UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 20-F
☐ REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) or (g) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
OR
☒ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025
OR
☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
OR
☐ SHELL COMPANY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Commission File Number 000-30668
NOVA LTD.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
|
Nova Ltd.
(Translation of Registrant’s name into English)
|
Israel
(Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
5 David Fikes St., Rehovot 7632805, Israel
(Address of principal executive offices)
Guy Kizner, +972-73-2295833, +972-8-9407776, Rehovot 7632805, Israel
(Name, Telephone, E-mail and/or Facsimile number and Address of the Registrant’s Contact Person)
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
Title of each class
|
Trading Symbol(s)
|
Name of each exchange on which registered
|
|
Ordinary Shares
|
NVMI
|
The Nasdaq Global Select Market
|
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act:
None
Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuer’s classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period covered by the annual report: 31,780,111 ordinary shares, as of December 31, 2025.
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
Yes ☒ No ☐
If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Yes ☐ No ☒
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or an emerging growth company. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer ☒ Accelerated filer ☐ Non-accelerated filer ☐
Emerging growth company ☐
If an emerging growth company that prepares its financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 7(a)(2)(B) of the Securities Act. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on the attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report.
Yes ☒ No ☐
If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive – based compensation received by any of the registrant’s executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D-1(b). ☐
Indicate by check mark which basis of accounting the registrant has used to prepare the financial statements included in this filing:
U.S. GAAP ☒
International Financing Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board ☐
Other ☐
If “Other” has been checked in response to the previous question, indicate by check mark which financial statement item the registrant has elected to follow:
Item 17 ☐ Item 18 ☐
If this is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes ☐ No ☒
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
Page |
|
PART I |
1 |
|
|
Item 1. Identity of Directors, Senior Management and Advisors
|
1 |
|
|
Item 2. Offer Statistics and Expected Timetable |
1 |
|
|
Item 3. Key Information |
1 |
|
|
3A. |
Selected Financial Data |
1 |
|
|
3B. |
Capitalization and Indebtedness |
1 |
|
|
3C. |
Reasons for the Offer and Use of Proceeds |
1 |
|
|
3D. |
Risk Factors |
1 |
|
|
Item 4. Information on the Company |
39 |
|
|
4.A |
History and Development of the Company |
39 |
|
|
4.B |
Business Overview |
40 |
|
|
4.C |
Organizational Structure |
53 |
|
|
4.D |
Property, Plant and Equipment |
53 |
|
|
Item 4A. Unresolved Staff Comments |
54 |
|
|
Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects |
54 |
|
|
5.A |
Operating Results |
60 |
|
|
5.B |
Liquidity and Capital Resources |
62 |
|
|
5.C |
Research and Development, Patents and Licenses, etc. |
63 |
|
|
5.D |
Trend Information |
66 |
|
|
5.E |
Critical Accounting Estimates |
66 |
|
|
Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees |
68 |
|
|
6.A |
Directors and Senior Management |
68 |
|
|
6.B |
Compensation |
73 |
|
|
6.C |
Board Practices |
77 |
|
|
6.D |
Employees |
85 |
|
|
6.E |
Share Ownership |
86 |
|
|
6.F |
Disclosure of Registrant’s Action to Recover Erroneously Awarded Compensation.
