NVIDIA Form 144: Seawell trust plans new US$8M share sale
Rhea-AI Filing Summary
NVIDIA Corp. (NVDA) – Form 144 filing dated 30 June 2025
An affiliated insider, identified as the Rosemary & A Brooke Seawell Revocable Trust, has filed notice of intent to sell 50,912 common shares of NVIDIA through Rockefeller Capital Management on or after 30 June 2025. The proposed sale carries an aggregate market value of approximately US$8.0 million. These shares were originally acquired on 12 Aug 2004 via stock-option exercise.
The filing also discloses that during the preceding three months the same trust completed six open-market transactions, divesting a combined 320,639 shares for total gross proceeds of roughly US$48 million. All sales were executed on Nasdaq between 20 June and 27 June 2025.
Relative to NVIDIA’s reported 24.4 billion shares outstanding, the proposed sale represents about 0.0002 % of total shares and is therefore immaterial to capital structure. However, successive insider disposals can influence sentiment, especially amid NVIDIA’s elevated valuation.
- No reference is made to a Rule 10b5-1 trading plan, although the form provides a placeholder for such disclosure.
- The signer attests to possessing no undisclosed material adverse information, as required by Rule 144.
Key take-away: The notice signals continued insider profit-taking but is unlikely to affect NVIDIA’s liquidity, earnings, or operating outlook.
Positive
- None.
Negative
- Continued insider selling: Planned divestiture of 50,912 shares follows 320,639 shares sold in prior 3 months, potentially signaling profit-taking and dampening sentiment.
Insights
TL;DR: Insider plans to sell 50.9k NVDA shares (~US$8 M) after already unloading 320.6k; tiny dilution, sentiment mildly negative.
The Seawell trust’s planned disposition adds to a recent US$48 M liquidation, suggesting ongoing profit-taking by a long-time holder. Yet the absolute share count is insignificant versus NVIDIA’s multibillion float, leaving EPS, free-float, and liquidity unchanged. Historical data show insider activity has not been a reliable predictor of near-term NVDA price moves. I view the filing as non-material from a valuation perspective, though headline-sensitive investors may perceive modest bearish sentiment.
TL;DR: Repeated insider sales without clear 10b5-1 disclosure raise optics concerns but no governance red flags.
Director-linked trusts routinely use Rule 144 to monetize holdings. Absence of an explicit 10b5-1 plan reference means transactions could be discretionary, potentially heightening scrutiny if clustered around material news windows. Nonetheless, the signer’s certification satisfies Rule 144 and Section 16 obligations. From a governance lens, the filing is routine; risk arises only if sales coincide with undisclosed information, which the attestation denies.