[10-K] NioCorp Developments Ltd. Files Annual Report
NioCorp Developments Ltd. is a development-stage mineral company focused on advancing the Elk Creek Project and has not yet generated revenue. The company reported a net loss per share of $0.36 for the year ended June 30, 2025 (vs. $0.31 prior year) and disclosed that it does not have sufficient cash to fund planned operations and mine construction for the next twelve months, creating substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. The company completed a July 2025 offering (Maxim as placement agent) with net proceeds to be used for working capital and advancing Elk Creek construction, and it reported potential access to up to $46,917 in net proceeds under the Yorkville Equity Facility through April 1, 2026. The filing discloses material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting, a history of losses, significant funding requirements, numerous outstanding warrants and options that could dilute shareholders, and no impairment recorded on mineral properties as of June 30, 2025.
NioCorp Developments Ltd. es una empresa minera en fase de desarrollo centrada en avanzar el Proyecto Elk Creek y aún no ha generado ingresos. La empresa reportó una pérdida neta por acción de $0.36 para el año terminado el 30 de junio de 2025 (frente a $0.31 del año anterior) y comunicó que no cuenta con efectivo suficiente para financiar las operaciones planificadas y la construcción de la mina durante los próximos doce meses, lo que crea dudas sustantivas sobre su capacidad para continuar como negocio en marcha. La empresa completó una oferta en julio de 2025 (Maxim como agente de colocación) con ingresos netos para uso en capital de trabajo y para avanzar en la construcción de Elk Creek, y reportó un posible acceso de hasta $46,917 en ingresos netos bajo la Yorkville Equity Facility hasta el 1 de abril de 2026. La presentación revela debilidades materiales en el control interno sobre la información financiera, un historial de pérdidas, importantes requerimientos de financiamiento, numerosos warrants y opciones en circulación que podrían diluir a los accionistas, y no se registró deterioro en las propiedades mineras al 30 de junio de 2025.
NioCorp Developments Ltd. es una empresa minera en etapa de desarrollo enfocada en avanzar el Proyecto Elk Creek y aún no ha generado ingresos. La compañía reportó una pérdida neta por acción de $0.36 para el año terminado el 30 de junio de 2025 (frente a $0.31 del año anterior) y divulgó que no cuenta con efectivo suficiente para financiar las operaciones planificadas y la construcción de la mina durante los próximos doce meses, lo que provoca dudas sustanciales sobre su capacidad para continuar como empresa en funcionamiento. La compañía completó una oferta en julio de 2025 (Maxim como agente de colocación) con ingresos netos para usar en capital de trabajo y para avanzar en la construcción de Elk Creek, e informó que podría acceder a hasta $46,917 de ingresos netos bajo la Yorkville Equity Facility hasta el 1 de abril de 2026. La presentación revela debilidades materiales en el control interno sobre la información financiera, un historial de pérdidas, requisitos significativos de financiamiento, numerosos warrants y opciones en circulación que podrían diluir a los accionistas, y no se registró deterioro en las propiedades minerales al 30 de junio de 2025.
NioCorp Developments Ltd.은 Elk Creek 프로젝트를 추진하는 개발 단계의 광물 기업이며 아직 수익을 창출하지 못했습니다. 회사는 2025년 6월 30일 종료 연도에 주당 순손실 $0.36를 기록했으며(전년 동기 $0.31 대비), 현금이 충분하지 않다고 공시했고 향후 12개월 동안 계획된 운영과 광산 건설을 자금 조달하기에 충분하지 않아 지속기업יד의 상당한 의문을 제기합니다. 회사는 2025년 7월에 자금공급자 맥심(Maxim)을 통한 공모를 완료했고 순현금은 운전자본 및 Elk Creek 건설 진행에 사용될 예정이며, 2026년 4월 1일까지 Yorkville Equity Facility를 통해 순현금으로 최대 $46,917까지 접근이 가능하다고 밝혔습니다. 공시는 재무보고 내부통제의 중대 약점, 손실의 연혁, 상당한 자금조달 필요성, 주주를 희석할 수 있는 다수의 워런트와 옵션의 남아 있음, 2025년 6월 30일 기준 광물자원에 대한 손상 인식이 없음을 포함합니다.
NioCorp Developments Ltd. est une société minière en phase de développement axée sur l’avancement du projet Elk Creek et n’a pas encore généré de revenus. La société a enregistré une perte nette par action de $0.36 pour l’exercice clos le 30 juin 2025 (contre $0.31 l’exercice précédent) et a déclaré qu’elle ne dispose pas de suffisamment de liquidités pour financer les opérations planifiées et la construction de la mine au cours des douze prochains mois, créant un doute important sur sa capacité à poursuivre en tant qu’entreprise en activité. L’entreprise a mené une offre en juillet 2025 (Maxim comme agent de placement) dont les produits nets seront utilisés pour le fonds de roulement et l’avancement de la construction Elk Creek, et elle a indiqué avoir potentiellement accès à jusqu’à $46,917 de produits nets dans le cadre de la Yorkville Equity Facility jusqu’au 1er avril 2026. Le dépôt révèle des faiblesses matérielles dans le contrôle interne sur les informations financières, un historique de pertes, des besoins de financement importants, de nombreux bons de souscription et options en circulation pouvant diluer les actionnaires, et aucun impairment enregistré sur les propriétés minières au 30 juin 2025.
NioCorp Developments Ltd. ist ein Mineralienunternehmen in der Entwicklungsphase, das darauf fokussiert ist, das Elk Creek-Projekt voranzubringen, und hat noch keine Einnahmen erzielt. Das Unternehmen meldete einen Nettogewinn je Aktie von $0.36 für das am 30. Juni 2025 endende Jahr (gegenüber $0.31 im Vorjahr) und gab bekannt, dass es nicht über ausreichende Liquidität verfügt, um die geplanten Operationen und den Minenbau in den nächsten zwölf Monaten zu finanzieren, was erheblichen Zweifel an der Fortführung des Unternehmens als going concern weckt. Das Unternehmen schloss im Juli 2025 eine Emission ab (Maxim als Platzierungsagent) mit Nettogewinnen, die für Working Capital und den Bau von Elk Creek verwendet werden sollen, und meldete potenziellen Zugang zu bis zu $46,917 Nettoprovisionen im Rahmen der Yorkville Equity Facility bis zum 1. April 2026. Die Einreichung weist materielle Schwächen im internen Kontrollsystem über die Finanzberichterstattung auf, eine Verlustgeschichte, erhebliche Finanzierungsbedarfe, zahlreiche ausstehende Warrants und Optionen, die die Aktionäre verwässern könnten, und zum 30. Juni 2025 keinerlei Abschreibung auf Mineralienwerte.
شركة NioCorp Developments Ltd. هي شركة معدنية في طور التطوير تركز على التقدم في مشروع Elk Creek ولم تولد إيرادات بعد. أبلغت الشركة عن خسارة صافية للسهم قدرها $0.36 للسنة المنتهية في 30 يونيو 2025 (مقابل $0.31 في السنة السابقة) وأعلنت أنها لا تمتلك سيولة كافية لتمويل العمليات المخطط لها وبناء المنجم خلال الاثني عشر شهراً القادمة، مما يخلق شكوكاً جوهرية حول قدرتها على الاستمرار كمرجع قائم. أكملت الشركة عرضاً في يوليو 2025 (مع Maxim كوكيل لعملية التوزيع) بإيرادات صافية ستستخدم لدعم رأس المال العامل وتقدم Elk Creek، وذكرت إمكانية الوصول إلى ما يصل إلى $46,917 من الإيرادات الصافية بموجب Yorkville Equity Facility حتى 1 أبريل 2026. يكشف الملف عن عيوب جوهرية في الرقابة الداخلية على التقارير المالية، وتاريخ من الخسائر، ومتطلبات تمويل كبيرة، وعدد كبير من الضمانات والخيارات القائمة التي قد تُقلّل من قيمة المساهمين، وعدم وجود انخفاض في قيمة الممتلكات المعدنية حتى 30 يونيو 2025.
NioCorp Developments Ltd. 是一家处于开发阶段的矿业公司，专注于推进 Elk Creek 项目，尚未产生收入。公司在截至2025年6月30日的年度里每股净亏损为 $0.36（去年同期为 $0.31），并披露< b>现金不足，无法在未来十二个月内为计划的运营和矿山建设提供资金，因此出现了< b>关于其继续作为持续经营实体能力的重大怀疑。公司在2025年7月完成了一次发行（Maxim 为配售代理），净收益将用于营运资金和 Elk Creek 的建设推进，并报告在 Yorkville Equity Facility 下到2026年4月1日可能获得最高达 $46,917 的净收益。该文件披露在财务报告内部控制方面存在< b>重大弱点，有长期亏损史、重大融资需求、众多尚未到期的认股权证和期权可能会稀释股东，并且截至2025年6月30日未对矿产资产进行减值。
- July 2025 offering completed with placement agent Maxim and proceeds earmarked for working capital and advancing Elk Creek construction
- Up to $46,917 in net proceeds may be available under the Yorkville Equity Facility through April 1, 2026
- No impairment recorded to mineral properties or long-lived assets as of June 30, 2025
- Clear disclosure of risks, capital needs, and remediation plans for internal control weaknesses
- Substantial doubt about ability to continue as a going concern due to insufficient cash for next twelve months
- No revenue as a development-stage issuer and a continuing history of losses
- Material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting, including insufficient experienced accounting personnel
- Significant dilution risk from numerous outstanding warrants, convertible instruments, and options
- Heavy dependence on external financing with no guaranteed future funding commitments beyond the Yorkville facility
Insights
TL;DR: Development-stage miner faces near-term liquidity pressure and dilution risks; project funding is incomplete.
The company remains a development-stage issuer with no revenue and reported a loss per share of $0.36. Management states it lacks sufficient cash to fund planned mine construction for the next twelve months, and access to financing relies on the Yorkville facility ($46,917 available) and recent July 2025 offering proceeds. Outstanding warrants and convertible instruments represent potential dilution. From an investor-impact perspective, the combination of going-concern uncertainty, ongoing negative earnings, and significant financing needs is material.
TL;DR: Material weaknesses in controls create increased risk of financial-reporting errors and raise governance concerns.
The filing identifies material weaknesses in internal control, including insufficient experienced personnel, lack of formal risk-assessment processes, and weak monitoring of third-party specialists and valuation inputs. Management outlines remediation plans such as outside consultants and training, but these weaknesses are significant because they affect the reliability of financial statements and the company’s ability to manage complex financing and valuation processes.
NioCorp Developments Ltd. es una empresa minera en fase de desarrollo centrada en avanzar el Proyecto Elk Creek y aún no ha generado ingresos. La empresa reportó una pérdida neta por acción de $0.36 para el año terminado el 30 de junio de 2025 (frente a $0.31 del año anterior) y comunicó que no cuenta con efectivo suficiente para financiar las operaciones planificadas y la construcción de la mina durante los próximos doce meses, lo que crea dudas sustantivas sobre su capacidad para continuar como negocio en marcha. La empresa completó una oferta en julio de 2025 (Maxim como agente de colocación) con ingresos netos para uso en capital de trabajo y para avanzar en la construcción de Elk Creek, y reportó un posible acceso de hasta $46,917 en ingresos netos bajo la Yorkville Equity Facility hasta el 1 de abril de 2026. La presentación revela debilidades materiales en el control interno sobre la información financiera, un historial de pérdidas, importantes requerimientos de financiamiento, numerosos warrants y opciones en circulación que podrían diluir a los accionistas, y no se registró deterioro en las propiedades mineras al 30 de junio de 2025.
NioCorp Developments Ltd. es una empresa minera en etapa de desarrollo enfocada en avanzar el Proyecto Elk Creek y aún no ha generado ingresos. La compañía reportó una pérdida neta por acción de $0.36 para el año terminado el 30 de junio de 2025 (frente a $0.31 del año anterior) y divulgó que no cuenta con efectivo suficiente para financiar las operaciones planificadas y la construcción de la mina durante los próximos doce meses, lo que provoca dudas sustanciales sobre su capacidad para continuar como empresa en funcionamiento. La compañía completó una oferta en julio de 2025 (Maxim como agente de colocación) con ingresos netos para usar en capital de trabajo y para avanzar en la construcción de Elk Creek, e informó que podría acceder a hasta $46,917 de ingresos netos bajo la Yorkville Equity Facility hasta el 1 de abril de 2026. La presentación revela debilidades materiales en el control interno sobre la información financiera, un historial de pérdidas, requisitos significativos de financiamiento, numerosos warrants y opciones en circulación que podrían diluir a los accionistas, y no se registró deterioro en las propiedades minerales al 30 de junio de 2025.
NioCorp Developments Ltd.은 Elk Creek 프로젝트를 추진하는 개발 단계의 광물 기업이며 아직 수익을 창출하지 못했습니다. 회사는 2025년 6월 30일 종료 연도에 주당 순손실 $0.36를 기록했으며(전년 동기 $0.31 대비), 현금이 충분하지 않다고 공시했고 향후 12개월 동안 계획된 운영과 광산 건설을 자금 조달하기에 충분하지 않아 지속기업יד의 상당한 의문을 제기합니다. 회사는 2025년 7월에 자금공급자 맥심(Maxim)을 통한 공모를 완료했고 순현금은 운전자본 및 Elk Creek 건설 진행에 사용될 예정이며, 2026년 4월 1일까지 Yorkville Equity Facility를 통해 순현금으로 최대 $46,917까지 접근이 가능하다고 밝혔습니다. 공시는 재무보고 내부통제의 중대 약점, 손실의 연혁, 상당한 자금조달 필요성, 주주를 희석할 수 있는 다수의 워런트와 옵션의 남아 있음, 2025년 6월 30일 기준 광물자원에 대한 손상 인식이 없음을 포함합니다.
NioCorp Developments Ltd. est une société minière en phase de développement axée sur l’avancement du projet Elk Creek et n’a pas encore généré de revenus. La société a enregistré une perte nette par action de $0.36 pour l’exercice clos le 30 juin 2025 (contre $0.31 l’exercice précédent) et a déclaré qu’elle ne dispose pas de suffisamment de liquidités pour financer les opérations planifiées et la construction de la mine au cours des douze prochains mois, créant un doute important sur sa capacité à poursuivre en tant qu’entreprise en activité. L’entreprise a mené une offre en juillet 2025 (Maxim comme agent de placement) dont les produits nets seront utilisés pour le fonds de roulement et l’avancement de la construction Elk Creek, et elle a indiqué avoir potentiellement accès à jusqu’à $46,917 de produits nets dans le cadre de la Yorkville Equity Facility jusqu’au 1er avril 2026. Le dépôt révèle des faiblesses matérielles dans le contrôle interne sur les informations financières, un historique de pertes, des besoins de financement importants, de nombreux bons de souscription et options en circulation pouvant diluer les actionnaires, et aucun impairment enregistré sur les propriétés minières au 30 juin 2025.
NioCorp Developments Ltd. ist ein Mineralienunternehmen in der Entwicklungsphase, das darauf fokussiert ist, das Elk Creek-Projekt voranzubringen, und hat noch keine Einnahmen erzielt. Das Unternehmen meldete einen Nettogewinn je Aktie von $0.36 für das am 30. Juni 2025 endende Jahr (gegenüber $0.31 im Vorjahr) und gab bekannt, dass es nicht über ausreichende Liquidität verfügt, um die geplanten Operationen und den Minenbau in den nächsten zwölf Monaten zu finanzieren, was erheblichen Zweifel an der Fortführung des Unternehmens als going concern weckt. Das Unternehmen schloss im Juli 2025 eine Emission ab (Maxim als Platzierungsagent) mit Nettogewinnen, die für Working Capital und den Bau von Elk Creek verwendet werden sollen, und meldete potenziellen Zugang zu bis zu $46,917 Nettoprovisionen im Rahmen der Yorkville Equity Facility bis zum 1. April 2026. Die Einreichung weist materielle Schwächen im internen Kontrollsystem über die Finanzberichterstattung auf, eine Verlustgeschichte, erhebliche Finanzierungsbedarfe, zahlreiche ausstehende Warrants und Optionen, die die Aktionäre verwässern könnten, und zum 30. Juni 2025 keinerlei Abschreibung auf Mineralienwerte.
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D. C. 20549
FORM
(Mark One)
| ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 | |
| For
the fiscal year ended | |
| OR | |
| TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 | |
For the transition period from to
| Commission
file number: |
 |
||
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
| (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) | ||
(Address of principal executive offices) |
(Zip Code) | ||
| Registrant’s
telephone number, including area code: | |||
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
| Title of each class | Trading Symbol(s) | Name of each exchange on which registered |
Common Shares |
Securities registered pursuant to section 12(g) of the Act: None.
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
Yes
☐
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.
Yes
☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files).
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
| Large Accelerated Filer | ☐ | Accelerated Filer | ☐ |
| ☒ | Smaller Reporting Company | ||
| Emerging Growth Company |
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ☐
If
securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the
registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements.
Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the registrant’s executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D-1(b). ☐
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No
At December 31, 2024, the aggregate market value of the registrant’s voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the registrant was $ million based on the closing sale price as reported on the Nasdaq Stock Market. There were common shares outstanding on September 11, 2025.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Not applicable.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Table of Contents
| Select Mining Definitions | i |
| Metric Equivalents | v |
| Mineral Reserves and Resources | v |
| Currency and Exchange Rates | vi |
| Risk Factors Summary | vi |
| PART I | 1 |
| ITEM 1. BUSINESS | 1 |
| Introduction | 1 |
| Business Operations | 1 |
| Corporate Structure | 1 |
| Historical Development of the Business | 2 |
| Recent Corporate Events | 3 |
| Competitive Business Conditions | 4 |
| Cycles | 4 |
| Economic Dependence | 4 |
| Government Regulation | 5 |
| Human Capital | 7 |
| Forward-Looking Statements | 7 |
| Available Information | 9 |
| ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS | 9 |
| Risks Related to Our Business | 9 |
| Risks Related to Mining and Development | 15 |
| Risks Related to Government Regulation | 19 |
| Risks Related to Our Debt | 21 |
| Risks Related to the Common Shares | 21 |
| ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS | 24 |
| ITEM 1C. CYBERSECURITY | 24 |
| ITEM 2. PROPERTIES | 25 |
| ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS | 42 |
| ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES | 42 |
| PART II | 43 |
| ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS, AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES | 43 |
| Market Information | 43 |
| Holders | 43 |
| Dividends | 43 |
| Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans | 43 |
| Purchases of Equity Securities by the Company | 43 |
| Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities | 43 |
| Exchange Controls | 43 |
| Certain Canadian Federal Income Tax Considerations for U.S. Residents | 43 |
| ITEM 6. RESERVED | 45 |
| ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS | 45 |
| Summary of Consolidated Financial and Operating Performance | 45 |
| Results of Operations | 45 |
| Liquidity and Capital Resources | 47 |
| Cash Flow Considerations | 50 |
| Environmental | 51 |
| Forward-Looking Statements | 51 |
| Accounting Developments | 51 |
| Critical Accounting Estimates and Recent Accounting Pronouncements | 51 |
| Other | 52 |
| ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK | 52 |
| Interest rate risk | 52 |
| Foreign currency exchange risk | 53 |
| Commodity price risk | 53 |
| ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA | 53 |
| ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE. | 85 |
| ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES | 85 |
| ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION | 87 |
| ITEM 9C. DISCLOSURE REGARDING FOREIGN JURISDICTIONS THAT PREVENT INSPECTION | 87 |
| PART III | 88 |
| ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE | 88 |
| ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION | 92 |
| ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS | 98 |
| ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE | 102 |
| ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES | 104 |
| PART IV | 105 |
| ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES | 105 |
| ITEM 16. FORM 10–K SUMMARY | 109 |
| SIGNATURES | 110 |
Select Mining Definitions
| carbonatite | A type of intrusive or extrusive igneous rock defined by mineralogic composition consisting of greater than 50% carbonate minerals. |
| cut-off grade | The grade (i.e., the concentration of metal or mineral in rock) that determines the destination of the material during mining. For purposes of establishing “prospects of economic extraction,” the cut-off grade is the grade that distinguishes material deemed to have no economic value (it will not be mined in underground mining or if mined in surface mining, its destination will be the waste dump) from material deemed to have economic value (its ultimate destination during mining will be a processing facility). Other terms used in similar fashion as cut-off grade include net smelter return, pay limit, and break-even stripping ratio. |
| deposit | A mineralized body which has been physically delineated by sufficient drilling, trenching, and/or underground work, and found to contain a sufficient average grade of metal or metals to warrant further exploration and/or development expenditures. Such a deposit does not qualify as a commercially mineable ore body or as containing reserves or ore, unless final legal, technical, and economic factors are resolved. |
| development stage issuer | An issuer that is engaged in the preparation of mineral reserves for extraction on at least one material property |
| development stage property | A property that has mineral reserves disclosed, pursuant to Regulation S-K 1300, but no material extraction |
| diamond drilling | A type of rotary drilling in which diamond bits are used as the rock-cutting tool to produce a recoverable drill core sample of rock for observation and analysis |
| dysprosium or Dy | The element dysprosium (atomic number 66), a rare-earth element in the lanthanide series. |
| dysprosium oxide | The chemical compound composed of dysprosium and oxygen with the formula Dy2O3 |
| economically viable | When used in the context of mineral reserve determination, means that the qualified person has determined, using a discounted cash flow analysis, or has otherwise analytically determined, that extraction of the mineral reserve is economically viable under reasonable investment and market assumptions |
| feasibility study | A comprehensive technical and economic study of the selected development option for a mineral project, which includes detailed assessments of all applicable modifying factors, as defined under S-K 1300, together with any other relevant operational factors, and detailed financial analysis that are necessary to demonstrate, at the time of reporting, that extraction is economically viable. The results of the study may serve as the basis for a final decision by a proponent or financial institution to proceed with, or finance, the development of the project.
(1) A feasibility study is more comprehensive, and with a higher degree of accuracy, than a pre-feasibility study. It must contain mining, infrastructure, and process designs completed with sufficient rigor to serve as the basis for an investment decision or to support project financing.
(2) The confidence level in the results of a feasibility study is higher than the confidence level in the results of a pre-feasibility study. Terms such as full, final, comprehensive, bankable, or definitive feasibility study are equivalent to feasibility study. |
i
| ferroniobium or FeNb | An iron-niobium alloy, with a niobium content of 60-70% |
| indicated mineral resource | That part of a mineral resource for which quantity and grade or quality are estimated on the basis of adequate geological evidence and sampling. The level of geological certainty associated with an indicated mineral resource is sufficient to allow a qualified person to apply modifying factors in sufficient detail to support mine planning and evaluation of the economic viability of the deposit. Because an indicated mineral resource has a lower level of confidence than the level of confidence of a measured mineral resource, an indicated mineral resource may only be converted to a probable mineral reserve. |
| inferred mineral resource | That part of a mineral resource for which quantity and grade or quality are estimated on the basis of limited geological evidence and sampling. The level of geological uncertainty associated with an inferred mineral resource is too high to apply relevant technical and economic factors likely to influence the prospects of economic extraction in a manner useful for evaluation of economic viability. Because an inferred mineral resource has the lowest level of geological confidence of all mineral resources, which prevents the application of the modifying factors in a manner useful for evaluation of economic viability, an inferred mineral resource may not be considered when assessing the economic viability of a mining project, and may not be converted to a mineral reserve. |
| LoM | Life of Mine, the period from the beginning of construction to the end of mine life |
| measured mineral resource | That part of a mineral resource for which quantity and grade or quality are estimated on the basis of conclusive geological evidence and sampling. The level of geological certainty associated with a measured mineral resource is sufficient to allow a qualified person to apply modifying factors, as defined in this section, in sufficient detail to support detailed mine planning and final evaluation of the economic viability of the deposit. Because a measured mineral resource has a higher level of confidence than the level of confidence of either an indicated mineral resource or an inferred mineral resource, a measured mineral resource may be converted to a proven mineral reserve or to a probable mineral reserve. |
| mineral reserve | An estimate of tonnage and grade or quality of indicated and measured mineral resources that, in the opinion of the qualified person, can be the basis of an economically viable project. More specifically, it is the economically mineable part of a measured or indicated mineral resource, which includes diluting materials and allowances for losses that may occur when the material is mined or extracted. |
| mineral resource | A concentration or occurrence of material of economic interest in or on the Earth’s crust in such form, grade or quality, and quantity that there are reasonable prospects for economic extraction. A mineral resource is a reasonable estimate of mineralization, taking into account relevant factors such as cut-off grade, likely mining dimensions, location or continuity, that, with the assumed and justifiable technical and economic conditions, is likely to, in whole or in part, become economically extractable. It is not merely an inventory of all mineralization drilled or sampled. |
| modifying factors | The factors that a qualified person must apply to indicated and measured mineral resources and then evaluate in order to establish the economic viability of mineral reserves. A qualified person must apply and evaluate modifying factors to convert measured and indicated mineral resources to proven and probable mineral reserves. These factors include, but are not restricted to: mining; processing; metallurgical; infrastructure; economic; marketing; legal; environmental compliance; plans, negotiations, or agreements with local individuals or groups; and governmental factors. |
ii
| The number, type and specific characteristics of the modifying factors applied will necessarily be a function of and depend upon the mineral, mine, property, or project. | |
| niobium or Nb | The element niobium (atomic number 41), a transition metal primarily used in the production of high-strength, low-alloy steel |
| Nb2O5 | Niobium pentoxide, a commercial form of refined niobium |
| neodymium oxide | The chemical compound composed of neodymium and oxygen with the formula Nd2O3 |
| NSR | Net Smelter Return, the net revenue that the owner of a mining property receives from the sale of the mine’s products less transportation and refining costs |
| praseodymium oxide | The chemical compound composed of praseodymium and oxygen with the formula Pr2O3 |
| probable mineral reserve | The economically mineable part of an indicated and, in some cases, a measured mineral resource |
| production stage property | A property with material extraction of mineral reserves |
| proven mineral reserve | The economically mineable part of a measured mineral resource and can only result from conversion of a measured mineral resource |
| qualified person | An individual who is:
(1) A mineral industry professional with at least five years of relevant experience in the type of mineralization and type of deposit under consideration and in the specific type of activity that person is undertaking on behalf of the registrant; and
(2) An eligible member or licensee in good standing of a recognized professional organization at the time the technical report is prepared. For an organization to be a recognized professional organization, it must:
(i) Be either:
(A) An organization recognized within the mining industry as a reputable professional association; or
(B) A board authorized by Unites States federal, state, or foreign statute to regulate professionals in the mining, geoscience, or related field;
(ii) Admit eligible members primarily on the basis of their academic qualifications and experience;
(iii) Establish and require compliance with professional standards of competence and ethics;
(iv) Require or encourage continuing professional development;
(v) Have and apply disciplinary powers, including the power to suspend or expel a member regardless of where the member practices or resides; and
(vi) Provide a public list of members in good standing.
|
| rare earth elements, rare earths or REEs | A group of 15 elements referred to as the lanthanide series in the periodic table of elements. Scandium and yttrium, while not true REEs, are also included in this categorization because they exhibit similar properties to the lanthanides and are found in the same ore bodies. Individual mineral deposits may not contain all REEs in economically recoverable quantities. |
iii
| rare earth products | Commercial rare earth products currently being examined for production by the Company, including neodymium-praseodymium oxide (sometimes referred to as didymium oxide), dysprosium oxide, and terbium oxide. These are the primary rare earths compounds used to manufacture the world’s most powerful permanent magnets. |
| relevant experience | For purposes of determining whether a party is a qualified person, that the party has experience in the specific type of activity that the person is undertaking on behalf of the registrant. If the qualified person is preparing or supervising the preparation of a technical report concerning exploration results, the relevant experience must be in exploration. If the qualified person is estimating, or supervising the estimation of mineral resources, the relevant experience must be in the estimation, assessment and evaluation of mineral resources and associated technical and economic factors likely to influence the prospect of economic extraction. If the qualified person is estimating, or supervising the estimation of mineral reserves, the relevant experience must be in engineering and other disciplines required for the estimation, assessment, evaluation, and economic extraction of mineral reserves.
(1) Relevant experience also means, for purposes of determining whether a party is a qualified person, that the party has experience evaluating the specific type of mineral deposit under consideration (e.g., coal, metal, base metal, industrial mineral, or mineral brine). The type of experience necessary to qualify as relevant is a facts and circumstances determination. For example, experience in a high-nugget, vein-type mineralization such as tin or tungsten would likely be relevant experience for estimating mineral resources for vein-gold mineralization, whereas experience in a low grade disseminated gold deposit likely would not be relevant.
Note 1 to Paragraph (1) of the Definition of Relevant Experience: It is not always necessary for a person to have five years’ experience in each and every type of deposit in order to be an eligible qualified person if that person has relevant experience in similar deposit types. For example, a person with 20 years’ experience in estimating mineral resources for a variety of metalliferous hard-rock deposit types may not require as much as five years of specific experience in porphyry-copper deposits to act as a qualified person. Relevant experience in the other deposit types could count towards the experience in relation to porphyry-copper deposits.
(2) For a qualified person providing a technical report for exploration results or mineral resource estimates, relevant experience also requires, in addition to experience in the type of mineralization, sufficient experience with the sampling and analytical techniques, as well as extraction and processing techniques, relevant to the mineral deposit under consideration. Sufficient experience means that level of experience necessary to be able to identify, with substantial confidence, problems that could affect the reliability of data and issues associated with processing.
(3) For a qualified person applying the modifying factors, as defined by this section, to convert mineral resources to mineral reserves, relevant experience also requires:
(i) Sufficient knowledge and experience in the application of these factors to the mineral deposit under consideration; and
(ii) Experience with the geology, geostatistics, mining, extraction, and processing that is applicable to the type of mineral and mining under consideration.
|
| S-K 1300 | Subpart 1300 of Regulation S-K promulgated by the SEC |
| S-K 1300 Elk Creek Technical Report Summary | A technical report summary for the Elk Creek Project that conforms to S-K 1300 reporting standards, with an effective date of June 30, 2022, originally filed as Exhibit |
iv
| 96.1 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2022, and incorporated by reference into this Annual Report on Form 10-K | |
| scandium or Sc | The element scandium (atomic number 21), a transition metal used as an alloying agent with aluminum that provides high strength and lower weight for aerospace industry components and other applications that need lightweight metals. It also is used in the electrolyte layer of solid oxide fuel cells. |
| Sc2O3 | Scandium trioxide, the primary form of refined scandium |
| terbium oxide | The chemical compound composed of terbium and oxygen with the formula Tb2O3 |
| titanium or Ti | The element titanium (atomic number 22), a transition metal which in its oxide form is a common pigment in paper, paint, and plastic. In its metallic form, titanium is used in aerospace applications, armor, chemical processing applications, marine hardware applications, medical implants, power generation, and in sporting goods. |
| TiO2 | Titanium dioxide, a commercial form of refined titanium |
Metric Equivalents
For ease of reference, the following factors for converting Imperial measurements into metric equivalents are provided:
To convert from Imperial |
To metric |
Multiply by |
| Feet (“ft”) | Meters (“m”) | 0.3048 |
| Miles | Kilometers (“km”) | 1.6093 |
| Tons | Tonnes (“t”) | 0.9072 |
| 1 mile = 1.6093 kilometers |
| 2,204.62 pounds = 1 metric tonne = 1 tonne |
| 2000 pounds (1 short ton) = 0.9072 tonnes |
Mineral Reserves and Resources
Information concerning our mining property in this Annual Report on Form 10-K has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of S-K 1300, which first became applicable to us for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2022. All mineral resource and mineral reserve estimates included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K have been prepared in accordance with S-K 1300. Previously, we prepared our estimates of mineral resources and mineral reserves following only National Instrument 43-101 of the Canadian Securities Administrators entitled “Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects” (“NI 43-101”) and the Canadian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (“CIM”) “Definition Standards – For Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves, May 10, 2014.” The CIM-compliant NI 43-101 technical report (the “NI 43-101 Elk Creek Technical Report”) for the Company’s niobium, scandium, and titanium project (the “Elk Creek Project”) and S-K 1300 Elk Creek Technical Report Summary, filed as Exhibit 96.1 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2022, and incorporated by reference into this Annual Report on Form 10-K, are based on a feasibility study prepared by qualified persons (the “2022 Elk Creek Feasibility Study”) and are substantively identical to one another except for internal references to the regulations under which the report is made, and certain organizational differences. In addition, S-K 1300 requires us to disclose our mineral resources, in addition to our mineral reserves, as of the end of our most recently completed fiscal year. You are cautioned that mineral resources are subject to further exploration and development and are subject to additional risks and no assurance can be given that they will eventually convert to future reserves. Inferred resources, in particular, have a great amount of uncertainty as to their existence and their economic and legal feasibility. Investors are cautioned not to assume that any part or all of the inferred resource exists or is economically or legally mineable. See Item 1A., Risk Factors.
v
Currency and Exchange Rates
All dollar amounts in this Annual Report on Form 10-K are expressed in United States (“U.S.”) dollars unless otherwise indicated. The Company’s accounts are maintained in U.S. dollars and the Company’s consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”). Some of the Company’s significant agreements, as well as certain vendors, use Canadian dollars. As used herein, “C$” represents Canadian dollars.
The following table sets forth the rate of exchange for the Canadian dollar, expressed in U.S. dollars in effect at the end of the periods indicated, the average of exchange rates in effect during such periods, and the high and low exchange rates during such periods based on the daily rate of exchange as reported by the Bank of Canada for conversion of Canadian dollars into U.S. dollars.
Fiscal Year Ended June 30, | ||
2025 |
2024 | |
| Canadian Dollars to U.S. Dollars | ||
| Rate at end of period | 0.7330 | 0.7306 |
| Average rate for period | 0.7170 | 0.7380 |
| High for period | 0.7429 | 0.7617 |
| Low for period | 0.6848 | 0.7207 |
Risk Factors Summary
Investing in common shares, no par value, of the Company (“Common Shares”) involves numerous risks and uncertainties, as more fully described below. You should read these risks before you invest in our Common Shares. In particular, risks associated with our business include, but are not limited to, the following:
Risks Related to Our Business
| ● | Our ability to operate as a going concern is in doubt. |
| ● | We will require significant additional capital to fund our business plan. |
| ● | We have a limited operating history on which to base an evaluation of our business and prospects. |
| ● | We have a history of losses and expect to continue to incur losses in the future. |
| ● | We may not recognize the full value of the Yorkville Equity Facility Financing Agreement (as defined herein) and may not receive any proceeds from the exercise our outstanding Common Share purchase warrants (“Warrants”), and the potential adverse effect on the prevailing market prices for our Common Shares as a result of sales, or the perception of future sales, of Common Shares could adversely affect our ability to raise additional capital. |
| ● | The Company has identified material weaknesses in its internal control over financial reporting. If not remediated, the Company’s failure to establish and maintain effective disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting could result in material misstatements in its financial statements and a failure to meet its reporting and financial obligations, each of which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition and the trading price of the Common Shares. |
Risks Related to Mining and Development
| ● | We face numerous uncertainties in estimating our mineral reserves and resources and inaccuracies in our estimates could result in lower than expected revenues, higher than expected costs and decreased profitability. |
| ● | The nature of mineral exploration and production activities involves a high degree of risk and the possibility of uninsured losses. |
| ● | We have no history of producing commercial products from our current mining properties and there can be no assurance that we will successfully establish mining operations or profitably produce minerals. |
vi
| ● | Any material changes in mineral resource/reserve estimates and grades of mineralization will affect the economic viability of placing a property into production and a property’s return on capital. |
| ● | Our properties and operations may be subject to litigation or other claims. |
| ● | We do not currently insure against all the risks and hazards of mineral exploration, development, and mining operations. |
Risks Related to Government Regulation
| ● | We may not be able to obtain or renew all required permits and licenses to place any of our properties into production. |
| ● | We are subject to significant governmental regulations that affect our operations and costs of conducting our business. |
| ● | Land reclamation requirements for our properties may be burdensome and expensive. |
Risks Related to Our Debt
| ● | The level of our indebtedness from time to time could impair our ability to obtain additional financing. |
Risks Related to the Common Shares
| ● | Future sales, or the perception of future sales, of Common Shares by existing shareholders or by us, or future dilutive issuances of Common Shares by us, could adversely affect prevailing market prices for the Common Shares and cause investors to suffer dilution in their net book value per Common Share. |
| ● | We are subject to the continued listing criteria of The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC (“Nasdaq”) and our failure to satisfy these criteria may result in delisting of the Common Shares. |
vii
PART I
| ITEM 1. | BUSINESS |
Introduction
NioCorp Developments Ltd. (“NioCorp,” “we,” “us,” “our,” or the “Company”) was incorporated under the laws of the Province of British Columbia under the Business Corporations Act (British Columbia) on February 27, 1987, under the name “IPC International Prospector Corp.” On May 22, 1991, we changed our name to “Kingston Resources Ltd.” On June 29, 2001, we changed our name to “Butler Developments Corp.” On February 12, 2009, we changed our name to “Butler Resource Corp.” On March 4, 2010, we changed our name to “Quantum Rare Earth Developments Corp.” On March 4, 2013, we changed our name to “NioCorp Developments Ltd.”
NioCorp is a United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) reporting company, and we are also a Canadian reporting issuer in British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Ontario, and New Brunswick. Our registered and records office is located at 1133 Melville Street, Suite 3500, Vancouver, British Columbia V6E 4E5 (ATTN: Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP). Our principal executive office is located at 7000 South Yosemite Street, Suite 115, Centennial, Colorado 80112.
Business Operations
NioCorp, through ECRC (as defined below), is developing a critical minerals project that, if and when developed, will produce niobium, scandium, titanium, and potentially, rare earth products. Known as the “Elk Creek Project,” it is located near Elk Creek, Nebraska, in the southeast portion of the state.
| ● | Niobium is used to produce various superalloys that are extensively used in high performance aircraft and jet turbines. It also is used in high-strength, low-alloy steel, a stronger steel used in automobiles, bridges, structural systems, buildings, pipelines, and other applications that generally enables those applications to be stronger and lighter in mass. This “lightweighting” benefit often results in environmental benefits, including reduced fuel consumption and material usage, which can result in fewer air emissions. |
| ● | Scandium can be combined with aluminum to make super-high-performance alloys with increased strength and improved corrosion resistance. Scandium also is a critical component of advanced solid oxide fuel cells, an environmentally preferred technology for high-reliability, distributed electricity generation. |
| ● | Titanium is a component of various superalloys and other applications that are used for aerospace applications, weapons systems, protective armor, medical implants and many others. It also is used in pigments for paper, paint, and plastics. |
| ● | Rare earth elements are critical minerals that are needed in virtually all U.S. defense systems and across the electronics, manufacturing, high-technology, transportation, and energy sectors. Magnetic rare earths, such as neodymium, praseodymium, terbium, and dysprosium are critical to the making of neodymium-iron-boron magnets, which are used across a wide variety of defense and civilian applications. |
Our primary business strategy is to advance our Elk Creek Project to commercial production. Based on the success of our recent fund-raising activities, as discussed below under Part II, Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Liquidity and Capital Resources,” we are focused on carrying out our near-term planned work programs associated with securing the project financing necessary to complete detailed design, development, and construction of the Elk Creek Project, as well as the commencement of early elements of project construction.
Corporate Structure
The Company’s business operations are conducted primarily through ECRC. The table below provides an overview of the Company’s current subsidiaries and their activities:
1
Name |
State/Province
of |
Ownership |
Business |
| 0896800 B.C. Ltd. (“0896800”) | British Columbia | 100% |
The only business of 0896800 is to hold the shares of Class A common stock of ECRC |
| Elk Creek Resources Corp. (“ECRC”) | Delaware | 80.42%(1) | The business of ECRC is the development of the Elk Creek Project |
| NioCorp Technologies Limited | United Kingdom | 100% |
The business of NioCorp Technologies Limited is the research and development of aluminum-scandium alloys and other business opportunities |
| (1) | Represents 100% of Class A common stock owned by 0896800, and 3,934,031 Vested Shares and 3,391,596 Earnout Shares (each as defined below) held by third parties, and outstanding as of June 30, 2025. |
Historical Development of the Business
The acquisition of the carbonatite property located in Southeast Nebraska, USA (the “Elk Creek Property”) was closed in December 2010 and involved the purchase by NioCorp of all of the issued and outstanding common shares of a private British Columbia company, which in turn held 100% of the issued and outstanding shares of Elk Creek Resources Corp., a Nebraska corporation.
Between 2011 and 2020, the Company advanced the Elk Creek Project through the completion of field exploration programs, feasibility study development and reporting, updates to underground mine designs and supporting infrastructure, and the receipt of required permits from the State of Nebraska.
During fiscal year 2021, we obtained funding which allowed us to purchase land and mineral rights at the Elk Creek Property and continue early project execution activities. During fiscal year 2022, we focused efforts towards refining our Elk Creek Project mineral resource and mineral reserve estimates with respect to REEs. This work included additional assays of historical drill core to fill data gaps in the existing resource database and re-modeling. Based on this re-interpretation of the geologic data, an update to the mine plan was also completed. Based on this work, we issued the 2022 NI 43-101 Elk Creek Technical Report on June 28, 2022, and filed the S-K 1300 Elk Creek Technical Report Summary as an exhibit to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2022.
On March 17, 2023 (the “Closing Date”), the Company closed a series of transactions (the “GXII Transaction”), pursuant to the Business Combination Agreement, dated September 25, 2022 (the “Business Combination Agreement”), among the Company, GX Acquisition Corp. II (“GXII”), and Big Red Merger Sub Ltd (the “Closing”). At the Closing, the Company also closed convertible debt financings (the “Yorkville Convertible Debt Financing”) with YA II PN, Ltd., an investment fund managed by Yorkville Advisors Global, LP (together with YA II PN, Ltd., “Yorkville”), and the standby equity purchase facility with Yorkville (the “Yorkville Equity Facility Financing” and, together with the Yorkville Convertible Debt Financing, the “Yorkville Financings”) became effective. The transactions contemplated by or related to the Business Combination Agreement, including the GXII Transaction, the Yorkville Financings, and a 10-for-1 reverse stock split consummated in connection with the Closing, are referred to, collectively, as the “2023 Transactions.”
As a result of the 2023 Transactions, among other matters, GXII became and indirect, majority-owned subsidiary of NioCorp and changed its name to “Elk Creek Resources Corp.”, which we refer to as “ECRC,” and the Common Shares and the Warrants that were assumed by NioCorp from GXII (the “NioCorp Assumed Warrants”) were listed for trading on Nasdaq under the symbols “NB” and “NIOBW,” respectively.
Pursuant to the Business Combination Agreement, the Sponsor Support Agreement, dated September 25, 2022, among GX Sponsor II LLC (the “Sponsor”), GXII, the Company and the other persons party thereto, and the Exchange Agreement, dated as of March 17, 2023, by and among NioCorp, ECRC and the Sponsor (the “Exchange Agreement”), after the Closing, the shares of Class B common stock of ECRC are exchangeable into Common Shares on a one-for-one basis, subject to certain equitable adjustments, under certain conditions. Of the issued and outstanding shares of Class B common stock of ECRC, 4,565,808 shares (the “Vested Shares”) were vested as of the Closing Date and are exchangeable at any time, and from time to time, until the tenth anniversary of the Closing Date and 3,391,596 shares (the “Earnout Shares”) are exchangeable until the tenth anniversary of the Closing Date, subject
2
to certain vesting conditions. See Note 9 to the consolidated financial statements included in Part II, Item 8 hereof for additional information regarding the Class B common stock of ECRC.
During fiscal year 2025, the Company initiated a drilling program at the Elk Creek Project to support the conversion of a portion of its current indicated resources into measured resources and the subsequent conversion of a portion of its current probable mineral reserves into proven mineral reserves. This drilling program is ongoing as of the date of this report. When completed, the results of the drilling program, along with other technical and economic analyses undertaken by the Company, will be used to update the feasibility study for the Elk Creek Project.
Recent Corporate Events
EXIM Bank Financing Process
As previously disclosed, on March 6, 2023, the Company announced the receipt of a Letter of Interest from the Export-Import Bank of the United States (“EXIM”) for potential debt financing through EXIM’s “Make More In America” initiative to fund a portion of the project costs of the Elk Creek Project (the “EXIM Financing”).
