
Exhibit 99.1 Highlighting New Data from Our Neuroimmunology Franchise at
AAN April 22, 2026 ©2026 Kyverna Therapeutics, Inc.

Disclaimer and Forward-Looking Statements This presentation contains
forward-looking statements that are based on management’s beliefs and assumptions and information currently available to management of Kyverna Therapeutics, Inc. (“Kyverna”, “we”, “our,” or the
“Company”). All statements other than statements of historical facts contained in this presentation are forward-looking statements. Forward looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements concerning: the Company’s
future results of operations and financial position, business strategy, drug candidates, planned preclinical studies and clinical trials, results of preclinical studies, named-patient access data, ongoing clinical trials, research and development
costs, plans for manufacturing, regulatory approvals, timing and likelihood of success, as well as plans and objectives of management for future operations. These forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties, including the
factors described under the Risk Factors section of the Company’s most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K and Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q that the Company has filed or may subsequently file with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
Actual results could differ materially and adversely from those anticipated or implied in the forward-looking statements. When evaluating Kyverna’s business and prospects, careful consideration should be given to these risks and uncertainties.
These statements speak only as of the date of this presentation, and Kyverna undertakes no obligation to update or revise these statements. This presentation also contains estimates made by independent parties relating to industry market size and
other data. These estimates involve a number of assumptions and limitations and you are cautioned not to give undue weight on such estimates. We have not independently verified the accuracy or completeness of such information, and we do not take any
responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of such information. This presentation contains references to trademarks and marks belonging to other entities. Solely for convenience, trademarks and trade names referred to in this presentation may
appear without the ® or TM symbols, but such references are not intended to indicate, in any way, that the applicable licensor will not assert, to the fullest extent under applicable law, its rights to these trademarks and trade names. The
Company does not intend its use or display of other companies’ trade names, trademarks or service marks to imply a relationship with, or endorsement or sponsorship of the Company by any other companies. This presentation includes results from
named-patient basis access. Similar to expanded access or compassionate use in the United States, “IH” or “Individueller Heilversuch,” also known as “named-patient basis access,” is a regulatory scheme in Germany
that allows for the supply of a treatment that has not received marketing authorization for an individual patient in response to a request by the treating physician on behalf of the named patient. This option can be pursued for the expected benefit
of a patient who has exhausted all available treatment options, under the discretion of the treating physician, with the patient’s consent. The use of miv-cel in the IH settings is not a substitute for, or intended to replace, our clinical
trials. The goal is not to assess the effectiveness of a therapy, but rather to provide an individual patient with a possible efficacious approach when all other treatment options have failed, as determined by the patient’s physician. While we
do not expect to be able to use the results from these activities as the basis for approval in our applications for marketing approval to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) or other foreign regulatory agencies, we believe such activities
may provide additional clinical insights beyond highly focused clinical trials in specific geographies. ©2026 Kyverna Therapeutics, Inc. 2

Today’s Agenda Speakers Solidifying our Leadership in Autoimmune
CAR T Stiff Person Syndrome (SPS) – Primary Analysis Review Warner Biddle Naji Gehchan, M.D., MSc, MBA Chief Executive Officer Chief Medical & Development Officer Generalized Myasthenia Gravis (gMG) – Phase 2 Data Update Advancing
Valuable Market Opportunity in SPS Amanda Piquet, M.D., FAAN Sri Muppidi M.D. University of Colorado Anschutz Stanford Medicine Céline Dion Foundation Endowed Chair Q&A ©2026 Kyverna Therapeutics, Inc. 3

Positioned to Deliver the First Approved Autoimmune CAR T, Miv-cel Lead
indications, SPS and gMG, addressing significant unmet medical need Transformative clinical results reinforce potential to change the treatment paradigm by delivering drug-free, disease-free remission with a single dose BLA submission preparations
underway for SPS, a valuable commercial opportunity Phase 3 gMG trial paves way to significant market opportunity underpinned by miv-cel’s differentiated clinical profile ©2026 Kyverna Therapeutics, Inc. 4

