked, subject to a seven-day un-staking queue before HYPE is released back to the user. The Company initialized the staking process on July 1, 2025, and as of September 30, 2025, it had approximately 834,050.16 HYPE staked directly to the Kinetiq x Hyperion validator, described further below.
Key Metrics of Hyperliquid and HYPE as of October 31, 2025
| ● | One of the highest revenue generating blockchain cryptocurrencies; ranked #11 market cap (excluding stablecoins) |
| ● | Hyperliquid generates annual revenue of approximately $1.3 billion, based on an October 2025 observed run-rate of $3-$3.5 million per day. In addition, platforms built on Hyperliquid earn approximately $2 million in fees per day, bringing the total to $5 million per day across the blockchain and platforms |
| ● | Approximately 99% of Hyperliquid revenues are used by the Hyperliquid Assistance Fund, which has cumulatively purchased and owns 34.25 million HYPE tokens with a market value of $1.45 billion |
| ● | There have been over 800,000 cumulative Hyperliquid marketplace users since inception |
| ● | The Hyperliquid Token’s maximum supply is 1 billion, of which the circulating supply is 337 million, corresponding to a market capitalization outstanding of approximately $14.3 billion |
| ● | Daily trading volume on Hyperliquid exceeds $12 billion |
| ● | Cumulative Hyperliquid fees have exceeded $700 million since inception |
| ● | Cumulative cryptocurrency perpetuals trading volume on Hyperliquid has exceeded $3 trillion since inception |
25
Table of Contents
Digital Assets Business Activities
Since the Company first pivoted to its Hyperliquid DeFi strategy, we have continued to emphasize that our business is “more than just HYPE”. The accumulation of HYPE is the first step in a broader DeFi monetization roadmap that continues to accelerate.
As part of our broader on-chain engagement strategy, we announced a co-branded Hyperliquid validator referred to as “Kinetiq x Hyperion”, with Kinetiq, a liquid staking protocol built natively for the Hyperliquid ecosystem. Validator operations are further supported by infrastructure provided by Pier Two, an institutional staking services provider. Under our Joint Validator Operators Agreement, we pay a percentage of validator commissions to each of Kinetiq and Pier Two, both of which provide supporting services for the validator. By running our own validator, we can directly access HYPE staking yield in addition to supporting Hyperliquid’s network stability and security. With the rapid growth of our Kinetiq x Hyperion validator, which has over 13 million in delegated HYPE as of October 31, 2025, we play a meaningful role in stewarding the future growth of the Hyperliquid ecosystem, given that HYPE is required to participate in ecosystem governance.
In addition to our validator operations, staked HYPE can be deployed to access various utilities in the Hyperliquid ecosystem. For example, HYPE staked in user accounts reduces their trading fees or increases the revenue share from referring new users, both of which could serve as revenue opportunities for the Company. Specifically, the validator potentially enables us to create unique financial products built around the demand for these network benefits from those who do not have access to HYPE. With this opportunity identified, we developed and launched the HYPE Asset Use Service product (HAUS), a first-of-its-kind on-chain service, and announced our first deal with proprietary trading firm Credo. Through this HAUS Credo arrangement, we provided the use of staked HYPE to Credo, enabling them to access substantial fee reductions when trading on Hyperliquid, and a share of the resulting net fee savings return to us as revenues. More importantly, we believe that this arrangement will encourage trading firms and broader market participants that trade on other venues to migrate additional trading volume and activity to Hyperliquid.
More recently, the Hyperliquid network implemented the HIP-3 (Hyperliquid Improvement Proposal 3) upgrade, which enables any user with 500,000 HYPE staked at a deployer address to launch a custom on-chain perpetual futures market for non-crypto assets such as equities, commodities and indices. These network upgrades expand both Hyperliquid’s product suite and its potential user base, further establishing it as a premier on-chain destination for financial activity. To support HIP-3, the Company provided Felix, one of the earliest HyperEVM protocols, with the HYPE required to launch a perpetuals future market and will earn a share of the fees earned from trading activity.
Beyond engaging with Hyperliquid’s flagship exchange product, users can also deploy HYPE into the HyperEVM for various strategies such as lending and liquidity provisioning. The Company is the first public company on HyperEVM, staking a significant portion of its native HYPE into Kinetiq’s uniquely designed iHYPE (institutional HYPE) product. This enabled the Company to earn staking yield on its HYPE while also gaining access to a unique liquid receipt token, HiHYPE (Hyperion iHYPE), which is used for various on-chain and off-chain strategies. The Company has also earned kPoints, a participation-based incentive that qualifies the Company to receive a portion of the upcoming airdrop of Kinetiq’s KNTQ token. This reflects yet another DeFi strategy that translates into additional yield from and ownership of key products built on Hyperliquid.
By prudently building and deploying a treasury of HYPE, we believe that we can rapidly accelerate the growth of the Hyperliquid ecosystem and further its adoption, potentially creating a powerful flywheel effect that may drive platform usage, increase protocol value and strengthen the long-term position of both the Hyperliquid ecosystem and the Company.
The Optejet
We are also developing the proprietary Optejet User Filled Device (the “Optejet UFD”) that is designed to work with a variety of topical ophthalmic liquids, including artificial tears and lens rewetting products. The Optejet UFD is especially useful in chronic front-of-the-eye diseases due to its ease of use, enhanced safety and tolerability, and potential for superior compliance monitoring versus standard eye drops. Together, these benefits may result in higher treatment compliance and better outcomes for patients and providers.
The ergonomic and functional design of the Optejet UFD allows for horizontal drug delivery and eliminates the need to tilt the head back or the manual dexterity to squeeze a bottle to administer medications. Drug is delivered in a microscopic array of droplets that is comfortable and matches the amount of fluid that the front of the eye can hold. The precise delivery of a low-volume columnar spray by the Optejet UFD helps ensure instillation success while minimizing contamination risk with a non-protruding nozzle and self-closing shutter. In clinical trials, the Optejet UFD has demonstrated that its targeted delivery achieves a high rate of successful
26
Table of Contents
administration, with 98% of sprays being accurately delivered upon first attempt compared to the established rate reported with traditional eye drops of approximately 50%.
A more physiologically appropriate volume of medication in the range of seven to ten microliters is delivered by the Optejet UFD, which is approximately one-fifth of the 35 to 50 microliter dose typically delivered in a single eye drop. Lower volume of medication exposes the ocular surface to less active ingredients and preservatives, potentially reducing ocular stress and surface damage and improving tolerability. The lower volume also minimizes the potential for drug to enter systemic circulation, with the goal of avoiding some common side effects that are related to overdosing of the eye.
We anticipate registering the second generation of the Optejet UFD as a liquid drug delivery device, based on our experience with MydCombi®. MydCombi was the only Food and Drug Administration-approved fixed combination of the two leading mydriatic agents, tropicamide and phenylephrine, in the United States delivered with technology that is nearly identical to the first generation of the Optejet UFD.
Nasdaq Compliance
On April 29, 2025, we received a notice from the Staff of Nasdaq stating that the Company’s stockholders’ equity as reported in the 2024 Form 10-K was below the minimum $2,500,000 required for continued listing under Listing Rule 5550(b)(1) (the “Minimum Equity Requirement”). The Notice had no immediate effect on the listing of the Company’s common stock on the Nasdaq Capital Market. The Company submitted a plan to regain compliance with the Nasdaq Listing Rules. On September 2, 2025, we received notice from the Staff of Nasdaq that the Company was now in compliance with the Nasdaq Listing Rules and that the matter was closed.
The Private Placement
On June 20, 2025, we received approximately $50 million in gross proceeds in connection with the closing of a private placement (the “Private Placement”). Pursuant to the Securities Purchase Agreement, dated as of June 17, 2025, in the Private Placement, the purchasers purchased an aggregate of 5,128,205 shares of Series A Convertible Non-Voting Preferred Stock (convertible into up to 15,384,615 shares of common stock) (the “Series A Preferred Stock”) and warrants to purchase up to 30,769,230 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $3.25 per share. We used the net proceeds from the Private Placement to build a reserve of a token called HYPE.
In connection with the Private Placement, we entered into a Registration Rights Agreement (the “Registration Rights Agreement”) with the purchasers, which provided that the Company would register the resale of the shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of the Series A Preferred Stock and exercise of the warrants. The Company filed a registration statement with the SEC pursuant to the Registration Rights Agreement on July 18, 2025.
Chardan Capital Markets LLC (“Chardan”) acted as placement agent for us in connection with the Private Placement. Pursuant to the Engagement Letter, dated as of June 17, 2025, as compensation for its services, we issued to Chardan 307,692 shares of Series A Preferred Stock (convertible into up to 923,076 shares of common stock) and Placement Agent Warrants to purchase up to 1,846,153 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $3.25 per share.
At-The-Market Offering
On September 24, 2025, we entered into Amendment No. 1 (the “Amendment”) to the Amended and Restated Sales Agreement (the “A&R Sales Agreement”) with Chardan Capital Markets, LLC, with respect to our existing at-the-market offering program. The Amendment increases the aggregate offering amount under the A&R Sales Agreement from $50 million to $100 million.
During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2025, we received approximately $21.8 million and $30.0 million, respectively, in net proceeds from the sale of 1,929,207 and 4,379,696 shares of its common stock pursuant to the sales agreement with Chardan Capital Markets, LLC in its “at-the-market” offering.
Fourth Amendment of the Avenue Loan
On June 17, 2025, the Company and the Lenders entered into the Fourth Amendment to Supplement to the Loan and Security Agreement (the “Fourth Amendment”). The Fourth Amendment, among other things, extended the maturity date of the loans under the Loan and Security Agreement to July 1, 2028; provided for an interest-only period from July 1, 2025 until January 31, 2027; reduced
27
Table of Contents
the interest rate on the loans from 12.0% to 8.0%, payable half in cash and half in kind; eliminated the option of the Lenders to convert an aggregate amount of up to $10.0 million of the loans outstanding into shares of common stock; and provided us with the option to prepay debt owed under the Loan and Security Agreement in part. In connection with the Fourth Amendment, we issued to the Lenders warrants to purchase an aggregate of 350,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $4.00 per share.
Corporate Information
We were organized as a corporation under the laws of the State of Florida on March 12, 2014 under the name “PGP Holdings V, Inc.” On May 5, 2014, we changed our name to Eyenovia, Inc. On October 6, 2014, we reincorporated in the State of Delaware by merging into Eyenovia, Inc., a Delaware corporation. On July 1, 2025, we changed our name to Hyperion DeFi, Inc. Our principal executive office is located at 23461 S. Pointe Drive, Suite 390, Laguna Hills, CA 92653, and our telephone number is (833) 393-6684. We maintain a website at www.hyperiondefi.com, to which we regularly post copies of our press releases as well as additional information about us. The information contained on, or that can be accessed through, our website is not a part of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. We have included our website address in this quarterly report solely as an inactive textual reference.
Implications of Being a Smaller Reporting Company
We are a “smaller reporting company” as defined under the Exchange Act. We may take advantage of certain of the scaled disclosures available to smaller reporting companies until the last day of the fiscal year in which (i) the market value of our common stock held by non-affiliates exceeds $250 million as of the end of that year’s second fiscal quarter and our annual revenue exceeds $100 million during such completed fiscal year, or (ii) the market value of our common stock held by non-affiliates exceeds $700 million, regardless of our annual revenue, as of the end of that year’s second fiscal quarter.
Our net losses were $5.5 million and $29.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024, respectively. As of September 30, 2025, we had working capital and an accumulated deficit of approximately $5.0 million and $200.9 million, respectively.
Financial Overview
Revenue and Cost of Revenue
Digital Assets
HYPE digital assets are initially recorded at cost and then subsequently remeasured at fair value as of the balance sheet date with changes in fair value recognized as unrealized gains or losses in operating income (expense). Upon derecognition of HYPE, the Company recognizes realized gains or losses in operating income (expense), based upon its fair value at the date of derecognition.
HiHYPE tokens and other digital assets are intangible assets with indefinite lives; they are not amortized but are subject to impairment. These assets are presented as digital intangible assets in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at cost, net of any recognized impairments. The Company tests digital intangible assets for impairment quarterly and more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that it is more likely than not that the asset is impaired. The test for impairment consists of a comparison of the fair value of the digital intangible assets with their carrying amounts. Should market prices fall below carrying value, the resulting difference is recognized as an impairment charge. Such impairment charges are presented as impairment of digital intangible assets in operating income (expense).
We jointly operate a validator node on the Hyperliquid blockchain network and earn HYPE as rewards and commission income for validating transactions and maintaining network security. These activities include both self-staking (using our own tokens) and providing validation services to third-party delegators. The provision of services related to transaction validation on the Hyperliquid blockchain network (through both staking rewards and commission income) is an output of our ordinary activities.
We recognize revenue by applying the guidance in ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“ASC 606”). HYPE earned from validator operations, in the form of staking rewards and commission income, are recognized as revenue when we satisfy our performance obligations (i.e., successfully validates blocks or transactions as determined by the protocol) ratably over the contract term, which is the length of an epoch. The HYPE earned are noncash consideration and therefore measured at fair value at the inception of each contract.
28
Table of Contents
Because we do not unilaterally control the validator, we are not the principal to the validation service. As such, we present staking rewards and commission income as revenue on a net basis, reflecting only the portion of protocol rewards and commission to which we are entitled.
Ophthalmic Technology
Revenue is earned from the sale of our ophthalmological products. However, we have ceased our sales efforts with respect to our ophthalmological products and had limited revenue from sales of such products during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2025.