NioCorp submitted a formal application to EXIM for a loan under EXIM’s “Make More in America” initiative on June 6, 2023. The Company was informed that its application received approval by the first of three reviews by the EXIM Transaction Review Committee on October 2, 2023. EXIM deployed additional resources to the processing of the Company’s application during the quarter ended December 31, 2023, and has retained financial and legal consultants to support EXIM’s due diligence on the Elk Creek Project. On April 15, 2024, the Company received a Preliminary Project Letter (the “PPL”) from EXIM. The PPL is a summary of EXIM’s initial due diligence findings and also includes a preliminary Indicative Term Sheet. The PPL identified additional project activities to be undertaken by the Company in conjunction with the EXIM evaluation process. These include an updated mine plan and updated Elk Creek Project capital costs on a final or close-to-final basis reflecting updated process flows.
Management is working with EXIM to continue to advance the project through the next stages of EXIM’s due diligence and loan application process. We are currently unable to estimate how long the application process, including the additional project activities identified in the PPL, may take, and there can be no assurances that we will be able to successfully negotiate a final commitment of debt financing from EXIM.
April 2025 Offering
On April 21, 2025, the Company closed an underwritten, registered public offering (the “April 2025 Offering”), pursuant to the underwriting agreement, dated April 17, 2025, with Maxim Group LLC (“Maxim”), as underwriter, pursuant to which the Company issued and sold (i) 6,628,846 Common Shares at a public offering price of $2.60 per Common Share and (ii) 1,063,462 pre-funded Warrants (the “April 2025 Pre-Funded Warrants”) to purchase up to an additional 1,063,462 Common Shares at a public offering price of $2.5999. The April 2025 Pre-Funded Warrants have an exercise price of $0.0001 per underlying Common Share, are exercisable immediately, and do not have an expiration date. On April 17, 2025, Maxim partially exercised its over-allotment option to purchase 323,504 additional Common Shares at the closing. The net proceeds from the April 2025 Offering were approximately $18.7 million, after deducting underwriting discounts and offering expenses.
July 2025 Offering
On July 18, 2025, the Company closed a registered public offering (the “July 2025 Offering”), pursuant to a placement agency agreement, dated July 17, 2025 (the “Placement Agency Agreement”) with Maxim, as sole placement agent, pursuant to which the Company issued and sold 13,850,000 Common Shares at a public offering price of $3.25 per Common Share. The net proceeds from the July 2025 Offering were approximately $41.2 million, after deducting underwriting discounts and offering expenses.
DoD Agreement
On August 4, 2025, ECRC entered into a Project Sub-Agreement (the “DoD Agreement”) with Advanced Technology International (“ATI”), an entity acting on behalf of the Defense Industrial Base Consortium under the authority of the U.S. Department of Defense (“DoD”). Subject to the terms and conditions of the DoD Agreement,
3
ECRC is entitled to receive up to an aggregate of approximately $10.0 million of reimbursement payments from the DoD upon the achievement of certain project milestones related to feasibility study-level engineering and additional reserve drilling, as well as preparing updated cost estimates, for the Elk Creek Project.
Competitive Business Conditions
There is significant competition within the minerals industry to discover, acquire and obtain project financing for mineral properties considered to have commercial potential. We compete with others in efforts to obtain project financing and resources to advance the Elk Creek Project to construction and commercial operation, acquire and utilize mining and processing equipment, and hire qualified personnel. These other companies may be better capitalized than us and we may have difficulty in obtaining the financing and resources necessary to advance the Elk Creek Project to construction and commercial operation. In addition, in competing for qualified personnel, we may be required to pay compensation or benefits relatively higher than those paid in the past, and the availability of qualified personnel may be limited in high-demand periods.
Cycles
The mining business is subject to mineral price cycles. The marketability of minerals and mineral concentrates is also affected by worldwide economic cycles. Demand has in the past, and may in the future, be subject to those same worldwide economic cycles. Fluctuations in supply and demand in various regions throughout the world are common. In addition, the niobium, scandium, titanium, and potentially, rare earth products, that we intend to produce at the Elk Creek Project are subject to additional commodity-specific price cycles resulting from, among other factors, demand for specific products, export controls, taxes and other tariffs and fees.
The following table sets forth commodity prices for the last five calendar years for the ferroniobium, scandium trioxide, and titanium dioxide products the Company anticipates extracting from its Elk Creek Project. These pricing surveys may not be representative of the pricing that the Company anticipates achieving for its products if commercial production begins from its Elk Creek Project.
Year |
Ferroniobium |
Sc2O3 |
TiO2 |
| 2024 | $46 | $1,200 | $1.31 |
| 2023 | 51 | -(4) | 1.46 |
| 2022 | 46 | 2,100 | 1.47 |
| 2021 | 44 | 2,200 | 1.30 |
| 2020 | 37 | 3,800 | 1.17 |
| (1) | Source: Argus Metal Prices, average annual ending price, 2024. Ferroniobium 65% niobium content, FOB U.S. warehouse. |
| (2) | Source: United States Geological Service (“USGS”) Mineral Commodity Summary, 2024. Sc2O3, 99.99% purity, 5-kilogram (“kg”) lot size. |
| (3) | Source: USGS Mineral Commodity Summary, 2024. Rutile mineral concentrate, bulk, minimum 95% TiO2, f.o.b. Australia. |
| (4) | Pricing information was not provided by the USGS for 2023. |
As NioCorp is a development stage issuer and has not yet generated any revenue from the operation of the Elk Creek Project, it is not currently significantly affected by changes in commodity demand and prices, except to the extent that these changes may impact the development of the Elk Creek Project. As it does not carry on production activities, NioCorp’s ability to fund ongoing exploration is affected by the availability of financing, which is, in turn, affected by the strength of the economy and other general economic factors.
Economic Dependence
Other than land and mineral right option agreements and agreements between NioCorp and third parties for the purchase and sale of products to be produced from the Elk Creek Project (“offtake agreements”), NioCorp’s business is not substantially dependent on any contract such as a contract to sell the major part of its product or services or to purchase the major part of its requirements for goods, services or its raw materials, or any franchise or license or other agreement to use a patent, formula, trade secret, process or trade name upon which its business depends.
4
Government Regulation
The exploration and development of a mining prospect is subject to regulation by a number of federal and state government authorities. These include the United States Environmental Protection Agency (the “EPA”) and the United States Army Corps of Engineers (the “USACE”) as well as the various state and local environmental protection agencies. The regulations address many environmental issues relating to air, soil, and water contamination, and apply to many mining related activities including exploration, mine construction, mineral extraction, ore milling, water use, waste disposal, and use of toxic substances. In addition, we are subject to regulations relating to labor standards, occupational health and safety, mine safety, general land use, export of minerals, taxation, data protection, and data security. Many of the regulations require permits or licenses to be obtained, the absence of which and/or inability to obtain such permits or licenses will adversely affect our ability to conduct our exploration, development, and operation activities. The failure to comply with the regulations and terms of permits and licenses may result in fines or other penalties or in revocation of a permit or license or loss of a prospect.
General
While none of the lands on which the Elk Creek Project is proposed to be built are owned by the U.S. Government, mining rights on public lands are governed by the General Mining Law of 1872, as amended, which allows for the location of mining claims on certain federal lands upon the discovery of a valuable mineral deposit and compliance with location requirements. The exploration of mining properties and development and operation of mines is governed by both federal and state laws. Federal laws that govern mining claim location and maintenance and mining operations on federal lands are generally administered by the Bureau of Land Management. Additional federal laws, governing mine safety and health, also apply. State laws also require various permits and approvals before exploration, development or production operations can begin. Among other things, a reclamation plan must typically be prepared and approved, with financial assurance provided in the amount of projected reclamation costs. The financial assurance is used to ensure that proper reclamation takes place and will not be released until that time. Local jurisdictions may also impose permitting requirements, such as conditional use permits or zoning approvals.
Environmental Regulation
Our mineral projects are subject to various federal, state, and local laws and regulations governing protection of the environment. These laws are continually changing and, in general, are becoming more restrictive. The development, operation, closure, and reclamation of mining projects in the U.S. requires numerous notifications, permits, authorizations, and public agency decisions. Compliance with environmental and related laws and regulations requires us to obtain permits issued by regulatory agencies and to file various reports and keep records of our operations. Certain of these permits require periodic renewal or review of their conditions and may be subject to a public review process during which opposition to our proposed operations may be encountered. We are currently operating under various permits for activities connected to mineral exploration, reclamation, and environmental considerations. Our policy is to conduct business in a way that safeguards public health and the environment. We believe that our operations are conducted in material compliance with applicable laws and regulations.
Changes to current local, state, or federal laws and regulations in the jurisdictions where we operate could require additional capital expenditures and increased operating and/or reclamation costs. Although we are unable to predict what additional legislation, if any, might be proposed or enacted, additional regulatory requirements could impact the economics of our projects.
Environmental Regulation - U.S. Federal Laws
The Comprehensive Environmental, Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (“CERCLA”), and comparable state statutes, impose strict, joint, and several liability on current and former owners and operators of sites and on persons who disposed of or arranged for the disposal of hazardous substances found at such sites. It is not uncommon for the government to file claims requiring clean-up actions and/or demands for reimbursement for government-incurred clean-up costs or natural resource damages. It is also not uncommon for neighboring landowners and other third parties to file claims for personal injury and property damage allegedly caused by hazardous substances released into the environment. The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (“RCRA”), and comparable state statutes, govern the disposal of solid waste and hazardous waste and authorize the imposition of substantial fines and penalties for noncompliance, as well as requirements for corrective actions. CERCLA, RCRA, and comparable state statutes can impose liability for clean-up of sites and disposal of substances found on exploration, mining and processing sites long after activities on such sites have been completed.
5
The Clean Air Act, as amended (“CAA”), restricts the emission of air pollutants from many sources, including mining and processing activities. Any future mining operations by the Company may produce air emissions, including fugitive dust and other air pollutants from stationary equipment, storage facilities, and the use of mobile sources such as trucks and heavy construction equipment, which are subject to review, monitoring and/or control requirements under the CAA and state air quality laws. New facilities may be required to obtain permits before work can begin, and existing facilities may be required to incur capital costs in order to remain in compliance. In addition, permitting rules may impose limitations on our production levels or result in additional capital expenditures in order to comply with the rules.
The National Environmental Policy Act (“NEPA”) requires federal agencies to integrate environmental considerations into their decision-making processes by evaluating the environmental impacts of their proposed actions, including issuance of permits to mining facilities and assessing alternatives to those actions. If a proposed action could significantly affect the environment, the agency must prepare either a detailed statement known as an Environmental Impact Statement (“EIS”), or a less detailed statement known as an Environmental Assessment (“EA”). The EPA, other federal agencies, and any interested third parties can review and comment on the scope of the EIS or EA and the adequacy of any findings set forth in the draft and final EIS or EA. This process can cause delays in issuance of required permits or result in changes to a project to mitigate its potential environmental impacts, which can in turn impact the economic feasibility of a proposed project.
The Clean Water Act (“CWA”), and comparable state statutes, impose restrictions and controls on the discharge of pollutants into waters of the U.S. The discharge of pollutants into regulated waters is prohibited, except in accordance with the terms of a permit issued by the EPA or an analogous state agency. The CWA regulates storm water from mining facilities and requires a storm water discharge permit or Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan for certain activities. Such a permit requires the regulated facility to monitor and sample storm water run-off from its operations. The CWA and regulations implemented thereunder also prohibit discharges of dredged and fill material in wetlands and other waters of the U.S. unless authorized by an appropriately issued permit. The CWA and comparable state statutes provide for civil, criminal, and administrative penalties for unauthorized discharges of pollutants, and impose liability on parties responsible for those discharges for the costs of cleaning up any environmental damage caused by the release and for natural resource damages resulting from the release.
The Safe Drinking Water Act (“SDWA”) and the Underground Injection Control (“UIC”) program promulgated thereunder, regulate the drilling and operation of subsurface injection wells. The EPA directly administers the UIC program in some states and in others the responsibility for the program has been delegated to the state. The program requires that a permit be obtained before drilling a disposal or injection well. Violation of these regulations and/or contamination of groundwater by mining-related activities may result in fines, penalties, and remediation costs, among other sanctions and liabilities under the SDWA and state laws. In addition, third-party claims may be filed by landowners and other parties claiming damages for alternative water supplies, property damages, and bodily injury.
Environmental Regulation − Nebraska
Nebraska has a well-developed set of environmental regulations and responsible agencies but does not have clearly defined regulations with respect to permitting mines. As such, review of the project and the issuance of permits by Nebraska agencies and regulatory bodies could potentially impact the total time to market for our Elk Creek Project. Other Nebraska regulations govern operating and design standards for the construction and operation of any source of air emissions and landfill operations. Any changes to these laws and regulations could have an adverse impact on our financial performance and results of operations by, for example, requiring changes to operating conditions, technical criteria, fees, or surety requirements. The most stringent permit related to air quality is known as a Prevention of Significant Deterioration (“PSD”) permit, which requires the applicant to demonstrate compliance with NAAQS and Best Available Control Technology (“BACT”) for the control of air emissions. If the facility exceeds the potential to emit thresholds for such a permit and is thus subject to PSD requirements, permanent construction at the project site may not begin until the responsible agency issues the PSD permit. For facilities in Nebraska with potential emissions below PSD thresholds, a state air construction permit is needed. The state permit also requires a demonstration of compliance with NAAQS but does not require a BACT demonstration and further allows construction at a subject facility to proceed ahead of permit issuance through an established variance process.
6
Human Capital
The Company’s ability to continue to progress the Elk Creek Project will depend on its ability to attract and retain individuals with (among other skills) financial, administrative, engineering, geological and mining skills, and knowledge of our industry and targeted markets. Much of the necessary specialized skills and knowledge required by the Company as a mineral exploration company are available from the Company’s current management team and Board of Directors (the “Board”). The Company retains outside consultants if additional specialized skills and knowledge are required.
As of June 30, 2025, we had seven full-time employees as well as one contract employee. In addition, we use consultants with specific skills to assist with various aspects of our corporate affairs, project evaluation, due diligence, corporate governance, and property management.
Our compensation programs are designed to align compensation of our employees with the Company’s performance and to provide the proper incentives to attract, retain, and motivate employees to achieve superior results. The structure of our compensation programs balances competitive wages and benefits and incentive earnings for both short-term and long-term performance.
Our priority to maintain a culture of ethical performance as a core value is reflected in the Company’s Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (the “Code of Conduct”) and other related policies. Oversight is provided by the Company’s Board and, for specific areas of performance, by committees of the Board. Employees are required to review the Code of Conduct on a periodic basis. Our compensation programs also include consideration of ethical performance in determining incentive awards.
The Company also provides a robust suite of benefits to our employees, including 401(k) participation, medical-insurance options, and programs to encourage and support the whole person.
Forward-Looking Statements
This Annual Report on Form 10-K and the exhibits attached hereto contain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and “forward-looking information” within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities legislation (collectively, “forward-looking statements”).
Forward-looking statements have been based upon our current business and operating plans, as approved by the Board, and may include statements regarding, among other matters, the financial and business performance of NioCorp; NioCorp’s anticipated results and developments in the operations of NioCorp in future periods; NioCorp’s planned exploration activities; the adequacy of NioCorp’s financial resources; NioCorp’s ability to secure sufficient project financing to complete construction and commence operation of the Elk Creek Project; NioCorp’s ability to receive a final commitment of financing from EXIM; the estimated total upfront capital expenditure for the Elk Creek Project; NioCorp’s expectation and ability to produce niobium, scandium, and titanium and the potential to produce rare earth elements at the Elk Creek Project; NioCorp’s plans to produce and supply specific products and market demand for those products; NioCorp’s ability to access the full amount of the expected net proceeds of the Yorkville Equity Facility Financing Agreement; NioCorp’s expectation that it will receive the full $10 million in reimbursement under the DoD Agreement; the intended use of our cash balance as of June 30, 2025 as well as the proceeds from the July 2025 Offering, the proceeds from Warrant exercise issuances, and the reimbursement payments pursuant to the DoD Agreement; the expected results of the drilling program at the Elk Creek Project; the expectation that the results of the drilling program will be used to update the feasibility study for the Elk Creek Project; the Elk Creek Project’s ability to produce multiple critical metals; the Elk Creek Project’s projected ore production and mining operations over its expected mine life; the completion of technical and economic analyses on the potential addition of magnetic rare earth oxides to NioCorp’s planned product suite; statements with respect to the estimation of mineral resources and mineral reserves; the exercise of options to purchase additional land parcels; the execution of contracts with engineering, procurement and construction companies; NioCorp’s ongoing evaluation of the impact of inflation, supply chain issues, tariffs, and geopolitical unrest on the Elk Creek Project’s economic model; and the creation of full time and contract construction jobs over the construction period of the Elk Creek Project.
7
Forward-looking statements are frequently, but not always, identified by words such as “expects,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “intends,” “estimates,” “potential,” “possible,” and similar expressions, or statements that events, conditions, or results “will,” “may,” “could,” or “should” (or the negative and grammatical variations of any of these terms) occur or be achieved. Any statements that express or involve discussions with respect to predictions, expectations, beliefs, plans, projections, objectives, assumptions, or future events or performance (often, but not always, using words or phrases such as “expects” or “does not expect,” “is expected,” “anticipates” or “does not anticipate,” “plans,” “estimates,” or “intends,” or stating that certain actions, events, or results “may,” “could,” “would,” “might,” or “will” be taken, occur or be achieved) are not statements of historical fact and may be forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements reflect material expectations and assumptions, including, without limitation, expectations and assumptions relating to: NioCorp’s ability to receive sufficient project financing for the construction of the Elk Creek Project on acceptable terms, or at all; the future price of metals; the stability of the financial and capital markets; and current estimates and assumptions regarding the Yorkville Equity Facility Financing Agreement and its benefits. Such forward-looking statements reflect the Company’s current views with respect to future events and are subject to certain known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and assumptions. Many factors could cause actual results, performance, or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance, or achievements that may be expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements, including, among others, risks related to the following: NioCorp’s ability to operate as a going concern; NioCorp’s requirement of significant additional capital; NioCorp’s ability to receive sufficient project financing for the construction of the Elk Creek Project on acceptable terms, or at all; NioCorp’s ability to achieve the required milestones and receive the full $10.0 million in reimbursement under the DoD Agreement; NioCorp’s ability to receive a final commitment of financing from EXIM or other debt financing or financial support on acceptable timelines, on acceptable terms, or at all; NioCorp’s ability to access the full amount of the expected net proceeds under the Yorkville Equity Facility Financing Agreement; NioCorp’s ability to continue to meet Nasdaq listing standards; risks relating to the Common Shares, including price volatility, lack of dividend payments and dilution or the perception of the likelihood of any of the foregoing; the extent to which NioCorp’s level of indebtedness and/or the terms contained in agreements governing NioCorp’s indebtedness, if any, the Yorkville Equity Facility Financing Agreement or other agreements may impair NioCorp’s ability to obtain additional financing, on acceptable terms, or at all; covenants contained in agreements with NioCorp’s secured creditors that may affect its assets; NioCorp’s limited operating history; NioCorp’s history of losses; the material weaknesses in NioCorp’s internal control over financial reporting, NioCorp’s efforts to remediate such material weaknesses and the timing of remediation; the possibility that NioCorp may qualify as a PFIC under the Code; the potential that the 2023 Transactions could result in NioCorp becoming subject to materially adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences as a result of the application of Section 7874 and related sections of the Code; cost increases for NioCorp’s exploration and, if warranted, development projects; a disruption in, or failure of, NioCorp’s information technology systems, including those related to cybersecurity; equipment and supply shortages; variations in the market demand for, and prices of, niobium, scandium, titanium and rare earth products; current and future offtake agreements, joint ventures, and partnerships, including our ability to negotiate extensions to existing agreements or to enter into new agreements, on favorable terms or at all; NioCorp’s ability to attract qualified management; estimates of mineral resources and reserves; mineral exploration and production activities; feasibility study results; the results of metallurgical testing; the results of technological research; changes in demand for and price of commodities (such as fuel and electricity) and currencies; competition in the mining industry; changes or disruptions in the securities markets; legislative, political or economic developments, including changes in federal and/or state laws that may significantly affect the mining industry; trade policies and tensions, including tariffs; inflationary pressures; the impacts of climate change, as well as actions taken or required by governments related to strengthening resilience in the face of potential impacts from climate change; the need to obtain permits and comply with laws and regulations and other regulatory requirements; the timing and reliability of sampling and assay data; the possibility that actual results of work may differ from projections/expectations or may not realize the perceived potential of NioCorp’s projects; risks of accidents, equipment breakdowns, and labor disputes or other unanticipated difficulties or interruptions; the possibility of cost overruns or unanticipated expenses in development programs; operating or technical difficulties in connection with exploration, mining, or development activities; management of the water balance at the Elk Creek Project site; land reclamation requirements related to the Elk Creek Project; the speculative nature of mineral exploration and development, including the risks of diminishing quantities of grades of reserves and resources; claims on the title to NioCorp’s properties; potential future litigation; and NioCorp’s lack of insurance covering all of NioCorp’s operations.
Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary materially from those described herein. This list is not exhaustive of the factors that may affect
8
any of the Company’s forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are statements about the future and are inherently uncertain, and actual achievements of the Company or other future events or conditions may differ materially from those reflected in the forward-looking statements due to a variety of risks, uncertainties, and other factors, including without limitation those discussed under Item 1A., Risk Factors below.
The Company’s forward-looking statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K are based on the beliefs, expectations, and opinions of management as of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The Company does not assume any obligation to update forward-looking statements if circumstances or management’s beliefs, expectations, or opinions should change, except as required by law. For the reasons set forth above, investors should not attribute undue certainty to, or place undue reliance on, forward-looking statements.
Available Information
We maintain a website at http://www.niocorp.com. Our Common Shares are currently registered under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act, and we are currently required to file reports on Forms 10-K, 10-Q, or 8-K. Our Annual Report on Form 10-K (which includes our audited consolidated financial statements), Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and amendments to reports filed or furnished pursuant to Sections 13(a) and 15(d) of the Exchange Act, are available on our website, free of charge, as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such reports with, or furnish those reports to, the SEC. The SEC maintains an internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC (http://www.sec.gov). We do not intend to send security holders a printed version of our Annual Report as it will be available online.
We maintain a Code of Conduct, a copy of which may be found on our website in the “About Us” section under the main title “Corporate Governance.” Our Code of Conduct contains information regarding whistleblower procedures.
We are not including the information contained on or accessible through our website or the SEC’s website as a part of, or incorporating it by reference into, this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
| ITEM 1A. | RISK FACTORS |
Our business activities are subject to significant risks, including those described below. You should carefully consider these risks. If any of the described risks occur, our business, financial position, and results of operations could be materially adversely affected. Such risks are not the only ones we face, and additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial may also affect our business. This report contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking statements as a result of a number of factors, including the risks described below. See “Forward-Looking Statements” under Item 1., “Business.”
Risks Related to Our Business
Our ability to operate as a going concern is in doubt.
The notes that accompany our consolidated financial statements for the year ended June 30, 2025, disclose that substantial doubt exists as to our ability to continue as a going concern. The consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K have been prepared under the assumption that we will continue as a going concern. We are a development stage issuer and we have incurred losses since our inception.
As a development stage issuer, the Company has not yet commenced its mining operations and accordingly does not generate any revenue. The Company does not have sufficient cash on hand to fund planned operations as well as the construction necessary for mine development for the next twelve months. The Company is dependent on its ability to raise capital to fund future exploration and working capital requirements. Our plans for the long-term achievement of and continuation as a going concern include financing our future operations through sales of our Common Shares and/or debt and the potential profitable exploitation of our Elk Creek Project. Additionally, capital markets and general economic conditions in the U.S. and Canada may impose significant obstacles to raising the required funds. As discussed further below, while we have been successful in doing so in the past, there can be no assurance we will be able to raise funds in the future. These factors raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.
9
We will require significant additional capital to fund our business plan.
We will be required to make substantial capital expenditures to advance the Elk Creek Project to construction and commercial operation. We will also require funds for our ongoing capital needs and will be required to raise additional capital.
We expect that the Company will operate at a loss for the foreseeable future. The Company’s current planned cash needs are approximately $40.0 million to $50.0 million for the next twelve months. In addition to outstanding accounts payable and short-term liabilities, our planned expenditures over the next twelve months are expected to consist of expenditures relating to certain advancements of the Elk Creek Project by NioCorp’s majority owned subsidiary, ECRC, corporate overhead costs, and estimated costs related to securing financing necessary for advancement of the Elk Creek Project.
We expect to use our cash balance as of June 30, 2025, as well as the proceeds from the July 2025 Offering, the proceeds from the Warrant exercise issuances, and the reimbursement payments pursuant to the DoD Agreement, to fund our planned expenditures for the next twelve months. However, additional work is required in order to advance the Elk Creek Project, which will require additional financing. The S-K 1300 Elk Creek Technical Report Summary includes an estimated total upfront capital expenditure for the Elk Creek Project of approximately $1,141.0 million. The actual amount of capital expenditure required to successfully achieve commercial production at the Elk Creek Project is subject to, among other factors, the timing and actual cost of further exploration, preparing feasibility studies, permitting, engineering and the construction of infrastructure, mining and processing facilities. If the Company were able to obtain additional funding, the Company would be able to accelerate planned expenditures ahead of its current schedule. In addition, to the extent that EXIM requests further project activities to be undertaken in connection with the diligence process, the Company would require additional funding to complete such activities. The Company’s ability to continue operations and fund our current work plan is dependent on management’s ability to secure additional financing.
Except for the potential funding from advances under the Yorkville Equity Facility Financing Agreement, which is discussed below under Part II, Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Liquidity and Capital Resources,” and the potential exercise of options to purchase Common Shares (“Options”) and Warrants, we currently have no further funding commitments or arrangements for additional financing at this time. In addition, agreements we enter into may contain restrictions on our ability to raise additional financing on reasonable terms or at all. For example, pursuant to the Exchange Agreement, NioCorp is restricted from issuing equity or equity-linked securities (other than Common Shares) or any preferred equity or non-voting equity if such issuance would adversely impact the rights of the holders of the shares of Class B common stock of ECRC, without the consent of the holders of a majority of the shares of Class B common stock of ECRC. Notwithstanding the restrictions set forth in the Exchange Agreement, there is significant uncertainty that we would be able to secure any additional financing in the current equity or debt markets.
Our ability to obtain necessary funding depends upon a number of factors, including the status of the national and worldwide economy and the price of the products we intend to produce. We are actively pursuing additional sources of debt and equity financing, and while we have been successful in doing so in the past, there can be no assurance we will be able to obtain any such additional financing on acceptable terms, if at all.
In addition, the potential EXIM Financing is subject to, among other matters, the satisfactory completion of due diligence, including the additional project activities identified in the PPL, the negotiation and settlement of final terms, and the negotiation of definitive documentation. There can be no assurance that the EXIM Financing will be completed on the terms described herein or at all.
Our inability to access sufficient capital for our operations could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, or prospects. Sales of substantial amounts of securities may have a highly dilutive effect on our ownership or share structure. Sales of a large number of Common Shares in the public markets, or the potential for such sales, could decrease the trading price of the Common Shares and could impair our ability to raise capital through future sales of Common Shares. We have not yet commenced commercial production at any of our properties and, as such, have not generated positive cash flows to date and have no reasonable prospects of doing so unless successful commercial production can be achieved at our Elk Creek Project. We expect to continue to incur
10
negative investing and operating cash flows until such time as we enter into successful commercial production. This will require us to deploy our working capital to fund such negative cash flow and to seek additional sources of financing. There is no assurance that any such financing sources will be available or sufficient to meet our requirements. There is no assurance that we will be able to continue to raise equity capital or to secure additional debt financing, or that we will not continue to incur losses.
We have a limited operating history on which to base an evaluation of our business and prospects.
Since our inception, we have had no revenue from operations. We have no history of producing products from any of our properties. Our Elk Creek Project is a development stage property. Advancing our Elk Creek Project from a development stage property to a production stage property will require significant capital and time, and successful commercial production from the Elk Creek Property will be subject to permitting and construction of the mine, processing plants, roads, and other related works and infrastructure. As a result, we are subject to all of the risks associated with developing and establishing new mining operations and business enterprises including:
| ● | the timing and cost, which can be considerable, of further exploration, preparing feasibility studies, permitting, engineering and construction of infrastructure, mining, and processing facilities; |
| ● | the availability and costs of drilling equipment, exploration personnel, skilled labor, and mining and processing equipment, if required; |
| ● | the availability and cost of appropriate smelting and/or refining arrangements, if required; |
| ● | compliance with environmental and other governmental approval and permit requirements; |
| ● | the availability of funds to finance exploration, development, permitting, and construction activities, as warranted; |
| ● | potential opposition from non-governmental organizations, local groups, or local residents that may delay or prevent development activities; |
| ● | potential increases in exploration, construction, and operating costs due to changes in the cost of fuel, power, materials, and supplies; and |
| ● | potential shortages of mining, mineral processing, hydrometallurgical, pyrometallurgical, construction, and other facilities-related supplies. |
The costs, timing, and complexities of exploration, development, engineering, and construction activities may be increased by the location of our properties and competition from other mineral exploration and mining companies. It is common for exploration companies to experience unexpected problems and delays during development, if commenced, including engineering, procurement, construction, commissioning, and ramp-up. Accordingly, our activities may not result in profitable operations and we may not succeed in establishing operations or profitably producing products at any of our current or future properties, including our Elk Creek Project.
We have a history of losses and expect to continue to incur losses in the future.
We have incurred losses since inception, have negative cash flow from operating activities, and expect to continue to incur losses in the future. We incurred a net loss attributable to the Company of $17.4 million for the year ended June 30, 2025, and $11.4 million for the year ended June 30, 2024.
We expect to continue to incur losses unless and until such time as one of our properties enters into commercial production and generates sufficient revenues to fund continuing operations. We recognize that if we are unable to generate significant revenues from operations and dispositions of our properties, we will not be able to earn profits or continue operations. At this early stage of our operation, we also expect to face the risks, uncertainties, expenses, and difficulties frequently encountered by companies at the start-up stage of their business development. We cannot be sure that we will be successful in addressing these risks and uncertainties and our failure to do so could have a materially adverse effect on our financial condition.
Increased costs could affect our financial condition.
We anticipate that costs at our projects that we may explore or develop, including the Elk Creek Project, will frequently be subject to variation from one year to the next due to a number of factors, such as changing ore grade, metallurgical performance, and revisions to mine plans, if any, in response to the physical shape and location of the ore body. In addition, costs are affected by the price of commodities such as fuel, steel, aluminum, iron, chemicals,
11
natural gas, fresh water, and electricity, as well as by government actions such as tariffs. Such commodities are at times subject to volatile price movements, including increases that could make production at certain operations less profitable or not profitable at all. For example, the S-K 1300 Elk Creek Technical Report Summary includes an estimated total upfront capital expenditure for the Elk Creek Project of approximately $1,141.0 million. The actual amount of capital expenditure required to successfully achieve commercial production at the Elk Creek Project is subject to, among other factors, the timing and actual cost of further exploration, preparing feasibility studies, permitting, engineering and the construction of infrastructure, mining, and processing facilities. A material increase in costs at any significant location could have a significant effect on our profitability.
A disruption in, or failure of our third-party service providers’ IT systems, including those related to cybersecurity, could adversely affect our business operations and financial performance.
We rely on the accuracy, capacity, and security of our third-party service providers’ IT systems for the operations of many of our business processes and to comply with regulatory, legal, and tax requirements. We are dependent on third parties to provide important IT services relating to, among other things, operational technology at our facilities, human resources, electronic communications, and certain finance functions. Despite the security measures that our third-party service providers have implemented, including those related to cybersecurity, we have experienced, and may experience in the future, cybersecurity incidents. Cybersecurity incidents and similar attacks vary in their form and can include the deployment of harmful malware or ransomware, denial-of-service attacks, and other attacks, which may affect business continuity and threaten the availability, confidentiality and integrity of our systems and information, and the systems and information of our third-party service providers. Cybersecurity incidents can also include employee or personnel failures, fraud, phishing or other social engineering attempts or other methods to cause confidential information, payments, account access or access credentials, or other data to be transmitted to an unintended recipient. Cybersecurity threat actors also may attempt to exploit vulnerabilities in software that is commonly used by companies in cloud-based services and bundled software. As previously disclosed, on February 14, 2025, we became aware of unauthorized third-party access to our information systems, including portions of its email systems, that resulted in misdirected vendor payments (the “Cybersecurity Incident”). To date, the Cybersecurity Incident has not had a material impact on our business operations or financial condition.
Though our third-party service providers have controls in place, we cannot provide assurance that a cybersecurity incident will not occur in the future. Furthermore, we may have little or no oversight with respect to security measures employed by third-party service providers, which may ultimately prove to be ineffective at countering threats. Cybersecurity threats or incidents or disruptions of our third-party service providers’ IT systems could interrupt our ability to manage and operate our business, impact data, and adversely affect our business operations and financial performance, including major disruptions to business operations, loss of intellectual property, release of confidential information, alteration or corruption of data or systems, costs related to remediation or the payment of ransom, and litigation including individual claims or consumer class actions, commercial litigation, administrative, and civil or criminal investigations or actions, regulatory intervention and sanctions or fines, investigation and remediation costs and possible prolonged negative publicity. In addition, we have incurred costs in connection with the remediation of the Cybersecurity Incident and we may be required to incur significant costs to protect against and, if required, remediate the damage caused by cybersecurity incidents, disruptions or system failures in the future.
A shortage of equipment and supplies could adversely affect our ability to operate our business.
We are dependent on various supplies and equipment to carry out our mining exploration and, if warranted, project development operations. The shortage of such supplies, equipment, and parts could have a material adverse effect on our ability to carry out our operations and could therefore limit, or increase the cost of, production. Ongoing disruptions to the world’s economy, including issues related to supply chains, inflation, tariffs and trade tensions, and increased raw material and labor costs, may delay our ability to secure supplies and equipment for the Elk Creek Project on a timely basis.
Joint ventures and other partnerships, including offtake arrangements, may expose us to risks.
We have entered into offtake agreements related to our Elk Creek Project as well as agreements related to the supply of natural gas and electricity to the project site, and may enter into joint ventures or partnership arrangements, including additional offtake agreements, with other parties in relation to the exploration, development, and production of certain of the properties in which we have an interest. Any failure of such other companies to meet their obligations
12
to us or to third parties, or any disputes with respect to the parties’ respective rights and obligations, price fluctuations and termination provisions related to such agreements, or our ability to negotiate extensions to existing agreements or to enter into new agreements, on favorable terms or at all, could have a material adverse effect on us, the development and production at our properties, including the Elk Creek Project, the joint ventures, if any, or their properties and therefore could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial performance, cash flows, and the price of our Common Shares.
We may experience difficulty attracting and retaining qualified management to meet the needs of our anticipated growth, and the failure to manage our growth effectively could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition.
We are dependent on a relatively small number of key employees, including our Chief Executive Officer. The loss of any officer could have an adverse effect on us. We have no life insurance on any individual, and we may be unable to hire a suitable replacement for them on favorable terms, should that become necessary.
The effect on the capital markets and the economy of recent global events, including inflation, volatility in commodity prices, supply chain uncertainty, tariffs and trade tensions, and increases in raw material and labor costs, could have an adverse effect on NioCorp’s business plans, financial condition, and liquidity.
Certain events have effected, and continue to effect, the global and United States economies, including increased inflation, volatility in commodity prices, supply chain uncertainty, tariffs and trade tensions, and increases in raw material and labor costs. We cannot predict how this will affect our business, but the impact may be adverse.
Although it is not possible to predict the ultimate impact of these factors on NioCorp’s business plans, financial position, or liquidity, such impacts that may be material include, but are not limited to: (i) delays in the completion of the mine and surface engineering designs and uncertainty regarding our ability to finalize necessary Engineering, Procurement, and Construction (“EPC”) agreements as a result of disruptions in the businesses of our engineering consultants and key contractors for the Elk Creek Project, (ii) reduced availability and increased costs of employees, (iii) a negative impact on our liquidity position, and (iv) increased costs and less ability to access funds in the capital markets. The full extent to which these factors may continue to impact our business will depend on future developments, which continue to be highly uncertain and cannot be predicted at this time.
In addition, we cannot predict the impact that recent global events, including inflation, volatility in commodity prices, supply chain uncertainty, tariffs and trade tensions, and increases in raw material and labor costs will have on our customers, suppliers, vendors, and other business partners, and each of their financial conditions; however, any material effect on these parties could adversely impact us.
It may be difficult to enforce judgments or bring actions outside the U.S. against us and certain of our directors.
We are a Canadian corporation and, as a result, it may be difficult or impossible for an investor to do the following:
| ● | enforce in courts outside the U.S. judgments obtained in U.S. courts based upon the civil liability provisions of U.S. federal securities laws against these persons and the Company; or |
| ● | bring in courts outside the U.S. an original action to enforce liabilities based upon U.S. federal securities laws against these persons and the Company. |
We may not recognize the full value of the Yorkville Equity Facility Financing Agreement and may not receive any proceeds from the exercise of our outstanding Warrants, and the potential adverse effect on the prevailing market prices for our Common Shares as a result of sales, or the perception of future sales, of Common Shares could adversely affect our ability to raise additional capital.
Although we have entered into the Yorkville Equity Facility Financing Agreement, we may not recognize the full value thereof. Specifically, our ability to sell Common Shares to Yorkville pursuant to the Yorkville Equity Facility Financing Agreement is subject to certain restrictions and limitations, which may prevent us from selling the full commitment amount prior to the expiration of the commitment period. Our ability to recognize the full value of the Yorkville Equity Facility Financing Agreement may be further impeded by the potential negative pressure on the
13
market price of our Common Shares as a result of sales, or the perception of future sales, of Common Shares by us or by other security holders. As a result, there can be no assurance that we will receive all or even a significant portion of the proceeds that we expect to receive in connection with the Yorkville Equity Facility Financing Agreement.
In addition, upon exercise, we will receive the cash exercise price of our outstanding Warrants (assuming, that they are not exercised on a cashless basis, as applicable). We believe the likelihood that holders will exercise their Warrants, and therefore, the amount of cash proceeds that we would receive, is, among other things, dependent upon the market price of our Common Shares. For so long as the market price for our Common Shares is less than the applicable exercise price of the Warrants, we believe such holders will be unlikely to exercise their Warrants. The potential adverse effect on the prevailing market price of our Common Shares as a result of sales of Common Shares by us or by other security holders, or the perception that such sales may occur, could keep the market price for our Common Shares below the applicable exercise price of the Warrants. Accordingly, the holders of the Warrants may not exercise their Warrants before they expire, and we may not receive any proceeds from the exercise of the outstanding Warrants.
We may not recognize the full value of the DoD Agreement.
Subject to the terms and conditions of the DoD Agreement, the DoD will reimburse ECRC for a portion of the costs incurred by ECRC under the DoD Agreement and ECRC is entitled to receive up to an aggregate of approximately $10.0 million of reimbursement payments from the DoD upon the achievement of certain project milestones. If the Company is not successful in achieving the milestones required under the DoD Agreement or if the reimbursements sought by the Company are rejected or the DoD Agreement is terminated prior to completion of all milestones, the Company may not receive all or even a significant portion of the payments as reimbursements for expenses incurred as expected under the DoD Agreement.
The Company has identified material weaknesses in its internal control over financial reporting. If not remediated, the Company’s failure to establish and maintain effective disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting could result in material misstatements in its financial statements and a failure to meet its reporting and financial obligations, each of which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition and the trading price of the Common Shares.
Our management has identified material weaknesses in its internal control over financial reporting relating to deficiencies in the principles associated with the control environment, risk assessment, control activities, and monitoring components of internal control, based on the criteria established by the COSO Framework, that constitute material weaknesses, either individually or in the aggregate. A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of a company’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.
As discussed in Item 9A, “Controls and Procedures,” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, the Company’s management has assessed the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting and its disclosure controls and procedures and concluded that they were not effective as of June 30, 2025.
The Company is committed to remediating its material weaknesses as promptly as possible. Management is in the process of implementing its remediation plan. However, there can be no assurance as to when the material weaknesses will be remediated or that additional material weaknesses will not arise in the future. If the Company is unable to maintain effective internal control over financial reporting, its ability to record, process and report financial information timely and accurately could be adversely affected, which could subject the Company to litigation or investigations, require management resources, increase costs, negatively affect investor confidence and adversely impact the trading price of the Common Shares.
We may face litigation and other risks as a result of the material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting.
We identified material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting that exist as of June 30, 2025. As a result of such material weaknesses and other matters raised or that may in the future be raised by the SEC or the
14
Canadian securities regulators, we face potential for litigation or other disputes, which may include, among others, claims invoking the federal and state securities laws, contractual claims or other claims arising from the material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting and the preparation of our financial statements. As of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, we have no knowledge of any such litigation or dispute. However, we can provide no assurance that such litigation or dispute will not arise in the future. Any such litigation or dispute, whether successful or not, could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Risks Related to Mining and Development
We face numerous uncertainties in estimating our mineral reserves and resources and inaccuracies in our estimates could result in lower than expected revenues, higher than expected costs, and decreased profitability.
A mineral is economically recoverable when the price at which we may sell the mineral exceeds the costs and expenses of mining and selling the mineral. Forecasts of our future performance are based on, among other things, estimates of our mineral reserves. We base our reserve and resource information on engineering, economic, and geological data assembled and analyzed by qualified persons, which include various engineers and geologists on our staff and with third parties. Our estimates are also subject to SEC regulations regarding classification of reserves and resources, including S-K 1300. Our reserve and resource estimates as to both quantity and quality are updated from time to time to reflect additional information received. There are numerous uncertainties inherent in estimating quantities and qualities of mineral reserves and resources, including many factors beyond our control.
Estimates of mineral reserves and resources necessarily depend upon a number of variable factors and assumptions, any one of which may, if incorrect, result in an estimate that varies considerably from actual results. These factors and assumptions include, but are not limited to:
| ● | geologic and mining conditions, which may not be fully identified by available exploration data and may differ from our experience; |
| ● | demand for the minerals that we plan to produce; |
| ● | current and future market prices for minerals and contractual arrangements; |
| ● | current and future operating costs and capital expenditures may exceed estimates, notwithstanding that, under S-K 1300, operating cost and capital expenditure estimates in feasibility studies must have an accuracy level of at least ±15% and a contingency range not exceeding 10%; |
| ● | additional capital expenditure related to the modification of the proposed surface plant related to the potential addition of rare earth elements; |
| ● | severance and excise taxes, royalties and development and reclamation costs; |
| ● | future mining technology improvements; |
| ● | the effects of regulation by governmental agencies; |
| ● | the ability to obtain, maintain and renew all required permits; |
| ● | employee health and safety; and |
| ● | historical production from the area compared with production from other producing areas. |
The conversion of reported mineral resources to mineral reserves should not be assumed, and the reclassification of reported mineral resources from lower to higher levels of geological confidence should not be assumed. As such, actual mineral tonnage recovered from identified reserves, and revenues and expenditures with respect to our reserves, may vary materially from estimates. Thus, these estimates may not accurately reflect our actual reserves. Any material inaccuracy in our estimates related to our reserves could result in lower than expected revenues, higher than expected costs, or decreased profitability, which could materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial position, and cash flows.
The nature of mineral exploration and production activities involves a high degree of risk and the possibility of uninsured losses.