New Data Reinforce Kyverna’s Differentiated Neuroimmunology
Franchise Opportunity SPS Registrational Primary Analysis gMG Phase 2 Longer-Term Follow-Up Further supports path to approval & confidence in launch Further supports confidence in Phase 3 Trial ✓ Statistically significant, durable
clinical ✓ Even deeper responses as data mature, with benefit across all endpoints, with reversal durability out to 52 weeks of disability scores ✓ 100% of patients achieved clinically ✓ New secondary endpoint results and
meaningful response across MG-ADL, translational data demonstrate full QMG, and MGC spectrum of miv-cel clinical benefit ✓ Majority of patients achieved MSE 100% free of immunotherapies and a well-tolerated safety profile SPS – 100%
free of immunotherapies for SPS as of Week 16 and through last follow-up. gMG – 100% free of immunotherapies, including NSISTs, high-dose steroids (>10 mg), and FcRn and complement inhibitors up to 24 weeks. MG-ADL, myasthenia gravis
Activities of Daily Living; MGC, Myasthenia Gravis Composite; MSE, minimal symptom expression; QMG, Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis. ©2026 Kyverna Therapeutics, Inc. 5

Miv-cel: Potential First-in-Class and Best-in-Class CAR T Designed for
Potency & Tolerability 1,2 Mivocabtagene Autoleucel (miv-cel) • More than 100 patients dosed with Fully Human Autologous CD19 CAR T 3 With CD28 Costim miv-cel across multiple indications • Deep and broad depletion of peripheral-
Anti-CD19 scFv and tissue-resident B cells to support broad 4,5 immune reset and durable remission CD8α Hinge 3 • No high-grade CRS or ICANS CD8α TM • First SPS and gMG patients treated with a single dose of miv-cel achieved
durable CD28 Costim efficacy beyond 24 months without the 6 need for chronic immunotherapies CD3ζ CRS, cytokine release syndrome; Costim, co-stimulation; gMG, generalized myasthenia gravis; ICANS, immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity
syndrome; scFv, single-chain fragment variable; TM, transmembrane. 1. Brudno JN, et al. Nat Med. 2020;26:270-280. 2. Alabanza L, et al. Mol Ther. 2017;25:2452-2465. 3.Data on file, Kyverna Therapeutics. 4. Minopoulou I, et al. Ann Rheum
Dis.2025;84(3):e4-e7. 5. Albach FN, et al. ©2026 Kyverna Therapeutics, Inc. 6 Rheumatology. 2025;64(6):4075-4077. 6. Named patient access data, Kyverna Therapeutics.


SPS – Primary Analysis Results from KYSA-8 Registrational Trial
Naji Gehchan, M.D., MSc, MBA – Chief Medical and Development Officer Amanda Piquet, M.D., FAAN – University of Colorado Anschutz, Céline Dion Foundation Endowed Chair ©2026 Kyverna Therapeutics, Inc.

SPS is a Debilitating, Progressive Autoimmune Disease with No
FDA-Approved Therapies SPS impacts the inhibitory signaling Devastating Impact on Patients pathways, which are the body’s braking system and the target of 80% of patients lose mobility, needing autoantibodies produced by B 1-3 walking aid
assistance or wheelchair 1,2 cells in SPS Only ~19% of patients remained able 4 Symptoms characterized by muscle to work after 4 years stiffness and painful muscle spasms, 1-3 “Freezing attacks” and sudden falls impacting mobility 1,2
requiring ER care Inadequate response with off-label Risk of permanent disability and symptomatic and immunomodulatory 3 increased mortality 1,2,5 therapies ER, emergency room. 1. Rakocevic G, et al. BMC Neurol. 2019;19:1. 2. Dalakas MC. Nat Rev
Neurol. 2024;20(10):587-601. 3. Duddy ME, Baker MR. Front Neurol Neurosci. 2009;26:147-165. 4.NCBI. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/books/NBK573078/ ©2026 Kyverna Therapeutics, Inc. 9 5. Dalakas MC. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm.
2023;10(3):e200109.

