[DEF 14A] Midland States Bancorp, Inc. Definitive Proxy Statement

Rhea-AI Filing Summary

Foghorn Therapeutics Inc. (FHTX) has restructured its real-estate footprint, according to a Form 8-K filed on 1 July 2025.

New Watertown headquarters. On 27 June 2025 the company signed a 108-month lease with ARE-MA Region No. 77, LLC for 72,846 sq ft at 99 Coolidge Avenue, Watertown, MA. The premises will serve as the principal executive offices and support R&D, manufacturing and related activities.

• Lease commencement: 16 July 2025; base rent starts 9.5 months after delivery (targeted 1 Oct 2026).
• Year 1 base rent: $3.9 million (45,000 RSF).
• Year 2 base rent: ≈$5.2 million (60,000 RSF).
• Year 3 base rent: ≈$6.3 million; thereafter 3 % annual escalator beginning 1 Oct 2027.
• Tenant share of operating & tax expenses: ≈22.71 %.
• Two successive 5-year extension options.

Termination of Cambridge lease. Simultaneously, Foghorn executed an agreement with ARE-Tech Square, LLC to end its 81,441 sq ft lease at 500 Technology Square, Cambridge—originally set to run through 30 Sep 2028. The company will pay all rent and other amounts due through the agreed termination date.

Overall, the filing outlines a planned relocation from Cambridge to a purpose-built Watertown facility with staged rent obligations and optional extensions, replacing a larger, costlier lease that would otherwise have run for three additional years.

Positive

• Long-term facility secured with two 5-year extension options, supporting strategic growth.
• First-year rent abatement to $3.9 m delays cash outflow until after key development milestones.

Negative

• 9-year fixed rent obligation with 3 % annual escalators increases future fixed costs.
• Obligation to pay remaining rent on the terminated Cambridge lease could generate near-term cash drag.

Insights

Real-Estate Analyst

TL;DR: FHTX swaps an expiring Cambridge lease for a new Watertown HQ with staged rent, moderate escalators and extension options—financial impact appears neutral.

The 72.8 k sq ft Watertown lease provides long-term operational stability and consolidates functions under one roof. First-year rent of $3.9 m represents an abatement relative to market rates and previous obligations, giving the company flexibility during build-out. Annual escalations are a standard 3 %, while the 22.71 % share of operating expenses is in line with comparable biotech leases in Greater Boston. Two 5-year options preserve optionality without penalty. Early termination of the larger 81.4 k sq ft Cambridge lease removes an obligation that would have persisted to 2028, though Foghorn must still pay rent through the negotiated exit date. Net impact is operationally positive but financially neutral until rent commences in late 2026.

Equity Research Analyst

TL;DR: Relocation reallocates cash flows; no immediate P&L effect, but establishes predictable facility costs for nine years.

The transaction does not alter revenue guidance or near-term expense run-rate, as cash rent starts after October 2026. However, investors gain visibility into future occupancy costs: approximately $6.3 m in FY-2027 rising 3 % annually thereafter. Because the Cambridge lease was already an existing liability, the shift mainly changes timing and location of payments. With 18-24 months before rent accrues, Foghorn preserves cash during clinical milestones. Absent disclosed termination penalties or overlapping rent periods, the event is unlikely to change valuation models meaningfully, rendering the overall market impact neutral.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

(RULE 14a-101)​

INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Filed by the Registrant ☒

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ☐

Check the appropriate box:

☐

Preliminary Proxy Statement

​

☐

Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

​

☒

Definitive Proxy Statement

​

☐

Definitive Additional Materials

​

☐

Soliciting Material under §240.14a-12

​

MIDLAND STATES BANCORP, INC.

​

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)​

​

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check all boxes that apply):

☒

No fee required

​

☐

Fee paid previously with preliminary materials

​

☐

Fee computed on table in exhibit required by Item 25(b) per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11

​

TABLE OF CONTENTS

NOTICE OF
ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
TO BE HELD AUGUST 4, 2025

To the shareholders of Midland States Bancorp, Inc.:

The annual meeting of the shareholders of Midland States Bancorp, Inc., an Illinois corporation, will be held at the Holiday Inn that is located at 1301 Avenue of Mid-America, Effingham, Illinois 62401, on Monday, August 4, 2025, at 5:30 p.m., local time, for the following purposes:

1.

To elect the three nominees named in the accompanying proxy statement to serve as Class III directors, each for a term expiring at the 2028 annual meeting of shareholders.

​

2.

To approve, on a non-binding, advisory basis, the compensation of certain executive officers, which we refer to as the “say-on-pay proposal.”

​

3.

To approve, on a non-binding, advisory basis, the frequency with which shareholders will vote on future say-on-pay proposals, which we refer to as the “say-on-frequency proposal.”

​

4.

To ratify the appointment of Crowe LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2025, which we refer to as the “auditor ratification proposal.”

​

The board of directors has fixed the close of business on June 6, 2025, as the record date for the determination of shareholders entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the meeting. If there is an insufficient number of votes for a quorum or to approve or ratify any of the foregoing proposals at the time of the meeting, the meeting may be adjourned or postponed to permit our further solicitation of proxies.

By order of the Board of Directors,

Jeffrey C. Smith
Chairman

Effingham, Illinois
July 1, 2025

YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT. PLEASE EXERCISE YOUR SHAREHOLDER RIGHT TO VOTE, REGARDLESS OF WHETHER YOU PLAN TO ATTEND THE ANNUAL MEETING.

TABLE OF CONTENTS​

Table of Contents

​	GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING	​	​	​	​	3	​	​
​	CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS	​	​	​	​	7	​	​
​	Committees of the Board of Directors	​	​	​	​	7	​	​
​	Shareholder Communication with the Board, Nomination and Proposal Procedures	​	​	​	​	10	​	​
​	Board Leadership Structure	​	​	​	​	11	​	​
​	Independent Director Sessions	​	​	​	​	11	​	​
​	Board’s Role in Risk Oversight	​	​	​	​	11	​	​
​	Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation	​	​	​	​	12	​	​
​	Code of Business Conduct and Ethics	​	​	​	​	12	​	​
​	Anti-Hedging Policy	​	​	​	​	12	​	​
​	Board Diversity	​	​	​	​	12	​	​
​	Director Compensation	​	​	​	​	13	​	​
​	CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITY	​	​	​	​	14	​	​
​	PROPOSAL 1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS	​	​	​	​	15	​	​
​	COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS	​	​	​	​	21	​	​
​	EXECUTIVE SUMMARY	​	​	​	​	21	​	​
​	2024 Compensation Highlights	​	​	​	​	21	​	​
​	Compensation Best Practices	​	​	​	​	21	​	​
​	Prior Year’s Say-on-Pay Vote	​	​	​	​	22	​	​
​	WHAT GUIDES OUR PROGRAM	​	​	​	​	22	​	​
​	Compensation Philosophy and Objectives	​	​	​	​	22	​	​
​	Elements of Compensation	​	​	​	​	23	​	​
​	Pay Mix	​	​	​	​	23	​	​
​	The Decision-Making Process	​	​	​	​	24	​	​
​	2024 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PROGRAM IN DETAIL	​	​	​	​	25	​	​
​	Base Salary	​	​	​	​	25	​	​
​	Annual Incentive Bonus — Corporate Bonus Plan	​	​	​	​	25	​	​
​	Long-Term Equity Incentive Awards	​	​	​	​	27	​	​
​	OTHER PRACTICES, POLICIES & GUIDELINES	​	​	​	​	27	​	​
​	Anti-Hedging Policy	​	​	​	​	28	​	​
​	Clawback Policy	​	​	​	​	28	​	​
​	Benefits and Other Perquisites	​	​	​	​	28	​	​
​	Regulatory Impact on Compensation	​	​	​	​	28	​	​
​	COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT	​	​	​	​	30	​	​
​	EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION	​	​	​	​	31	​	​
​	Summary Compensation Table	​	​	​	​	31	​	​
​	Grants of Plan-Based Awards	​	​	​	​	32	​	​
​	Outstanding Equity Awards	​	​	​	​	33	​	​
​	Option Exercises and Stock Vested in 2024	​	​	​	​	34	​	​
​	Nonqualified Deferred Compensation	​	​	​	​	34	​	​
​	Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control	​	​	​	​	35	​	​
​	Employment Agreements	​	​	​	​	36	​	​

i

TABLE OF CONTENTS​

​	Long Term Incentive Plans	​	​	​	​	38	​	​
​	Other Compensation Programs	​	​	​	​	39	​	​
​	CEO Pay Ratio	​	​	​	​	40	​	​
​	PAY VERSUS PERFORMANCE DISCLOSURE	​	​	​	​	42	​	​
​	PROPOSAL 2 — ADVISORY (NON-BINDING) VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION	​	​	​	​	47	​	​
​	SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS	​	​	​	​	48	​	​
​	CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS	​	​	​	​	51	​	​
​	AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT	​	​	​	​	52	​	​
​	PROPOSAL 3 — ADVISORY (NON-BINDING) VOTE ON FREQUENCY OF SHAREHOLDER VOTES ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION	​	​	​	​	53	​	​
​	PROPOSAL 4 — RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF CROWE LLP AS OUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM	​	​	​	​	54	​	​
​	General	​	​	​	​	54	​	​
​	Accountant Fees	​	​	​	​	54	​	​
​	Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policy	​	​	​	​	54	​	​

ii

TABLE OF CONTENTS​

MIDLAND STATES BANCORP, INC.
PROXY STATEMENT
ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
AUGUST 4, 2025

These proxy materials are furnished in connection with the solicitation by the board of directors of Midland States Bancorp, Inc., an Illinois corporation (the “Company”) and the holding company of Midland States Bank (the “Bank”), of proxies to be used at the 2025 annual meeting of shareholders of the Company, to be held at the Holiday Inn that is located at 1301 Avenue of Mid-America, Effingham, Illinois 62401, on Monday, August 4, 2025, at 5:30 p.m., local time, and at any adjournments or postponements of such meeting. A complete list of the shareholders entitled to vote at the 2025 annual meeting of shareholders is kept on file at the Company’s principal executive offices, located at 1201 Network Centre Drive, Effingham, Illinois 62401. These proxy materials are being mailed to shareholders of record on July 1, 2025.

GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING

The following is information regarding the meeting and the voting process, presented in a question and answer format.

Why did I receive the proxy materials?

According to our records, on June 6, 2025, the record date for the annual meeting, you owned shares of our common stock. This proxy statement describes the matters that will be presented for consideration by the shareholders at the meeting. It also gives you information concerning those matters to assist you in making an informed decision.

What matters will be voted on at the meeting?

You are being asked to vote on: (i) the election of the three nominees named in this proxy statement to serve as Class III directors, each for a term expiring at the 2028 annual meeting of shareholders; (ii) the approval, on a non-binding, advisory basis, of the say-on-pay proposal; (iii) the approval, on a non-binding, advisory basis, of the say-on-frequency proposal; and (iv) the approval of the auditor ratification proposal. These matters are more fully described in this proxy statement.

What are the board’s voting recommendations?

The board recommends that you vote your shares:

•

“FOR” the election of each of the director nominees named in this proxy statement;

​

•

“FOR” the say-on-pay proposal;

​

•

“EVERY YEAR” for the say-on-frequency proposal; and

​

•

“FOR” the auditor ratification proposal.

​

If I am the record holder of my shares, how do I vote?

If your shares are registered directly in your name with the Company’s transfer agent, Computershare, Inc., there are four ways to vote:

•

Via the Internet.   You may vote by proxy via the internet by following the instructions provided on your proxy card.

​

•

By Telephone.   You may vote by proxy by calling the toll free number found on your proxy card.

​

•

By Mail.   You may vote by proxy by filling out the proxy card and returning it in the envelope provided.

​

•

In Person.   You may vote in person at the meeting by requesting a ballot when you arrive. You must bring valid picture identification, such as a driver’s license or passport, and may be requested to provide proof of stock ownership as of the record date.

​

3

TABLE OF CONTENTS

If I am a beneficial owner of the Company’s shares held in street name, how do I vote?

If you are a beneficial owner of shares held in street name (such as if you hold your shares through a broker, trustee or other fiduciary), then that organization will instruct you as to how your shares may be voted by proxy, including whether telephone or internet voting options are available. If you are a beneficial owner of shares held in street name and wish to vote in person at the meeting, you must obtain a “legal proxy” from the organization that holds your shares. A legal proxy is a written document that will authorize you to vote your shares held in street name at the meeting. Please contact the organization that holds your shares for instructions regarding obtaining a legal proxy. You must bring a copy of the legal proxy to the meeting and ask for a ballot from an usher when you arrive. You must also bring valid picture identification, such as a driver’s license or a passport. For your vote to be counted, you must hand both the copy of the legal proxy and your completed ballot to an usher to be provided to the inspector of election.

What happens if I do not give specific voting instructions?

Shareholders of Record.   If you are a shareholder of record and you: (i) indicate when voting on the internet or by telephone that you wish to vote as recommended by the board; or (ii) sign, date and return a proxy card without giving specific voting instructions as to a particular matter; then the persons named as proxy holders will vote your shares in the manner recommended by the board on all such matters presented in this proxy statement and as the proxy holders may determine in their judgment with respect to any other matters properly presented for a vote at the meeting.

Beneficial Owners of Shares Held in Street Name.   If you are a beneficial owner of shares held in street name and do not provide the organization that holds your shares with specific voting instructions, then, under applicable rules, the organization that holds your shares may generally vote on “routine” matters but cannot vote on “non-routine” matters. If the organization that holds your shares does not receive instructions from you on how to vote your shares on a non-routine matter, that organization will inform the inspector of election that it does not have the authority to vote on this matter with respect to your shares. This is generally referred to as a “broker non-vote.”

At the meeting, the election of directors, the say-on-pay proposal and the say-on-frequency proposal are considered non-routine matters, but the auditor ratification proposal is considered a routine matter.

If I hold shares in the Amended and Restated Midland States Bancorp, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan, who votes my shares?

If you are a holder of stock in the Amended and Restated Midland States Bancorp, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “ESPP”), you can direct the service provider of the ESPP (the “Service Provider”) how to vote the number of shares you hold in the ESPP for each proposal included in this proxy statement. If you do not provide timely voting directions to the Service Provider, then the shares held for your benefit in the ESPP shall be voted in accordance with the recommendations of the board.

What options do I have in voting on each of the proposals?

You may vote “FOR,” “AGAINST” or “ABSTAIN” with respect to the election of each director nominee, the say-on-pay proposal and the auditor ratification proposal, and with respect to any other proposal not described in this proxy statement that may properly be brought before the meeting. You may vote “EVERY YEAR,” “EVERY TWO YEARS” or “EVERY THREE YEARS” with respect to the say-on-frequency proposal.

How many votes may I cast?

You are entitled to cast one vote for each share of common stock you owned on the record date.

What is the quorum required for each matter?

The holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of the Company entitled to vote on each matter represented in person or by proxy will constitute a quorum for purposes of such matter at the meeting. If less than a majority of the outstanding shares are represented at the meeting, a majority of the shares

4

TABLE OF CONTENTS

represented may adjourn the meeting at any time. On June 6, 2025, the record date, there were 21,879,916 shares of common stock issued and outstanding and entitled to vote.

A list of shareholders entitled to vote at the meeting will be available for inspection by shareholders within 20 days after the record date at the Company’s office located at 1201 Network Centre Drive, Effingham, Illinois 62401.

Broker non-votes will count for purposes of determining whether or not a quorum is present since a routine matter (the auditor ratification proposal) is on the proxy ballot. Similarly, abstentions will also count in determining the presence of a quorum.

How many votes are needed for approval of each proposal?

With respect to the election of directors, if a majority of the shares represented at the meeting and entitled to vote on such proposal are voted “FOR” any nominee, he or she will be elected as a director to serve until the Company’s 2028 annual meeting of shareholders, or until his or her earlier resignation or removal.

With respect to the say-on-pay proposal, if a majority of the shares represented at the meeting and entitled to vote on such proposal are voted “FOR” the proposal, such proposal will be approved. Please note, however, that because the say-on-pay proposal is advisory, the outcome of such vote will not be binding on the board of directors or the Compensation Committee.

With respect to the say-on-frequency proposal, the frequency receiving the most votes will be considered the choice of the shareholders. Please note, however, that because the say-on-frequency proposal is advisory, the outcome of such vote will not be binding on the board of directors.

With respect to the auditor ratification proposal, if a majority of the shares represented at the meeting and entitled to vote on such proposal are voted “FOR” the proposal, such proposal will be approved.

How are abstentions and broker non-votes treated?

With respect to the election of directors, a vote to “ABSTAIN” will have the effect of a vote “AGAINST” the applicable nominee. A broker non-vote will not be treated as entitled to vote on the proposal, and therefore will not have an effect on the election of a nominee.

With respect to the say-on-pay proposal, a vote to “ABSTAIN” will have the effect of a vote “AGAINST” the proposal. A broker non-vote will not be treated as entitled to vote on the proposal, and therefore will not have an effect on the proposal.

With respect to the say-on-frequency proposal, neither an abstention nor a broker non-vote will be considered when determining the frequency receiving the most votes.

With respect to the auditor ratification proposal, a vote to “ABSTAIN” will have the effect of a vote “AGAINST” the proposal.

To minimize the number of broker non-votes, the Company encourages you to vote or to provide voting instructions with respect to each proposal to the organization that holds your shares by carefully following the instructions provided.

What if I change my mind after I return my proxy?

You may revoke your proxy and change your vote at any time prior to the taking of the vote at the meeting. Prior to the applicable cutoff time, you may change your vote using the internet or telephone methods described above, in which case only your latest internet or telephone proxy submitted prior to the meeting will be counted. You may also revoke your proxy and change your vote by signing and returning a new proxy card or voting instruction form dated as of a later date, or by attending the meeting and voting in person. However, your attendance at the meeting will not automatically revoke your proxy unless you properly vote at the meeting or specifically request that your prior proxy be revoked by delivering a written notice of revocation to the Company’s Secretary at 1201 Network Centre Drive, Effingham, Illinois 62401, prior to the meeting.

5

TABLE OF CONTENTS

What happens if a nominee is unable to stand for election?

The board may, by resolution, provide for a lesser number of directors or designate a substitute nominee. In the latter case, shares represented by proxies may be voted for a substitute nominee. Proxies cannot be voted for more than three nominees. The board has no reason to believe any nominee will be unable to stand for election.

Who will serve as the inspector of election?

A representative of the Company is expected to serve as the inspector of election.

Where do I find the voting results of the meeting?

If available, we will announce voting results at the meeting. The voting results will also be disclosed in a filing we will make with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) within four business days after the annual meeting.

Who bears the cost of soliciting proxies?

We will bear the cost of soliciting proxies. In addition to solicitations by mail, officers, directors or employees of the Company or its subsidiaries may solicit proxies in person or by telephone. These persons will not receive any special or additional compensation for soliciting proxies. In addition, we have engaged Georgeson LLC to solicit proxies of institutional investors, for an anticipated cost of $15,000. We may reimburse brokerage houses and other custodians, nominees and fiduciaries for their reasonable out-of-pocket expenses for forwarding proxy and solicitation material to shareholders.

6

TABLE OF CONTENTS​​

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

We currently have ten directors serving as our board, a majority of whom we have determined to be “independent,” as that term is defined by the rules of the Nasdaq Stock Market.

Our board of directors has evaluated the independence of its members based upon the rules of the Nasdaq Stock Market and the SEC. Applying these standards, our board of directors has affirmatively determined that, with the exception of Mr. Ludwig, each of our current directors is an independent director, as defined under the applicable rules. The board determined that Mr. Ludwig does not qualify as an independent director because he is an executive officer of the Company.