Cost of sales consisted of the cost of the production of the ophthalmological products that were sold.
Research and Development Expenses
Ophthalmic Technology
During the 2025 periods presented in this report, our research and development expenses consisted primarily of internal salaries, benefits and non-cash stock-based compensation expenses incurred in connection with the research and development of our Optejet UFD device which we anticipate registering with the FDA in the coming months. We anticipate that our research and development expenses will decline after the Optejet UFD device is registered.
During the 2024 periods presented in this report, prior to the termination of our CHAPERONE study, our research and development expenses were incurred in connection with the research and development of our prior Optejet microdose therapeutics and consisted primarily of contract service expenses. Our research and development expenses consisted of:
| ● | direct clinical and non-clinical expenses, which include expenses incurred under agreements with contract research organizations, contract manufacturing organizations, and costs associated with preclinical activities, development activities and regulatory activities; |
| ● | personnel-related expenses, which include expenses related to consulting agreements with individuals that have since entered into employment agreements with us as well as salaries and other compensation of employees that is attributable to research and development activities; and |
| ● | facilities and other expenses, which include direct and allocated expenses for rent and maintenance of facilities, marketing, insurance and other supplies used in research and development activities. |
We expense research and development costs as incurred. We recorded costs for some development activities, such as clinical trials, based on an evaluation of the progress to completion of specific tasks using data such as subject enrollment, clinical site activations or other information our vendors provide to us.
29
Table of Contents
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
Digital Assets
HYPE digital assets are initially recorded at cost and then subsequently remeasured at fair value as of the balance sheet date with changes in fair value recognized as unrealized gains or losses in operating income (expense). Upon derecognition of HYPE, the Company recognizes realized gains or losses in operating income (expense).
HiHYPE tokens and Other Digital Assets are intangible assets with indefinite lives; they are not amortized but are subject to impairment. These assets are presented as digital intangible assets in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at cost, net of any recognized impairments. The Company tests digital intangible assets for impairment quarterly and more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that it is more likely than not that the asset is impaired. The test for impairment consists of a comparison of the fair value of the digital intangible assets with their carrying amounts. Should market prices fall below carrying value, the resulting difference is recognized as an impairment charge. Such impairment charges are presented as impairment of digital intangible assets in operating income (expense).
Ophthalmic Technology
General and administrative expenses consist primarily of payroll and related expenses, legal and other professional services, insurance expense, and non-cash stock-based compensation expense. We anticipate that our general and administrative expenses will decrease in the short term as requirements to support our continued research and development and commercial activities decline and in light of the conclusion of our review of strategic options, as well as a decline in our near term funding requirements following the closing of the Private Placement in June 2025 (see Note 10 – June 2025 Series A Preferred Stock Securities Purchase Agreements) and subsequent establishment of our treasury strategy.
Results of Operations
Three Months Ended September 30, 2025 Compared with Three Months Ended September 30, 2024
Revenue and Cost of Revenue
Revenue for the three months ended September 30, 2025 totaled $302,506, which was net staking revenue. As noted above, we present staking rewards and commission income as revenue on a net basis. Thus, there was no cost of revenue for the three months ended September 30, 2025.
Revenue for the three months ended September 30, 2024 totaled $1,625, which was offset by cost of revenues of $132,522. Cost of revenues primarily consisted of the write-down of inventories to net realizable value.
Research and Development Expenses
Research and development expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2025 totaled $0.4 million, a decrease of $3.1 million, or 89%, compared to $3.5 million recorded for the three months ended September 30, 2024. Research and development expenses consisted of the following:
| | | | | | |
| | For the Three Months Ended | ||||
| | September 30, | ||||
|
| 2025 |
| 2024 | ||
Salaries and benefits | | $ | 173,929 | | $ | 1,765,852 |
Direct clinical and non-clinical expenses | | | 19,896 | | | 610,404 |
Facilities expenses | | | 44,919 | | | 205,958 |
Non-cash stock based compensation expenses | | | 126,054 | | | 179,776 |
Supplies and materials | |
| — | |
| 331,352 |
Other expenses | |
| 9,056 | |
| 89,594 |
Depreciation expense | | | — | |
| 289,003 |
Total research and development expenses | | $ | 373,854 | | $ | 3,471,939 |
30
Table of Contents
The decrease in salaries and benefits and non-cash stock-based compensation was primarily due to the layoffs that occurred in the fourth quarter of 2024 after the termination of our CHAPERONE study and commercial operations in November 2024. The decrease in facilities expense was primarily due to the phase out of our Redwood City, CA and Reno, NV R&D and manufacturing locations during 2025, as we consolidated our focus to the development of the Optejet UFD to our Laguna Hills, CA facility. The reduction in direct clinical and non-clinical expenses and supplies and materials expense was primarily due to the termination of our CHAPERONE study. The decrease in depreciation expense was primarily due to the full impairment of fixed assets that occurred in the fourth quarter of 2024.
Selling General and Administrative Expenses
General and administrative expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2025 totaled $2.6 million, a decrease of $1.1 million, or 30%, compared to $3.7 million recorded for the three months ended September 30, 2024. General and administrative expenses consisted of the following:
| | | | | | | ||
|
| For the Three Months Ended September 30, | ||||||
| | 2025 |
| 2024 | ||||
Professional fees | | $ | 1,844,746 | | $ | 719,239 | ||
Salaries and benefits | |
| 742,320 | |
| 1,610,533 | ||
Non-cash stock based compensation | | | (1,473,085) | | | 273,222 | ||
Insurance expense | |
| 194,054 | |
| 212,783 | ||
Investor relations | |
| 289,527 | |
| 118,524 | ||
Other expenses | | | 174,024 | | | 239,081 | ||
Director fees and expense | |
| 142,500 | |
| 97,500 | ||
Facilities expense | | | 91,923 | | | 127,173 | ||
Sales and marketing | |
| 572,704 | |
| 169,377 | ||
Travel, lodging and meals | |
| 15,417 | |
| 161,659 | ||
Total general and administrative expenses | | $ | 2,594,130 | | $ | 3,729,091 | ||
The decrease in salaries and benefits was primarily due to the layoffs that occurred in the fourth quarter of 2024 after the termination of our CHAPERONE study and the slowing of commercial operations relating to our ophthalmology business in November 2024. The Company agreed to grant a fully vested RSU award to a senior executive upon his hire date in June 2025, which was subject to stockholder approval of an increase in the shares available for issuance under the Company’s equity compensation plan. Accordingly, the service inception date of the award preceded the grant date. The full fair value of the award was expensed in June and accrued at that time, but it was not formally granted until August 2025, at which time the Company was required to adjust the fair value to the new current fair value. Because the fair value of the award was lower at the grant date than the service inception date, there was a reversal of compensation expense in the third quarter. The increase in professional fees was primarily due to increased legal fees, consulting and other fees related to our treasury strategy, shareholder meeting and other corporate activities during the third quarter of 2025 which evaluation concluded with the initiation of our treasury strategy. The decrease in facilities expense was primarily due to the impairment of ROU assets in the fourth quarter of 2024, which lowered non-cash rent expense. The decrease in sales and marketing, and travel, lodging and meals was primarily due to our slowdown of commercial operations relating to our ophthalmology business in the fourth quarter of 2024.
Digital Assets
HYPE digital assets are initially recorded at cost and then subsequently remeasured at fair value as of the balance sheet date with changes in fair value recognized as unrealized gains or losses in operating income (expense). Upon derecognition of HYPE, the Company recognizes realized gains or losses in operating income (expense).
For the three months ended September 30, 2025, realized gains on HYPE digital tokens was $6.9 million, resulting from the conversion of HYPE to HiHYPE. Unrealized gains on HYPE digital tokens was $6.4 million, resulting from the fair value remeasurement of HYPE at September 30, 2025. Impairment loss on digital intangible assets was $6.3 million, resulting from the market price of HiHYPE falling below the carrying value.
There was no digital asset activity for the three months ended September 30, 2024.
31
Table of Contents
Other Income (Expense)
Other income (expense) for the three months ended September 30, 2025 totaled approximately $2.2 million of net other income, an increase of $2.8 million, compared to $0.6 million of net other expense for the three months ended September 30, 2024. Net other income for the three months ended September 30, 2025 primarily resulted from the extinguishment of a liability that was payable to Formosa. Net other expense for the three months ended September 30, 2024 primarily consisted of interest expense.
Results of Operations
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2025 Compared with Nine Months Ended September 30, 2024
Revenue and Cost of Revenue
Revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2025 totaled $317,226, partially offset by cost of revenues of $48. Revenues included $302,506, which was net staking revenue. As noted above, we present staking rewards and commission income as revenue on a net basis. Revenue from the ophthalmic business was $14,720.
Revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2024 totaled $29,243, offset by cost of revenues of $825,910. Write-down of inventories to net realizable value for the nine months ended September 30, 2024 totaled approximately $0.7 million. The $0.7 million was comprised primarily of a write-down of short-dated inventory to net realizable value during the nine month period.
Research and Development Expenses
Research and development expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2025 totaled $1.7 million, a decrease of $10.8 million, or 86%, compared to $12.5 million recorded for the nine months ended September 30, 2024. Research and development expenses consisted of the following:
| | | | | | |
| | For the Nine Months Ended September 30, | ||||
|
| 2025 |
| 2024 | ||
Salaries and benefits | | $ | 1,017,961 | | $ | 5,523,650 |
Direct clinical and non-clinical expenses | |
| 108,816 | |
| 2,641,136 |
Facilities expenses | |
| 178,187 | |
| 652,531 |
Non-cash stock based compensation expenses | |
| 348,022 | |
| 618,516 |
Supplies and materials | |
| 25,130 | |
| 1,812,674 |
Other expenses | | | 43,360 | | | 338,034 |
Depreciation expense | |
| — | |
| 914,172 |
Total research and development expenses | | $ | 1,721,476 | | $ | 12,500,713 |
The decrease in salaries and benefits and non-cash stock-based compensation was primarily due to the layoffs that occurred in the fourth quarter of 2024 after the termination of our CHAPERONE study and slowdown of our commercial operations relating to our ophthalmology business in November 2024. The decrease in direct clinical and non-clinical expenses and supplies and materials was primarily due to the termination of our CHAPERONE study. The decrease in facilities expense was primarily due the phase out of our Redwood City CA, and Reno NV, R&D and manufacturing locations over 2025, as we consolidated our focus to the development of the Optejet UFD to our Laguna Hills, CA facility and the impairment of right-of-use (ROU) assets in the fourth quarter of 2024, which lowered non-cash rent expense. The decrease in depreciation expense was primarily due to the full impairment of fixed assets that occurred in the fourth quarter of 2024.
32
Table of Contents
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
Selling, general and administrative expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2025 totaled $12.6 million, an increase of $1.5 million, or 14%, compared to $11.1 million recorded for the nine months ended September 30, 2024. General and administrative expenses consisted of the following:
| | | | | | |
|
| For the Nine Months Ended September 30, | ||||
| | 2025 |
| 2024 | ||
Professional fees | | $ | 4,018,171 | | $ | 2,248,900 |
Salaries and benefits | |
| 1,605,813 | |
| 4,594,448 |
Non-cash stock based compensation | | | 4,258,229 | | | 921,770 |
Insurance expense | |
| 617,510 | |
| 642,499 |
Investor relations | |
| 549,162 | |
| 347,148 |
Other expenses | | | 355,506 | | | 303,794 |
Director fees and expense | |
| 337,500 | |
| 311,250 |
Facilities expense | | | 258,342 | | | 376,127 |
FDA PDUFA fees | | | — | | | 361,091 |
Sales and marketing | |
| 609,791 | |
| 618,946 |
Travel, lodging and meals | |
| 35,132 | |
| 399,142 |
Total general and administrative expenses | | $ | 12,645,156 | | $ | 11,125,115 |
The decrease in salaries and benefits was primarily due to the layoffs that occurred in the fourth quarter of 2024 after the termination of our CHAPERONE study and slowdown of commercial operations relating to our ophthalmology business in November 2024. The increase in non-cash stock-based compensation primarily related to a fully vested inducement grant to a newly appointed executive. The increase in professional fees was primarily due to increased legal fees, consulting and other fees related to our evaluation of strategic alternatives, including the initiation of our treasury strategy. The decrease in facilities expense was primarily due to the impairment of ROU assets in the fourth quarter of 2024, which lowered non-cash rent expense. The decrease in sales and marketing, and travel, lodging and meals was primarily due to our termination of commercial operations in the fourth quarter of 2024 prior to the initiation of our treasury strategy in June.
Digital Assets
HYPE digital assets are initially recorded at cost and then subsequently remeasured at fair value as of the balance sheet date with changes in fair value recognized as unrealized gains or losses in operating income (expense). Upon derecognition of HYPE, the Company recognizes realized gains or losses in operating income (expense).
For the nine months ended September 30, 2025, realized gains on HYPE digital tokens was $6.9 million, resulting from the conversion of HYPE to HiHYPE. Unrealized gains on HYPE digital tokens was $6.4 million, resulting from the fair value remeasurement of HYPE at September 30, 2025. Impairment loss on digital intangible assets was $6.3 million, resulting from the market price of HiHYPE falling below the carrying value.
There was no digital asset activity for the nine months ended September 30, 2024.
Reacquisition of License Rights
Reacquisition of license rights for the nine months ended September 30, 2025 totaled $0, compared to $4.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2024. The $4.9 million is comprised of the aggregate $5.0 million of payments ($2.0 million of cash and $3.0 million settled in common stock) to Bausch + Lomb in connection with the reacquisition of a license (which we are recording as an operating expense), partially offset by $0.1 million related to the repurchase of equipment.