SPS Natural History Study Reinforces Significant Unmet Medical Need
Large, multicenter, retrospective study assessing T25FW in patients with SPS (n=153) Key Takeaways • Majority of patients had no or limited (<20%) improvement in T25FW • Disability (mRS) did not improve over time • Walking aid
use increased over time • All patients treated with off-label immunomodulators or symptomatic medication Study Contextualizes Transformative Miv-cel Data and Supports the T25FW as a Valid Longitudinal Measure of Mobility in SPS Newsome SD, et
al. Presented at the 2026 AAN Annual Meeting [abstract 966]. ©2026 Kyverna Therapeutics, Inc. 10

Registrational Trial Designed to Support Path to BLA Received Both ODD
and RMAT Designations KYSA-8: Open-label, single-arm, multicenter study N = 26 Primary endpoints: Miv-cel • Age 18 to 75 years • Change from baseline in T25FW at 16 weeks Low-Dose Cy/Flu • Safety • Diagnosis of SPS
lymphodepletion One- • Inadequate response Secondary endpoints: change from + year to immunomodulatory baseline at 16 weeks Single infusion of therapy Follow 8 1×10 CAR T cells • Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) Up • Stiffness
index ≥2 • Distribution of Stiffness Index (DSI) • Hauser Ambulation Index (HAI) • Heightened Sensitivity Scale (HSS) SPS immunotherapies are discontinued Rapid Clinical Enrollment Underscores Significant Unmet Need and
Kyverna’s Ability to Execute Cy/Flu, cyclophosphamide and fludarabine; ODD, Orphan Drug Designation; RMAT, Regenerative Medicine Advanced Therapy; T25FW, timed 25-foot walk test. ©2026 Kyverna Therapeutics, Inc. 11

Primary Endpoint Outcome Assesses Impact of SPS on Walking Ability
Timed 25-Foot Walk (T25FW) 20% improvement 1 • Validated tool to assess walking ability considered clinically 2 1 • Used to evaluate stiffness and loss of mobility in SPS meaningful 3 • Healthy adults can perform the T25FW in ~4-5
seconds T25FW = Average of 2 Walks FIRST WALK TURN AROUND SECOND WALK 25 FEET START/STOP START/STOP 1. Hobart J, et al. Neurology. 2013; 80: 1509-1517. 2. Newsome SD and Johnson T J. Neuroimmunol. 2022;369:577915. 3. Motl RW, et al. Mult Scler J.
2017; 23(5): 704-710. ©2026 Kyverna Therapeutics, Inc. 12

Secondary Endpoint Outcomes Assess Extent of Disability and
SPS-Specific Symptoms Modified Rankin Degree of 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 disability No symptoms Nonsignificant Slight Moderate Severe Death Moderately Scale (mRS) Disability Disability Disability Disability Severe Disability Hauser Time and degree of
assistance to Ambulation 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 2 No symptoms Fatigue Abnormal gait No Support Unilateral Unilateral Bilateral Cannot walk Restricted to Restricted to complete T25FW T25FW ≤10s T25FW ≤20s support support support 25ft WC WC *
† Index (HAI) T25FW ≤20s T25FW >20s T25FW >20s Frequent WC Can self No self transfer use transfer Distribution-of- Muscle stiffness across body 1 point for each stiff body region (0-6) Stiffness 3,4 regions Index (DSI) Number of
Heightened triggers of 1 point for each trigger/stimulus (1-7) Sensitivity Scale muscle 3,4 (HSS) spasms T25FW, timed 25-foot walk; WC, wheelchair. 1. van Swietin JC, et al. Stroke. 1988; 19(5): 604-607. 2. Hauser SL, et al. New Engl J Med. 1983;
308(4): 173-180. 3. Dalakas MC, et al. N Engl J Med. 2001; 345(26): 1870-1876. 4. Dalakas MC, et al. Ann Neurol. 2017; 82(2): 271-277. ©2026 Kyverna Therapeutics, Inc. 13