Generally, the board oversees our business and monitors the performance of our management. In accordance with our corporate governance procedures, the board does not involve itself in the day-to-day operations of the Company, which are monitored by our executive officers and management. Our directors fulfill their duties and responsibilities by attending regular meetings of the full board, with additional special meetings held from time to time. Our directors also discuss business and other matters with Mr. Ludwig, other key executives and our principal external advisers (legal counsel, auditors and other consultants) at times other than regularly scheduled meetings when appropriate.

The board held nine meetings during 2024. In 2025, the full board intends to hold eight regularly scheduled meetings with special meetings held from time to time when necessary and through committee membership, which is discussed below. During 2024, all directors attended at least 75 percent of the meetings of the board and the committees on which they served. Although we do not have a formal policy regarding director attendance at the annual meeting of shareholders, we encourage and expect all of our directors to attend. Last year, all but one of our current directors serving at that time was present at the annual meeting of shareholders.

Committees of the Board of Directors

Our board of directors has established standing committees in connection with the discharge of its responsibilities. These committees include the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, Risk Policy & Compliance Committee and Executive Committee. Our board of directors also may establish such other committees as it deems appropriate, in accordance with applicable law and regulations and our articles and bylaws.

The current charters of the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee are available on the Company’s website at www.midlandsb.com under “Investors — Corporate Governance — Governance Highlights.” The table below shows the current membership of each of the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee:

Directors	​	​	Audit Committee	​	​	Compensation Committee	​	​	Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee	​
Jeffrey C. Smith	​	​	​	​	​	X	​	​	X	​
Jeffrey G. Ludwig	​	​	​	​	​	​	​	​	​	​
R. Dean Bingham	​	​	​	​	​	​	​	​	X	​
Gerald J. Carlson	​	​	Chair	​	​	​	​	​	​	​
Jennifer L. DiMotta	​	​	​	​	​	X	​	​	X	​
Travis J. Franklin	​	​	​	​	​	​	​	​	​	​
Jerry L. McDaniel	​	​	X	​	​	​	​	​	Chair	​
Jeffrey M. McDonnell	​	​	X	​	​	​	​	​	​	​
Richard T. Ramos	​	​	X	​	​	Chair	​	​	​	​
Robert F. Schultz	​	​		​	​		​	​		​
Meetings Held in 2024	​	​	9	​	​	5	​	​	4	​

7

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Audit Committee.   Our Audit Committee currently consists of Gerald J. Carlson (Chair), Jerry L. McDaniel, Jeffrey M. McDonnell and Richard T. Ramos. Our board of directors has evaluated the independence of the members of our Audit Committee and has affirmatively determined that: (i) each of the members of our Audit Committee meets the definition of “independent director” under Nasdaq Stock Market rules; (ii) each of the members satisfies the additional independence standards under Nasdaq Stock Market rules and applicable SEC rules for audit committee service; and (iii) each of the members has the ability to read and understand fundamental financial statements. In addition, our board of directors has determined that Mr. Ramos has the required financial sophistication due to his experience and background, which Nasdaq Stock Market rules require at least one such Audit Committee member have. Our board has determined that Mr. Ramos also qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert,” as that term is defined under applicable SEC rules.

Our Audit Committee has adopted a written charter, which sets forth the committee’s duties and responsibilities. The current charter of the Audit Committee is available on our website at www.midlandsb.com under “Investors — Corporate Governance — Governance Highlights.” As described in its charter, our Audit Committee has responsibility for, among other things:

•

selecting and reviewing the independence, qualifications and performance of our independent auditors and approving, in advance, all engagements and fee arrangements;

​

•

reviewing on a quarterly basis a summary of findings from completed internal audits, and a progress report on the proposed internal audit plans, with explanations for any deviations from the original plan as well as disposition of audit recommendations;

​

•

reviewing and discussing with management, the internal auditors and the independent auditors the effectiveness of our system of internal control and internal audit procedures;

​

•

reviewing and discussing with management and the independent auditor the annual audited and quarterly unaudited financial statements, including disclosures made in management’s discussion and analysis, earnings press releases and any earnings guidance provided to analysts and rating agencies, prior to the release of quarterly and annual earnings results;

​

•

discussing with management and the independent auditor any correspondence with regulators or governmental agencies and any published reports that raise material issues regarding the Company’s financial statements or accounting policies;

​

•

reviewing and approving all material related party transactions; and

​

•

handling such other matters that are specifically delegated to the Audit Committee by our board of directors from time to time.

​

Our Audit Committee also administers the Company’s clawback policy, which provides for the recovery of certain performance-based compensation under certain circumstances involving an accounting restatement, under authority delegated to it by our board of directors.

Compensation Committee.   Our Compensation Committee currently consists of Richard T. Ramos (Chair), Jennifer L. DiMotta and Jeffrey C. Smith. Our board of directors has evaluated the independence of the members of our Compensation Committee and has affirmatively determined that each of the members of our Compensation Committee is “independent” under applicable SEC and Nasdaq Stock Market rules.

Our Compensation Committee has adopted a written charter, which sets forth the committee’s duties and responsibilities. The current charter of the Compensation Committee is available on our website at www.midlandsb.com under “Investors — Corporate Governance — Governance Highlights.” As described in its charter, our Compensation Committee has responsibility for, among other things:

•

reviewing, monitoring and approving our overall compensation structure, policies and programs (including benefit plans) and assessing whether the compensation structure establishes appropriate incentives for our executive officers and other employees and meets our corporate objectives;

​

•

determining the annual compensation of our Chief Executive Officer;

​

•

reviewing the compensation decisions made by our Chief Executive Officer with respect to our other named executive officers;

​

8

TABLE OF CONTENTS

•

reviewing and approving all employment agreements, severance arrangements and change-in-control agreements or provisions for the Chief Executive Officer and any other named executive officer;

​

•

overseeing the administration of our equity plans and other incentive compensation plans and programs and preparing recommendations and periodic reports to our board of directors relating to these matters;

​

•

reviewing the management succession plans of the Company;

​

•

determining whether to retain or obtain the advice of a compensation consultant, legal counsel or other adviser and to oversee the appointment, compensation and work of any such adviser; and

​

•

handling such other matters that are specifically delegated to the Compensation Committee by our board of directors from time to time.

​

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.   Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee currently consists of Jerry L. McDaniel (Chair), R. Dean Bingham, Jennifer L. DiMotta and Jeffrey C. Smith. Our board of directors has evaluated the independence of the members of our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and has affirmatively determined that each of the members of our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is “independent” under Nasdaq Stock Market rules.

Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee has adopted a written charter, which sets forth the committee’s duties and responsibilities. The current charter of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is available on our website at www.midlandsb.com under “Investors — Corporate Governance — Governance Highlights.” As described in its charter, our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee has responsibility for, among other things:

•

identifying qualified individuals to serve as directors of the Company and recommending to the Company’s board of directors the nomination or appointment of such individuals;

​

•

monitoring the functioning of our standing committees and recommending any changes with respect to the assignment of individual directors to such committees;

​

•

developing, reviewing and monitoring compliance with our corporate governance guidelines;

​

•

reviewing annually the composition of our board of directors as a whole and making recommendations; and

​

•

handling such other matters that are specifically delegated to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee by our board of directors from time to time.

​

Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee strives to recommend candidates for director positions who will create a collective membership on the board of directors with varied experience and perspective and who maintain a board that reflects diversity, including but not limited to gender, ethnicity, background, country of citizenship and experience.

In carrying out its nominating functions, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee has developed qualification criteria for all potential director nominees, including incumbent directors, board nominees and shareholder nominees included in the proxy statement. These criteria include the following attributes:

•

the highest personal and professional ethics, integrity and values;

​

•

sufficient educational and professional experience, business experience or comparable service on other boards of directors to qualify the nominee for service to the board;

​

•

exemplary management and communication skills;

​

•

contribution to the board’s goals of having a diverse range of backgrounds, views, experiences, talents and skills in the boardroom;

​

•

evidence of effective leadership and sound judgment in the nominee’s professional life;

​

•

a willingness to meet the standards and duties set forth in the Company’s Code of Business Conduct and Ethics; and

​

9

TABLE OF CONTENTS​

•

a willingness and ability to devote sufficient time to carrying out the duties and responsibilities required of a board member, and a commitment to serving on the board for an extended period of time.

​

The committee also evaluates potential nominees to determine if they have any conflicts of interest that may interfere with their ability to serve as effective board members and to determine whether they are “independent” in accordance with Nasdaq Stock Market rules to ensure that, at all times, at least a majority of our directors are independent. Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee evaluates all candidates in the same way, reviewing the aforementioned factors, among others, regardless of the source of such candidates, including shareholder recommendations. Because of this, there is no separate policy with regard to the consideration of candidates recommended by shareholders.

Prior to nominating an existing director for re-election to the board, the committee will consider and review the following attributes with respect to each existing director:

•

board and committee attendance and performance;

​

•

length of board service;

​

•

experience, skills and contributions that the existing director brings to the board;

​

•

independence and any conflicts of interest; and

​

•

any significant change in the director’s professional status or work experience, including the attributes considered for initial board membership.

​

Shareholder Communication with the Board, Nomination and Proposal Procedures

General Communications with the Board.   Shareholders may contact our board of directors by contacting Nathan D. Sturycz, Secretary, Midland States Bancorp, Inc. at 1201 Network Centre Drive, Effingham, Illinois 62401 or (217) 342-7321.

Nominations of Directors.   In accordance with our bylaws, a shareholder may nominate a director for election at an annual meeting of shareholders by delivering written notice of the nomination to our Secretary, at the above address, not less than 90 days nor more than 120 days prior to the annual meeting. However, if less than 100 days’ notice or prior public disclosure of the date of the annual meeting is given to shareholders, then written notice of the nomination must be delivered to our Secretary no later than the close of business on the 10th day following the day on which such notice of the date of the annual meeting was mailed or such public disclosure was made.

In the case of our 2025 annual meeting of shareholders on August 4, 2025, notice of any such nomination must be delivered to our Secretary no later than July 11, 2025. We anticipate holding our 2026 annual meeting of shareholders on May 4, 2026. As a result, notice of nominations for directors to be elected at the 2026 annual meeting of shareholders must be delivered to our Secretary no earlier than January 4, 2026, and no later than February 3, 2026. The shareholder’s notice to the Secretary must include: (a) the name and address of record of the nominating shareholder; (b) a representation that the nominating shareholder is a holder of record of shares of the Company entitled to vote at such meeting and intends to appear in person or by proxy at the meeting to nominate the persons specified in the notice; (c) the name, age, business and residence addresses, and principal occupation or employment of each nominee; (d) a description of all arrangements or understandings between the nominating shareholder and each nominee and any other person (naming such person) pursuant to which the nominations are to be made by the nominating shareholder; (e) such other information regarding each nominee proposed by such nominating shareholder as is required to be included in a proxy statement filed pursuant to the proxy rules of the SEC, as in effect; and (f) the consent of each nominee to serve as a director of the Company if so elected. Persons nominated for election to the board pursuant to this paragraph will not be included in our proxy statement, unless they are also submitted in accordance with the requirements described under “Other Shareholder Proposals,” below.

Other Shareholder Proposals.   To be considered for inclusion in our proxy statement and form of proxy for our 2026 annual meeting of shareholders, shareholder proposals must be received by our Secretary, at the above address a reasonable time before we begin to print and send our proxy materials, or by

10

TABLE OF CONTENTS​​​

November  23, 2025, which is 120 days prior to the date we expect to release to shareholders our proxy statement for the 2026 annual meeting of shareholders., and must otherwise comply with the notice and other provisions of our bylaws, as well as SEC rules and regulations.

For proposals to be otherwise brought by a shareholder and voted upon at an annual meeting, the shareholder must file written notice of the proposal to our Secretary not less than 90 days nor more than 120 days prior to the annual meeting. However, that if less than 100 days’ notice of the date of the annual meeting is given to shareholders, then written notice of the proposal must be delivered to our Secretary no later than the close of business on the 10th day following the day on which such notice of the date of the annual meeting was mailed to shareholders.

In the case of our 2025 annual meeting of shareholders on August 4, 2025, notice of shareholder proposals to be brought at the meeting must be delivered to our Secretary no later than July 11, 2025. We anticipate holding our 2026 annual meeting of shareholders on May 4, 2026. As a result, notice of shareholder proposals to be brought at the 2026 annual meeting of shareholders must be delivered to our Secretary no earlier than January 4, 2026, and no later than February 3, 2026. The shareholder’s notice to the Secretary must include: (a) a brief description of the proposal desired to be brought before the meeting and the reasons for conducting such business at the meeting; (b) the name and address, as they appear on the Company’s books, of the shareholder proposing such business; (c) the number of shares of the Company’s common stock beneficially owned by such shareholder on the date of such shareholder’s notice; and (d) any financial or other interest of such shareholder in the proposal.

Board Leadership Structure

We currently have separate individuals serving as Chairman of our board of directors and as our Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Jeffrey C. Smith serves as Chairman, and Mr. Jeffrey G. Ludwig holds the position of Chief Executive Officer.

Although our bylaws do not require our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer positions to be separate, our board believes that having separate positions and having a non-executive director serve as Chairman is the appropriate leadership structure for the Company at this time and demonstrates our commitment to good corporate governance. Separating these positions allows our Chief Executive Officer to focus on our day-to-day business, while allowing the Chairman to lead the board in its fundamental role of providing advice to and independent oversight of management. In addition, we believe this leadership structure allows our board to more effectively monitor and evaluate the performance of our Chief Executive Officer.

Independent Director Sessions

Consistent with Nasdaq Stock Market listing requirements, the independent directors regularly meet without the non-independent directors present. In 2024, nine independent sessions were held.

Board’s Role in Risk Oversight

Risk is inherent with every business, and how well a business manages risk can ultimately determine its success. We face a number of risks, including general economic risks, credit risks, regulatory risks, audit risks, reputational risks and others, such as the impact of competition. Management is responsible for the day-to-day management of risks the Company faces, while the board, as a whole and through its committees, has responsibility for the oversight of risk management. In its risk oversight role, the board of directors has the responsibility that the risk management processes designed and implemented by management are adequate and functioning as designed.

While the full board of directors is charged with ultimate oversight responsibility for risk management, various committees of the board and members of management also have responsibilities with respect to our risk oversight. In particular, the Risk Policy & Compliance Committee plays a large role in monitoring and assessing our financial, legal, and organizational risks and receives regular reports from the management team regarding comprehensive organizational risk as well as particular areas of concern. The board’s Compensation Committee monitors and assesses the various risks associated with compensation policies

11

TABLE OF CONTENTS​​​​

and oversees incentives that encourage a level of risk-taking consistent with our overall strategy. The board’s Risk Policy & Compliance Committee monitors and assesses interest rate risk exposure in the coordinated management of both assets and liabilities. Additionally, our Chief Credit Officer and loan review staff are directly responsible for overseeing our credit risk, and the Director Credit Risk Committee of the Bank’s board of directors oversees the credit risk for large loans, monitors portfolio credit metrics and approves credit risk policy changes.

We believe that establishing the right “tone at the top” and providing for full and open communication between management and our board of directors are essential for effective risk management and oversight. Our executive management meets regularly with our other senior officers to discuss strategy and risks facing the Company, including through meetings of its Senior Risk Committee. Executive officers attend many of the board meetings or, if not in attendance, are available to address any questions or concerns raised by the board on risk-management-related and any other matters. Additionally, each of our board-level committees provides regular reports to the full board and apprises of any areas of concern.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

During 2024, Jennifer L. DiMotta, Deborah A. Golden, Richard T. Ramos and Jeffrey C. Smith served on our Compensation Committee. None of them has been an officer or employee of the Company. None of our executive officers serves or has served as a member of the board of directors, compensation committee or other board committee performing equivalent functions of any entity that has one or more executive officers serving as one of our directors or on our Compensation Committee.

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics

We have a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics in place that applies to all of our directors and employees. The code sets forth the standard of ethics that we expect all of our directors and employees to follow. Our code of business conduct and ethics is available on our website at www.midlandsb.com under “Investors — Corporate Governance — Governance Highlights.” In accordance with SEC rules, we intend to disclose on the “Investors” section of our website any amendments to the code, or any waivers of its requirements, that apply to our executive officers to the extent such disclosure is required.

Insider Trading Policy and Anti-Hedging Policy

We have adopted insider trading policies and procedures governing the purchase, sale or other dispositions of our securities by our directors, officers and employees that are reasonably designed to promote compliance with insider trading laws, rules and regulations, and the listing standards of the Nasdaq Stock Market.

In addition, our insider trading policy prohibits our directors, executive officers and employees from entering into any hedging transaction with respect to any of the Company’s securities. This prohibition includes the purchase or use of stock options, prepaid variable forward contracts, equity swaps, collars, exchange funds or any other instruments to directly offset any decrease in the market value of the Company’s securities. However, this prohibition does not apply to positions in broad-based exchange-traded mutual funds or exchange-traded funds containing stocks in the financial or banking sector.

Board Diversity

As of the date of this proxy statement, the board consists of ten individuals, including one woman, who identifies as White, and nine men, one of whom identifies as Hispanic or Latino and eight of whom identify as White.

12

TABLE OF CONTENTS​

Director Compensation

The following table sets forth information regarding 2024 compensation for each of our nonemployee directors. None of the directors receive any compensation or other payment in connection with his or her service as a director other than compensation received from the Company as set forth below.

Name

​

​

Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($)

​

​

Stock Awards(1) ($)

​

​

Total ($)

​

R. Dean Bingham

​

​

​

​

58,000

​

​

​

​

​

45,000

​

​

​

​

​

103,000

​

​

Gerald J. Carlson(2)

​

​

​

​

47,500

​

​

​

​

​

45,000

​

​

​

​

​

92,500

​

​

Jennifer L. DiMotta

​

​

​

​

47,000

​

​

​

​

​

45,000

​

​

​

​

​

92,000

​

​

Sherina M. Edwards(3)

​

​

​

​

45,500

​

​

​

​

​

45,000

​

​

​

​

​

90,500

​

​

Travis J. Franklin(4)​

​

​

​

​

34,000

​

​

​

​

​

45,000

​

​

​

​

​

79,000

​

​

Deborah A. Golden(5)​

​

​

​

​

25,000

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

25,000

​

​

Jerry L. McDaniel

​

​

​

​

53,500

​

​

​

​

​

45,000

​

​

​

​

​

98,500

​

​

Jeffrey M. McDonnell

​

​

​

​

43,500

​

​

​

​

​

45,000

​

​

​

​

​

88,500

​

​

Richard T. Ramos

​

​

​

​

58,500

​

​

​

​

​

45,000

​

​

​

​

​

103,500

​

​

Robert F. Schultz

​

​

​

​

65,500

​

​

​

​

​

45,000

​

​

​

​

​

110,500

​

​

Jeffrey C. Smith

​

​

​

​

107,750

​

​

​

​

​

45,000

​

​

​

​

​

152,750

​

​

​

(1)

The amounts set forth in the “Stock Awards” column reflect the aggregate grant date fair value of restricted stock units granted in 2024 in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. The assumptions used in calculating the option award amounts are set forth in Note 14 to our consolidated financial statements filed with the SEC on our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024. The amounts shown are based on a fair market value of $22.65 for awards granted on June 30, 2024. Each of our directors, aside from Mr. Ludwig, received a grant of restricted stock units on June 30, 2024. There were no outstanding unvested restricted stock units held by any nonemployee director as of December 31, 2024.

​

(2)

Mr. Carlson was appointed to the Company’s board of directors on February 6, 2024.

​

(3)

Ms. Edwards resigned from the Company’s board of directors effective May 12, 2025.

​

(4)

Mr. Franklin was appointed to the Company’s board of directors on May 7, 2024.

​

(5)

Ms. Golden retired from the Company’s board of directors on May 6, 2024.