|
87 |
|
|
Item 7. Major Shareholder and Related Party Transactions |
88 |
|
|
7.A |
Major Shareholders |
88 |
|
|
7.B |
Related Party Transactions |
89 |
|
|
7.C |
Interest of Experts and Counsel |
90 |
|
|
Item 8. Financial Information |
91 |
|
|
8.A |
Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information |
91 |
|
|
8.B |
Significant Changes |
91 |
|
|
Item 9. The Offer and Listing |
92 |
|
|
9.A |
Offer and Listing Details |
92 |
|
|
9.B |
Plan of Distribution |
92 |
|
|
9.C |
Markets |
92 |
|
|
9.D |
Selling Shareholders |
92 |
|
|
9.E |
Dilution |
92 |
|
|
9.F |
Expenses of the Issue |
92 |
|
|
Item 10. Additional Information |
92 |
|
|
10.A |
Share Capital |
92 |
|
|
10.B |
Memorandum and Articles of Association |
92 |
|
|
10.C |
Material Contracts |
92 |
|
|
10.D |
Exchange Controls |
93 |
|
|
10.E |
Taxation |
93 |
|
|
10.F |
Dividends and Paying Agents |
112 |
|
|
10.G |
Statements by Experts |
112 |
|
|
10.H |
Documents on Display |
112 |
|
|
10.I |
Subsidiary Information |
112 |
|
|
10.J |
Annual Report to Security Holders |
112 |
|
|
Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
113 |
|
|
Impact of Currency Fluctuation |
113 |
|
|
Item 12. Description of Securities Other than Equity Securities
|
113 |
|
PART II |
114 |
|
|
Item 13. Defaults, Dividend Arrearages and Delinquencies |
114 |
|
|
Item 14. Material Modification to the Rights of Security Holders and
Use of Proceeds |
114 |
|
|
Item 15. Controls and Procedures |
114 |
|
|
Item 16 [Reserved] |
115 |
|
|
Item 16A. Audit Committee Financial Expert |
115 |
|
|
Item 16B. Code of Ethics |
115 |
|
|
Item 16C. Principal Accountant Fees and Services |
116 |
|
|
Item 16D. Exemptions from the Listing Standards for Audit Committees
|
116 |
|
|
Item 16E. Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated
Purchasers |
117 |
|
|
Item 16F. Change In Registrant’s Certifying Accountant
|
117 |
|
|
Item 16G. Corporate Governance |
117 |
|
|
Item 16H. Mine Safety Disclosure |
117 |
|
|
Item 16I. Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions that Prevent Inspections
|
117 |
|
|
Item 16J. Insider Trading Policies |
118 |
|
|
Item 16K. Cybersecurity |
118 |
|
PART III |
119 |
|
|
Item 17. Financial Statements |
119 |
|
|
Item 18. Financial Statements |
119 |
|
|
Item 19. Exhibits |
|
|
SIGNATURES |
121 |
INTRODUCTION
In this annual report (this “Annual
Report”), references to “we,” “us,” “our,” “our business,” “the Company,”
“Nova” and similar references refer to Nova Ltd. and, where appropriate, its consolidated subsidiaries.
This annual report contains estimates, projections
and other information concerning our industry and our business, as well as data regarding market research, estimates and forecasts prepared
by our management. Information that is based on estimates, forecasts, projections, market research or similar methodologies is inherently
subject to uncertainties, and actual events or circumstances may differ materially from events and circumstances that are assumed in this
information. The industry in which we operate is subject to a high degree of uncertainty and risk due to a variety of factors, including
those discussed under the headings “Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” and Item 3.D. “Risk Factors”
in this Annual Report.
FORWARD – LOOKING STATEMENTS AND RISK FACTORS SUMMARY
This Annual Report contains estimates and forward-looking
statements, principally in the sections entitled Item 3.D. “Key Information—Risk Factors,” Item 4. “Information
on the Company,” and Item 5. “Operating and Financial Review and Prospects.” In some cases, these forward-looking statements
can be identified by words or phrases such as “may,” “might,” “will,” “could,” “would,”
“should,” “expect,” “plan,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “seek,” “believe,”
“estimate,” “predict,” “potential,” “continue,” “contemplate,” “possible”
or similar words. Statements regarding our future results of operations and financial position, growth strategy and plans and objectives
of management for future operations, including, among others, expansion in new and existing markets, are forward-looking statements.
Our estimates and forward-looking statements are
mainly based on our current expectations and estimates of future events and trends which affect or may affect our business, operations
and industry. Although we believe that these estimates and forward-looking statements are based upon reasonable assumptions, they are
subject to numerous risks and uncertainties.
These forward-looking statements are subject to
a number of known and unknown risks, uncertainties, other factors and assumptions, including the risks described in Item 3.D “Key
Information—Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this Annual Report.
