GSAM Files Schedule 13G Reporting 4.615M Kinetik Shares (~7.6%)
Rhea-AI Filing Summary
Goldman Sachs Asset Management, L.P. reports beneficial ownership of 4,615,445.10 shares of Kinetik Holdings Inc. Class A common stock, representing 7.6% of the class. The filing shows no sole voting or dispositive power; all voting (4,543,185.10 shares) and dispositive (4,615,445.10 shares) powers are shared.
The filer is identified as an investment adviser (IA) and certifies the position is held in the ordinary course of business and not to influence control. A joint filing agreement (Exhibit 99.1) accompanies the statement, authorizing joint filing and amendments.
Positive
- Material institutional stake disclosed: GSAM beneficially owns 4,615,445.10 shares (~7.6%), exceeding the 5% reporting threshold
- Transparent reporting: Joint filing agreement (Exhibit 99.1) and certification clarify holding purpose and coordinated filing
Negative
- No sole voting or dispositive power: GSAM reports 0 sole voting and 0 sole dispositive power, limiting unilateral control
Insights
TL;DR: GSAM disclosed a notable 7.6% passive stake in Kinetik, with all voting and disposition powers held jointly, not unilaterally.
The Schedule 13G shows Goldman Sachs Asset Management, L.P. beneficially owns 4,615,445.10 Class A shares (7.6%). Key details: sole voting and dispositive powers are zero; shared voting power is 4,543,185.10 and shared dispositive power equals the aggregate ownership. The filer is classified as an investment adviser and certifies the holdings are in the ordinary course of business and not for changing control. This disclosure signals a material institutional stake without asserted intent to exert control.
TL;DR: A material >5% institutional position disclosed; governance influence appears limited given absence of sole control.
The filing documents a material ownership level above the 5% threshold, triggering Schedule 13G reporting. All voting and disposition authority is shared rather than sole, and the certification states the position is not intended to affect control. The inclusion of a joint filing agreement confirms coordinated reporting responsibilities among parties. For governance analysis, the position merits monitoring but the filing itself does not assert activist intent or unilateral control.