Exploration for and the production of minerals is highly speculative and involves much greater risk than many other businesses. Most exploration programs do not result in the discovery of mineralization, and any mineralization discovered may not be of sufficient quantity or quality to be profitably mined. Our operations are, and any future
15
development or mining operations we may conduct will be, subject to all of the operating hazards and risks normally incident to exploring for and developing mineral properties, such as, but not limited to:
| ● | economically insufficient mineralized material; |
| ● | fluctuation in production costs that make production uneconomical; |
| ● | labor disputes; |
| ● | unanticipated variations in grade and other geologic problems; |
| ● | environmental hazards; |
| ● | water conditions; |
| ● | difficult surface or underground conditions; |
| ● | industrial accidents; |
| ● | metallurgical, pyrometallurgical, and other processing problems; |
| ● | mechanical and equipment performance problems; |
| ● | failure of dams, stockpiles, wastewater transportation systems, or impoundments; |
| ● | unusual or unexpected rock formations; and |
| ● | personal injury, fire, flooding, cave-ins, and landslides. |
Any of these risks can materially and adversely affect, among other things, the development of properties, production quantities and rates, costs and expenditures, potential revenues, and production dates. We currently have very limited insurance to guard against some of these risks. If we determine that capitalized costs associated with any of our mineral interests are not likely to be recovered, we would incur a write-down of our investment in these interests. All of these factors may result in losses in relation to amounts spent that are not recoverable, or that result in additional expenses.
We have no history of producing commercial products from our current mining properties and there can be no assurance that we will successfully establish mining operations or profitably produce minerals.
We have no history of producing commercial products from our current mining properties. We do not produce commercial products and do not currently generate operating earnings. While we seek to move our Elk Creek Project from a development stage property to a production stage property, such efforts will be subject to all of the risks associated with establishing new mining operations and business enterprises, including:
| ● | the timing and cost, which are considerable, of the construction of mining and processing facilities; |
| ● | the availability and costs of skilled labor and equipment; |
| ● | compliance with environmental and other governmental approval and permit requirements; |
| ● | the availability of funds to finance construction and development activities; |
| ● | potential opposition from non-governmental organizations, local groups, or local residents that may delay or prevent development activities; and |
| ● | potential increases in construction and operating costs due to changes in the cost and availability of labor, fuel, power, materials, and equipment and supplies, and the time elapsed since the most recent estimates of cost and availability were made. |
It is common in new mining and processing operations to experience unexpected problems and delays during engineering, procurement, construction, commissioning, and initial operations. In addition, our management and workforce will need to be expanded, and sufficient housing and other support systems for our workforce will have to be established. This could result in delays in the commencement of production and increased costs of production. Accordingly, we cannot assure you that our activities will result in profitable operations or that we will successfully establish mining and processing operations.
Results of metallurgical testing by us may not be favorable to, or as expected by, us.
We have completed significant bench, mini-pilot, and pilot scale metallurgical testing on material from the Elk Creek Project and will continue to complete necessary metallurgical testing at the bench, mini-pilot, and pilot scale as the exploration and, if warranted, development of the Elk Creek Project progresses. There can be no assurance that the results of such metallurgical testing will be favorable to, or will be as expected by, us. Furthermore, there can be no certainty that metallurgical recoveries obtained in bench or pilot scale tests will be achieved in either subsequent
16
testing or commercial operations. The development of a complete metallurgical process to produce saleable final products from the Elk Creek Project is a complex and resource-intensive undertaking that may result in overall schedule delays and increased project costs for us.
Price volatility could have dramatic effects on our results of operations and our ability to obtain financing for the Elk Creek Project and execute our business plan.
The price of commodities varies on a daily basis. Niobium is a specialty metal and not a commonly traded commodity such as copper, zinc, gold, or iron ore. The price of niobium tends to be set through a limited long-term offtake market, contracted between very few suppliers and purchasers. The world’s largest supplier of niobium, Companhia Brasileira de Metalurgia e Mineração, supplies approximately 85% of the world’s niobium. Any attempt to suppress the price of niobium by such supplier, or an increase in production by any supplier in excess of any increased demand, would have negative consequences on the price of niobium and, potentially, on our value. The price of niobium may also be reduced by the discovery of new niobium deposits, which could not only increase the overall supply of niobium (causing downward pressure on its price) but could draw new firms into the niobium industry that would compete with us.
Sc2O3 is used in solid oxide fuel cells and has the potential to become a valuable alloy with aluminum in the aerospace and automotive industries. Supply of scandium has been sporadic in recent years, and there are no primary scandium mines in the world at present. Production primarily occurs as a by-product from existing metallurgical plants, primarily in Russia, Canada, the Philippines, and China. Our management believes the Elk Creek Project would significantly increase the world’s supply of scandium trioxide. Although the Company’s market studies indicate a positive outlook for demand, there is no assurance at present that the Company could sell all of its production. In addition, the sale of scandium represents a significant portion of the Elk Creek Project revenue; achieving the revenue projected in the Company’s studies is subject to market growth in scandium, which is a developing market with a risk of oversupply and/or undersupply disrupting pricing.
Titanium metal is used in various superalloys and other applications for aerospace applications, armor, and medical implants, and in oxide form is a key component of pigments used in paper, paint, and plastics. The Elk Creek Project would produce a small quantity of titanium dioxide relative to other producers. As a small producer, we would be subject to fluctuations in the price of TiO2 that would result from normal variations in supply and demand for this commodity.
In addition, the niobium, scandium, titanium, and potentially, rare earth products, that we intend to produce at the Elk Creek Project are also subject to additional commodity-specific price cycles resulting from, among other factors, export controls, taxes and other tariffs and fees. Volatility in the demand for, and prices of, the niobium, scandium, titanium, and potentially, rare earth products, that we intend to produce at the Elk Creek Project may adversely affect the overall value of the Elk Creek Project and impact our ability to obtain financing for the Elk Creek Project on acceptable terms, or at all.
We may not be able to establish a viable recovery process for REEs.
The market for rare earth products requires particular levels of purity and chemical form, which are achieved through the extraction and separation of individual REEs from each other as well as from the other constituents in the rare earth ore. At present, the Company has substantially completed the engineering and testing of a process for producing commercial rare earth products but has not completed all work necessary to declare a REE reserve estimate for the Elk Creek deposit. The completion of the work necessary to demonstrate an economically feasible rare earth recovery system will require additional expenditures of cash and time to complete. There is no guarantee that the Company will be successful in demonstrating positive economics for a rare earth recovery system tied to the Elk Creek Project, nor is there any guarantee that once constructed, the rare earth recovery system will operate as designed and produce saleable commercial products.
Estimates of resources and reserves are subject to evaluation uncertainties that could result in project failure.
Our exploration and future mining operations, if any, are and would be faced with risks associated with being able to accurately predict the quantity and quality of resources/reserves within the earth using statistical sampling techniques. Estimates of any resources/reserves on any of our properties would be made using samples obtained from
17
appropriately placed trenches, test pits, underground workings, and intelligently designed drilling. There is an inherent variability of assays between check and duplicate samples taken adjacent to each other and between sampling points that cannot be reasonably eliminated. Additionally, there also may be unknown geologic details that have not been identified or correctly appreciated at the current level of accumulated knowledge about our properties. This could result in uncertainties that cannot be reasonably eliminated from the process of estimating resources/reserves. If these estimates were to prove to be unreliable, we could implement an exploitation plan that may not lead to commercially viable operations in the future.
Any material changes in mineral resource/reserve estimates and grades of mineralization will affect the economic viability of placing a property into production and a property’s return on capital.
Mineral resource/reserve estimates may require adjustments or downward revisions. In addition, the grade of ore ultimately mined, if any, may differ from that indicated by our feasibility studies and drill results. Minerals recovered in small scale tests may not be duplicated in large scale tests under on-site conditions or at commercial production scale.
The mineral resource and mineral reserve estimates included in the S-K 1300 Elk Creek Technical Report Summary and contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K have been determined based on assumed future prices, cut-off grades, and operating costs that may prove to be inaccurate. Extended declines in market prices for our products may render portions of our resource/reserve estimates uneconomic and may result in reduced reported resources/reserves or may adversely affect any commercial viability determinations we may reach. Any material reductions in estimates of resources/reserves could have a material adverse effect on our Common Share price and on the value of our properties.
We face intense competition in the mining industry.
The mining industry is intensely competitive in all of its phases, and we compete with other companies for capital. As a result of this competition, some of which is with large established mining companies with substantial capabilities and with greater financial and technical resources than ours, we may be unable to obtain financing for the Elk Creek Project on terms we consider acceptable, or at all, or to acquire and develop additional properties in the future. In addition, we compete with others in efforts to obtain resources to advance the Elk Creek Project to construction and commercial operation, including mining and processing equipment, as well as qualified managerial and technical employees. If we are unable to successfully compete for required resources, including qualified employees, we may have difficulty in advancing the Elk Creek Project to construction and commercial operation. In addition, in competing for qualified personnel, we may be required to pay compensation or benefits relatively higher than those paid in the past, and the availability of qualified personnel may be limited in high-demand periods.
Difficulties in water balance management at our Elk Creek Project could negatively affect our potential production and economics at the project.
The Company has conducted three field investigations and two major technical studies into the hydrogeology of the Elk Creek carbonatite, which is the geologic formation which hosts the mineralized material that would be extracted by the Company’s mining operations. The Company expects to encounter significant amounts of water in the carbonatite, which will need to be pumped out of the formation to facilitate a mining operation. Water quality analyses have demonstrated that this water will have elevated temperature and salt content when compared to other water resources in the area. While the Company has developed plans to treat water produced from the mine for use in its operations, there is no guarantee that the permits needed for the treatment of the water or the disposal of the resultant waste products will be issued by the State of Nebraska, nor is there any guarantee that such permits will be issued in a timely fashion. Further, based on such plans, the operations will rely on a water treatment system to achieve zero discharge of wastewater, and there is no guarantee that this system will function as designed or achieve nameplate treatment capacity.
Title to our properties may be subject to other claims that could affect our property rights and claims.
There are risks that title to our properties may be challenged or impugned. Our Elk Creek Project is located in Nebraska and may be subject to prior unrecorded agreements or transfers or native land claims, and title may be affected by undetected defects. Our current land and/or mineral rights lease agreements between ECRC and individual
18
landowners give us an option to purchase additional property (“OTP”), which, along with the property we already own, will allow us to construct the Elk Creek Project once sufficient project financing is obtained. The rights of the current owners to sell the property subject to these options may be subject to prior unrecorded or unknown claims to title. Further, our current OTP agreements, some of which are important for our planned operations, are of fixed duration and expire between December 2029 and May 2040, and we may incur additional cost and delays in securing renewals of such OTPs. We have investigated our rights to explore and exploit the Elk Creek Project resource/reserve and, to the best of our knowledge, our rights in relation to lands covering the Elk Creek Project resource/reserve are in good standing. However, there may be valid challenges to the title of our properties that, if successful, could impair development and/or operations.
Our properties and operations may be subject to litigation or other claims.
From time to time our properties or operations may be subject to disputes that may result in litigation or other legal claims. We may be required to assert or defend against these claims, which will divert resources and management time from operations. The costs of these claims or adverse filings may have a material effect on our business and results of operations.
We do not currently insure against all the risks and hazards of mineral exploration, development, and mining operations.
Exploration, development, mining, and surface operations involve various hazards, including environmental hazards, industrial accidents, metallurgical and other processing problems, unusual or unexpected rock formations, structural cave-ins or slides, flooding, fires, and periodic interruptions due to inclement or hazardous weather conditions. These risks could result in damage to or destruction of mineral properties, facilities, or other property, personal injury, environmental damage, delays in operations, increased cost of operations, monetary losses, and possible legal liability. We may not be able to obtain insurance to cover these risks at economically feasible premiums or at all. We may elect not to insure where premium costs are disproportionate to our perception of the relevant risks. The payment of such insurance premiums and of such liabilities would reduce the funds available for exploration and production activities.
Risks Related to Government Regulation
We may not be able to obtain or renew all required permits and licenses to place any of our properties into production.
Our current and future operations, including development activities and commencement of production, if warranted, on the Elk Creek Project, require permits from governmental authorities and such operations are and will be governed by laws and regulations governing prospecting, development, mining, production, exports, taxes, labor standards, occupational health, waste disposal, toxic substances, land use, environmental protection, mine safety, and other matters. Companies engaged in mineral property exploration and the development or operation of mines and related facilities generally experience increased costs, as well as delays in production and other schedules as a result of the need to comply with applicable laws, regulations, and permits. We cannot predict if all permits that we may require for continued exploration, development, or construction of mining facilities and conduct of mining operations will be obtainable or renewable on reasonable terms, if at all. Costs related to applying for and obtaining permits and licenses may be prohibitive and could delay our planned exploration and development activities. Failure to comply with applicable laws, regulations, and permitting requirements may result in enforcement actions, including orders issued by regulatory or judicial authorities causing operations to cease or be curtailed, and may include corrective measures requiring capital expenditures, installation of additional equipment, or remedial actions.
Facilities associated with the Elk Creek Project, such as the mine, surface plant, tailings facilities, stockpiles and supporting infrastructure, are likely to either temporarily or permanently impact waterbodies and wetlands that are subject to regulation by the USACE as Waters of the United States (“WOUS”). We believe that we have obtained the necessary USACE permits to construct the project, but changes to the design or layout of the facility may trigger the USACE to require us to obtain and maintain additional permits for the Elk Creek Project. The duration of this permitting exercise is dictated by the USACE and would need to be completed before facilities that would impact WOUS could be constructed. We may experience delays or additional costs in relation to obtaining the necessary permits and these delays and additional costs could negatively affect the economics of the Elk Creek Project and our results of operations.
19
Parties engaged in mining operations may be required to compensate those suffering loss or damage by reason of the mining activities and may have civil or criminal fines or penalties imposed for violations of applicable laws or regulations. Amendments to current laws, regulations, and permits governing operations and activities of mining companies, or more stringent implementation thereof, could have a material adverse impact on our operations and cause increases in capital expenditures or production costs or reduction in levels of production at producing properties or require abandonment or delays in development of new mining properties.
We are subject to significant governmental regulations that affect our operations and costs of conducting our business.
Our current and future operations, including development of the Elk Creek Project, are and will be governed by laws and regulations, including:
| ● | laws and regulations governing mineral concession acquisition, prospecting, development, mining, and production; |
| ● | laws and regulations related to exports, taxes, and fees; |
| ● | labor standards and regulations related to occupational health and mine safety; and |
| ● | environmental standards and regulations related to waste disposal, toxic substances, land use reclamation, and environmental protection. |
Companies engaged in development activities often experience increased costs and delays in production and other schedules as a result of the need to comply with applicable laws, regulations, and permits. Failure to comply with applicable laws, regulations, and permits may result in enforcement actions, including the forfeiture of mineral claims or other mineral tenures and/or orders issued by regulatory or judicial authorities requiring operations to cease or be curtailed, and may include corrective measures requiring capital expenditures, installation of additional equipment, or costly remedial actions. We may be required to compensate those suffering loss or damage by reason of our development activities and may have civil or criminal fines or penalties imposed for violations of such laws, regulations, and permits.
Existing and possible future laws, regulations, and permits governing operations and activities of mineral development companies, or more stringent implementation, could have a material adverse impact on our business and cause increases in capital expenditures or require abandonment or delays in development. Our Elk Creek Project is located in Nebraska, and while the State does have a comprehensive and modern set of environmental regulations, it does not have specific regulations with respect to permitting or reclaiming mines which could potentially impact the total time to market for the project.
Our activities are subject to environmental laws and regulations that may change, thereby increasing our costs of doing business and restricting our operations.
All phases of our operations are subject to environmental regulation in the jurisdictions in which we operate. Environmental legislation is evolving in a manner that may require stricter standards and enforcement, increased fines and penalties for non-compliance, more stringent environmental assessments of proposed projects, and a heightened degree of responsibility for companies and their officers, directors, and employees. These laws address emissions into the air, discharges into water, management of waste, management of hazardous substances, protection of natural resources, antiquities and endangered species, and reclamation of lands disturbed by mining operations. Compliance with environmental laws and regulations, and future changes in these laws and regulations, may require significant capital outlays and may cause material changes or delays in our operations and future activities. It is possible that future changes in these laws or regulations could have a significant adverse impact on our properties or some portion of our business, causing us to re-evaluate those activities at that time.
20
Regulations and pending legislation governing issues involving climate change could result in increased operating costs, which could have a material adverse effect on our business.
A number of governments or governmental bodies have introduced or are contemplating legislative and/or regulatory changes in response to concerns about the potential impact of climate change. Legislation and increased regulation regarding climate change could impose significant costs on us, on our future venture partners, if any, and on our suppliers, including costs related to increased energy requirements, capital equipment, environmental monitoring and reporting, and other costs necessary to comply with such regulations. Any adopted future climate change regulations could also negatively impact our ability to compete with companies situated in areas not subject to such limitations. Given the emotion, political significance, and uncertainty surrounding the impact of climate change and how it should be dealt with, we cannot predict how legislation and regulation will affect our financial condition, operating performance, and ability to compete. Furthermore, even without such regulation, increased awareness and any adverse publicity in the global marketplace about potential impacts on climate change by us or other companies in our industry could harm our reputation. The potential physical impacts of climate change on our operations are highly uncertain and could be particular to the geographic circumstances in areas in which we operate and may include changes in rainfall and storm patterns and intensities, water shortages, changing sea levels, and changing temperatures. These impacts may adversely impact the cost, production, and financial performance of our operations.
Land reclamation requirements for our properties may be burdensome and expensive.
Although variable depending on location and the governing authority, land reclamation requirements are generally imposed on mineral exploration companies (as well as companies with mining operations) in order to minimize long-term effects of land disturbance.
Reclamation may include requirements to:
| ● | control dispersion of potentially deleterious effluents; |
| ● | treat ground and surface water to achieve water quality standards; and |
| ● | reasonably re-establish pre-disturbance landforms and vegetation. |
In order to carry out reclamation obligations imposed on us in connection with our potential development activities, we must allocate financial resources that might otherwise be spent on further exploration and development programs. We plan to set up a provision for our reclamation obligations on our properties, as appropriate, but this provision may not be adequate. If we are required to carry out unanticipated reclamation work, our financial position could be adversely affected.
Risks Related to Our Debt
The level of our indebtedness from time to time could impair our ability to obtain additional financing.
From time to time, we may enter into transactions to acquire assets or the shares of other companies or to fund development of the Elk Creek Project. These transactions may be financed partially or wholly with debt, which may increase our debt levels above industry standards. Our articles of incorporation do not limit the amount of indebtedness that we may incur. Our indebtedness could impair our ability to obtain additional financing in the future on a timely basis to take advantage of business opportunities that may arise. Our ability to service our debt obligations will depend on our future operations, which are subject to prevailing industry conditions and other factors, many of which are beyond our control.
Risks Related to the Common Shares
NioCorp may be a “passive foreign investment company” for the current taxable year and for one or more future taxable years, which may result in materially adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences for U.S. investors.
If NioCorp is a passive foreign investment company (“PFIC”) for any taxable year, or portion thereof, that is included in the holding period of a U.S. holder of Common Shares or other securities of NioCorp, such U.S. holder
21
may be subject to certain adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences. These adverse tax consequences include requirements to treat any gain realized upon a disposition of Common Shares or other securities, or any “excess distribution” received on Common Shares, as ordinary income, to pay an interest charge on a portion of such gain or distribution, and certain additional reporting requirements. Such consequences may be mitigated with respect to Common Shares (but not with respect to Warrants or other securities of NioCorp) if the holder thereof makes a timely and effective “qualified electing fund” or “QEF” election or a “mark-to-market” election. A U.S. holder of Common Shares that makes a QEF election generally must include in income on a current basis for U.S. federal income tax purposes its share of NioCorp’s net capital gain and ordinary earnings for any taxable year in which it is a PFIC, whether or not NioCorp distributes any amount to its shareholders. A U.S. holder of Common Shares that makes a mark-to-market election generally must include as ordinary income each year the excess of the fair market value of the Common Shares over the taxpayer’s basis therein.
NioCorp generally will be classified as a PFIC for a taxable year if (a) 75% or more of its gross income for such year is “passive income” (generally, dividends, interest, rents, royalties, and gains from the disposition of assets producing passive income) or (b) at least 50% or more of the value of its assets produce, or are held for the production of, passive income, based on the quarterly average of the fair market value of such assets. NioCorp believes that it was classified as a PFIC for its taxable years ended June 30, 2025 and 2024 and, based on the current composition of its income and assets, as well as current business plans and financial expectations, may be classified as a PFIC for its current or future taxable years. Any conclusion regarding PFIC status is a factual determination that must be made annually at the close of each taxable year and, thus, is subject to change. In addition, even if NioCorp concluded it did not qualify as a PFIC, it is possible that the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”) could assert, and that a court could sustain, a determination that NioCorp is a PFIC. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that NioCorp will not be treated as a PFIC for any taxable year. The PFIC rules are complex and each holder of Common Shares or other securities of NioCorp should consult its own tax advisors regarding these rules and the U.S. federal income tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership, and disposition of such securities.
The 2023 Transactions could result in NioCorp becoming subject to materially adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences.
Section 7874 and related sections of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), provide for certain adverse tax consequences when the stock of a U.S. corporation is acquired by a non-U.S. corporation in certain transactions in which former shareholders of the U.S. corporation come to own 60% or more of the stock of the non-U.S. corporation (by vote or value, and applying certain specific counting and ownership rules). These adverse tax consequences include (i) potential additional required gain recognition by the U.S. corporation, (ii) treatment of certain payments to the non-U.S. corporation that reduce gross income as “base erosion payments,” (iii) an excise tax on certain options and stock-based compensation of the U.S. corporation, (iv) disallowance of “qualified dividend” treatment for distributions by the non-U.S. corporation, and (v) if former shareholders of the U.S. corporation come to own 80% or more of the stock of the non-U.S. corporation, treatment of the non-U.S. corporation as a U.S. corporation subject to U.S. federal income tax on its worldwide income (in addition to any tax imposed by non-U.S. jurisdictions). If the 2023 Transactions result in the application of any of these, or any other, adverse tax consequences, NioCorp could incur significant additional tax costs. While NioCorp currently does not believe the 2023 Transactions will cause such adverse tax consequences as a result of Section 7874 and related sections of the Code, this determination is subject to significant legal and factual uncertainty. NioCorp has not sought and will not seek any rulings from the IRS as to the tax treatment of any of the 2023 Transactions. Further, there can be no assurance that your tax advisor, the IRS, or a court, will agree with the position that NioCorp is not subject to these adverse tax consequences.
Our Common Share price may be volatile and as a result you could lose all or part of your investment.
In addition to volatility associated with equity securities in general, the value of your investment could decline due to the impact of any of the following factors upon the market price of the Common Shares:
| ● | disappointing results from our exploration and/or, if warranted, project development efforts; |
| ● | decline in demand for Common Shares; |
| ● | downward revisions in securities analysts’ estimates or changes in general market conditions; |
| ● | technological innovations by competitors or in competing technologies; |
22
| ● | investor perception of our industry or our prospects; and |
| ● | general economic trends. |
From July 1, 2024, to the date of this report, the trading price of our stock on the Nasdaq has ranged from a low of $1.27 to a high of $5.19.
In addition, stock markets in general have experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations, and the market prices of securities have been highly volatile. These fluctuations are often unrelated to operating performance and may adversely affect the market price of the Common Shares. As a result, you may be unable to sell any Common Shares you acquire at a desired price.
We have never paid dividends on the Common Shares.
We have not paid dividends on the Common Shares to date, and we may not be in a position to pay dividends for the foreseeable future. Our ability to pay dividends with respect to the Common Shares will depend on our ability to successfully develop one or more properties and generate earnings from operations. Further, our initial earnings, if any, will likely be retained to finance our operations. Any future dividends on Common Shares will depend upon our earnings, our then-existing financial requirements, and other factors, and will be at the discretion of our Board.
Future sales, or the perception of future sales, of Common Shares by existing shareholders or by us, or future dilutive issuances of Common Shares by us, could adversely affect prevailing market prices for the Common Shares and cause investors to suffer dilution in their net book value per Common Share.
Sales of a substantial number of Common Shares in the public market could occur at any time, including issuances and sales of additional Common Shares by us and sales by other security holders. These sales, or the market perception that the holders of a large number of Common Shares or securities convertible, exercisable, or exchangeable into Common Shares intend to sell Common Shares, could reduce the prevailing market price of the Common Shares. The effect, if any, that future public sales of these securities or the availability of these securities for sale will have on the market price of the Common Shares is uncertain. If the market price of the Common Shares were to drop as a result, this might impede our ability to raise additional capital and might cause remaining shareholders to lose all or part of their investment.
The Articles of NioCorp, as amended, permit us to issue an unlimited number of Common Shares. Subject to the requirements of the British Columbia Business Corporations Act and Nasdaq, we will not be required to obtain the approval of the NioCorp shareholders for the issuance of additional Common Shares. We have issued Common Shares in the past and will continue to issue Common Shares to finance our activities in the future. In addition, outstanding Options and Warrants and securities convertible into or exchangeable for Common Shares may be exercised, converted, or exchanged resulting in the issuance of additional Common Shares. If we issue additional Common Shares or decide to enter into joint ventures with other parties in order to raise financing through the sale of equity securities, investors’ interests in the Company will be diluted and investors may suffer dilution in their net book value per Common Share depending on the price at which such securities are sold.
Additionally, pursuant to the Yorkville Equity Facility Financing Agreement, Yorkville has committed to purchase up to an additional $46.9 million of our Common Shares, at our direction from time to time during the remaining seven months of the commitment period, subject to certain limitations and the satisfaction of the conditions in the Yorkville Equity Facility Financing Agreement. We have filed a registration statement under the Securities Act covering resales by Yorkville of the Common Shares issuable pursuant to the Yorkville Equity Facility Financing Agreement. Accordingly, any Common Shares that we issue pursuant to the Yorkville Equity Facility Financing Agreement will be available for sale into the public market, subject to applicable securities laws, which could reduce the prevailing market price for the Common Shares.
We are subject to the continued listing criteria of the Nasdaq and our failure to satisfy these criteria may result in delisting of the Common Shares.
Our Common Shares are currently listed on the Nasdaq Global Market under the symbol “NB”. The public NioCorp Assumed Warrants are currently listed on Nasdaq under the symbol “NIOBW.” The Nasdaq Capital Market
23
has rules for continued listing. In order to maintain the listings, we must maintain certain financial and share distribution targets, including maintaining a minimum number of public shareholders.
If Nasdaq delists the Common Shares, investors may face material adverse consequences, including, but not limited to, a lack of a trading market for the Common Shares, reduced liquidity, a determination that our Common Shares are a “penny stock,” decreased analyst coverage of the Company, and an inability for us to obtain additional financing to fund our operations.
If our Common Shares are considered a penny stock and are subject to the penny stock rules, broker-dealers may be discouraged from effecting transactions in Common Shares.
Our Common Shares have in the past, and may in the future, be considered a “penny stock.” The SEC has adopted Rule 15g-9 which generally defines “penny stock” to be any equity security that has a market price (as defined) less than $5.00 per share or an exercise price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to certain exceptions. Applicable penny stock rules impose additional sales practice requirements on broker-dealers who sell to persons other than established customers and “accredited investors.” The term “accredited investor” refers generally to institutions with assets in excess of $5.0 million or individuals with a net worth in excess of $1.0 million or annual income exceeding $200,000 or $300,000, jointly with their spouse. The penny stock rules require a broker-dealer, prior to a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from the rules, to deliver a standardized risk disclosure document in a form prepared by the SEC, which provides information about penny stocks and the nature and level of risks in the penny stock market. The broker-dealer also must provide the customer with current bid and offer quotations for the penny stock, the compensation of the broker-dealer and its salesperson in the transaction, and monthly account statements showing the market value of each penny stock held in the customer’s account. The bid and offer quotations, and the broker-dealer and salesperson compensation information, must be given to the customer orally or in writing prior to effecting the transaction and must be given to the customer in writing before or with the customer’s confirmation. In addition, the penny stock rules require that prior to a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from these rules, the broker-dealer must make a special written determination that the penny stock is a suitable investment for the purchaser and receive the purchaser’s written agreement to the transaction. If and when applicable, these disclosure requirements may have the effect of reducing the level of trading activity in the secondary market for the Common Shares. Consequently, these penny stock rules may affect the ability of broker-dealers to trade in the Common Shares.
| ITEM 1B. | UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS |
None.
| ITEM 1C. | CYBERSECURITY |
Cybersecurity
risk management is
We are in the process of evaluating our cybersecurity needs and developing appropriate measures to enhance our cybersecurity posture. Our goal is to establish a cybersecurity framework that is commensurate with our size, complexity, and nature of our operations.
24
| ITEM 2. | PROPERTIES |
Elk Creek Project, Nebraska
Our principal mineral property is the Elk Creek Property, a niobium, scandium and titanium development stage property. The Elk Creek Project has established indicated and inferred resources along with probable reserves and the Company has completed a feasibility study for the project. The below information is in part summarized or extracted from our S-K 1300 Elk Creek Technical Report Summary, which was filed as Exhibit 96.1 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2022, and is incorporated by reference into this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The Company does not have any other material properties.
The qualified persons responsible for the S-K 1300 Elk Creek Technical Report Summary are Dahrouge Geological Consulting USA Ltd.; Understood Mineral Resources Ltd.; Optimize Group; Tetra Tech; Adrian Brown Consultants Inc.; Metallurgy Concept Solutions; Magemi Mining Inc.; L3 Process Development; A2GC; Scott Honan, M.Sc, SME-RM, NioCorp; Dumas Contracting Ltd.; Mahmood Khwaja, P.E., CDM Smith; and Wynand Marx, M.Eng, BBE Consulting. A matrix of the sections for which each qualified person is responsible is included in the S-K 1300 Elk Creek Technical Report Summary, except that Dumas Contracting Ltd., as evidenced by its consent filed as Exhibit 23.14 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K has reviewed, approved, and taken responsibility for Sections 13.7.1, 13.7.2, 13.7.3, 13.7.4, 13.7.9, 13.7.10, 13.7.11, 13.7.12, 13.7.13, 13.7.14, 15.1.3, 15.1.4 and 23.1.8 of the S-K 1300 Elk Creek Technical Report Summary. Except for Scott Honan, none of the qualified persons is affiliated with the Company. Mr. Honan is the Chief Operating Officer of the Company. The disclosure of scientific or technical information in this Annual Report on Form 10-K was reviewed and approved by Mr. Honan who is a qualified person as defined in NI 43-101, and Mr. Honan has verified the data disclosed herein.
Property Description and Location
The Elk Creek Property is a carbonatite deposit located in Johnson County, southeast Nebraska, USA. The carbonatite contains elements of economic significance, including niobium, titanium, and scandium, as well as potential economic significance for rare earth products. The Elk Creek Property is situated as shown below and is located within the USGS Tecumseh Quadrangle Nebraska SE (7.5 minute series) mapsheet in Sections 1-6, 9-11; Township 3N; Range 11E and Sections 19-23, 25-36; Township 4N, Range 11E, at approximately 40°16’ north and 96°11’ west in the State of Nebraska, in central USA. The Elk Creek Property is approximately 45 miles southeast of Lincoln, Nebraska, the state capital of Nebraska.
25
Title and Ownership
Land in the project area is exclusively owned by private entities, and there is no federal or state land in the project area. The Company has secured its rights to the project area by purchasing land from private landowners or by entering into agreements with the landowners as described below.
The Company currently owns approximately 227 acres of land and associated mineral rights, and an additional 80 acres of surface rights and 40 acres of mineral rights, all within the carbonatite footprint. The Elk Creek Project’s mine infrastructure and a portion of the supporting operations is planned to be located on this land. Ownership of the mineral rights discussed above includes a 2% NSR royalty and grants us access to more than 90% of the Elk Creek Project’s mineral resources and mineral reserves.
As of June 30, 2025, the total book value of the Elk Creek Property and associated buildings and equipment was $16.9 million.
On August 1, 2025, ECRC closed on its option to purchase three parcels of land in the project area, consisting of the property known as Woltemath80S and approximately 1.66 acres of the property known as Woltemath002, for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $2.7 million, pursuant to the terms of two OTPs.
The Company currently holds six OTPs that are associated with the Elk Creek Project and one perpetual easement on a land parcel adjacent to the Missouri River. The current optioned land package covers an area of 1,272 acres and is reflective of the land needed to secure the remaining mineral resources and mineral reserves held under the OTPs along with the land needed for the development and operations of the Elk Creek Project for its proposed 38-year operating life.
In general, exercise of an OTP is accomplished by paying the greater of a fixed amount per acre or a multiple of the appraised value at the time of purchase. If the land is not purchased by the Company during the term of the OTP and the land in question is needed for the project, the Company intends to negotiate a new OTP with the landowner. The OTP is accompanied by a negotiated payment to the landowner that is paid upon execution of the OTP by the Company and the landowner. As of June 30, 2025, the Company was obligated to make payments totaling approximately $101,000 over the next 15 years to maintain our rights under these OTPs. Details on the current OTPs held by the Company are shown in the table below.
26
Active Lease Agreements (OTPs) Covering the Elk Creek Project as of September 2025
| Agreement Identifier | Acres | Agreement Expiry |
| Woltemath002 | 375.15 | 04-Dec-29 |
| Heidemann005 | 196.57 | 16-Mar-30 |
| Nielsen001 | 249.32 | 25-Jun-30 |
| Woltemath003J | 220.00 | 25-Mar-30 |
| Beethe007 | 163.75 | 20-Jan-31 |
| Shuey001 | 80.00 | 27-May-40 |
The OTPs are between NioCorp’s subsidiary ECRC and the individual landowners. Land subject to the OTP agreements is currently used for agricultural purposes, including growing row crops (corn and soybeans) and pasturing livestock. The land owned by ECRC houses the Company’s drill core inventory and geological sample repository in two steel core shed buildings and the Company maintains a cover crop (sorghum and rye) on portions of the property that were formerly used for growing row crops. The former landowner maintains a residence and several outbuildings on the property subject to a life estate that accompanied the purchase of the property by the Company in fiscal year 2021.
The agreements that involve mineral rights include a 2% NSR royalty attached with the OTP. The OTPs grant the Company an exclusive right to explore and evaluate the property for the term thereof, with an option to purchase the surface rights or a combination of the mineral and surface rights at any time during the term. As the Woltemath80S agreement was limited to an option to purchase the surface rights only, it does not contain an NSR provision.
Land Tenure Map as of September 2025
The current estimated mineral resource and reserve is wholly contained within land owned by the Company and parcel Woltemath003J. The Company considers these two properties to be the only properties on which the Company’s development of the Elk Creek Project is substantially dependent.
As part of the OTPs, where required, the Company has also secured surface rights, which allow for access to the land for drilling activities and associated mineral exploration and project development work.
27
Accessibility, Physiography, Climate and Infrastructure
The Elk Creek Property is easily accessible year-round as it is situated approximately 45 miles southeast of Lincoln, Nebraska, the state capital, and approximately 68 miles south of Omaha, Nebraska. Access to the site can be completed via road or from one of the regional airports. There are several regular flights to both Lincoln and Omaha; however, the Elk Creek Property is most easily accessible from Lincoln. From Lincoln Municipal Airport, the Elk Creek Property is accessed via paved roads on the main network and a secondary network of gravel roads. The drive from the Lincoln Municipal Airport to the property is typically 1 hour and 15 minutes, and from Omaha’s Eppley Airport, the drive is approximately 1 hour and 45 minutes.
The Elk Creek Property is immediately adjacent to paved Nebraska state highway 50, and the mineral resource and mineral reserve are centered in Township 4N, Range 11E, Section 33. This section is immediately southwest of the junction of Nebraska state highways 50 and 62. Rail access is available in the town of Elk Creek, which is located 3 miles east of the project area. Water is available at the project site from a well, as well as from Elk Creek, which crosses Section 33. Water is also available from the Johnson County Rural Water system, which has distribution infrastructure on the north side of the Section 33 and from the Pawnee County Rural Water system, which has distribution infrastructure on the south side of Section 33. Electricity is provided at the Company’s Core Storage sheds located on the west side of Section 33 on land owned by the Company from the Omaha Public Power District (“OPPD”). Personnel are available from the local surrounding towns, including Elk Creek (3 miles east), Tecumseh (6 miles north), Steinauer (5 miles south), Pawnee City (10 miles south) and Syracuse (27 miles north). Due to the project’s location in Nebraska, there are no ports nearby.
Southeast Nebraska is situated in a humid continental climate (Dfa) on the Köppen climate classification system. In eastern Nebraska, this climate is generally characterized by hot humid summers and cold winters. Average winter temperatures vary between 13°F to 35°F. Average summer temperatures vary between 64°F to 90°F. Exploration, construction and operational activities may be conducted all year round.
Average monthly precipitation (rain and snowfall) varies between 0.9 and 5.0 inches. Average yearly precipitation is between 31 and 33 inches with an average yearly snowfall of approximately 28 inches. Nebraska is located within an area known for tornadoes which runs through the central U.S. where thunderstorms are common in the spring and summer months. Tornadoes primarily occur during the spring and summer and may occur into the autumn months.
There are several local communities near the Elk Creek Property, including Elk Creek and Tecumseh, that will provide local housing for the Elk Creek Project. There are a number of other communities within driving distance and the large cities of Lincoln and Omaha are within reasonable driving distance. Mining activities currently taking place in the area are limited to limestone and aggregate operations to support the local cement manufacturing and construction industries.
The Elk Creek Project is expected to incorporate surface and underground infrastructure, as well as tailings storage facilities. The offsite infrastructure is expected to include a new high voltage transmission line constructed by the local utility company and providing power to an on-site primary sub-station and a natural gas pipeline built by the owner of the interstate pipeline. Water used for all on-site process needs and activities will be supplied from mine dewatering activities, local groundwater wells and from a local water utility. See “2022 Elk Creek Feasibility Study” below for additional information regarding proposed infrastructure related to the Elk Creek Project.
The local topography of eastern Nebraska is relatively low-relief with shallow rolling hills intersected by shallow river valleys. Elevation varies from about 1,066 to 1,280 ft above sea level. Bedrock outcrop exposure is nonexistent in the Elk Creek Project area.
The majority of the area around the Elk Creek Project is used for cultivation of corn and soybeans, along with uses as grazing land. Native vegetation typical of eastern Nebraska is upland tall-grass, prairie and upland deciduous forests.
28
Geology and Mineralization
Geology
The Elk Creek Property includes a carbonatite that has intruded older Precambrian granitic and low- to medium-grade metamorphic basement rocks. The carbonatite is an elliptical magmatic body with a northwest-trending long axis perpendicular to the strike of the Midcontinent Rift System, near the northern part of the Nemaha uplift. The carbonatite consists predominantly of dolomite, calcite and ankerite, with lesser chlorite, barite, phlogopite, pyrochlore, serpentine, fluorite, sulfides, bastnasite, monazite, and quartz. It is, however, believed from stratigraphic reconstruction based on drill core observation in the area that the carbonatite is unconformably overlain by approximately 200 m of essentially flat-lying Palaeozoic marine sedimentary rocks, including carbonates, sandstones and shales of Pennsylvanian age.
Mineralization
The property hosts niobium, titanium, and scandium mineralization as well as REE mineralization that occurs within the Elk Creek carbonatite. The current known extents of the carbonatite unit are approximately 950 m along strike, 300 m wide, and 750 m in dip extent, below the unconformity. Niobium, titanium, scandium, and rare earths are considered the main elements of interest.
The deposit contains significant concentrations of niobium. Based on the metallurgical testwork completed to date at a number of laboratories using QEMSCAN® analysis, the niobium mineralization is known to be fine grained, and that 77% of the niobium occurs in the mineral pyrochlore, while the balance occurs in an iron-titanium-niobium oxide mineral of varying composition.
Within the Elk Creek carbonatite, a host of other elements exist with varying degrees of concentration. The Company has completed both whole rock analysis and multi-element analysis on all samples for the 2014 drilling program, described below, plus resampling of selected historical core/pulps between 2011 and 2014.
Historical Exploration
Drilling at the Elk Creek Property was conducted in three phases. The first was during the 1970’s and 1980’s by the Molybdenum Company of America (“Molycorp”), the second in 2011 by Quantum Rare Earth Developments Corp (“Quantum” - NioCorp under its former name), and the third and latest program from 2014 to 2016 by NioCorp. To date, 129 diamond core holes have been completed for a total of 64,981 m over the entire geological complex. Of these, a total of 48 holes (33,909 m) have been completed to date in the mineralized area and are used in the current mineral resource and reserve estimates. Five additional holes, with a total length of 3,353.1 m, were drilled for hydrogeologic and geotechnical purposes in 2015. No sampling has been completed of these five holes to date and therefore they have not been considered for the mineral resource or reserve estimates.
All drilling has been completed using a combination of Tricone, Reverse Circulation (“RC”) or Diamond Drilling (“DDH”) in the upper portion of the hole within the Pennsylvanian sediments. All drilling within the underlying carbonatite has been completed using DDH methods.
Summary of Drilling Database within Elk Creek Deposit Area
| Year | Company | Number of Holes | Average Depth (m) | Sum Length (m) | ||||||||||
| 1973-1986 | Molycorp | 27 | 596.6 | 16,108.2 | ||||||||||
| 2011 | Quantum | 3 | 772.6 | 2,317.7 | ||||||||||
| 2014 to present | NioCorp | 18 | 845.4 | 15,482.8 | ||||||||||
| Total | 48 | 700.9 | 33,908.7 | |||||||||||
29
Molycorp, 1973-1986
Between 1973 and 1974, Molycorp completed six drillholes: EC-1 to EC-4, targeting the Elk Creek anomaly, and two other holes outside the Elk Creek anomaly area. Drillholes were typically carried out by RC drilling through the overlying sedimentary rocks and diamond drilling through the Ordovician-Cambrian basement rocks.
Molycorp continued their drill program from 1977 and, in May 1978, Molycorp made its discovery of the current mineral resource with drillhole EC-11. EC-11 is located on Section 33, Township 4N, and Range 11. The carbonatite hosting the Elk Creek Project was intersected at a vertical depth of 203.61 m (668 ft).
Molycorp continued its drilling program through to 1984, which mainly centered on the Elk Creek Project within a radius of roughly 2 km. By 1984, Molycorp had completed 57 drillholes within the Elk Creek gravity anomaly area, which included 25 drillholes over the Elk Creek Project area.
From 1984 to 1986, drilling was focused on the Elk Creek gravity anomaly area. The anomaly area is roughly 7 km in diameter and drilling was conducted on a grid pattern of approximately 610 m by 610 m (roughly 2,000 ft by 2,000 ft) with some closer spaced drillholes in selected areas.
By 1986, a total of 106 regional drillholes were completed for a total of approximately 46,797 m (153,532 ft). The deepest hole reached a depth of 1,038 m (3,406 ft) and bottomed in carbonatite.
Quantum, 2011
In April 2011, Quantum conducted a preliminary drill program (three holes) on the Elk Creek deposit and two REE exploration targets (two holes), which have been excluded from the current mineral resource and reserve estimation, as they do not intersect the Nb2O5 anomaly and are located to the east. The objectives of the drill program over the Elk Creek Property were to verify the presence of higher-grade niobium mineralization at depth, and to infill drill the known niobium deposit in order to upgrade the resource category of the previous resource estimate and expand the known resource. The drill program was also established to collect sufficient sample material for metallurgical characterization and process development studies of the niobium mineralization.
The 2011 program consisted of five inclined drillholes, totaling 3,420 m of NQ size diameter core. Inclusive of this total, three drillholes, totaling 2,318 m, were drilled into the known Elk Creek deposit.
NioCorp, 2014 to Present
NioCorp commenced drilling on the Elk Creek Property using a three-phased program. The three-phased program was originally based on 14 drillholes for approximately 12,150 m (announced in a press release on April 29, 2014), but was subsequently expanded during the program to 18 drillholes for approximately 15,482 m. Three of the 18 drillholes were drilled for the purpose of metallurgical characterization and process development studies. Two of these drillholes, NEC14-MET-01 and NEC14-MET-02, were not assayed, while NEC14-MET-03 was quarter cored with one quarter being assayed and the remainder used for metallurgical testwork. The drilling has been orientated to intersect the geological model from the southwest and northeast (perpendicular to the strike), with the exception of NEC14-011 and NEC14-012, which were oriented southeast and northwest, respectively.