​

Under our director compensation policy, nonemployee directors are provided with cash compensation and an annual equity award of restricted stock units under the 2019 LTIP. Certain of our nonemployee directors defer a portion, or all, of their director compensation under the Director Deferred Compensation Plan.

Cash Compensation.   Each nonemployee director receives a $40,000 annual retainer, except that the Chairman of the board is entitled to an annual retainer of $85,000. Company board committee chairs and members are also entitled to a fee for such service as follows (respectively):

•

Audit Committee: $15,000/$6,000

​

•

Risk Policy & Compliance Committee: $10,000/$5,000

​

•

Nominating and Governance Committee: $10,000/$5,000

​

•

Compensation Committee: $10,000/$6,000

​

In addition to the foregoing, any nonemployee director serving on the Director Credit Risk Committee is entitled to an additional annual fee of $18,000, and any such director serving on the trust committee of the Bank board is entitled to an additional annual fee of $3,000.

13

TABLE OF CONTENTS​

All cash compensation paid to nonemployee directors is earned and paid quarterly.

Equity Compensation.   Each nonemployee director is also entitled to an annual equity award of fully vested restricted stock units with a grant date value of $45,000. The equity award is granted on June 30 of each year.

CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITY

For more than 140 years, the Bank has strived to succeed by serving our customers and the communities in which they live. In furtherance of our goal of supporting a sustainable approach to business, we have installed solar power in 22 of our locations, and our corporate headquarters has been awarded LEED (Silver) Certification. More than 60% of our customers have embraced paperless statements, reducing waste and contributing to a sustainable future. Our Community Impact Investment goals and Community Development Plan are designed to ensure that we serve as a catalyst for strategic change. Midland’s Advanced Study for Talent Enrichment and Resource Training (MASTERS) program serves to develop future leaders within Midland, with 68% of participants being women or minority employees. We provide employees with paid time off to volunteer, contributing their time and talents to recognized charities, causes, or not-for-profit community organizations. Since 2011, the Midland States Bank Foundation has donated more than $1.8 million to nonprofit organizations in our footprint. In 2024, our employees dedicated over 500 volunteer hours to financial empowerment seminars in our communities, and since 2015, we have held more than 500 financial literacy seminars for low- to moderate-income and minority neighborhoods in our footprint.

The Company strives to maintain integrity through strong corporate governance practices. The Company’s Chair and CEO roles have been separate since 1988, and all directors, except our CEO, are “independent” under applicable SEC and Nasdaq standards. We have an executive compensation structure that rewards growth-oriented results while maintaining responsible risk management. Our clawback policy promotes accountability, and our long-standing commitment to governance means our board has included female, Hispanic, or African American representation since before we became a publicly traded company in 2016. In fact, Midland States Bank was one of the first banks in the nation to have a woman on our board back in 1903. Our approach to governance reinforces our commitment to risk management, with an Enterprise Risk Management program that follows the COSO 2017 framework to ensure we operate responsibly.

The information contained or referenced in this section of this proxy statement shall not be considered “filed” with the SEC, and such information shall not be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates this section of this proxy statement by reference in such filing.

14

TABLE OF CONTENTS​

PROPOSAL 1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

At the annual meeting, our shareholders will elect three Class III directors for a term expiring at the 2028 annual meeting of shareholders. The Company’s directors are divided into three classes having staggered terms of three years. As described further below, each of the three nominees is an incumbent director. Each nominee has consented to being a nominee and serving on the board, if elected, but if any of the nominees becomes unavailable for election, the holders of the proxies may vote for another nominee when voting at the meeting. Shareholders of the Company have no cumulative voting rights with respect to the election of directors.

Set forth below is information concerning the nominees for election and for the other directors whose terms of office will continue after the meeting.

The board of directors unanimously recommends that you vote “FOR” each of the nominees for director.

Nominees for Election

​

​

​

Name

​

​

Age

​

​

Position with the Company

​

​

Director Since

​

Class III Term expires 2028

​

​

R. Dean Bingham

​

​

61

​

​

Director

​

​

2020

​

​

Jerry L. McDaniel

​

​

60

​

​

Director

​

​

2012

​

​

Jeffrey M. McDonnell

​

​

62

​

​

Director

​

​

2015

​

Continuing Directors

​

​

​

Name

​

​

Age

​

​

Position with the Company

​

​

Director Since

​

Class I Term expires 2026

​

​

Jennifer L. DiMotta

​

​

51

​

​

Director

​

​

2018

​

​

Jeffrey G. Ludwig

​

​

54

​

​

President, Chief Executive Officer and Director

​

​

2019

​

​

Richard T. Ramos

​

​

62

​

​

Director

​

​

2012

​

​

Jeffrey C. Smith

​

​

64

​

​

Chairman of the Board

​

​

2005

​

Class II Term expires 2027

​

​

Gerald J. Carlson

​

​

66

​

​

Director

​

​

2024

​

​

Travis J. Franklin

​

​

48

​

​

Director

​

​

2024

​

​

Robert F. Schultz

​

​

61

​

​

Director

​

​

2002

​

Each of our continuing directors listed above and, if elected, each of the nominees listed above, will hold office until the annual meeting of shareholders in the year indicated, or until their earlier resignation or removal. There are no arrangements or understandings with any of the nominees pursuant to which they have been selected as nominees or directors.

The business experience of each nominee and continuing director, as well as their qualifications to serve on the board, is set forth below. Unless otherwise noted, nominees for director have been employed in their principal occupation with the same organization for at least the last five years. Other than as described below, no nominee, continuing director or executive officer has any family relationship, as defined in Item 401 of Regulation S-K, with any other director or with any of our executive officers.

15

TABLE OF CONTENTS

​ Jeffrey C. Smith ​ ​ Background.   Mr. Smith serves as the Chairman of the Company, a position he has held since 2020. He is a Principal and Managing Partner of Walters Golf Management, a golf club management company headquartered in St. Louis, Missouri, which manages a number of properties and offers turnkey management, construction management, acquisition, consulting, agronomics and remodeling/redecorating services. The company also has a revenue management business assisting facilities to improve annual green fee income through innovative software systems and methodologies. He has been with Walters Golf Management Group since 1996 and also serves on two not-for-profit philanthropic boards, The Greater St. Louis Golf Charities, and the Metropolitan Golf Foundation. Mr. Smith received his B.S. in Education from the University of Missouri. Skills and Qualifications.   Our board considered Mr. Smith’s business experience, his management experience as the managing partner of a business and his knowledge of the business community in our St. Louis market area in determining that he should be a member of our board. ​

​ Jeffrey G. Ludwig ​ ​ Background.   Mr. Ludwig serves as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, positions he has held since March 2018 and January 2019, respectively, and as Chief Executive Officer of the Bank since March 2018. Prior to those appointments, Mr. Ludwig served as Executive Vice President of the Company and the Bank since 2010, and also as Chief Financial Officer of the Company and the Bank from November 2006, when he joined the Company and the Bank, through November 2016 and from October 2017 until March 2018. Mr. Ludwig also previously served as President of the Bank from November 2016 until he was promoted to Chief Executive Officer of the Bank in March 2018. He serves on the Company’s Executive Committee. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Ludwig held the positions of Associate Director, Corporate Reporting, for Zimmer Holdings, Inc., an NYSE-listed company in Warsaw, Indiana, from 2005 to 2006; Director of Corporate Accounting for Novellus Systems, Inc., a Nasdaq-listed company in San Jose, California, from 2002 to 2005; and various positions, including Senior Manager — Audit & Advisory Services, for KPMG LLP in its banking practice in St. Louis, Missouri, from 1993 to 2000 and in its technology practice in Mountain View, California, from 2000 to 2002. In addition to his positions at the Company, Mr. Ludwig serves as a member of the Federal Advisory Council of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. Mr. Ludwig received his B.S. in Accounting from Eastern Illinois University. Skills and Qualifications.   Our board considered Mr. Ludwig’s positions as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, his experience in executive officer roles within the Bank, and his long-standing relationships within the business community in determining that he should be a member of our board. ​

16

TABLE OF CONTENTS

​ R. Dean Bingham ​ ​ Background.   Mr. Bingham has served on the board of directors of the Bank since 2018 and joined the board of directors of the Company in 2020. Since 1994, Mr. Bingham has served as President, and then Chief Executive Officer of Agracel, Inc., an industrial developer of facilities for manufacturing and high-tech entities in small to midsized communities. Throughout his career, Mr. Bingham has been directly involved with the development of over 25 million square feet of industrial projects on long term leases, focused primarily in tertiary markets with an emphasis on manufacturing. Mr. Bingham received his B.S. in Industrial Engineering from the University of Illinois. Skills and Qualifications.   Our board considered Mr. Bingham’s business experience, his management experience as the President of a business and his knowledge of the business community in determining that he should be a member of our board. ​

​ Gerald J. Carlson ​ ​ Background.   Mr. Carlson joined the Company’s board of directors in February 2024 and serves as Chair of our Audit Committee. He previously served as Managing Partner of KPMG for the firm’s Washington, D.C. metropolitan and Chesapeake regions, a position he held from 2013 until his retirement in 2019. Prior to that, Mr. Carlson served as Managing Partner of KPMG’s St. Louis office, which position he held since 2008. Throughout his career, Mr. Carlson served as an audit partner and advisor to private and publicly held clients, including a number of Fortune 500 companies. As a Managing Partner of KPMG, Mr. Carlson was responsible for leading a culture of ethics and integrity, developing marketplace strategies for growth, overseeing high-quality client service, attracting and retaining key resources and representing KPMG in the marketplace. Mr. Carlson has served on the boards of many organizations, including currently serving on the boards of two private equity backed companies, the Great Rivers Greenway Foundation, Connected DMV, and the Dean’s Advisory Board of the Robert S. Trulaske School of Business at the University of Missouri — Columbia. He previously served on the boards of the Greater Washington Board of Trade, the Regional Business Council, and Catholic Charities of the Archdiocese of St. Louis, among others. Mr. Carlson holds a B.A. in Accounting and a Master’s Degree in Accounting from University of Missouri — Columbia. Skills and Qualifications.   Our board considered Mr. Carlson’s business and leadership experience as a managing partner of a professional services and audit firm, his experience with both public and private sectors, his knowledge of corporate governance and his accounting experience in determining that he should be a member of our board. ​

17

TABLE OF CONTENTS

​ Jennifer L. DiMotta ​ ​ Background.   Mrs. DiMotta serves as the Chief Digital Officer at Rush Recommerce, LLC. In addition, she is President of DiMotta International LLC (DI), an international consulting firm focusing on digital transformation, leadership training and building aggressive sales growth, a position she has held since 2020. Prior to DI, she served as Executive Vice President and Chief Marketing Digital Officer of MediaMarktSaturn, Europe’s largest consumer electronics retailer, from 2019 to 2020. Prior to joining MediaMarkt in 2019, she was President of DiMotta Consulting LLC, a strategic eCommerce and digital marketing consulting firm, which she founded in 2017. Prior to launching her consulting business, Mrs. DiMotta served as Vice President Digital and Omnichannel of Bluemercury Inc., a cosmetics retailer, beginning in 2015, as Vice President eCommerce of Sports Authority, Inc., a sporting goods retailer, beginning in 2013, and as Senior Director of eCommerce of Office Depot, beginning in 2012, where she was responsible for developing those companies’ eCommerce and digital marketing efforts. Mrs. DiMotta holds a B.A. in Criminal Justice from the University of Nebraska, and a Master’s Degree in Leadership from Bellevue University. Skills and Qualifications.   Our board considered Mrs. DiMotta’s more than 20 years’ experience in leadership and management, business development, and information technology, including omnichannel strategies, in determining that she should be a member of our board. ​

​ Travis J. Franklin ​ ​ Background.   Mr. Franklin is the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Heartland Dental, LLC, a leading dental support organization that provides operational support to dental practices nationwide, a position he has held since 2016. Prior to joining Heartland Dental he served as Chief Investment Officer for a family office. Mr. Franklin holds a B.S. in Business Management and an M.B.A. from Eastern Illinois University. Skills and Qualifications.   Our board considered Mr. Franklin’s business and leadership experience as a chief financial officer of a large private company and his accounting experience in determining that he should be a member of our board. ​

​ Jerry L. McDaniel ​ ​ Background.   Mr. McDaniel, who serves as Chair of our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, is President of Superior Fuels, Inc., whose principal business was the wholesale supply of propane and petroleum products prior to the sale of these business lines and which now holds various real estate investments, a position he has held since 2007, and President of Dirtbuster Carwash LLC, which operates carwashes in Southern Illinois and Indiana. In addition to his ownership of these businesses, Mr. McDaniel is a principal in other businesses, including real estate development. Mr. McDaniel is a licensed pilot and previously served on the board of the Southeastern Illinois Community Foundation from 2013 to 2020. Prior to joining our board, Mr. McDaniel served as a director of another local community bank. Skills and Qualifications.   Our board considered Mr. McDaniel’s experience in starting and running several local businesses, his broad investment experience and his prior service as a director of a community bank in determining that he should be a member of our board. ​

18

TABLE OF CONTENTS

​ Jeffrey M. McDonnell ​ ​ Background.   Mr. McDonnell is Chief Executive Officer of J&J Management Services, Inc., a private management company, a position he has held since 2012, and prior to that as President and Chief Compliance Officer since 1997. He also serves on the board of The Center for Emerging Technologies, a non-profit technology incubator. Prior to Midland’s acquisition of Heartland Bank in December 2014, Mr. McDonnell was a director of Heartland Bank and its parent company, Love Savings Holding Company. Mr. McDonnell holds a B.A. in Economics from Princeton University, an M.B.A. from the University of Michigan and a certification as a Chartered Financial Analyst. Skills and Qualifications.   Our board considered Mr. McDonnell’s service on the boards of Love Savings Holding Company and Heartland Bank and his other business experience in determining that he should be a member of our board. ​

​ Richard T. Ramos ​ ​ Background.   Mr. Ramos, who serves as Chair of our Compensation Committee, is Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer of Maritz Development, operating unit of Maritz Holdings, Inc., headquartered in St. Louis, Missouri. Prior to this position, Mr. Ramos was the Executive Vice President of Maritz Holdings, Inc. Maritz specializes in the design and development of incentive, reward and loyalty programs focused on improving workforce quality and customer satisfaction. He has been with Maritz since 2000. Prior to joining Maritz, Mr. Ramos served as Chief Financial Officer for Purcell Tire and Rubber Company, practiced corporate law at the firm of Blumenfeld, Kaplan and Sandweiss in St. Louis, and was a senior manager at KPMG LLP. He received his B.S. in Business Administration from the University of Missouri in St. Louis and his J.D. from St. Louis University School of Law. Mr. Ramos is a Certified Public Accountant (inactive) and a member of the Missouri Bar. Skills and Qualifications.   Our board considered Mr. Ramos’s experience as a chief financial officer and board member and his accounting acumen in determining that he should be a member of our board. ​

​ Robert F. Schultz ​ ​ Background.   Mr. Schultz serves as Managing Partner of the J.M. Schultz Investment, L.L.C., a private family office. He has been with this organization since 1989. Since 1996, he also has served as Chairman of the Board of Directors of AKRA Builders Inc., a multi-state construction, design-build and project management firm headquartered in Teutopolis, Illinois. Prior to joining the Company’s board of directors, he served on the board of directors of Prime Banc Corp. and First National Bank of Dieterich. He also serves as a founding board member of national, state and regional non-profit organizations focused on social services and student education. Mr. Schultz received his B.S. in Finance from the University of Illinois and a J.D. from the University of Notre Dame Law School. Skills and Qualifications.   Our board considered Mr. Schultz’s business and investment experience, his experience as a director of other community banks, and his knowledge of the business community in our central Illinois market area in determining that he should be a member of our board. ​

The business experience for each of our executive officers not discussed above is as follows:

Jeffrey S. Mefford.   Mr. Mefford, age 60, serves as Executive Vice President of the Company and President of the Bank, positions he has held since March 2018. He has been with the Bank since 2003, and prior to his appointment as Executive Vice President of the Company and President of the Bank, he served as the Bank’s Executive Vice President — Banking since October 2010. Prior to serving as Executive Vice President — Banking, Mr. Mefford served as the Bank’s Illinois Region Market President, responsible for

19

TABLE OF CONTENTS

the banking offices in our central Illinois market. Prior to joining the Bank, Mr. Mefford held the position of President and Chief Executive Officer of Farmers State Bank of Camp Point in Camp Point, Illinois, from 2000 to 2003. Mr. Mefford received his B.S. in Business Administration from Illinois College and his M.B.A. from William Woods University.

Eric T. Lemke.   Mr. Lemke, age 56, CPA (inactive), serves as Chief Financial Officer of the Company and the Bank, having been promoted to those positions in November 2019. Prior to his appointment as Chief Financial Officer, Mr. Lemke, who has been with the Company since 2018, served as Director of Assurance and Audit. Immediately prior to joining the Company, he was the Chief Financial Officer of Metropolitan Capital Bancorp, Inc. and Metropolitan Capital Bank & Trust, its banking subsidiary, since July 2017. Prior to that he was a partner in the Financial Services Practice of RSM US LLP, having first joined RSM in 1993. Mr. Lemke holds a B.S. in Accounting from Olivet Nazarene University in Bourbonnais, Illinois, and is a member of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.

Daniel E. Casey.   Mr. Casey, age 53, serves as the Bank’s Senior Vice President and Chief Risk Officer, a position he has held since May 2023. Prior to joining the Bank, Mr. Casey was the Managing Director, Global Head of Credit Portfolio Management (Integrated Supply and Trading) at BP plc from 2009 to 2023. He also held positions at ABN AMRO Bank N.V./ LaSalle Bank, N.A., as Managing Director, Portfolio Strategist and Global Head of Markets (Group Treasury) from 2004 to 2009, and Bank One, N.A. as Director, Credit Portfolio Group from 2002 to 2004. Mr. Casey received his B.S. in Finance from Eastern Illinois University and his M.B.A. from St. Xavier University, Graham School of Management.

20

TABLE OF CONTENTS​​​​

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

This Compensation Discussion and Analysis (“CD&A”) explains our executive compensation program for our named executive officers (“NEOs”) listed below. This CD&A also describes the Compensation Committee’s process for making pay decisions, as well as its rationale for specific decisions related to the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024.

Name	​	​	Position	​
Jeffrey G. Ludwig	​	​	President and Chief Executive Officer	​
Jeffrey S. Mefford	​	​	Executive Vice President and President of the Bank	​
Eric T. Lemke	​	​	Chief Financial Officer	​
Douglas J. Tucker(1)	​	​	Senior Vice President and Corporate Counsel	​
Daniel E. Casey	​	​	Chief Risk Officer of the Bank	​

​

(1)

On January 3, 2025, Douglas J. Tucker retired from his position as Senior Vice President and Corporate Counsel of the Company.

​

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

2024 Compensation Highlights

We compensate our NEOs with a combination of base salary, annual cash incentive bonuses, long-term equity incentive awards, and other benefits, including perquisites. Our executive compensation program is designed to attract, retain and motivate qualified and talented executives to achieve our short- and long-term business goals and create shareholder value.

Based on our performance and consistent with the design of our program, the Compensation Committee made the following executive compensation decisions for fiscal year 2024:

•

Base Salaries.   The Compensation Committee approved base salary increases for 2024 ranging between 2.2% and 13.3%. See “2024 Executive Compensation Program in Detail” within this CD&A section for more information.

​

•

Annual Cash Incentive Bonuses.   Based on the circumstances that drove our 2024 performance results, the Compensation Committee approved award payouts at 27% of target under the Company’s Corporate Bonus Plan. See “2024 Executive Compensation Program in Detail” within this CD&A section for more information.

