[SCHEDULE 13G/A] NGL ENERGY PARTNERS LP SEC Filing
RM Trading of Florida LLC filed Amendment No. 1 to Schedule 13G on 4 Aug 2025 disclosing its current position in NGL Energy Partners LP (ticker: NGL). As of the event date 2 Jul 2025, the Florida-based entity, managed by Mark Paley, owns 4,306,135 common units with shared voting and dispositive power only. This equals 3.3 % of the outstanding units, down from a previously reportable level above 5 %. Item 5 confirms the holder now owns “5 percent or less” of the class.
The filing is made under Rule 13d-1(c) as a passive investment; the certification states the securities were not acquired to influence control. No subsidiaries or additional group members are identified. Ownership type is coded “OO” (other organization).
- Reporting person: RM Trading of Florida LLC
- Manager/signatory: Mark Paley
- Beneficial ownership: 4.31 m units; 0 sole / 4.31 m shared
- Percent of class: 3.3 %
Implication: A notable holder has reduced its stake below the 5 % threshold, signalling partial exit or dilution, but it remains a mid-sized shareholder. No operational or financial metrics for NGL are included in this filing.
- Transparent disclosure of current 3.3 % holding allows investors to gauge ownership changes.
- Passive certification confirms no activist intentions, reducing control-change risk.
- Stake reduction below 5 % implies selling pressure and reduced insider alignment.
- Loss of mandatory reporting once below 5 % decreases future visibility into this holder’s transactions.
Insights
TL;DR – Holder trims stake to 3.3 %; modestly negative signal but low overall impact.
Dropping below 5 % suggests RM Trading has sold roughly a third of its prior position or has been diluted. While a 4.3 m-unit sale can pressure liquidity in the near term, the ownership is still passive and no activist intent is expressed. Given NGL’s typical daily volume, the disposal is unlikely to be disruptive if executed over time. From a valuation standpoint, the filing does not change fundamentals; it merely removes an obligatory reporting requirement going forward. I view the impact on share price sentiment as mildly negative, yet not material to long-term valuation.
TL;DR – Governance neutral: passive investor exits reporting status, no control implications.
The amendment reiterates that the units are held without intent to influence control, aligning with Rule 13d-1(c). Reduction below 5 % eliminates mandatory Schedule 13D/G updates, decreasing future transparency on this holder. However, the stake was never large enough to materially affect governance decisions at NGL. No group formation, no board nomination, and no activist language means corporate control risk remains unchanged. Overall governance impact is neutral.