[Form 4] Invivyd, Inc. Insider Trading Activity
Paul Bolno, a director of Invivyd, Inc. (IVVD), was granted a stock option on 09/22/2025 to buy 100,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $1.22 per share. The option expires on 09/21/2035. The grant vests over three years: one-third vests on the first anniversary of the grant and the remainder vests in equal monthly installments (1/36th) thereafter, subject to continuous service through each vesting date. Following the grant, the reporting person beneficially owns 100,000 option shares, held directly. The Form 4 was filed with a signature dated 09/24/2025 by an attorney-in-fact.
- Equity alignment: Grant ties the director's interests to long-term shareholder value through time-based vesting.
- Clear vesting schedule: One-third at one year then monthly vesting provides predictable retention incentives.
- Potential dilution: The exercise of 100,000 options will increase share count if exercised.
- No performance vesting: Vesting is solely time-based, not tied to company performance milestones.
Insights
TL;DR: A routine director option grant with time-based vesting, standard for board alignment and retention.
The grant of 100,000 options at $1.22 with a ten-year term and a three-year vesting schedule is consistent with common board compensation practices intended to align the director's interests with long-term shareholder value. The direct ownership of the options simplifies disclosure and avoids layered indirect ownership complexities. There is no indication in the filing of performance-based vesting or acceleration provisions. From a governance perspective, this is a routine, time-based equity award disclosed under Section 16.
TL;DR: Typical retention-focused equity grant; impact depends on company size and total dilution from outstanding equity.
The terms—exercise price $1.22, expiration 09/21/2035, and time-based vesting—signal a standard retention and incentive award for a director. Without data on total shares outstanding or aggregate option pool use, the materiality of 100,000 options cannot be assessed from this filing alone. The absence of performance conditions suggests compensation is tied to service tenure rather than specific milestones.