​

•

Long-Term Equity Incentive Awards.   The Compensation Committee granted equity awards using 100% restricted stock, which are subject to four-year vesting schedules.

​

Compensation Best Practices

Our Compensation Committee considers it important to design our compensation program in accordance with best practices for public companies, while continuing to be able to recruit and retain superior executive talent.

​	What We Do	​	​	What We Do Not Do	​
​	• Use performance-based incentives as a significant portion of our NEOs’ total compensation ​ • Use peer group benchmarking to inform compensation decisions ​ • Condition short-term incentive-based compensation on key performance metrics (adjusted earnings per share, adjusted pre-tax pre-provision income and adjusted revenue) ​	​	​	• Provide tax gross-ups, except for those available to all employees generally ​ • Include walk-away severance payments or single-trigger cash payments upon a change in control ​ • Provide single-trigger vesting of equity awards in change of control transactions for awards granted during 2020 and thereafter under our 2019 Long-Term Incentive Plan ​	​

21

TABLE OF CONTENTS​​​

​	What We Do	​	​	What We Do Not Do	​
​	• Condition annual long-term incentives on four-year equal tranche vesting ​ • Have a clawback policy for incentive compensation that is compliant with SEC and NASDAQ rules ​ • Have stock ownership guidelines for executives and directors ​ • Provide for severance payments only upon an involuntary termination of employment where the termination was without cause or for “good reason” ​(whether or not such termination is in connection with a change in control) ​ • Conduct an annual risk-based assessment of our compensation program ​	​	​	• Re-price equity awards without prior shareholder approval ​ • Allow hedging of Company stock ​ • No liberal change in control definition in individual contracts or equity plans and no unspecified treatment of equity awards in the event of a change in control ​ • Offer any executive pension plans ​ • Have employment agreements that provide for guaranteed salary increases, cash incentive bonuses, or equity incentive compensation ​	​

Prior Year’s Say-on-Pay Vote

At the Company’s 2024 annual meeting of shareholders, the nonbinding, advisory proposal to approve the compensation of certain executive officers received the approval of approximately 97% of the shares having voting power and present at the meeting. The Company, the board of directors and the Compensation Committee pay careful attention to communications received from shareholders regarding executive compensation, including the nonbinding, advisory vote and believe that the vote reflects our shareholders’ support of our compensation philosophy and the manner in which we compensate our NEOs. The Compensation Committee generally considered the strong support for the advisory vote on executive compensation as part of its evaluation of the 2024 compensation program.

We will continue to review, evaluate and modify the structure and design of our program to meet its objectives, promote strategic growth, increase value for our shareholders, and maintain a competitive executive compensation package in relation to our peers.

WHAT GUIDES OUR PROGRAM

Compensation Philosophy and Objectives

We strive to be among the top performing community banks in the nation. While our operations are primarily located in Illinois and the St. Louis metropolitan area in Missouri, we measure our performance on both a local and national level. Our compensation philosophy reflects this vision and strategy.

We structure our executive compensation program to align our NEOs’ compensation with both our short-term and long-term business objectives and the creation of shareholder value. By doing so, our executive compensation program enables us to attract, retain, and motivate executive officers who contribute to our financial performance and success. In particular, we do the following:

•

use short-term performance-based incentives, which are conditioned on the achievement of certain adjusted earnings per share, adjusted pre-tax pre-provision income and adjusted revenue targets and focus our executive team on sustaining top-level performance of the Company, as a meaningful portion of our NEOs’ total compensation;

​

•

provide long-term equity incentive awards that focus our executive team on creating long-term value for our shareholders and incentivize long-term executive retention;

​

•

ensure a sufficient base level of annual salary in both strong and weak economic markets to attract and retain national-level executive talent; and

​

•

conduct, through our Risk Management Department, an annual risk-based assessment of our compensation program to help ensure our overall compensation program is designed to incentivize long-term shareholder growth without incentivizing short-term risk taking.

​

22

TABLE OF CONTENTS​​

In evaluating our compensation packages, the Compensation Committee is mindful of the need to compete for national-level executive talent and attract talent to Effingham, Illinois, the location of our corporate headquarters. In this endeavor, one of our challenges has been persuading top-level talent to relocate to, often from major metropolitan areas, and remain in Effingham, which is a town of slightly more than 12,000 people situated approximately two hours from St. Louis, Missouri and Indianapolis, Indiana. As a result, our executive compensation program offers compensation packages that are competitive with those offered by our peers, regardless of locality.

While the Compensation Committee considers the pay practices of our peers as one of many factors in establishing our executive compensation programs, it does not set compensation at a specific percentile of our peers. As discussed in more detail below, the Compensation Committee has established a selective group of peers with the assistance of our independent compensation consultant.

Elements of Compensation

Our compensation philosophy is supported by the following principal elements of compensation:

Pay Element	​	​	How It’s Paid	​	​	Purpose	​
Base Salary	​	​	Cash (Fixed)	​	​	Provide competitive and consistent compensation relative to similar positions in the market and enable the Company to attract and retain critical executive talent.	​
Annual Incentives	​	​	Cash (Variable)	​	​	Reward executive officers for delivering on annual strategic objectives.	​
Long-Term Incentives	​	​	Equity (Variable)	​	​	Provide incentives for our NEOs to create shareholder value and retain our NEOs through long-term vesting.	​

Pay Mix

The charts below show the target annual total direct compensation of our CEO and our other NEOs for fiscal 2024. These charts illustrate that a meaningful portion of executive compensation is variable (58% for our CEO and an average of 50% for our other NEOs).

23

TABLE OF CONTENTS​

The Decision-Making Process

The Role of the Compensation Committee.   The Compensation Committee oversees the executive compensation program for our NEOs. The Compensation Committee is comprised of independent, non-employee members of the Board. The Compensation Committee works very closely with its independent consultant and management to examine the effectiveness of the Company’s executive compensation program throughout the year. Details of the Compensation Committee’s authority and responsibilities are specified in its charter, which may be accessed at www.midlandsb.com under “Investors — Corporate Governance — Governance Highlights.”

Role of Executive Officers.   None of our NEOs participates in or makes recommendations with respect to the determination of their own compensation. The Compensation Committee is responsible for all compensation decisions affecting our Chief Executive Officer. Additionally, the Compensation Committee sets the terms of the performance-based annual cash incentive bonuses and long-term equity incentive awards for all our NEOs and determines the actual payouts of such bonuses and awards. Our Chief Executive Officer recommends salary adjustments for the other NEOs, which the Compensation Committee reviews prior to adjustments becoming effective.

Use of Independent Consultants.   The Compensation Committee has authority to retain, at the Company’s expense, outside counsel, experts, compensation consultants and other advisors, as needed. For 2024, the Compensation Committee retained Pearl Meyer & Partners, LLC as an independent compensation consultant to advise it on compensation matters. In 2024, Pearl Meyer’s specific services to the Compensation Committee included reviewing and updating, as appropriate, our compensation philosophy; reviewing potential risks associated with our compensation programs; analyzing our NEO and director compensation levels, including based on our peer group; and analyzing our equity utilization. Pearl Meyer also provided reports to the Compensation Committee on market compensation trends and developments.

In its engagement of Pearl Meyer, the Compensation Committee considered the independence of its compensation advisor under applicable SEC and Nasdaq listing rules and concluded there was no conflict of interest with respect to their engagement.

The Role of Peer Group Companies.   The Compensation Committee strives to set a competitive level of total compensation for each NEO as compared with executive officers in similar positions at peer companies.

Our peer group established in 2023 was the result of a comprehensive and in-depth assessment by the Compensation Committee, conducted with the support of Pearl Meyer. This evaluation carefully examined the appropriateness of the companies included, ensuring they accurately reflected the Bank’s size, scope, and market position. The assessment also incorporated a review of the broader marketplace to identify any necessary additions or removals, resulting in significant and appropriate changes to the peer group for 2023. We reviewed our peer group again in 2024 and retained our 2023 peer group for 2024 compensation decisions.

Our peer group companies for 2024 were as follows:

​	City Holding Company	​	​	First Merchants Corporation	​	​	Park National Corporation	​
​	Community Trust Bancorp, Inc.	​	​	German American Bancorp, Inc.	​	​	Peoples Bancorp Inc.	​
​	Enterprise Financial Services Corp	​	​	Horizon Bancorp, Inc.	​	​	QCR Holdings, Inc.	​
​	FB Financial Corporation	​	​	Independent Bank Corporation (MI)	​	​	S&T Bancorp, Inc.	​
​	First Bancorp	​	​	Lakeland Financial Corporation	​	​	Sandy Spring Bancorp, Inc.	​
​	First Busey Corporation	​	​	Northwest Bancshares, Inc.	​	​	Tompkins Financial Corporation	​
​	First Commonwealth Financial Corp	​	​	Origin Bancorp, Inc.	​

It is important to note that this peer group and other market data provided by Pearl Meyer is not the sole determinant in setting pay levels for our NEOs. The Compensation Committee also considers Company and individual performance and the nature of an individual’s role within the Company, as well as his or her experience and contributions to his or her current role when making its compensation-related decisions.

24

TABLE OF CONTENTS​​​

2024 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PROGRAM IN DETAIL

Base Salary

Base salary represents annual fixed compensation and is a standard element of compensation necessary to attract and retain executive leadership talent. The Compensation Committee reviews and approves the base salaries of our NEOs and sets the compensation of our Chief Executive Officer. In setting the base salary of each NEO, the Compensation Committee relies on market data provided annually by our independent compensation consultant and survey data from industry resources. Salary levels are typically considered annually as part of our executive compensation review process and upon a promotion or other change in job responsibility.

After the Compensation Committee’s annual NEO base salary review, it approved the following base salary increases for 2024, reflecting individual performance, market benchmarking, and the Company’s overall performance. While the base salary increases for most NEOs averaged approximately 3%, Messrs. Mefford and Lemke received more significant increases to improve their competitive pay positioning relative to the market. The table below states the base salaries for our NEOs in 2023 and 2024.

Name

​

​

2023 Base Salary

​

​

2024 Base Salary

​

​

Increase

​

Jeffrey G. Ludwig

​

​

​

$

721,000

​

​

​

​

$

749,800

​

​

​

​

​

4.0%

​

​

Jeffrey S. Mefford

​

​

​

​

463,500

​

​

​

​

​

525,000

​

​

​

​

​

13.3%

​

​

Douglas J. Tucker

​

​

​

​

391,400

​

​

​

​

​

400,000

​

​

​

​

​

2.2%

​

​

Eric T. Lemke

​

​

​

​

405,020

​

​

​

​

​

437,400

​

​

​

​

​

8.0%

​

​

Daniel E. Casey

​

​

​

​

325,000

​

​

​

​

​

334,800

​

​

​

​

​

3.0%

​

​

Annual Cash Incentive Bonus — Corporate Bonus Plan

The Compensation Committee believes that performance-based compensation can and should incentivize our NEOs to drive the Company’s growth, balanced with the assumption of reasonable risk. Accordingly, we account for several performance- and risk-based metrics in their annual cash incentive bonuses.

Annual cash incentive bonuses may be earned in accordance with the terms of the Company’s Corporate Bonus Plan (the “Bonus Plan”). Actual payouts depend on the achievement of pre-determined financial performance objectives and can range from 0% to a cap of 150% of target award amounts. Target annual award opportunities are expressed as a percentage of base salary and were established based on the NEO’s level of responsibility and their ability to impact the Company’s overall financial results. To emphasize corporate performance, 100% of the bonus opportunities available to our NEOs are conditioned on Company performance.

On a year-by-year basis, the Compensation Committee structures the Bonus Plan by selecting and weighting annual financial goals under which bonuses may be earned. In accordance with the weighting assigned by the Compensation Committee, our NEOs are eligible to earn a portion of their target cash incentive bonuses if the Company attains a sufficient level of performance for a particular metric. If we fail to attain more than 90% of the target performance goal for any performance metric, our NEOs earn no amount of their target bonuses subject to such metric. If we achieve greater than 90% but less than 100% of the target performance goal for any performance metric, our NEOs earn between 50% and 100% of the amount of their target bonuses subject to such metric, with actual payouts determined based on a sliding scale. If we achieve above 100% of a performance goal, the NEOs will earn an increased percentage of the amount of their target bonuses. In addition, annual bonuses are subject to partial reduction or forfeiture if certain risk-based capital and asset quality metrics are not maintained, including specified levels for the Bank’s Tier 1 leverage ratio and the Company’s ratio of nonperforming assets to total assets. The NEOs may later earn restoration bonuses following a reduction or forfeiture if the Compensation Committee determines that the deficiencies in the risk-based metrics have been timely cured.

25

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Annual cash incentive bonuses are based on the level of achievement of financial metrics selected by the Compensation Committee for the respective year. The annual cash incentive bonuses for our NEOs in 2024 were based upon the following Company performance metrics:

•

Adjusted Earnings Per Share — 35% of the annual cash incentive bonus was based upon achieving a specified earnings per share goal for the year, as adjusted for certain items, including loss on sales of investment securities, net, and gain on repurchase of subordinated debt (“Adjusted EPS”).

​

•

Adjusted Pre-Tax, Pre-Provision Income — 35% of the annual cash incentive bonus was based upon achieving a specified pre-tax, pre-provision income goal for the year, as adjusted for certain items, including loss on sales of investment securities, net, and gain on repurchase of subordinated debt (“Adjusted PTPP Income”).

​

•

Adjusted Revenue — 30% of the annual cash incentive bonus was based upon achieving a specified revenue goal for the year, as adjusted for certain items, including loss on sales of investment securities, net, and gain on repurchase of subordinated debt (“Adjusted Revenue”).

​

The table below summarizes the components and results of the Bonus Plan for our NEOs for the 2024 fiscal year.

2024 Metric (dollars in thousands, except per share data)

​

​

Metric Weight

​

​

Threshold Goal

​

​

Target Goal

​

​

Actual Result(1)

​

​

Percent Attained

​

​

Payout Percentage

​

Adjusted EPS

​

​

​

​

35%

​

​

​

​

$

2.84

​

​

​

​

$

3.15

​

​

​

​

$

(1.05)

​

​

​

​

​

0.0%

​

​

​

​

​

0%

​

​

Adjusted PTPP Income

​

​

​

​

35%

​

​

​

​

$

111,761

​

​

​

​

$

124,179

​

​

​

​

$

106,306

​

​

​

​

​

85.61%

​

​

​

​

​

0%

​

​

Adjusted Revenue

​

​

​

​

30%

​

​

​

​

$

275,815

​

​

​

​

$

306,461

​

​

​

​

$

299,568

​

​

​

​

​

97.75%

​

​

​

​

​

90%

​

​

Total Payout

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

27%

​

​

​

(1)

The amounts reported in the Actual Result column were the amounts considered by the Compensation Committee in determining annual cash incentive bonuses in early 2025 (which was prior to the identification of errors in the Company’s unaudited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2024), but these amounts do not reflect the subsequent correction of such errors, as reflected in the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2024, included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on July 1, 2025. As required by the Company’s Clawback Policy, the Audit Committee will conduct a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by the Company’s executive officers during the relevant recovery period, including the cash incentive bonuses in respect of the year ended December 31, 2024, based on the corrected actual results.

​

The Compensation Committee oversees performance throughout the fiscal year, evaluating progress against set objectives, and has the discretion to consider adjustments for exceptional items that may distort the assessment of normal operating performance, such as costs related to restructuring, acquisitions, legal matters, and pandemic-related impacts. These adjustments aim to maintain fairness to both participants and shareholders, while also fostering actions that promote the long-term health of the business and align with predetermined performance goals.

In light of challenging credit issues, the Company undertook strategic restructuring efforts in 2024. This included the one-time sales of certain non-core consumer loan portfolios as well as certain downgrades, charge-offs, and reserves in the Specialty Finance and Midland Equipment Finance portfolios. While these actions temporarily impacted earnings per share, PTPP income, and revenue, they are anticipated to reduce credit risk over the long term.

Based upon Company performance and the resulting metrics, the Compensation Committee approved bonus payouts at 27% of the target for the fiscal year. The table below summarizes the annual cash incentive bonus targets and actual payouts for each NEO for the 2024 fiscal year.

26

TABLE OF CONTENTS​​

Name

​

​

2024 Target (% of Salary)

​

​

Actual Bonus (% of Salary)

​

​

Actual Bonus ($)

​

Jeffrey G. Ludwig

​

​

​

​

65%

​

​

​

​

​

17.55%

​

​

​

​

​

130,233

​

​

Jeffrey S. Mefford

​

​

​

​

60%

​

​

​

​

​

16.2%

​

​

​

​

​

82,223

​

​

Douglas J. Tucker

​

​

​

​

40%

​

​

​

​

​

10.8%

​

​

​

​

​

42,950

​

​

Eric T. Lemke

​

​

​

​

40%

​

​

​

​

​

10.8%

​

​

​

​

​

46,299

​

​

Daniel E. Casey

​

​

​

​

40%

​

​

​

​

​

8.1%

​

​

​

​

​

35,870

​

​

Long-Term Equity Incentive Awards

The Compensation Committee believes that equity awards serve to align each officer’s interests with those of our shareholders. The equity awards held by our NEOs and reflected in the compensation tables below all relate to awards made under our 2019 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “2019 LTIP”) or its predecessor plans.

The Compensation Committee typically grants equity awards to each NEO at the time the individual is hired and, thereafter, on an annual basis as part of our overall executive compensation program. The Compensation Committee grants equity awards to encourage our NEOs to stay with, and maximize the performance of, the Company over the long term and to discourage excessive focus on short-term metrics at the expense of the long-term health of the organization.

For 2024, the Compensation Committee granted equity awards using 100% restricted stock as follows:

Name

​

​

Shares of Restricted Stock

​

​

Per Share Fair Value

​

​

Actual Grant Date Fair Value

​

Jeffrey G. Ludwig

​

​

​

​

20,110

​

​

​

​

$

27.96

​

​

​

​

$

562,276

​

​

Jeffrey S. Mefford

​

​

​

​

12,200

​

​

​

​

$

27.96

​

​

​

​

$

341,112

​

​

Douglas J. Tucker

​

​

​

​

7,150

​

​

​

​

$

27.96

​

​

​

​

$

199,914

​

​

Eric T. Lemke

​

​

​

​

7,820

​

​

​

​

$

27.96

​

​

​

​

$

218,647

​

​

Daniel E. Casey

​

​

​

​

5,390

​

​

​

​

$

27.96

​

​

​

​

$

150,704

​

​

Each grant of restricted stock awards vests annually in equal portions on the first four anniversaries of the grant date, assuming the executive’s employment has not previously terminated. Each grant also vests in full upon an involuntary termination in connection with a change in control of the Company or the NEO’s termination of employment due to death or disability. The grant date fair value of the restricted stock awards in 2024 was determined based on a share price of $27.96, the closing share price of the Company’s common stock as of the trading day immediately prior to the date of grant.

OTHER PRACTICES, POLICIES & GUIDELINES

Stock Ownership Guidelines

The Board believes that executive officers and directors of the Company should own and hold MSBI common stock (“MSBI Stock”) to further align their interests with the long-term interests of Company shareholders and further promote the Company’s commitment to sound corporate governance. Effective January 1, 2024, the guidelines are as follows:

Title	​	​	Guideline	​
CEO	​	​	3x base salary	​
Other Section 16 Officers	​	​	2x base salary	​
Directors	​	​	5x cash retainer	​

Shares owned outright by the executive officer/director or his or her immediate family members residing in the same household; shares held in trust for the benefit of the executive officer/director or his or

27

TABLE OF CONTENTS​​​​

her immediate family members residing in the same household; vested and unvested restricted stock awards; and vested deferred stock units, restricted stock units or performance share units that may only be settled in shares all count toward meeting the guidelines.