Primary Endpoint Met: Significant Improvement in T25FW 46% Median
Improvement at Week 16 Significant T25FW Improvement and Reduced Walking Aid Use • 81% of patients achieved clinically meaningful improvement (≥20% 1 reduction from baseline) • 31% completed T25FW in <5 seconds; P = .0003 2
typical time for healthy adults • Of the 12 patients requiring a walking aid for T25FW at baseline, 67% (8/12) no longer needed assistance at week 16 • As of week 16 and through last follow- Baseline 35 None 54 12 up, all 26 (100%)
patients remained n=26 Week 16 Unilateral 85 4 12 free of immunomodulatory or n=26 Bilateral 0 20 40 60 80 100 immunosuppressant therapies for SPS* Patients, % *Includes Includes IVIg/SCIg, PLEX, rituximab and/or prednisone (≥20 mg/day) for
SPS symptoms. Data cutoff: 26Nov2025. Percentages may total more than 100% due to rounding. BL, baseline; T25FW, timed 25-foot walk. 14 1. Hobart J, et al. Neurology. 2013;80(16):1509-17. 2. Motl RW, et al. Mult Scler. 2017;23(5):704-710.

Secondary Endpoints Met: Miv-cel Achieved Significant (P < .0001)
Improvements in Disability, Mobility, Stiffness, and Hypersensitivity Modified Rankin Scale Hauser Ambulation Index 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 • Significant (P < .0001) mean improvements in mRS and HAI of -0.8 (SD, 0.86) and -1.6
(1.13) and SPS- specific measures, DSI and HSS, of -1.5 (1.75) and -3.2 (2.01), respectively • 96% of patients (25/26) had improvement in ≥1 primary or secondary efficacy endpoint Data cutoff: 26Nov2025. Percentages may total more than
100% due to rounding. 15 BL, baseline; DSI, Distribution-of-Stiffness Index; HAI, Hauser Ambulation Scale; HSS, Heightened Sensitivity Scale; mRS, Modified Rankin Scale; wk, week.

Additional Efficacy Measures: Substantial Improvements in Physical and
Mental Functioning 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36): 6-Minute Walk Test (MWT): >4-fold improvement Week 16 scores comparable to healthy adults 1 over clinical minimally important change 2,3 for most domains 89-meter median improvement at
week 16 Data cutoff: 26Nov2025. 16 1. Oosterveer DM, et al. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2022;57:103438. 2. Maglinte GA, et al. J Clin Epidemiol. 2012;65(5):497-502. 3. Wu Q, et al. Medicine (Baltimore). 2023;102(24):e33979.

Robust Miv-cel Expansion Led to Complete Peripheral B-cell Depletion
and Significant Reductions in Autoantibody Titers Robust CAR T-cell Expansion Deep B-cell Depletion Reduced GAD65-IgG P < .0001 Median Median 56% IQR IQR median reduction 750 500 250 0 Baseline Week 16 n=20 n=20 • CAR-positive T cells
peaked by day 14 • 54% of patients had B-cell • GAD65-IgG was reduced reconstitution by week 16 in 19/20 patients with ≥20 nM GAD65 at baseline • Efficacy was maintained with B-cell reconstitution Data cutoff: 26Nov2025. Box
and whisker plots showing median line (dark line), and interquartile range (box), and min/max (bars). 17 CAR, chimeric antigen receptor; IgG, immunoglobulin G; GAD65, glutamic acid decarboxylase 65. GAD65-IgG by RIA, nmol/L

Miv-cel Treatment Induced Markers of Broad Immune Reset B-Cell
Phenotypes Regulatory T Cells Regulatory T Cells Non-Class Switched Class Switched Naïve Memory Memory • Newly emerging B-cell population showed significantly increased • Significant increase in naïve phenotype with concomitant
decrease in memory phenotype regulatory T cells at week 16 Data cutoff: 26Nov2025. Box and whisker plots showing median line (dark line), and interquartile range (box), and min/max (bars). 18 IgD, immunoglobulin D.