The below important factors and uncertainties,
among others, could cause actual results to differ materially from those described in these forward-looking statements. The below is also
a summary of the risk factors described in Item 3.D “Key Information – Risk Factors” of this Annual Report.
Risks
Related to Economic and External Risks
|
• |
Increased cybersecurity threats and more sophisticated computer crime
could disrupt our business. |
|
• |
We depend on international sales, which expose us to foreign political
and economic risks. |
|
• |
We are subject to laws and regulations that could restrict our operations
such as economic sanctions and export restrictions. |
|
• |
Changes in global trade policies and other factors beyond our control
may adversely impact our business, financial condition and results of operations. |
|
• |
Changes in the U.S. taxation of international business activities
or the adoption of other tax reform policies could materially impact our business, results or operations and financial condition.
|
|
• |
We may be affected by instability in the global economy and by financial
turmoil. |
|
• |
Because we derive a significant portion of our revenues from sales
in Asia, our sales could be hurt by instability of Asian economies. |
|
• |
Our business is subject to risks related with doing business in China.
|
Risks
Related to Technology and Intellectual Property
|
• |
Because of the technical nature of our business, our intellectual
property is extremely important to our business, and our inability to protect our intellectual property could harm our competitive position.
|
|
• |
There has been litigation involving intellectual property rights
in the semiconductor and related industries, and similar litigation could force us to divert resources to defend against such litigation
or deter our customers from purchasing our systems. |
|
• |
We may incorporate open-source technology in some of our software
and product, which may expose us to liability and have a material impact on our product development and sales. |
|
• |
We may use artificial intelligence (“AI”) technologies
which may expose us to liability and have a material impact on our product development. |
Risks
Related to our Industry
|
• |
We operate in an extremely competitive market, and if we fail to
compete effectively, our revenues and market share will decline. |
|
• |
If we do not respond effectively and on a timely basis to rapid technological
changes, our ability to attract and retain customers could be diminished, which would have an adverse effect on our sales and ability
to remain competitive. |
|
• |
The ongoing consolidation in our industry may harm us if our competitors
are able to offer a broader range of products and greater customer support than we can offer or if our main suppliers cease delivery of
important component as a result of being acquired by a larger company. |
|
• |
The markets we target are cyclical and it is difficult to predict
the length and strength of any downturn or expansion period. |
|
• |
Our operations may be delayed or interrupted and our business could
suffer if we violate environmental, safety and health, or ESH, regulations. |
Risks
Related to our Operations
|
• |
We recently implemented a new ERP system, and challenges relating
to the implementation and operation of our new system could negatively impact our business and operations. |
|
• |
Pricing and demand for our specific product lines could substantially
reduce our sales. |
|
• |
We depend on a small number of large customers, and the loss of one
or more of them could significantly lower our revenues. |
|
• |
Our inability to significantly reduce spending during a protracted
slowdown in the semiconductor industry could reduce our prospects of achieving continued profitability. |
|
• |
There can be no assurance that revenues from future products or product
enhancements will be sufficient to recover the development costs. |
|
• |
New product lines that we may introduce in the future may contain
defects, which will require us to allocate time and financial resources to correct. |
|
• |
If any of our systems fail to meet or exceed our internal quality
specifications, we cannot ship them until such time as they have met such specifications. |
|
• |
Our dependence on a single manufacturing facility per product line
magnifies the risk of an interruption in our production capabilities. |
|
• |
Our lease agreements for our Manufacturing Facilities include provisions
that exempt the landlord and others from liability for damages to our Manufacturing Facilities. |
|
• |
Shipment changes or cancellation may render our backlog not a reliable
indicator of actual sales and financial results. |
|
• |
We may not be able to successfully complete and integrate current
and/or future acquisitions. |
|
• |
We depend on continuous cooperation with Process Equipment Manufacturers
(“PEMs”) to enable sales of our systems which are integrated with the process equipment. |
|
• |
Some of our commercial agreements with PEMs and customers may include
exclusivity provisions and limitations on the use of certain intellectual property which could limit or prevent future business relationships
with third parties. |
|
• |
We depend on a limited number of suppliers, and in some cases a sole
supplier. |
|
• |
The disclosure rules regarding the use of conflict minerals may affect
our relationships with suppliers and customers. |
|
• |
Our lengthy sales cycle increases our exposure to customer delays
in orders, which may result in obsolete inventory and volatile quarterly revenues. |
|
• |
Our inability to attract, recruit, retain highly skilled key personnel.