During fiscal year 2022, NioCorp collected a total of 1,095 samples originating from 18 diamond drill holes completed by MolyCorp, as discussed above. These samples were collected, and subsequently assayed, in order to fill in gaps in our records regarding REE grades and tonnage that may exist in the deposit. Assaying was conducted at Actlabs in Ancaster, Ontario. The assay results were subjected to a Quality Assurance and Quality Control (“QA/QC”) program consistent with industry best practices.
Internal Controls
NioCorp integrated a series of routine QA/QC procedures throughout the sampling and analysis portion of the drilling programs to ensure the highest level of quality was maintained throughout the process leading to the estimate of mineral reserves and mineral resources for the Elk Creek Project. This included the insertion of duplicate samples taken from various stages of the process, insertion of known control samples (standard reference materials, certified reference materials (“CRM”), and blanks) and sending third-party pulps to a secondary lab (SGS Canada Inc.).
30
Sample tickets were assigned initially at the core shed using barcodes with duplicate tickets placed inside and on the outside of the bag. Sample identification was confirmed using barcode labelling and visual sample type comparisons before sample shipment. The use of barcoded samples ensured both shipment forms and analytical labs used accurate information. Multiple types of QC samples were inserted at this stage of the process, which includes the following:
| ● | Field quartz blanks (1 in 20, or 5%) were inserted within or immediately after samples collected from mineralized intervals, targeting zones of elevated visual mineralization, where possible. |
| ● | CRMs (1 in 20, or 5%) were inserted in the field with the sample sequence. |
| ● | Field quarter-core duplicates (1 in 20, or 5%) were inserted to test mineralization and sampling variability. |
Additional details on the QA/QC program can be found in Section 8 of the S-K 1300 Elk Creek Technical Report Summary.
Mineral deposits, including the Elk Creek deposit, are inherently uncertain because of variability at all scales and sparse sampling. In addition to uncertainty associated with estimation, there are specific risks and sources of uncertainty associated with the Elk Creek deposit. See Item 1A., Risk Factors.
S-K 1300 and other similarly purposed International Codes (JORC, 2012; NI 43-101, 2014) are designed to require disclosure to the public of risks relating to mineral resource and reserve estimation as identified and evaluated by a qualified person. The qualified persons responsible for the S-K 1300 Elk Creek Technical Report Summary address the technical risks in various sections and consider that no material technical risks are identified. Additional descriptions of the risks and uncertainty associated with reported mineral reserves and resources can be found in Section 11 of the S-K 1300 Elk Creek Technical Report Summary.
2022 Elk Creek Feasibility Study
During fiscal year 2022, the Company launched geological, metallurgical, engineering, and other analyses to assess the feasibility of adding REE production to its plans once sufficient work has been completed. The Company and its consultants were required to complete additional assays of historical drill core to fill data gaps in the existing resource database to establish an REE mineral resource. The mine plan was also updated and the S-K 1300 Elk Creek Technical Report Summary was filed with the SEC as an exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2022. The S-K 1300 Elk Creek Technical Report Summary was based on the economic and process results of the feasibility study conducted by the qualified persons, which were also presented in the 2022 NI 43-101 Elk Creek Technical Report.
The Elk Creek Project is planned as an underground mining operation using a long-hole stoping mining method and paste backfill, operating with a processing rate of 2,764 tonnes per day. Expected total production over the 38-year mine life includes 171,140 tonnes of payable niobium, 3,676 tonnes of Sc2O3, and 431,793 tonnes of TiO2. Estimated up-front direct capital costs are $760 million, in addition to indirect costs of $187 million, pre-production capital costs of $92 million, an overall contingency of $102 million, and pre-production net revenue credit of $257 million.
Financial Analysis Included in the 2022 Elk Creek Feasibility Study
The metrics reported in the S-K 1300 Elk Creek Technical Report Summary are based on the cash flow model results. The metrics are on both a pre-tax and after-tax basis, on a 100% equity basis with no Elk Creek Project financing inputs and are in first quarter 2019 U.S. constant dollars. Foreign exchange impacts were deemed negligible as most, if not all, costs and revenues are denominated in U.S. dollars. Key criteria used in the analysis are discussed in detail throughout this section.
31
Principal Project Assumptions Included in the 2022 Elk Creek Feasibility Study
| Description | Value |
| Pre-Production Period | 4 years |
| Process Plant Life | 38 years |
| Mine Operating Days per Year | 365 |
| Mill Operating Days per Year | 365 |
| Discount Rate, End of Period | @ 8% |
| Commercial Production Year | 2025 |
Summary of Key Evaluation Metrics Included in the 2022 Elk Creek Feasibility Study
| Description | Value |
| Ore Mined (kt) | 36,655 |
| Ore Mining Rate (t/d) | 2,764 |
| Niobium Grade | 0.81% |
| Scandium Grade (parts per million, “ppm”) | 70.2 |
| TiO2 Grade | 2.92% |
| Contained Nb2O5 (kt) | 297 |
| Contained Sc (t) | 2,573 |
| Contained TiO2 (kt) | 1,071 |
| Total Ore Processed (kt) | 36,655 |
| Processing Rate (kt/y) | 1,009 |
| Average Recovery, Nb2O5 | 82.4% |
| Average Recovery Sc | 93.1% |
| Average Recovery TiO2 | 40.3% |
| Recovered Nb2O5 (kt) | 245 |
| Recovered Sc (t) | 2,395 |
| Recovered TiO2 (kt) | 432 |
| Realized Market Prices | |
| Nb ($/kg) | $46.55 |
| TiO2 ($/kg) | $0.99 |
| Sc2O3 ($/kg) | $3,674 |
| Payable Metal | |
| Nb (t) | 171,140 |
| Sc2O3 (t) | 3,676 |
| TiO2 (t) | 431,793 |
32
Summary Projected Economic Results Included in the 2022 Elk Creek Feasibility Study
| Description | Value ($000) |
| Total Gross Revenue | $21,899,726 |
| Operating Costs: | |
| Mining Cost | (1,553,325) |
| Process Cost | (3,911,116) |
| Site G&A Cost | (300,400) |
| Concentrate Freight Cost | (10,472) |
| Other Infrastructure Costs | (200,407) |
| Water Management Cost | (609,195) |
| Tailings Management Cost | (73,822) |
| Property Tax | (217,540) |
| Royalties | (300,503) |
| Annual Bond Premium | (5,500) |
| Total Operating Costs | (7,182,280) |
| Operating Margin (EBITDA(1)) | 14,717,445 |
| Effective Tax Rate | 16.42% |
| Total Taxes | (2,246,186) |
| Working Capital | - |
| Operating Cash Flow | $12,471,258 |
Totals may not sum due to rounding.
| (1) | The term “EBITDA” refers to earnings before interest, taxes depreciation and amortization. See “Non-GAAP Financial Performance Measures” below for a discussion of the use of non-GAAP financial measures. |
Capital Cost Estimates Included in the 2022 Elk Creek Feasibility Study
The following table shows the breakout in LoM initial capital and sustaining capital cost estimates (excluding closure and reclamation of $44 million), which total $1,562 million. This includes a total initial capital cost of $1,141 million, including a 10% contingency.
| ($000,000) | |||
| Description | Initial | Sustaining | Total |
| Capitalized Preproduction Expenses | $ 77 | $ - | $ 77 |
| Site Preparation and Infrastructure | 41 | 15 | 56 |
| Processing Plant | 367 | 96 | 464 |
| Water Management and Treatment | 74 | 24 | 97 |
| Mining Infrastructure | 257 | 198 | 455 |
| Tailings Management | 21 | 79 | 100 |
| Site Wide Indirects | 7 | - | 7 |
| Processing Indirects | 96 | - | 96 |
| Mining Indirects | 41 | - | 41 |
| Commissioning | 15 | - | 15 |
| Owner’s Costs | 34 | - | 34 |
| Mine Water Management Indirects | 9 | - | 9 |
| Contingency | 102 | 9 | 111 |
| Total Capital Costs | $1,141 | $422 | $1,562 |
Totals may not sum due to rounding.
33
Operating Cost Estimates Included in the 2022 Elk Creek Feasibility Study
The following LoM unit operating costs include the pre-production and first/last years of production.
| Description | LoM $/t ore |
| Mining Cost | $42.38 |
| Process Cost | 106.70 |
| Water Management Cost | 16.62 |
| Site G&A Cost | 8.20 |
| Other Infrastructure | 5.47 |
| Tailings Management Cost | 2.01 |
| Other Expenses | 6.22 |
| Subtotal | 187.59 |
| Royalties/Annual Bond Premium | 8.35 |
| Total LoM Operating Costs | $195.94 |
Totals may not sum due to rounding.
Planned Mining Operations
The Elk Creek Project is planned as an underground mining operation using a long-hole stoping mining method and paste backfill, with shaft access to minimize development through water bearing horizons. The mine will utilize jumbo drills for lateral development and tophammer and down-the-hole drills for vertical development and production stoping. Rock bolters will be used for ground support and probe holes will be used to support mine grouting where required. Ore will be remotely mucked from the bottom stope accesses using 14 tonne Load-Haul-Dump units (“LHD”). The LHDs will transport the ore to an ore pass directly or to remuck bays to maximize the efficiency of the stope mucking operations. When needed, a second LHD and a fleet of 40 tonne haul trucks will be used to transport ore from the remuck bays to the grizzly feeding the underground material handling system. Multiple remuck bays are used on each level to avoid interference between the LHD and the haul trucks. The ore is fed through the grizzlys with rock breakers into an underground crusher (the “Primary Crusher”) and via a material handling system to the surface.
Planned Processing Operations
Planned ore process operations include mineral processing, hydrometallurgical processing (“Hydromet”), and pyrometallurgical processing (“Pyromet”) housed in separate buildings.
The mineral processing building will house all of its equipment within a single large building. Ore from the Primary Crusher (located in the underground mine) will be fed to the secondary cone crusher system, operating in closed circuit with a double deck screen. The screen undersize from the cone crusher system will be fed to a high-pressure grinding roll unit (“HPGR”), operating in closed circuit with another double deck screen. The HPGR screen undersize is the comminution product that will report to the Hydromet process.
The Hydromet plant building will be a multi-level engineered steel structure, which will house equipment on two levels. Ore from mineral processing will be fed through 15 individual processes required to separate the three recoverable products. The purpose of the Hydromet processing steps is to leach the pay metals into solution using two separate acid leaches (Hydrochloric Acid Leach and Sulfuric Acid Bake), remove impurities, separate the three pay metals, and perform precipitation/processing to final solid oxide forms. Outputs from the Hydromet process include saleable TiO2 and Sc2O3, with Nb2O5 reporting to the Pyromet plant for final processing. The Hydromet plant will be supported by a Hydrochloric Acid Regeneration plant and a Sulfuric Acid Plant.
The Pyromet building will house most of its equipment within a single building. The purpose of the Pyromet plant is to reduce the Nb2O5 coming from the Hydromet plant by converting it into a saleable FeNb metal. Aluminum shots and iron oxide pellets will be introduced to an electric arc furnace on a continuous basis along with fluxing agents and Nb2O5 to produce a saleable ferroniobium metal.
Proposed Production Plan and Schedule
Based on the 2022 Elk Creek Feasibility Study, the operating mine life is approximately 38 years with a nominal processing rate of 2,764 tonnes per day. The Elk Creek Project timeline is based on 39 months to mechanical
34
completion after Authorization to Proceed, plus an additional six months of commissioning and ramp-up to 100% of production capacity for a total of 45 months and assumes no financing constraints. The Board must approve a construction program and budget before construction of the Elk Creek Project can begin. This approval, along with the receipt of all required governmental permits and approvals and the completion of project financings, will determine whether and when construction of the Elk Creek Project can begin.
Proposed Tailings Storage
The tailings produced by the process plant will consist of filtered water leach residue, calcined excess oxide, and slag. Four engineered and lined tailings storage facilities (“TSFs”) will be constructed sequentially to contain the tailings over the life of the Elk Creek Project and would contain approximately 14.5 million tonnes of tailings. The tailings facilities have been designed to incorporate two independent areas: a composite-lined tailings solids storage area; and an area with double lined containment, including a leak collection and recovery system for management of stormwater runoff and drainage from the tailings solids. The TSFs will store predominantly dry (i.e., not in a slurry consistency) tailings from the plant with embankment construction based on a “downstream” construction method. Facility closure is considered in the design.
Proposed Salt Management
The crystalline salt produced as a waste product of heating and evaporating brine from the reverse osmosis (“RO”) water treatment plant will be transported by conveyor to the temporary salt staging area and then be transported by truck to the dedicated salt management cells (“SMC”). Two SMCs will be constructed sequentially to contain the salt over the life of the project and would contain approximately 1.63 million cubic meters of salt. The SMCs design will incorporate a composite-lined storage area with double-lined containment including a leak collection and recovery system for management of stormwater runoff and drainage.
Proposed Water Management
For the first several years of construction, the advancement of the shaft and underground workings will require limited dewatering, anticipated to be through lower-level sumping and pumping for surface collection and disposal. Initially, water will be stored in the lined SMC #1 during construction or will be trucked off-site for treatment at a local publicly owned treatment works. Excess water in the SMCs will be spray evaporated within the footprint of the SMC, to avoid the reintroduction of soluble salts into the water treatment system. Temporary on-site storage or off-site shipment and disposal of the crystallizer solid waste may be necessary until construction of SMC #1 is completed.
Once full operations commence, we anticipate a shortfall of approximately 3,700 gallons per minute of operational and processing water, as the underground mine dewatering is only expected to produce 1,000 gallons per minute. To make up this shortfall, we would purchase fresh water from a local utility and from local landowners.
Once tailings begin being deposited in the TSF, internal contact water (from residual moisture in the tailings and precipitation falling within the impoundment footprint) will need to be actively managed. This water will be collected and treated using lime softening to precipitate hydroxide and carbonate solid forms for many of the inorganic constituents. The treated water will be filtered to remove the solids (which will be returned to the TSF for disposal), and the clean water will be pumped to the process plant RO system for further treatment. The clean water from the process plant RO unit will be used in the process plant, and the reject concentrate will be crystallized and deposited into the SMCs.
Proposed Source of Power
The local power utility (Omaha Public Power District) will provide power from nearby transmission lines to the site. This will require that an approximate 18-mile transmission line be installed by the utility to provide the site sub-station with the required site power demand. The local power utility will also design and install the main substation that will be owned and maintained by the utility. This infrastructure will be paid back through rate charges on the electrical usage.
35
Proposed Source of Natural Gas
Natural gas, to be used throughout the Elk Creek Project during the construction and operation phases of the project, will be brought to the site via pipeline from the local utility company. NioCorp has a natural gas transportation contract with Tallgrass Energy, which operates the Rockies Express (“REX”) pipeline. Tallgrass will construct a 45 kilometer (28 mile) gas pipeline lateral from the main REX pipeline system in Kansas to the project site. The lateral will be sized to provide a minimum of 27.5 dekatherms of gas per day. Natural gas will be distributed to all on-site facilities utilizing buried high-density polyethylene natural gas distribution pipe. Natural gas piping above ground and located inside of facilities will consist predominately of carbon steel pipe. Maximum on-site pipeline distribution pressure will be 100 pounds per square inch gauge. Natural gas will be used for facility heating, water heating, and for gas-fired process equipment.
Markets
Market studies for niobium, TiO2, and Sc2O3 are an important part of the proposed Elk Creek operation. These commodities, especially niobium and Sc2O3, are thinly traded without an established publicly available price discovery mechanism. Hence, detailed third-party market studies provide the basis for assumptions used in the economic analysis.
The economic analysis in the 2022 Elk Creek Feasibility Study used the 2019 U.S. dollar base price of $47/kg Nb as the forward-looking price for steel grade (65%) ferroniobium based on published independent third-party reports. The base price is adjusted to a realized price to account for the discount provisions contained in the two ferroniobium offtake agreements that the Company has concluded.
NioCorp engaged OnG Commodities LLC (“OnG”) to produce a market assessment in April 2017. The study examines current scandium production trends (approximately 20 tons/year) from existing and emerging producers plus an outlook for supply to 2028. The outlook then reviewed the current and emerging applications for scandium, including fuel cells, aerospace, industrial and other uses, plus an outlook for demand to 2028. Based on these inputs, OnG provided pricing forecasts and global demand volumes by year to 2028 based estimated production costs and supply-demand balances. The pricing for the OnG Commodities report was updated for NioCorp in 2019.
No formal market study was done for TiO2 as it only represents 2% of overall revenue in the economic analysis. All market information for titanium and TiO2 is derived from USGS Commodity Market Summaries (Bedinger, 2019).
Taxation Rates Included in the 2022 Elk Creek Feasibility Study
Taxes that may be levied on the Elk Creek Project include corporate income tax rates of 21% for federal and 5.84% for Nebraska. The Elk Creek Project is eligible for federal depletion allowances and credits, as well as various state incentives. The calculated effective income tax rate for the Elk Creek Project is 16.42% for the 2022 Feasibility Study.
Design Considerations for Environmental Performance
The current mine design incorporates the following strategies and technologies designed to minimize environmental impacts of operation:
| ● | Zero Process Liquid Discharge: The Elk Creek facility will now operate as a “Zero Process Liquid Discharge” facility, with no releases of process liquids. Instead, both naturally occurring, brackish (slightly salty) water produced during mining operations, and water used in ore processing, will be treated on site for use in operations. A solid salt will be produced from water treatment operations which will be stored on site. |
| ● | Additional Protection of Groundwater Resources Through Artificial Ground Freezing: The Elk Creek Project’s new mine design will utilize artificial ground freezing as part of the process of sinking the production and ventilation shafts. Artificial ground freezing creates a temporary frozen barrier that helps to protect groundwater resources in the area while shaft-sinking operations are underway. |
| ● | Avoidance of Permanent Impacts to Federally Jurisdictional Waters: We designed the layout of the Elk Creek Project to minimize or avoid permanent impacts to any federally jurisdictional waters and/or wetlands on the |
36
property. This reduced the expected environmental impacts and allowed the Elk Creek Project to secure a Clean Water Act Section 404 permit from the USACE under the Nationwide Permit Program, a much more efficient and less expensive process than an individual Section 404 permit. No other NEPA-level federal permits are now expected to be required for the Elk Creek Project.
| ● | Recycling of Reagents Used in Mineral Processing: Metallurgical and process advances made in 2016 and 2017 are expected to help reduce the volume of material planned for disposal in the Elk Creek Project’s tailings storage areas. As more of this material is recycled, the environmental footprint of the Elk Creek Project is reduced. |
| ● | Utilizing Tailings as Underground Mine Backfill: We plan to fill underground voids concurrently with mining operations using a paste backfill material that contains mine waste material that typically would be stored in above-ground tailings storage areas. |
The Company has not identified any significant encumbrances to the property it owns or holds under OTP agreements. The Company has not had any permit violations or fines since the filing of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024.
Permitting requirements for the project have been identified. The Company holds an Air Construction Permit from the State of Nebraska and a Special Use Permit from Johnson County, both of which are necessary to allow the start of project construction. In addition, the Elk Creek Project will be required to obtain a series of permits for operations from federal, state, and local agencies. The majority of these permits are ministerial in nature and present minimal risk to the Company and typically involve the completion of an application and the payment of a nominal fee. Three permits from the state of Nebraska are discretionary in nature, where an application and fee are provided to the state and the state must make a decision as to whether or not the permit will be granted. While the risk involved in such permits is low, such discretionary permits require more processing time by the state and do require the state agency to make a decision in favor of issuance of the permit. These three permits include the following:
| ● | Solid Waste Permit; |
| ● | Air Operating Permit; and |
| ● | Radioactive Materials License. |
The cost and schedule for obtaining both the discretionary and ministerial permits is included in the overall execution plan for the Elk Creek Project. Additional details on the project’s permitting requirements can be found in Section 17 of the S-K 1300 Elk Creek Technical Report Summary.
Mineral Reserves and Resources
The mineral reserves and mineral resources disclosed below are based on the S-K 1300 Elk Creek Technical Report Summary, which was originally filed as Exhibit 96.1 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2022. Mineral reserves and mineral resources at the Elk Creek Project as of June 30, 2025, are summarized in the tables below. Further discussion and background regarding the approaches used to establish mineral reserves and mineral resources is contained in Chapters 11 and 12 of the S-K 1300 Elk Creek Technical Report Summary.
37
Elk Creek Project In Situ Mineral Resource Estimate (niobium, titanium, and scandium) Excluding Reserves
as of June 30, 2025
| Class | NSR Cutoff | Tonnage (Mt) | ||
| Indicated | $180 | 151.7 | Nb2O5 (%) | Nb2O5 (kt) |
| 0.43 | 649.8 | |||
| TiO2 (%) | TiO2 (kt) | |||
| 2.02 | 3,067 | |||
| Sc (ppm) | Sc (t) | |||
| 56.42 | 8,558 | |||
| Inferred | $180 | 108.3 | Nb2O5 (%) | Nb2O5 (kt) |
| 0.39 | 426.6 | |||
| TiO2 (%) | TiO2 (kt) | |||
| 1.92 | 2,082 | |||
| Sc (ppm) | Sc (t) | |||
| 52.28 | 5,660 |
Elk Creek Project In Situ Mineral Resource Estimate (rare earth oxides) Excluding Reserves
as of June 30, 2025
| Class | NSR
Cut-off |
Tonnage (Mt) | ||||||||
| Indicated | $180 | 151.7 | La2O3 (%) | La2O3 (kt) | Ce2O3 (%) | Ce2O3 (kt) | Pr2O3 (%) | Pr2O3 (kt) | ||
| 0.0766 | 116.2 | 0.1320 | 200.2 | 0.0140 | 21.3 | |||||
| Nd2O3 (%) | Nd2O3 (kt) | Sm2O3 (%) | Sm2O3 (kt) | Eu2O3 (%) | Eu2O3 (kt) | |||||
| 0.0511 | 77.5 | 0.0116 | 17.6 | 0.0040 | 6.0 | |||||
| Gd2O3 (%) | Gd2O3 (kt) | Tb2O3 (%) | Tb2O3 (kt) | Dy2O3 (%) | Dy2O3 (kt) | |||||
| 0.0096 | 14.6 | 0.0011 | 1.6 | 0.0044 | 6.7 | |||||
| Ho2O3 (%) | Ho2O3 (kt) | Er2O3 (%) | Er2O3 (kt) | Tm2O3(%) | Tm2O3 (kt) | |||||
| 0.0006 | 1.0 | 0.0015 | 2.2 | 0.0002 | 0.3 | |||||
| Yb2O3 (%) | Yb2O3 (kt) | Lu2O3 (%) | Lu2O3 (kt) | Y2O3 (%) | Y2O3 (kt) | |||||
| 0.0010 | 1.5 | 0.0001 | 0.2 | 0.0187 | 28.4 | |||||
| LREO (%) | LREO (kt) | HREO (%) | HREO (kt) | TREO (%) | TREO (kt) | |||||
| 0.2737 | 415.2 | 0.0528 | 80.0 | 0.3265 | 495.2 | |||||
| Inferred | $180 | 108.3 | La2O3 (%) | La2O3 (kt) | Ce2O3 (%) | Ce2O3 (kt) | Pr2O3 (%) | Pr2O3 (kt) | ||
| 0.0943 | 102.1 | 0.1576 | 170.6 | 0.0163 | 17.7 | |||||
| Nd2O3 (%) | Nd2O3 (kt) | Sm2O3 (%) | Sm2O3 (kt) | Eu2O3 (%) | Eu2O3 (kt) | |||||
| 0.0575 | 62.2 | 0.0116 | 12.6 | 0.0038 | 4.1 | |||||
| Gd2O3 (%) | Gd2O3 (kt) | Tb2O3 (%) | Tb2O3 (kt) | Dy2O3 (%) | Dy2O3 (kt) | |||||
| 0.0090 | 9.8 | 0.0010 | 1.1 | 0.0042 | 4.6 | |||||
| Ho2O3 (%) | Ho2O3 (kt) | Er2O3 (%) | Er2O3 (kt) | Tm2O3(%) | Tm2O3 (kt) | |||||
| 0.0006 | 0.7 | 0.0014 | 1.5 | 0.0002 | 0.2 | |||||
| Yb2O3 (%) | Yb2O3 (kt) | Lu2O3 (%) | Lu2O3 (kt) | Y2O3 (%) | Y2O3 (kt) | |||||
| 0.0010 | 1.1 | 0.0001 | 0.1 | 0.0182 | 19.7 | |||||
| LREO (%) | LREO (kt) | HREO (%) | HREO (kt) | TREO (%) | TREO (kt) | |||||
| 0.3257 | 352.6 | 0.0512 | 55.5 | 0.3769 | 408.1 |
Notes:
| a. | Classification of mineral resources in the above tables is in accordance with the S-K 1300 classification system. Mineral resources in this table are reported exclusive of mineral reserves. |
| b. | Mineral resources that are not mineral reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability. |
| c. | The mineral resources are reported at a Diluted Net Smelter Return (NSR) Cut-off of $180/tonne. |
| d. | The diluted NSR is defined as: |
●
|  |
| ● | The diluted revenue from Nb2O5, TiO2, and Sc per block used the following factors: |
| ● | Nb2O5 Revenue: a 94% grade recovery, a 0.696 factor to convert Nb2O5 to Nb, 82.36% assumption for plant recovery, and a $39.60 selling price per kg of ferroniobium as of June 30, 2022. |
| ● | TiO2 Revenue: a 94% grade recovery, a 40.31% assumption for plant recovery, and an $0.88 kg selling price per kg of titanium oxide as of June 30, 2022. |
38
| ● | Sc Revenue: a 94% grade recovery, a 1.534 factor to convert Sc to Sc2O3, 93.14% assumption for plant recovery, and a $3,675 selling price per kg of scandium oxide as of June 30, 2022. |
| ● | The diluted tonnes are a 6% increase in the total tonnes of the block. |
| e. | Price assumptions for FeNb, Sc2O3, and TiO2 as shown in note d, above, are based upon independent market analyses for each product. |
| f. | Numbers may not sum due to rounding. The rounding is not considered to be material. |
| g. | Rare Earth Oxides (REO) were evaluated as a potential by-product to the mining of niobium, titanium, and scandium; thus, the estimated values of the REOs are reported using the previously determined diluted NSR as derived from the Nb2O5, TiO2, and Sc mineral resources and are assigned a price of $0. |
| h. | The stated Light Rare Earth Oxides (LREO) grade (%) is the summation of La2O3 (%), Ce2O3 (%), Pr2O3 (%), and Nd2O3 (%) estimates. |
| i. | The stated Heavy Rare Earth Oxides (HREO) grade (%) is the summation of Sm2O3 (%), Eu2O3 (%), Gd2O3 (%), Tb2O3 (%), Dy2O3 (%), Ho2O3 (%), Er2O3 (%), Tm2O3 (%), Yb2O3 (%), Lu2O3 (%), and Y2O3 (%) estimates. |
| j. | The stated Total Rare Earth Oxide (TREO) grade (%) is the summation of LREO (%) and HREO (%). |
| k. | The effective date of the mineral resource, including by-products, is June 30, 2025. |
Elk Creek Project Underground In Situ Mineral Reserves Estimate for Elk Creek
as of June 30, 2025
| Classification | Tonnage (kt) |
Nb2O5 Grade (%) |
Contained Nb2O5 (t) |
Payable Nb (t) |
TiO2 Grade (%) |
Contained TiO2 (t) |
Payable (t) |
Sc Grade (ppm) |
Contained Sc (t) |
Payable Sc2O3 (t) |
| Proven | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Probable | 36,656 | 0.81 | 297,278 | 170,409 | 2.92 | 1,071,182 | 431,793 | 70.2 | 2,573 | 3,677 |
| Total | 36,656 | 0.81 | 297,278 | 170,409 | 2.92 | 1,071,182 | 431,793 | 70.2 | 2,573 | 3,677 |
All figures are rounded to reflect the relative accuracy of the estimates. Totals may not sum due to rounding.
| ● | The qualified person for the mineral reserve estimate is Optimize Group Inc. The estimate has an effective date of June 30, 2025. |
| ● | The mineral reserve is based on the mine design, mine plan, and cash-flow model utilizing an average cut-off grade of 0.679% Nb2O5 with an NSR of $180/mt. |
| ● | The estimate of mineral reserves may be materially affected by metal prices, environmental, permitting, legal, title, taxation, socio-political, marketing, infrastructure development, or other relevant issues. |
| ● | The economic assumptions used to define mineral reserve cut-off grade are as follows: |
| ○ | Annual life of mine (LoM) production rate of ~7,450 tonnes of FeNb/annum during the years of full production. |
| ○ | Initial elevated five-year production rate ~ 7,500 tonnes of FeNb/annum when full production is reached. |
| ○ | Mining dilution of ~6% was applied to all stopes and development, based on 3% for the primary stopes, 9% for the secondary stopes, and 5% for ore development. |
| ○ | Mining recoveries of 95% were applied in longhole stopes and 62.5% in sill pillar stopes. |
| Parameter | Value | Unit |
| Mining Cost | 42.38 | $/t mined |
| Processing | 106.70 | $/t mined |
| Water Management and Infrastructure | 16.62 | $/t mined |
| Tailings Management | 2.01 | $/t mined |
| Other Infrastructure | 5.47 | $/t mined |
| General and Administrative | 8.91 | $/t mined |
| Royalties/Annual Bond Premium | 8.34 | $/t mined |
| Other Costs | 6.29 | $/t mined |
| Total Cost | 196.72 | $/t mined |
| Nb2O5 to Niobium Conversion | 69.60 | % |
| Niobium Process Recovery | 82.36 | % |
| Niobium Price | 39.60 | $/kg |
| TiO2 Process Recovery | 40.31 | % |
| TiO2 Price | 0.88 | $/kg |
| Sc Process Recovery | 93.14 | % |
| Sc to Sc2O3 Conversion | 153.40 | % |
| Sc Price | 3,675.00 | $/kg |
| ● | Price assumptions are as follows: FeNb $39.60/kg Nb, Sc2O3 $3,675/kg, and TiO2 $0.88/kg. Price assumptions are based upon independent market analyses for each product as of June 30, 2022. |
39
| ● | Price and cost assumptions are based on the pricing of products at the “mine-gate,” with no additional down-stream costs required. The assumed products are ferroniobium (metallic alloy shots consisting of 65%Nb and 35% Fe), a titanium dioxide product in powder form, and scandium trioxide in powder form. |
| ● | The mineral reserve has an average LoM NSR of $563.06/tonne. |
| ● | Optimize Group has provided detailed estimates of the expected costs based on the knowledge of the style of mining (underground) and potential processing methods (by third-party qualified persons). |
| ● | Mineral reserve effective date is June 30, 2025. The financial model was run after the estimate of the NSR above, which reflects a total cost per tonne of $196.72 versus $189.91. This is not considered a material change. |
| ● | Price variances for commodities are based on independent market studies versus earlier projected pricing. The independent market studies do not have a negative effect on the reserve. |
Comparison of Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves
There were no changes in the Elk Creek Project mineral resource or reserve estimates as of June 30, 2025, as compared to the Elk Creek Project mineral resource and reserve estimates as of June 30, 2024.
Environmental and Social
A number of key permits and environmental management requirements have been identified for the Elk Creek Project, some of which need to be implemented as soon as practicable in order to maintain the proposed Elk Creek Project schedule.
| ● | While not necessarily complex, the timing generally required to complete permitting through any federal regulatory agency requires that NioCorp engage key agencies (in this case the USACE and possibly the EPA) early on in Elk Creek Project development and consider the siting and orientation of facilities carefully to minimize the risk of a protracted National Environmental Policy Act analysis of the Elk Creek Project. At the present time, the Company believes that we have completed the major federal permitting actions needed for project construction, although changes to the design or location of project facilities may require that additional federal permits be obtained. |
| ● | Construction at the facility requires an Air Permit from the State of Nebraska, which was issued to the Company on June 2, 2020. The Air Permit describes all the prospective air emissions from the facility and required the completion of an air quality model that demonstrates compliance with the NAAQS. On April 15, 2022, the Company announced that the Nebraska Department of Environment and Energy advised the Company that periodic extensions to the Elk Creek Project’s Air Permit are no longer required because the Company has met the regulatory definition of “construction, reconstruction, or modification of the source” since the permit was issued. |
| ● | A radioactive materials license will be needed from the Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services (“NDHHS”), Office of Radiological Health. Because of their limited experience with hard rock mining in the State of Nebraska, much less mining that includes Naturally Occurring Radioactive Material, the NDHHS may require additional information and more time to approve the Elk Creek Project under a Broad Scope License. The Company has been working with NDHHS on this aspect of project permitting since 2014. |
| ● | Documentation of existing baseline environmental conditions at the Elk Creek Project site was initiated in 2014 and will continue as needed throughout the permitting process. |
| ● | Surface water monitoring will continue throughout the permitting process and extend into construction and operations as part of the Environmental Management System and likely State of Nebraska permit requirements. |
| ● | A wetland delineation and potential jurisdictional waters assessment was conducted in late 2014 to identify wetland and drainage features within the proposed Elk Creek Project boundary which resulted in a formal JD being issued by the USACE on September 6, 2016. |
| ● | The major land-use authorization for the project was received from Johnson County, Nebraska, on December 24, 2019, in the form of a Special Use Permit for the project. This land-use permit is a necessary precursor to any project-related construction activities. County zoning permits will be required for individual buildings constructed at the site, and the County requirement is that such applications must be submitted five days before construction commences. |
40
| ● | Closure costs for the Elk Creek Project have been estimated at just over $44 million, including approximately $13.5 million for reclamation and closure of the TSFs and $16.6 million for plant and building removal and reclamation. |
| ● | Community engagement has occurred in parallel with Nebraska field operations and has included public meetings, presentations to public agencies, communications with local and state politicians, meetings with environmental groups, and one-on-one meetings with area landowners. |
Other Elk Creek Project Activities
On October 30, 2024, the Company announced that it had completed bench-scale testwork at a demonstration-scale processing plant located in Trois-Rivieres, Quebec built by the Company and L3 Process Development (“L3”) and operated by L3 (the “Demonstration Plant”), that successfully demonstrated that the process developed for extracting and recovering rare earth oxides found in the ore at the Elk Creek Project can be used to recycle the rare earth content in rare earth permanent magnets. The L3 team was able to demagnetize and grind up permanent rare earth magnets and then leach the contained rare earth elements from the magnet. The successful outcome of this testing opens up the possibility of accepting mixed rare earth concentrate from other mines into the planned Elk Creek plant once it is constructed and operating to supplement the ore expected to be produced from the Elk Creek mine.
On April 23, 2025, the Company announced the launch of a drilling campaign (the “Campaign”) designed to support the conversion of a portion of its current Indicated Resources into Measured Resources and the subsequent conversion of a portion of its current Probable Mineral Reserves into Proven Mineral Reserves at the Elk Creek Project. On August 12, 2025, the Company announced the successful completion of the Campaign. The Campaign was inclusive of nine HQ diamond drillholes, totaling 6,817 meters of drilling. Core processing is currently underway with samples being sent to SGS USA for sample preparation and analysis. The Campaign supplemented previous exploratory drilling and operated under existing permits issued by the State of Nebraska. The Campaign was designed to complement other technical and economic analyses necessary to update the feasibility study for the Elk Creek Project. An updated feasibility study is necessary as part of the due diligence process for up to $800 million in potential debt financing that NioCorp is seeking from EXIM, as further discussed under “Part II, Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Liquidity and Capital Resources” below.
As a result of favorable outcomes from the Campaign in terms of schedule and budget, the Company has elected to add up to an additional six drillholes, totaling approximately 3,930 meters, which will form Phase II of the Campaign (“Phase II”). Phase II is designed to support the conversion of additional indicated resources into measured resources and the subsequent conversion of additional probable mineral reserves into proven mineral reserves, as well as capturing additional hydrogeologic and geomechanical data that will be used to continue derisking the underground mine design.
Proposed Activities
At present, the Company is maintaining the Elk Creek Property in anticipation of obtaining project financing that will facilitate the construction, commissioning, and operation of the Elk Creek Project. The property is characterized as a development stage property and is expected to move to a production stage property should financing be obtained.
As funds become available through the Company’s fundraising efforts, we expect to undertake the following activities:
| ● | Continuation of the Company’s efforts to secure federal, state and local operating permits; | |
| ● | Continued evaluation of the potential to produce rare earth products and sell such products under offtake agreements; |
| ● | Negotiation and completion of offtake agreements for the remaining uncommitted production of Nb, Sc, and Ti from the project, including the potential sale of Ti as titanium tetrachloride, as well as potential REE production; | |
| ● | Negotiation and completion of engineering, procurement, and construction agreements; |
| ● | Completion of the final detailed engineering for the underground portion of the Elk Creek Project; |
| ● | Initiation and completion of the final detailed engineering for surface project facilities; |
41
| ● | Construction of natural gas and electrical infrastructure under existing agreements to serve the Elk Creek Project site; |
| ● | Completion of water supply agreements and related infrastructure to deliver fresh water to the project site; |
| ● | Initiation of revised mine groundwater investigation and control activities; | |
| ● | Based on the results of the Company’s Demonstration Plant operations, update the characterization and testing of waste materials to support tailings impoundment and paste backfill plant designs; | |
| ● | Initiation of long-lead equipment procurement activities; and | |
| ● | Initiation of initial construction work at the project site. |
Non-GAAP Financial Performance Measures
Non-GAAP financial performance measures are intended to provide additional information only and do not have any standard meaning prescribed by U.S. GAAP. These measures should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for performance measures prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP.
The S-K 1300 Elk Creek Technical Report Summary uses non-GAAP financial performance measures, such as EBITDA, Averaged Annual EBITDA, and Averaged EBITDA Margin, for purposes of projecting the economic results of the Elk Creek Project. We are unable to provide a reconciliation of these forward-looking non-GAAP measures to the most comparable U.S. GAAP financial performance measures because certain information needed to reconcile those non-GAAP measures to the most comparable U.S. GAAP financial performance measures is dependent on future events, some of which are outside the control of the Company, such as FeNb, Sc2O3, and TiO2 prices, interest rates, and exchange rates. Moreover, estimating such U.S. GAAP measures with the required precision necessary to provide a meaningful reconciliation is extremely difficult and could not be accomplished without unreasonable effort.
Corporate Headquarters
We lease our principal executive office space at 7000 South Yosemite Street, Suite 115, Centennial, Colorado.
| ITEM 3. | LEGAL PROCEEDINGS |
As of September 11, 2025, we are not a party to any legal proceedings that could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, or operating results. Further, to the Company’s knowledge, no such proceedings have been threatened against the Company.
| ITEM 4. | MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES |
Pursuant to Section 1503(a) of the United States Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (the “Dodd-Frank Act”), issuers that are operators, or that have a subsidiary that is an operator, of a coal or other mine in the U.S. are required to disclose specified information about mine health and safety in their periodic reports. These reporting requirements are based on the safety and health requirements applicable to mines under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 (the “Mine Act”) which is administered by the U.S. Department of Labor’s Mine Safety and Health Administration (“MSHA”). During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2025, the Company and its subsidiaries and their properties or operations were not subject to regulation by MSHA under the Mine Act and thus no disclosure is required under Section 1503(a) of the Dodd-Frank Act.
42
PART II
| ITEM 5. | MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS, AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES |
Market Information
The Common Shares are listed for trading on the Nasdaq under the trading symbol “NB.” The Company also trades on the Frankfurt Stock Exchange as “BR3.”
Holders
As of September 11, 2025, we had 94 holders of record of the Common Shares.
Dividends
We have not paid any cash dividends on the Common Shares since our inception and do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. We plan to retain our earnings, if any, to provide funds for the expansion of our business.
Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans
See Equity Compensation Plan Information under Item 12, “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters,” for information on plans approved by our shareholders.
Purchases of Equity Securities by the Company
We did not make any repurchases in the quarter ended June 30, 2025.
Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities
The Company issued and sold the following Common Shares in reliance on Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act in connection with the closing of advances under the Yorkville Equity Facility Financing Agreement and based upon representations and warranties of Yorkville in connection therewith:
| Date | Gross Proceeds ($000) | Shares Issued | Price/Share |
| April 15, 2025 | $2,779 | 1,100,000 | $ 2.5261 |
| May 29, 2025 | 385 | 165,000 | 2.3337 |
| June 9, 2025 | 658 | 250,500 | 2.6257 |
| June 20, 2025 | 169 | 61,992 | 2.7200 |
| June 24, 2025 | 197 | 75,000 | 2.6251 |
| June 27, 2025 | 5,054 | 2,100,000 | 2.4065 |
Exchange Controls
There are no governmental laws, decrees, or regulations in Canada that restrict the export or import of capital, including foreign exchange controls, or that affect the remittance of dividends, interest or other payments to non-resident holders of the securities of NioCorp, other than Canadian withholding tax. See “Certain Canadian Federal Income Tax Considerations for U.S. Residents” below.
Certain Canadian Federal Income Tax Considerations for U.S. Residents
The following generally summarizes certain Canadian federal income tax consequences generally applicable under the Income Tax Act (Canada) and the regulations enacted thereunder (collectively, the “Canadian Tax Act”) and the Canada-United States Tax Convention (1980) (the “Convention”) to the holding and disposition of Common Shares.
43
Comment is restricted to holders of Common Shares each of whom, at all material times for the purposes of the Canadian Tax Act and the Convention, (i) is resident solely in the U.S. for tax purposes, (ii) is a “qualifying person” under and entitled to the benefits of the Convention, (iii) holds all Common Shares as capital property, (iv) deals at arm’s length with and is not affiliated with NioCorp, (v) does not and is not deemed to use or hold any Common Shares in a business carried on in Canada, (vi) is not an insurer that carries on business in Canada and elsewhere, (vii) is not an “authorized foreign bank” (as defined in the Canadian Tax Act), and (viii) has not entered into a “derivative forward agreement,” “synthetic equity arrangement,” or “synthetic disposition arrangement” (each as defined in the Canadian Tax Act) with respect to the Common Shares (each such holder, a “U.S. Resident Holder”).
Certain U.S.-resident entities that are fiscally transparent for U.S. federal income tax purposes (including limited liability companies) may not in all circumstances be entitled to the benefits of the Convention. Members of or holders of an interest in such an entity that holds Common Shares should consult their own tax advisers regarding the extent, if any, to which the benefits of the Convention will apply to the entity in respect of its Common Shares.
Generally, a U.S. Resident Holder’s Common Shares will be considered to be capital property of such holder provided that the U.S. Resident Holder is not a trader or dealer in securities, did not acquire, hold, or dispose of the Common Shares in one or more transactions considered to be an adventure or concern in the nature of trade (i.e. speculation), and does not hold the Common Shares in the course of carrying on a business.
This summary is based on the current provisions of the Canadian Tax Act and the Convention in effect as of the date prior to the date hereof, all specific proposals to amend the Canadian Tax Act and Convention publicly announced by or on behalf of the Minister of Finance (Canada) prior to the date hereof, and the current published administrative policies and assessing practices of the Canada Revenue Agency (the “CRA”). It is assumed that all such amendments will be enacted as currently proposed, and that there will be no other material change to any applicable law or administrative policy or assessing practice, whether by way of judicial, legislative or governmental decision or action, although no assurance can be given in these respects. Except as otherwise expressly provided, this summary does not take into account any provincial, territorial, or foreign tax considerations, which may differ materially from those set out herein.
This summary is of a general nature only, is not exhaustive of all possible Canadian federal income tax considerations and is not intended to be and should not be construed as legal or tax advice to any particular U.S. Resident Holder. U.S. Resident Holders are urged to consult their own tax advisers for advice with respect to their particular circumstances. The discussion below is qualified accordingly.
Disposition of Common Shares
A U.S. Resident Holder who disposes or is deemed to dispose of one or more Common Shares generally should not incur any liability for Canadian federal income tax in respect of any capital gain arising as a consequence of the disposition, unless the Common Shares constitute “taxable Canadian property” (as defined in the Canadian Tax Act) of the U.S. Resident Holder at the time of disposition and the U.S. Resident Holder is not entitled to relief under the Convention.