Miv-cel Demonstrated a Well-Tolerated Safety Profile • No
high-grade CRS or ICANS observed Treatment-Related Adverse N=26 Events, n (%) • Most common treatment-related AEs were CRS (92%), fatigue (54%), diarrhea (38%), and CRS (any Grade) 24 (92) headache (31%) 10 (38) Grade 1 • 4 patients had
Grade 3/4 neutropenia, an expected AE with lymphodepletion and CAR T-cell therapies Grade 2 14 (54) − All events were manageable with treatment including 3 (12) ICANS (any Grade) G-CSF, fully resolved in 3 patients (median duration of 85
days), and was ongoing in 1 patient Grade 1 3 (12) − No serious infections associated with neutropenia 4 (15) Grade 3/4 neutropenia • Treatment-related serious AEs occurred in 3 patients; Any treatment-related serious AE 3 (12) all fully
resolved without sequalae Data cutoff: 26Nov2025 CRS and ICANS graded using ASTCT criteria; other AEs graded using CTCAE criteria. 19 AE, adverse event; ASTCT, American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy; CAR, chimeric antigen
receptor; CTCAE, Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events; CRS, cytokine release syndrome; ICANS, immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome; LD, lymphodepletion.

Potential to Achieve Durable, Drug-Free, Disease-Free Remission and
Reverse Disability In KYSA-8 trial, a single dose of miv-cel resulted in: Significant, robust, rapid improvements in mobility, disability, stiffness, and hypersensitivity 100% free of immunomodulatory or immunosuppressive therapies for SPS as of
last follow-up A consistent, well-tolerated, and manageable safety profile, with the potential for outpatient administration Sustained clinical benefit following deep B-cell depletion and broad immune reset ©2026 Kyverna Therapeutics, Inc.
20

gMG – Updated Data from Phase 2 KYSA-6 Trial Naji Gehchan, M.D.,
MSc, MBA – Chief Medical and Development Officer Sri Muppidi, M.D. – Stanford University ©2026 Kyverna Therapeutics, Inc.


Despite Available Treatment Options, High Disease Burden Remains in
Generalized Myasthenia Gravis Current State of Treatment • gMG is a B-cell and antibody-mediated for Patients With gMG neuromuscular autoimmune disease that 3,4 causes fluctuating muscle weakness and Inadequate symptom control 1,2 fatigue Few
reach minimal symptom 1,5-6 expression (MSE) Novel therapies are needed that Majority require ongoing minimize or eliminate symptoms of 1-4 immunosuppressant therapy disease while reducing risks associated with chronic immunosuppression Costly and
chronic treatment 1,7 options 1. Howard Jr JF, et al. Lancet Neurol. 2021;20(7):526-536. 2. Vu T, et al. NEJM Evid. 2022;1(5):EVIDoa2100066. 3. DeHart-McCoyle M, et al. BMJ Med. 2023;2(1):e000241. 4. Dewilde S, et al. BMJ Open. 2023;13(1):e066445.
5. AstraZeneca. ULTOMIRIS® efficacy data from CHAMPION-MG. https://ultomirishcp.com/gmg/efficacy. Accessed 20 Aug 2025. 6. Vu T, et al. AAN 2025. S34.002. 7. Data on File, Kyverna Therapeutics. ©2026 Kyverna Therapeutics, Inc.
23

KYSA-6: Phase 2/3 Study of Miv-cel in gMG Phase 2 design: Open-label,
single-arm, multicenter study N = 7 • Age 18 to 75 years Miv-cel Primary endpoints • Diagnosis of gMG, Class IIB-IV per MGFA • MG-ADL at 24 weeks criteria Low-Dose Cy/Flu • Adverse events • Autoantibodies to AChR,
18-month lymphodepletion MuSK, or LRP4 + follow up Key secondary endpoints • MG-ADL ≥6 Single infusion of • QMG and MGC scores 8 1×10 CAR T cells • Failed ≥2 immunosuppressive/ • PK/PD immunomodulatory
therapies OR failed ≥1 immunosuppressive therapy and required chronic plasmapheresis or IVIg to control symptoms MG immunotherapies are discontinued Longer-Term Follow-Up Data Cut Off as of February 25, 2026 AchR, acetylcholine receptor;
Cy/Flu, cyclophosphamide and fludarabine; IVIg, Intravenous Immunoglobulin; LRP4, low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 4; MG-ADL, myasthenia gravis Activities of Daily Living; MGC, Myasthenia Gravis Composite; MGFA, Myasthenia Gravis
Foundation of America; MuSK, muscle-specific kinase; PD, Pharmacodynamics; PK, Pharmacokinetics; ©2026 Kyverna Therapeutics, Inc. 24 QMG, Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis.