Other Income (Expense)
Other income (expense) for the nine months ended September 30, 2025 totaled approximately $1.4 million of net other income compared to $0.6 million of net other expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2024. Net other income for the nine months ended September 30, 2025 primarily consisted of approximately $2.2 million from the extinguishment of a liability due to Formosa, partially offset by $1.3 million of interest expense.
33
Table of Contents
Net other expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2024 primarily consisted of approximately $2.0 million of interest expense related to the Avenue loan, partially offset by $1.2 million of changes in fair value of equity consideration (the equity payable for the Bausch + Lomb and Formosa transactions) and $0.2 million of interest income, primarily from Treasury bills.
Liquidity and Going Concern
We measure our liquidity in a number of ways, including the following:
| | | | | | |
| | September 30, | | December 31, | ||
|
| 2025 |
| 2024 | ||
Cash and Cash Equivalents | | $ | 8,223,180 | | $ | 2,121,463 |
| | | | | | |
Working Capital (Deficit) | | $ | 5,048,675 | | $ | (13,279,008) |
| | | | | | |
Notes Payable (Gross) | | $ | 8,254,696 | | $ | 10,740,402 |
Cash Flow
Since inception, we have experienced negative cash flows from operations and our operations have primarily been funded by proceeds from equity and debt financings.
Our net losses were $5.5 million and $29.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024, respectively. As of September 30, 2025, we had an accumulated deficit of approximately $200.9 million. As of September 30, 2025, we had a cash and cash equivalents balance of $8.2 million, HYPE digital assets with a fair value of $38.0 million, digital intangible assets with a carrying value of $35.0 million, working capital of $5.0 million and stockholders’ equity of $70.8 million. As of September 30, 2025 and December 31, 2024, we had $8.3 million and $10.7 million, respectively, of gross notes payable outstanding.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024, our sources and uses of cash were as follows:
Net cash used in operating activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2025 was approximately $10.7 million, which includes cash used to fund a net loss of $5.5 million, plus $4.0 million of net non-cash items, plus $1.2 million of net cash used by changes in the levels of operating assets and liabilities. Net cash used in operating activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2024 was approximately $24.0 million, which includes cash used to fund a net loss of $29.9 million, reduced by $5.8 million of net non-cash expenses and $0.1 million of net cash used by changes in the levels of operating assets and liabilities.
Net cash used in investing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2025 was approximately $65.6 million, which was related to the purchase of HYPE digital assets. Cash used in investing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2024 was $0.2 million, which was related to purchases of property and equipment.
Net cash provided by financing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2025 totaled approximately $82.4 million, which was primarily attributable to $49.4 million of net proceeds from the sale of Series A Preferred Stock and warrants in the Private Placement, $30.0 million of net proceeds from the sale of common stock in our “at-the-market” offering and $4.8 million of net proceeds from the exercise of stock warrants partially offset by $1.5 million from the repayment of notes payable. Net cash provided by financing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2024 totaled approximately $16.5 million, which was primarily attributable to $14.2 million of net proceeds from the sale of common stock and warrants in a registered direct offering and $6.0 million of net proceeds from the sale of common stock in our “at-the-market” offering, partially offset by $3.8 million from the repayment of notes payable.
Contractual Obligations and Commitments
During the next twelve months we have commitments to pay (a) $3.5 million to settle our September 30, 2025 accounts payable, accrued expenses and other current liabilities, and (b) $0.5 million relating to our non-cancelable operating lease commitments.
After twelve months we have commitments to pay an additional $0.3 million relating to our non-cancelable operating lease commitments and $8.3 million of gross principal payments on the Avenue loan.
34
Table of Contents
Risks and Uncertainties
Our digital asset treasury reserve business is subject to a variety of risks as outlined in this report. In addition, the continuing worldwide implications of the war between Russia and Ukraine and the conflict in the Middle East and between India and Pakistan remain difficult to predict at this time. The imposition of sanctions on Russia by the United States and other countries and counter sanctions by Russia, and the resulting economic impacts on oil prices and other materials and goods, could affect the price of materials used in the manufacture of our product platform. If the price of materials used in the manufacturing of our product platform increase, that would adversely affect our business and the results of our operations.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
There are no off-balance sheet arrangements between us and any other entity that have, or are reasonably likely to have, a current or future effect on financial conditions, changes in financial conditions, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that is material to stockholders.
Critical Accounting Estimates
As described in Item 7 – Critical Accounting Estimates in the 2024 Form 10-K, as amended by the 2024 Form 10-K Amendment, we prepare our financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”), which require our management to make estimates that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the balance sheet dates, as well as the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. To the extent that there are material differences between these estimates and actual results, our financial condition or results of operations would be affected. We base our estimates on our own historical experience and other assumptions that we believe are reasonable after taking account of our circumstances and expectations for the future based on available information. We evaluate these estimates on an ongoing basis.
We consider an accounting estimate to be critical if: (i) the accounting estimate requires us to make assumptions about matters that were highly uncertain at the time the accounting estimate was made, and (ii) changes in the estimate that are reasonably likely to occur from period to period or use of different estimates that we reasonably could have used in the current period, would have a material impact on our financial condition or results of operations. There are items within our financial statements that require estimation but are not deemed critical, as defined above.
35
Table of Contents
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
Smaller reporting companies such as Hyperion DeFi, Inc. are not required to provide the information required by this Item.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures.
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial and accounting officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act.
In designing and evaluating our disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any disclosure controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives. In addition, the design of disclosure controls and procedures must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints and that management is required to apply its judgment in evaluating the benefits of possible controls and procedures relative to their costs.
Based on their evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial and accounting officer concluded that, as of September 30, 2025, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective to provide assurance at a reasonable level that the information we are required to disclose in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial and accounting officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures as of September 30, 2025, due to the existence of the following material weaknesses:
| ● | We failed to properly design and implement effective controls over the accounting for certain significant and complex, non-routine transactions and events. Specifically, the Company failed to properly account for the fair value of common equity shares issued in relation to the consideration for licensing agreements and debt modification. |
| ● | We failed to properly design and implement effective controls over identifying and recording impairments of ROU assets. Specifically, we determined that the controls designed to review and approve the impairment analysis for ROU assets were not adequately designed or operating effectively. This deficiency resulted from a lack of sufficient precision in our control activities to properly account for the impairment of ROU assets and to appropriately measure the impairment loss. |
A material weakness is a control deficiency or combination of control deficiencies, that results in more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.
Notwithstanding the existence of the material weaknesses as described above, we believe that the financial statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly present, in all material respects, our financial position, results of operations and cash flows as of the dates, and for the periods presented, in conformity with U.S. GAAP.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended September 30, 2025 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
36
Table of Contents
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings.
We are not currently a party to any material legal proceedings. From time to time, we may become involved in legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of our business. Regardless of outcome, litigation can have an adverse impact on us due to defense and settlement costs, diversion of management resources, negative publicity, reputational harm and other factors.
Item 1A. Risk Factors.
Except as set forth below, there have been no material changes to the risk factors set forth in Part I, Item 1A of the 2024 Form 10-K, as amended by the 2024 Form 10-K Amendment.
RISKS RELATED TO OUR HYPE TOKEN TREASURY STRATEGY
HYPE is a highly volatile asset, and fluctuations in the price and liquidity of HYPE may influence our financial results and the market price of our listed securities.
Our financial condition is substantially dependent on the market price and liquidity of HYPE tokens, which are subject to extreme volatility and limited trading venues. Substantially all of our treasury assets are concentrated in HYPE tokens, the native cryptocurrency of the Hyperliquid protocol. HYPE tokens have experienced significant price volatility, and our financial results will fluctuate materially based on HYPE token price movements. Unlike our previous cash and cash equivalent holdings, HYPE tokens cannot be readily converted to cash and are subject to significant liquidity constraints. We depend on the continued success and adoption of the Hyperliquid protocol for the value of our treasury holdings.
Our financial results and the market price of our listed securities would be adversely affected, and our business and financial condition would be negatively impacted, if the price of HYPE decreased substantially, including as a result of:
| ● | decreased user and investor confidence in HYPE, including due to the various factors described in this filing; |
| ● | investment and trading activities such as (i) trading activities of highly active retail and institutional users, speculators and investors or (ii) actual or expected significant dispositions of HYPE by large holders, including the expected liquidation of digital assets seized by governments or associated with entities that have filed for bankruptcy protection, or associated with tokens vested by the Hyperliquid core team; |
| ● | negative publicity, media or social media coverage, or sentiment due to events in or relating to, or perception of, HYPE, Hyperliquid or the broader digital assets industry; |
| ● | changes in consumer preferences and the perceived value or prospects of HYPE or the utility of Hyperliquid; |
| ● | competition from other decentralized exchanges or digital assets that exhibit comparable or better speed, security, scalability or energy efficiency, that feature other more favored characteristics, that are backed by governments, including the U.S. government, or reserves of fiat currencies, or that represent ownership or security interests in physical assets; |
| ● | a decrease in the price of other digital assets, to the extent the decrease in the price of such other digital assets may cause a decrease in the price of HYPE or adversely affect investor confidence in digital assets generally; |
| ● | developments relating to the Hyperliquid blockchain, including (i) changes to the Hyperliquid blockchain that impact its security, speed, scalability, usability or value, such as changes to the cryptographic security protocol underpinning the Hyperliquid blockchain, changes to the maximum number of HYPE outstanding, changes to the mutability of transactions, changes relating to the size of blockchain blocks, and similar changes; (ii) failures to make upgrades to the Hyperliquid blockchain and the Hyperliquid interface to adapt to security, technological, legal or other challenges; and (iii) changes to the Hyperliquid blockchain that introduce software bugs, security risks or other elements that adversely affect HYPE; |
| ● | disruptions, failures, unavailability, or interruptions in services of trading venues for HYPE; |
37
Table of Contents
| ● | the filing for bankruptcy protection by, liquidation of, or market concerns about the financial viability of digital asset custody infrastructure providers, trading venues, lending platforms, investment funds, or other digital asset industry participants; |
| ● | regulatory, legislative, enforcement and judicial actions that adversely affect access to, functionality of or performance of Hyperliquid and its associated products such as cryptocurrency perpetual futures, the price, ownership, transferability, trading volumes, legality or public perception of, HYPE or other L1 blockchains, or that adversely affect the operations of or otherwise prevent digital asset custody infrastructure providers, trading venues, lending platforms or other digital assets industry participants from accessing the Hyperliquid decentralized exchange and its associated products or operating in a manner that allows them to continue to deliver services to the digital assets industry; |
| ● | transaction congestion and fees associated with processing transactions on the Hyperliquid network; |
| ● | macroeconomic changes, such as changes in the level of interest rates and inflation, fiscal and monetary policies of governments, trade restrictions and fiat currency devaluations; |
| ● | developments in mathematics or technology, including in digital computing, algebraic geometry and quantum computing, that could result in the cryptography used by the Hyperliquid blockchain becoming insecure or ineffective; and |
| ● | changes in national and international economic and political conditions, including, without limitation, federal government policies, trade tariffs and trade disputes, and the adverse impacts attributable to global conflicts, including those between Russia and Ukraine and in the Middle East. |
Moreover, the price of our common stock has been and is likely to continue to be volatile, and with the adoption of our cryptocurrency treasury strategy, we have seen and expect to continue to see additional volatility in our stock price. In addition, if investors view the value of our listed securities as dependent upon or linked to the value or change in the value of our HYPE holdings, the price of HYPE may significantly influence the market price of our listed securities. The price of HYPE has historically been, and is likely to continue to be, volatile. Since December 4, 2024 (the first date for which public information of the HYPE token price is available at TradingView.com) through November 10, 2025, the token price of HYPE, based on the price reported by TradingView.com as of 23:59 p.m. UTC on each day, has ranged from as low as $10.26 (April 6, 2025) to as high as $58.60 (September 18, 2025).
HYPE faces unique technical, governance and concentration risks that could materially affect its long-term viability.
HYPE is a high-throughput Layer 1 blockchain with an architectural feature that differs significantly from other blockchains, such as Ethereum. While these features allow for rapid processing of transactions, they introduce risks that could adversely impact the value of HYPE and the stability of the HYPE network. HYPE has previously experienced a network outage that resulted in slow operations and user inability to close positions. If this kind of network outage were to recur, the confidence of the HYPE development community and its users could be adversely affected, which could cause a decline in the value of HYPE. Structural flaws could emerge that require a fork, which may have an adverse impact on the HYPE network and our holdings.
In addition, the concentration of validators on the Hyperliquid network presents centralization risks that could affect the security and value of our HYPE token holdings. The Hyperliquid blockchain currently operates with a limited number of validators (approximately 24 as of the date of this filing), which creates potential single points of failure. If these validators were to be compromised or act maliciously, it could result in network disruption, loss of funds, or other adverse effects that could materially impact the value of our HYPE token holdings.
HYPE is subject to technological obsolescence, including competition from emerging blockchain and artificial intelligence protocols, which could have a negative impact on the price of HYPE and adversely affect the value of our HYPE holdings.