Executives and directors are expected to reach the required ownership level within five years of their appointment or election to their respective roles. Unless an executive or director has satisfied his or her applicable guideline level, until the guideline level is satisfied, they are required to retain an amount equal to 25% of the shares of MSBI Stock (or net shares where applicable) received as the result of the exercise, vesting or payment of any MSBI equity awards. The Company will regularly review and report on compliance with these Guidelines, and adjustments to the Guideline levels may be made as necessary to reflect changes in executive/director compensation or Company performance. As of December 31, 2024, each of the NEOs was in compliance with the guidelines.

Clawback Policy

On November 6, 2023, our Board adopted a clawback policy in accordance with Securities and Exchange Commission rules and the listing standards of the Nasdaq Stock Market LLC (Nasdaq), a copy of which is filed as an exhibit to our Annual Report on Form 10-K. The policy requires that we recoup certain cash and equity incentive compensation paid to or deferred by certain executives in the event the Company is required to prepare an accounting restatement due to material noncompliance with any financial reporting requirement under the federal securities laws, and the compensation would not have been awarded under the restated financial information, subject to the other terms and limitations set forth in the policy.

As disclosed in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024, filed with the SEC on July 1, 2025, the Company has restated its financial statements for certain periods, and has determined that it is required to conduct a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by its executive officers during the relevant recovery period in accordance with the requirements of Rule 10D-1 under the Exchange Act. In accordance with the Company’s Clawback Policy, this analysis will be performed by the Audit Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors, which will determine whether there was any erroneously awarded incentive-based compensation requiring recovery.

Anti-Hedging Policy

Our insider trading policy prohibits our directors, executive officers and employees from entering into any hedging transaction with respect to any of the Company’s securities. See “Corporate Governance and the Board of Directors — Anti-Hedging Policy” for more details.

Practices Related to the Grant of Certain Equity Awards

The Company does not currently grant new awards of stock options, stock appreciation rights or similar option-like instruments (“Options”). Accordingly, the Company has no specific policy or practice on the timing of awards of Options in relation to the disclosure of material nonpublic information by the Company. In the event the Company determines to grant new awards of Options, the Board will evaluate the appropriate steps to take in relation to the foregoing.

Benefits and Other Perquisites

The NEOs are eligible to participate in the same benefit plans offered to all of our full-time employees, including plans providing health, dental, vision, disability and basic group life insurance coverage and various retirement benefits. These plans are described in the “Executive Compensation — Other Compensation Programs” section below.

Regulatory Impact on Compensation

As a publicly traded financial institution, the Company is subject to additional regulatory requirements, most notably, the Interagency Guidelines Establishing Standards for Safety and Soundness (the “Safety and Soundness Standards”). The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the “FDIC”) has long held that excessive compensation is prohibited as an unsafe and unsound practice under the Safety and Soundness

28

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Standards. In describing a framework to determine whether compensation is excessive, the FDIC has indicated that financial institutions should consider whether aggregate cash amounts paid, or non-cash benefits provided, to employees are unreasonable or disproportionate to the services performed by an employee. The FDIC encourages financial institutions to review an employee’s compensation history and to consider internal pay equity, and, as appropriate, to consider benchmarking compensation to peer groups. Finally, the FDIC provides that, in order to give proper context, such an assessment must be made in light of the institution’s overall financial condition.

Additionally, the Compensation Committee must also take into account the joint agency Guidance on Sound Incentive Compensation Policies (the “Guidance”), which is intended to complement the Safety and Soundness Standards. The Guidance sets forth a framework for assessing and mitigating risk associated with incentive compensation plans, programs and arrangements maintained by financial institutions.

Other matters, such as accounting, tax and SEC requirements regarding risk assessment are also considered by the Compensation Committee as part of its compensation design and annual decisions.

29

TABLE OF CONTENTS​

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

We have reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this proxy statement with management. Based on our review and discussion with management, we have recommended to the board of directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy statement and in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024.

Submitted by:

Richard T. Ramos (Chair)
Jennifer L. DiMotta
Jeffrey C. Smith
Members of the Compensation Committee

30

TABLE OF CONTENTS​​

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The compensation reported in the Summary Compensation Table below is not necessarily indicative of how we will compensate our NEOs in the future. We will continue to review, evaluate and modify our compensation program to maintain a competitive total compensation package. As such, the compensation program in the future could vary from our historical practices.

Summary Compensation Table

The following table sets forth information regarding the compensation paid, awarded to, or earned for our fiscal years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022 by each of our NEOs.

Summary Compensation Table

Name and Principal Position

​

​

Year

​

​

Salary(1) ($)

​

​

Stock Awards(2) ($)

​

​

Option Awards(3) ($)

​

​

Non-Equity Incentive Plan  Compensation(4) ($)

​

​

All Other Compensation(5) ($)

​

​

Total ($)

​

Jeffrey G. Ludwig President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and Chief Executive Officer of the Bank

​

​

​

​

2024

​

​

​

​

​

749,800

​

​

​

​

​

562,276

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

130,233

​

​

​

​

​

23,934

​

​

​

​

​

1,466,243

​

​

​

​

​

2023

​

​

​

​

​

721,000

​

​

​

​

​

540,782

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

348,731

​

​

​

​

​

23,272

​

​

​

​

​

1,633,785

​

​

​

​

​

2022

​

​

​

​

​

700,000

​

​

​

​

​

262,494

​

​

​

​

​

257,050

​

​

​

​

​

535,816

​

​

​

​

​

22,373

​

​

​

​

​

1,777,733

​

​

Jeffrey S. Mefford Executive Vice President of the Company and President of the Bank

​

​

​

​

2024

​

​

​

​

​

525,000

​

​

​

​

​

341,112

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

82,223

​

​

​

​

​

22,252

​

​

​

​

​

970,587

​

​

​

​

​

2023

​

​

​

​

​

463,500

​

​

​

​

​

401,248

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

206,939

​

​

​

​

​

21,540

​

​

​

​

​

1,093,227

​

​

​

​

​

2022

​

​

​

​

​

450,000

​

​

​

​

​

146,244

​

​

​

​

​

143,211

​

​

​

​

​

318,147

​

​

​

​

​

20,687

​

​

​

​

​

1,078,289

​

​

Douglas J. Tucker Senior Vice President and Corporate Counsel

​

​

​

​

2024

​

​

​

​

​

400,000

​

​

​

​

​

199,914

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

42,950

​

​

​

​

​

10,500

​

​

​

​

​

653,364

​

​

​

​

​

2023

​

​

​

​

​

391,400

​

​

​

​

​

195,764

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

116,499

​

​

​

​

​

9,900

​

​

​

​

​

713,563

​

​

​

​

​

2022

​

​

​

​

​

380,000

​

​

​

​

​

95,013

​

​

​

​

​

93,026

​

​

​

​

​

181,430

​

​

​

​

​

9,150

​

​

​

​

​

758,619

​

​

Eric T. Lemke Chief Financial Officer of the Company and the Bank

​

​

​

​

2024

​

​

​

​

​

437,400

​

​

​

​

​

218,647

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

46,299

​

​

​

​

​

15,795

​

​

​

​

​

718,141

​

​

​

​

​

2023

​

​

​

​

​

405,020

​

​

​

​

​

202,475

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

119,889

​

​

​

​

​

14,815

​

​

​

​

​

742,199

​

​

​

​

​

2022

​

​

​

​

​

385,000

​

​

​

​

​

96,264

​

​

​

​

​

94,250

​

​

​

​

​

183,319

​

​

​

​

​

13,582

​

​

​

​

​

772,415

​

​

Daniel E. Casey(6) Senior Vice President and Chief Risk Officer of the Bank

​

​

​

​

2024

​

​

​

​

​

334,800

​

​

​

​

​

150,704

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

35,870

​

​

​

​

​

10,500

​

​

​

​

​

531,874

​

​

​

​

​

2023

​

​

​

​

​

206,250

​

​

​

​

​

196,245

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

61,875

​

​

​

​

​

6,312

​

​

​

​

​

470,682

​

​

​

(1)

The amounts set forth in the “Salary” column reflects base salary earned in each fiscal year.

​

(2)

The amounts set forth in the “Stock Awards” column reflect the aggregate grant date fair value of stock awards for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022 in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. The assumptions used in calculating the stock award amounts are set forth in Note 14 to our consolidated financial statements filed with the SEC on our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024.

​

(3)

The amounts set forth in the “Options Awards” column reflect aggregate grant date fair value of option awards in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. The assumptions used in calculating the option award amounts are set forth in Note 14 to our consolidated financial statements filed with the SEC on our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024.

​

(4)

The amounts set forth in the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column reflect annual cash incentive awards earned pursuant to the Bonus Plan, including, in Mr. Tucker’s case, amounts deferred under the Executive Deferred Compensation Plan in 2022.

​

(5)

The amounts set forth in the “All Other Compensation” column for the 2024 fiscal year are summarized below.

​

31

TABLE OF CONTENTS​

Name

​

​

Year

​

​

Perquisites(i) ($)

​

​

Company 401(k) Match(ii) ($)

​

​

Total “All Other Compensation” ($)

​

Jeffrey G. Ludwig

​

​

​

​

2024

​

​

​

​

​

13,434

​

​

​

​

​

10,500

​

​

​

​

​

23,934

​

​

Jeffrey S. Mefford

​

​

​

​

2024

​

​

​

​

​

11,752

​

​

​

​

​

10,500

​

​

​

​

​

22,252

​

​

Douglas J. Tucker

​

​

​

​

2024

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

10,500

​

​

​

​

​

10,500

​

​

Eric T. Lemke

​

​

​

​

2024

​

​

​

​

​

5,295

​

​

​

​

​

10,500

​

​

​

​

​

15,795

​

​

Daniel E. Casey

​

​

​

​

2024

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

10,500

​

​

​

​

​

10,500

​

​

​

(i)

The amounts set forth in the “Perquisites” column for Messrs. Ludwig and Mefford reflect club dues and the use of a Company-owned vehicle. Such amount for Mr. Lemke reflects club dues.

​

(ii)

The amounts set forth in the “Company 401(k) Match” column reflect Company matching contributions under the 401(k) Plan.

​

(6)

Mr. Casey was hired as Chief Risk Officer of the Bank on May 1, 2023.

​

Grants of Plan-Based Awards

The following table provides information on incentive compensation and equity grants awarded to our NEOs during 2024. All such grants were made under our 2019 LTIP, which is described in more detail below.

Grants of Plan-Based Awards

Name

​

​

Grant Date

​

​

Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards(1)

​

​

All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock or Units(2) (#)

​

​

Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards(3) ($)

​

​

Threshold ($)

​

​

Target ($)

​

​

Maximum ($)

​

Jeffrey G. Ludwig

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

243,685

​

​

​

​

​

487,370

​

​

​

​

​

731,055

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

11/07/24

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

20,110

​

​

​

​

​

562,276

​

​

Jeffrey S. Mefford

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

157,500

​

​

​

​

​

315,000

​

​

​

​

​

472,500

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

11/07/24

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

12,200

​

​

​

​

​

341,112

​

​

Douglas J. Tucker

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

80,000

​

​

​

​

​

160,000

​

​

​

​

​

240,000

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

11/07/24

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

7,150

​

​

​

​

​

199,914

​

​

Eric T. Lemke

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

87,840

​

​

​

​

​

174,960

​

​

​

​

​

262,440

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

11/07/24

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

7,820

​

​

​

​

​

218,647

​

​

Daniel E. Casey

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

50,220

​

​

​

​

​

100,440

​

​

​

​

​

150,660

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

11/07/24

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

5,390

​

​

​

​

​

150,704

​

​

​

(1)

The amounts set forth in the “Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards” columns reflect the threshold, target, and maximum payouts for performance under the Bonus Plan, assuming that the respective level of performance is attained for all applicable metrics, and are determined based on base salary, as described in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Annual Incentive Bonus — Corporate Bonus Plan.” The amount earned by each NEO for 2024 performance is included in the Summary Compensation Table in the column titled “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation.”

​

(2)

The amounts set forth in the “All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock or Units” column reflect restricted stock awards that vest in 25% increments on the first, second, third and fourth anniversary of the date of grant. These restricted stock awards are accelerated and vest in full upon an involuntary termination or non-assumption of the awards in connection with a change in control of the Company or upon the participant’s death or disability.

​

(3)

The amounts set forth in the “Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards” column reflect the aggregate grant date fair value of restricted stock in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718.

​

32

TABLE OF CONTENTS​

Outstanding Equity Awards

The following table provides information for each of our NEOs regarding outstanding stock options and unvested stock awards held by the officers as of December 31, 2024. Market values are presented as of the end of 2024 (based on the closing price of our common stock of $24.40 on December 31, 2024 (the last trading day of the year)) for outstanding stock awards, which include 2024 grants and prior-year grants.

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

Option Awards

​

​

Stock Awards

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options

​

​

Option Exercise Price ($)

​

​

Option Expiration Date

​

​

Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested(1) (#)

​

​

Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested ($)

​

Name

​

​

Grant Date

​

​

Exercisable (#)

​

​

Unexercisable (#)

​

Jeffrey G. Ludwig

​

​

​

​

11/7/24

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

20,110

​

​

​

​

​

490,684

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

11/6/23

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

17,527

​

​

​

​

​

427,659

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

10/31/22

​

​

​

​

​

26,146

​

​

​

​

​

26,145

​

​

​

​

​

28.43

​

​

​

​

​

10/31/32

​

​

​

​

​

4,616

​

​

​

​

​

112,630

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

11/1/21

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

3,622

​

​

​

​

​

88,377

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

11/16/16

​

​

​

​

​

8,383

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

28.59

​

​

​

​

​

11/16/26

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

11/3/15

​

​

​

​

​

16,800

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

23.00

​

​

​

​

​

11/03/25

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

51,329

​

​

​

​

​

26,145

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

45,875

​

​

​

​

​

1,119,350

​

​

Jeffrey S. Mefford

​

​

​

​

11/7/24

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

12,200

​

​

​

​

​

287,680

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

11/6/23

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

9,765

​

​

​

​

​

238,266

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

11/6/23

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

4,320

​

​

​

​

​

105,408

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

10/31/22

​

​

​

​

​

14,567

​

​

​

​

​

14,566

​

​

​

​

​

28.43

​

​

​

​

​

10/31/32

​

​

​

​

​

2,572

​

​

​

​

​

62,757

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

11/1/21

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

2,143

​

​

​

​

​

52,289

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

11/16/16

​

​

​

​

​

5,341

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

28.59

​

​

​

​

​

11/16/26

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

11/3/15

​

​

​

​

​

10,702

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

23.00

​

​

​

​

​

11/03/25

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

30,610

​

​

​

​

​

14,566

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

31,000

​

​

​

​

​

756,400

​

​

Douglas J. Tucker

​

​

​

​

11/7/24

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

7,150

​

​

​

​

​

174,460

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

11/6/23

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

6,345

​

​

​

​

​

154,818

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

10/31/22

​

​

​

​

​

9,462

​

​

​

​

​

9,462

​

​

​

​

​

28.43

​

​

​

​

​

10/31/32

​

​

​

​

​

1,671

​

​

​

​

​

40,772

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

11/1/21

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

1,553

​

​

​

​

​

37,893

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

11/16/16

​

​

​

​

​

5,405

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

28.59

​

​

​

​

​

11/16/26

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

14,867

​

​

​

​

​

9,462

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

16,719

​

​

​

​

​

407,943

​

​

Eric T. Lemke

​

​

​

​

11/7/24

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

7,820

​

​

​

​

​

190,808

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

11/6/23

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

6,562

​

​

​

​

​

160,113

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

10/31/22

​

​

​

​

​

9,587

​

​

​

​

​

9,586

​

​

​

​

​

28.43

​

​

​

​

​

10/31/32

​

​

​

​

​

1,693

​

​

​

​

​

41,309

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

11/1/21

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

1,364

​

​

​

​

​

33,282

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

9,587

​

​

​

​

​

9,586

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

17,439

​

​

​

​

​

425,512

​

​

Daniel E. Casey

​

​

​

​

11/7/24

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

5,390

​

​

​

​

​

131,516

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

11/6/23

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

4,740

​

​

​

​

​

115,656

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

5/1/23

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

1,875

​

​

​

​

​

45,740

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

0

​

​

​

​

​

0

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

12,005

​

​

​

​

​

292,922

​

​

33

TABLE OF CONTENTS​​

​

(1)

All awards in this column that remain subject to vesting vest in 25% increments on the first, second, third and fourth anniversary of the date of grant with the exception of 4,320 shares granted to Mr. Mefford in 2023, which 100% cliff vest on the fourth anniversary of the date of grant. Stock options and restricted stock awards granted under our 2019 LTIP are accelerated and vest in full upon an involuntary termination or cancellation of the awards in connection with a change in control of the Company or upon the participant’s death or disability. All of the outstanding stock option awards shown above granted before May 3, 2019 were granted under our 2010 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “2010 LTIP”). All of the other awards shown above were granted under our 2019 LTIP.

​

Option Exercises and Stock Vested in 2024

The following table sets forth information concerning the exercise of options and vesting of stock awards with respect to each NEO in 2024.

Option Exercises and Stock Vested Table

​

​

​

Option Awards

​

​

Stock Awards

​

Name

​

​

Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise (#)(1)

​

​

Value Realized on Exercise ($)(2)

​

​

Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting (#)(3)

​

​

Value Realized on Vesting ($)(4)

​

Jeffrey G. Ludwig

​

​

​

​

12,753

​

​

​

​

​

44,870

​

​

​

​

​

15,049

​

​

​

​

​

392,216

​

​

Jeffrey S. Mefford

​

​

​

​

10,846

​

​

​

​

​

42,784

​

​

​

​

​

8,623

​

​

​

​

​

224,453

​

​

Douglas J. Tucker

​

​

​

​

15,143

​

​

​

​

​

38,489

​

​

​

​

​

5,908

​

​

​

​

​

153,430

​

​

Eric T. Lemke

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

5,473

​

​

​

​

​

142,816

​

​

Daniel E. Casey

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

2,205

​

​

​

​

​

58,546

​

​

​

(1)

The amounts set forth in this column represent the total number of shares that were exercised before any withholding of shares to pay the exercise price and taxes.

​

(2)

The amounts set forth in this column are computed by determining the difference between the market value per share of our common stock on the date of exercise and the exercise price.

​

(3)

The amounts set forth in this column represent the number of shares of restricted stock that vested in 2024.

​

(4)

The amounts set forth in this column represent the number of shares of restricted stock that vested multiplied by the closing price of our common stock on the vesting date.

​

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation

The following table sets forth information concerning the benefits under the Company’s Executive Deferred Compensation Plan as of December 31, 2024.

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Table

Name (a)

​

​

Executive Contributions in Last FY ($) (b)

​

​

Registrant Contributions in Last FY ($) (c)

​

​

Aggregate Earnings in Last FY(1) ($) (d)

​

​

Aggregate Withdrawals/​ Distributions ($) (e)

​

​

Aggregate Balance at Last FYE(2) ($) (f)

​

Jeffrey G. Ludwig

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

Jeffrey S. Mefford

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

Douglas J. Tucker

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

38,760

​

​

​

​

​

(63,347)

​

​

​

​

​

769,390

​

​

Eric T. Lemke

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

Daniel E. Casey

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

34

TABLE OF CONTENTS​

​

(1)

The “Aggregate Earnings in Last FY” column does not include any amounts that are also reported in the Summary Compensation Table as the Executive Deferred Compensation Plan does not provide for above-market interest.

​

(2)

The “Aggregate Balance at Last FYE” column includes $657,142 reported as compensation in the Summary Compensation Table for Mr. Tucker in prior years.