Generally, a U.S. Resident Holder’s Common Shares will not constitute “taxable Canadian property” of such holder at a particular time at which the Common Shares are listed on a “designated stock exchange” (which currently includes Nasdaq) unless at any time during the 60-month period that ends at the particular time both of the following conditions are concurrently met:
| 1. | 25% or more of the issued shares of any class of the capital stock of NioCorp were owned by or belonged to one or any combination of: |
| a. | the U.S. Resident Holder, |
| b. | persons with whom the U.S. Resident Holder did not deal at arm’s length, and |
| c. | partnerships in which the U.S. Resident Holder or a person referred to in clause (b) holds a membership interest directly or indirectly through one or more partnerships, and |
| 2. | more than 50% of the fair market value of the Common Shares was derived directly or indirectly from, one or any combination of, real or immovable property situated in Canada, “Canadian resource properties” (as defined |
44
| in the Canadian Tax Act), “timber resource properties” (as defined in the Canadian Tax Act), or options in respect of, or interests in any of the foregoing, whether or not the property exists. |
Common Shares may also be deemed to be “taxable Canadian property” in certain circumstances set out in the Canadian Tax Act.
Dividends on Common Shares
A U.S. Resident Holder to whom NioCorp pays or credits or is deemed to pay or credit a dividend on such holder’s Common Shares will be subject to Canadian withholding tax, and NioCorp will be required to withhold the tax from the dividend and remit it to the CRA for the holder’s account. The rate of withholding tax under the Canadian Tax Act is 25% of the gross amount of the dividend, but should generally be reduced under the Convention to 15% (or, if the U.S. Resident Holder is a company which is the beneficial owner of at least 10% of the voting stock of NioCorp, 5%) of the gross amount of the dividend. For this purpose, a company that is a resident of the United States for purposes of the Canadian Tax Act and the Convention and is entitled to the benefits of the Convention shall be considered to own the voting stock of NioCorp owned by an entity that is considered fiscally transparent under the laws of the United States and that is not a resident of Canada, in proportion to such company’s ownership interest in that entity.
| ITEM 6. | RESERVED |
| ITEM 7. | MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
The following Management’s Discussion and Analysis (“MD&A”) provides information that management believes is relevant to an assessment and understanding of the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of NioCorp and subsidiaries. This item should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Summary of Consolidated Financial and Operating Performance
The Company had no revenues from mining operations during the fiscal years presented below. Operating expenses incurred related primarily to performing exploration and feasibility study related activities, as well as the activities necessary to support corporate and shareholder duties.
| For the year ended June 30, | ||||||||
| 2025 | 2024 | |||||||
| ($000) | ||||||||
| Operating expenses | $ | 11,958 | $ | 13,757 | ||||
| Net loss attributable to the Company | (17,405 | ) | (11,435 | ) | ||||
| Net loss per share (basic and diluted) | (0.36 | ) | (0.31 | ) | ||||
The net loss attributable to the Company increased to $17.4 million for fiscal year 2025 from $11.4 million for fiscal year 2024. This increased net loss in fiscal year 2025 as compared to fiscal year 2024 is primarily due to the fiscal year 2025 recognition of non-cash losses related to the valuation of the Earnout Share and Warrant liabilities, partially offset by lower interest expense, financial instrument fair values, and operating expenses.
Results of Operations
The Company had no revenues from mining operations during the fiscal years presented below. Operating expenses incurred related primarily to performing exploration and feasibility study related activities, and the activities necessary to support corporate and shareholder duties, as detailed in the following table:
45
| For the year ended June 30, | |||||||
| 2025 | 2024 | ||||||
| ($000) | |||||||
| Operating expenses: | |||||||
| Employee related costs | $ | 1,944 | $ | 3,509 | |||
| Professional fees | 2,237 | 3,533 | |||||
| Exploration expenditures | 4,135 | 2,552 | |||||
| Other operating expenses | 3,642 | 4,163 | |||||
| Total operating expenses | 11,958 | 13,757 | |||||
| Change in fair value of earnout shares liability | 2,063 | (6,704 | ) | ||||
| Change in fair value of warrant liabilities | 4,093 | (1,875 | ) | ||||
| Change in fair value of convertible note | 40 | 2,542 | |||||
| Interest expense | 48 | 4,490 | |||||
| Foreign exchange gain | (5 | ) | (31 | ) | |||
| Interest income | (94 | ) | - | ||||
| Other gains | (122 | ) | (147 | ) | |||
| Loss on equity securities | 1 | 5 | |||||
| Income tax benefit | - | (139 | ) | ||||
| Loss attributable to noncontrolling interest | (577 | ) | (463 | ) | |||
| Net loss attributable to the Company | $ | (17,405 | ) | $ | (11,435 | ) | |
Fiscal Year 2025 as Compared to Fiscal Year 2024
Significant items affecting operating expenses are noted below:
Employee-related expenditures decreased in fiscal year 2025 as compared to fiscal year 2024 primarily due to a reduction in the number of Options issued to employees and the impact of a lower stock price on the Black-Scholes modeling results.
Professional fees decreased for fiscal year 2025 as compared to fiscal year 2024, primarily due to higher costs incurred in 2024 related to the timing of legal services associated with the Company’s SEC registration statements filed in October 2023, as well as increased audit fees associated with the Company’s June 30, 2023 financial statements and increased review fees in connection with the Company’s September 30, 2023 financial statements.
Exploration expenditures increased for fiscal year 2025 as compared to 2024, as fiscal year 2025 costs include expenditures related to a drilling program initiated by the Company in April 2025 designed to support the conversion of a portion of the Company’s current Indicated Resources into Measured Resources and the subsequent conversion of a portion of current Probable Mineral Reserves into Proven Mineral Reserves. Fiscal year 2024 costs included expenses associated with the third-party owned and operated Demonstration Plant, for which testwork was completed during the third quarter of fiscal year 2024.
Other operating expenses decreased for fiscal year 2025 as compared to fiscal year 2024 primarily due to a decrease in director and officer insurance expense, the timing of fully vested Options issued to board members and advisors, and declines in scandium development initiatives and financial-related services, partially offset by the expense incurred in 2025 associated with a cybersecurity incident that resulted in misdirected vendor payments.
Other significant items impacting the change in the Company’s net loss are noted below:
Change in fair value of Earnout Shares liability represents the change in fair value related to the Earnout Shares based on the results of Monte Carlo financial modeling. Overall, the increased expense in fiscal year 2025 corresponds to an overall increase in our share value during fiscal year 2025.
Change in fair value of Warrant liability represents the change in fair value related to our liability-classified Warrant obligations. The increase in expense during fiscal year 2025 is due primarily to the increase in the ending market value of our Common Shares as of June 30, 2025.
46
Change in fair value of convertible notes represents the impact of the initial allocation of fair value to the April 2024 Notes (as defined below), which are carried at fair value, as well as the impact of fair value adjustments through final payoff.
Interest expense decreased in fiscal year 2025 as compared to fiscal year 2024 due to the impacts of convertible debenture interest expense incurred in fiscal year 2024. This convertible debt instrument was paid off in early fiscal year 2025.
Loss attributable to noncontrolling interest represents the portion of net loss in ECRC attributable to the Vested Shares, which are not owned by the Company.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
We have no revenue generating operations from which we can internally generate funds. To date, our ongoing operations have been financed by the sale of our equity securities by way of public and private offerings, convertible securities issuances, the exercise of incentive Options and Warrants, and related party loans. With respect to currently outstanding Options and Warrants, we believe that exercise of these instruments, and cash proceeds from such exercises, will not occur unless and until the market price for our Common Shares equals or exceeds the related exercise price of each instrument.
On April 12, 2024, the Company issued and sold to Yorkville and Lind Global Fund II (“Lind II” and, together with Yorkville, the “April 2024 Purchasers”), $8.0 million aggregate principal amount of unsecured notes (the “April 2024 Notes”), pursuant to a securities purchase agreement, dated April 11, 2024, between the Company and each of the April 2024 Purchasers. The Company also issued to the April 2024 Purchasers, in proportion to the aggregate principal amount of the April 2024 Notes issued to each April 2024 Purchaser, Warrants to purchase up to 615,385 Common Shares. All remaining amounts due to Lind II ($176,000) and Yorkville ($1.0 million) under the April 2024 Notes were repaid on January 6, 2025, and February 7, 2025, respectively.
On September 11, 2024, the Company and Mark Smith entered into the Loan Agreement, by and between the Company and Mark Smith (the “Smith Loan Agreement”), which provides for a $2.0 million non-revolving credit facility (the “Smith Loan”). A total of $504,000 was subsequently drawn down, and subsequently the Company repaid $508,000, representing the balance of the interest and principal outstanding under the Smith Loan, plus $41,000 related to the loan origination fees payable.
On November 5, 2024, the Company closed an underwritten public offering (the “November 2024 Registered Offering”), pursuant to the underwriting agreement, dated November 3, 2024, with Maxim, as underwriter, which consisted of 1,592,356 Common Shares, 1,672,090 Series A Warrants to purchase up to an additional 1,672,090 Common Shares and 836,045 Series B Warrants to purchase up to 836,045 Common Shares.
On November 13, 2024, the Company closed a non-brokered private placement (the “November 2024 Private Offering”) pursuant to binding subscription agreements with certain accredited investors as part of a non-brokered private placement of 2,199,602 units of the Company (the “November 2024 Units”). Each November 2024 Unit consists of one Common Share, one Series A Warrant to purchase up to an additional Common Share and one-half of one Series B Warrant to purchase up to one-half of one Common Share.
On January 31, 2025, the Company closed an underwritten public offering (the “January 2025 Offering”), pursuant to the underwriting agreement, dated January 29, 2025, with Maxim, as underwriter, which consisted of 2,577,320 Common Shares, 2,577,320 Series A Warrants to purchase up to an additional 2,577,320 Common Shares and 1,288,660 Series B Warrants to purchase up to 1,288,660 Common Shares.
On April 21, 2025, the Company closed an underwritten public offering (the “April 2025 Offering”), pursuant to an underwriting agreement dated April 17, 2025, with Maxim, as underwriter, pursuant to which the Company issued and sold an aggregate of 8,015,812 Common Shares (or pre-funded Warrants in lieu thereof), which includes 323,504 Common Shares issued and sold pursuant to Maxim’s partial exercise of its over-allotment option.
47
The combined gross proceeds from the November 2024 Registered Offering, the November 2024 Private Offering, the January 2025 Offering, and the April 2025 Offering were approximately $31.8 million, before deducting underwriting discounts and offering expenses. In addition, during fiscal year 2025, the Company issued an aggregate of 6,499,977 Common Shares under the Yorkville Equity Facility Financing Agreement and through the exercise of Warrants by their holders, as a result of which, the Company received cash totaling approximately $13.8 million. A portion of these proceeds were used for working capital and general corporate purposes, to repay amounts outstanding on the Smith Loan, to repay the April 2024 Notes, and to advance efforts to launch construction of the Elk Creek Project and move it to commercial operation.
As of June 30, 2025, the Company had cash of $25.6 million and working capital of $24.8 million, compared to cash of $2.0 million and a working capital deficit of $9.0 million on June 30, 2024.
We expect that the Company will operate at a loss for the foreseeable future. The Company’s current planned cash needs are approximately $40.0 million to $50.0 million for the next twelve months. In addition to outstanding accounts payable and short-term liabilities, our planned expenditures over the next twelve months are expected to consist of expenditures relating to certain advancements of the Elk Creek Project by NioCorp’s majority owned subsidiary, ECRC, corporate overhead costs, and estimated costs related to securing financing necessary for advancement of the Elk Creek Project. As discussed below, if the Company were able to obtain additional funding, the Company would be in a position to accelerate planned expenditures ahead of its current schedule.
The planned expenditures relating to the advancement of the Elk Creek Project over the next twelve months include, but are not limited to, an updated resource and reserve estimate and associated mine plan and an updated capital cost estimate in connection with the EXIM application process. The planned corporate overhead costs over the next twelve months include Elk Creek property lease commitments, which are $57,000 through June 30, 2026, and outstanding accounts payable.
The estimated financing costs associated with the Elk Creek Project over the next twelve months include, but are not limited to, costs relating to the EXIM application process, the scope of which remains under discussion with EXIM. On June 6, 2023, the Company announced that it had submitted an application to EXIM for up to $800 million in debt financing (the “EXIM Financing”) to fund the project costs for the Elk Creek Project, under EXIM’s “Make More in America” initiative. The EXIM Financing is subject to, among other matters, the satisfactory completion of due diligence, the negotiation and settlement of final terms, and the negotiation of definitive documentation. There can be no assurance that the EXIM Financing will be completed on the terms described herein or at all. The Company was informed that its application received approval by the first of three reviews by the EXIM Transaction Review Committee (the “TRC”) on October 2, 2023. During the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2025, EXIM continued to process the Company’s application for debt financing under EXIM’s Make More in America Program. The Company’s application sits at the TRC in the second step in EXIM’s four-step approval process. The Company continues to meet with EXIM as well as providing responses to requests for additional information from EXIM and to the consultants that are conducting due diligence on the Company’s application on behalf of EXIM. As part of the diligence process, EXIM has identified additional project activities to be undertaken, including, among other things, an updated mine plan and updated Elk Creek Project capital costs on a final or close-to-final basis reflecting updated process flows. However, there can be no assurance what further project activities or matters EXIM may request in connection with the application process. We are currently unable to estimate how long the application process may take, and there can be no assurances that we will be able to successfully negotiate a final commitment of debt financing from EXIM.
On July 18, 2025, the Company closed a public offering (the “July 2025 Offering”), pursuant to which the Company issued and sold 13,850,000 Common Shares at a public offering price of $3.25 per Common Share, for net proceeds of approximately $41.8 million after deducting placement agent fees discounts and prior to other offering expenses. Maxim acted as sole placement agent for the July 2025 Offering. The Company intends to use the net proceeds from the July 2025 Offering for working capital and general corporate purposes, including to advance its efforts to launch construction of the Elk Creek Project and move it to commercial operation. During the period from July 1, 2025 through September 11, 2025, the Company also issued 5,000,312 Common Shares through the exercise of Warrants and Options by their holders, and received cash totaling approximately $10.4 million.
On August 4, 2025, ECRC entered into the DoD Agreement with ATI, an entity acting on behalf of the Defense Industrial Base Consortium under the authority of the DoD. Subject to the terms and conditions of the DoD
48
Agreement, ECRC is entitled to receive up to an aggregate of approximately $10.0 million of reimbursement payments from the DoD upon the achievement of certain project milestones related to feasibility study-level engineering and additional reserve drilling, as well as preparing updated cost estimates, for the Elk Creek Project.
We expect to use our cash balance as of June 30, 2025, as well as the proceeds from the July 2025 Offering, the proceeds from the Warrant exercise issuances, and the reimbursement payments pursuant to the DoD Agreement, to fund our planned expenditures for the next twelve months. However, additional work is required in order to advance the Elk Creek Project, requiring additional financing. The S-K 1300 Elk Creek Technical Report Summary includes an estimated total upfront capital expenditure for the Elk Creek Project of approximately $1,141.0 million. The actual amount of capital expenditure required to successfully achieve commercial production at the Elk Creek Project is subject to, among other factors, the timing and actual cost of further exploration, preparing feasibility studies, permitting, engineering and the construction of infrastructure, mining and processing facilities. If the Company were able to obtain additional funding, the Company would be in a position to accelerate planned expenditures ahead of its current schedule. In addition, to the extent that EXIM requests further project activities to be undertaken in connection with the diligence process, the Company would require additional funding to complete such activities. The Company’s ability to continue operations and fund our current work plan is dependent on management’s ability to secure additional financing. When available, the Yorkville Equity Facility Financing Agreement provides an opportunity to actively manage the cash needs of the Company more closely, and the Company may also utilize the Yorkville Equity Facility Financing Agreement to potentially generate funds at a time when they are in need. Alternatively, the Company can also utilize the Yorkville Equity Facility Financing Agreement for opportunistic share sales. However, the Yorkville Equity Facility Financing Agreement will expire by its terms on April 1, 2026.
Except for the potential funding from advances under the Yorkville Equity Facility Financing Agreement, as discussed above, and the potential exercise of Options and Warrants, we currently have no further funding commitments or arrangements for additional financing at this time. Management currently anticipates that it will fund the upfront capital expenditure amount for the Elk Creek Project through a combination of debt and equity financing, with approximately two-thirds of such amount being funded from the net proceeds of debt financing, including the amount of debt that would be represented by the EXIM Financing, if any. Management is actively pursuing additional sources of debt and equity financing to meet its long-term funding requirements, and while it has been successful in doing so in the past, there is no assurance that we will be able to obtain any such additional financing on acceptable terms, if at all. Pursuant to the Exchange Agreement, NioCorp is restricted from issuing equity or equity-linked securities (other than Common Shares) or any preferred equity or non-voting equity if such issuance would adversely impact the rights of the holders of the shares of Class B common stock of ECRC, without the consent of the holders of a majority of the shares of Class B common stock of ECRC. On July 17, 2025, we entered into the Placement Agency Agreement with Maxim, which also contains certain covenants that, among other things, limit NioCorp’s ability to enter into any variable rate transaction on or before September 17, 2025, including issuances of equity or debt securities that are convertible into Common Shares at variable rates and any equity line of credit, ATM agreement, or other continuous offering of Common Shares, other than with Maxim, subject to certain exceptions. Notwithstanding the restrictions set forth in the Exchange Agreement and the Placement Agency Agreement, there is significant uncertainty that we would be able to secure any additional financing in the current equity or debt markets. The quantity of funds to be raised and the terms of any proposed equity or debt financing that may be undertaken will be negotiated by management as opportunities to raise funds arise. Management may pursue funding sources of both debt and equity financing, including but not limited to the issuance of equity securities in the form of Common Shares, Warrants, subscription receipts, or any combination thereof in units of the Company pursuant to private placements to accredited investors or pursuant to public offerings in the form of underwritten/brokered offerings, registered direct offerings, or other forms of equity financing and public or private issuances of debt securities, including secured and unsecured convertible debt instruments, or secured debt project financing. Management does not currently know the terms pursuant to which such financings may be completed in the future, but any such financings will be negotiated at arm’s-length. Future financings involving the issuance of equity securities or derivatives thereof will likely be completed at a discount to the then-current market price of the Company’s securities and will likely be dilutive to current shareholders. In addition, we could raise funds through the sale of interests in our mineral properties, although current market conditions and other recent worldwide events have substantially reduced the number of potential buyers/acquirers of any such interests. However, we cannot provide any assurances that we will be able to be successful in raising such funds.
49
Based on the conditions described within, management has concluded and the audit opinion and notes that accompany our consolidated financial statements for the year ended June 30, 2025, disclose that substantial doubt exists as to our ability to continue as a going concern. The consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K have been prepared under the assumption that we will continue as a going concern. As defined under S-K 1300, we are a development stage issuer, and we have incurred losses since our inception. The Company will require additional capital to meet its long-term operating requirements. Uncertainty in capital markets, supply chain disruptions, increased interest rates and inflation, and the potential for geographic recessions have contributed to general global economic uncertainty. During fiscal year 2025, these events continued to create uncertainty with respect to overall project funding and timelines. We believe that the going concern uncertainty cannot be alleviated with confidence until the Company has entered into a business climate where funding of its planned ongoing operating activities is secured. Therefore, these factors raise substantial doubt as to our ability to continue as a going concern.
We have no exposure to any asset-backed commercial paper. Other than cash held by our subsidiaries for their immediate operating needs in Colorado and Nebraska, all of our cash reserves are on deposit with major U.S. and Canadian chartered banks. We do not believe that the credit, liquidity, or market risks with respect thereto have increased as a result of the current market conditions. However, in order to achieve greater security for the preservation of our capital, we have, of necessity, been required to accept lower rates of interest, which has also lowered our potential interest income.
Operating Activities
During the year ended June 30, 2025, the Company’s operating activities consumed $10.7 million of cash (2024: $11.7 million). Overall, operational outflows during fiscal year 2025 decreased from the corresponding period of 2024 primarily due to the timing of vendor payments. Going forward, the Company’s working capital requirements are expected to increase substantially in connection with the development of the Elk Creek Project.
Investing Activities
The Company had minimal investing activities during the years ended June 30, 2025 and 2024, respectively.
Financing Activities
Net cash provided by financing activities was $34.2 million in fiscal year 2025 (2024: $11.4 million). This increase in financing inflows primarily reflects the timing of cash inflows from the financing transactions disclosed above under “Liquidity and Capital Resources.”
Cash Flow Considerations
The Company has historically relied upon debt and equity financing to finance its activities. Subject to the restrictions set forth in the Exchange Agreement, the Company may pursue additional debt and/or equity financing in the medium term; however, there can be no assurance the Company will be able to obtain any required financing in the future on acceptable terms.
The Company has limited financial resources compared to its proposed expenditures, no source of operating income, and no assurance that additional funding will be available to it for current or future projects, although the Company has been successful in the past in financing its activities through the sale of equity securities.
The ability of the Company to arrange additional financing in the future will depend, in part, on the prevailing capital market conditions, and its success in developing the Elk Creek Project. Any quoted market for the Common Shares may be subject to market trends generally, notwithstanding any potential success of the Company in creating revenue, cash flows, or earnings, and any depression of the trading price of the Common Shares could impact its ability to obtain equity financing on acceptable terms.
Historically, the Company has used net proceeds from issuances of Common Shares to provide sufficient funds to meet its near-term exploration and development plans and other contractual obligations when due. However, development and construction of the Elk Creek Project will require substantial additional capital resources. This
50
includes near-term funding and, ultimately, funding for Elk Creek Project construction and other costs. See “Liquidity and Capital Resources” above, for the Company’s discussion of arrangements related to possible future financings.
Environmental
Our mining and exploration activities are subject to various federal and state laws and regulations governing the protection of the environment. We have made, and expect to make in the future, expenditures to comply with such laws and regulations, but cannot predict the full amount of such future expenditures. As of June 30, 2025 and 2024, we had accrued $48,000 and $48,000, respectively, related to estimated environmental obligations.
Forward-Looking Statements
The foregoing discussion and analysis, as well as certain information contained elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, contain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act and Section 21E of the Exchange Act, and are intended to be covered by the safe harbor created thereby. See the discussion in “Forward-Looking Statements” in Item 1., “Business.”
Accounting Developments
For a discussion of Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements and Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements, see Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Critical Accounting Estimates and Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Our significant accounting policies are described in Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. As described in Note 3, we are required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts and related disclosures of assets, liabilities, revenue, and expenses. Our estimates are based on our experience and our interpretation of economic, political, regulatory, and other factors that affect our business prospects. Many of the inputs into our estimation process are subjective and are subject to uncertainty over time and therefore, actual results may differ significantly from our estimates. Note 3 also discloses recent accounting pronouncements applicable to the Company.
We believe that our most critical accounting estimates are related to the carrying value of our long term assets; accounting for income taxes and the valuation of deferred tax assets; and the valuation of liabilities associated with Warrants, convertible debt carried at fair value, and Earnout Shares, as they require us to make assumptions that are highly uncertain at the time the accounting estimates are made and changes in them are reasonably likely to occur from period to period. Management has discussed the development and selection of these critical accounting estimates with the Audit Committee of our Board (the “Audit Committee”), and the Audit Committee has reviewed the disclosures presented below. In addition, there are other items within our financial statements that require estimation, but are not deemed to be critical. However, changes in estimates used in these and other items could have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
Carrying Value of Long-Lived Assets
The recoverability of the carrying values of mineral properties is dependent upon economic reserves being discovered or developed on the properties, permitting, financing, start-up, and commercial production from, or the sale/lease of, or other strategic transactions related to these properties. Development and/or start-up of a project will depend on, among other things, management’s ability to raise sufficient capital for these purposes. We assess the carrying cost of our mineral properties for impairment whenever information or circumstances indicate the potential for impairment. Key inputs include events and circumstances such as our inability to obtain all the necessary permits, changes in the legal status of our mineral properties, government actions, the results of exploration activities and technical evaluations and changes in economic conditions, including the price of commodities or input prices. Many of these inputs are subjective and are subject to uncertainty over time. Such evaluations compare estimated future net cash flows with our carrying costs and future obligations on an undiscounted basis. If it is determined that the estimated future undiscounted cash flows are less than the carrying value of the property, an impairment loss will be recorded, measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets. Where
51
estimates of future net cash flows are not determinable and where other conditions indicate the potential for impairment, management uses available market information and/or third-party valuation experts to assess if the carrying value can be recovered and to estimate fair value.
We review and evaluate our long-lived assets, other than mineral properties, for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the related carrying amounts may not be recoverable. An impairment loss is measured and recorded based on the estimated fair value of the long-lived assets being tested for impairment and their carrying amounts.
Income Taxes
We have assets, hold interests, and conduct activities in the U.S. and Canada and are subject to their tax regimes. Tax laws are complex and continue to evolve. While we have a history of losses, our assumptions made in tax returns are subject to review and interpretation by taxing authorities and could be modified. Management judgment is required in determining our provision for income taxes, our deferred tax assets and liabilities, and any valuation allowance recorded against our deferred tax assets. We consider factors such as the cumulative income or loss in recent years; reversal of deferred tax liabilities; projected future taxable income exclusive of temporary differences; the character of the income tax asset, including income tax positions; tax planning strategies and the period over which we expect the deferred tax assets to be recovered in the determination of the valuation allowance. In the event that actual results differ from these estimates or we adjust our estimates in the future, we may need to adjust our valuation allowance, which could materially impact our financial position and results of operations.
Financial Instruments Carried at Fair Value
The fair values of our Earnout Shares, private Warrants, Contingent Consent Warrants, and convertible debt carried at fair value were determined using various significant unobservable inputs, including a discount rate and our best estimate of expected volatility and expected holding periods. Changes in the estimated fair values of these liabilities may have material impacts on our results of operations in any given period, as any increases in these liabilities have a corresponding negative impact on our U.S. GAAP results of operations. See Notes 8, 9, and 10c to our consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional details.
Other
The Company has one class of shares, being Common Shares. A summary of outstanding Common Shares, Vested Shares, Options, and Warrants as of September 11, 2025, is set out below, on a fully diluted basis.
Common Shares Outstanding (fully diluted) |
||||
| Common Shares | 77,757,089 | |||
| Vested Shares(1) | 3,518,450 | |||
| Options(2) | 4,900,000 | |||
| Warrants(3) | 24,787,533 |
| (1) | Each exchangeable into one Common Share at any time, and from time to time, until the tenth anniversary of the Closing Date. |
| (2) | Each exercisable for one Common Share. |
| (3) | Includes 15,666,626 NioCorp Assumed Warrants that are each exercisable for 1.11829212 Common Shares, and 9,120,907 Warrants that are each exercisable into one Common Share. |
| ITEM 7A. | QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK |
Interest rate risk
The Company’s exposure to changes in market interest rates, relates primarily to the Company’s earned interest income on cash deposits and short-term investments. The Company maintains a balance between the liquidity of cash assets and the interest rate return thereon. The carrying amount of financial assets, net of any provisions for losses, represents the Company’s maximum exposure to credit risk.
52
Foreign currency exchange risk
The Company incurs expenditures in both U.S. and Canadian dollars. Canadian dollar expenditures are primarily related to engineering and metallurgical expenses, as well as certain professional services. As a result, currency exchange fluctuations may impact the costs of our operating activities. To reduce this risk, we maintain sufficient cash balances in Canadian dollars to fund expected near-term expenditures.
Commodity price risk
The Company is exposed to commodity price risk related to the elements associated with the Elk Creek Project. A significant decrease in the global demand for these elements may have a material adverse effect on our business. The Elk Creek Project is not in production, and the Company does not currently hold any commodity derivative positions.
| ITEM 8. | FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA |
53
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the shareholders and the Board of Directors of NioCorp Developments Ltd.
Opinion on the Financial Statements
Going Concern
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 4 to the financial statements, the Company has an accumulated deficit and does not generate any revenue. Further, the Company does not have sufficient cash on hand to fund normal operations as well as the construction necessary for mine development for the next twelve months. These conditions raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 4. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audit, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
Our audit included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audit also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Critical Audit Matter
The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current-period audit of the financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.
54
Warrants issued in the current year and classified as equity— Refer to Notes 3 and 10 to the financial statements
Critical Audit Matter Description
On September 17, 2024, November 5, 2024, January 31, 2025, and April 17, 2025, the Company issued warrants, which Management determined would be classified as equity when issued to investors or lenders, collectively referred to as the “Warrants”.
For warrants issued to investors or lenders in exchange for cash or other financial assets, Management follows guidance issued within ASC 480, Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity, and ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging, to assist in the determination of whether the warrants should be classified as liabilities or equity. Warrants that are determined to require equity classification are measured at fair value upon issuance and are not subsequently remeasured unless they are required to be reclassified.
Given the significant assumptions made by management in determining the accounting classification for the Warrants, performing audit procedures to evaluate the reasonableness of management's conclusions required a high degree of auditor judgment and an increased extent of effort, including the need to involve professionals with expertise in accounting for complex financial instruments.
How the Critical Audit Matter Was Addressed in the Audit
Our audit procedures related to the Warrants included the following, among others:
| ● | We evaluated management’s accounting position through the following procedures: |
| ○ | Obtained and evaluated the Company’s accounting memoranda regarding the application of the relevant accounting guidance for the Warrants. |
| ○ | Obtained, read and compared the underlying terms and conditions of the relevant contracts to the Company’s accounting memoranda and evaluated management’s identification of significant terms and conditions. |
| ○ | Evaluated the Company’s conclusions regarding the accounting treatment applied to the transactions with the assistance of professionals with expertise in accounting for complex financial instruments. |
| ● | Evaluated the completeness and accuracy of the disclosures related to the Warrants. |
/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
September 11, 2025
We have served as the Company’s auditor since fiscal year 2024.
55
NioCorp Developments Ltd.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share data)
| As of June 30, | ||||||||
| 2025 | 2024 | |||||||
| ASSETS | ||||||||
| Current | ||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | $ | ||||||
| Prepaid expenses and other | ||||||||
| Total current assets | ||||||||
| Non-current | ||||||||
| Deposits | ||||||||
| Investment in equity securities | ||||||||
| Right-of-use assets | ||||||||
| Land and buildings, net | ||||||||
| Mineral properties | ||||||||
| Total assets | $ | $ | ||||||
| LIABILITIES | ||||||||
| Current | ||||||||
| Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | $ | $ | ||||||
| Warrant liabilities, at fair value | ||||||||
| Convertible debt | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability | ||||||||
| Total current liabilities | ||||||||
| Non-current | ||||||||
| Warrant liabilities, at fair value | ||||||||
| Earnout liability, at fair value | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability | ||||||||
| Total liabilities | ||||||||
| Commitments and contingencies | ||||||||
| Redeemable noncontrolling interest | ||||||||
| SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY | ||||||||
| Common stock, par value, shares authorized; and shares outstanding, respectively | ||||||||
| Accumulated deficit | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Accumulated other comprehensive loss | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Total shareholders’ equity | ||||||||
| Total liabilities, redeemable noncontrolling interest, and shareholders’ equity | $ | $ | ||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements
56
NioCorp Developments Ltd.
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss
(expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data)
| For the year ended June 30, | ||||||||
| 2025 | 2024 | |||||||
| Operating expenses | ||||||||
| Employee related costs | $ | $ | ||||||
| Professional fees | ||||||||
| Exploration expenditures | ||||||||
| Other operating expenses | ||||||||
| Total operating expenses | ||||||||
| Change in fair value of earnout shares liability | ( | ) | ||||||
| Change in fair value of warrant liabilities | ( | ) | ||||||
| Change in fair value of convertible notes | ||||||||
| Interest expense | ||||||||
| Foreign exchange gain | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Interest income | ( | ) | ||||||
| Other gains | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Loss on equity securities | ||||||||
| Loss before income taxes | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Income tax benefit | ( | ) | ||||||
| Net loss and comprehensive loss | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Net loss attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interest | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Net loss and net comprehensive loss attributable to the Company | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | ||
| Loss per common share, basic and diluted | $ | ) | $ | ) | ||||
| Weighted average common shares outstanding | ||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements
57
NioCorp Developments Ltd.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars)
| For the year ended June 30, | ||||||||
| 2025 | 2024 | |||||||
| CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES | ||||||||
| Net loss for the period | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | ||
| Adjustments for: | ||||||||
| Change in valuation of earnout shares liability | ( | ) | ||||||
| Change in valuation of warrant liabilities | ( | ) | ||||||
| Change in fair value of convertible note | ||||||||
| Accretion of convertible debt | ||||||||
| Share-based compensation | ||||||||
| Yorkville share issuances | ||||||||
| Fair value of insider warrants | ||||||||
| Depreciation | ||||||||
| Unrealized loss on equity securities | ||||||||
| Noncash lease activity | ( | ) | ||||||
| Other gains | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||
| Change in working capital items: | ||||||||
| Prepaid expenses | ( | ) | ||||||
| Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Net cash used in operating activities | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES | ||||||||
| Acquisition of fixed assets | ( | ) | ||||||
| Deposits | ( | ) | ||||||
| Net cash used in investing activities | ( | ) | ||||||
| CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES | ||||||||
| Proceeds from issuance of common stock | ||||||||
| Issuance of debt, net of costs | ||||||||
| Related party debt draws | ||||||||
| Related party debt repayments | ( | ) | ||||||
| Debt repayments | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Share issue costs | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Net cash provided by financing activities | ||||||||
| Change in cash and cash equivalents during period | ( | ) | ||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period | ||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents, end of period | $ | $ | ||||||
| Supplemental cash flow information: | ||||||||
| Amounts paid for interest | $ | $ | ||||||
| Non-cash investing and financing transactions: | ||||||||
| Conversion of debt for common shares | $ | $ | ||||||
| Value of Warrants issued | ||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements
58
NioCorp Developments Ltd.
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity and Redeemable Noncontrolling Interest
(expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share data)
Common Shares Outstanding | Common Stock | Accumulated Deficit | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss | Total | Redeemable Noncontrolling Interest | |||||||||||||||||||
| Balance, June 30, 2023 | $ | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | $ | |||||||||||||
| Equity placements | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Yorkville equity facility draws | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Option exercises | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Redemption of vested shares | ( | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Debt conversions | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Option liability valuations | - | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Share issuance costs | - | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Share-based compensation | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Loss for the year | - | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||||
| Balance, June 30, 2024 | $ | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | $ | $ | |||||||||||||||
| Equity placements | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Yorkville equity facility draws | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Warrant exercises | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Option exercises | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Redemption of vested shares | ( | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Debt conversions | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Issuance of Lind Consent warrants | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Conversion of private warrants | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Share issuance costs | - | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Share-based compensation | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Loss for the year | - | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||||
| Balance, June 30, 2025 | $ | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | $ | $ | |||||||||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements
59
NioCorp Developments Ltd.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
June 30, 2025
(expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data or as otherwise stated)
| 1. | DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS |
NioCorp Developments Ltd. (the “Company” or “NioCorp”) was incorporated on February 27, 1987, under the laws of the Province of British Columbia and currently operates in reportable operating segment consisting of exploration and development of mineral deposits in the United States, specifically, the Elk Creek Niobium/Scandium/Titanium property (the “Elk Creek Project”) located in southeastern Nebraska.
On March 17, 2023 (the “Closing Date”), the Company closed a series of transactions (the “GXII Transaction”), pursuant to the Business Combination Agreement, dated September 25, 2022 (the “Business Combination Agreement”), among the Company, GX Acquisition Corp. II (“GXII”), and Big Red Merger Sub Ltd (the “Closing”). At the Closing, the Company also closed convertible debt financings (the “Yorkville Convertible Debt Financing”) with YA II PN, Ltd., an investment fund managed by Yorkville Advisors Global, LP (together with YA II PN, Ltd., “Yorkville”), and the standby equity purchase facility with Yorkville (the “Yorkville Equity Facility Financing” and, together with the Yorkville Convertible Debt Financing, the “Yorkville Financings”) became effective. The transactions contemplated by the Business Combination Agreement, including the GXII Transaction, the Yorkville Financings and a 10-for-1 reverse stock split consummated in connection with the Closing, are referred to, collectively, as the “2023 Transactions.”
The Company currently earns no operating revenues and will require additional capital in order to advance the Elk Creek Project to construction and commercial operation. As further discussed in Note 4, these matters raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern, and the Company is dependent upon the generation of profits from mineral properties, obtaining additional financing, and maintaining continued support from its shareholders and creditors.
| 2. | BASIS OF PREPARATION |
| a) | Basis of Preparation and Consolidation |
These consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles of the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) and the rules and regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. The consolidated financial statements include the consolidated accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries with all significant intercompany transactions eliminated. Certain transactions include reference to Canadian dollars (“C$”) where applicable.
These consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and the subsidiaries listed in the following table. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated.
| Subsidiary | Jurisdiction of incorporation | Ownership at June 30, | |
| 2025 | 2024 | ||
| 0896800 BC Ltd. (“0896800”) | |||
| Elk Creek Resources Corp. (“ECRC”) (1) | |||
| NioCorp Technologies Limited | |||
| (1) |
| b) | Use of Estimates |
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements, and the reported amounts of expenses during the reporting period. The Company regularly evaluates estimates and assumptions related to the valuation of mineral properties, deferred income tax asset valuations, convertible debt valuations, earnout valuation, derivative liabilities, warrant liabilities, and share-based compensation. The Company bases its estimates and assumptions on current facts, historical experience, and various other factors that it believes to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the other sources. The actual results experienced by the Company may differ materially and adversely from the Company’s
60
NioCorp Developments Ltd.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
June 30, 2025
(expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data or as otherwise stated)
estimates. To the extent there are material differences between estimates and the actual results, future results of operations will be affected.
| 3. | SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES |
| a) | Development Stage Issuer |
The Company is considered to be a development stage issuer under Subpart 1300 of Regulation S-K of the United States Securities Act of 1933, as amended (“S-K 1300”), and it devotes substantially all of its efforts to acquiring and exploring mining interests that management believes should eventually provide sufficient net profits to sustain the Company’s existence. Until such interests are engaged in commercial production, the Company will continue to seek additional funding to support the completion of its exploration and development activities. The Company’s activities are subject to significant risks and uncertainties, including its ability to secure sufficient funding to continue operations, to obtain proven and probable reserves, to comply with industry regulations and obtain permits necessary for development of the Elk Creek Project, as well as environmental risks and market conditions.
| b) | Cash and Cash Equivalents |
Cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand, cash in banks, investments in certificates of deposit with original maturities of 90 days or less, and money market funds. The Company maintains the majority of its cash balances with two financial institutions. Accounts at banks in the United States (“U.S.”) are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) up to $250, while accounts at banks in Canada are insured by the Canada Deposit Insurance Corporation (“CDIC”) up to C$100. At June 30, 2025, the Company had $24,711 and $22 in excess of the FDIC and CDIC insured limits, respectively.
| c) | Foreign Currency Translation |
Functional and reporting currency
Items included in the financial statements of each of the Company’s entities are measured using the currency of the primary economic environment in which the entity operates (“the functional currency”). The functional currency for all entities is the U.S. Dollar except for NioCorp Technologies Limited, which is measured in British Pounds.
The reporting currency for these consolidated financial statements is U.S. dollars.
Transactions in foreign currency
Transactions made in a currency other than the functional currency are remeasured to the functional currency at exchange rates at the dates of the transactions. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies at the reporting date are remeasured to the functional currency at the exchange rate at that date and non-monetary assets and liabilities are remeasured at historical rates. Foreign currency translation gains and losses are included in profit or loss.
Translation to reporting currency
Translation gains and losses from the application of the U.S. dollar as the reporting currency, if any, are included as part of cumulative currency translation adjustment, which is reported as a component of shareholders’ equity under accumulated other comprehensive loss.
| d) | Mineral Properties |
Mineral property acquisition costs, including indirectly related acquisition costs, are capitalized when incurred. Acquisition costs include cash consideration and the fair market value of common shares, no par value, of the Company (“Common Shares”) issued as consideration. Properties acquired under option agreements, whereby payments are made at the sole discretion of the Company, are capitalized as mineral property acquisition costs at such time as the payments are made. Exploration costs are expensed as incurred. When it is determined that a mining deposit can be economically and legally extracted or produced based on established proven and probable reserves under S-K 1300, and the Company’s board of directors (the “Board”) has approved the commencement of formal development activities, development costs related to such reserves and incurred after such board approval will be considered for capitalization. The establishment of proven and probable reserves is based on
61
NioCorp Developments Ltd.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
June 30, 2025
(expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data or as otherwise stated)
results of feasibility studies, which indicate whether a property is economically feasible. Upon commencement of commercial production, capitalized costs will be amortized over their estimated useful lives or units of production, whichever is a more reliable measure. Capitalized amounts relating to a property that is abandoned or otherwise considered uneconomic for the foreseeable future are written off.
The
recoverability of the carrying values of mineral properties is dependent upon economic reserves being discovered or developed
on the properties, permitting, financing, start-up, and commercial production from, or the sale/lease of, or other strategic transactions
related to these properties. Development and/or start-up of a project will depend on, among other things, management’s ability
to raise sufficient capital for these purposes. We assess the carrying cost of our mineral properties for impairment whenever
information or circumstances indicate the potential for impairment. This would include events and circumstances such as our inability
to obtain all the necessary permits, changes in the legal status of our mineral properties, government actions, the results of
exploration activities and technical evaluations and changes in economic conditions, including the price of commodities or input
prices. Such evaluations compare estimated future net cash flows with our carrying costs and future obligations on an undiscounted
basis. If it is determined that the estimated future undiscounted cash flows are less than the carrying value of the property,
an impairment loss will be recorded. Where estimates of future net cash flows are not determinable and where other conditions
indicate the potential for impairment, management uses available market information and/or third-party valuation experts to assess
if the carrying value can be recovered and to estimate fair value. There was
| e) | Long Lived Assets |
Long-lived
assets, other than mineral properties, held and used by the Company are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. For purposes of evaluating the recoverability
of long-lived assets, the recoverability test is performed using undiscounted net cash flows related to the long-lived assets.
If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount
of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets. Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of the carrying amount
or fair value less costs to sell. There was
| f) | Leases |
Under Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 842, Leases, we determine if a contractual arrangement is, or contains, a lease at the inception date. Right-of-use (“ROU”) assets and liabilities related to operating leases are separately reported in the consolidated balance sheets. The Company currently has no finance leases.
ROU assets and lease liabilities are recognized at the lease commencement date based on the present value of the future lease payments over the lease term. When the rate implicit to the lease cannot be readily determined, we utilize our incremental borrowing rate in determining the present value of the future lease payments. The incremental borrowing rate is derived from information available at the lease commencement date and represents the rate of interest that a lessee would have to pay to borrow an amount equal to the lease payments on a collateralized basis over a similar term in a similar economic environment. Operating lease ROU assets also include any cumulative prepaid or accrued rent when the lease payments are uneven throughout the lease term. The ROU assets and lease liabilities may include options to extend or terminate the lease when it is reasonably certain that we will exercise that option.