The digital asset ecosystem is characterized by rapid technological innovation and evoluation, short development cycles, and intense competition among Layer 1 blockchains and related infrastructure providers. Numerous alternative cryptocurrencies, blockchains, and DeFi platforms are vying for market share in areas such as perpetual futures trading, staking, and on-chain liquidity provision, which are core to the Hyperliquid ecosystem and its HYPE token. As of October 31, 2025, HYPE was the eleventh largest digital asset by market capitalization, as tracked by CoinMarketCap.com, based on circulating market capitalization. As of October 31, 2025, the digital assets tracked by CoinMarketCap.com had a total market capitalization of approximately $3.41 trillion (including the
38
Table of Contents
approximately $14.3 billion market cap of HYPE, based on circulating market capitalization), as calculated using market prices and total available supply of each digital asset.
HYPE faces competition from a wide range of digital assets, including Bitcoin and Ether, and from existing protocols, such as Aptos and Sei, as well as new entrants that are currently being developed. Many consortiums and financial institutions are also researching and investing resources into private or permissioned blockchain platforms rather than open platforms like the Hyperliquid network. As 99% of Hyperliquid’s revenues are currently allocated to the Assistance Fund for the repurchase of HYPE tokens, a decline in revenue could have a material impact on the demand for HYPE tokens. In addition, HYPE is supported by fewer trading platforms than more established digital assets, such as Bitcoin and Ether, which could impact its liquidity. Further, the Hyperliquid network is in direct competition with other smart contract platforms, such as the Ethereum, Solana, Polkadot, Avalanche and Cardano networks. Competition from the emergence or growth of alternative digital assets or other smart contract platforms could have a negative impact on the demand for, and price of, HYPE, and thereby adversely affect the value of our HYPE holdings.
Competitors may offer superior scalability, security, interoperability, decentralization, programmability and adoption, and may attract developers away from the HYPE ecosystem. Advancements in AI and blockchain technology are likely to accelerate the development of such protocols, including the development of additional networks that natively integrate AI into consensus mechanisms and other core features. If HYPE is unable to evolve to address such increased competition or if Layer 2 networks believe that HYPE’s core technology stack is outdated or less attractive compared with other Layer 1 networks, HYPE may be considered technologically obsolete by the next generation of protocols. Any decline in the HYPE network would materially impact the market value of HYPE and adversely affect the value of our HYPE treasury holdings and our stock price.
Investors may also invest in HYPE through means other than our securities, including through direct investments in HYPE and other financial vehicles, including securities backed by or linked to HYPE and digital asset treasury companies similar to us. Market and financial conditions, and other conditions beyond our control, may make it more attractive to gain exposure to HYPE through other vehicles, rather than our securities.
Proof-of-stake blockchains are a relatively recent innovation, and have not been subject to as widespread use or adoption over as long of a period of time as traditional proof-of-work blockchains.
Certain digital assets, such as Bitcoin, use a “proof-of-work” consensus algorithm. The genesis block on the Bitcoin blockchain was mined in 2009, and Bitcoin’s blockchain has been in operation since then. Many newer blockchains enabling smart contract functionality use a newer consensus algorithm known as “proof-of-stake.” While their proponents believe that they may have certain advantages, the “proof-of-stake” consensus mechanisms and governance systems underlying many newer blockchain protocols, including the Hyperliquid network, and their associated digital assets – including our HYPE holdings – have not been tested at scale over as long of a period of time or subject to as widespread use or adoption as, for example, Bitcoin’s proof-of-work consensus mechanism has. This could lead to these blockchains, and their associated digital assets, having undetected vulnerabilities, structural design flaws, suboptimal incentive structures for network participants (e.g., validators), technical disruptions, or a wide variety of other problems, any of which could cause these blockchains not to function as intended, lead to outright failure to function entirely causing a total outage or disruption of network activity, or to suffer other operational problems or reputational damage, leading to a loss of users or adoption or a loss in value of the associated digital assets, including our HYPE holdings. Over the long term, there can be no assurance that the proof-of-stake blockchain on which our HYPE holdings rely will achieve widespread scale or adoption or perform successfully; any failure to do so could negatively impact the price of HYPE and the value of our HYPE holdings.
The concentration of our HYPE holdings could enhance the risks inherent in our HYPE treasury strategy.
The concentration of our HYPE holdings limits the risk mitigation that we could achieve if we were to purchase a more diversified portfolio of treasury assets, and the absence of diversification enhances the risks inherent in our HYPE treasury strategy. Any future significant declines in the price of HYPE would have a more pronounced impact on our financial condition than if we used our cash to purchase a more diverse portfolio of assets.
The emergence or growth of other digital assets, including those with significant private or public sector backing, could have a negative impact on the price of HYPE and adversely affect our business.
As a result of our HYPE treasury strategy, our assets are concentrated in our HYPE holdings. Accordingly, the emergence or growth of digital assets other than HYPE may have a material adverse effect on our financial condition. There are numerous alternative digital assets and many entities, including consortiums and financial institutions, that are researching and investing resources into private
39
Table of Contents
or permissioned blockchain platforms or digital assets that do not use proof-of-stake consensus mechanism like the Hyperliquid network, or use different technical innovations that build upon or improve the proof-of-stake consensus mechanism. For example, in late 2022, the Ethereum network transitioned to a “proof-of-stake” mechanism for validating transactions that requires significantly less computing power than proof-of-work mining. The Ethereum network has completed another major upgrade since then and may undertake additional upgrades in the future. If the mechanisms for validating transactions in Ethereum and other alternative digital assets are perceived as superior to proof-of-stake, those digital assets could gain market share relative to HYPE.
We plan to use a portion of our capital raised that is not required to provide working capital for our ongoing operations to invest in HYPE, which may adversely affect our financial results and the market price of our securities.
We plan to use a portion of our capital raised that is not required to provide working capital for our ongoing operations to invest in HYPE. The price of HYPE has been subject to significant price fluctuations and is highly volatile. Moreover, digital assets are relatively novel, and the application of securities laws and other regulations to such assets is unclear in many respects. It is possible that regulators may interpret laws in a manner that adversely affects the liquidity or value of our HYPE holdings.
Any increase or decrease in the fair value of HYPE will require us to recognize unrealized gains or losses, which could be material to our financial results for the applicable reporting period, which may create significant volatility in our reported earnings. Any decrease in reported earnings or increased volatility of such earnings could have a material adverse effect on the market price of our securities. In addition, the application of generally accepted accounting principles in the United States with respect to digital assets remains uncertain in some respects, and any future changes in the manner in which we account for our HYPE holdings could have a material adverse effect on our financial results and the market price of our securities.
In addition, if investors view the value of our securities as dependent upon or linked to the value or change in the value of our HYPE holdings, the price of such digital assets may significantly influence the market price of our securities.
Our digital asset holdings are less liquid than our existing cash and cash equivalents and may not be able to serve as a source of liquidity for us to the same extent as cash and cash equivalents. We are also subject to the credit risk of custodians.
Historically, crypto markets have been characterized by significant volatility in price, limited liquidity and trading volumes compared to sovereign currencies markets, relative anonymity, a developing regulatory landscape, potential susceptibility to market abuse and manipulation, compliance and internal control failures at exchanges, and various other risks inherent in their entirely electronic, virtual form and decentralized network. During times of market instability, we may not be able to sell our digital asset holdings at favorable prices or at all. Further, we use custody infrastructure providers and transact with trade execution partners. Currently, we do not deposit our digital assets directly with a custodian but instead use a self-custody approach using infrastructure provided by a custodian. These entities do not have the same protections as are available to cash or securities deposited with or transacted by institutions subject to regulation. For example, U.S. banks are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) up to $250,000 per depositor in the case of the bank’s insolvency. U.S. broker-dealers are covered by the Securities Investor Protection Corporation (“SIPC”), which ensures recovery of the securities by the depositor. In contrast, cryptocurrency custody infrastructure providers do not offer such protections. If such a provider were to become insolvent, it is possible that we could face delays or difficulties with respect to the management of our digital assets.
Apart from the risk of insolvency of the custody infrastructure provider, there is also a risk of custodians freezing withdrawals, typically in connection with a security incident, regulatory compliance or technical issues, and may be unresponsive to customers attempting to retrieve their funds. In such events, it may be difficult to reach a representative to assist with unfreezing assets and we may not be able to sell or use our digital assets.
Additionally, the secondary market for borrowing against digital assets is not well developed. We may be unable to enter into term loans or other capital raising transactions collateralized by our unencumbered digital assets or otherwise generate funds using our digital assets, especially during times of market instability or when the price of digital assets has declined significantly. If we are unable to sell our digital assets, enter into additional capital raising transactions using digital assets as collateral, or otherwise generate funds using our digital assets or if we are forced to sell our digital assets at a significant loss in order to meet our working capital requirements, our business and financial condition could be negatively impacted.
40
Table of Contents
Competition from central bank digital currencies (“CBDCs”) and emerging payments initiatives involving financial institutions could adversely affect the price of HYPE and other digital assets.
Central banks in various countries have introduced digital forms of legal tender (“CBDCs”). China’s CBDC project, known as Digital Currency Electronic Payment, has reportedly been tested in a live pilot program conducted in multiple cities in China. Central banks representing at least 130 countries have published retail or wholesale CBDC work ranging from research to pilot projects. Whether or not they incorporate blockchain or similar technology, CBDCs, as legal tender in the issuing jurisdiction, could have an advantage in competing with, or replace, HYPE and other cryptocurrencies as a medium of exchange or store of value. Central banks and other governmental entities have also announced cooperative initiatives and consortia with private sector entities, with the goal of leveraging blockchain and other technology to reduce friction in cross-border and interbank payments and settlement, and commercial banks and other financial institutions have also recently announced a number of initiatives of their own to incorporate new technologies, including blockchain and similar technologies, into their payments and settlement activities, which could compete with, or reduce the demand for, HYPE. As a result of any of the foregoing factors, the price of HYPE could decrease, which could adversely affect the value of our HYPE holdings.
The Company’s liquid staking activities, including its holdings of HiHYPE (an intangible digital asset), expose the Company to additional risks and earnings volatility.
Hyperion Institutional HYPE (“HiHYPE”) is a liquid staking token (“LST”) designed by Kinetiq to enable the Company to access HyperEVM DeFi. HiHYPE evidences ownership of the Company’s deposited HYPE, the underlying digital asset of HiHYPE, in a segregated, whitelisted, KYB/AML-compliant address, and automatically accrues staking rewards. Liquid staking allows the Company to earn native staking rewards while maintaining access to liquidity on its digital assets that can be used for additional strategies on- and off-chain.
The risks involved with liquid staking differ from direct staking, including the following:
| ● | Liquid staking requires a certain level of technical expertise to manage the staking and un-staking process effectively. There is associated counterparty risk tied to the reliance on using the liquid staking provider’s smart contract platform. |
| ● | Disputes or compromise among the liquid staking provider’s core team may lead to the value of staking assets diverging from HYPE or failure to exit the liquid staking position. |
| ● | The price of the staked derivative may decrease from its original price. This may happen because the new token has a lower market price. |
| ● | If we lose our liquid staking token, we will also lose access to our staked token. This can result from liquidations at lending protocols or other execution partners, the loss of private keys or other forms of access to the addresses that hold our LST, and mistaken or stolen asset transfers. |
The Hyperliquid network is based upon the development and deployment of smart contracts, which are self-executing contracts with the terms of the agreement written into software code. Like any software code, smart contracts are exposed to risk that the code contains a bug or other security vulnerability, which can lead to loss of assets that are held on or transacted through the contract. The smart contract is deployed on Hyperliquid and, as such, may contain a bug or other vulnerability that may lead to the loss of, or inability to access, digital assets held in the smart contract. The Company currently relies on Kinetiq for its liquid staking solution. The smart contract code written by Kinetiq was audited by Code4rena, Spearbit, Pashov Audit Group, and Zenith. Nevertheless, there is no guaranty against a bug or other vulnerability leading to a loss of digital assets.
In addition, the Company is also exposed to risk of losing HYPE in the pool due to system failure or hacking. As a result, HiHYPE tokens do not confer an enforceable right to the underlying HYPE tokens, but only a claim. Further, the redemption of HiHYPE tokens back into the underlying HYPE tokens may be subject to any protocol-defined lockup or unbonding periods.
HiHYPE tokens are initially recognized at the fair value of the HYPE tokens exchanged and, due to their indefinite useful life, are not amortized but instead are subject to impairment testing. In contrast, HYPE is measured at fair value. The variances in valuation methods between HYPE and HiHYPE may create material volatility in the financial statements depending on conversion and redemption activity between HYPE and HiHYPE each period. In addition, any staking rewards earned on HiHYPE are not recognized until HiHYPE tokens are redeemed.
41
Table of Contents
REGULATORY RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH OUR STRATEGY
HYPE, the Hyperliquid network and other digital assets are novel and are subject to significant legal and regulatory uncertainty.
HYPE and other digital assets are relatively novel, have not been in existence for an extended period of time, and are subject to significant uncertainty, which could adversely impact their price. The application of state and federal securities laws and other laws and regulations to digital assets is unclear in certain respects, and it is possible that regulators in the United States or foreign countries may interpret or apply existing laws and regulations in a manner that adversely affects the price of HYPE or the ability of individuals or institutions such as us to own or transfer HYPE.