​

Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control

The following table sets forth information concerning potential payments and benefits under our compensation programs and benefit plans, including individual employment agreements for Messrs. Ludwig, Mefford, Tucker and Lemke and the change of control agreement for Mr. Casey, pursuant to which the NEOs would be entitled upon various terminations of employment or a change in control as of the last business day of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024. For purposes of estimating the value of accelerated vesting of equity awards we have assumed a price per share of our common stock of $24.40 based on the market value of our common stock on December 31, 2024 (the last trading day of the year).

Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control Table

Name

​

​

Cash Severance Payments ($)(1)

​

​

COBRA Continuation ($)(2)

​

​

Accelerated Vesting of Equity Awards ($)(3)

​

​

Total Payments ($)

​

Jeffrey G. Ludwig

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

Involuntary Termination (not in connection with a change in control)(4)

​

​

​

​

1,088,060

​

​

​

​

​

23,200

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

1,111,260

​

​

Involuntary Termination (in connection with a change in control)(5)

​

​

​

​

3,264,180

​

​

​

​

​

69,600

​

​

​

​

​

1,119,350

​

​

​

​

​

4,453,130

​

​

Death or Disability

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

1,119,350

​

​

​

​

​

1,119,350

​

​

Jeffrey S. Mefford

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

Involuntary Termination (not in connection with a change in control)(4)

​

​

​

​

262,500

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

262,500

​

​

Involuntary Termination (in connection with a change in control)(5)

​

​

​

​

1,454,873

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

756,400

​

​

​

​

​

2,211,273

​

​

Death or Disability

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

756,400

​

​

​

​

​

756,400

​

​

Douglas J. Tucker

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

Involuntary Termination (not in connection with a change in control)(4)

​

​

​

​

256,813

​

​

​

​

​

13,891

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

270,704

​

​

Involuntary Termination (in connection with a change in control)(5)

​

​

​

​

1,027,253

​

​

​

​

​

27,782

​

​

​

​

​

407,943

​

​

​

​

​

1,462,978

​

​

Death or Disability

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

407,943

​

​

​

​

​

407,943

​

​

Eric T. Lemke

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

Involuntary Termination (not in connection with a change in control)(4)

​

​

​

​

168,231

​

​

​

​

​

23,200

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

191,431

​

​

Involuntary Termination (in connection with a change in control)(5)

​

​

​

​

1,107,805

​

​

​

​

​

46,400

​

​

​

​

​

425,512

​

​

​

​

​

1,579,717

​

​

Death or Disability

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

425,512

​

​

​

​

​

425,512

​

​

Daniel E. Casey

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

Involuntary Termination (not in connection with a change in control)(6)

​

​

​

​

25,754

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

25,754

​

​

Involuntary Termination (in connection with a change in control)(7)

​

​

​

​

551,073

​

​

​

​

​

22,161

​

​

​

​

​

292,922

​

​

​

​

​

866,156

​

​

Death or Disability

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

292,922

​

​

​

​

​

292,922

​

​

35

TABLE OF CONTENTS​

​

(1)

The amounts set forth in the “Cash Severance Payments” column reflect the sum of cash severance payments to be made pursuant to Messrs. Ludwig’s, Mefford’s, Tucker’s and Lemke’s employment agreements and Mr. Casey’s change of control agreement exclusive of any pro rata bonus payable on a termination of employment as annual incentive bonuses are earned as of December 31 and no additional amount would be payable to a NEO for a termination occurring on the last business day of the year. Please see the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column of the Summary Compensation Table for 2024 annual incentive compensation amounts.

​

(2)

The amounts set forth in the “COBRA Continuation” column reflect the employer-paid portion of COBRA premiums to be made pursuant to each NEO’s employment agreement or change of control agreement, as applicable, assuming each NEO was eligible for, and elected, COBRA coverage for the maximum period allowed by law. No value is reflected for Mr. Mefford as he did not participate in either our medical or dental plan as of December 31, 2024.

​

(3)

The amounts set forth in the “Accelerated Vesting of Equity Awards” column reflect the value of accelerated vesting of unvested restricted stock awards pursuant to our 2019 LTIP based on the market value of our common stock of $24.40 on December 31, 2024 (the last trading day of the year). In certain instances, the NEOs will also be entitled to accelerated vesting of the NEOs’ unvested options. As of December 31, 2024 (the last trading day of the year), the value of the Company’s stock was below the NEOs’ option exercise price and therefore no value is reflected on this table with respect to the acceleration of the NEOs’ options.

​

(4)

Involuntary Termination (not in connection with a change in control) means, pursuant to the terms of the NEO’s employment agreement, a termination by (i) the employer other than for cause, death or disability, or (ii) the NEO for good reason, in either case that does not occur within six months prior to, or 24 months following, a change in control.

​

(5)

Involuntary Termination (in connection with a change in control) means, pursuant to the terms of the NEO’s employment agreement, a termination by (i) the employer other than for cause, death or disability, or (ii) the NEO for good reason, in either case that occurs within six months prior to, or 24 months following, a change in control.

​

(6)

Involuntary Termination (not in connection with a change in control) means, pursuant to the terms of Mr. Casey’s change of control agreement, a termination by (i) the employer other than for cause, death or disability, or (ii) Mr. Casey for good reason, in either case that does not occur within six months prior to, or 24 months following, a change in control.

​

(7)

Involuntary Termination (in connection with a change in control) means, pursuant to the terms of the Mr. Casey’s change of control agreement, a termination by (i) the employer other than for cause, death or disability, or (ii) Mr. Casey for good reason, in either case that occurs within six months prior to, or 24 months following, a change in control.

​

Employment Agreements

We have entered into employment agreements with Messrs. Ludwig, Mefford, Tucker and Lemke. Each agreement generally describes the position and duties of each NEO, provides for a specified term of employment, describes base salary, bonus opportunity and other benefits and perquisites to which the executive officer is entitled, if any, sets forth the duties and obligations of each party in the event of a termination of employment prior to expiration of the employment term, and provides us with a measure of protection by obligating the NEO to abide by the terms of restrictive covenants during the terms of his employment and thereafter for a specified period of time. We entered into amended and restated agreements with Messrs. Ludwig, Mefford, Tucker and Lemke in November 2020.

Mr. Ludwig.   Our employment agreement with Mr. Ludwig, effective November 5, 2020, provides for an initial term of three years, with an automatic extension for an additional one-year period commencing on the first anniversary of the effective date and each anniversary thereafter, unless either party provides written notice of non-extension 90 days prior to the extension date. If a change in control of the Company occurs during the term of the agreement, the agreement will remain in effect for the two-year period following the change in control. Mr. Ludwig’s base salary is subject to annual review and increase at the

36

TABLE OF CONTENTS

discretion of our Compensation Committee, and his target bonus is required to be at least 65% of his base salary. The agreement also provides for Mr. Ludwig’s participation in the Company’s compensation and benefits plans, including the 2019 LTIP, in the same manner as other senior executives of the Company. Following Mr. Ludwig’s termination of employment, he will be subject to non-competition and non-solicitation restrictions for a period of 12 months. In the event Mr. Ludwig’s employment is terminated by the Company other than for cause, death, or disability, or he resigns for good reason, he will be entitled to a payment equal to 100% (300% if in connection with a change in control) of the sum of his salary plus the average of his bonus payments for the prior three years. He will also be entitled to COBRA coverage at employee rates for up to 12 months (36 months if in connection with a change in control) and a pro rata bonus for the year of termination.

Mr. Mefford.   Our employment agreement with Mr. Mefford, effective November 5, 2020, provides for an initial term of two years, with an automatic extension for an additional one-year period commencing on the first anniversary of the effective date and each anniversary thereafter, unless either party provides written notice of non-extension 90 days prior to the extension date. If a change in control of the Company occurs during the term of the agreement, the agreement will remain in effect for the two-year period following the change in control. Mr. Mefford’s base salary is subject to annual review and increase at the discretion of our Chief Executive Officer, and his target bonus is required to be at least 60% of his base salary. The agreement also provides for Mr. Mefford’s participation in the Company’s compensation and benefits plans, including the 2019 LTIP, in the same manner as other senior executives of the Company. Following Mr. Mefford’s termination of employment, he will be subject to non-competition and non-solicitation restrictions for a period of 12 months. In the event Mr. Mefford’s employment is terminated by the Company other than for cause, death, or disability, or he resigns for good reason, he will be entitled to receive severance pursuant to the Company’s general severance plan or policy in effect at the time of termination, or if such termination is in connection with a change in control, he will be entitled to a payment equal to 200% of the sum of his salary plus the average of his bonus payments for the prior three years. He will also be entitled to COBRA coverage at employee rates for up to 12 months (24 months if in connection with a change in control) and, if such termination is in connection with a change in control, a pro rata bonus for the year of termination.

Mr. Tucker.   As noted above, Mr. Tucker retired from the Company was effective January 3, 2025. The discussion below describes his employment agreement as it was in effect at the end of 2024. The discussion is intended to provide context to the “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control Table” included above. The employment agreement with Mr. Tucker provided Mr. Tucker with an annual base salary, target bonus opportunity, and eligibility for participation in the Company’s compensation and benefits plans, including the 2019 LTIP, in the same manner as other senior executives of the Company. Following any termination of employment, Mr. Tucker would be subject to non-competition and non-solicitation restrictions for a period of 12 months. Had a termination of employment occurred prior to his retirement on January 3, 2025, in the event such termination was by the Company other than for cause, death, or disability, or he resigned for good reason, he would have been entitled to a payment equal to 50% (200% if in connection with a change in control) of the sum of his salary plus the average of his bonus payments for the prior three years. He would also have been entitled to COBRA coverage at employee rates for up to 12 months (24 months if in connection with a change in control) and, if such termination was in connection with a change in control, a pro rata bonus for the year of termination. Upon his retirement on January 3, 2025, Mr. Tucker was eligible for a bonus payment consistent with the terms of the Company’s Career Transition Bonus program described below.

Mr. Lemke.   Our employment agreement with Mr. Lemke, effective November 5, 2020, provides for an initial term of two years, with an automatic renewal for additional one-year periods commencing on each anniversary thereafter, unless either party provides written notice of nonrenewal 90 days prior to the extension date. If a change in control of the Company occurs during the term of the agreement, the agreement will remain in effect for the two-year period following the change in control. Mr. Lemke’s base salary is subject to annual review and increase at the discretion of our Chief Executive Officer and his target bonus is required to be at least 40% of his base salary. The agreement also provides for Mr. Lemke’s participation in the Company’s compensation and benefits plans, including the 2019 LTIP, in the same manner as other senior executives of the Company. Following Mr. Lemke’s termination of employment, he will generally be subject to non-solicitation (and non-competition unless such termination is due to good reason) restrictions

37

TABLE OF CONTENTS​

for a period of 12 months. In the event Mr. Lemke’s employment is terminated by the Company other than for cause, death, or disability, or he resigns for good reason, he will be entitled to receive severance pursuant to the Company’s general severance plan or policy in effect at the time of termination, or if such termination is in connection with a change in control, he will be entitled to a payment equal to 200% of the sum of his salary plus the average of his bonus payments for the prior three years. He will also be entitled to COBRA coverage at employee rates for up to 12 months (24 months if in connection with a change in control) and, if such termination is in connection with a change in control, a pro rata bonus for the year of termination.

Our obligation to pay any severance under each of the amended and restated employment agreements is conditioned on the execution by the NEO of a general release and waiver of any and all claims with respect to their employment with the Company.

Change of Control Agreement

Mr. Casey.   Our change of control agreement with Mr. Casey, effective May 3, 2023, provides for an initial term through December 31, 2023, with an automatic renewal for additional one-year periods commencing on each January 1 thereafter, unless either party provides written notice of nonrenewal 90 days prior to December 31 of each year. If a change in control of the Company occurs during the term of the agreement, the agreement will remain in effect for a one-year period following the change in control. Following Mr. Casey’s termination of employment, he will generally be subject to non-solicitation and non-competition restrictions for a period of 12 months. In the event Mr. Casey’s employment is terminated by the Company other than for cause, death, or disability, or he resigns for good reason, in any case, not in connection with a change in control, he will be entitled to receive severance pursuant to the Company’s general severance plan or policy in effect at the time of termination, or if such termination is in connection with a change in control, he will be entitled to a payment equal to 150% of the sum of his salary plus the average of his bonus payments for the prior three years. He will also be entitled to COBRA coverage at employee rates for up to 12 months. Our obligation to make payments to Mr. Casey under his change of control agreement is conditioned on his execution of a general release and waiver of any and all claims with respect to his employment with the Company.

Long Term Incentive Plans

Equity based incentive awards are currently made though the Company’s 2019 LTIP. The Company also maintains the 2010 LTIP. As of the effective date of the 2019 LTIP, no further awards may be granted under the 2010 LTIP. However, any previously outstanding incentive award granted under the 2010 LTIP remains subject to the terms of such plan until the time it is no longer outstanding.

Midland States Bancorp, Inc. 2019 Long-Term Incentive Plan.   The 2019 LTIP, which was amended and restated on May 1, 2023, was adopted by our board on February 5, 2019 and became effective upon approval by our shareholders on May 3, 2019. The 2019 LTIP was designed to ensure continued availability of equity awards that will assist the Company in attracting, retaining and rewarding key employees, directors and other service providers. Pursuant to the 2019 LTIP, the Compensation Committee is allowed to grant awards to eligible persons in the form of qualified and non-qualified stock options, restricted stock, restricted stock units, stock appreciation rights and other incentive awards. Awards vest, become exercisable and contain such other terms and conditions as determined by the Compensation Committee and set forth in individual agreements with the employees receiving the awards. The plan enables the Compensation Committee to set specific performance criteria that must be met before an award vests under the plan. The 2019 LTIP allows for acceleration of vesting and exercise privileges of grants if a participant’s termination of employment is due to a change in control, death or total disability. If a participant’s job is terminated for cause, then all unvested awards expire at the date of termination. Up to 1,550,000 shares of common stock may be issued under the plan (all of which may be granted as incentive stock options), which includes an additional 550,000 shares approved by shareholders as of May 1, 2023. As of December 31, 2024, there were 398,580 shares available for issuance under the 2019 LTIP.

Midland States Bancorp, Inc. Second Amended and Restated 2010 Long-Term Incentive Plan.   The 2010 LTIP was adopted by our board on October 18, 2010 and approved by our shareholders on November 23, 2010. The 2010 LTIP was amended and restated December 31, 2010 and further amended

38

TABLE OF CONTENTS​

and restated February 2, 2016. The 2016 restatement, which was not submitted to shareholders for approval, increased the number of shares available for issuance under the plan by 1,000,000. The 2010 LTIP was designed to ensure continued availability of equity awards to assist the Company in attracting, retaining and rewarding key employees, directors and other service providers. Pursuant to the 2010 LTIP, the Compensation Committee was allowed to grant awards to eligible persons in the form of qualified and non-qualified stock options, restricted stock, restricted stock units, stock appreciation rights and other incentive awards. Up to 2,000,000 shares of common stock were available for issuance under the plan (the initial 1,000,000 of which were eligible to be granted as incentive stock options). Upon approval of our 2019 LTIP, no additional grants were permitted to be made under the 2010 LTIP. Awards vest, become exercisable and contain such other terms and conditions as determined by the Compensation Committee and set forth in individual agreements with the employees receiving the awards. The plan enabled the Compensation Committee to set specific performance criteria that must be met before an award vests under the plan. The 2010 LTIP allowed for acceleration of vesting and exercise privileges of grants upon a change in control or if a participant’s termination of employment is due to death or total disability. If a participant’s job is terminated for cause, then all unvested awards expire at the date of termination.

Other Compensation Programs

Midland States Bank 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan.   The Midland States Bank 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan (the “401(k) Plan”) is designed to provide retirement benefits to all eligible full-time and part-time employees of the Bank and its subsidiaries. The 401(k) Plan provides employees with the opportunity to save for retirement on a tax-favored basis. Our NEOs, all of whom were eligible during 2024, may elect to participate in the 401(k) Plan on the same basis as all other employees. Employees may defer 1% to 100% of their compensation to the 401(k) Plan up to the applicable statutory limit. We currently match employee contributions on the first 6% of employee compensation (50 cents for each $1). The Company match is contributed in the form of cash and is invested according to the employee’s current investment allocation. The Company has the authority to make an annual discretionary profit-sharing contribution to the 401(k) Plan, but does not currently do so.

Amended and Restated Midland States Bancorp, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan.   We maintain the Amended and Restated Midland States Bancorp, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan (Amended and Restated May 3, 2019 and May 1, 2023) (the “ESPP”) for the benefit of our eligible employees. The ESPP is not intended to constitute an “employee stock purchase plan” within the meaning of Section 423 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). Currently, any employee who is employed by us or any one of our subsidiaries is eligible to participate in the ESPP starting with the first applicable offering period that begins following such employee’s first day of employment. Pursuant to the ESPP, participating employees are permitted to use after-tax dollars, up to a maximum of $25,000 per calendar year of their compensation, to purchase shares of our common stock at the end of each calendar quarter. The purchase price for the stock is currently 90% of the stock’s fair market value as of the first day of each quarterly offering period. While the Compensation Committee could elect a different discount percentage, it does not expect to do so in the foreseeable future. At any time our common stock is listed for trading on a principal national securities exchange, including the Nasdaq Global Select Market, the fair market value under the ESPP is deemed to be the officially quoted closing selling price of the shares on the applicable day. The maximum number of shares that may be issued under the ESPP is 600,000, which includes the 300,000 originally subject to the ESPP, an additional 200,000 shares approved by shareholders as of May 3, 2019, and an additional 100,000 shares approved by shareholders as of May 1, 2023. As of December 31, 2024, there were 168,476 shares available for issuance under the ESPP.

Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors and Executives.   Effective as of November 8, 2018, we maintain two separate deferred compensation plans for the benefit of our non-employee directors and executives which are the Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors of Midland States Bancorp, Inc., as amended November 5, 2020 and February 1, 2021, (the “Director Deferred Compensation Plan”) and the Deferred Compensation Plan for Executives of Midland States Bancorp, Inc., as amended November 5, 2020, (the “Executive Deferred Compensation Plan”), respectively. The plans provide non-employee directors and executives an opportunity to better plan for their financial futures by providing a vehicle for the deferral of current income taxation. Under the plans, non-employee directors and eligible senior executives are permitted to elect to defer all or a portion of their annual director fees (in whatever form), salary and/or

39

TABLE OF CONTENTS​

bonus, as the case may be. Any deferrals are credited to a plan account and earn interest based on the notional investment elections of the executives from a selection of measurement funds generally available to participants under the 401(k) Plan. One available notional investment alternative for directors is Company stock units, which track the value of our common stock. For plan years beginning prior to January 1, 2021, participants were permitted to elect to receive their distributions in a lump sum or monthly installments over a period of two to 15 years. Starting with the plan year beginning on January 1, 2021, participants have been permitted to elect to receive their distributions in a lump sum or annual installments over a period of two to five years.

Severance Policy.   Under our severance policy, we have the discretion to pay severance to Midland employees, including our NEOs, who are terminated without cause, in connection with a reduction in our workforce, due to the elimination of their job or position, or as a result of a voluntary Midland-initiated early retirement. Pursuant to the terms of the applicable employment or change in control agreement, Messrs. Mefford, Lemke, and Casey are entitled to receive severance under our severance policy if each such NEO is terminated without cause, other than due to death or disability, or resigns for good reason, in each case, not in connection with a change in control. In such instances, the applicable NEO will receive severance equal to four weeks of base salary for each year of continuous service, up to a maximum of 26 weeks of severance. To receive any severance under our severance policy, the applicable NEO would need to execute a settlement agreement and general release.

Career Transition Bonus.   Other than Mr. Ludwig, each of our NEOs who has attained age 60 with at least 10 years of service or age 65 with at least five years of service is eligible to receive a career transition bonus of, for Mr. Casey, 35%, or, for each other eligible NEO, 40% of their annual base salary if the NEO provides an 18 month notice of intention to retire, makes a good faith attempt to transfer knowledge and train the NEO’s successor, meets or exceeds performance expectations through the notice period, executes a release, and successfully transitions, as determined by Mr. Ludwig, the NEO’s duties.