Lease liabilities are increased by interest and reduced by payments each period, and the ROU asset is amortized over the lease term. For operating leases, interest on the lease liability and the amortization of the ROU asset result in straight-line rent expense over the lease term. Variable lease expenses are recorded when incurred.
| g) | Convertible Debt Carried at Fair Value |
With regard to the Company’s debt related to the convertible promissory notes issued in April 2024 (as further discussed in Note 8), the Company has elected to account for these notes at fair value per the provisions of ASC Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging (“ASC 815”). Under ASC 815-15-25, an election can be taken at the inception of a financial instrument to account for the instrument at fair value. The notes were recorded at fair value at inception and assessed quarterly thereafter using a Monte Carlo simulation methodology which
62
NioCorp Developments Ltd.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
June 30, 2025
(expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data or as otherwise stated)
incorporates multiple conversion scenarios. All changes in fair value subsequent to the initial recording, excluding the impact of the change in fair value related to the Company’s own credit risk, are recorded as a component of non-operating income/expense, within Change in fair value of convertible debt in the consolidated statements of operations. Changes in fair value related to the Company’s own credit risk, if any, are recorded through other comprehensive loss.
| h) | Warrants |
We apply relevant accounting guidance for warrants to purchase our Common Shares (“Warrants”) based on the nature of the relationship with the counterparty. The Company has made an accounting policy election that the “greater of” Share-Price Input to the Black-Scholes Value would not preclude equity classification. The Company has not had any historical transactions that include the “greater of” Share-Price Input feature, and this is a new accounting policy election as of the current fiscal year. For Warrants issued to investors or lenders in exchange for cash or other financial assets, we follow guidance issued within ASC 480, Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity, and ASC 815, to assist in the determination of whether the Warrants should be classified as liabilities or equity. The fair value of Warrants is estimated using Black Scholes modeling or Monte Carlo modeling, depending on the settlement features embedded in the Warrant. Inputs under both models include inputs such as NioCorp’s Common Share price, the risk-free interest rate, the expected term, the volatility, and the dividend rate. Warrants that are determined to require liability classifications are measured at fair value upon issuance and are subsequently remeasured to their then fair value at each subsequent reporting period with changes in fair value recorded in current earnings. Warrants that are determined to require equity classifications measured at fair value upon issuance and are not subsequently remeasured unless they are required to be reclassified.
| i) | Earnout Shares |
Earnout Shares are classified as a liability due to failure to meet the equity classification criteria under ASC 815-40. The Earnout Shares are measured at fair value upon issuance and subsequently remeasured at each reporting period using a Monte Carlo simulation methodology, which includes inputs such as NioCorp’s Common Share price, the risk-free interest rate, the expected term, the weighted average of historical Common Share volatility and implied volatility underlying the Company’s publicly traded Warrants, the dividend rate, the conversion price, and the number of Earnout Shares outstanding. Assumptions used in the model are subjective and require significant judgment.
| j) | Financial Instruments |
The Company’s financial instruments consist of cash and cash equivalents, receivables, equity securities, and accounts payable and accrued liabilities. It is management’s opinion that the Company is not exposed to significant interest, currency or credit risks arising from its financial instruments. The fair values of these instruments approximate their carrying value unless otherwise noted.
| k) | Concentration of Credit Risk |
The financial instrument which potentially subjects the Company to credit risk is cash and cash equivalents, The Company holds investments or maintains available cash primarily in two commercial banks located in Vancouver, British Columbia and Columbus, Ohio. As part of its cash management process, the Company regularly monitors the relative credit standing of these institutions.
| l) | Asset Retirement Obligation |
The
Company is subject to various government laws and regulations relating to environmental disturbances caused by exploration and
evaluation activities. The estimated costs associated with environmental remediation obligations are accrued in the period in
which the liability is incurred if it is reasonably estimable or known. Until such time that a project life is established, the
Company records the corresponding cost as an exploration stage expense and has accrued $
Future reclamation and environmental-related expenditures are difficult to estimate in many circumstances due to the early-stage nature of the Elk Creek Project, the uncertainties associated with defining the nature and extent of environmental disturbance, the application of laws and regulations by regulatory authorities and changes in reclamation or remediation technology. The Company periodically reviews accrued liabilities for such reclamation and remediation costs as evidence indicating that the liabilities have potentially changed becomes available. Changes in estimates are reflected in the consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive loss in the period an estimate is revised.
63
NioCorp Developments Ltd.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
June 30, 2025
(expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data or as otherwise stated)
| m) | Income Taxes |
Income taxes are provided based upon the liability method of accounting pursuant to ASC 740-10-25, “Income Taxes – Recognition.” Under the approach, deferred income taxes are recorded to reflect the tax consequences in future years of differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and their financial reporting amounts at each year-end. A valuation allowance is recorded against deferred tax assets if management does not believe the Company has met the “more likely than not” standard imposed by ASC 740-10-25-5 to allow recognition of such an asset. ASC 740-10-50, “Income Taxes – Disclosure,” requires the Company to evaluate its income tax positions and recognize a liability for uncertain tax positions that are not more likely than not to be sustained by tax authorities. As of June 30, 2025 and 2024, the Company believes it had no income tax uncertainties that required recognition of a liability. If the Company were to determine that uncertain tax positions meet the criteria for recognition, an estimated liability and related interest and penalties would be recognized as income tax expense.
| n) | Redeemable Noncontrolling Interest |
Redeemable Noncontrolling Interest refers to non-controlling interest associated with the Vested Shares that are redeemable upon the occurrence of an event that is not solely within the Company’s control and is reported in the mezzanine section between total liabilities and shareholders’ deficit, as temporary equity in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets. The Company’s non-controlling interest is redeemable at fair value, and no adjustment to the earnings per share numerator is required because redemption at fair value is not considered an economic distribution different from other common stockholders.
| o) | Basic and Diluted Per Share Disclosure |
Basic earnings (loss) per share represents net earnings (loss) attributable to common shareholders divided by the weighted average number of Common Shares outstanding during the period. The Company considers Vested Shares and Released Earnout Shares (each as defined in Note 9), to be participating securities, requiring the use of the two-class method. Diluted earnings (loss) per share represents net earnings (loss) attributable to common shareholders divided by the weighted average number of Common Shares outstanding, inclusive of the dilutive impact of all potentially dilutive securities outstanding during the period, as applicable.
| For the year ended June 30, | ||||||||
| 2025 | 2024 | |||||||
| Net loss | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | ||
| Adjust: Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest | ||||||||
| Net loss available to participating securities | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Net loss attributable to Vested Shares | ||||||||
| Net loss attributed to common shareholders - basic and diluted | $ | ) | $ | ) | ||||
| Denominator: | ||||||||
| Weighted average shares outstanding – basic and diluted | ||||||||
| Loss per Common Share outstanding – basic and diluted | $ | ) | $ | ) | ||||
The following shares underlying options to purchase Common Shares (“Options”), Warrants, and outstanding convertible debt were antidilutive due to a net loss in the periods presented and, therefore, were excluded from the dilutive securities computation for the periods indicated below:
| For the year ended June 30, | ||||||||
| Excluded potentially dilutive securities (1)(2): | 2025 | 2024 | ||||||
| Options | ||||||||
| Warrants | ||||||||
| Convertible debt | ||||||||
| Total potentially dilutive securities | ||||||||
64
NioCorp Developments Ltd.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
June 30, 2025
(expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data or as otherwise stated)
| (1) |
| (2) |
| p) | Share Based Compensation |
The Company grants Options to directors, officers, employees, and business advisors. Option terms and vesting conditions are at the discretion of the Board. The Option exercise price is equal to the closing market price on the Nasdaq Stock Market LLC (“Nasdaq”) on the day preceding the date of the grant.
The Company estimates the fair value of Options using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The Company recognizes forfeitures as they occur.
| q) | Recent Accounting Standards |
Recently Adopted Accounting Standards
In fiscal year 2025, we adopted Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2023-07, Segment Reporting (Topic 280): Improvements to Reportable Segment Disclosures. Management has evaluated the Company’s operations and concluded it has one reportable operating segment which will now require expanded disclosure. Adoption was made retroactively with segment disclosure included for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2025 and 2024. This standard has not changed the processing, recording, or presentation of financial data, other than providing additional disclosure regarding management oversight for the Company’s single operating segment.
Issued
and Not Effective
In December 2023, the FASB issued ASU 2023-09, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures,
which includes amendments that further enhance income tax disclosures, primarily through standardization and disaggregation of
rate reconciliation categories and income taxes paid by jurisdiction. The amendments are effective for the Company’s annual
periods beginning July 1, 2025, with early adoption permitted, and should be applied either prospectively or retrospectively.
The Company is currently evaluating the ASU to determine its impact on the Company’s disclosures.
From time to time, new accounting pronouncements are issued by the FASB that are adopted by the Company as of the specified effective date. Unless otherwise discussed, management believes that the impact of recently issued standards did not or will not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements upon adoption.
| 4. | GOING CONCERN ISSUES |
The
Company incurred a net loss of $ for the year ended June 30, 2025 (2024 - $) and had an accumulated deficit of $
In
response to these conditions and events, the Company plans to obtain additional financing. As discussed in Note 17, on July 18,
2025, the Company closed a public offering which resulted in net proceeds of approximately $
65
NioCorp Developments Ltd.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
June 30, 2025
(expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data or as otherwise stated)
for additional financing as of June 30, 2025. The Company’s plans to obtain additional financing have not been finalized, are subject to market conditions, and are not within the Company’s control and therefore cannot be deemed probable. Further, the Company will be required to raise additional funds for the construction and commencement of operations. As a result, the Company has concluded that management’s plans do not alleviate substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.
| 5. | LAND AND BUILDINGS, NET |
| As of June 30, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2025 | 2024 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Cost | Accumulated Depreciation | Net | Cost | Accumulated Depreciation | Net | |||||||||||||||||||
| Land | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||||||||
| Buildings and other | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Land and buildings, net | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||||||||
| 6. | MINERAL PROPERTIES |
Mineral properties consist of original acquisition costs and purchased mineral rights related to the Elk Creek Project.
In addition to the land and mineral rights currently owned by the Company, the property interests of Elk Creek include seven prepaid mineral exploration option-to-purchase agreements which include a pre-determined buyout for permanent ownership of the mineral and/or surface rights. Terms of the agreements require no further significant payments, and the Company may terminate the leases, negotiate lease extensions, or elect to purchase the mineral and/or surface rights any time. Agreements that allow for the purchase of mineral rights contain provisions whereby the landowners would retain a 2% net smelter return.
During
the year ended June 30, 2025, the Company completed negotiations with landowners in Nebraska and entered into contract amendments
which extended the option periods by approximately five years for option to purchase agreements (“OTP”) covering six
parcels of land for project construction and operation which the Company does not already own. The Company recorded an exploration
expense for $
| 7. | ACCOUNTS PAYABLE AND ACCRUED LIABILITIES |
| As of June 30, | ||||||||
| 2025 | 2024 | |||||||
| Accounts payable, trade | $ | $ | ||||||
| Trade payable accruals | ||||||||
| Environmental accruals | ||||||||
| Loan origination fees payable to related party | ||||||||
| Total accounts payable and accrued liabilities | $ | $ | ||||||
| 8. | CONVERTIBLE DEBT |
| As of June 30, | ||||||||
| 2025 | 2024 | |||||||
| Yorkville convertible debentures | $ | $ | ||||||
| April 2024 notes | ||||||||
| Total convertible debt | $ | $ | ||||||
Yorkville Convertible Debentures
66
NioCorp Developments Ltd.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
June 30, 2025
(expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data or as otherwise stated)
On
July 19, 2024, the Company and Yorkville entered into a make-whole payment agreement under which Yorkville agreed to convert the
remaining outstanding principal and accrued interest of $
Changes in the Convertible Debentures are as follows:
| Amount | ||||
| Balance, June 30, 2023 | $ | |||
| Accretion expense | ||||
| Principal and accrued interest converted | ( | ) | ||
| Balance, June 30, 2024 | ||||
| Accretion expense | ||||
| Principal and interest converted | ( | ) | ||
| Balance, June 30, 2025 | $ | |||
The following table discloses the components of interest expense associated with the Convertible Debentures:
| For the year ended June 30, | ||||||||
| Component of Interest Expense | 2025 | 2024 | ||||||
| Amortization of discount and issuance costs | $ | $ | ||||||
| Contractual interest | ||||||||
| Total | $ | $ | ||||||
April 2024 Notes
On April 12, 2024, the Company issued and sold to Yorkville and Lind Global Fund II LP (together with Yorkville, the “April 2024 Purchasers”), $8,000 aggregate principal amount of unsecured notes (the “April 2024 Notes”), pursuant to a securities purchase agreement, dated April 11, 2024 (the “April 2024 Purchase Agreement”), between the Company and each of the April 2024 Purchasers.
The Company also issued to the April 2024 Purchasers, in proportion to the aggregate principal amount of April 2024 Notes issued to each April 2024 Purchaser, Warrants (the “April 2024 Warrants”) to purchase up to 615,385 Common Shares (the “April 2024 Warrants Shares”), which were equal to 25% of the aggregate principal amount of April 2024 Notes issued to the April 2024 Purchasers divided by the exercise price of $3.25, subject to any adjustment to give effect to any stock dividend, stock split or recapitalization. The April 2024 Warrants expire on April 12, 2027.
Pursuant to the April 2024 Purchase Agreement, the April 2024 Purchasers advanced an aggregate of $6,935 to the Company in consideration of the issuance by the Company to the April 2024 Purchasers of $8,000 aggregate principal amount of the April 2024 Notes and April 2024 Warrants.
Under the terms of the April 2024 Notes, subject to certain exceptions, on the first day of each calendar month, beginning on June 1, 2024 (excluding August 2024) (the “Payment Date”), the Company was required to repay a portion of the outstanding balance of all of the April 2024 Notes, on a pro-rata basis, in an amount equal to the sum of (i) $1,400 of principal (or the outstanding principal if less than such amount) in the aggregate among all of the outstanding Notes, plus (ii) 8.0% of the principal amount being paid (the “Payment Premium”), and (iii) accrued and unpaid interest, if any, as of the Payment Date. The Company was required to make payments on each Payment Date until the entire outstanding principal was repaid but did not have an obligation to make a payment on a Payment Date if certain equity conditions were satisfied.
67
NioCorp Developments Ltd.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
June 30, 2025
(expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data or as otherwise stated)
Subject to certain limitations contained within the April 2024 Notes, holders of the April 2024 Notes were entitled to convert the principal amount of, accrued and unpaid interest, if any, and any Payment Premium that has become due and payable on each April 2024 Note, from time to time over their term, into a number of Common Shares equal to the quotient of the amount being converted divided by a fixed conversion price of $2.75 per Common Share up to a maximum of 3,141,817 Common Shares (together with the April 2024 Warrant Shares, the “April 2024 Underlying Shares”). The terms of the April 2024 Notes restricted the conversion of the April 2024 Notes by a holder if such a conversion would have caused such holder to exceed certain ownership thresholds in the Company.
The April 2024 Notes were the unsecured obligations of the Company and were originally scheduled to mature on December 31, 2024. The April 2024 Notes incurred a simple interest rate obligation of 0.0% per annum (which would have increased to 18.0% per annum upon the occurrence of an event of default).
The April 2024 Notes were also redeemable at the Company’s option at any time and from time to time over their term at a redemption price equal to the principal amount being redeemed, plus the Payment Premium, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, as of the redemption date.
The April 2024 Notes contained events of default customary for instruments of their type (with customer grace periods, as applicable) and provided that, upon the occurrence of an event of default arising from certain events of bankruptcy or insolvency with respect to the Company, all outstanding April 2024 Notes would become due and payable immediately without further action or notice. If any other type of event of default occurred and continued, then any holder could have declared all of its April 2024 Notes to be due and payable immediately.
The April 2024 Purchase Agreement contained customary representations, warranties, conditions and indemnification obligations by each party. The representations, warranties and covenants contained in the April 2024 Purchase Agreement were made only for purposes of the April 2024 Purchase Agreement and as of specific dates, were solely for the benefit of the parties to such agreement and are subject to certain important limitations.
The April 2024 Purchase Agreement also contained certain covenants that, among other things, limited NioCorp’s ability to use the proceeds from the April 2024 Purchase Agreement to repay related party debt or to enter into any variable rate transaction other than with Yorkville, subject to certain exceptions, and to distribute proceeds from the April 2024 Purchase Agreement to subsidiaries other than ECRC and 0896800 B.C. Ltd. (together with ECRC, the “Guarantors”), upon the entry by the Guarantors into a global guaranty agreement, dated as of April 11, 2024, among the Guarantors in favor of the April 2024 Purchasers (the “Guaranty Agreement”). Pursuant to the Guaranty Agreement, the Guarantors guaranteed the full, prompt and unconditional payment when due (whether at maturity, by acceleration or otherwise), and the performance of all liabilities, agreements and other obligations of NioCorp to the April 2024 Purchasers contained in the April 2024 Notes, the April 2024 Warrants, and the April 2024 Purchase Agreement, to the extent such liabilities, agreements, and obligations are payable in cash.
Based upon the Company’s analysis of the criteria contained in ASC 815, the Company determined that April 2024 Warrants met the definition of a derivative liability, as any Warrant exercise that could cause the holder to exceed 19.9% ownership of NioCorp Common Shares would require shareholder approval. As such, the April 2024 Warrants are recognized as Warrant liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet and were measured at their inception date fair value and are subsequently remeasured at each reporting period with changes being recorded as a non-operating gain or loss in the consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive loss.
The
Company elected to value the April 2024 Notes at fair value in accordance with ASC 815-15-25. The fair value of the April
2024 Notes was estimated using a Monte Carlo simulation pricing model and the April 2024 Notes were classified as Level 3
instruments. The Company incurred transaction costs totaling $
68
NioCorp Developments Ltd.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
June 30, 2025
(expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data or as otherwise stated)
| ● | $902 was recorded to Warrant liabilities, representing the initial fair value of the April 2024 Warrants based on the assumptions outlined below. | |
| ● | $ |
The following table discloses the primary inputs for the Monte Carlo model used in valuing the April 2024 Notes:
| Key Valuation Input | June 30, 2024 | April 12, 2024 | ||||||
| Closing Common Share price | $ | $ | ||||||
| Term (expiry) | ||||||||
| Weighted average of the equity volatility and implied volatility of the 2023 Public Warrants | % | % | ||||||
| Risk-free rate | % | % | ||||||
| Implied discount rate | % | % | ||||||
On September 4, 2024 and October 3, 2024, the Company entered into (i) consents and waivers (the “2024 Yorkville Consents”) to the April 2024 Notes issued and sold to Yorkville pursuant to the April 2024 Purchase Agreement and (ii) consents and waivers (together with the 2024 Yorkville Consents, the “2024 Note Consents”) to the April 2024 Notes issued and sold to Lind II pursuant to the April 2024 Purchase Agreement. The 2024 Note Consents, among other things, extended and deferred certain monthly payments and extended the maturity of the April 2024 Notes until January 31, 2025. On January 3, 2025, the Company entered into a consent and waiver (the “January Yorkville Consent”) to the April 2024 Notes issued and sold to Yorkville pursuant to the April 2024 Purchase Agreement. The January Yorkville Consent, among other things, deferred the due date for the amounts that would otherwise have been due to Yorkville on January 1, 2025 to the maturity date and extended the maturity date to February 17, 2025, and prospectively waived any term of the April 2024 Notes that would otherwise be triggered upon a failure of the Company to pay to Yorkville the remainder of the amount due on January 1, 2025. All remaining amounts due to Lind II ($176) and Yorkville ($1,000) under the April 2024 Notes were repaid on January 6, 2025, and February 7, 2025, respectively.
The following table sets forth a summary of the changes in the fair value of the April 2024 Notes:
| Amount | ||||
| Fair value, April 12, 2024 | $ | |||
| Principal payments | ( | ) | ||
| Change in fair value | ( | ) | ||
| Balance, June 30, 2024 | ||||
| Principal payments | ( | ) | ||
| Change in fair value | ||||
| Balance, June 30, 2025 | $ | |||
The following table discloses the primary inputs for the Black-Scholes model used in valuing the April 2024 Warrants:
| Key Valuation Input | June 30, 2025 | June 30, 2024 | ||||||
| Closing Common Share price | $ | $ | ||||||
| Term (years) | ||||||||
| Historic equity volatility | % | % | ||||||
| Risk-free rate | % | % | ||||||
69
NioCorp Developments Ltd.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
June 30, 2025
(expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data or as otherwise stated)
The following table sets forth a summary of the changes in the fair value of the April 2024 Warrant liability:
| Amount | ||||
| Fair value as of April 12, 2024 | $ | |||
| Change in fair value | ( | ) | ||
| Fair value as of June 30, 2024 | ||||
| Change in fair value | ||||
| Fair value as of June 30, 2025 | $ | |||
| 9. | CLASS B COMMON STOCK OF ECRC |
Holders of the Class B common stock of ECRC have the right to exchange such shares for Common Shares on a one-for-one basis, subject to certain equitable adjustments, under certain conditions. All shares of Class B common stock of ECRC that were issued in connection with the Closing were issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2023. Of the issued and outstanding shares of Class B common stock of ECRC, shares (the “Vested Shares”) were vested as of the Closing Date and are exchangeable at any time, and from time to time, until the tenth anniversary of the Closing Date (the “Ten-Year Anniversary”) and shares (the “Earnout Shares”) are exchangeable until the Ten-Year Anniversary, subject to certain vesting conditions. Under certain circumstances, and subject to certain exceptions, NioCorp may instead settle all or a portion of any exchange pursuant to the terms of the Exchange Agreement, dated as of March 17, 2023, by and among NioCorp, ECRC, and GX Sponsor II LLC (the “Sponsor”) in cash, in lieu of Common Shares, based on a volume-weighted average price of Common Shares.
On February 28, 2024 and May 16, 2024, 243,692 Vested Shares and 40,000 Vested Shares, respectively, were exchanged for an equivalent number of Common Shares, and on December 12, 2024 and December 20, 2024, 25,000 Vested Shares and 323,085 Vested Shares, respectively, were exchanged for an equivalent number of Common Shares. These exchanges resulted in a change in the Company’s ownership interest in ECRC and were accounted for as an equity transaction in accordance with ASC 810-10-45-23, with no gain or loss recognized. Accordingly, the carrying amount of the noncontrolling interest was adjusted to reflect the change in the Company’s ownership interest with a corresponding offset to equity.
Both Vested Shares and Released Earnout Shares (as defined below) may be exchanged by the holders into Common Shares at any time. All Vested Shares and Earnout Shares must be exchanged for Common Shares by the Ten-Year Anniversary except for Released Earnout Shares that have been vested for a period of fewer than twenty-four months as of the Ten-Year Anniversary. Such Released Earnout Shares will be forfeited if not exchanged for Common Shares by the date that is twenty-four months after the vesting date.
Vested Shares
As the exchange of Vested Shares are contingently redeemable at the option of the noncontrolling interest shareholders, the Company classifies the carrying amount of the redeemable noncontrolling interest in the mezzanine section on the consolidated balance sheet, which is presented above the equity section and below liabilities. Adjustments to the carrying value of the redeemable noncontrolling interest associated with redemptions are recorded by reclassifying the proportionate amount of mezzanine equity to permanent equity.
Earnout Shares
70
NioCorp Developments Ltd.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
June 30, 2025
(expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data or as otherwise stated)
The Earnout Shares were classified as a liability due to failure to meet the equity classification criteria under ASC 815-40, as Level 3 instruments under the fair value hierarchy and are considered a financial liability under ASC 480, Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity. The Earnout Shares were measured at fair value on the Closing Date with subsequent changes in fair value recorded in earnings. The Earnout Shares were valued utilizing a Monte Carlo simulation pricing model. The following table discloses the primary inputs into the Monte Carlo models:
| Key Valuation Input | June 30, 2025 | June 30, 2024 | June 30, 2023 | |||||||||
| Closing Common Share price | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||
| Term (expiry) | ||||||||||||
| Implied volatility of the 2023 Public Warrants | % | % | % | |||||||||
| Risk-free rate | % | % | % | |||||||||
The following table sets forth a summary of the changes in the fair value of the Earnout Shares liability for the year ended June 30, 2025:
| Amount | ||||
| Fair value as of June 30, 2023 | $ | |||
| Change in fair value | ( | ) | ||
| Fair value as of June 30, 2024 | ||||
| Change in fair value | ||||
| Fair value as of June 30, 2025 | $ | |||
| 10. | COMMON SHARES |
| a) | Issuances |
Fiscal Year 2025 Issuances
71
NioCorp Developments Ltd.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
June 30, 2025
(expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data or as otherwise stated)
The following table discloses the primary inputs for the Black-Scholes model used in valuing the November 2024 Public Warrants:
| November 5, 2024 | ||||||||
| November 2024 Public Warrants: | Series A Public Warrants | Series B Public Warrants | ||||||
| Closing Common Share price | $ | $ | ||||||
| Term (years) | ||||||||
| Historic equity volatility | % | % | ||||||
| Risk-free rate | % | % | ||||||
Based
upon the Company’s analysis of the criteria contained in ASC 815, the Company determined that the November 2024
Private Warrants met the definition of a derivative liability, as any Warrant exercise that could cause the holder to exceed
19.9% ownership of NioCorp Common Shares would require shareholder approval. As such, the November 2024 Private Warrants were
recognized as warrant liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet and were measured at their issuance date fair value of
$
The following tables disclose the primary inputs for the Black-Scholes model used in valuing the November 2024 Private Warrants:
| November 13, 2024 | ||||||||
| November 2024 Private Warrants: | Series A Private Warrants | Series B Private Warrants | ||||||
| Closing Common Share price | $ | $ | ||||||
| Term (years) | ||||||||
| Historic equity volatility | % | % | ||||||
| Risk-free rate | % | % | ||||||
72
NioCorp Developments Ltd.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
June 30, 2025
(expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data or as otherwise stated)
| June 30, 2025 | ||||||||
| November 2024 Private Warrants: | Series A Private Warrants | Series B Private Warrants | ||||||
| Closing Common Share price | $ | $ | ||||||
| Term (years) | ||||||||
| Historic equity volatility | % | % | ||||||
| Risk-free rate | % | % | ||||||
The following table sets forth a summary of the changes in the fair value of the November 2024 Private Warrants liabilities:
| November 2024 Private Warrants | ||||
| Fair value at issuance (November 13, 2024) | $ | |||
| Fair value of Warrants exercised | ( | ) | ||
| Change in fair value | ||||
| Fair value as of June 30, 2025 | $ | |||
The following primary inputs were used in the Black-Scholes model for valuing the January 2025 Warrants:
Series A Public Warrants | Series B Public Warrants | |||||||
| Closing Common Share price | $ | $ | ||||||
| Term (years) | ||||||||
| Historic equity volatility | % | % | ||||||
| Risk-free rate | % | % | ||||||
73
NioCorp Developments Ltd.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
June 30, 2025
(expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data or as otherwise stated)
Fiscal Year 2024 Issuances
On
September 1, 2023, the Company closed a non-brokered private placement of
units of the Company (the “September 2023 Units”). A total of September 2023 Units were issued at a price
per September 2023 Unit of $, for total gross proceeds to the Company of $
The
September 2023 Warrants were classified as an equity instrument and accordingly, the net proceeds of $
On
December 22, 2023, the Company closed a non-brokered private placement (the “December 2023 Private Placement”) of
units of the Company (the “December 2023 Units”). Each December 2023 Unit consists of one Common Share and
one Warrant (“December 2023 Warrant”). Each December 2023 Warrant entitles the holder to acquire one Common Share
at a price of $ at any time until December 22, 2025. of the December 2023 Units were issued and sold to certain accredited
investors, who are not affiliated with the Company but with whom the Company had a pre-existing relationship, at a price of $per December 2023 Unit, and of the December 2023 Units were issued and sold to certain officers and directors of the Company
(the “Insider Investors”), at a price of $ per December 2023 Unit. The price per December 2023 Unit paid by the
Insider Investors included $0.125 per December 2023 Warrant underlying each December 2023 Unit purchased by the Insider Investors
which allowed the Insider Investors to participate in the December 2023 Private Placement in accordance with the rules of Nasdaq.
The Company received aggregate gross proceeds from the December 2023 Private Placement of approximately $
The
December 2023 Warrants were classified as an equity instrument and accordingly, the estimated net proceeds of $1,241 were allocated
based on the relative fair values of the Common Shares and the December 2023 Warrants on the date of issuance. The amount allocated
to the fair value of the December 2023 Warrants was $
On
June 24, 2024, the Company closed a non-brokered private placement of units of
the Company (the “June 2024 Units”). A total of June 2024 Units were issued at a price per June 2024 Unit
of $, for total gross proceeds to the Company of $
74
NioCorp Developments Ltd.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
June 30, 2025
(expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data or as otherwise stated)
The
June 2024 Warrants were classified as an equity instrument and accordingly, the net proceeds of $602 were allocated based on the
relative fair values of the Common Shares and the June 2024 Warrants on the date of issuance. The amount allocated to the fair
value of the June 2024 Warrants was $
Yorkville Equity Facility Financing Agreement Issuances
As
of June 30, 2025, the Company has access to up to $
| For The Year Ended June 30, | ||||||||
| 2025 | 2024 | |||||||
| Common Shares issued | ||||||||
| Gross funds received | $ | $ | ||||||
| Market value of Common Shares issued | ||||||||
| Loss on issuance(1) | $ | $ | ||||||
| (1) |
| b) | Stock Options |
On January 19, 2024, the Company’s shareholders voted to approve an amendment and restatement of its long-term incentive plan (the “2017 Amended Long-Term Incentive Plan”) and the granting of incentive securities thereunder until January 19, 2027. Under the 2017 Amended Long-Term Incentive Plan, the Board may, in its discretion from time to time, grant Options and share units (in the form of restricted share units and performance share units), plus dividend equivalents, to non-employee directors, employees and certain other service providers (as described in the 2017 Amended Long-Term Incentive Plan) of the Company and affiliated entities selected by the Board.
Subject to adjustment as described in the 2017 Amended Long-Term Incentive Plan, the aggregate number of Common Shares that may be reserved for issuance to participants under the 2017 Amended Long-Term Incentive Plan, together with all other security-based compensation arrangements of the Company, may not exceed 10% of the issued and outstanding Common Shares from time to time, and the Common Shares reserved for issuance upon settlement of share units will not exceed 5% of the issued and outstanding Common Shares from time to time. The 2017 Amended Long-Term Incentive Plan limits the maximum number of Common Shares issued to insiders (as defined under TSX rules for this purpose) within any 1-year period, or issuable to insiders at any time, in the aggregate, under all security-based compensation arrangements (including the 2017 Amended Long-Term Incentive Plan) to 10% of the then issued and outstanding Common Shares. The 2017 Amended Long-Term Incentive Plan also limits the aggregate number of Common Shares that may be reserved for issuance to any one participant under the 2017 Amended Long-Term Incentive Plan, together with all other security-based compensation arrangements of the Company, to 5% of the then issued and outstanding Common Shares (on a non-diluted basis). Subject to the adjustment provisions of the 2017 Amended Long-Term Incentive Plan, the aggregate number of Common Shares actually issued or transferred by the Company upon the exercise of Options will also be limited, as described in the 2017 Amended Long-Term Incentive Plan.
The Board has power over the granting, amendment, administration, or settlement of any award.
75
NioCorp Developments Ltd.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
June 30, 2025
(expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data or as otherwise stated)
Option transactions are summarized as follows:
| Number of Options | Weighted Average Exercise Price | Aggregate Intrinsic Value | Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life | ||||||||||||||
| Balance, June 30, 2023 | $ | ||||||||||||||||
| Granted | |||||||||||||||||
| Exercised | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||
| Cancelled/expired | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||
| Balance, June 30, 2024 | |||||||||||||||||
| Granted | |||||||||||||||||
| Exercised | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||
| Cancelled/expired | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||
| Balance, June 30, 2025 | $ | $ | years | ||||||||||||||
As
of June 30, 2025, of the outstanding Options were fully vested. The total intrinsic value of Options exercised during the
year ended June 30, 2025 was nil, and as of June 30, 2025, there was $
The following table summarizes the weighted average information and assumptions used to determine Option costs:
| For the year ended June 30, | ||||||||
| 2025 | 2024 | |||||||
| Fair value per option granted during the period | $ | $ | ||||||
| Risk-free interest rate | % | % | ||||||
| Expected dividend yield | % | % | ||||||
| Expected stock price volatility (historical basis) | % | % | ||||||
| Expected option life in years | ||||||||
Prior to January 1, 2024, the Company concluded that under ASU 718, Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718), Options previously issued on December 31, 2021, May 30, 2022, and March 27, 2023, which included a C$ strike price (the “CAD Options”) should remain equity-classified as management determined that the Options qualified for an exemption from liability classification as the CAD Options were denominated in a currency in which a substantial portion of the Company’s equity securities traded. Effective January 1, 2024, the Company determined that due to historically decreasing trading volume on the TSX, this exemption no longer applied and accordingly, these CAD Options were classified as a liability based on their fair values on that date. The Company recorded a mark-to-market gain of $147 in other operating expenses related to these CAD Option liabilities for the year ended June 30, 2024. The CAD Options expired at various dates during the year ended June 30, 2025, with no further gains or losses recorded in other operating expenses.
On March 28, 2024, the Board approved a modification to Options previously issued on March 27, 2023, with dual strike prices of $6.95 and C$9.52, under which the option to exercise in C$ was removed. No other terms or conditions were amended by the Board. Based on this amendment, the Company re-classified these Options to equity on March 28, 2024, based on their fair value on that date.
| c) | Warrants |
Warrant transactions are summarized as follows. Weighted average exercise prices related to Canadian dollar denominated Warrants were converted to U.S. dollars using end of period foreign currency exchange rates.
76
NioCorp Developments Ltd.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
June 30, 2025
(expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data or as otherwise stated)
| Warrants | Weighted Average Exercise Price | |||||||
| Balance, June 30, 2023 | $ | |||||||
| Granted | ||||||||
| Expired | ( | ) | ||||||
| Balance, June 30, 2024 | ||||||||
| Granted | ||||||||
| Exercised | ( | ) | ||||||
| Expired | ( | ) | ||||||
| Balance, June 30, 2025 | $ | |||||||
At June 30, 2025, the Company has outstanding exercisable Warrants, as follows:
| Number | Exercise Price | Expiry Date | ||||||
| $ | ||||||||
| (1) | ||||||||
| No expiry | ||||||||
| (1) |
In connection with the Closing, pursuant to the Business Combination Agreement, the Company assumed GXII’s obligations under the agreement (the “GXII Warrant Agreement”) governing the GXII share purchase Warrants (the “GXII Warrants”) and each GXII Warrant thereunder that was issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Closing Date was converted into one Warrant to purchase 1.11829212 Common Shares (the “NioCorp Assumed Warrants”) pursuant to the GXII Warrant Agreement, as amended by an Assignment, Assumption and Amendment Agreement, dated March 17, 2023, among the Company, GXII, Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company, as the existing warrant agent, and Computershare Inc. and its affiliate, Computershare Trust Company, N.A, together as the successor warrant agent (the “NioCorp Assumed Warrant Agreement”). In connection with the Closing, NioCorp issued (a) public NioCorp Assumed Warrants (the “2023 Public Warrants”) in respect of the GXII Warrants that were publicly traded prior to the Closing and (b) NioCorp Assumed Warrants (the “2023 Private Warrants”) to the Sponsor in respect of the GXII Warrants that it held prior to the Closing, which NioCorp Assumed Warrants were subsequently distributed by the Sponsor to its members in connection with the Closing.
Each NioCorp Assumed Warrant entitles the holder to the right to purchase 1.11829212 Common Shares at an exercise price of $11.50 per 1.11829212 Common Shares (subject to adjustments for stock splits, stock dividends, reorganizations, recapitalizations and the like). No fractional shares will be issued upon exercise of any NioCorp Assumed Warrants, and fractional shares that would otherwise be due to the exercising holder will be rounded down to the nearest whole Common Share. In no event will the Company be required to net cash settle any NioCorp Assumed Warrant.
77
NioCorp Developments Ltd.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
June 30, 2025
(expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data or as otherwise stated)
2023 Public Warrants
The
Company may elect to redeem the 2023 Public Warrants subject to certain conditions, in whole and not in part, at a price of
$0.01 per 2023 Public Warrant if (i) 30 days’ prior written notice of redemption is provided to the holders,
2023 Private Warrants
The 2023 Private Warrants: (i) will be exercisable either for cash or on a cashless basis at the holder’s option and (ii) will not be redeemable by the Company, in either case as long as the 2023 Private Warrants are held by the initial purchasers or their permitted transferees. Any 2023 Private Warrants that are held by someone other than the initial purchasers or their permitted transferees are treated as 2023 Public Warrants.
The Company accounts for the 2023 Private Warrants in accordance with the guidance contained in ASC 815-40. Such guidance provides that because the 2023 Private Warrants do not meet the criteria for equity treatment thereunder, the 2023 Private Warrants must be recorded as a liability. This liability is carried as a component of Warrant liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet and is subject to re-measurement at each balance sheet date. With each such re-measurement, the warrant liability will be adjusted to its current fair value, with the change in fair value recognized in the consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive loss. The Company will reassess the classification at each balance sheet date.
As
provided for in the
The Company classifies the 2023 Private Warrants as Level 2 instruments under the fair value hierarchy and estimated the fair value using a Black Scholes model with the following assumptions:
| Key Valuation Input | June 30, 2025 | June 30, 2024 | ||||||
| Stock price on valuation date | $ | $ | ||||||
| Strike price | $ | $ | ||||||
| Implied volatility of the 2023 Public Warrants | % | % | ||||||
| Risk free rate | % | % | ||||||
| Dividend yield | % | % | ||||||
| Expected Warrant life in years | ||||||||
The change in the 2023 Private Warrants liability is presented below:
| Amount | ||||
| Valuation at June 30, 2023 | $ | |||
| Change in valuation | ( | ) | ||
| Valuation at June 30, 2024 | ||||
| Exchange of 2023 Private Warrants for 2023 Public Warrants | ( | ) | ||
| Change in valuation | ||||
| Valuation at June 30, 2025 | $ |
| ||
78
NioCorp Developments Ltd.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
June 30, 2025
(expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data or as otherwise stated)
Contingent Consent Warrants
On
September 17, 2024, the Company’s Common Share price was below the threshold price set forth in the Lind Consent, and accordingly,
the Company issued Contingent Consent Warrants to Lind III. Each Contingent Consent Warrant is exercisable for one Common
Share at an exercise price of $ and may be exercised at any time prior to their expiration on September 17, 2028. The number
of Contingent Consent Warrants issued was based on $
| Key Valuation Input | September 17, 2024 | |||
| Closing Common Share price | $ | |||
| Term (years) | ||||
| Historic equity volatility | % | |||
| Risk-free rate | % | |||
The change in the fair value of the Contingent Consent Warrants liability is presented below:
| Amount | ||||
| Valuation at June 30, 2024 | $ | |||
| Fair value of Warrants issued | ( | ) | ||
| Gain on issuance of Warrants | ( | ) | ||
| Ending balance | $ | |||
The
Company recognized a gain of $
| 11. | RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS AND BALANCES |
On
September 11, 2024, the Company and Mark Smith, Chief Executive Officer, President, and Executive Chairman of NioCorp, entered
into a loan agreement (the “Smith Loan Agreement”), which provided for a $
Through
October 30, 2024, the Company borrowed a total of $
79
NioCorp Developments Ltd.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
June 30, 2025
(expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data or as otherwise stated)
| 12. | EXPLORATION EXPENDITURES |
| For the year ended June 30, | ||||||||
| 2025 | 2024 | |||||||
| Feasibility study and engineering | $ | $ | ||||||
| Field management and other | ||||||||
| Drilling | ||||||||
| Metallurgical | ||||||||
| Geologists and field staff | ||||||||
| Total | $ | $ | ||||||
| 13. | LEASES |
As
of June 30, 2025 and 2024, the Company had one corporate office lease with a remaining lease term of years as of June 30,
2025. During the year ended June 30, 2025 and 2024, operating cash flows included cash payments of $
The Company incurred lease costs as follows:
| For the year ended June 30, | ||||||||
| 2025 | 2024 | |||||||
| Fixed rent expense | $ | $ | ||||||
| Variable rent expense | ||||||||
| Short term lease cost | ||||||||
| Sublease income | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Net lease cost – other operating expense | $ | $ | ||||||
The maturity of lease liabilities is as follows at June 30, 2025:
| Fiscal Year Lease Maturities | ||||
| 2026 | $ | |||
| 2027 | ||||
| Total lease payments | ||||
| Less amount of payments representing interest | ( | ) | ||
| Present value of lease payments | ||||
| Less current portion of operating lease liability | ( | ) | ||
| Noncurrent operating lease liability | $ | |||
| 14. | INCOME TAXES |
Domestic and foreign components of loss before income taxes for the years ended June 30, 2025 and 2024 are as follows:
| For the year ended June 30, | ||||||||
| 2025 | 2024 | |||||||
| Canada | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | ||
| United States | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| United Kingdom | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Total | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | ||
80
NioCorp Developments Ltd.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
June 30, 2025
(expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data or as otherwise stated)
The following table is a reconciliation of income taxes at statutory rates:
| For the year ended June 30, | ||||||||
| 2025 | 2024 | |||||||
| Loss before income taxes | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | ||
| Income tax benefit at Canadian federal rate | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Income tax benefit at Canadian provincial rate | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Warrant liability | ( | ) | ||||||
| Earnout shares liability | ( | ) | ||||||
| Share based compensation | ||||||||
| Foreign rate differential | ||||||||
| Accretion expense | ||||||||
| Change in estimates related to prior years | ||||||||
| Stock issuance costs in equity | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Convertible note valuation | ( | ) | ||||||
| Other | ||||||||
| Change in valuation allowance | ||||||||
| Income tax benefit | $ | $ | ||||||
Income
tax benefit for the year ended June 30, 2024, was derived solely from our U.S. operations. The Company acquired a federal income tax payable of $
Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. The significant components of deferred taxes are as follows:
| As of June 30, | ||||||||
| 2025 | 2024 | |||||||
| Deferred tax assets | ||||||||
| Net operating losses available for future periods | $ | $ | ||||||
| Mineral interests | ||||||||
| Startup and organizational costs | ||||||||
| Research and development costs | ||||||||
| Share issuance/financing costs | ||||||||
| Canadian restricted interest and financing carryforward | ||||||||
| Capital losses available for future periods | ||||||||
| Other | ||||||||
| Total deferred tax assets | ||||||||
| Valuation allowance | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Net deferred tax assets | $ | $ | ||||||
Changes in the valuation allowance are as follows:
| For the year ended June 30, | ||||||||
| 2025 | 2024 | |||||||
| Valuation allowance, beginning of year | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | ||
| Current year additions | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Valuation allowance, end of year | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | ||
The
Company establishes a valuation allowance against future income tax assets if, based on available information, it is more likely
than not that all of the assets will not be realized. The valuation allowance of $
81
NioCorp Developments Ltd.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
June 30, 2025
(expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data or as otherwise stated)
The Company has the following cumulative
net operating losses for Canadian and U.S. Federal income tax purposes. Canadian tax loss carryforwards will generally expire between
2028 and 2045. U.S. tax losses incurred through June 30, 2018, totaled $
| As of June 30, | ||||||||
| Jurisdiction | 2025 | 2024 | ||||||
| Canada | $ | $ | ||||||
| United States | ||||||||
| United Kingdom | ||||||||
| Total | $ | $ | ||||||
In
addition, the Company has a Canadian capital loss carryforward of $
At June 30, 2025 and 2024, we had no undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries that would be subject to income tax upon distribution to Canada from a foreign subsidiary. As such, as of June 30, 2025 and 2024, we did not provide for deferred taxes on any such earnings of our foreign subsidiaries.
The Company had no unrecognized tax benefits as of June 30, 2025 or 2024. The Company has not recognized any interest or penalties in the fiscal years presented in these consolidated financial statements. The Company is subject to income tax in the U.S. federal jurisdiction, the United Kingdom, and Canada. Certain years remain subject to examination but there are currently no ongoing exams in any taxing jurisdictions.
On July 4, 2025, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (“OBBBA”) was enacted in the U.S., which includes a broad range of tax reform provisions affecting businesses. The OBBBA includes numerous changes to existing tax law including extending or making permanent certain business and international tax measures initially established under the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which were set to expire. The OBBBA contains several changes to corporate taxation including modifications to capitalization of research and development expenses, modifications to deductions for interest expense, and accelerated depreciation on certain asset additions. As the legislation was signed into law after June 30, 2025, our operating results for the year ended June 30, 2025, do not include any adjustments related to the OBBBA, and the Company does not expect a material impact to our financial statements due to the enactment of the OBBBA.
| 15. | Fair Value Measurements |
The Company measures the fair value of financial assets and liabilities based on U.S. GAAP guidance which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements.
The Company classifies financial assets and liabilities as held-for-trading, available-for-sale, held-to-maturity, loans and receivables, or other financial liabilities depending on their nature. Financial assets and financial liabilities are recognized at fair value on their initial recognition.