The U.S. federal government, states, regulatory agencies, and foreign countries may also enact new laws and regulations, or pursue regulatory, legislative, enforcement or judicial actions, that could materially impact the price of HYPE or the ability of individuals or institutions such as us to own or transfer HYPE. For example, within the past several years:
| ● | President Trump signed an Executive Order instructing a working group comprised of representatives from key federal agencies to evaluate measures that can be taken to provide regulatory clarity and certainty built on technology-neutral regulations for individuals and firms involved in digital assets, including through well-defined jurisdictional regulatory boundaries. This area continues to evolve and additional regulations are likely to be issued in the future, the effect of which cannot be predicted at this time; |
| ● | in January 2025, the SEC announced the formation of a “Crypto Task Force,” which was created to provide clarity on the application of the federal securities laws to the crypto asset market and to recommend policy measures with respect to digital asset security status, registration and listing of digital asset-based investment vehicles, and digital asset custody, lending and staking; |
| ● | in November 2023, Binance Holdings Ltd. (“Binance”) and its then chief executive officer reached a settlement with the U.S. Department of Justice, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, the U.S. Department of Treasury’s Office of Foreign Asset Control, and the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network to resolve a multi-year investigation by the agencies and a civil suit brought by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, pursuant to which Binance agreed to, among other things, pay $4.3 billion in penalties across the four agencies and to discontinue its operations in the United States; |
| ● | in November 2023, the SEC filed a complaint against Payward Inc. and Payward Ventures Inc., together known as Kraken, alleging, among other claims, that Kraken’s crypto trading platform was operating as an unregistered securities exchange, broker, dealer and clearing agency; |
| ● | in June 2023, the SEC filed complaints against Binance and Coinbase, Inc. (“Coinbase”), and their respective affiliated entities, relating to, among other claims, assertions that each party was operating as an unregistered securities exchange, broker, dealer and clearing agency; |
| ● | the European Union adopted Markets in Crypto Assets Regulation, a comprehensive digital asset regulatory framework for the issuance and use of digital assets, like bitcoin; |
| ● | in June 2023, the United Kingdom adopted and implemented the Financial Services and Markets Act 2023, which regulates market activities in “cryptoassets;” and |
| ● | in China, the People’s Bank of China and the National Development and Reform Commission have outlawed cryptocurrency mining and declared all cryptocurrency transactions illegal within the country. |
While the complaint against Coinbase was dismissed in February 2025, the complaint against Payward Inc. and Payward Ventures Inc. was dismissed with prejudice in March 2025, and the complaint against Binance was dismissed on May 29, 2025, the SEC or other regulatory agencies may initiate similar actions in the future, which could materially impact the price of HYPE and our ability to own or transfer HYPE.
It is not possible to predict whether or when new laws will be enacted that change the legal framework governing digital assets or provide additional authorities to the SEC or other regulators, or whether or when any other federal, state or foreign legislative bodies
42
Table of Contents
will take any similar actions. It is also not possible to predict the nature of any such additional laws or authorities, how additional legislation or regulatory oversight might impact the ability of digital asset markets to function, the willingness of financial and other institutions to continue to provide services to the digital assets industry, or how any new laws or regulations, or changes to existing laws or regulations, might impact the value of digital assets generally and HYPE specifically. The consequences of any new law or regulation relating to digital assets and digital asset activities could adversely affect the market price of HYPE, as well as our ability to hold or transact in HYPE, and in turn adversely affect the market price of our listed securities.
Our HYPE treasury strategy subjects us to enhanced regulatory oversight.
There has been increasing focus on the extent to which digital assets can be used to launder the proceeds of illegal activities, fund criminal or terrorist activities, or circumvent sanctions regimes, including those sanctions imposed in response to the ongoing conflict between Russia and Ukraine. While we have implemented and maintain policies and procedures reasonably designed to promote compliance with applicable anti-money laundering and sanctions laws and regulations and take care to only acquire our HYPE through entities subject to anti-money laundering regulation and related compliance rules in the United States, and are considering onboarding a chief compliance officer, if we are found to have purchased any of our HYPE from bad actors that have used HYPE to launder money or persons subject to sanctions, we may be subject to regulatory proceedings and any further transactions or dealings in HYPE by us may be restricted or prohibited.
A portion of our HYPE holdings may serve as collateral securing our outstanding indebtedness, and we may incur additional indebtedness or enter into other financial instruments in the future that may be collateralized by our HYPE holdings. We may also consider pursuing strategies to create income streams or otherwise generate funds using our HYPE holdings. These types of HYPE-related transactions are the subject of enhanced regulatory oversight. These and any other HYPE-related transactions we may enter into, beyond simply acquiring and holding HYPE, may subject us to additional regulatory compliance requirements and scrutiny, including under federal and state money services regulations, money transmitter licensing requirements and various commodity and securities laws and regulations.
Additional laws, guidance and policies may be issued by domestic and foreign regulators following the filing for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection by FTX, one of the world’s largest cryptocurrency exchanges, in November 2022. The FTX collapse may have increased regulatory focus on the digital assets industry. Increased enforcement activity and changes in the regulatory environment, including changing interpretations and the implementation of new or varying regulatory requirements by the government or any new legislation affecting HYPE, as well as enforcement actions involving or impacting our trading venues, counterparties and custody infrastructure providers, may impose significant costs or significantly limit our ability to hold and transact in HYPE. However, it is important to note that Hyperliquid—the exchange to which HYPE is native—is intended to be more decentralized than FTX, such that a single entity is unlikely to exert complete control over the entire system. For example, unlike FTX when it filed for bankruptcy protection, Hyperliquid’s assets are custodied on-chain (not centrally by a single entity), order matching on Hyperliquid occurs transparently via on-chain mechanisms (not fully off-chain), Hyperliquid is governed by a set of approximately 24 validators (not a single individual), and Hyperliquid’s on-chain states (e.g., positions, collateral, and funding rates) are publicly available such that uysers can audit the system.
In addition, private actors that are wary of HYPE or the regulatory concerns associated with HYPE have in the past taken and may in the future take further actions that may have an adverse effect on our business or the market price of our listed securities. For example, it is possible that a financial institution could restrict customers from buying our securities if it were to determine that the value of our securities is closely tied to the performance of HYPE, signaling a reluctance to facilitate exposure to virtual currencies.
Absent federal regulations, there is a possibility that HYPE may be classified as a “security.” Any classification of HYPE as a “security” would subject us to additional regulation and could materially and adversely impact the operation of our business.
If HYPE were classified as a “security” for purposes of the U.S. federal securities laws, our business would become subject to additional regulation, including a requirement to register as an investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “Investment Company Act”). To date, neither the SEC nor any other U.S. federal or state regulator has publicly stated whether they believe that HYPE should be classified as a “security.” Despite the Executive Order titled “Strengthening American Leadership in Digital Financial Technology,” which includes as an objective, “protecting and promoting the ability of individual citizens and private sector entities alike to access and … to maintain self-custody of digital assets,” there is no authoritative framework for determining with certainty whether HYPE is or is not a “security” for purposes of the U.S. federal securities laws, and no action has been taken by any regulator in the United States regarding such determination. For the reasons discussed below, we believe that HYPE should not be classified as a “security,” and, as a result, we do not believe the Company is required to register as an investment company under the
43
Table of Contents
Investment Company Act. However, because of the lack of any current authoritative framework for analyzing the issue, it is possible that the SEC or another regulatory body or federal court could determine that HYPE is a security. Our belief, even if reasonable under the circumstances, would not preclude legal or regulatory action based on such a finding that HYPE is a “security,” including a requirement to register as an investment company under the Investment Company Act. If we were required to register as an investment company, we expect we would need to make fundamental changes to our business model, strategy, operations and assets.
We have implemented a process for analyzing the U.S. federal securities law status of HYPE and other cryptocurrencies as guidance and case law continue to evolve. As part of this process, we take into account a number of factors, including the various definitions of what constitutes a “security” under U.S. federal securities laws and federal court decisions interpreting the elements of these definitions, such as the U.S. Supreme Court’s decisions in the Howey and Reves cases, as well as court rulings, regulatory reports, orders, press releases, public statements, and speeches by the SEC Commissioners and SEC Staff providing guidance on when a digital asset or a transaction to which a digital asset may relate may be a security for purposes of U.S. federal securities laws. Recently, the SEC announced “Project Crypto” which is expected to result in rulemakings and/or other authoritative guidance on how to determine whether digital assets are or are not “securities” for purposes of U.S. federal securities laws. Public statements by Chairman Atkins suggest that the SEC is considering a regulatory framework that will offer substantial flexibility to determine that digital assets are not securities. Further, it appears that the current United States Congress is inclined towards increased flexibility regarding the regulatory treatment of digital assets. We expect this area of regulation will develop rapidly during this Administration, and we plan to continually monitor developments in this area as they evolve. Our position that HYPE is not a “security” is premised, in part, on our conclusion that HYPE does not meet the elements of the Howey test. Among the reasons for our conclusion that HYPE is not a security is that holders of HYPE do not have a reasonable expectation of profits from the efforts of Hyperliquid, the Hyperliquid Foundation or any other person, entity or group of persons in respect of their holding of HYPE. HYPE’s value does not primarily derive from the efforts of a centralized “manager” because Hyperliquid is structured around validator governance rather than a single operating entity. Relatedly, token holders are not passive investors; rather, they have the ability to directly influence governance decisions, staking incentives, and validator participation. Consistent with this analysis, we note that Hyperliquid’s founding team has stated a clear goal of “full decentralization” in both validator distribution and protocol governance, signaling an intent to eliminate all vestiges of centralized managerial reliance. Also, HYPE ownership does not guarantee the right to receive any interest, rewards, or other returns. While we recognize that any new regulatory framework for digital assets promulgated by the SEC may not be based on the elements of the Howey test, we believe more generally that HYPE does not otherwise have the characteristics of a “security” for purposes of the U.S. federal securities laws. The views of the SEC and other regulators, and the United States Congress, regarding the proper classification of HYPE and other digital assets may evolve over time, based in part on assessments of a multitude of factors over which we have no control. Application of securities laws to the specific facts and circumstances of digital assets is complex and subject to change. Our conclusion that HYPE should not be classified as a security, even if reasonable under the circumstances, would not preclude legal or regulatory action based on a finding that HYPE, or any other digital asset we might hold is a “security.” If HYPE is alleged or ultimately determined to be a security, the viability of Hyperliquid, HYPE and our own business model would be materially and adversely affected. In such event, we would likely be required to register as an investment company under the Investment Company Act, and would also be at risk of enforcement proceedings and lawsuits against us, which could result in potential injunctions, cease-and-desist orders, fines and penalties. Such developments would adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial condition, and prospects.
If we were deemed to be an investment company under the Investment Company Act, applicable restrictions likely would make it impractical for us to continue segments of our business as currently contemplated.
Under Sections 3(a)(1)(A) and (C) of the Investment Company Act, a company generally will be deemed to be an “investment company” if (i) it is or holds itself out as being engaged primarily, or proposes to engage primarily, in the business of investing, reinvesting, or trading in securities or (ii) it engages or proposes to engage in the business of investing, reinvesting, owning, holding, or trading in securities, and it owns or proposes to acquire investment securities having a value exceeding 40% of the value of its total assets (exclusive of U.S. government securities and cash items) on an unconsolidated basis. Rule 3a-1 under the Investment Company Act generally provides that notwithstanding the test described in clause (ii) in the previous sentence, an entity will not be deemed to be an “investment company” for purposes of the Investment Company Act if no more than 45% of the value of its assets (exclusive of U.S. government securities and cash items) consists of, and no more than 45% of its net income after taxes (for the last four fiscal quarters combined) is derived from, securities other than U.S. government securities, securities issued by employees’ securities companies, securities issued by qualifying majority owned subsidiaries of such entity, and securities issued by qualifying companies that are controlled primarily by such entity.
We do not believe that we are an “investment company” as such term is defined in either Section 3(a)(1)(A) or Section 3(a)(1)(C) of the Investment Company Act since we believe HYPE is not an investment security. With respect to Section 3(a)(1)(A), we do not hold ourselves out as being engaged primarily or propose to engage primarily in the business of investing, reinvesting, or
44
Table of Contents
trading in securities within the meaning of such section. With respect to Section 3(a)(1)(C), we believe we satisfy the elements of Rule 3a-1 and therefore are deemed not to be an investment company under, and we intend to conduct our operations such that we will not be deemed an investment company under, Section 3(a)(1)(C).
HYPE and other digital assets, as well as new business models and transactions enabled by blockchain technologies, present novel interpretive questions under the Investment Company Act. There is a risk that assets or arrangements that we have concluded are not securities could be deemed to be securities by the SEC or another authority for purposes of the Investment Company Act, which would increase the percentage of securities held by us for Investment Company Act purposes. The SEC has requested information from a number of participants in the digital assets’ ecosystem, regarding the potential application of the Investment Company Act to their businesses. For example, in an action unrelated to the Company, in February 2022, the SEC issued a cease-and-desist order under the Investment Company Act to BlockFi Lending LLC (“BlockFi”), in which the SEC alleged that BlockFi was operating as an unregistered investment company because it issued securities and also held more than 40% of its total assets, excluding cash, in investment securities, including the loans of digital assets made by BlockFi to institutional borrowers.
If we were deemed to be an investment company, Rule 3a-2 under the Investment Company Act is a safe harbor that provides a one-year grace period for transient investment companies that have a bona fide intent to be engaged primarily, as soon as is reasonably possible (in any event by the termination of such one-year period), in a business other than that of investing, reinvesting, owning, holding or trading in securities, with such intent evidenced by the company’s business activities and an appropriate resolution of its board of directors. The grace period is available not more than once every three years and runs from the earlier of (i) the date on which the issuer owns securities and/or cash having a value exceeding 50% of the issuer’s total assets on either a consolidated or unconsolidated basis or (ii) the date on which the issuer owns or proposes to acquire investment securities having a value exceeding 40% of the value of such issuer’s total assets (exclusive of U.S. government securities and cash items) on an unconsolidated basis. Accordingly, the grace period may not be available at the time that we seek to rely on Rule 3a-2; however, Rule 3a-2 is a safe harbor and we may rely on any exemption or exclusion from investment company status available to us under the Investment Company Act at any given time. Furthermore, reliance on Rule 3a-2, Section 3(a)(1)(C), or Rule 3a-1 could require us to take actions to dispose of securities, limit our ability to make certain investments or enter into joint ventures, or otherwise limit or change our service offerings and operations. If we were to be deemed an investment company in the future, restrictions imposed by the Investment Company Act — including limitations on our ability to issue different classes of stock and equity compensation to directors, officers, and employees and restrictions on management, operations, and transactions with affiliated persons — likely would make it impractical for us to continue our business as contemplated, and could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition, and prospects. Investment companies in the United States that are not registered under Section 8 of the Investment Company Act (as we are not), and which are not exempt from such registration, are generally prohibited from engaging in interstate commerce, and the contracts entered into by such companies are generally unenforceable.