Health and Welfare Benefits.   Our NEOs are eligible to participate in our standard health and welfare benefits program, which offers medical, dental, vision, life, accident, and disability coverage to all of our eligible employees. We do not provide our NEOs with any health and welfare benefits that are not generally available to our other employees.

Perquisites.   We provide our NEOs with certain perquisites that we believe are reasonable and consistent with our overall compensation program to better enable us to attract and retain superior employees for key positions. The Compensation Committee periodically reviews the levels of perquisites and other personal benefits provided to our NEOs. Based on this periodic review, perquisites are awarded or adjusted on an individual basis. The perquisites received by our NEOs in 2024 included allowances for annual country club/social club dues and use of a Company-owned automobile. With respect to our NEOs, country club allowances are provided only to Messrs. Ludwig, Mefford and Lemke and the use of a Company car is provided only to Messrs. Ludwig and Mefford.

CEO Pay Ratio

Pursuant to SEC rules, we are providing information about the relationship of the annual total compensation of Mr. Jeffrey G. Ludwig, our Chief Executive Officer, to the annual total compensation of our median employee.

To determine the median employee, a list of all active full and part-time employees as of December 31, 2023, excluding Mr. Ludwig, was prepared with the corresponding annual total W-2 compensation as reflected in our payroll records. A total of 903 employees were included. Compensation was annualized for any individual not employed for the full calendar year of 2024. Annual total W-2 compensation was ranked from lowest to highest, and the median employee was selected from the list.

Mr. Ludwig had 2024 total compensation of $1,466,243, as reflected in the Summary Compensation Table included in this proxy statement. The median employee annual total compensation for 2024, using the methodology that was used to calculate Mr. Ludwig’s compensation in the Summary Compensation Table, was $64,853. As a result, the CEO pay ratio is 22.6.

40

TABLE OF CONTENTS

This pay ratio is a reasonable estimate calculated in a manner consistent with SEC rules based on our payroll and employment records and the methodology described above. Because the SEC rules for identifying the median employee and calculating the pay ratio allow companies to adopt a variety of methodologies, apply certain exclusions, and make reasonable estimates and assumptions that reflect their compensation practices, the pay ratio reported by other companies may not be comparable to the pay ratio reported above.

41

TABLE OF CONTENTS​

PAY VERSUS PERFORMANCE

In accordance with rules adopted by the SEC pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (the “Dodd-Frank Act”), we provide the following disclosure regarding executive “compensation actually paid” ​(“CAP”) and certain Company performance for the fiscal years listed below. You should refer to our CD&A for a complete description of how executive compensation relates to Company performance and how the Compensation Committee makes its decisions.

The Pay Versus Performance table below summarizes the compensation values both previously reported in our Summary Compensation Table and as required to be adjusted by the rules adopted by the SEC pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Act for the 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021 and 2020 calendar years.

Year

​

​

Summary Compensation Table Total for CEO(1)

​

​

Compensation Actually Paid to CEO(2)

​

​

Average Summary Compensation Table Total for Non-CEO NEOs(1)

​

​

Average Compensation Actually Paid to Non-CEO NEOs(2)

​

​

Value of Initial Fixed $100 Invested Based on:

​

​

Midland Net Income (in millions)(5)

​

​

Company- Selected Measure

​

​

Midland Total Shareholder Return(3)

​

​

Peer Group Total Shareholder Return(4)

​

​

Midland Adjusted Earnings Per Share (EPS)(5)(6)

​

2024

​

​

​

$

1,466,243

​

​

​

​

$

1,219,797

​

​

​

​

$

718,492

​

​

​

​

$

626,447

​

​

​

​

$

108.65

​

​

​

​

$

123.79

​

​

​

​

$

38.04

​

​

​

​

$

1.32

​

​

2023

​

​

​

$

1,633,785

​

​

​

​

$

1,733,495

​

​

​

​

$

754,918

​

​

​

​

$

803,689

​

​

​

​

$

116.50

​

​

​

​

$

107.99

​

​

​

​

$

61.16

​

​

​

​

$

2.78

​

​

2022

​

​

​

$

1,777,733

​

​

​

​

$

1,851,719

​

​

​

​

$

825,247

​

​

​

​

$

857,590

​

​

​

​

$

106.74

​

​

​

​

$

107.95

​

​

​

​

$

100.24

​

​

​

​

$

4.01

​

​

2021

​

​

​

$

1,581,174

​

​

​

​

$

1,806,916

​

​

​

​

$

805,976

​

​

​

​

$

903,099

​

​

​

​

$

95.30

​

​

​

​

$

119.79

​

​

​

​

$

81.32

​

​

​

​

$

3.65

​

​

2020

​

​

​

$

1,027,328

​

​

​

​

$

756,598

​

​

​

​

$

547,076

​

​

​

​

$

431,468

​

​

​

​

$

65.66

​

​

​

​

$

89.23

​

​

​

​

$

22.54

​

​

​

​

$

1.70

​

​

​

(1)

Mr. Ludwig served as Midland’s CEO for 2020 through 2024. Messrs. Mefford, Tucker, and Lemke served as non-CEO NEOs for 2020 through 2024. Mr. Stewart was an NEO for 2020 through 2022. Mr. Casey was an NEO in 2023 and 2024. The dollar amounts reported are from the “Total” column of the Summary Compensation Table for the CEO and the average of such column for non-CEO NEOs for each reported fiscal year.

​

(2)

The dollar amounts reported represent CAP, as calculated in accordance with SEC rules. For additional information with respect to the calculation of CAP for 2024, see the section titled “Calculation of Compensation Actually Paid” below.

​

(3)

Reflects the cumulative total shareholder return (“TSR”) of Midland, as provided by S&P Cap IQ, as of the last day of each reported fiscal year, based on an initial fixed investment of $100 on December 31, 2019.

​

(4)

Reflects the cumulative total shareholder return of the S&P Small Cap 600 Banks Index, as of the last day of each reported fiscal year, based on an initial fixed investment of $100 on December 31, 2019. The S&P Small Cap 600 Banks Index is the peer group used in Midland’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023.

​

(5)

The Company has restated the consolidated financial statements (i) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2023 and (ii) for the year ended December 31, 2022, to correct certain errors, as presented in the audited financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2024 included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024, filed with the SEC on July 1, 2025. The Net Income and Adjusted EPS metrics in this table have been revised for those years. While the Company's financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 were also affected by these errors, the Company is not required to restate those financial statements, and accordingly the data for those years remains as previously reported.

​

(6)

Adjusted earnings per share (“Adjusted EPS”) is the Company-Selected Measure and is a non-GAAP financial measure. As calculated from Midland’s audited financial statements, Adjusted EPS equals our earnings, as adjusted for certain items, including loss on sales of investment securities, net, and gain on repurchase of subordinated debt.

​

42

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Calculation of Compensation Actually Paid

To calculate the amount of CAP to our CEO and non-CEO NEOs for 2024 in the table above according to SEC rules, the following adjustments were made to the amounts reported in the “Total” column of the Summary Compensation Table for 2024.

43

TABLE OF CONTENTS

​

​

​

2024

​

​

​

​

CEO

​

​

Average Non- CEO NEOs

​

Total Compensation from Summary Compensation Table

​

​

​

$

1,466,243

​

​

​

​

$

718,492

​

​

Adjustments for Pension

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

Adjustment Summary Compensation Table Pension

​

​

​

$

—

​

​

​

​

$

—

​

​

Amount added for current year service cost

​

​

​

$

—

​

​

​

​

$

—

​

​

Amount added for prior service cost impacting current year

​

​

​

$

—

​

​

​

​

$

—

​

​

Total Adjustments for Pension

​

​

​

$

—

​

​

​

​

$

—

​

​

Adjustments for Equity Awards

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

Adjustment for grant date values in the Summary Compensation Table

​

​

​

$

(562,276)

​

​

​

​

$

(227,594)

​

​

Year-end fair value of unvested awards granted in the current year

​

​

​

$

490,684

​

​

​

​

$

198,616

​

​

Year-over-year difference of year-end fair values for unvested awards granted in prior years

​

​

​

$

(143,416)

​

​

​

​

$

(55,166)

​

​

Fair values at vest date for awards granted and vested in current year

​

​

​

$

—

​

​

​

​

$

—

​

​

Difference in fair values between prior year-end fair values and vest date fair values for awards granted in prior years

​

​

​

$

(83,619)

​

​

​

​

$

(29,319)

​

​

Forfeitures during current year equal to prior year-end fair value

​

​

​

$

—

​

​

​

​

$

—

​

​

Dividends or dividend equivalents not otherwise included in total compensation

​

​

​

$

52,181

​

​

​

​

$

21,419

​

​

Total Adjustments for Equity Awards

​

​

​

$

(246,446)

​

​

​

​

$

(92,044)

​

​

Compensation Actually Paid (as calculated)

​

​

​

$

1,219,797

​

​

​

​

$

626,447

​

​

Financial Performance Measures

As described in greater detail in the CD&A, a substantial portion our NEOs’ compensation is directly linked to the achievement of financial and operational metrics, as well as other strategic goals with rigorous targets that align with the Company’s business strategy, compensation philosophy, shareholder interests and, most importantly, our long-term goals. In addition to the Pay Versus Performance table above, the following is a tabular list of the most important financial measures we use to link CAP to our NEOs to Midland performance. The Company-Selected Measure is denoted with an asterisk.

List of Performance Measures

​

Financial

​

Adjusted EPS*

Adjusted PTPP Income

Adjusted Revenue

Pay Versus Performance: Graphical Description

The following graphs present the relationship during 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021 and 2020 between CAP for our CEO and, on an average basis, our non-CEO NEOs and:

•

the Company’s cumulative TSR and the Peer Group’s cumulative TSR;

​

•

the Company’s Net Income; and

​

•

the Company-Selected Measure, which for Midland is Adjusted EPS.

​

44

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Relationship between CAP and Cumulative TSR / Cumulative TSR of the Peer Group

The below chart shows the CEO and average non-CEO NEO CAP relative to Midland’s cumulative TSR and the cumulative TSR of the U.S. Small Cap 600 Banks Index utilized in Midland’s most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Midland does not use TSR to determine compensation level or incentive plan payouts.

Relationship between CAP and Midland’s Net Income

The below chart shows our CEO and average non-CEO NEO CAP relative to Midland’s net income. Midland does not use net income to determine compensation levels or incentive plan payouts. The Company has restated the consolidated financial statements (i) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2023 and (ii) for the year ended December 31, 2022, to correct certain errors, as presented in the audited financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2024 in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024, filed with the SEC on July 1, 2025. The Net Income metrics in this chart have been revised for those years. While the Company’s financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 were also affected by these errors, the Company is not required to restate those financial statements, and accordingly the data for those years remains as previously reported.

45

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Relationship between CAP and Adjusted EPS

The below table shows the CEO and average non-CEO NEO CAP relative to the Company-Selected Measure — Adjusted Earnings Per Share. Midland uses Adjusted EPS to determine a portion of the payouts under the Bonus Plan. The Company has restated the consolidated financial statements (i) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2023 and (ii) for the year ended December 31, 2022, to correct certain errors, as presented in the audited financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2024 in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024, filed with the SEC on July 1, 2025. The Adjusted EPS metrics in this chart have been revised for those years. While the Company’s financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 were also affected by these errors, the Company is not required to restate those financial statements, and accordingly the data for those years remains as previously reported.

46

TABLE OF CONTENTS​

PROPOSAL 2 — ADVISORY (NON-BINDING) VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

We are required under applicable law to permit a separate shareholder vote to approve the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers, as disclosed pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the SEC. In accordance with these requirements, we are providing shareholders with an advisory vote on the compensation of our executive officers.

As described in more detail in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this proxy statement, the overall objectives of the Company’s compensation programs have been to align executive officer compensation with the success of meeting long-term strategic operating and financial goals. Shareholders are urged to read the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this proxy statement, as well as the Summary Compensation Table and other related compensation tables and narrative disclosure that describe the compensation of our named executive officers in 2024. The Compensation Committee and the board of directors believe that the policies and procedures articulated in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section are effective in implementing our compensation philosophy and achieving its goals, and that the compensation of our executive officers in fiscal year 2024 reflects and supports these compensation policies and procedures.

The following resolution is submitted for shareholder approval:

“RESOLVED, that Midland States Bancorp, Inc.’s shareholders approve, on an advisory basis, its executive compensation as described in the section captioned ‘Compensation Discussion and Analysis’ and the tabular disclosure regarding named executive officer compensation under ‘Executive Compensation’ contained in the Company’s proxy statement for the 2025 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.”

Approval of this resolution requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares represented at the meeting and entitled to vote on such proposal. While this advisory vote on executive compensation, commonly referred to as a “say-on-pay” advisory vote, is required, it is not binding on our board of directors and may not be construed as overruling any decision by the board. However, the Compensation Committee will take into account the outcome of the vote when considering future compensation arrangements.

The board of directors unanimously recommends that you vote to approve the overall compensation of our named executive officers by voting “FOR” this proposal.

47

TABLE OF CONTENTS​

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS

The following table sets forth information as of June 6, 2025, regarding the beneficial ownership of our common stock and our depositary shares, each representing a 1/40th interest in a share of the Company’s 7.75% fixed rate reset non-cumulative perpetual preferred stock, Series A (“Series A Depositary Shares”), by:

•

each shareholder known by us to beneficially own more than 5% of such class of securities;

​

•

each of our directors and director nominees;

​

•

each of our NEOs; and

​

•

all of our directors and executive officers as a group.

​

We have determined beneficial ownership in accordance with the rules of the SEC. These rules generally provide that a person is the beneficial owner of securities if such person has or shares the power to vote or direct the voting of securities, or to dispose or direct the disposition of securities, or has the right to acquire such powers within 60 days. For purposes of calculating each person’s percentage ownership, common stock issuable pursuant to options exercisable within 60 days are included as outstanding and beneficially owned for that person or group but are not deemed outstanding for the purposes of computing the percentage ownership of any other person. Except as disclosed in the footnotes to this table and subject to applicable community property laws, we believe that each person identified in the table has sole voting and investment power over all of the shares shown opposite such person’s name.

The percentages of beneficial ownership are based on 21,879,916 shares of our common stock, and 4,600,000 Series A Depositary Shares, in each case outstanding as of June 6, 2025.

Unless otherwise provided, the address for each shareholder listed in the table below is: c/o Midland States Bancorp, Inc., 1201 Network Centre Drive, Effingham, Illinois 62401.

​

​

​

Common Stock

​

​

Series A Depositary Shares

​

Name

​

​

Shares Beneficially Owned(1)

​

​

Percent of Class

​

​

Shares Beneficially Owned

​

​

Percent of Class

​

5% Shareholders

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

BlackRock, Inc.(2)

​

​

​

​

1,400,429

​

​

​

​

​

6.40%

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

Dimensional Fund Advisors LP(3)

​

​

​

​

1,371,940

​

​

​

​

​

6.27%

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

The Vanguard Group(4)

​

​

​

​

1,138,823

​

​

​

​

​

5.20%

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

Directors and NEOs

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

Jeffrey G. Ludwig(5)

​

​

​

​

434,322

​

​

​

​

​

1.98%

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

Eric T. Lemke(6)

​

​

​

​

38,746

​

​

​

​

​

*

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

Douglas J. Tucker(7)

​

​

​

​

63,387

​

​

​

​

​

*

​

​

​

​

​

4,300

​

​

​

​

​

*

​

​

Jeffrey S. Mefford(8)

​

​

​

​

87,546

​

​

​

​

​

*

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

Daniel E. Casey

​

​

​

​

13,569

​

​

​

​

​

*

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

R. Dean Bingham(9)

​

​

​

​

86,392

​

​

​

​

​

*

​

​

​

​

​

4,000

​

​

​

​

​

*

​

​

Gerald J. Carlson(10)

​

​

​

​

5,024

​

​

​

​

​

*

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

Jennifer L. DiMotta(11)​

​

​

​

​

7,207

​

​

​

​

​

*

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

Travis J. Franklin(12)

​

​

​

​

4,358

​

​

​

​

​

*

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

Jerry L. McDaniel(13)

​

​

​

​

174,221

​

​

​

​

​

*

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

Jeffrey M. McDonnell(14)​

​

​

​

​

48,598

​

​

​

​

​

*

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

Richard T. Ramos(15)​

​

​

​

​

67,249

​

​

​

​

​

*

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

Robert F. Schultz(16)​

​

​

​

​

304,616

​

​

​

​

​

1.41%

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

Jeffrey C. Smith(17)​

​

​

​

​

43,726

​

​

​

​

​

*

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

All directors and executive officers as a group (13 persons)(18)

​

​

​

​

1,167,748

​

​

​

​

​

5.27%

​

​

​

​

​

8,300

​

​

​

​

​

*

​

​

​

*

Indicates one percent or less.

​

48

TABLE OF CONTENTS

(1)

Beneficial ownership includes shares of unvested restricted stock that officers are entitled to vote but does not include common stock equivalent units owned by directors or officers under the Director Deferred Compensation Plan or Executive Deferred Compensation Plan.

​

(2)

Information is based solely on the Schedule 13G filed on April 15, 2025 by BlackRock, Inc. The address of BlackRock, Inc. is 50 Hudson Yards, New York, New York 10001.

​

(3)

Information is based solely on Amendment No. 1 to the Schedule 13G filed on February 9, 2024. The address of Dimensional Fund Advisors LP is 6300 Bee Cave Road, Building One, Austin, TX 78746.

​

(4)

Information is based solely on the Schedule 13G filed on February 13, 2024. The address of The Vanguard Group is 100 Vanguard Blvd., Malvern, PA 19355.

​

(5)

Includes (i) 11,569 shares of common stock held by JQ Properties, LLC; and (ii) 63,118 shares of common stock subject to stock options that are currently exercisable or are exercisable within 60 days of June 6, 2025. Of these shares, an aggregate of 111,569 shares are pledged to secure indebtedness. Mr. Ludwig is a manager and a member of, and has shared voting and investment power over the shares of common stock held by, JQ Properties, LLC, but disclaims beneficial ownership of such shares except to the extent of his pecuniary interest therein.

​

(6)

Includes 9,587 shares of common stock subject to stock options that are currently exercisable or are exercisable within 60 days of June 6, 2025.

​

(7)

Includes 24,329 shares of common stock subject to stock options that are currently exercisable or are exercisable within 60 days of June 6, 2025.

​

(8)

Includes 30,610 shares of common stock subject to stock options that are currently exercisable or are exercisable within 60 days of June 6, 2025.

​

(9)

Includes (i) 42,554 shares owned by Agracel, Inc.; and (ii) an aggregate of 16,138 shares that may be issuable pursuant to restricted stock units or pursuant to common stock equivalent units under the Deferred Compensation Plan within 60 days of June 6, 2025. Mr. Bingham is the Chief Executive Officer of, and shares voting and dispositive of the shares held by, Agracel, Inc., but disclaims beneficial ownership of such shares except to the extent of his pecuniary interest therein.

​

(10)

Includes an aggregate of 1,024 shares that may be issuable pursuant to restricted stock units or pursuant to common stock equivalent units under the Deferred Compensation Plan within 60 days of June 6, 2025.

​

(11)

Includes an aggregate of 3,006 shares that are issuable pursuant to restricted stock units or pursuant to common stock equivalent units under the Deferred Compensation Plan within 60 days of June 6, 2025.

​

(12)

Includes an aggregate of 4,358 shares that may be issuable pursuant to restricted stock units or pursuant to common stock equivalent units under the Deferred Compensation Plan within 60 days of June 6, 2025.