|
Risks
Related to Our Incorporation and Location in Israel
|
• |
Conditions in Israel, including Israel’s conflicts with
certain parties in the region, as well as political and economic instability, may adversely affect our business, our results of operations
and our ability to raise additional funds. |
Risks
Related to Our Indebtedness and Capital Structure
|
• |
Our convertible senior notes due 2030 may impact our financial results,
dilute existing shareholders, create downward pressure on the price of our ordinary shares, and restrict our ability to take advantage
of future opportunities. |
| |
|
|
• |
Our capped call transactions may affect the value of our debt and
ordinary shares. |
Risks
Related to Financial, Legal, Regulatory and Taxation Risks
|
• |
Currency fluctuations could harm our profit margins. |
|
• |
We received certain research and development grants, which could
impose restrictions on our ability to use technology developed under these programs. |
|
• |
Certain shareholders may control the outcome of matters submitted
to a vote of our shareholders, including the election of directors. |
|
• |
The market price of our ordinary shares may be affected by a limited
trading volume and may fluctuate significantly. |
|
• |
We may be classified as a “passive foreign investment company”
for U.S. income tax purposes, which could have significant and adverse tax consequences to U.S. shareholders. |
|
• |
The rights and responsibilities of our shareholders are governed
by Israeli law and differ in some respects from the rights and responsibilities of shareholders under U.S. law. |
|
• |
Our shares are listed for trade on more than one stock exchange. |
|
• |
As a foreign private issuer, we are subject to reporting and corporate governance requirements that differ
from those applicable to U.S. domestic companies, and the loss of this status could result in significant additional costs and expenses.
|
You should not rely on forward-looking statements
as predictions of future events. We have based the forward-looking statements contained in this Annual Report primarily on our current
expectations and projections about future events and trends that we believe may affect our business, financial condition and operating
results. The outcome of the events described in these forward-looking statements is subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors
described in the section titled “Risk factors” and elsewhere in this Annual Report. Moreover, we operate in a very competitive
and rapidly changing environment. New risks and uncertainties emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for us to predict all risks
and uncertainties that could have an impact on the forward-looking statements contained in this Annual Report. The results, events and
circumstances reflected in the forward-looking statements may not be achieved or occur, and actual results, events or circumstances could
differ materially from those described in the forward-looking statements.
In addition, statements that “we believe”
and similar statements reflect our beliefs and opinions on the relevant subject. These statements are based on information available to
us as of the date of this Annual Report. While we believe that information provides a reasonable basis for these statements, that information
may be limited or incomplete. Our statements should not be read to indicate that we have conducted an exhaustive inquiry into, or review
of, all relevant information. These statements are inherently uncertain, and investors are cautioned not to unduly rely on these statements.
The forward-looking statements made in this Annual
Report relate only to events as of the date on which the statements are made. We undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking
statements made in this Annual Report to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this Annual Report or to reflect new information
or the occurrence of unanticipated events, except as required by law. We may not actually achieve the plans, intentions or expectations
disclosed in our forward-looking statements, and you should not place undue reliance on our forward-looking statements. Our forward-looking
statements do not reflect the potential impact of any future acquisitions, mergers, dispositions, joint ventures or investments.
OUR FUNCTIONAL CURRENCY
Unless otherwise indicated, all amounts herein
are expressed in United States dollars (“U.S. dollars”, “dollars”, “USD”, “US$” or “$”).
The currency of the primary economic environment
in which we operate is the U.S. dollar, since substantially all our revenues to date have been denominated in U.S. dollars and over 50%
of our expenses are in U.S. dollars or in New Israeli Shekels linked to the dollar. Transactions and balances denominated in dollars are
presented at their original amounts. Non-dollar transactions and balances have been re-measured into dollars as required by the principles
in ASC 830 Foreign Currency Matters. All exchange gains and losses from such re-measurement are included in the net financial income when
they arise.