We are not subject to the legal and regulatory obligations that apply to investment companies such as mutual funds and funds, or to obligations applicable to investment advisers.
Mutual funds, exchange-traded funds and their directors and management are subject to extensive regulation as investment companies and investment advisers under U.S. federal and state law; this regulation is intended for the benefit and protection of investors. We are not subject to, and do not otherwise voluntarily comply with, these laws and regulations. This means, among other things, that the execution of or changes to our treasury reserve policy or our HYPE strategy, our use of leverage, the manner in which our HYPE is custodied, our ability to engage in transactions with affiliated parties and our operating and investment activities generally are not subject to the extensive legal and regulatory requirements and prohibitions that apply to investment companies and investment advisers. For example, although a significant change to our treasury reserve policy would require the approval of our board of directors, no stockholder or regulatory approval would be necessary. Consequently, our board of directors has broad discretion over the investment, leverage and cash management policies it authorizes, whether in respect of our HYPE or other activities we may pursue, and has the power to change our current policies, including our strategy of acquiring and holding HYPE. As a result, investors in our company may be exposed to greater volatility, concentration risk and governance discretion than they would be if we were subject to the protections afforded to regulated investment vehicles.
45
Table of Contents
TECHNOLOGICAL AND OPERATIONAL RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH OUR STRATEGY
HYPE is created and transmitted through the operations of the peer-to-peer Hyperliquid network, a decentralized network of computers running software following the HYPE protocol. If the Hyperliquid network is disrupted or encounters any unanticipated difficulties, the value of HYPE could be negatively impacted.
If the Hyperliquid network is disrupted or encounters any unanticipated difficulties, then the processing of transactions on the Hyperliquid network may be disrupted, which in turn may prevent us from depositing or withdrawing HYPE from our wallet addresses or otherwise effecting HYPE transactions. Such disruptions could include, for example: the price volatility of HYPE; the insolvency, business failure, interruption, default, failure to perform, security breach, or other problems of participants, custodians or others; the closing of HYPE trading platforms due to fraud, failures, security breaches or otherwise; or network outages or congestion, power outages, or other problems or disruptions affecting the Hyperliquid network. For example, in June 2025, after a trader allegedly manipulated the price of JELLY in a Hyperliquid vault market, Hyperliquid forcibly closed the market at a very low price to minimize losses. Hyperliquid’s intervention raised questions as to whether the platform is truly decentralized.
In addition, digital asset validating operations can consume significant amounts of electricity, which may have a negative environmental impact and give rise to public opinion against allowing, or government regulations restricting, the use of electricity for validating operations. Additionally, validators may be forced to cease operations during an electricity shortage or power outage.
We face risks relating to the custody of our HYPE, including the loss or destruction of private keys required to access our HYPE and cyberattacks or other data loss relating to our HYPE, including smart contract related losses and vulnerabilities.
We hold our HYPE in self-custodied wallet addresses, using infrastructure provided by regulated custodians, including Anchorage Digital Bank, as well as hardware wallet providers. Our custodial services contracts do not restrict our ability to reallocate our HYPE among our wallet addresses, and our HYPE holdings may be concentrated with a single custodian from time to time. In light of the significant amount of HYPE that we hold, we expect to continually seek to engage additional custody infrastructure providers to achieve a greater degree of diversification in the custody of our HYPE as the extent of potential risk of loss is dependent, in part, on the degree of diversification. However, multiple custody infrastructure providers may utilize similar wallet infrastructure, cloud service providers or software systems, which could increase systemic technology risk. While we will conduct due diligence on our custody infrastructure providers and any smart contract platforms we may use, there can be no assurance that such diligence will uncover all risks, including operational deficiencies, hidden vulnerabilities or legal noncompliance.
The digital assets held by us are not insured. The market for such insurance is in the early stages. Further, banking institutions will not accept our digital assets and they are therefore not insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) or the Securities Investor Protection Corporation (“SIPC”). Therefore, a loss may be suffered with respect to our digital assets which is not covered by insurance and we may not be able to recover any of our carried value in these digital assets if they are lost or stolen or suffer significant and sustained reduction in conversion spot price. If we are not otherwise able to recover damages from a malicious actor in connection with these losses, our business and results of operations may suffer, which may have a material negative impact on our share price. The limited rights of legal recourse available to us and our lack of insurance protection for risk of loss of our digital assets exposes us and our shareholders to the risk of loss of our digital assets for which no person may ultimately be held liable and we may not be able to recover our losses. Any uninsured losses may have an adverse effect on our results of operations and/or financial condition.
To the extent that we obtain insurance to cover losses of our HYPE holdings in the future, such insurance may cover none or only a small fraction of the value of the entirety of our HYPE holdings. Any loss associated with any insolvency proceedings is unlikely to be covered by any insurance coverage we may obtain in the future related to our HYPE. The legal framework governing digital asset ownership and rights in custodial or insolvency contexts remains uncertain and continues to evolve, which could result in unexpected losses, protracted recovery processes or adverse treatment in insolvency proceedings.
HYPE is controllable only by the possessor of both the unique public key and private key(s) relating to the local or online digital wallet in which the HYPE is held. While the L1 blockchain ledger requires a public key relating to a digital wallet to be published when used in a transaction, private keys must be safeguarded and kept private in order to prevent a third party from accessing the HYPE held in such wallet. To the extent the private key(s) for a digital wallet are lost, destroyed, or otherwise compromised and no backup of the private key(s) is accessible, neither we nor our custody infrastructure providers will be able to access the HYPE held in the related digital wallet. Furthermore, we cannot provide assurance that our digital wallets, nor the digital wallets of our custody infrastructure providers, will not be compromised as a result of a cyberattack. The HYPE and blockchain ledger, as well as other digital assets and blockchain technologies, have been, and may in the future be, subject to security breaches, cyberattacks or other malicious activities.
46
Table of Contents
As part of our treasury management strategy, we may engage in staking, restaking, or other permitted activities that involve the use of “smart contracts” or decentralized applications. The use of smart contracts or decentralized applications entails certain risks including risks stemming from the existence of an “admin key” or coding flaws that could be exploited, potentially allowing a bad actor to issue or otherwise compromise the smart contract or decentralized application, potentially leading to a loss of our HYPE. Like all software code, smart contracts are exposed to risk that the code contains a bug or other security vulnerability, which can lead to loss of assets that are held on or transacted through the contract or decentralized application. Smart contracts and decentralized applications may contain bugs, security vulnerabilities or poorly designed permission structures that could result in the irreversible loss of HYPE or other digital assets. Exploits, including those stemming from admin key misuse, admin key compromise, or protocol flaws, have occurred in the past and may occur in the future.
We are exposed to slashing risks.
Our participation in on-chain activities related to validating and DeFi partnerships, such as our HYPE Asset Use Service, exposes the company to slashing risk, which may result in partial loss of staked digital assets. Slashing may occur due to validator misbehavior, software flaws, operational mistakes, or changes to network governance, with tokens permanently forfeited and not recoverable. Such losses could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and reputation. While we seek to mitigate these risks through legal contracts, internal controls and counterparty diligence, residual risk remains due to factors beyond our control.
We face other risks related to our digital asset treasury reserve business model.
Our digital asset treasury reserve business model exposes us to various risks, including the following:
| ● | HYPE and other digital assets are subject to significant legal, commercial, regulatory, and technical uncertainty, and our HYPE strategy subjects us to enhanced regulatory oversight; |
| ● | regulatory changes could impact our ability to operate validators or receive rewards; |
| ● | regulatory scrutiny of the Company’s activities may increase, potentially limiting our operations; |
| ● | potential litigation risks exist related to smart contract vulnerabilities, validator operations, or our business activities; |
| ● | uncertainty around digital assets, including HYPE’s, regulatory status may impact our ability to list on certain exchanges; |
| ● | changes in political administration may not guarantee a favorable regulatory environment for digital assets; |
| ● | future SEC actions or court decisions could retroactively classify digital assets as a security, potentially leading to penalties or forced unwinding of transactions; and |
| ● | increased regulatory focus on Layer-1 blockchains beyond Bitcoin and Ethereum could result in new compliance requirements. |
We may engage in distinct digital asset financing strategies, in which we will leverage our digital asset holdings to acquire additional amounts of the same leveraged digital assets, and may do so on a compounded basis, which will increase our exposure to smart-contract, operational, and counterparty risks.
We may engage in digital asset leverage strategies to acquire additional amounts of HYPE. As part of this strategy, we may borrow digital assets by pledging our own HYPE holdings as collateral, deploy these borrowed assets to acquire additional amounts of HYPE, and subsequently re-pledge the newly acquired HYPE to further engage in these leveraged transactions. As each of these transactions will be effectuated on chain, the strategy may expose us to significant smart-contract vulnerabilities and operational risks. The smart contracts that are used for purposes of these transactions may contain undiscovered bugs, logical errors or economic vulnerabilities that could be exploited by malicious actors or that could cause the contracts to perform in unintended ways, resulting in partial or total loss of our collateral and borrowed assets. In addition, the strategy may subject us to counterparty risk through the platforms we utilize to facilitate leveraging strategies including, among others, insolvency of the platform, coding errors, and cyberattacks. Finally, lenders customarily require that collateral ratios be maintained within narrowly defined thresholds and may exercise broad contractual discretion to impose additional margin requirements or to liquidate collateral without notice when those
47
Table of Contents
thresholds are breached. We may also incur losses if the interest that accrues on our borrowings significantly exceeds the revenue generated by the borrowed HYPE.
FINANCIAL REPORTING, TAX, ACCOUNTING AND TRADING RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH OUR STRATEGY
We may be subject to additional tax liability if regulation or policy changes adversely affect the tax treatment of rewards from staking HYPE.
The U.S. federal income tax treatment of rewards from staking digital assets such as HYPE remains uncertain and is currently under the subject of debate and regulatory attention. Under current guidance by the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”), staking rewards are generally treated as ordinary income upon receipt. If regulation or policy changes, or the interpretation or enforcement thereof, results in adverse tax treatment of rewards from staking HYPE, we could be subject to increased audits by the IRS and additional tax liabilities.
Our historical financial statements do not reflect the potential variability in earnings that we may experience in the future relating to our HYPE holdings.
Our historical financial statements do not reflect the potential variability in earnings that we may experience in the future from holding or selling significant amounts of HYPE. The prices of digital assets have historically been subject to significant price fluctuations and are highly volatile. In December 2023, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Accounting Standards Update 2023-08, Intangibles—Goodwill and Other—Crypto Assets (Subtopic 350-60): Accounting for and Disclosure of Crypto Assets (“ASU 2023-08”), which we have adopted.
ASU 2023-08 requires us to measure our HYPE holdings at fair value in our balance sheet, and to recognize gains and losses from changes in the fair value of our HYPE in net income each reporting period. ASU 2023-08 also requires us to provide certain interim and annual disclosures with respect to our HYPE holdings. As a result, volatility in our earnings may be significantly more than what we experienced in prior periods.
Unrealized fair value gains on our HYPE holdings could cause us to become subject to the corporate alternative minimum tax under the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022.
The United States enacted the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (“IRA”) in August 2022. Unless an exemption applies, the IRA imposes a 15% corporate alternative minimum tax (“CAMT”) on a corporation with respect to an initial tax year and subsequent tax years, if the average annual adjusted financial statement income for any consecutive three-tax-year period preceding the initial tax year exceeds $1 billion. On September 12, 2024, the Department of Treasury and the IRS issued proposed regulations with respect to the application of the CAMT.
In connection with the implementation of our HYPE treasury strategy, we have adopted ASU 2023-08. ASU 2023-08 requires us to measure our HYPE holdings at fair value in our balance sheet, with gains and losses from changes in the fair value of our HYPE recognized in net income each reporting period. When determining whether we are subject to CAMT and when calculating any related tax liability for an applicable tax year, the proposed regulations provide that, among other adjustments, our adjusted financial statement income must include this ratable amount in addition to any unrealized gains or losses reported in the applicable tax year.
Accordingly, as a result of the enactment of the IRA and our adoption of ASU 2023-08, unless the IRA is amended or the proposed regulations with respect to CAMT, when finalized, are revised to provide relief (or other interim relief is granted), we could become subject to the CAMT in future tax years. If we become subject to the CAMT, it could result in a material tax obligation that we would need to satisfy in cash, which could materially affect our financial results, including our earnings and cash flow, and our financial condition.
48
Table of Contents
Due to the unregulated nature and lack of transparency surrounding the operations of many HYPE trading venues, HYPE trading venues may experience greater fraud, security failures or regulatory or operational problems than trading venues for more established asset classes, which may result in a loss of confidence in HYPE trading venues and adversely affect the value of our HYPE.