Miv-cel Demonstrated Rapid and Robust Reductions in MG-ADL and QMG
Sustained Out to 52 Weeks MG-ADL score QMG score Change from BL Change from BL Baseline Baseline Week 2 Week 24 Week 2 Week 24 Mean MG-ADL 10.6 –6.4 –8.5 Mean QMG 16.9 –8.6 –11.3 Data cutoff: February 25, 2026. 25 BL,
baseline; MG-ADL, myasthenia gravis activities of daily living; QMG, quantitative myasthenia gravis.

After a Single Dose of Miv-cel, Patients Achieved Substantial and
Clinically Meaningful Reductions in MG Outcome Scores and Treatment Burden Substantially improved clinical outcomes MG-ADL QMG 100% had clinically meaningful response 100% had clinically meaningful response (≥3-point reduction vs baseline)
(≥2-point reduction vs baseline) 100% were responders MGC (≥3-point reduction vs baseline) 100% had clinically meaningful response 57% reached MSE at last follow-up (≥3-point reduction vs baseline) (MG-ADL score of 0-1) –16.0
mean reduction at 24 weeks Substantially reduced MG treatment burden 100% free of immunotherapies, including NSISTs, high-dose steroids (>10 mg), and FcRn and complement inhibitors up to 24 weeks 6 of 7 patients remained free of these agents at
last follow-up Data cutoff: February 25, 2026. 26 BL, baseline; FcRn, neonatal fragment crystallizable receptor; MG-ADL, myasthenia gravis activities of daily living; MGC, Myasthenia Gravis Composite; MSE, minimal symptom expression; NSIST,
nonsteroidal immunosuppressive therapy; QMG, quantitative myasthenia gravis.

Miv-cel Demonstrated a Well-Tolerated Safety Profile • No
high-grade CRS and no ICANS observed Treatment-related AEs, n (%) Patients (n=7) • CRS was low-grade and manageable in all patients CRS (any grade) 7 (100) − 5 of 7 patients only experienced fever Grade 1 5 (71) (grade 1 CRS) Grade 2 2
(29) • 2 patients with Grade 3/4 treatment-related AEs ICANS (any grade) 0 (0) of neutropenia; an expected AE with 3 (43) Grade 3/4 events lymphodepletion and CAR T-cell therapies; 2 (29) Neutropenia neither was associated with
infections − 1 patient had transient Grade 4 neutropenia that Lymphopenia 1 (14) resolved within 10 days post-infusion Lymphocyte count decreased 1 (14) − 1 patient had Grade 4 neutropenia was manageable a SAE (any grade) 0 (0)
with G-CSF, and resolved within 2 months post- infusion Data cutoff: February 25, 2026. a After the prior data cut (October 3, 2025), a previously reported treatment-related SAE was reclassified by the Investigator as 'not serious’, reflecting
his clinical assessment of the AE per protocol-defined seriousness criteria. CRS and ICANS graded using ASTCT criteria; other AEs graded using CTCAE criteria. AE, adverse event; ASTCT, American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy; CAR,
chimeric antigen receptor; CTCAE, Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events; CRS, cytokine release syndrome; DLT, dose-limiting toxicity; G-CSF, granulocyte colony- 27 stimulating factor; ICANS, immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity
syndrome; LD, lymphodepletion; SAE, serious adverse event; TEAE, treatment-emergent adverse event.

Robust CAR T-cell Expansion Led to Deep B-cell Depletion Robust CAR
T-cell expansion Deep B-cell depletion • B-cell recovery was detected in 2 patients at weeks 12 and 16, respectively Data cutoff: February 25, 2026. 28 BL, baseline.