PART I
Item 1. Identity
of Directors, Senior Management and Advisors
Not applicable.
Item 2. Offer
Statistics and Expected Timetable
Not applicable.
Item 3. Key
Information
3A.
Selected Financial Data
[Reserved]
3B.
Capitalization and Indebtedness
Not applicable.
3C.
Reasons for the Offer and Use of Proceeds
Not applicable.
3D.
Risk Factors
You should carefully consider the risks described
below before making an investment decision. Additional risks not presently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial may also
impair our business operations. Our business, financial condition or results of operations could be materially and adversely affected
by any of these risks. The trading price and value of our ordinary shares could decline due to any of these risks, and you may lose
all or part of your investment. This Annual Report also contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties.
Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of certain factors,
including the risks faced by us described below and elsewhere in this Annual Report.
Economic and External Risks
Increased information technology security threats
and more sophisticated computer crime could disrupt our business.
Our global
operations are linked by information systems, including telecommunications, the internet, our corporate intranet, network communications,
email and various computer hardware and software applications. In light of information technology security threats, we have implemented
network security measures and engaged the services of cybersecurity experts to implement security policies and tools which were reviewed
and discussed by our audit committee and board of directors. In the current environment, there are numerous and evolving risks with regards
to cybersecurity and privacy, including criminal hackers, hacktivists, state-sponsored intrusions, industrial espionage, employee malfeasance
and human or technological error. High-profile security breaches at other companies and in government agencies have increased in recent
years, and security industry experts and government officials have warned about the risks of hackers and cyberattacks targeting businesses
such as ours. Computer hackers and others routinely attempt to breach the security of technology products, services and systems, and to
fraudulently induce employees, customers, sub-contractors, agents, distributors or others to disclose information or unwittingly provide
access to systems or data. In addition, some of our software and products utilize open-source technologies, which may also be used by
computer hackers for the purpose of cyber-attacks. Since the beginning of the recent hostilities in Israel that began in October 2023,
Israeli and Israeli associated companies have become more frequently the target of cyberattacks. As such, the risk of a cyberattack against
our information technology systems and data security may become heightened. Furthermore, the increasingly growing capabilities of AI and
its availability to public use and adopted, may be used to identify vulnerabilities in our systems craft sophisticated cyberattacks.
Although we have invested in measures to reduce
these risks, such as creating a cybersecurity risk management program and putting in place a cybersecurity incident response plan which
includes an incident response plan, we can provide no assurance that our current IT systems are fully protected against third-party intrusions,
viruses, hacker attacks, information or data theft or other similar threats. The cost and operational consequences of implementing, maintaining,
and enhancing further data or system protection measures could increase significantly to overcome increasingly intense, complex, and sophisticated
global cyber threats. Despite our best efforts, we are not fully insulated from data breaches and system disruptions and, accordingly,
we have experienced and expect to continue to experience actual or attempted cyberattacks of our IT networks. Although none of these actual
or attempted cyberattacks have had a material adverse effect on our operations or financial condition thus far, we cannot guarantee that
any such incidents will not have a material adverse effect on our operations or financial condition in the future. Any material breaches
of cybersecurity or media reports of perceived security vulnerabilities to our systems or those of the Company’s third parties,
even if no breach has been attempted or occurred, could cause us to experience reputational harm, loss of data, loss of customers and
revenue, regulatory actions and scrutiny, sanctions or other statutory penalties, litigation, liability for failure to safeguard our customers’
information, or financial losses that are either not insured against or not fully covered through any insurance maintained by us. Any
of the foregoing may have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.
As
such, our tools and servers may be vulnerable to computer viruses, break-ins and similar disruptions from unauthorized tampering with
our computer systems and tools located at our facility, at cloud services or at customer sites, or could be subject to system failures
or malfunctions for other reasons. Increased information technology security threats and more sophisticated computer crime pose a risk
to the security of our systems and networks and the confidentiality, availability and integrity of our data or customer data or suppliers’
data. Cybersecurity attacks could also include attacks targeting the security, integrity and/or reliability of the hardware and software
installed in our products. System failures or malfunctioning could disrupt our operations and our ability to timely and accurately process
and report key components of our financial results.