HYPE trading venues are relatively new and, in many cases, unregulated. Furthermore, there are many HYPE trading venues which do not provide the public with significant information regarding their ownership structure, management teams, corporate practices and regulatory compliance. As a result, the marketplace may lose confidence in HYPE trading venues, including prominent exchanges that handle a significant volume of HYPE trading and/or are subject to regulatory oversight, in the event one or more HYPE trading venues cease or pause for a prolonged period the trading of HYPE or other digital assets, or experience fraud, significant volumes of withdrawal, security failures or operational problems.
The SEC alleged as part of its June 5, 2023, complaint against Binance that Binance committed strategic and targeted “wash trading” through its affiliates to artificially inflate the volume of certain digital assets traded on its exchange. The SEC has also brought recent actions against individuals and digital asset market participants alleging that such persons artificially increased trading volumes in certain digital assets through wash trades, or repeated buying and selling of the same assets in fictitious transactions to manipulate their underlying trading price. Such reports and allegations may indicate that the HYPE market is significantly smaller than expected and that the United States makes up a significantly larger percentage of the HYPE market than is commonly understood. Any actual or perceived wash trading in the HYPE market, and any other fraudulent or manipulative acts and practices, could adversely affect the value of our HYPE.
Negative perception, a lack of stability in the broader digital currency markets and the closure, temporary shutdown or operational disruption of HYPE trading venues, lending institutions, institutional investors, institutional miners, custodians, or other major participants in the HYPE ecosystem, due to fraud, business failure, cybersecurity events, government-mandated regulation, bankruptcy, or for any other reason, may result in a decline in confidence in HYPE and the broader digital currency ecosystem and greater volatility in the price of HYPE. For example, in 2022, each of Celsius Network, Voyager Digital, Three Arrows Capital, FTX, and BlockFi filed for bankruptcy, following which digital assets significantly declined. In addition, in June 2023, the SEC announced enforcement actions against Coinbase and Binance, two providers of large trading venues for digital assets, which similarly was followed by a decrease in the market price of digital assets. These were followed in November 2023, by an SEC enforcement action against Payward Inc. and Payward Ventures Inc., together known as Kraken, another large trading venue for digital assets. While the complaint against Coinbase was dismissed in February 2025, the complaint against Payward Inc. and Payward Ventures Inc. was dismissed with prejudice in March 2025, and the complaint against Binance was dismissed on May 29, 2025, the SEC or other regulatory agencies may initiate similar actions in the future. As the price of our listed securities may be affected by the value of our HYPE holdings, the failure of a major participant in the digital currency ecosystem could have a material adverse effect on the market price of our listed securities.
Delisting of our common stock from Nasdaq could prevent us from maintaining an active, liquid and orderly trading market for our common stock and may materially and adversely impact our ability to consummate certain strategic transactions.
Our ability to publicly or privately sell equity securities and the liquidity of our common stock would be adversely affected if we are delisted from The Nasdaq Capital Market or if we are unable to transfer our listing to another stock market. On September 18, 2024, we were notified by The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC, or Nasdaq, that we were in breach of Listing Rule 5550(a)(2), or the (“Minimum Bid Price Rule”), for continued listing on the Nasdaq Capital Market because the minimum bid price of our listed securities for 30 consecutive business days had been less than $1 per share. On December 12, 2024, we received a letter from Nasdaq notifying us that, because the closing bid price for our common stock was below $0.10 per share for 10 consecutive trading days, we were in breach of Listing Rule 5810(c)(3)(A)(iii). On January 31, 2025, we executed an 80-for-1 reverse stock split, following which we were notified by Nasdaq that we had regained compliance with the Minimum Bid Price Rule. Nasdaq Listing Rule 5810(c)(3)(A)(iv) states that any listed company that fails to meet the Minimum Bid Price Rule and has effected a reverse stock split over the prior one-year period, or has effected one or more reverse stock splits over the prior two-year period with a cumulative ratio of 250 shares or more to one, will not be eligible for an automatic 180-day grace compliance period and the Nasdaq Listing Qualifications Department is obligated to immediately issue a delisting determination. Therefore, if we were to fall out of compliance with the Minimum Bid Price requirement prior to January 31, 2026, we would not be able to effect a reverse stock split and would immediately be issued a delisting determination.
49
Table of Contents
If our common stock is delisted by Nasdaq, it could lead to a number of negative implications, including an adverse effect on the price of our common stock, deterring broker-dealers from making a market in or otherwise seeking or generating interest in our common stock, increased volatility in our common stock, reduced liquidity in our common stock, the loss of federal preemption of state securities laws and greater difficulty in obtaining financing. Delisting could also cause a loss of confidence of our customers, collaborators, vendors, suppliers and employees, which could harm our business and future prospects.
If our common stock is delisted by Nasdaq, the price of our common stock may decline, and although our common stock may be eligible to trade on the OTC Bulletin Board, another over-the-counter quotation system, or on the pink sheets, an investor may find it more difficult to dispose of their common stock or obtain accurate quotations as to the market value of our common stock. If our common stock is delisted from Nasdaq, trading in our securities may be subject to the SEC’s “penny stock” rules. These “penny stock” rules will require brokers trading in our common stock to adhere to more stringent rules and possibly result in a reduced level of trading activity in the secondary trading market for our common stock. The additional burdens imposed upon broker-dealers by these requirements may discourage broker-dealers from recommending transactions in our securities, which could severely limit the liquidity of our securities and consequently adversely affect the market price for our securities.
Further, if our common stock is delisted, we would incur additional costs under state blue sky laws in connection with any sales of our securities. These requirements could severely limit the market liquidity of our common stock and the ability of our stockholders to sell our common stock in the secondary market.
The terms of our Loan and Security Agreement require us to meet certain operating covenants and place restrictions on our operating and financial flexibility. If we raise additional capital through debt financing, the terms of any new debt could further restrict our ability to operate our business.
On November 22, 2022, we entered into a Loan and Security Agreement with Avenue Capital, which is secured by a lien on all of our assets. The amount we owed under the Loan and Security Agreement as of September 30, 2025 was $8,254,696. The Loan and Security Agreement contains customary affirmative and negative covenants and events of default. Affirmative covenants include, among others, covenants requiring us to protect and maintain our intellectual property and comply with all applicable laws, deliver certain financial reports and maintain insurance coverage. Negative covenants include, among others, covenants restricting us from transferring any part of our business or intellectual property, incurring additional indebtedness, engaging in mergers or acquisitions, repurchasing shares, paying dividends or making other distributions, making investments, and creating other liens on our assets, including our intellectual property, in each case subject to customary exceptions. If we raise any additional debt financing, the terms of such additional debt could further restrict our operating and financial flexibility. These restrictions may include, among other things, limitations on the incurrence of additional debt and specific restrictions on the use of our assets, as well as prohibitions on our ability to create liens, pay dividends, redeem capital stock or make investments. If we default under the terms of the Loan and Security Agreement or any future debt facility, Avenue may accelerate all of our repayment obligations and take control of our pledged assets, potentially requiring us to renegotiate our agreement on terms less favorable to us or to immediately cease operations. Further, if we were to be liquidated, Avenue’s right to repayment would be senior to the rights of the holders of our common stock. Avenue could declare an event of default upon the occurrence of any event that could reasonably be expected to result in what they interpret as a material adverse effect as defined under the Loan and Security Agreement. Any declaration by Avenue of an event of default could significantly harm our business and prospects and could cause the price of our common stock to decline.
A significant portion of our total outstanding shares may be sold into the market in the near future, which could cause the market price of our common stock to drop significantly, even if our business is performing well.
Sales of a substantial number of shares of our common stock in the public market could occur at any time, subject to certain restrictions. These sales, or the perception in the market that holders of a large number of shares intend to sell shares, could reduce the market price of our common stock. As of September 30, 2025, we had 600,000,000 shares of common stock authorized and 7,162,659 shares of common stock outstanding, 33,820,785 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants, 97,137 shares of our common stock issuable upon exercise of options, 2,178,151 shares of common stock issuable upon the vesting and/or delivery of restricted stock units and 16,307,694 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of Series A preferred stock.
50
Table of Contents
We have broad discretion in the use of our cash, including the net proceeds from our financings, and might not use them effectively.
Our management has broad discretion in the application and deployment of our cash resources, including the net proceeds from our financing transactions, and could spend our cash in ways that do not improve our results of operations or enhance the value of our common stock. The failure by our management to apply these funds effectively could result in financial losses that could have a material adverse effect on our business and cause the price of our common stock to decline. Pending their use, we may invest our cash, including the net proceeds from our financings, in a manner that does not produce income or that loses value.
We may be adversely affected by the effects of inflation.
Inflation has the potential to adversely affect our liquidity, business, financial condition and results of operations by increasing our overall cost structure. The existence of inflation in the economy has resulted in, and may continue to result in, higher interest rates and capital costs, shipping costs, supply shortages, increased costs of labor, weakening exchange rates and other similar effects. Recently, inflation has increased throughout the U.S. economy. We may experience increases in the prices of labor and other costs of doing business. In an inflationary environment, cost increases may outpace our expectations, causing us to use our cash and other liquid assets faster than forecasted. If this happens, we may need to raise additional capital to fund our operations, which may not be available in sufficient amounts or on reasonable terms, if at all, sooner than expected.
As a public company, we are required to have effective internal controls and disclosure controls, which are costly and time consuming to implement. Failure to maintain adequate financial controls could cause us to have material weaknesses, which could adversely affect our operations and financial position.
As a public company, we are subject to the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the Dodd-Frank Act, and the rules and regulations of Nasdaq. The requirements of these rules and regulations result in legal, accounting, and financial compliance costs, make some activities more difficult, time-consuming, and costly, and may also place undue strain on our personnel, systems, and resources.
We are required to disclose changes made to our internal control and procedures on a quarterly basis. However, our independent registered public accounting firm will not be required to formally attest to the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act until we are no longer a “smaller reporting company” as defined in the rules of the SEC. If we are not able to comply with the requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act in a timely manner, the market price of our stock could decline and we could be subject to sanctions or investigations by Nasdaq, the SEC, or other regulatory authorities, which would require additional financial and management resources.
An internal control system, no matter how well-designed, cannot provide absolute assurance that misstatements due to error or fraud will not occur or that all control issues and instances of fraud will be detected. If we are not able to comply with the requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, or if we are unable to maintain proper and effective internal controls, we might not be able to produce timely and accurate financial statements. If that were to happen, the market price of our stock could decline and we could be subject to sanctions or investigations by Nasdaq, the SEC, or other regulatory authorities.
Any failure to maintain effective controls, or any difficulties encountered in their implementation or improvement, could harm our operating results or cause us to fail to meet our reporting obligations. Any failure to implement and maintain effective internal controls also could adversely affect the results of periodic management evaluations regarding the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting that we are required to include in our periodic reports filed with the SEC under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Ineffective disclosure controls and procedures or internal control over financial reporting could also cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial and other information, which would likely have a negative effect on the trading price of our common stock. Implementing any appropriate changes to our internal controls may require specific compliance training of our directors, officers, and employees, entail substantial costs in order to modify our existing accounting systems, and take a significant period of time to complete. Such changes may not be effective, however, in maintaining the adequacy of our internal controls, and any failure to maintain that adequacy, or consequent inability to produce accurate financial statements on a timely basis, could increase our operating costs and could materially impair our ability to operate our business. In the event that we are not able to demonstrate compliance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, that our internal controls are perceived as inadequate, or that we are unable to produce timely or accurate financial statements, investors may lose confidence in our operating results and our stock price could decline.
51
Table of Contents
The accuracy of our financial reporting depends on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. We have identified material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting, which may raise questions regarding the accuracy and reliability of our financial statements and our ability to report accurately in the future.
A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of our annual or interim consolidated financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. During the process of preparing the financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2024, we determined that we had material weaknesses related to the incorrect valuation of the Company’s accounting for shares of common stock that were issued for licensing agreements and debt modification and the impairment of a right-of-use asset. Due to the existence of these material weaknesses, our management has concluded that as of September 30, 2025, our internal control over financial reporting was not effective.
We are taking steps to remediate these material weaknesses. However, we cannot provide any assurance that the measures we have taken to date and that we intend to implement will be sufficient to remediate the material weaknesses that we have identified, or to avoid additional material weaknesses from occurring in the future. These material weaknesses, or those that may occur in the future, could have an adverse effect on our ability to meet our reporting obligations, which could cause our investors to lose confidence in our publicly reported information, cause the market price of our stock to decline, harm our reputation, business and financial results, and expose us to litigation or investigations by the SEC or other regulatory authorities.
OTHER RISKS RELATING TO THE OWNERSHIP OF OUR COMMON STOCK
Provisions in our corporate charter documents and under Delaware law could make an acquisition of us, which may be beneficial to our stockholders, more difficult and may prevent attempts by our stockholders to replace or remove our current management.