Miv-cel Reduced Autoantibody Levels While Preserving Humoral Immune
Responses Reduction of autoantibodies Preservation of humoral immunity Autoantibody Ref Range BL Last visit (Wk) AChR, nmol/L Neg: ≤ 0.3 5.6 0.8 (Wk 52) 20 AChR, nmol/L Neg: ≤ 0.3 71.5 0.7 (Wk 52) MuSK, 1:X Neg: < 1:10 1:1280 1:10 (Wk
12) 0 -25 -50 -75 -100 AChR MuSK BL0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 52 Visit, weeks post-infusion Data cutoff: February 25, 2026. Humoral immunity data was not available for patient 7; dashed line on humoral immunity graph shows the threshold above which
indicates prior exposure or vaccination. 29 AChR, acetylcholine receptor; BL, baseline; IgG, immunoglobulin G; MuSK, muscle-specific kinase; neg, negative value; Ref, reference; Wk, week.. Autoantibodies Percent Change from Baseline, %

Potential to Change the gMG Treatment Paradigm by Delivering Durable,
Drug-Free, Disease-Free Remission In KYSA-6 trial, a single dose of miv-cel resulted in: Robust, rapid, and sustained improvements regardless of prior biologic exposure 100% free of immunotherapies, including NSISTs, high-dose steroids (>10 mg),
and FcRn and complement inhibitors up to 24 weeks Consistent, well-tolerated, and manageable safety profile with no high-grade CRS or ICANS Evidence of immune reset and preserved humoral immunity CRS, cytokine release syndrome; FcRn, neonatal
fragment crystallizable receptor; ICANS, immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome; NSIST, nonsteroidal immunosuppressive therapy. ©2026 Kyverna Therapeutics, Inc. 30

Phase 3 Trial Advancing with First Patients Enrolled and 14 Sites
Activated Globally ~60-patient, global, open-label, randomized controlled Phase 2/3 trial with crossover design Co-Primary Endpoints (MG-ADL & QMG) Miv-cel Low-Dose Cy/Flu lymphodepletion + Screening, 8 Single infusion of 1×10 CAR T cells
Follow Up N = ~60 washout, MG immunotherapies are discontinued apheresis, and Randomized Miv-cel resume standard 1:1 Follow Up Standard of Care Crossover of care Traditional agents or complement pathway inhibitors 24 weeks Baseline 18 Measurement
Months Standard of care may consist of traditional agents (e.g., prednisone, azathioprine, mycophenolate, methotrexate, chronic IVIG/PLEX) or complement pathway inhibitors (e.g., eculizumab, ravulizumab). Anti-CD20 or -CD19 monoclonal antibodies or
FcRn inhibitors not allowed as defined in inclusion criteria. Cy/Flu, cyclophosphamide and fludarabine; FcRn, neonatal fragment crystallizable receptor; IVIG, Intravenous Immunoglobulin; MG-ADL, myasthenia gravis activities of daily living; PLEX,
plasma exchange; QMG, quantitative myasthenia gravis score. ©2026 Kyverna Therapeutics, Inc. 31

Single Dose Miv-cel Achieved Unprecedented gMG Clinical Outcomes
Approved Investigational* All other therapies require chronic background immunotherapies Miv-cel FcRn Complement CD19 BCMA mRNA 1 2,3 4 5 Inhibitor Inhibitor mAb CAR T CD19 CAR T VYVGART® ULTOMIRIS® UPLIZNA® Descartes-08 (KYSA-6, n=6)
4 weeks 6 months 6 months 3 months 6 months Primary Endpoint MG-ADL Reduction ~4.6 3.1 4.2 4.1 8.5 Depth of Response Mean reduction from baseline to primary endpoint QMG Reduction ~6.2 2.8 4.8 3.9 11.3 (non-placebo adjusted) % Responders ~73% ~57%
69% 64% 100% Patients with ≥3-point MG-ADL improvement from baseline to primary endpoint (non-placebo adjusted) Achieve Minimal Symptom Expression 40% 43% Not reported 33% 57% (MSE) At any point before At any point before primary endpoint 6
months to 1 year % of patients achieving MG-ADL of 0 or 1 primary endpoint Note: These observations are derived from separate clinical settings; comparisons across trials are not based on head-to-head studies. BCMA, b-cell maturation antigen; FcRn,
neonatal fragment crystallizable receptor; mAb, monoclonal antibody; MG-ADL, myasthenia gravis activities of daily living; mRNA, messenger RNA; QMG, quantitative myasthenia gravis score. *Under investigation in gMG. © 2025 Kyverna Therapeutics,
Inc. | Confidential – Internal Use Only 32 1. Howard Jr JF, et al. Lancet Neurol. 2021;20(7):526-536. 2. Vu T, et al. NEJM Evid. 2022;1(5):EVIDoa2100066. 3. AstraZeneca. ULTOMIRIS® efficacy data from CHAMPION-MG.
https://ultomirishcp.com/gmg/efficacy. Accessed 20 Aug 2025. 4. Nowak RJ, et al. N Engl J Med. 2025;392(23):2309-2320. 5. Vu T, et al. Nat Med. 2026;32:1131-1141.