We are dependent on international sales, which
expose us to foreign political and economic risks that could impede our revenue stream.
Our principal customers are located in Taiwan,
Japan, South Korea, China and the United States, and we produce our products in Israel, the United States and Germany. International operations
expose us to a variety of risks that could seriously impact our financial condition and impede our revenue stream including:
| |
• |
instability in political or economic conditions, including but
not limited to inflation, recession, foreign currency exchange restrictions and devaluations, restrictive governmental controls on the
movement and repatriation of earnings and capital, and actual or anticipated military or political conflicts, particularly in emerging
markets, including but not limited to, rising inflation and elevated U.S. budget deficits and overall debt levels, can put upward pressure
on interest rates and could be among the factors that could lead to higher interest rates in the future. Higher interest rates could adversely
affect our overall business or reduce our liquidity. |
| |
• |
intergovernmental conflicts or actions, including but not limited
to armed conflict, trade wars and acts of terrorism or war, including the current war between Russia and the Ukraine, as well as the growing
tensions between Taiwan and China and the Chinese actions in the South China Sea. |
| |
• |
In October 2025, a ceasefire agreement was reached between Israel and Hamas, resulting in a cessation of
active hostilities between these parties. However, the situation remains volatile, and there is still a risk of renewed escalation or
spillover involving other parties in the region. As a result, we could experience disruptions in our business or business of our partners,
customers, or the economy as a whole, any of which could adversely affect and could materially adversely impact our business, results
of operations, and overall financial condition in future periods. |
| |
• |
interruptions to the Company’s business with its largest customers, distributors and suppliers resulting
from but not limited to, strikes, shortage in raw materials and subcomponents due to geopolitical situation and financial instability.
For instance, trade restrictions, changes in tariffs and import and export license requirements could adversely affect our ability to
sell our products in the countries adopting or changing those restrictions, tariffs or requirements. This could reduce our sales by a
material amount. |
All of these risks could result in increased costs
or decreased revenues, either of which could have a materially adverse effect on our profitability.
We are subject to laws and regulations that could
restrict our operations, including economic sanctions and export restrictions.
Our business is subject to certain laws and restrictions
based on the items we export and countries with which we conduct business.
Specifically, starting 2018 and to date, the U.S.
Department of Commerce, Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) has taken actions to restrict exports to several Chinese-based semiconductor
manufacturers by adding them to the U.S. Export Administration Regulations’ (EAR) Entity List. These manufacturers have acquired
and continue to acquire several of our metrology solutions. Due to the abovementioned export restrictions, our U.S. subsidiary is currently
restricted from shipping tools or parts, or to provide any form of service to such customers, until it is granted an appropriate license
by BIS.
In addition, in 2020 the U.S. Department of Commerce
introduced restrictions on exporting certain foreign-made items to Huawei and to customers who are suppliers to Huawei, which is a Chinese
based electronics supplier.
In October 2022, the U.S. Department of Commerce
introduced additional restrictions that have limited the ability of our U.S. subsidiary to serve a small portion of the available Chinese
market. As part of these restrictions, in addition to the Entity List additions, the U.S. Department of Commerce has also restricted shipment
of products used for certain advanced technology nodes, including products that use artificial intelligence and advanced computing products.
Consequently, our U.S. subsidiary is required to obtain a license in order to ship to certain Chinese entities which are known to have
or are known to plan to have, certain advanced-nodes manufacturing or development abilities (as those are defined in the EAR). These restrictions
also apply to shipments of high-power advanced chips to China (as those are defined in the regulations), by any entity. These new restrictions
also impose personal liability on any “U.S. Person” who has “knowledge” that any item shipped, transmitted
or transferred will be used for certain advanced nodes and/or high-powered chips development or production, and who provides support for
such transactions.
