IonQ (IONQ) holders back board nominees, auditor and say-on-pay
Filing Impact
Filing Sentiment
Form Type
8-K
Rhea-AI Filing Summary
IonQ, Inc. held its 2026 Annual Meeting of Stockholders on June 16, 2026. Stockholders elected two Class II directors, Kathryn K. Chou and William F. Scannell, to serve until the 2029 annual meeting and until their successors are elected and qualified.
Stockholders also ratified the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2026, with 164,960,644 votes in favor. In addition, a non-binding advisory proposal approving the compensation of IonQ’s named executive officers received 45,871,221 votes for, 39,484,263 against, and 968,383 abstentions, with 80,624,504 broker non-votes.
Positive
- None.
Negative
- None.
8-K Event Classification
Item 5.07 — Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
1 item
Item 5.07
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
Governance
Results of a shareholder vote on proposals at an annual or special meeting.
Key Figures
Total votes represented: 166,948,371 shares
Votes for Chou: 61,583,731 votes
Votes for Scannell: 71,677,431 votes
+4 more
7 metrics
Total votes represented
166,948,371 shares
All proposals at 2026 Annual Meeting
Votes for Chou
61,583,731 votes
Election of Kathryn K. Chou as Class II director
Votes for Scannell
71,677,431 votes
Election of William F. Scannell as Class II director
Auditor ratification for votes
164,960,644 votes
Ratification of Ernst & Young LLP for 2026
Say-on-pay for votes
45,871,221 votes
Advisory approval of named executive officer compensation
Say-on-pay against votes
39,484,263 votes
Advisory approval of named executive officer compensation
Broker non-votes on say-on-pay
80,624,504 shares
Advisory vote on executive compensation
Key Terms
Emerging growth company, broker non-votes, independent registered public accounting firm, non-binding, advisory basis, +1 more
5 terms
Emerging growth company regulatory
"Emerging growth company Item 5.07 Submission of Matters to a Vote"
An emerging growth company is a recently public or smaller public firm that qualifies for temporary, lighter regulatory and disclosure rules to reduce the cost and effort of being public. For investors, it means the company may provide less historical financial detail and face fewer reporting requirements than larger firms, so it can grow more quickly but also carries higher uncertainty—like buying a promising early-stage product with fewer user reviews.
broker non-votes financial
"Broker Non-Votes | | | Total | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Advisory vote"
Broker non-votes occur when a brokerage firm is unable to vote on a shareholder’s behalf during a company election or decision because the shareholder has not given specific voting instructions, and the broker is not allowed or chooses not to vote on certain matters. They are important because they can affect the outcome of votes, especially when the results are close, by effectively reducing the total number of votes cast.
independent registered public accounting firm regulatory
"ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as independent registered public accounting firm for 2026"
An independent registered public accounting firm is an outside accounting company officially registered with the government regulator to examine and report on a public company's financial records and controls. Investors treat its reports like an impartial inspector’s certificate — they add credibility to financial statements, help spot errors or misleading claims, and reduce the risk that shareholders are relying on unchecked or biased numbers.
non-binding, advisory basis regulatory
"proposal to approve, on a non-binding, advisory basis, the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers"
A non-binding, advisory basis means a recommendation or decision that carries no legal force and does not obligate the parties to act; it’s similar to a friendly suggestion rather than a signed promise. For investors, this matters because such guidance can influence market expectations and management plans but offers no guarantee of follow-through, so investors should treat it as informative input rather than a firm commitment.
named executive officers financial
"the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers, as disclosed in the Company’s definitive proxy statement"
Named executive officers are the senior company leaders whose names, roles and compensation are singled out in required regulatory filings; this typically includes the chief executive, chief financial officer and the next highest‑paid senior officers. Investors treat this list like a team roster — it shows who makes key decisions, how they are paid and whether incentives align with shareholder interests, so changes or pay patterns can signal governance quality, risk or strategic shifts.
FAQ
What key decisions were made at IonQ (IONQ) 2026 Annual Meeting?
Stockholders elected two Class II directors, ratified Ernst & Young LLP as 2026 auditor, and approved on a non-binding basis the compensation of named executive officers. These outcomes maintain existing leadership, confirm the auditor, and endorse current executive pay practices.
Who was elected to IonQ (IONQ) board at the 2026 Annual Meeting?
Kathryn K. Chou and William F. Scannell were elected as Class II directors to serve until the 2029 annual meeting and until their successors are elected and qualified. Both nominees received more votes for than withheld from stockholders present or represented.
Did IonQ (IONQ) stockholders approve the 2026 auditor ratification?
Yes, stockholders ratified Ernst & Young LLP as IonQ’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2026 with 164,960,644 votes for, 1,194,381 against, and 793,346 abstentions. This confirms continued engagement of the same audit firm for the upcoming year.
How did IonQ (IONQ) stockholders vote on executive compensation in 2026?
Stockholders approved, on a non-binding advisory basis, the compensation of IonQ’s named executive officers with 45,871,221 votes for, 39,484,263 against, and 968,383 abstentions. There were also 80,624,504 broker non-votes recorded on this advisory say-on-pay proposal.