Vanguard disaggregates holdings; Mirum (MIRM) shows 0 shares owned
Rhea-AI Filing Summary
Mirum Pharmaceuticals Inc received an Amendment No. 1 Schedule 13G/A from The Vanguard Group describing an internal realignment under SEC Release No. 34-39538 (January 12, 1998). The filing states Vanguard and certain subsidiaries will report disaggregated holdings and that those subsidiaries pursue the same investment strategies. The filing reports amount beneficially owned: 0 and percent of class: 0% for Mirum common stock. The statement is signed by Ashley Grim, Head of Global Fund Administration, dated 03/27/2026.
Positive
- None.
Negative
- None.
Insights
Vanguard disaggregated holdings and reports zero beneficial ownership in Mirum common stock.
The submission cites an internal realignment and reliance on SEC Release No. 34-39538 (January 12, 1998), leading certain subsidiaries or business divisions to report separately. The filing explicitly lists Amount beneficially owned: 0 and Percent of class: 0%.
Cash-flow treatment or future trading intentions are not disclosed in the excerpt; subsequent filings from Vanguard or the listed subsidiaries would show any resumed beneficial ownership.
The filing documents administrative reallocation of reporting responsibility, not a change in investment strategy.
Vanguard states the affected subsidiaries "pursue the same investment strategies as previously pursued" and that Vanguard "no longer has, or is deemed to have, beneficial ownership" of those subsidiaries' holdings per the cited release. This is a reporting/organizational disclosure rather than a transaction in Mirum shares.
Share counts and voting/dispositive powers are all reported as 0 in Item 4; the signature date is 03/27/2026.
FAQ
What does the Schedule 13G/A from The Vanguard Group say about MIRM ownership?
Why did Vanguard change how it reports Mirum (MIRM) holdings?
Does the filing show Vanguard has voting or dispositive power over Mirum shares?
Who signed the Schedule 13G/A for Vanguard and when?
Does Vanguard state it still controls subsidiary holdings after the realignment?