Advancing Valuable Market Opportunity in SPS Warner Biddle –
Chief Executive Officer ©2026 Kyverna Therapeutics, Inc.

Miv-cel: Potential to Be First and Only Approved Therapy in SPS with
Patients Ready for an Effective Treatment Option Miv-cel 2,3 Addressable Market Initial Total Miv-cel ~6k Priority Addressable Market U.S. Diagnosed 1,2 ~2.0 to 2.5k Patients ~5.5k Patients SPS Patients 30-40% of total diagnosed 90% of total
diagnosed Patients treated with Patients treated with off-label immunotherapy* symptomatic therapies *Immunotherapy defined as off-label immunosuppressants (e.g., prednisone), rituximab and/or IVIg. IVIg, intravenous immunoglobulin. ©2026
Kyverna Therapeutics, Inc. 34 1. Crane PD, et al. Neurology. 2024;103(12):e210078. 2. Analysis of 2024 Komodo U.S. Claims Data. 3. Kyverna Patient Journey and Demand Study (data on file).

SPS Treaters Show Strong Enthusiasm for Early Adoption of Miv-cel
Survey of 20 high volume Product profile based on SPS treaters in U.S. miv-cel topline data 80% view efficacy data 90% view profile as 85% would use miv-cel and one-time treatment compelling versus current for moderate-to-severe as key attributes
treatment options patients at launch Source: February 2025 Demand and Patient Journey Research; February 2026 Demand Survey. ©2026 Kyverna Therapeutics, Inc. 35

Focused Launch Strategy Targets ~10 High-Value SPS Centers •
Thought leaders / high-volume treaters SPS Leadership • Institutional support for miv-cel • Existing patients ready at center Addressable Patients • Strong referral network • Commercial CAR T experience CAR T Expertise
• Accreditation • Robust inpatient and outpatient models Economic Potential • Commercial payer and Medicare dynamics Meaningful Portion of Immediately Addressable Patients at ~10 Centers PPS, Prospective Payment System. ©2026
Kyverna Therapeutics, Inc. 36

Kyverna: Delivering the Curative Potential of CAR T in Autoimmune
Diseases Best-in-Class Profile CAR T Leadership Focused Strategy Demonstrated durable drug- Potentially first approved Neuroimmunology-led free, disease-free remission autoimmune CAR T franchise Pipeline-in-a-Product Strong Financial Position
Valuable Commercial Clinical data supports Supporting SPS BLA submission, Opportunity in SPS expansion into broader anticipated commercial launch Immediately addressable indications and gMG Phase 3 trial market and premium pricing potential
©2026 Kyverna Therapeutics, Inc. 37

Warner Biddle Marc Grasso, M.D. Naji Gehchan, M.D., MSc, MBA Chief
Executive Officer Chief Financial Officer Chief Medical & Development Officer Q&A Amanda Piquet, M.D., FAAN Sri Muppidi M.D. University of Colorado Anschutz Stanford Medicine Céline Dion Foundation Endowed Chair ©2026 Kyverna
Therapeutics, Inc.