​

(13)

Includes an aggregate of 37,598 shares that may be issuable pursuant to restricted stock units or pursuant to common stock equivalent units under the Deferred Compensation Plan within 60 days of June 6, 2025.

​

(14)

Includes (i) 24,245 shares of common stock held by the Jeffrey M. McDonnell Revocable Trust UA; and (ii) an aggregate of 22,366 shares that may be issuable pursuant to restricted stock units or pursuant to common stock equivalent units under the Deferred Compensation Plan within 60 days of June 6, 2025. Mr. McDonnell is the beneficiary of, and has voting and investment power over the shares held by, the Jeffrey M. McDonnell Revocable Trust UA, but disclaims beneficial ownership thereof except to the extent of his pecuniary interest therein.

​

(15)

Includes (i) 1,000 shares of common stock held by Mr. Ramos’ children; and (ii) an aggregate of 48,744 shares that may be issuable pursuant to restricted stock units or pursuant to common stock equivalent units under the Deferred Compensation Plan within 60 days of June 6, 2025. Mr. Ramos disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares held by his children.

​

(16)

Includes (i) 30,153 shares of common stock held by Red Bird Investors LLC; (ii) 200,030 shares of common stock held by J.M. Schultz Investment, L.L.C.; (iii) 37,846 shares of common stock held by Summit Investors, LLP; and (iv) 4,470 shares of common stock may be issuable pursuant to restricted

​

49

TABLE OF CONTENTS

stock units or pursuant to common stock equivalent units under the Deferred Compensation Plan within 60 days of June 6, 2025. Robert Schultz is: (a) the managing member of J.M. Schultz Investment, L.L.C.; (b) the managing member of Red Bird Investors LLC; and (c) the managing member of Summit Investors, LLP. He has voting and investment power over the shares held by J.M. Schultz Investment, L.L.C., Red Bird Investors LLC, and Summit Investors, LLP but disclaims beneficial ownership of these shares except to the extent of his pecuniary interest therein. Mr. Schultz disclaims beneficial ownership of shares held by his spouse individually except to the extent of his pecuniary interest therein.

(17)

Includes an aggregate of: (i) 135,187 shares of common stock subject to stock options that are currently exercisable or are exercisable within 60 days of June 6, 2025; and (ii) 137,704 shares that may be issuable pursuant to restricted stock units or pursuant to common stock equivalent units under the Deferred Compensation Plan. An aggregate of 111,569 shares are pledged as security for indebtedness.

​

Delinquent Section 16(a) Reports

We are not aware of any failure to comply with the filing requirements of Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, by any of our directors, executive officers or 10% shareholders during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024, except for the late filing by Mr. Carlson of a Form 4 with respect to one transaction.

50

TABLE OF CONTENTS​

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Other than the compensation arrangements with directors and executive officers described above and the ordinary course banking relationships described below, there has not been, since January 1, 2024, and there is not currently proposed, any transaction to which we have been a party in which the amount involved exceeded or will exceed $120,000, and in which any of our directors, executive officers or beneficial holders of more than five percent of our capital stock, or their immediate family members or entities affiliated with them, had or will have a direct or indirect material interest.

Our directors, officers, beneficial owners of more than five percent of our voting securities and their associates were customers of and had transactions with us in the past, and additional transactions with these persons are expected to take place in the future. All outstanding loans and commitments to loan with these persons were made in the ordinary course of business, were made on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable loans with persons not related to the Company or the Bank and did not involve more than the normal risk of collectability or present other unfavorable features. All such loans are approved by the Bank’s board of directors in accordance with the bank regulatory requirements. Similarly, all certificates of deposit and depository relationships with these persons were made in the ordinary course of business and involved substantially the same terms, including interest rates, as those prevailing at the time for comparable depository relationships with persons not related to the Company or the Bank.

Policies and Procedures Regarding Related Party Transactions

Transactions by the Company or the Bank with related parties are subject to certain regulatory requirements and restrictions, including Sections 23A and 23B of the Federal Reserve Act (which govern certain transactions by the Bank with its affiliates) and the Federal Reserve’s Regulation O (which governs certain loans by the Bank to its executive officers, directors and principal shareholders).

Under applicable SEC and Nasdaq Stock Market rules, related party transactions are transactions in which we are a participant, the amount involved exceeds $120,000 and a related party has or will have a direct or indirect material interest. Related parties of the Company include directors (including nominees for election as directors), executive officers, five percent shareholders and the immediate family members of these persons. Our Corporate Counsel, in consultation with management and outside counsel, as appropriate, will review potential related party transactions to determine if they qualify as related party transactions, as defined under SEC rules. If so, as required by the Audit Committee’s charter, the transaction will be referred to Audit Committee for approval. In determining whether to approve a related party transaction, the Audit Committee will consider, among other factors, the fairness of the proposed transaction, the direct or indirect nature of the related party’s interest in the transaction, the appearance of an improper conflict of interests for any director or executive officer taking into account the size of the transaction and the financial position of the related party, whether the transaction would impair an outside director’s independence, the acceptability of the transaction to our regulators and the potential violations of other corporate policies. The Company’s policies and procedures for the review, approval or ratification of related party transactions are set forth in the Audit Committee’s charter.

51

TABLE OF CONTENTS​

AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT

The following is the report of the Audit Committee with respect to the Company’s audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2024. The information contained in this report shall not be deemed to be “soliciting material” or to otherwise be considered “filed” with the SEC, and such information shall not be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates this report by reference in such filing.

The Audit Committee assists the board in carrying out its oversight responsibilities for our financial reporting process, audit process and internal controls. The Audit Committee also reviews the audited financial statements and recommends to the board that they be included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K. The committee is currently comprised of Messrs. Carlson, McDaniel, McDonnell and Ramos. All of the members have been determined to be “independent,” as defined by the rules of the Nasdaq Stock Market.

The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed our audited financial statements for 2024 with our management and Crowe LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm, with respect to the 2024 fiscal year. The committee has also discussed with Crowe LLP the matters required to be discussed by the applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (the “PCAOB”) and the SEC and received and discussed the written disclosures and the letter from Crowe LLP required by the applicable requirements of the PCAOB. Based on the review and discussions with management and Crowe LLP, the Audit Committee has recommended to the board that the audited financial statements for 2024 be included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for filing with the SEC.

Audit Committee:

​ Gerald. C. Carlson (Chair)
Jerry L. McDaniel ​ ​ Jeffrey M. McDonnell
Richard T. Ramos ​

52

TABLE OF CONTENTS​

PROPOSAL 3 — ADVISORY (NON-BINDING) VOTE ON FREQUENCY OF
SHAREHOLDER VOTES ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

We are required under applicable law to permit a separate shareholder vote on the frequency with which shareholders shall conduct an advisory say-on-pay vote on executive compensation, such as Proposal 2 above. In accordance with these requirements, we are providing shareholders with an advisory vote on the frequency with which our shareholders will vote on a say-on-pay proposal.

The advisory vote on the frequency of say-on-pay votes is a non-binding vote as to how often say-on-pay votes should occur: every year, every two years, or every three years. In addition to those choices, shareholders may also abstain from voting. We are required to hold an advisory vote on the frequency of say-on-pay votes at least once every six years.

After careful consideration, our board of directors recommends that future shareholder say-on-pay votes be conducted every year. The board values and encourages constructive input from our shareholders regarding the Company’s compensation philosophy, policies and practices, and believes it is important that such policies and practices are aligned with the best interests of our shareholders. An annual say-on-pay vote will provide the board and Compensation Committee with useful information on shareholder sentiment about these important matters on the most frequent and consistent basis.

Although the board recommends a say-on-pay vote every year, shareholders are not voting to approve or disapprove the board’s recommendation. Rather, shareholders are being asked to vote on the following resolution:

“RESOLVED, that the shareholders of Midland States Bancorp, Inc. determine, on an advisory basis, that the frequency with which the shareholders should have an advisory vote on the compensation of the named executive officers set forth in the Company’s proxy statement for its annual meeting of shareholders, beginning with the 2026 annual meeting of shareholders, shall be (i) every year, (ii) every two years, or (iii) every three years.”

The choice that receives the highest number of votes will be deemed the choice of the shareholders, and the text of the shareholder resolution will be revised accordingly.

While this advisory vote is required, it is not binding on our board of directors and may not be construed as overruling any decision by the board. However, the board of directors will take into account the outcome of the vote when determining the frequency of future say-on-pay votes.

The board of directors recommends a vote for the “EVERY YEAR” frequency. Proxies properly signed and returned will be voted for the “EVERY YEAR” frequency unless shareholders specify otherwise. Shareholders are not voting to approve or disapprove the board of directors’ recommendation. Shareholders may choose among the three choices included in the resolution above, or may abstain for voting on this proposal.

53

TABLE OF CONTENTS​​​​

PROPOSAL 4 — RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF CROWE LLP AS OUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

General

Shareholders are being asked to ratify the appointment of Crowe LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2025. If the appointment of Crowe LLP is not ratified, the matter of the appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm will be considered by the Audit Committee. Representatives of Crowe LLP are not expected to be present at the meeting to make a statement or to respond to appropriate questions. The board of directors unanimously recommends that you vote “FOR” the ratification of the appointment of Crowe LLP to serve as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2025.

Accountant Fees

For the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, the Company incurred the following fees for professional services performed by Crowe LLP:

​

​

​

2024

​

​

2023

​

Audit Fees(1)

​

​

​

$

1,736,300

​

​

​

​

$

898,688

​

​

Audit-Related Fees(2)

​

​

​

​

15,000

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

Tax Fees(3)

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

​

​

8,662

​

​

All Other Fees

​

​

​

​

5,198

​

​

​

​

​

—

​

​

​

(1)

Audit fees include fees for professional services performed by Crowe LLP for (i) the audit of the Company’s consolidated financial statements, (ii) the review of the interim condensed consolidated financial statements included in quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, (iii) the services that are normally provided by the principal accountant in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements; and (iv) other services that generally only the principal accountant can provide. These services included fees for certain HUD audits.

​

(2)

Audit-related fees include fees billed for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of the Company’s consolidated financial statements and are not reported under “Audit Fees.”

​

(3)

Tax fees include fees for the preparation of the tax return for the Captive Insurance Company.

​

(4)

Fees related to Banking as a Service regulatory and compliance training.

​

The Audit Committee, after consideration of these matters, does not believe that the rendering of these services by Crowe LLP is incompatible with maintaining their independence as our principal accountants.

Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policy

Among other things, the Audit Committee is responsible for appointing, setting compensation for and overseeing the work of the independent registered public accounting firm. We have adopted a pre-approval policy under which the Audit Committee approves in advance all audit and non-audit services to be performed by our independent registered public accounting firm. As part of its pre-approval policy, the Audit Committee considers whether the provision of any proposed non-audit services is consistent with the SEC’s rules on auditor independence. In accordance with the pre-approval policy, the Audit Committee has pre-approved certain specified audit and non-audit services to be provided by Crowe LLP for up to twelve months from the date of the pre-approval. All of the services referred to above for 2023 and 2024 were pre-approved by the Audit Committee.

54

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Using a black ink pen, mark your votes with an X as shown in this example. Please do not write outside the designated areas. Your vote matters – here’s how to vote!You may vote online or by phone instead of mailing this card.Votes submitted electronically must be received by August 1, 2025 at11:59 p.m. local time.OnlineGo to www.envisionreports.com/MSBI or scan the QR code — login details are located in the shaded bar below.PhoneCall toll free 1-800-652-VOTE (8683) within the USA, US territories and CanadaSave paper, time and money! Sign up for electronic delivery at www.envisionreports.com/MSBI IF VOTING BY MAIL, SIGN, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.1.To elect the three nominees named in the accompanying proxy statement to serve as Class III directors, each for a term expiring at the 2028 annual meeting of shareholders.ForAgainst Abstain01 - R. Dean Bingham 02 - Jerry L. McDaniel 03 - Jeffrey M. McDonnell2.To approve, on a non-binding, advisory basis, the compensation of certain executive officers, which we refer to as the “say-on- pay proposal.” ForAgainst Abstain4. To ratify the appointment of Crowe LLP as our independentregistered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2025; and ForAgainst Abstain 3.To approve, on a non-binding, advisory basis, the frequency with which shareholders will vote on future say-on-pay proposals, which we refer to as the “say- on-frequency proposal.” 1 YR2 YRS 3 YRS Abstain 5. To transact such other business as may properly be brought before the meeting and any adjournments or postponements of the meeting. Please sign exactly as name(s) appears hereon. Joint owners should each sign. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, corporate officer, trustee, guardian, or custodian, please give full title.Date (mm/dd/yyyy) — Please print date below.Signature 1 — Please keep signature within the box.Signature 2 — Please keep signature within the box. MMMMMMM C 1234567890J N T3 4 B M6 5 4 9 8 0 MR A SAMPLE (THIS AREA IS SET UP TO ACCOMMODATE 140 CHARACTERS) MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND 045Q5A 2025 Annual Meeting Admission Ticket2025 Annual Meeting of Midland States Bancorp, Inc. ShareholdersMonday, August 4, 2025, 5:30 p.m. CT Holiday Inn1301 Avenue of Mid-America Effingham, Illinois 62401Upon arrival, please present this admission ticket and photo identification at the registration desk.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Important notice regarding the Internet availability of proxy materials for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders.The material is available at: www.envisionreports.com/MSBI IF VOTING BY MAIL, SIGN, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.Notice of 2025 Annual Meeting of ShareholdersProxy Solicited by Board of Directors for Annual Meeting — August 4, 2025Jeffrey G. Ludwig and Jeffrey S. Mefford, or either of them, each with the power of substitution, are hereby authorized to represent and vote the shares of the undersigned, with all the powers which the undersigned would possess if personally present, at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Midland States Bancorp, Inc. to be held on August 4, 2025 or at any postponement or adjournment thereof.Shares represented by this proxy will be voted as directed by the shareholder. If no such directions are indicated, the Proxies will have authority to vote FOR the election of each director and FOR Proposals 2, 4 and 1 YEAR on Proposal 3.In their discretion, the Proxies are authorized to vote (1) upon such other business as may properly come before the meeting and (2) for the election of any person as a director if any nominee named herein becomes unable or unwilling to stand for election or serve as a director.(Items to be voted appear on reverse side)Change of Address — Please print new address below.Comments — Please print your comments below.

DEF 14A 0001466026 false 0001466026 2024-01-01 2024-12-31 0001466026 2023-01-01 2023-12-31 0001466026 2022-01-01 2022-12-31 0001466026 2021-01-01 2021-12-31 0001466026 2020-01-01 2020-12-31 0001466026 1 2024-01-01 2024-12-31 0001466026 ecd:AggtChngPnsnValInSummryCompstnTblForAplblYrMember ecd:PeoMember 2024-01-01 2024-12-31 0001466026 ecd:AggtChngPnsnValInSummryCompstnTblForAplblYrMember ecd:NonPeoNeoMember 2024-01-01 2024-12-31 0001466026 ecd:AggtPnsnAdjsSvcCstMember ecd:PeoMember 2024-01-01 2024-12-31 0001466026 ecd:AggtPnsnAdjsSvcCstMember ecd:NonPeoNeoMember 2024-01-01 2024-12-31 0001466026 ecd:PnsnAdjsPrrSvcCstMember ecd:PeoMember 2024-01-01 2024-12-31 0001466026 ecd:PnsnAdjsPrrSvcCstMember ecd:NonPeoNeoMember 2024-01-01 2024-12-31 0001466026 msbi:NetAdjustmentsForPensionMember ecd:PeoMember 2024-01-01 2024-12-31 0001466026 msbi:NetAdjustmentsForPensionMember ecd:NonPeoNeoMember 2024-01-01 2024-12-31 0001466026 ecd:EqtyAwrdsInSummryCompstnTblForAplblYrMember ecd:PeoMember 2024-01-01 2024-12-31 0001466026 ecd:EqtyAwrdsInSummryCompstnTblForAplblYrMember ecd:NonPeoNeoMember 2024-01-01 2024-12-31 0001466026 ecd:YrEndFrValOfEqtyAwrdsGrntdInCvrdYrOutsdngAndUnvstdMember ecd:PeoMember 2024-01-01 2024-12-31 0001466026 ecd:YrEndFrValOfEqtyAwrdsGrntdInCvrdYrOutsdngAndUnvstdMember ecd:NonPeoNeoMember 2024-01-01 2024-12-31 0001466026 ecd:ChngInFrValOfOutsdngAndUnvstdEqtyAwrdsGrntdInPrrYrsMember ecd:PeoMember 2024-01-01 2024-12-31 0001466026 ecd:ChngInFrValOfOutsdngAndUnvstdEqtyAwrdsGrntdInPrrYrsMember ecd:NonPeoNeoMember 2024-01-01 2024-12-31 0001466026 ecd:VstngDtFrValOfEqtyAwrdsGrntdAndVstdInCvrdYrMember ecd:PeoMember 2024-01-01 2024-12-31 0001466026 ecd:VstngDtFrValOfEqtyAwrdsGrntdAndVstdInCvrdYrMember ecd:NonPeoNeoMember 2024-01-01 2024-12-31 0001466026 ecd:ChngInFrValAsOfVstngDtOfPrrYrEqtyAwrdsVstdInCvrdYrMember ecd:PeoMember 2024-01-01 2024-12-31 0001466026 ecd:ChngInFrValAsOfVstngDtOfPrrYrEqtyAwrdsVstdInCvrdYrMember ecd:NonPeoNeoMember 2024-01-01 2024-12-31 0001466026 msbi:AdjustmentsForEquityAwardsForfeituresDuringCurrentYearEqualToPriorYearEndFairValueMember ecd:PeoMember 2024-01-01 2024-12-31 0001466026 msbi:AdjustmentsForEquityAwardsForfeituresDuringCurrentYearEqualToPriorYearEndFairValueMember ecd:NonPeoNeoMember 2024-01-01 2024-12-31 0001466026 ecd:DvddsOrOthrErngsPdOnEqtyAwrdsNtOthrwsRflctdInTtlCompForCvrdYrMember ecd:PeoMember 2024-01-01 2024-12-31 0001466026 ecd:DvddsOrOthrErngsPdOnEqtyAwrdsNtOthrwsRflctdInTtlCompForCvrdYrMember ecd:NonPeoNeoMember 2024-01-01 2024-12-31 0001466026 ecd:EqtyAwrdsAdjsMember ecd:PeoMember 2024-01-01 2024-12-31 0001466026 ecd:EqtyAwrdsAdjsMember ecd:NonPeoNeoMember 2024-01-01 2024-12-31 0001466026 2 2024-01-01 2024-12-31 0001466026 3 2024-01-01 2024-12-31 iso4217:USD iso4217:USD xbrli:shares

FAQ

What is the size of Foghorn Therapeutics' new Watertown facility?

The lease covers 72,846 square feet at 99 Coolidge Avenue, Watertown, MA.

When does the new lease for FHTX begin and when is rent first due?

The lease commences 16 July 2025; base rent starts about 9.5 months after delivery, targeted for 1 October 2026.

How much will Foghorn pay in base rent during the first three years?

Year 1: $3.9 m; Year 2: ≈$5.2 m; Year 3: ≈$6.3 m, followed by 3 % annual increases.

What happened to the existing Cambridge lease at 500 Technology Square?

Foghorn signed a Lease Termination Agreement ending the Cambridge lease early; the company must pay all amounts due through the agreed termination date.

Does Foghorn have options to extend the new Watertown lease?

Yes, the company holds two successive 5-year extension options, exercisable 12–18 months before expiration.

What percentage of operating and tax expenses will Foghorn bear at the new site?

Foghorn's pro-rata share is estimated at ≈22.71 % of the building’s annual operating and tax expenses.