Financial assets and liabilities classified as held-for-trading are measured at fair value, with gains and losses recognized in net income. Financial assets classified as held-to-maturity, loans and receivables, and financial liabilities other than those classified as held-for-trading are measured at amortized cost, using the effective interest method of amortization. Financial assets classified as available-for-sale, including investments in equity securities, are measured at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses being recognized in income.
Financial instruments including receivables, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, and related party loans are carried at amortized cost, which management believes approximates fair value due to the short-term nature of these instruments.
The following tables present information about the assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2025, and 2024, respectively, and indicate the fair value hierarchy of the valuation techniques the
82
NioCorp Developments Ltd.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
June 30, 2025
(expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data or as otherwise stated)
Company utilized to determine such fair value. In general, fair values determined by Level 1 inputs utilize quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical instruments. Fair values determined by Level 2 inputs utilize data points that are observable, such as quoted prices, interest rates, and yield curves. Fair values determined by Level 3 inputs are unobservable data points for the financial instrument and include situations where there is little, if any, market activity for the instrument.
| As of June 30, 2025 | ||||||||||||||||
| Total | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | |||||||||||||
| Assets: | ||||||||||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||
| Investment in equity securities | ||||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||
| Liabilities: | ||||||||||||||||
| Earnout Shares liability | $ | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||
| Warrant liabilities | ||||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||
| As of June 30, 2024 | ||||||||||||||||
| Total | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | |||||||||||||
| Assets: | ||||||||||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||
| Investment in equity securities | ||||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||
| Liabilities: | ||||||||||||||||
| April 2024 notes | $ | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||
| Earnout Shares liability | ||||||||||||||||
| Warrant liabilities | ||||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||
| 16. | SEGMENT INFORMATION |
The Company has one reportable segment: the United States. The United States segment conducts exploration, development, and care and maintenance activities at the Elk Creek Project. This segment holds substantially all of the Company’s non-current assets and does not presently report any revenues from operations. Through this segment, the Company seeks to position the Elk Creek Project as a development opportunity in the strategic minerals sector. The Company’s chief operating decision maker is the Chief Executive Officer (“CODM”).
Financial information and annual operating plans and forecasts are prepared and reviewed by the CODM at a consolidated level. The CODM assesses performance for the single operating segment and decides how to better allocate resources based on total operating expenses, net loss, changes in cash and cash equivalents, and cash and cash-equivalent balances that are reported on the Consolidated Statement of Operations and Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows. The Company’s objective in making resource allocation decisions is to optimize the Company’s ability to develop and operate the Elk Creek Project. In addition, the CODM reviews the segment’s assets based on total assets reported on the consolidated balance sheet, and the accounting policies of our single operating segment are the same as those described in the Summary of Significant Accounting Policies herein. For additional reportable single operating segment level financial information, see the Consolidated Financial Statements.
| 17. | SUBSEQUENT EVENTS |
The July 2025 Offering
Maxim
83
NioCorp Developments Ltd.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
June 30, 2025
(expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data or as otherwise stated)
acted as sole placement agent for the July 2025 Offering. The Company intends to use the net proceeds from the July 2025 Offering for working capital and general corporate purposes, including to advance its efforts to launch construction of the Elk Creek Project and move it to commercial operation.
Other Common Share Issuances
During the period from July 1, 2025 through September 11, 2025, the Company issued Common Shares through the exercise
of Warrants and Options by their holders and received cash totaling approximately $
Purchases of Land
On August 1, 2025, ECRC closed on its option to purchase three parcels of land in Johnson County, Nebraska (the “Property”), pursuant to the terms of the Option to Purchase, dated as of December 4, 2009, as amended, and the Option to Purchase, dated December 4, 2014, as amended, each between Roger and Nancy Woltemath (the “Owners”) and ECRC (together, the “Option Agreements”). Pursuant to the terms of the Option Agreements, the Owners sold, transferred, conveyed and assigned to ECRC all of their rights, privileges, title and interest in and to the surface rights with respect to one of the parcels (consisting of the property known as Woltemath80S) and to the surface rights and associated mineral rights with respect to the other two parcels (consisting of approximately 1.66 acres of the property known as Woltemath002).
The
Option Agreements provided for a purchase price calculated based on the appraised value per acre of the parcels of land. The aggregate
purchase price was approximately $
DoD Agreement
On
August 4, 2025, ECRC entered into a Project Sub-Agreement (the “DoD Agreement”) with Advanced Technology International
(“ATI”), an entity acting on behalf of the Defense Industrial Base Consortium under the authority of the U.S. Department
of Defense (“DoD”). Subject to the terms and conditions of the DoD Agreement, ECRC is entitled to receive up to an
aggregate of approximately $
84
| ITEM 9. | CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE. |
None.
| ITEM 9A. | CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES |
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The management of NioCorp Developments Ltd. has evaluated, under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of June 30, 2025. Based on that evaluation, the CEO and the CFO have concluded that, as of June 30, 2025, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective due to the material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting described below.
Notwithstanding the material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting, our CEO and CFO have concluded that the audited consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly present, in all material respects, our financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented in conformity with U.S. GAAP.
The Company’s disclosure controls and procedures have been designed to ensure that: (i) information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit to the SEC under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in applicable rules and forms and (ii) material information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management, including the CEO and the CFO, as appropriate, to allow for accurate and timely decisions regarding required disclosures.
Management does not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures will prevent all error and all fraud. The effectiveness of our or any system of disclosure controls and procedures, however well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance that the objectives of the system will be met and is subject to certain limitations, including the exercise of judgment in designing, implementing, and evaluating controls and procedures and the assumptions used in identifying the likelihood of future events.
Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
The management of NioCorp Developments Ltd. is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act for the Company. Management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2025. In making this assessment, our management used the criteria set forth in the Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the “COSO Framework”). Based on that evaluation, the CEO and the CFO have concluded that, as of June 30, 2025, our internal control over financial reporting was not effective due to the material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting described below.
Material Weaknesses
A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of our annual or interim consolidated financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.
Management concluded that the material weaknesses disclosed in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2023, continued to exist as of June 30, 2025. Specifically, management identified deficiencies in the principles associated with the control environment, risk assessment, control activities, and monitoring components of internal control, based on the criteria established by the COSO Framework, that constitute material weaknesses, either individually or in the aggregate.
85
| ● | Control Environment: The Company does not have sufficient personnel with the appropriate levels of knowledge, experience, and training in accounting and internal control over financial reporting commensurate with the complexity of the Company’s financing transactions and associated reporting requirements. This material weakness contributed to additional material weaknesses further described below. |
| ● | Risk Assessment: The Company does not have a formal process to identify, update, and assess financial reporting risks due to changes in the Company’s business practices, including entering into increasingly complex transactions that could significantly impact the design and operation of the Company’s control activities. |
| ● | Control Activities: Management did not maintain effective controls over: |
| ○ | monitoring and assessing the work of third-party specialists, including the evaluation of the appropriateness of accounting conclusions, |
| ○ | the evaluation of certain inputs and assumptions used to estimate the fair value of instruments and features associated with complex debt and equity transactions, and |
| ○ | the design and implementation of effective process-level control activities related to vendor banking information. |
| ● | Monitoring Activities: Management did not appropriately: |
| ○ | select, develop, and perform ongoing evaluation to ascertain whether the components of internal controls are present and functioning, and |
| ○ | evaluate and communicate internal control deficiencies in a timely manner to those parties responsible for taking corrective action. |
As previously disclosed, these material weaknesses resulted in errors that required the restatement of Company’s consolidated financial statements as of and for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2022 and 2021, as well as the restatement of the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements as of and for the interim periods ended September 30, 2021, December 31, 2021, March 31, 2022, September 30, 2022 and December 31, 2022. Additionally, these material weaknesses could result in a misstatement of the account balances or disclosures that would result in a material misstatement to the annual or interim consolidated financial statements that would not be prevented or timely detected.
Remediation Plan
To address our material weaknesses existing as of June 30, 2025, we have implemented a detailed plan to address each individual material weakness identified, including the following:
| ● | We have, and will continue, to engage outside accounting and internal control consultants with subject matter expertise to supplement our level of knowledge, experience, and training in accounting and internal control over financial reporting. |
| ● | We have developed a formal risk assessment process requiring periodic review and updates of current risks and internal controls, as well as a focus on potential future events that could result in additional risks and/or internal control lapses. This process is expected to enable us to effectively identify, develop, evolve, and implement controls and procedures to address risks, and results of this risk assessment process will be reviewed with the Audit Committee on a periodic basis. |
| ● | We have developed an initial training plan to provide incremental training to accounting and finance personnel responsible for overall technical accounting and valuation-related transactions. |
| ● | Management is developing a monitoring program to periodically evaluate and assess whether those responsible for controls are conducting their activities in accordance with their design, such that there is contemporaneous evidence that the controls are present and functioning and will communicate internal control deficiencies in a timely manner to those parties responsible for taking corrective action. |
86
The process of designing and maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting is a continuous effort that requires management to anticipate and react to changes in our business, economic and regulatory environments and to expend significant resources. As we continue to evaluate our internal control over financial reporting, we may take additional actions to remediate the material weaknesses or modify the remediation actions described above.
While we continue to devote significant time and attention to these remediation efforts, the material weaknesses will not be considered remediated until management completes the design and implementation of the actions described above and the controls operate for a sufficient period of time, and management has concluded, through testing, that these controls are effective.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Other than as discussed above, there has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended June 30, 2025, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
| ITEM 9B. | OTHER INFORMATION |
During
the quarter ended June 30, 2025,
| ITEM 9C. | DISCLOSURE REGARDING FOREIGN JURISDICTIONS THAT PREVENT INSPECTION |
Not applicable.
87
PART III
| ITEM 10. | DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE |
Directors and Executive Officers
The following table sets forth as of September 11, 2025, the names and ages of, and position or positions held by, our executive officers and directors, the employment background of these persons, and any directorships held by the current directors during the last five years.
| Name | Age | Position | Date of Appointment | |||
| Mark A. Smith | 66 | Chief Executive Officer, President, Executive Chairman, and Director | Chief Executive Officer and Director: September 23, 2013 President and Executive Chairman: May 31, 2015 | |||
| Neal Shah | 51 | Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary | Chief Financial Officer: July 1, 2016 Corporate Secretary: December 3, 2021 | |||
| Scott Honan | 54 | Chief Operating Officer | May 6, 2014 | |||
| Jim Sims | 64 | Chief Communications Officer | November 2, 2015 | |||
| Ernest Cleave | 55 | Senior Vice President of Business Development | August 15, 2025 | |||
| David C. Beling | 84 | Director | June 6, 2011 | |||
| Anthony W. Fulton | 52 | Director | August 9, 2025 | |||
| Nilsa Guerrero-Mahon | 64 | Director | September 28, 2017 | |||
| Dean C. Kehler | 68 | Director | March 17, 2023 | |||
| Michael G. Maselli | 65 | Director | March 17, 2023 | |||
| Peter Oliver | 62 | Director | May 25, 2022 |
The following sets forth a brief description of the business experience of each executive officer and director of the Company, including current directorships and directorships held in, at least, the past five years for each director:
Mark A. Smith – Executive Chairman, Director, President, and Chief Executive Officer
Mr. Smith has over 43 years of experience in operating, developing, and financing mining and strategic materials projects in the Americas and abroad. In September 2013, he was appointed CEO and a Director of NioCorp. From April 2015 to September 2019, Mr. Smith served as the President and Director for Largo Resources Ltd. (“Largo”), a mineral company with an operating property in Brazil and projects in Brazil and Canada. In addition, from April 2015 to October 2018, Mr. Smith also served as the CEO of Largo. Mr. Smith has also served on the board of directors of IBC Advanced Alloys Corp., a leading beryllium and copper advanced alloys company (“IBC”), since May 2016 and as CEO of IBC since July 2020. From October 2008 through December 2012, Mr. Smith served as President, CEO and Director of Molycorp, Inc., a rare earths producer (“Molycorp”), where he was instrumentally involved in taking it from a private company to a publicly traded company with a producing mine. From November 2011 through May 2015, he served on the board of directors at Avanti Mining, a mining company (TSX-V: AVT; Avanti Mining changed its name to AlloyCorp in early 2015). From December 2012 through September 2013, he served as the Managing Director of KMSmith LLC, a business strategy and finance advisory firm, where he served as a consultant.
Prior to Molycorp, Mr. Smith held numerous engineering, environmental, and legal positions within Unocal Corporation, a former petroleum explorer and marketer (“Unocal”), and later served as the President and CEO of Chevron Mining Inc., a coal and metal mining company and wholly owned subsidiary of Chevron Corporation (“Chevron Mining”). Mr. Smith also served for over seven years as the shareholder representative of Companhia Brasileira Metalúrgica e Mineração (“CBMM”), a private company that currently produces approximately 85% of the world supply of niobium. During his tenure with Chevron Mining, Mr. Smith was responsible for Chevron Mining’s three coal mines, one molybdenum mine, a petroleum coke calcining operation and Molycorp’s Mountain Pass mine. At Unocal, he served as the Vice-President from June 2000 to April 2006, and managed the real estate,
88
remediation, mining and carbon divisions. Mr. Smith is a Registered Professional Engineer and serves as an active member of the State Bars of California and Colorado. He received his Bachelor of Science degree in Agricultural Engineering from Colorado State University in 1981 and his Juris Doctor, cum laude, from Western State University, College of Law, in 1990.
Neal Shah – Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary
Mr. Shah joined NioCorp in September 2014 as Vice President of Finance, and now serves as the Company’s CFO and Corporate Secretary. Mr. Shah served as Finance Manager at Covidien Ltd., a medical device company since acquired by Medtronic, from May 2014 through September 2014. From April 2011 until May 2014, he held the positions of Senior Manager of Corporate Development and M&A and more recently the Director of Strategy and Business Planning at Molycorp. Mr. Shah graduated from the University of Colorado with a BSc in Mechanical Engineering in 1996, and from Purdue University with an MBA in 2002. Since the completion of his MBA, Mr. Shah also held key finance roles with Intel Corporation and IBM.
Scott Honan – Chief Operating Officer
Mr. Honan joined NioCorp in May 2014 as Vice President, Business Development, and since July 2020, has served as the Company’s Chief Operating Officer (“COO”). He also serves as President of Elk Creek Resources Corporation, the NioCorp subsidiary that is developing the Elk Creek Project in Nebraska. Prior to his work at NioCorp, Mr. Honan served in several leadership capacities at Molycorp from February 2001 until May 2014, including as Vice President/Director Health, Environment, Safety and Sustainability and General Manager and Environmental Manager from July 2011 to May 2014. With over 32 years of experience in the gold and rare earth industries, Mr. Honan is a graduate of Queen’s University in Mining Engineering in both Mineral Processing (B.Sc. Honors) and Environmental Management (M.Sc.) disciplines.
Jim Sims – Chief Communications Officer
Mr. Sims has more than 32 years of experience in devising and executing marketing, media relations, public affairs, and investor relations operations for companies in the mining, chemical, manufacturing, utility, and renewable energy sectors. He joined NioCorp in November 2015 as Vice President, External Affairs, and now serves as its Chief Communications Officer, effective June 7, 2022. Prior to NioCorp, Mr. Sims served for more than five years as Director (and then Vice President) of Corporate Communications for Molycorp from March 2010 through November 2015. Since May 2016, Mr. Sims has also served as Director of Investor and Public Relations for IBC. Mr. Sims was President and CEO of Policy Communications, Inc. from 1998 until 2010 and served as White House Director of Communications for the Energy Policy Development Group. A former U.S. Senate Chief of Staff, he is the co-founder and former Executive Director of the Geothermal Energy Association, and he has served as Board Chairman of the Rare Earth Technology Alliance. He is an honors graduate of Georgetown University.
Ernest Cleave – Senior Vice President of Business Development
Mr. Cleave joined NioCorp in August 2025 as Senior Vice President of Business Development. Mr. Cleave has more than 20 years of experience in the mining, mineral processing, and energy industries. Prior to his work at NioCorp, Mr. Cleave served as the President and CEO of Tinova Resources Corp., a critical minerals exploration company, from June 2024 to August 2025. From September 2013 to June 2024, Mr. Cleave served as the Chief Financial Officer of Largo Inc., a supplier of vanadium and ilmenite products. Additionally, Mr. Cleave served as the Interim President of Largo Clean Energy Corp. (a subsidiary of Largo Inc.) from November 2022 to June 2023. Mr. Cleave’s career has also spanned leadership positions in several other mining and energy companies, including as Chief Financial Officer of Cline Mining, Chief Financial Officer of Petrolympic, Global Lead of Sarbanes-Oxley Compliance at Glencore (previously Falconbridge), and Treasurer and Director of Financial Planning and Analysis at Goldcorp. Mr. Cleave is a Chartered Accountant (AUS & NZL) and is a registered CPA in both Canada and Australia. Mr. Cleave earned his M.B.A. from Deakin University of Victoria, Australia and has undergraduate degrees in computational science and commerce, respectively.
David C. Beling – Director
Mr. Beling is a Registered Professional Mining Engineer with 61 years of project and corporate experience. He has served as a director on the boards of 14 mining companies starting in 1981, including NioCorp since 2011. Mr. Beling is the owner of D.C. Beling & Assoc., LLC, which provides strategic advisory, project, and corporate development services to the mining industry. His previous employment and consulting included 14 years with five major mining companies and then 47 years with 30+ U.S. and Canadian junior mining companies. He was the President, CEO, and Director of Bullfrog Gold Corp. from 2011 until October 2020; and the Executive Vice President
89
and COO of Geovic Mining Corp. from 2004 through 2010. Mr. Beling has examined, significantly reviewed, or been directly involved with 91 underground mines, 136 open pit mines, and 174 process plants in the global metal, energy, industrial mineral, and critical minerals sectors.
Anthony W. Fulton – Director
A former Nebraska State Senator and successful business entrepreneur, Mr. Fulton previously served on the Board from 2013 until 2016, when he left to serve as Nebraska Tax Commissioner and Director of the Nebraska Department of Revenue, a 400-employee, $9 billion enterprise from January 2016 to December 2022. A mechanical engineer by training, Mr. Fulton has been the President of the Nevada-based Hallmark Homecare, LLC, an independent domestic caregiver referral agency since May 2023 and is the Founder and Owner of Guardian Angels Homecare, Inc. of Lincoln, Nebraska, an in-home senior care company, where he has served as the President and CEO since March 2003. In addition to his work in the senior care industry, Mr. Fulton serves as the Chairman of the Diocesan Finance Council for the Catholic Diocese of Lincoln (Southern Nebraska) and is the recipient of numerous awards throughout his professional career. He received his B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Nebraska-Lincoln, with studies in Philosophy at Newman University in Wichita, Kansas and Theology at Mount Saint Mary’s University in Emmittsburg, Maryland.
Nilsa Guerrero-Mahon – Director
A former CFO and Controller for global corporations in the technology, energy, and government sectors, Ms. Guerrero-Mahon provides consulting services to domestic and international corporations as the principal at NGM Business Consulting, LLC. In addition, Ms. Guerrero-Mahon was appointed to the Board of FinGoal, Inc. in April 2022, a finance technology company building artificial intelligence tools for the financial services industry and other financial technology developers. She also serves as the Chair of the Finance and Audit Committee for the Financial Data Exchange (“FDX”). FDX unifies the financial industry around a common standard for secure and convenient access of permissioned consumer and business financial data. From 2014 to 2019, she served as the Vice Chair of the Board and Chaired the Strategy Committee for the Mountains & North Denver Operating Group, the largest division in the Common Spirit Health System (formerly Centura Health). From 2009 to 2025, Ms. Guerrero-Mahon served as a gubernatorial appointed Board Member of the State of Colorado Securities Commission and the Financial Services Commission. Among other prior positions, from 2004 to 2007, she was the Global Services Controller at Microsoft Corporation, overseeing internal controls, compliance and corporate finance activities.
Ms. Guerrero-Mahon stays current with the latest Corporate Governance practices serving as a member of the Nasdaq Center for Board Excellence. She is an NACD Board Leadership Fellow and a member of the SASB Alliance. She holds a CERT Certificate in Cybersecurity Oversight from Carnegie Mellon University. Ms. Guerrero-Mahon is a Certified Public Accountant and a Certified Fraud Examiner. She received an Executive MBA from the Daniels College of Business at the University of Denver, a BS in Business Administration - Accounting from the Interamerican University in San Juan, Puerto Rico, and an AS in Computer Science from the EDP University of Puerto Rico.
Peter Oliver – Director
With a background in chemistry, Mr. Oliver began working at Greenbushes, Western Australia, for Sons of Gwalia, a mining company, in May 2003. After Sons of Gwalia went into administration in 2004, Mr. Oliver was hired by Talison Lithium Limited (“Talison”), a mining company, where he served as General Manager of Talison’s Greenbushes and Wodgina Mines and as Talison’s COO, until Mr. Oliver was appointed as the CEO/Managing director. As Talison’s CEO/Managing director, Mr. Oliver led the listing of Talison on the Toronto Stock Exchange in September 2010.
Mr. Oliver guided Talison through its acquisition in 2013 by Tianqi Lithium Corporation (“Tianqi”). He then served as a corporate adviser to Tianqi, focusing on M&A opportunities and global expansion, including advising on the sale of 49% of Talison to Albermarle Corp. and the acquisition of 24% of Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile S.A., as well as significant expansions of Talison’s Greenbushes lithium concentrate production.
Mr. Oliver also was a founding member of Tianqi Lithium Energy Australia Pty Ltd, a wholly owned subsidiary of Tianqi, which was established to build a major Lithium Hydroxide manufacturing facility in Western Australia. Until June 2021, Mr. Oliver remained as a director of Talison, a joint venture between Tianqi and Albemarle Corp. In September 2022, Mr. Oliver was appointed to the Board of Latin Resources, a lithium exploration company in Australia. Mr. Oliver was appointed to the role of Executive Director of Latin Resources in 2024 and helped lead the successful acquisition of Latin Resources by Pilbara Minerals LTD (ASX: PLS) in March 2025.
90
Dean C. Kehler – Director
Mr. Kehler co-founded Trimaran Fund Management, L.L.C. (“Trimaran Fund”) in 1998, where he is a Managing Partner, and serves as a Manager of Trimaran Fund II. Mr. Kehler was also the Co-Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of GX Acquisition Corp. II, a position he held from August 2018 to March 2023. From 1995 to 2000, Mr. Kehler held senior positions at Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (“CIBC”), including Vice Chairman of CIBC World Markets Corp. Mr. Kehler currently serves on the Board of Directors of BCP Investment Corporation (formerly Portman Ridge Finance Corporation). Within the last five years, he has served a director of Celularity Inc. and El Pollo Loco Holdings, Inc. He holds a bachelor’s degree from the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania.
Michael G. Maselli – Director
Mr. Maselli is a managing director of Trimaran Fund, a position he has held since 2006, and was the President of Acquisitions of GX Acquisition Corp. II from August 2018 to March 2023. Before joining Trimaran Fund in February 2006, Mr. Maselli worked in the Corporate and Leverage Finance Groups of CIBC World Markets. Prior to joining CIBC in 1997, Mr. Maselli served as a Managing Director in Bear Stearns’ corporate finance group and, prior to that, as a Vice President at Kidder Peabody & Co. Incorporated. Mr. Maselli served on the board of directors of El Pollo Loco Holdings from 2010 to 2024, and he served as their Chairman of the Board from 2011 to 2023. He served on the board of ChanceLight, Inc. (f/k/a Educational Services of America, Inc.) until 2018. From 2013 to 2015, he served on the board of directors of Norcraft Companies, Inc., and also served on the board of managers of its predecessor company beginning in 2003. Additionally, Mr. Maselli served on the board of directors of Standard Steel, LLC, and was director as well as Chairman of the Board of CB Holding Corp. Mr. Maselli received an MBA with distinction from The A.B. Freeman School at Tulane University and a bachelor’s degree in economics from the University of Colorado.
Other Directorships
The following is a list of directorships held over the past five years by our directors. Except as listed below, no directors of the Company are also directors of reporting issuers.
| Name of Director | Other Reporting Issuer (or equivalent) | Exchange | ||
| David C. Beling | Bullfrog Gold | CSE | ||
| Mark A. Smith | IBC Advanced Alloys Corp. | TSX-V | ||
| Peter Oliver | Latin Resources | ASX | ||
| Dean C. Kehler | El Pollo Loco Holdings, Inc. BCP Investment Corporation Celularity Inc. GX Acquisition Corp. II |
Nasdaq Nasdaq Nasdaq Nasdaq | ||
| Michael G. Maselli | El Pollo Loco Holdings, Inc. | Nasdaq |
Legal Proceedings
No director or executive officer of the Company is a party adverse to the Company or any of its subsidiaries or has a material interest adverse to the Company or any of its subsidiaries.
During the past ten years, none of the persons serving as executive officers and/or directors of the Company and, with respect to promoters or control persons, for the past five years, none have been the subject matter of any of the legal proceedings that are required to be disclosed pursuant to Item 401(f) of Regulation S-K. Further, no such legal proceedings are believed to be contemplated by governmental authorities against any director or executive officer.
Ethical Business Conduct
The Board expects management to operate the business of the Company in a manner that enhances shareholder value and is consistent with the highest level of integrity. Management is expected to execute the Company’s business plan and to meet performance goals and objectives according to the highest ethical standards.
91
In addition, directors and senior officers are bound by the provisions of the Company’s Articles and the British Columbia Business Corporations Act (“BCBCA”), which set forth how any conflicts of interest are to be dealt with. In particular, any director who has a material interest in a particular transaction is required to disclose such interest and to refrain from voting with respect to the approval of any such transaction.
Insider Trading Policy
We have insider trading policies and procedures, as described below, applicable to our directors, officers, and employees, and have implemented processes for the Company, that we believe are reasonably designed to promote compliance with insider trading laws, rules, and regulations, and the Nasdaq listing standards.
The
Board has adopted an
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics
Our Board has adopted a written Code of Business Conduct and Ethics applicable to our employees, officers, and directors, including those officers responsible for financial reporting. The Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is available on our website at www.niocorp.com. If the Board amends the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics or grants a waiver, including an implicit waiver, from the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, the Company will disclose the information on its internet website. The waiver information will remain on the website for at least 12 months after the initial disclosure of such waiver. Given the current size of the Company workforce, and the lack of significant operations, the Board monitors compliance through periodic discussions with executive management.
Audit Committee and Audit Committee Financial Experts
Our Audit Committee is currently comprised of Anthony W. Fulton, Nilsa Guerrero-Mahon, Dean Kehler, and Michael Maselli, all of whom are independent directors. Our Board has determined that each of Ms. Guerrero-Mahon and Messrs. Kehler and Maselli are audit committee financial experts, as defined by the rules of the SEC. Further, all Audit Committee members are financially literate as defined in NI 52-110. The Audit Committee was established in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Exchange Act.
| ITEM 11. | EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION |
The following table sets out the compensation for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2025 and 2024 for the individual who served as the Company’s CEO during fiscal year 2025, as well as the Company’s two other most highly compensated executive officers other than the CEO who were serving at the end of the last fiscal year (collectively, the “named executive officers”):
Fiscal 2025 Summary Compensation Table
| Name and Principal Position | Fiscal Year | Salary ($) | Bonus ($) | Option Awards (1) ($) | Total ($) | |||||||||||||||
| Mark A. Smith, Chief Executive Officer, President (2) | 2025 | $325,000 | $— | $126,000 | $451,000 | |||||||||||||||
| 2024 | 325,000 | — | 641,250 | 966,250 | ||||||||||||||||
| Scott Honan, Chief Operating Officer | 2025 | 280,000 | — | 84,000 | 364,000 | |||||||||||||||
| 2024 | 280,000 | — | 427,500 | 707,500 | ||||||||||||||||
| Neal Shah, Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary | 2025 | 250,000 | — | 84,000 | 334,000 | |||||||||||||||
| 2024 | 250,000 | — | 427,500 | 677,500 | ||||||||||||||||
92
| (1) | Reflects the grant date fair value of the Options granted during the reported fiscal years. Fiscal year 2025 grants consisted of 150,000 Options for Mr. Smith and 100,000 Options for each of Messrs. Honan and Shah, in each case at an exercise price of $1.40 per share. Grant date fair values were computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. Assumptions used in the calculation of these amounts are described in Note 10b in the Company’s consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. These Options were fully vested on the grant date (December 23, 2024) and generally remain exercisable for a period of five years after the grant date. | |
| (2) | Disclosed amounts were paid to 76 Resources, LLC, an entity controlled by Mr. Smith, as further described below under “Employment Agreements and Severance Arrangements.” |
Narrative Disclosure to Summary Compensation Table
Compensation Governance
The Company’s Compensation and Organization Committee of the Board (the “Compensation Committee”) generally determines the amount of compensation for the Company’s executives, which is designed to reflect the need to provide incentives and compensation for the time and effort expended by the executives while taking into account the financial and other resources of the Company. The Compensation Committee has the authority to engage and compensate, at the expense of the Company, any outside advisor that it determines to be necessary to permit it to carry out its duties (including compensation consultants and advisors). For fiscal year 2025, however, the Compensation Committee did not engage any such advisors in connection with its activities. The Company has also determined that none of its compensation policies and practices creates any risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.
Compensation Program Design
The Board, in conjunction with the Compensation Committee, determines compensation and rewards to senior management on the basis of individual and corporate performance, both in the short term and the long term, while at the same time being mindful of the responsibility that the Company has to its shareholders. In general, the Compensation Committee considers that its compensation program should be relatively simple in concept, given the current stage of the Company’s development, and that its focus should be balanced between reasonable current compensation and longer-term compensation tied to performance of the Company as a whole.
For fiscal year 2025, the Compensation Committee did not establish a formal set of benchmarks or performance criteria to be met by the Company’s named executive officers; rather, the members of the Compensation Committee used their own subjective assessments of the level of success of the Company to determine, collectively, whether or not the named executive officers had successfully achieved the Company’s business plan and strategy and the degree to which they performed in that regard. The Compensation Committee also has not established any pre-determined formula for determining named executive officer compensation, either as to the amount thereof or the specific mix of compensation elements. Instead, compensation (and adjustments from time to time) is set through discussions and subjective assessments at the Compensation Committee level.
Key Elements of Named Executive Officer Compensation
Base Salaries
The members of the Compensation Committee use their own experience and familiarity with the industry, and consider the factors described above, to determine what they believe to be reasonable base salaries for our named executive officers. The base salaries of the named executive officers are set at levels which are considered by the members of the Compensation Committee to be competitive, thereby enabling the Company to compete for and retain executives critical to the long-term success of the Company. Initially, base salaries (or, for Mr. Smith, base consulting fees) are set through negotiation when executive officers join the Company (with direct input from the Compensation Committee) and are subsequently reviewed each fiscal year to determine if adjustments are required. For fiscal year 2025, no changes were made to the named executive officers’ base salary or consulting fees levels from those in effect for fiscal year 2024.
Bonus Compensation
The Board has discretion, where deemed appropriate and financially affordable for the Company, to grant a cash bonus to a named executive officer based on the performance of both the individual named executive officer and the
93
Company. No cash bonuses were contemplated, approved, or paid for the named executive officers for fiscal year 2025.
Option-Based Awards
The incentive portion of each named executive officer’s compensation package consists primarily of Options awarded under the 2017 Amended Long-Term Incentive Plan. Share ownership opportunities through the grant of Options are provided to align the interests of senior management of the Company with the longer-term interests of the shareholders of the Company.
The 2017 Amended Long-Term Incentive Plan is administered by the Board or Compensation Committee, and is intended to advance the interests of the Company through the attraction, motivation, and retention of officers and other key employees, directors and consultants of the Company and affiliates of the Company and to secure for the Company and its shareholders the benefits inherent in the ownership of Common Shares of the Company by officers and other key employees, directors and consultants of the Company and affiliates of the Company. Grants of Options under the 2017 Amended Long-Term Incentive Plan are proposed and recommended by the CEO and reviewed by the Board or Compensation Committee, or are proposed by the Board or Compensation Committee. The Board or Compensation Committee can approve, modify, or reject any proposed grants, in whole or in part. In general, the allocation of available Options among the eligible participants in the 2017 Amended Long-Term Incentive Plan is on an ad hoc basis, and there is no set formula for allocating available Options, nor is there any fixed benchmark or performance criteria to be achieved in order to receive an award of or vest in Options.
The Board or Compensation Committee does not consider the accounting value of any such Option grants in determining the number of Options to award to any individual, as any such “value” is an accounting measure that is not relevant to incentivizing the individual. The timing of the grants of Options is determined by the Board or Compensation Committee, and there is no regular interval for the awarding of Option grants. In general, a higher level of responsibility will result in a larger grant of Options. Because the number of Options available is limited, in general, the Board or Compensation Committee aims to have individuals at what it subjectively considers to be the same levels of responsibility holding equivalent numbers of Options, with additional grants being allocated for individuals who the Board or Compensation Committee believes are in a position to more directly affect the success of the Company through their efforts.
The Board or Compensation Committee looks at the overall number of Options held by an individual (plus the exercise prices and remaining terms of existing Options and whether any previously granted Options have expired out of the money or were exercised) and takes such information into consideration when reviewing proposed new grants. After considering the CEO’s recommendations, if any, and the foregoing factors, the resulting proposed Option grant is then submitted to the Board for final approval.
During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2025, the Board or Compensation Committee approved all recommendations for the grant of Options proposed by management, and the named executive officers were granted the following number of Options effective December 23, 2024, each with an exercise price per share of $1.40 per share: Mr. Smith, 150,000 Options; Mr. Honan, 100,000 Options; and Mr. Shah, 100,000 Options. These Options were fully vested and exercisable on the grant date and generally remain exercisable until five years after the grant date.
Employment Agreements and Severance Arrangements
Agreement Regarding Mr. Smith
The Company is currently a party to a Consulting Agreement with 76 Resources, LLC (an entity controlled by Mr. Smith) under which (as currently in effect, the “Smith Agreement”) 76 Resources, LLC, through Mr. Smith, performs the duties and responsibilities of the CEO of the Company and related services, for an indefinite term at a base rate of $325,000 per year as of June 30, 2025, generally payable in equal semi-monthly installments of $13,542. Any bonuses and incentive payments are payable at the discretion of the Board. Mr. Smith is eligible to receive Options under the 2017 Amended Long-Term Incentive Plan, as determined by the Board.
The Company may terminate the Smith Agreement at any time without notice or payment if (1) 76 Resources, LLC commits a material breach of the Smith Agreement (subject to a cure period in certain circumstances), (2) Mr. Smith dies or becomes permanently disabled, or (3) certain other “for cause” scenarios occur (as further described in the Smith Agreement). In the event the Smith Agreement is terminated by the Company for any other reason or if 76
94
Resources, LLC terminates the Smith Agreement on the occurrence of a Triggering Event, the Company shall pay 76 Resources, LLC a lump sum termination fee equal to the base fee in effect at the termination date as well as the average of any annual bonuses or other cash incentive payments for two calendar years immediately preceding the year the termination occurs. A Triggering Event is defined as: a substantial change in the nature of services to be performed by 76 Resources, LLC; a material breach by the Company of the Smith Agreement that is not remedied within 30 days of notice; the cessation of the Company as a going concern; the failure of the Company to pay a material amount due pursuant to the Smith Agreement within 30 days of the due date; or a material reduction in base fee or any other form of compensation payable by the Company to 76 Resources, LLC, except where all senior executives or consultants of the Company are subject to relatively similar reductions in such values. 76 Resources, LLC may terminate the Smith Agreement for a reason other than a Triggering Event on 90 days’ written notice and, should the Company immediately accept such termination notice, it shall pay 76 Resources, LLC the sum of $69,904. Should a change of control of the Company occur (as that term is defined in the Smith Agreement) and, within one year, either a Triggering Event occurs and 76 Resources, LLC terminates the Smith Agreement or 76 Resources, LLC’s engagement is terminated by the Company under circumstances that would give rise to a termination payment in the absence of a change of control, then 76 Resources, LLC shall be entitled to receive an amount equal to the base fee in effect at the termination date as well as the average of any annual bonuses or other cash payments for two calendar years immediately preceding the year the termination occurs. In the event 76 Resources, LLC is entitled to a termination payment with respect to a change of control, any Options previously granted to Mr. Smith shall become fully vested and shall remain exercisable for the original term of grant despite a termination of the services of 76 Resources, LLC. Termination payments under the Smith Agreement are generally contingent on a release of claims by 76 Resources, LLC. The Smith Agreement also includes customary confidentiality and six-month employee non-solicitation provisions.
If the Smith Agreement had been terminated by the Company for any reason other than as set out in the Smith Agreement, if 76 Resources, LLC terminated the Smith Agreement on the occurrence of a Triggering Event, or had a change of control of the Company occurred and within one year, either a Triggering Event occurred and 76 Resources, LLC terminated the Smith Agreement or 76 Resources, LLC’s engagement was terminated by the Company without the occurrence of a Triggering Event for any reason other than as set out in the Smith Agreement, effective as of June 30, 2025, 76 Resources, LLC (as ultimate successor in interest to KMSmith) would have been entitled to a payment of $375,000.
Agreements Regarding Messrs. Shah and Honan
As previously disclosed, on September 25, 2022, in connection with our entry into the Business Combination Agreement, Messrs. Shah and Honan (the “Covered Officers”) entered into employment agreements with a United States affiliate (the “U.S. Affiliate”) of the Company (the “Employment Agreements”). The Employment Agreements became effective upon the closing of the GXII Transaction, and will continue until either the Covered Officer or the U.S. Affiliate terminates the Covered Officer’s employment for any reason. Pursuant to the Employment Agreements, Mr. Shah continues to serve as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, and Mr. Honan continues to serve as the COO of the Company and serves as President of the U.S. Affiliate.
The Employment Agreement for Mr. Shah provided for an initial annual base salary of $220,000 per year, and Mr. Honan’s Employment Agreement provided for an initial annual base salary of $260,000 per year. The annual base salary rates for the Covered Officers are reviewed at least annually for potential increases. The base salary rates of Messrs. Shah and Honan were increased in fiscal 2023 to $250,000 for Mr. Shah and $280,000 for Mr. Honan. There were no increases in base salary rates for fiscal 2024 or 2025. The Employment Agreements also provide each of the Covered Officers with eligibility to participate in (1) any annual cash bonus plan and/or any long-term incentive compensation plan as may be established by the U.S. Affiliate or its affiliates, and (2) any employee benefit plan, program, or policy of the U.S. Affiliate or its affiliates as may be in effect for senior executives of the U.S. Affiliate or its affiliates generally. The Employment Agreements also include the following additional features: (1) severance benefits upon certain qualifying terminations of employment, consisting of: (a) for a qualifying termination of the Covered Officer’s employment by the U.S. Affiliate without Cause (as such term is defined in the Employment Agreements) that does not occur within two years after a Change in Control of the U.S. Affiliate (as defined in the Employment Agreements), certain accrued obligations, plus 12 months of salary continuation, and (b) for a qualifying termination of the Covered Officer’s employment by the U.S. Affiliate without Cause or by the Covered Officer for Good Reason (as such term is defined in the Employment Agreements) that occurs within two years after a Change in Control (a “Change in Control Termination”), certain accrued obligations, and a lump sum cash amount equal to two times the Covered Officer’s annual base salary as in effect at the time of such termination; and (2) a
95
requirement that each Covered Executive execute a customary release of claims in favor of the U.S. Affiliate to receive severance compensation. In connection with the Covered Officers entering into the Employment Agreements each Covered Officer also entered into a restrictive covenant agreement (a “Restrictive Covenant Agreement”). The Restrictive Covenant Agreements include customary restrictive covenants, including non-competition and non-solicitation obligations that remain in effect both during the employment term and for one year following termination of the Covered Officer’s employment other than a Change in Control Termination (in which case the period will be two years following such Change in Control Termination), as well as other customary restrictive covenants, such as confidentiality provisions.
Stock Options Under the 2017 Amended Long-Term Incentive Plan
In accordance with the 2017 Amended Long-Term Incentive Plan, the Company granted Options to its named executive officers during the Company’s 2025 fiscal year; no other equity-based awards were granted to the named executive officers during the 2025 fiscal year.
The following table sets forth the outstanding equity awards for each named executive officer at June 30, 2025. The Company has not granted full value stock-based awards to any of its named executive officers.
Outstanding Equity Awards at 2025 Fiscal Year-End
| Option Awards | ||||||||||||||||
| Name | Grant Date | Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Exercisable | Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Unexercisable | Option Exercise Price ($) | Option Expiration Date | |||||||||||
| Mark A. Smith | 03/27/2023 | 70,000 | — | $6.95 | 03/27/2026 | |||||||||||
| 02/15/2024 | 375,000 | — | 2.99 | 02/15/2029 | ||||||||||||
| 12/21/2024 | 150,000 | — | 1.40 | 12/21/2029 | ||||||||||||
| Scott Honan | 03/27/2023 | 40,000 | — | 6.95 | 03/27/2026 | |||||||||||
| 02/15/2024 | 250,000 | — | 2.99 | 02/15/2029 | ||||||||||||
| 12/21/2024 | 100,000 | — | 1.40 | 12/21/2029 | ||||||||||||
| Neal Shah | 03/27/2023 | 40,000 | — | 6.95 | 03/27/2026 | |||||||||||
| 02/15/2024 | 250,000 | — | 2.99 | 02/15/2029 | ||||||||||||
| 12/21/2024 | 100,000 | — | 1.40 | 12/21/2029 | ||||||||||||
Retirement Plan Benefits
Messrs. Honan and Shah are each eligible to participate in the Company’s 401(k) savings plan, which is designed to reward continued employment with the Company and assist participants with financial preparation for retirement. All amounts credited under the 401(k) savings plan relate to participant contributions. The Company does not currently make matching or other contributions to the 401(k) savings plan.
Termination and Change of Control Benefits
Except as described above, the Company is not a party to any plans or arrangements regarding the named executive officers under which they may receive enhanced or incremental compensation or benefits in the event of a change of control, termination of employment (as a result of resignation, retirement, change of control, etc.) or a change in responsibilities following a change of control. Options are generally subject to clawback provisions, and provide for post-employment exercise periods, pursuant to the terms of such awards and the 2017 Amended Long-Term Incentive Plan.
96
Practices Related to the Grant of Equity Awards
This
equity grant approach is used by the Board or Compensation Committee in order to best help ensure the grants are made only during an open
window, and after the release of the Company’s
During fiscal year 2025, we did not grant Options (or similar awards) to any of our named executive officers during the period beginning four business days before and ending one business day after the filing of any Company periodic report on Form 10-Q or Form 10-K, or the filing or furnishing of any Company Form 8-K, that disclosed any material non-public information.
Fiscal 2025 Director Compensation
One of the directors serving on the Board (Mr. Smith) is also a named executive officer. For a description of the compensation paid to Mr. Smith, see “Fiscal 2025 Summary Compensation Table” and the accompanying narrative provided above.
The following table sets forth all compensation the Company granted to our directors, other than Mr. Smith, for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2025:
| Name | Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($) | Option Awards ($)(1) | All Other Compensation ($) | Total ($) | ||||||||||||
| Michael J. Morris | $– | $63,000 | $– | $63,000 | ||||||||||||
| Nilsa Guerrero-Mahon | – | 63,000 | – | 63,000 | ||||||||||||
| David C. Beling | – | 42,000 | – | 42,000 | ||||||||||||
| Dean C. Kehler | – | 42,000 | – | 42,000 | ||||||||||||
| Michael G. Maselli | – | 42,000 | – | 42,000 | ||||||||||||
| Peter Oliver | – | 42,000 | – | 42,000 | ||||||||||||
| (1) | Reflects the grant date fair value of Options granted during the 2025 fiscal year, consisting of 75,000 Options each for Mr. Morris and Ms. Guerrero-Mahon, and 50,000 Options each for Messrs. Beling, Oliver, Kehler, and Maselli, in each case at an exercise price of $1.40 per share, computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. Assumptions used in the calculation of these amounts are described in Note 10b in the Company’s consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. These Options were fully vested on the grant date (December 23, 2024) and generally remain exercisable until five years after the grant date. |
For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2025, the directors of the Company did not receive any cash fees for serving on the Board. The directors of the Company have no standard compensation arrangements, or any other arrangements, with the Company, except as herein disclosed. Option grants are determined by the Board or Compensation
97
Committee on a discretionary basis each year. Executive officers of the Company who also act as directors of the Company do not receive any additional compensation for services rendered in such capacity. See “Fiscal 2025 Summary Compensation Table” above.