Provisions in our certificate of incorporation, and our bylaws may discourage, delay or prevent a merger, acquisition or other change in control of us that stockholders may consider favorable, including transactions in which you might otherwise receive a premium for your shares. These provisions also could limit the price that investors might be willing to pay in the future for shares of our common stock, thereby depressing the market price of our common stock. In addition, because our Board of Directors is responsible for appointing the members of our management team, these provisions may frustrate or prevent any attempts by our stockholders to replace or remove our current management by making it more difficult for stockholders to replace members of our Board. Among other things, these provisions:
| ● | allow the authorized number of our directors to be changed only by resolution adopted by a majority of our Board; |
| ● | limit the manner in which stockholders can remove directors from the Board, as may be permitted by law; |
| ● | establish advance notice requirements for stockholder proposals that can be acted on at stockholder meetings and nominations to our Board; |
| ● | limit who may call stockholder meetings; |
| ● | authorize our Board to issue preferred stock without stockholder approval, which could be used to institute a stockholder rights plan, or so-called “poison pill,” that would work to dilute the stock ownership of a potential hostile acquirer, effectively preventing acquisitions that have not been approved by our Board; and |
| ● | require all stockholder action to take place at duly called stockholder meetings and disallow the ability of our stockholders to act by majority written consent. |
Moreover, because we are incorporated in Delaware, we are governed by the provisions of Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, which prohibits a person who owns in excess of 15% of our outstanding voting stock from merging or combining with us for a period of three years after the date of the transaction in which the person acquired in excess of 15% of our outstanding voting stock, unless the merger or combination is approved in a prescribed manner.
52
Table of Contents
Our certificate of incorporation provides that the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware is, to the fullest extent permitted by law, the sole and exclusive forum for substantially all disputes between us and our stockholders. These choice of forum provisions could limit the ability of stockholders to obtain a favorable judicial forum for disputes with us or our directors, officers or employees.
Unless we consent to the selection of an alternative forum, our certificate of incorporation provides that the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware, or the Court of Chancery, will be, to the fullest extent permitted by law, the sole and exclusive forum for any derivative action or proceeding brought on our behalf; any action asserting a claim of breach of fiduciary duty owed by any of our directors, officers or other employees or agent to the Company or our stockholders; any action asserting a claim against us arising pursuant to the Delaware General Corporation Law, or DGCL, or our certificate of incorporation or bylaws; any action to enforce or determine the validity of our certificate of incorporation or bylaws; or any action asserting a claim against us that is governed by the internal affairs doctrine. Since the choice of forum provisions are only applicable to “the fullest extent permitted by law,” as provided in our certificate of incorporation, the provisions do not designate the Court of Chancery as the exclusive forum for any derivative action or other claim for which the applicable statute creates exclusive jurisdiction in another forum. As such, the choice of forum provisions do not apply to any actions arising under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act.
These choice of forum provisions may limit a stockholder’s ability to bring a claim in a judicial forum that it finds favorable for disputes with us or our directors, officers or other employees, which may discourage such lawsuits against us and our directors, officers and other employees. Alternatively, if a court were to find the choice of forum provisions contained in our certificate of incorporation to be inapplicable or unenforceable in an action, we may incur additional costs associated with resolving such action in other jurisdictions, which could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.
Because we do not anticipate paying any cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future, capital appreciation, if any, will be your sole source of gain.
We have never declared or paid cash dividends on our common stock. We currently intend to retain all of our future earnings, if any, to finance the growth and development of our business. In addition, the terms of any future debt agreements may preclude us from paying dividends. As a result, capital appreciation, if any, of our common stock will be your sole source of gain for the foreseeable future.
If securities analysts do not continue to publish research or reports about our business or if they publish negative evaluations of our stock, the price of our stock could decline.
The trading market for our common stock will rely, in part, on the research and reports that industry or financial analysts publish about us or our business. If securities analysts do not continue coverage of us, the trading price of our stock could decrease. Additionally, if one or more of the analysts covering our business downgrade their evaluations of our stock, the price of our stock could decline. If one or more of these analysts cease to cover our stock, we could lose visibility in the market for our stock, which in turn could cause our stock price to decline.
We are an “smaller reporting company” and the reduced disclosure requirements applicable to smaller reporting companies may make our common stock less attractive to investors.
We are considered a “smaller reporting company” under Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. We are therefore entitled to rely on certain reduced disclosure requirements, such as an exemption from providing selected financial data and executive compensation information. These exemptions and reduced disclosures in our SEC filings due to our status as a smaller reporting company also mean our auditors are not required to review our internal control over financial reporting and may make it harder for investors to analyze our results of operations and financial prospects. We cannot predict if investors will find our common stock less attractive because we may rely on these exemptions. If some investors find our common stock less attractive as a result, there may be a less active trading market for our common stock and our common stock prices may be more volatile. We will remain a smaller reporting company until our public float exceeds $250 million as of the last business day of our most recently completed second quarter if our annual revenues are $100 million or more as of our most recently completed fiscal year, or until our public float exceeds $700 million as of the last business day of our most recently completed second quarter if our annual revenues are less than $100 million as of our most recently completed fiscal year.
53
Table of Contents
We are highly dependent on the services of our senior management team, and if we are not able to retain these members of our management team or recruit and retain additional management personnel, our business will be harmed.
We are highly dependent on our senior management team. The employment agreements we have with our executive officers do not prevent such persons from terminating their employment with us at any time. The loss of the services of any of these persons could impede the achievement of our business objectives.
In addition, we are dependent on our continued ability to retain and motivate highly qualified additional personnel. If we are not able to retain our management and to retain personnel necessary for the operation of our business, we might not be able to sustain our operations or grow.
We rely upon information technology and any failure, inadequacy, interruption or security lapse of that technology, including any cyber security incidents, could harm our ability to operate our business effectively.
In the ordinary course of our business, we collect and store sensitive data and intellectual property and proprietary business information owned or controlled by ourselves or our business partners. This data encompasses a wide variety of business-critical information including operational information, commercial information, and business and financial information. We face four primary risks relative to protecting this critical information: loss of access; inappropriate disclosure; inappropriate modification; and inadequate monitoring of our controls over the first three risks.
The secure processing, storage, maintenance, and transmission of this critical information is vital to our operations and business strategy, and we devote significant resources to protecting such information. Although we take measures to protect sensitive information from unauthorized access or disclosure, our information technology and infrastructure may be vulnerable to attacks by hackers or viruses, breaches, interruptions due to employee error, malfeasance, faulty password management, lapses in compliance with privacy and security mandates, or other disruptions. The risk of a security breach or disruption, particularly through cyber-attack or cyber intrusion, including by computer hackers, foreign governments and cyber terrorists, has generally increased as the number, intensity and sophistication of attempted attacks and intrusions from around the world have increased. Our IT networks and related systems are essential to the operation of our business and our ability to perform day-to-day operations. To the extent that any disruption or security breach were to result in a loss of or damage to our data or applications, or inappropriate disclosure of confidential or proprietary information, we could incur substantial liability. Although we make efforts to maintain the security and integrity of these types of IT networks and related systems, and we have implemented various measures to manage the risk of a security breach or disruption, there can be no assurance that our security efforts and measures will be effective or that attempted security breaches or disruptions would not be successful or damaging. Our information technology systems may have vulnerabilities, and we may not have the resources or technical sophistication to anticipate or prevent rapidly evolving types of cyberattacks, such as ransomware attacks. A significant cyber incident, including system failure, security breach, disruption by malware or other damage, could interrupt or delay our operations, result in a violation of applicable cybersecurity and privacy and other laws, damage our reputation, cause a loss of customers or expose sensitive data, or give rise to monetary fines and other penalties, which could be significant.
Any such breach or interruption could compromise our networks and the information stored there could be accessed by unauthorized parties, publicly disclosed, lost, or stolen. Third parties may attempt to fraudulently induce employees or other persons into disclosing usernames, passwords or other sensitive information, which may in turn be used to access our information systems, commit identity theft or carry out other unauthorized or illegal activities. Any such breach could compromise our networks and the information stored there could be accessed, publicly disclosed, lost or stolen. We engage third-party vendors and service providers to store and otherwise process some of our data, including sensitive and personal information. Our vendors and service providers may also be the targets of the risks described above, including cyberattacks, malicious software, phishing schemes, and fraud. Our ability to monitor our vendors and service providers’ data security is limited, and, in any event, third parties may be able to circumvent those security measures, resulting in the unauthorized access to, misuse, disclosure, loss or destruction of our data, including sensitive and personal information, and disruption of our or third-party service providers’ systems. We and our third-party service providers may face difficulties in identifying, or promptly responding to, potential security breaches and other instances of unauthorized access to, or disclosure or other loss of, information. Any hacking or other attack on our or our third-party service providers’ or vendors’ systems, and any unauthorized access to, or disclosure or other loss of, information suffered by us or our third-party service providers or vendors, or the perception that any of these have occurred, could result in legal claims or proceedings, loss of intellectual property, liability under laws that protect the privacy of personal information, negative publicity, disruption of our operations and damage to our reputation, which could divert our management’s attention from the operation of our business and materially and adversely affect our business, revenues and competitive position. Moreover, we may need to increase our efforts to train our personnel to detect and defend against
54
Table of Contents
cyber- or phishing-attacks, which are becoming more sophisticated and frequent, and we may need to implement additional protective measures to reduce the risk of potential security breaches, which could cause us to incur significant additional expenses.
Any such security breach or interruption, as well as any action by us or our employees or contractors that might be inconsistent with the rapidly evolving data privacy and security laws and regulations applicable within the United States, could result in enforcement actions by U.S. states, the U.S. federal government, regulatory penalties, other legal proceedings, including but not limited to private litigation, the incurrence of significant remediation costs, disruptions to our business operations, diversion of management efforts and damage to our reputation, which could harm our business and operations. Because of the rapidly moving nature of technology and the increasing sophistication of cybersecurity threats, our measures to prevent, respond to and minimize such risks may be unsuccessful.
In addition, our insurance may be insufficient to cover our losses resulting from cyber-attacks, breaches, or other interruptions, and any incidents may result in loss of, or increased costs of, such insurance. The successful assertion of one or more large claims against us that exceed available insurance coverage, the occurrence of changes in our insurance policies, including premium increases or the imposition of large deductible or co-insurance requirements, or denials of coverage, could have a material adverse effect on our business, including our financial condition, results of operations and reputation.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities
None.
Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers.
None.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.
Not applicable.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.
Not applicable.
Item 5. Other Information.
Securities Trading Plans of Directors and Executive Officers
During the nine months ended September 30, 2025, none of our
55
Table of Contents
Item 6. Exhibits.
Exhibit | Incorporated by Reference from Filings as Noted Below (Unless | |||||||||
Number |
| Exhibit Description |
| Form |
| File No. |
| Exhibit |
| Filing Date |
3.1 | Third Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation | 8-K | 001-38365 | 3.1 | January 29, 2018 | |||||
3.1.1 | Certificate of Amendment to the Third Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation | 8-K | 001-38365 | 3.1.1 | June 14, 2018 | |||||
3.1.2 | | Certificate of Amendment to the Third Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation | | 8-K | | 001-38365 | | 3.1 | | June 14, 2024 |
3.1.3 | | Certificate of Amendment to the Third Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation | | 8-K | | 001-38365 | | 3.1 | | January 31, 2025 |
3.1.4 | | Certificate of Amendment to the Third Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation | | 8-K | | 001-38365 | | 3.1 | | July 2, 2025 |
3.1.5 | | Certificate of Designation of Series A Non-Voting Convertible Preferred Stock | | 8-K | | 001-38365 | | 3.1 | | June 24, 2025 |
3.2 | | Second Amended and Restated Bylaws | | 8-K | | 001-38365 | | 3.1 | | February 7, 2022 |
4.1 | | Form of Purchaser Warrant, dated June 17, 2025 | | 8-K | | 001-38365 | | 4.1 | | June 24, 2025 |
4.2 | | Form of Placement Agent Warrant, dated June 17, 2025 | | 8-K | | 001-38365 | | 4.2 | | June 24, 2025 |
4.3 | Form of Lender Warrant, dated June 17, 2025 | 8-K | 001-38365 | 4.3 | June 24, 2025 | |||||
10.1#˄ | Employment Agreement by and between the Company and David Knox, dated September 8. 2025 | 8-K | 001-38365 | 10.1 | September 29, 2025 | |||||
10.2 | | Amendment No. 1 to the Amended and Restated Sales Agreement by and between the Company and Chardan Capital Markets, LLC, dated September 24, 2025 | | 8-K | | 001-38635 | | 1.1 | | September 24, 2025 |
10.3 | | Inducement Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement between the Company and David Knox, dated September 29, 2025 | | — | | — | | — | | Filed herewith |
31.1 | | Certification of the Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | | — | | — | | — | | Filed herewith |
31.2 | | Certification of the Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | | — | | — | | — | | Filed herewith |
32.1* | | Certification of the Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | | — | | — | | — | | Filed herewith |
32.2* | | Certification of the Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | | — | | — | | — | | Filed herewith |
101.INS | | Inline XBRL Instance Document | | — | | — | | — | | Filed herewith |
101.SCH | | Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document | | — | | — | | — | | Filed herewith |
101.CAL | | Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document | | — | | — | | — | | Filed herewith |
101.DEF | | Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document | | — | | — | | — | | Filed herewith |
56
Table of Contents
101.LAB | | Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document | | — | | — | | — | | Filed herewith |
101.PRE | | Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document | | — | | — | | — | | Filed herewith |
104 | | Cover Page Interactive Data File - the cover page XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document contained in Exhibit 101 | | — | | — | | — | | Filed herewith |
* | This certification is deemed not filed for purpose of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933. |
# | Certain information in this Exhibit was omitted by means of marking such information with brackets (“[***]”) because the identified information (i) is not material and (ii) is the type of information that the Company treats as private or confidential. |
˄ | Management contract or other compensatory plan. |
57
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
| HYPERION DEFI, INC. | |
|
| |
Date: November 13, 2025 | By: | /s/ Hyunsu Jung |
|
| Hyunsu Jung |
|
| Interim Chief Executive Officer |
| | |
Date: November 13, 2025 | By: | /s/ David Knox |
| | David Knox |
| | Chief Financial Officer |
58