NVIDIA insider files Form 144 to sell 40,000 shares through UBS
Rhea-AI Filing Summary
Form 144 notice for NVDA shows a proposed sale of 40,000 shares of common stock through UBS Financial Services Inc with an aggregate market value of $7,105,600. The form lists the seller's acquired shares originated from equity compensation on specific dates: 03/15/2017 (33,400 shares), 03/20/2019 (100 shares), 11/15/2023 (3,250 shares) and 05/15/2024 (3,250 shares). The filing reports 24,300,000,000 shares outstanding and indicates no securities sold in the past three months by the reporting person. The notice includes the standard representation that the seller is not aware of undisclosed material adverse information.
Positive
- Proposed sale fully detailed including broker name (UBS) and aggregate market value ($7,105,600)
- Acquisition history disclosed showing securities were received as equity compensation on specific dates
- No reported sales in past three months, which simplifies Rule 144 aggregation considerations
Negative
- None.
Insights
TL;DR: Routine Rule 144 sale notice: identifiable broker, size and acquisition history disclosed, no recent sales reported.
The filing presents a standard Form 144 disclosure identifying the broker, the exact number of shares proposed for sale and the aggregate market value. It details the provenance of the securities as equity compensation across multiple grant dates, which supports compliance with Rule 144 transferability conditions. The absence of reported sales in the prior three months simplifies aggregation calculations under the rule. This filing is procedural and informational rather than a corporate operational event.
TL;DR: Administrative disclosure with no company-level governance changes or material new information about the issuer.
The document is limited to a proposed insider sale and does not disclose any corporate actions, executive departures, or financial results. It affirms the seller's representation about lack of undisclosed material adverse information, as required. From a governance perspective, this is a routine insider liquidity event that does not, by itself, signal a change in issuer governance or operations.