The aggregate number of Option awards outstanding at the end of fiscal year 2025 for each non-employee director who served during fiscal 2025 was as follows: Mr. Morris, 200,000 Options; Ms. Guerrero-Mahon 195,000 Options; Mr. Beling, 140,000 Options; Mr. Kehler, 100,000 Options; Mr. Maselli, 100,000 Options; and Mr. Oliver, 140,000 Options. As of June 30, 2025, all the above Options were 100% vested.
Description of the 2017 Amended Long-Term Incentive Plan
On January 19, 2024, NioCorp’s shareholders approved the adoption of the 2017 Amended Long-Term Incentive Plan. Under the 2017 Amended Long-Term Incentive Plan, the Board may in its discretion from time-to-time grant Options, share units (in the form of restricted share units (“RSUs”) and performance share units (“PSUs”)) and dividend equivalents to non-employee directors, employees and certain other service providers (as further described in the 2017 Amended Long-Term Incentive Plan) of the Company and affiliated entities selected by the Board. Subject to adjustment as provided in the 2017 Amended Long-Term Incentive Plan, the aggregate number of Common Shares that may be reserved for issuance to participants under the 2017 Amended Long-Term Incentive Plan, together with all other security-based compensation arrangements of the Company, may not exceed 10% of the issued and outstanding Common Shares from time to time, and the Common Shares reserved for issuance upon settlement of share units shall not exceed 5% of the issued and outstanding Common Shares from time to time. Further, the aggregate number of Common Shares reserved for issuance to any one participant under the 2017 Amended Long-Term Incentive Plan, together with all other security-based compensation arrangements of the Company, must not exceed 5% of the then issued and outstanding Common Shares (on a non-diluted basis). The maximum number of Common Shares (1) issued to insiders (for purposes of the Toronto Stock Exchange Company Manual) within any one-year period and (2) issuable to insiders at any time, under the 2017 Amended Long-Term Incentive Plan, or when combined with the Company’s other security-based compensation arrangements, will not exceed 10% of the number of the then issued and outstanding Common Shares.
The following table presents the burn rates for the 2017 Amended Long-Term Incentive Plan for the three most recent fiscal years:
| Fiscal Year Ending June 30, | Number of awards granted | Weighted average number of Common Shares outstanding | Burn rate | |||||||||||
| 2025 | 945,000 | 45,072,895 | 2.1% | |||||||||||
| 2024 | 1,625,000 | 34,320,024 | 4.7% | |||||||||||
| 2023 | 578,000 | 28,705,840 | 2.0% | |||||||||||
| (1) | During fiscal year 2023, the Company completed a 10-for-1 reverse stock split (the “Reverse Stock Split”). For purposes of comparability across fiscal years in this table, amounts in these columns with respect to fiscal years prior to 2023 represent the original amounts adjusted to reflect the Reverse Stock Split. With respect to the number of awards granted in fiscal 2023, any actual grants made prior to the Reverse Stock Split have also been adjusted. |
| ITEM 12. | SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS |
The following table sets forth the beneficial ownership of Common Shares of NioCorp as of September 11, 2025 (except where otherwise indicated), for the following: (1) each person who is known by NioCorp to beneficially own more than 5% of the outstanding shares of NioCorp’s Common Shares; (2) each of the named executive officers (as defined in the “Fiscal 2025 Summary Compensation Table,” above); (3) each of NioCorp’s directors; and (4) all directors and executive officers of NioCorp as a group.
Beneficial ownership of Common Shares in the table below is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC and includes voting or investment power with respect to the Common Shares. Common Shares that may be acquired by an individual or group within 60 days of September 11, 2025, pursuant to the exercise of Options, the exercise of Warrants, or the exchange of shares of Class B common stock of ECRC (formerly known as GXII), are deemed to be outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of such individual or group but are not deemed to be outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other person shown in the
98
table. Percentage of ownership is based on 77,757,089 Common Shares outstanding as of September 11, 2025. Unless otherwise noted in the table below, Options vested at the grant date.
Except as indicated in footnotes to this table, we believe that the shareholders named in this table have sole voting and investment power with respect to all Common Shares shown to be beneficially owned by them, based on information provided to us by such shareholders. Unless otherwise indicated, the address for each director and executive officer listed is: c/o NioCorp Developments Ltd., 7000 South Yosemite Street, Suite 115, Centennial, CO 80112.
| Name
and Address of Beneficial Owner | Position | Amount
and Nature of Beneficial Ownership (1) |
Percent of Common Shares | |||||||||
Mark A. Smith, PE, Esq. Highlands Ranch, Colorado, USA | Chief Executive Officer, President, Executive Chairman and Director | 3,316,452 | (2) | 4.21 | % | |||||||
Neal Shah Superior, Colorado, USA | Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary | 550,032 | (3) | * | ||||||||
Scott Honan Centennial, Colorado, USA | Chief Operating Officer | 530,762 | (4) | * | ||||||||
David C. Beling Grand Junction, Colorado, USA | Director | 229,013 | (5) | * | ||||||||
Anthony W. Fulton Lincoln, Nebraska, USA | Director | 251,209 | (6) | * | ||||||||
Nilsa Guerrero-Mahon Brighton, Colorado, USA | Director | 259,768 | (7) | * | ||||||||
| Dean
Kehler New York, New York, USA | Director | 3,708,811 | (8) | 4.56 | % | |||||||
Michael Maselli Pelham, New York, USA | Director | 655,235 | (9) | * | ||||||||
Peter Oliver Bunbury, Western Australia, Australia | Lead Director | 160,400 | (10) | * | ||||||||
| All current directors, executive officers and named executive officers as a group (11 persons) | 10,228,610 | 12.06 | % | |||||||||
| Kenneth Griffin
Miami, Florida, USA | 3,903,395 | (11) | 5.02 | % | ||||||||
* Represents ownership of less than 1%.
| (1) | Calculated in accordance with Rule 13d-3 of the Exchange Act. |
| (2) | Mr. Smith beneficially owns 2,272,018 outstanding Common Shares. In addition, he beneficially owns 321,934 Common Shares issuable upon exercise of: (i) 46,801 Warrants each exercisable for one Common Share at a price of $3.54 until December 22, 2025; (ii) 183,422 Warrants each exercisable for one Common Share at a price of $1.75 until November 13, 2026; and (iii) 91,711 Warrants each exercisable for one Common Share at a price of $2.07 until November 13, 2029. He also beneficially owns 722,500 Common Shares issuable upon exercise of vested Options comprised of the following: (i) on March 27, 2023, Mr. Smith was granted 70,000 Options each exercisable for one Common Share for a period of three years at a price of $6.95 per Common Share; (ii) on February 15, 2024, Mr. Smith was granted 375,000 Options each exercisable for one Common Share for a period of five years at a price of $2.99; (iii) on December 23, 2024, Mr. Smith was granted 150,000 Options each exercisable for one Common Shares for a period of five years at a price of $1.40; and (iv) on August 18, 2025, Mr. Smith was granted 375,000 Options each exercisable for One Common Share for a period of five years at a price of $4.35 which will vest over a period of two years with 34% having vested at this time. |
| (3) | Mr. Shah beneficially owns 65,671 outstanding Common Shares. He beneficially owns 9,361 Common Shares issuable upon exercise of 9,361 Warrants each exercisable for one Common Share at a price of $3.54 until December 22, 2025. In addition, he beneficially owns 475,000 Common Shares issuable upon exercise of vested Options comprised of the following: (i) on March 27, 2023, Mr. Shah was granted 40,000 Options each exercisable for one Common Share for a period of three years at a price of $6.95 per Common Share; (ii) on February 15, 2024, Mr. Shah was granted 250,000 Options each exercisable for one Common Share for a period of five years at a price of $2.99; (iii) on December 23, 2024, Mr. Shah was granted 100,000 Options each exercisable for one Common Share for a period of five years at a price |
99
of $1.40; and (iv) on August 18, 2025, Mr. Shah was granted 250,000 Options each exercisable for One Common Share for a period of five years at a price of $4.35 which will vest over a period of two years with 34% having vested at this time.
| (4) | Mr. Honan beneficially owns 55,762 outstanding Common Shares. In addition, he beneficially owns 475,000 Common Shares issuable upon exercise of vested Options comprised of the following: (i) on March 27, 2023, Mr. Honan was granted 40,000 Options each exercisable for one Common Share for a period of three years at a price of $6.95 per Common Share; (ii) on February 15, 2024, Mr. Honan was granted 250,000 Options each exercisable for one Common Share for a period of five years at a price of $2.99; (iii) on December 23, 2024, Mr. Honan was granted 100,000 Options each exercisable for one Common Share for a period of five years at a price of $1.40; and (iv) on August 18, 2025, Mr. Honan was granted 250,000 Options each exercisable for One Common Share for a period of five years at a price of $4.35 which will vest over a period of two years with 34% having vested at this time. |
| (5) | Mr. Beling beneficially owns 72,013 outstanding Common Shares. In addition, he beneficially owns 157,000 Common Shares issuable upon exercise of vested Options comprised of the following: (i) on March 27, 2023, Mr. Beling was granted 40,000 Options each exercisable for one Common Share for a period of three years at a price of $6.95 per Common Share; (ii) on February 15, 2024, Mr. Beling was granted 50,000 Options each exercisable for one Common Share for a period of five years at a price of $2.99; (iii) on December 23, 2024, Mr. Beling was granted 50,000 Options each exercisable for one Common Share for a period of five years at a price of $1.40; and (iv) on August 18, 2025, Mr. Beling was granted 50,000 Options each exercisable for One Common Share for a period of five years at a price of $4.35 which will vest over a period of two years with 34% having vested at this time. |
| (6) | Mr. Fulton beneficially owns 179,350 Common Shares. He shares both voting and investment power with respect to 2,276 of such Common Shares with members of his family. In addition, he beneficially owns 54,859 Common Shares issuable upon exercise of 49,058 NioCorp Assumed Warrants each exercisable for 1.11829212 Common Shares at a price of $11.50 until March 17, 2028. He also beneficially owns 17,000 Common Shares issuable upon exercise of vested Options comprised of: (i) on August 18, 2025, Mr. Fulton was granted 50,000 Options each exercisable for One Common Share for a period of five years at a price of $4.35 which will vest over a period of two years with 34% having vested at this time. He shares both voting and investment power with respect to 12,335 Common Shares issuable upon exercise of 11,032 of such NioCorp Assumed Warrants with members of his family. |
| (7) | Ms. Guerrero-Mahon beneficially owns 46,068 Common Shares. In addition, she beneficially owns 213,700 Common Shares issuable upon exercise of vested Options comprised of the following: (i) on March 27, 2023, Ms. Guerrero-Mahon was granted 45,000 Options each exercisable for one Common Share for a period of three years at a price of $6.95 per Common Share; (ii) on February 15, 2024, Ms. Guerrero-Mahon was granted 75,000 Options each exercisable for one Common Share for a period of five years at a price of $2.99; (iii) on December 23, 2024, Ms. Guerrero-Mahon was granted 75,000 Options each exercisable for one Common Share for a period of five years at a price of $1.40; and (iv) on August 18, 2025, Ms. Guerrero-Mahon was granted 55,000 Options each exercisable for One Common Share for a period of five years at a price of $4.35 which will vest over a period of two years with 34% having vested at this time. |
| (8) | Mr. Kehler beneficially owns 134,580 Common Shares, and 1,441,290 Common Shares issuable upon the exchange of Vested Shares (as defined herein). He shares both voting and investment power with respect to 318,470 of such Vested Shares with U.S. Trust Company of Delaware, as co-trustee of the Elizabeth Kehler 2012 Family Trust under Declaration of Trust dated December 12, 2012 (the “Elizabeth Kehler Trust”). In addition, he beneficially owns 2,015,941 Common Shares issuable upon exercise of the following: (i) 1,657,057 Private Warrants (as defined herein) exercisable for an aggregate of up to 1,853,073 Common Shares held by Mr. Kehler; (ii) 78,003 Warrants each exercisable for one Common Share at a price of $3.54 until December 22, 2025; (iii) 56,577 Warrants each exercisable for one Common Share at a price of $1.75 until November 13, 2026; and (iv) 28,288 Warrants each exercisable for one Common Share at a price of $2.07 until November 13, 2029. He also beneficially owns 117,000 Common Shares issuable upon exercise of vested Options comprised of the following: (i) on February 15, 2024, Mr. Kehler was granted 50,000 Options each exercisable for one Common Share for a period of five years at a price of $2.99; (ii) on December 23, 2024, Mr. Kehler was granted 50,000 Options each exercisable for one Common Share for a period of five years at a price of $1.40; and (iii) on August 18, 2025, Mr. Kehler was granted 50,000 Options each exercisable for One Common Share for a period of five years at a price of $4.35 which will vest over a period of two years with 34% having vested at this time. The total does not include Common Shares that may be issuable upon exchange of (i) 417,030 Tranche I Earnout Shares (as defined herein) held by Mr. Kehler, (ii) 417,030 Tranche II Earnout Shares (as defined herein) held by Mr. Kehler, (iii) 118,284 Tranche I Earnout Shares held by the Elizabeth Kehler Trust; and (iv) 118,284 Tranche II Earnout Shares held by the Elizabeth Kehler Trust. |
| (9) | Mr. Maselli beneficially owns 323,085 Common Shares. In addition, Mr. Maselli beneficially owns 215,150 Common Shares issuable upon exercise of 192,392 Private Warrants held by Mr. Maselli. He also beneficially owns 117,000 Common Shares issuable upon exercise of vested Options comprised of the following: (i) on February 15, 2024, Mr. Maselli was granted 50,000 Options each exercisable for one Common Share for a period of five years at a price of $2.99; (ii) on December 23, 2024, Mr. Maselli was granted 50,000 Options each exercisable for one Common Share for a period of five years at a price of $1.40 and (iii) on August 18, 2025, Mr. Maselli was granted 50,000 Options each exercisable for One Common Share for a period of five years at a price of $4.35 which will vest over a period of two years with 34% |
100
having vested at this time. The total does not include Common Shares that may be issuable upon exchange of (i) 119,998 Tranche I Earnout Shares held by Mr. Maselli and (ii) 119,998 Tranche II Earnout Shares held by Mr. Maselli.
| (10) | Mr. Oliver beneficially owns 160,400 Common Shares issuable upon exercise of vested Options comprised of the following: (i) on March 27, 2023, Mr. Oliver was granted 40,000 Options each exercisable for one Common Share for a period of three years at a price of $6.95 per Common Share; (ii) on February 15, 2024, Mr. Oliver was granted 50,000 Options each exercisable for one Common Share for a period of five years at a price of $2.99; (iii) on December 23, 2024, Mr. Oliver was granted 50,000 Options each exercisable for one Common Share for a period of five years at a price of $1.40 and (iv) on August 18, 2025, Mr. Oliver was granted 60,000 Options each exercisable for One Common Share for a period of five years at a price of $4.35 which will vest over a period of two years with 34% having vested at this time. |
| (11) | As reported by Kenneth Griffin on a Schedule 13G jointly filed with the SEC on July 25, 2025 by Mr. Griffin, Citadel Advisors LLC (“Citadel Advisors”), Citadel Advisors Holdings LP (“CAH”), Citadel GP LLC (“CGP”), Citadel Securities LLC (“Citadel Securities”), Citadel Securities Group LP (“CALC4”) and Citadel Securities GP LLC (“CSGP”) with respect to Common Shares owned by Citadel Multi-Strategy Equities (Ireland) Designated Activity Company, an Ireland company (“CSMI”) and Citadel Securities. Citadel Advisors is the portfolio manager for CMSI. CAH is the sole member of Citadel Advisors. CGP is the general partner of CAH. CALC4 is the non-member manager of Citadel Securities. CSGP is the general partner of CALC4. Mr. Griffin is the President and Chief Executive Officer of CGP, and owns a controlling interest in CGP and CSGP. |
EQUITY COMPENSATION PLANS
The Company has maintained equity compensation plans under which Options have been granted. Option grants have been determined by the Company’s directors and are only provided in compliance with applicable laws and regulatory policy. The following information is provided with respect to compensation plans (including individual compensation arrangements) under which equity securities were authorized for issuance as of June 30, 2025.
| Equity Compensation Plan Information | ||||||||||||
| Plan Category | Number of Securities | Weighted-Average Exercise Price of Outstanding | Number of Securities Remaining Available for Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans (Excluding Securities Reflected in Second Column) | |||||||||
| Equity Compensation Plans Approved by Security Holders (1) | 3,020,000 | $3.09 | 2,829,119(2) | |||||||||
| Equity Compensation Plans Not Approved by Security Holders | - | - | - | |||||||||
| Total(3) | 3,020,000 | $3.09 | 2,829,119 | |||||||||
| (1) | Represents Options granted pursuant to the 2017 Amended Long-Term Incentive Plan. | |
|
|
(2) | Generally, the aggregate number of Common Shares reserved for issuance to participants under the 2017 Amended Long-Term Incentive Plan, together with all other security-based compensation arrangements of the Company may not exceed 10% of the issued and outstanding Common Shares from time to time, and the Common Shares reserved for issuance upon settlement of share units shall not exceed 5% of the issued and outstanding Common Shares from time to time. Common Shares subject to any grant (or any portion thereof) that are issued upon exercise or settlement, forfeited, surrendered, cancelled, unearned, or otherwise terminated will again be available for grant under the 2017 Amended Long-Term Incentive Plan. |
| (3) | As of June 30, 2025, there were: (i) 3,020,000 outstanding securities awarded under the 2017 Amended Long-Term Incentive Plan representing 5.16% of the Company’s currently issued and outstanding Common Shares; and (ii) 2,829,119 remaining securities available for grant representing 4.84% of the Company’s currently issued and outstanding Common Shares. |
Performance Graph
The following graph compares total cumulative shareholder return for $100 invested in Common Shares from July 1, 2020, to June 30, 2025, with cumulative total returns for the S&P/TSX Composite Index and S&P/TSX Mining Index:
101
Overall, the Company’s cumulative return for the five-year period ended below the range of returns for the two selected indices. As an exploration stage company, executive officer compensation has not historically been adjusted to reflect share performance trends. Compensation to executive officers remained flat from 2013 through February 2023, except for increases supported by additional job responsibilities and/or job promotions. Effective September 1, 2019, the Board approved a 10% base rate increase for all NioCorp employees and effective April 1, 2023, the Compensation Committee approved a base rate average increase of 12% for all NioCorp employees. There were no salary increases granted during fiscal years 2025 or 2024.
| ITEM 13. | CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE |
The following sets forth certain information regarding transactions between the Company (and its subsidiaries) and its officers, directors, and significant shareholders. There have been no other transactions since the end of the Company’s most recently completed fiscal year and there are no currently proposed transactions in which the Company was or is to be a participant and the amount involved exceeds $120,000, and in which any related person (for purposes of Item 404 of Regulation S-K) had or will have a direct or indirect material interest.
Loan Transactions:
Mr. Smith is our Chief Executive Officer, President, Executive Chairman, and Director. On September 11, 2024, the Company and Mr. Smith entered into the Smith Loan Agreement pursuant to which Mr. Smith agreed to make available to the Company a non-revolving, multiple draw credit facility of up to $2,000,000. The Smith Loan expired on June 30, 2025, was non-revolving, and amounts paid back under the terms of the Smith Loan Agreement did not again become available for drawdowns at the request of the Company.
The Company paid interest to Mr. Smith on amounts outstanding under the Smith Loan at a rate equal to 10% per annum, calculated monthly in arrears, through to the date of repayment of the Loan. Mr. Smith also received an establishment fee equal to 2.5% of the amount of each drawdown payable at the time of the drawdown as consideration of the advancement of such drawdown. Any outstanding balance on the Loan, including accrued interest, were immediately due and payable by the Company on the earlier of the date of expiration of the Smith Loan Agreement and the occurrence of an event of default thereunder (the “Due Date”). The Company could repay the Smith Loan at any time without notice and without penalty, but any amount of principal or interest repaid by the Company prior to the Due Date will be subject to an early payment fee of 2.5% of the value of any such payment. Amounts outstanding under the Smith Loan Agreement were secured by all of the Company’s assets pursuant to a general security agreement between the Company and Mr. Smith, dated September 11, 2024.
Through October 30, 2024, the Company borrowed a total of $504,000 under the Smith Loan and the largest aggregate amount of principal outstanding under the Smith Loan Agreement during the period ended June 30, 2025, was $504,000. The Company subsequently repaid $508,200, representing the balance of the principal outstanding
102
under the Smith Loan plus accrued interest, and also repaid $40,850 related to loan origination fees payable. As of June 30, 2025, there was no principal amount or accounts payable outstanding under the Smith Loan.
December 2023 Private Placement
On December 22, 2023, the Company closed a non-brokered private placement (the “December 2023 Private Placement”) and issued an aggregate of 413,432 units of the Company (the “December 2023 Units”). Each December 2023 Unit consisted of one Common Share and one Warrant (the “December 2023 Warrants”). Each December 2023 Warrant is exercisable for one Common Share at a price of $3.54 until December 22, 2025. Certain of the Company’s officers and directors, including Messrs. Kehler, Smith and Shah, subscribed to purchase an aggregate of 138,845 December 2023 Units in the December 2023 Private Placement. Each officer and director of the Company who subscribed to purchase December 2023 Units in the December 2023 Private Placement paid a purchase price of $3.205 per unit (the “December 2023 Insider Unit Price”) upon the closing of the December 2023 Private Placement. The December 2023 Insider Unit Price included $0.125 per December 2023 Warrant underlying each December 2023 Unit purchased by officers and directors of the Company. Messrs. Kehler, Smith and Shah purchased 78,003 December 2023 Units, 46,801 December 2023 Units, and 9,361 December 2023 Units, respectively, for aggregate purchase prices of $249,999.62, $149,997.21, and $30,002.01, respectively. The remaining investors in the December 2023 Private Placement, who are not affiliated with the Company but with whom the Company had a pre-existing relationship, subscribed to purchase an aggregate of 274,587 December 2023 Units at a purchase price per December 2023 Unit of $3.08, which is equal to the consolidated closing bid price for the Common Shares as reported by Nasdaq on December 13, 2023. Gross proceeds to the Company from the December 2023 Private Placement were approximately $1.29 million.
November 2024 Private Placement
On November 13, 2024, the Company closed a non-brokered private placement (the “November 2024 Private Placement”) and issued an aggregate of 2,199,602 units of the Company (the “November 2024 Units”). Each November 2024 Unit consists of one Common Share, one Warrant (collectively, the “Series A Private Warrants”) to purchase one Common Share and one-half of one Warrant to purchase one-half of one Common Share (the “Series B Private Warrants” and, together with the Series A Private Warrants, the “November 2024 Private Warrants”). Each Series A Private Warrant is exercisable into one Common Share (a “Series A Warrant Share”) at an exercise price of $1.75 per Series A Warrant Share at any time on or after the date of issuance until November 13, 2026. Each Series B Private Warrant is exercisable into one Common Share (a “Series B Warrant Share”) at an exercise price of $2.07 per Series B Warrant Share at any time beginning six months and one day from the date of issuance until November 13, 2029. Messrs. Kehler and Smith subscribed to purchase an aggregate of 239,999 November 2024 Units in the November 2024 Private Placement and paid a purchase price of $1.7675 per November 2024 Unit (the “November 2024 Insider Unit Price”) upon the closing of the November 2024 Private Placement. The November 2024 Insider Unit Price included $0.125 per November 2024 Private Warrant underlying each November 2024 Unit purchased by directors of the Company. Messrs. Kehler and Smith purchased 56,577 November 2024 Units and 183,422 November 2024 Units, respectively, for aggregate purchase prices of approximately $100,000 and $324,198, respectively. The remaining investors in the November 2024 Private Placement, who are not affiliated with the Company but with whom the Company had a pre-existing relationship, subscribed to purchase an aggregate of 1,959,603 November 2024 Units at a purchase price per November 2024 Unit of $1.57. Gross proceeds to the Company from the November 2024 Private Placement were approximately $3.5 million.
Review, Approval or Ratification of Related Person Transactions
Other than as described below, the Company does not currently have in place any specific policy or procedure in respect of the review, approval or ratification of any transaction required to be reported under Item 404(a) of Regulation S-K. Sections 147-153 of the BCBCA set out rules and procedures applicable to all British Columbia corporations, pursuant to which a director presented with a resolution in respect of any matter (including an equity issuance) in respect of which he/she has an interest must disclose that interest in writing to the corporation’s board of directors prior to the approval of such matter. This procedure ensures that each equity issuance to a director or officer of the Company is approved by all directors of the Company not involved in such sale. All loan transactions from directors and officers are typically subject to review and approval by the Board prior to acceptance and are documented in the meeting minutes or resolutions related to same. Under its charter, the Audit Committee is responsible for reviewing and approving any related party transaction in advance of such transaction, unless the
103
Chief Financial Officer or General Counsel determines that it is not practicable to wait until the next Audit Committee meeting, in which case the related party transaction will be submitted to the Chair of the Audit Committee, who will have delegated authority to act between Audit Committee meetings.
Director Independence
The Company’s Board consists of Messrs. Smith, Beling, Fulton, Oliver, Kehler, and Maselli and Ms. Guerrero-Mahon. The Company utilizes the definition of “independent” as it is set forth in Nasdaq Listing Rule 5605(a)(2) (“Rule 5605(a)(2)”) and National Instrument 52-110 Audit Committees (“NI 52-110”). Further, the Board considers all relevant facts and circumstances in its determination of independence of all members of the Board (including any relationships). Currently, Messrs. Beling, Fulton, Oliver, Kehler, and Maselli and Ms. Guerrero-Mahon are considered independent directors. Mr. Michael J. Morris, who served as a director of the Company during fiscal 2025, was previously determined by the Board to be an independent director.
| ITEM 14. | PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES |
The following table presents fees for professional services rendered by Deloitte & Touche LLP for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2025 and Deloitte & Touche LLP and BDO USA, P.C. for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024 for the audit of the Company’s annual consolidated financial statements and review of consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s filings and fees billed for other services rendered by the firms during those periods.
| Fiscal Year Ending June 30, | Audit Fees(1) ($) | Audit-Related Fees(2) ($) | Tax Fees(3) ($) | All Other Fees(4) ($) | ||||
| 2025 | ||||||||
| Deloitte | 601,274 | 601,309 | 94,016 | — | ||||
| 2024 | ||||||||
| Deloitte | 1,092,834 | 34,125 | — | — | ||||
| BDO | 132,500 | 95,599 | 48,263 | — |
| (1) | “Audit Fees” consist of fees billed, or to be billed, for professional services rendered for the audit of our annual consolidated financial statements and reviews of our interim financial statements included in quarterly reports and services normally provided by our independent registered public accounting firm in connection with statutory filings. |
| (2) | “Audit-Related Fees” consist of fees billed, or to be billed, related to agreed-upon procedures and services, including for comfort letters, normally provided by our independent registered public accounting firm in connection with debt offerings or regulatory filings. |
| (3) | “Tax Fees” include fees for all tax services other than those included in “Audit Fees” and “Audit-Related Fees.” This category includes fees for tax compliance, tax planning, and tax advice. Tax planning and tax advice include assistance with tax audits and appeals, tax advice related to mergers and acquisitions, and requests for rulings or technical advice from tax authorities. For the financial year ended June 30, 2025, these tax services included the preparation of Canadian and U.S. federal and state tax returns and tax planning and tax advice services. |
| (4) | “All Other Fees” includes all other non-audit services. |
Pre-approval Policies
The policy of the Audit Committee has been to pre-approve all audit, audit-related and non-audit services performed by our independent auditors and to subsequently review the actual fees and expenses paid to our independent auditors. Accordingly, the Audit Committee pre-approved all audit, audit-related and non-audit services performed by Deloitte & Touche LLP and BDO USA, P.C. and subsequently reviewed the actual fees and expenses paid for these services. The Audit Committee has determined that the fees paid to Deloitte & Touche LLP for services are compatible with maintaining Deloitte & Touche LLP’s independence as our auditor. All of the services provided during the years ended June 30, 2025 and 2024, were approved by the Audit Committee pursuant to paragraph (c)(7)(i)(C) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X.
104
PART IV
| ITEM 15. | EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES |
The following documents are filed as a part of this report:
Financial Statements
| (1) | The Consolidated Financial Statements, together with the report thereon of Deloitte & Touche LLP, dated September 11, 2025 are included as part of Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data,” commencing on page 59 above. |
| Page | |||
| Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firms (Deloitte & Touche LLP; Denver, Colorado; PCAOB ID#34) |
54 | ||
| Consolidated Balance Sheets | 56 | ||
| Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss | 57 | ||
| Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows | 58 | ||
| Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ (Deficit) Equity and Redeemable Noncontrolling Interest | 59 | ||
| Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements | 60 |
| (a) | Exhibits |
Exhibit No. |
Title | |
| 2.1(1)** | Business Combination Agreement, dated September 25, 2022, by and among NioCorp Developments Ltd., GX Acquisition Corp. II and Big Red Merger Sub Ltd | |
| 3.1(2) | Notice of Articles of NioCorp Developments Ltd., dated April 5, 2016 | |
| 3.2(2) | Articles of NioCorp Developments Ltd., as amended, effective as of January 27, 2015 | |
| 3.3(3) | Amendment to Articles, effective March 17, 2023 | |
| 4.1(4) | Convertible Security Funding Agreement, dated February 16, 2021, between the Company and Lind Global Asset Management III, LLC | |
| 4.2(5) | Amendment #1 to Convertible Security Funding Agreement, dated December 2, 2021, between the Company and Lind Global Asset Management III, LLC | |
| 4.3(6) | Waiver and Consent Agreement, dated September 25, 2022, between NioCorp Developments Ltd. and Lind Global Asset Management III, LLC | |
| 4.4(7) | Form of Lind Contingent Consent Warrants | |
| 4.5(1) | Sponsor Support Agreement, dated as of September 25, 2022, by and among GX Acquisition Corp. II, NioCorp Developments Ltd., GX Sponsor II LLC, in its capacity as a shareholder of GX Acquisition Corp. II, and certain other shareholders of GX Acquisition Corp. II | |
| 4.6(8) | Joinder to Sponsor Support Agreement, dated as of March 17, 2023, by and among NioCorp Developments Ltd. and each of the Holders party thereto | |
| 4.7(3) | Amended and Restated Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of March 17, 2023, by and among NioCorp Developments Ltd., GX Acquisition Corp. II, GX Sponsor II LLC, certain holders of the common shares of the NioCorp Developments Ltd. listed on Schedule 1 thereto, certain current and former stockholders of GX Acquisition Corp. II, and other persons and entities listed on Schedule 2 thereto | |
| 4.8(3) | Registration Rights Agreement Joinder, dated as of March 17, 2023, by and among NioCorp Developments Ltd. and each of the parties listed on Schedule A thereto | |
| 4.9(3) | Exchange Agreement, dated as of March 17, 2023, by and among NioCorp Developments Ltd., GX Acquisition Corp. II and GX Sponsor II LLC | |
| 4.10(8) | Joinder to Exchange Agreement, dated as of March 17, 2023, by and among NioCorp Developments Ltd., Elk Creek Resources Corp (f/k/a GX Acquisition Corp. II) and each of the Holders party thereto |
105
| 4.11(9) | Warrant Agreement, dated March 17, 2021, by and between GX Acquisition Corp. II and Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company | |
| 4.12(3) | Assignment, Assumption and Amendment Agreement, dated as of March 17, 2023, by and among GX Acquisition Corp. II, NioCorp Developments Ltd., Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company, as the existing Warrant Agent, and Computershare Inc. and its affiliate Computershare Trust Company, N.A., as the successor Warrant Agent | |
| 4.13(3) | Form of Warrant (included in Exhibit 4.12) | |
| 4.14(10) | Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of January 26, 2023, by and between NioCorp Developments Ltd. and YA II PN, Ltd. | |
| 4.15(11) | Form of Subscription Agreement in respect of units issued in September 2023 | |
| 4.16(11) | Form of Warrants issued in September 2023 | |
| 4.17(12) | Form of Subscription Agreement in respect of units issued in December 2023 | |
| 4.18(12) | Form of Warrants issued in December 2023 | |
| 4.19(13) | Securities Purchase Agreement, dated as of April 11, 2024, by and between NioCorp Developments Ltd. and each of YA II PN, Ltd. and Lind Global Fund II LP | |
| 4.20(13) | Form of Common Stock Purchase Warrant (included in Exhibit 4.19) | |
| 4.21(13) | Global Guaranty Agreement, dated as of April 11, 2024, by Elk Creek Resources Corporation and 0896800 B.C. Ltd. | |
| 4.22(13) | Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of April 11, 2024, by and between NioCorp Developments Ltd. and each of YA II PN, Ltd. and Lind Global Fund II LP | |
| 4.23(14) | Form of Subscription Agreement in respect of units issued in June 2024 | |
| 4.24(14) | Form of Warrants issued in June 2024 | |
| 4.25(15) | Underwriting Agreement, dated as of November 3, 2024, by and between NioCorp Developments Ltd. and Maxim Group LLC | |
| 4.26(15) | Warrant Agency Agreement, dated as of November 5, 2024, by and between NioCorp Developments Ltd., Computershare Inc. and Computershare Trust Company, N.A. | |
| 4.27(15) | Form of November 2024 Series A Public Warrant | |
| 4.28(15) | Form of November 2024 Series B Public Warrant | |
| 4.29(16) | Form of Subscription Agreement in respect of units issued in November 2024 | |
| 4.30(16) | Form of November 2024 Series A Private Warrant | |
| 4.31(16) | Form of November 2024 Series B Private Warrant | |
| 4.32(17) | Underwriting Agreement, dated as of January 29, 2025, by and between NioCorp Developments Ltd. and Maxim Group LLC | |
| 4.33(17) | Form of January 2025 Series A Warrant | |
| 4.34(17) | Form of January 2025 Series B Warrant | |
| 4.35(18) | Underwriting Agreement, dated as of April 17, 2025, by and between NioCorp Developments Ltd. and Maxim Group LLC | |
| 4.36(18) | Form of April 2025 Pre-Funded Warrant | |
| 4.37 | Description of Securities | |
| 10.1(2)# | Consulting Agreement, dated May 13, 2014, between the Company and KMSmith, LLC | |
| 10.2(19)# | Amendment to Contract, dated September 1, 2019, between the Company and KMSmith, LLC | |
| 10.3(19)# | Contract Assignment and Novation Agreement, dated as of August 31, 2020, among the Company, KMSmith, LLC and 76 Resources, Inc. | |
| 10.4(20)# | Contract Assignment and Novation Agreement, dated as of August 1, 2021, among the Company, 76 Resources, Inc. and 76 Resources, LLC | |
| 10.5(21)# | Amendment to Contract, dated April 1, 2023, between the Company and 76 Resources, LLC | |
| 10.6(22)* | Offtake agreement, dated June 13, 2016, between the Company and CMC Cometals, a division of Commercial Metals Company | |
| 10.7(23) | Amendment No. 1 to Offtake Agreement, dated April 13, 2020, between the Company and Traxys North America LLC, as assignee | |
| 10.8(24) | Offtake agreement with ThyssenKrupp Metallurgical Products GmbH | |
| 10.9(19)*, ** | Woltemath 003J Amended and Restated Option to Purchase, dated January 4, 2017, among ECRC and Victor L. and Juanita E. Woltemath | |
| 10.10(19)*, ** | Woltemath 003J Extension to Option to Purchase, dated December 23, 2019, among ECRC and Victor L. and Juanita E. Woltemath | |
| 10.11*, ** | Woltemath 003J Second Extension to Option to Purchase, dated December 9, 2024, between ECRC and Juanita E. Woltemath | |
| 10.12(10) | Standby Equity Purchase Agreement, dated as of January 26, 2023, by and between NioCorp Developments Ltd. and YA II PN, Ltd. | |
| 10.13(25) | Amendment #1 to Standby Equity Purchase Agreement, dated as of May 3, 2024, by and between NioCorp Developments Ltd. and YA II PN, Ltd. | |
| 10.14(3)# | Form of Director and Officer Indemnification Agreement |
106
| 10.15(1)# | Employment Agreement, dated as of September 25, 2022, by and between Elk Creek Resources Corporation and Neal Shah | |
| 10.16(1)# | Employment Agreement, dated as of September 25, 2022, by and between Elk Creek Resources Corporation and Scott Honan | |
| 10.17(1)# | Employment Agreement, dated as of September 25, 2022, by and between Elk Creek Resources Corporation and Jim Sims | |
| 10.18(1)# | Form of Restrictive Covenant Agreement | |
| 10.19(26)# | NioCorp Developments Ltd. Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended | |
| 10.20(27) | Loan Agreement, dated as of September 11, 2024, between the Company and Mark Smith | |
| 10.21(27) | Security Agreement, dated as of September 11, 2024, between the Company and Mark Smith | |
| 10.22(28) | Placement Agency Agreement, dated as of July 17, 2025, by and between NioCorp Developments Ltd. and Maxim Group LLC | |
| 19.1(7) | NioCorp Developments Ltd. Insider Trading Policy | |
| 21.1 | Subsidiaries of NioCorp Developments Ltd. | |
| 23.1 | Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP | |
| 23.3 | Consent of Dahrouge Geological Consulting USA Ltd. | |
| 23.4 | Consent of Understood Mineral Resources Ltd. | |
| 23.5 | Consent of Optimize Group Inc. | |
| 23.6 | Consent of Tetra Tech | |
| 23.7 | Consent of Adrian Brown Consultants Inc. | |
| 23.8 | Consent of Magemi Mining Inc. | |
| 23.9 | Consent of L3 Process Development | |
| 23.10 | Consent of Olsson | |
| 23.11 | Consent of A2GC | |
| 23.12 | Consent of Metallurgy Concept Solutions | |
| 23.13 | Consent of Scott Honan, M.Sc., SME-RM, NioCorp | |
| 23.14 | Consent of Dumas Contracting Ltd. | |
| 23.15 | Consent of Mahmood Khwaja, P.E., CDM Smith | |
| 23.16 | Consent of Wynand Marx, M.Eng., BBE Consulting | |
| 31.1 | Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | |
| 31.2 | Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | |
| 32.1 | Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | |
| 32.2 | Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | |
| 96.1(29) | S-K 1300 Elk Creek Technical Report Summary | |
| 97.1(7) | Compensation Clawback Policy | |
| 101.INS(30) | XBRL Instance Document | |
| 101.SCH(30) | XBRL Taxonomy Extension – Schema | |
| 101.CAL(30) | XBRL Taxonomy Extension – Calculations | |
| 101.DEF(30) | XBRL Taxonomy Extension – Definitions | |
| 101.LAB(30) | XBRL Taxonomy Extension – Labels | |
| 101.PRE(30) | XBRL Taxonomy Extension – Presentations | |
| 104 | Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as Inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101) |
| # | Management compensation plan, arrangement or agreement. |
| * | Portions of this exhibit have been omitted pursuant to Item 601(b)(10)(iv) of Regulation S-K, which portions will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request. |
| ** | Certain exhibits to this agreement have been omitted pursuant to Item 601(a)(5) of Regulation S-K. A copy of any omitted exhibit will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request. |
| (1) | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000-55710) filed with the SEC on September 29, 2022 and incorporated herein by reference. |
| (2) | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Draft Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 377-01354) submitted to the SEC on July 26, 2016 and incorporated herein by reference. |
| (3) | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-41655) filed with the SEC on March 17, 2023 and incorporated herein by reference. |
107
| (4) | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000-55710) filed with the SEC on February 17, 2021 and incorporated herein by reference. |
| (5) | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 000-55710) filed with the SEC on February 4, 2022 and incorporated herein by reference. |
| (6) | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-4 (Registration No. 333-268227) filed with the SEC on November 7, 2022 and incorporated herein by reference. |
| (7) | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 001-41655) filed with the SEC on September 23, 2024 and incorporated herein by reference. |
| (8) | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-271268) filed with the SEC on April 14, 2023 and incorporated herein by reference. |
| (9) | Previously filed as an exhibit to Elk Creek Resources Corp.’s (f/k/a GX Acquisition Corp. II) Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-40226) filed with the SEC on March 22, 2021 and incorporated herein by reference. |
| (10) | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000-55710) filed with the SEC on January 27, 2023 and incorporated herein by reference. |
| (11) | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-41655) filed with the SEC on September 1, 2023 and incorporated herein by reference. |
| (12) | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-41655) filed with the SEC on December 20, 2023 and incorporated herein by reference. |
| (13) | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-41655) filed with the SEC on April 12, 2024 and incorporated herein by reference. |
| (14) | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-41655) filed with the SEC on June 24, 2024 and incorporated herein by reference. |
| (15) | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-41655) filed with the SEC on November 5, 2024 and incorporated herein by reference. |
| (16) | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-41655) filed with the SEC on November 13, 2024 and incorporated herein by reference. |
| (17) | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-41655) filed with the SEC on January 31, 2025 and incorporated herein by reference |
| (18) | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-41655) filed with the SEC on April 21, 2025 and incorporated herein by reference |
| (19) | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 000-55710) filed with the SEC on September 16, 2020 and incorporated herein by reference. |
| (20) | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 000-55710) filed with the SEC on September 8, 2021 and incorporated herein by reference. |
| (21) | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-3 on Form S-1 (File No. 333-271268) filed with the SEC on August 22, 2023 and incorporated herein by reference. |
| (22) | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-213451) filed with the SEC on September 2, 2016 and incorporated herein by reference. |
| (23) | Previously filed as an exhibit to Amendment No. 1 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A (File No. 000-55710) filed with the SEC on October 31, 2022 and incorporated herein by reference. |
| (24) | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 000-55710) filed with the SEC on August 29, 2017 and incorporated herein by reference. |
| (25) | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-41655) filed with the SEC on May 3, 2024 and incorporated herein by reference. |
| (26) | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-41655) filed with the SEC on January 22, 2024 and incorporated herein by reference. |
| (27) | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-41655) filed with the SEC on September 11, 2024 and incorporated herein by reference. |
| (28) | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-41655) filed with the SEC on July 18, 2025 and incorporated herein by reference. |
| (29) | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 000-55710) filed with the SEC on September 6, 2022 and incorporated herein by reference. |
108
| (30) | Submitted Electronically Herewith. Attached as Exhibit 101 to this report are the following formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Consolidated Balance Sheets at June 30, 2025 and June 30, 2024, (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss for the years ended June 30, 2025 and 2024, (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended June 30, 2025 and 2024, (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity (Deficit) and Redeemable Noncontrolling Interest for the years ended June 30, 2025 and 2024, (v) the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. |
| ITEM 16. | FORM 10–K SUMMARY |
None.
109
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
| NIOCORP DEVELOPMENTS LTD. | ||
| By: | /s/ Neal Shah | |
Neal Shah Chief Financial Officer | ||
September 11, 2025
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities indicated on September 11, 2025.
| Signature | Title | ||
| /s/ Mark A. Smith | President, Chief Executive Officer (Principal | ||
| Mark A. Smith | Executive Officer and Authorized U.S. Representative) | ||
| and Chairman of the Board of Directors | |||
| /s/ Neal Shah | Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and | ||
| Neal Shah | Accounting Officer) | ||
/s/ David C. Beling |
Director | ||
| David C. Beling | |||
/s/ Anthony W. Fulton |
Director | ||
| Anthony W. Fulton | |||
| /s/ Nilsa Guerrero-Mahon | Director | ||
| Nilsa Guerrero-Mahon | |||
| /s/ Dean C. Kehler | Director | ||
| Dean C. Kehler | |||
| /s/ Michael G. Maselli | Director | ||
| Michael G. Maselli | |||
| /s/ Peter Oliver | Director | ||
| Peter Oliver | |||
110
FAQ
What does NioCorp (NB) say about its ability to continue as a going concern?
How will the proceeds from the July 2025 offering be used?
Does NioCorp have any revenue or production?
What financing sources does the company have available?
Are there issues with the company’s financial controls?