In October 2023, the U.S. Department of Commerce
issued two additional rules further restricting China’s ability to obtain advanced computing chips, develop and maintain supercomputers,
and manufacture advanced semiconductors, and added several new Chinese entities to the Entity List. In November 2023, the U.S. Department
of Commerce also partially suspended some of the licenses granted by it concerning certain Chinese customers as recipients.
In September 2024, the U.S. Department of Commerce
issued an interim final rule further restricting certain end uses for semiconductor capital equipment. This interim final rule targets
advanced technologies such as GAAFET (Gate-All-Around field effect transistor), advanced semiconductor manufacturing equipment and Quantum
computers controls, which includes hardware, software, and related components. Pursuant to this, exporters will need to obtain licenses
for the export outside of the US, reexport, or transfer (in-country) of certain items, all subject to the terms of the general license
issues together with the interim final rule.
In December 2024, BIS issued a package of rules
designed to further impair China’s capability to produce advanced-node semiconductors with ‘military applications’,
that can be used in the next generation of advanced weapon systems and in artificial intelligence (AI) and advanced computing. Such regulatory
measures include, but are not limited to, new controls on semiconductor manufacturing equipment, new controls on software tools, new controls
on high-bandwidth memory (HBM), and additions of 140 entities to the Entity List. The regulatory update also includes the establishment
of two new Foreign Direct Product (FDP) rules and corresponding de minimis provisions, new software and technology controls, and a clarification
to the EAR regarding existing controls on software keys.
In September 2025, BIS issued the "Affiliates
Rule," which expands end-user export controls to any foreign entity owned 50% or more, directly or indirectly, by one or more persons
on the BIS Entity List or Military End User (MEU) List, as well as certain parties on the Specially Designated Nationals (SDN) List. However,
this rule has been suspended for one year, effective November 10, 2025. The suspension is set to terminate on November 9, 2026.
In some cases, the abovementioned export restrictions
might also be applicable to the items exported from countries other than the U.S., either by international arrangements made between countries,
as updated from time to time, imposing export limitation and supervisory duties, or by limitations on the re-export of certain U.S. origin
items.
Since the introduction of each of these restrictions,
we have put in place processes to ensure compliance with applicable restrictions. While we continue to conduct detailed assessments of
the new restrictions and monitor new sanctions and restrictions that could arise, any potential violations of such regulations, whether
under U.S. or other jurisdictions, could have an adverse impact on our reputation, business, results of operations and financials.
New export control regulations have also been
introduced in other jurisdictions, including certain European countries, including Germany and the Netherlands which are adopting or expected
to adopt comparative controls to the U.S. EAR; China on items related to gallium and germanium, though the export ban is currently suspended
until November 27, 2026; and Japan on advanced semiconductor-manufacturing equipment.
While certain export regulations issued in some
jurisdictions currently do not have a direct major effect on us, these may have an adverse effect on our supply chain, as well as the
semiconductor manufacturing sector in China by reducing the demand for metrology equipment from this sector and therefore indirectly affect
our sales. In addition, our growing presence in Europe, through recent acquisitions, may increase our exposure to changes in the European
export control regulations and updates to the Wassenaar List of Dual-Use Goods.
We are also subject to the Israeli export control
regime, which mainly governs defense exports and export of dual-use items. Dual-use items are defined under the Israeli export control
regime in accordance with the Wassenaar List of Dual-Use Goods and Technologies (the Wassenaar Control List), which is adopted into the
Israeli law. Our products are not currently subject to control under Israeli law. However, the Wassenaar Control List is updated annually,
and any changes in the classification of the components, materials, software or technology used in our products could impact exports from
Israel, potentially leading to licensing requirements which may delay our export operations, create additional costs related to handling
the licensing requests, and potentially limit our market, as sales and export of controlled items would be subject to the regulator's
discretion.
Changes in global trade policies and other factors
beyond our control may adversely impact our business, financial condition and results of operations.
The international environment in which we operate
is affected by inter-country trade agreements and tariffs. As a result of recent revisions in the U.S. administrative policy there are,
and may be additional, changes to existing trade agreements, greater restrictions on free trade and significant increases in tariffs on
goods imported into the United States. Therefore, there is current uncertainty about the future relationship between the United States
and other countries with respect to trade policies, taxes, government regulations, and tariffs, and we cannot predict whether, and to
what extent, U.S. trade policies will change in the future, including as a result of changes by the current U.S. presidential administration.
In 2025, the global tariff landscape began to quickly change following the U.S. government announcing new or increased tariffs on various
countries. While we continue to monitor the situation as it evolves, these additional tariffs or any future tariffs or retaliation by
another government against such tariffs or policies have introduced significant uncertainty into the market. Future actions of the U.S.
administration and that of foreign governments, including China, with respect to tariffs or international trade agreements and policies,
remain currently unclear.
The escalation of a trade war, tariffs, retaliatory
tariffs or other trade restrictions on products and materials either exported by us to China or raw materials imported by us from China
may significantly impede our ability to provide our solutions and service our customers in China or other effected locations. Such developments
may result in a decrease in demand for our products and technologies as well as delays in payments from our customers. Furthermore, other
governmental action related to tariffs or international trade agreements, changes in U.S. social, political, regulatory and economic conditions
or in laws and policies governing foreign trade, manufacturing, development and investment in the territories and countries, where our
customers are located, could adversely affect our business, financial condition, operating results and cash flows.
We may be affected by instability in the global
economy and by financial turmoil.
There is an inherent risk, based on the complex
relationships among China, Japan, Korea, Taiwan, and the United States, that political, diplomatic and national security influences might
lead to trade disputes, impacts and/or disruptions, in particular those affecting the semiconductor industry. This would adversely affect
our business with China, Japan, Korea, and/or Taiwan and perhaps the entire Asia Pacific region or global economy. A significant trade
dispute, impact and/or disruption in any area where we do business could have a materially adverse impact on our future revenue and profits.
Instability in the global markets and in the geopolitical environment in many parts of the world, including current war between Russia
and the Ukraine, as well as other disruptions may continue to put pressure on global economic conditions. In the event global economic
and market conditions, or economic conditions in key markets, remain uncertain or deteriorate further, we may experience material impacts
on our business, operating results, and financial condition.
The Russia – Ukraine conflict could affect
our business.
The ongoing war between Russia and Ukraine has
impacted not only the global economy but the global energy markets as well, in particular the European energy market. This could result
in increased operating expenses in Germany, in the expense of shipping materials to and from our various facilities, and wellbeing of
our employees with respect to the energy crisis in Europe and the inability to heat buildings etc. Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine,
the cost for liquefied natural gas has more than doubled, this could lead to further energy price increase, causing global market disruption
and volatilities in supply chain. The high volatility of energy prices could have an indirect effect on our operations in Germany, and
our business expansion in other regions, which may adversely affect our financial condition and operating results.
Current market conditions, including inflation
and recessionary pressures could affect our growth and profitability.
The inflation, slower growth, changes to fiscal
and monetary policy, tighter credit, higher interest rates, high unemployment, geopolitical issues increase in energy costs, unstable
global conditions and changes in currency exchange rates continue to contribute to global economic instability. Furthermore, although
certain central banks, including the U.S. Federal Reserve, have adjusted policy rates in recent periods, such rates remain subject to
ongoing market and policy-driven fluctuations and could rise again in the future. These conditions, and their impact on the global macro-economic
environment, can impact our business, operating results and financial condition.
Because we derive a significant
portion of our revenues from sales in Asia, our sales could be hurt by instability of Asian economies.
A
number of Asian countries have experienced political and economic instability. For instance, the growing tension between Taiwan and China,
who have had a number of disputes, as have North and South Korea, and Japan has for a number of years experienced significant economic
instability. Additionally, the Asia-Pacific region is susceptible to the occurrence of natural disasters, such as earthquakes, cyclones,
tsunamis and flooding. We have subsidiaries in Taiwan, South Korea, China, Japan and Singapore and we have significant customers in Taiwan,
South Korea and China. An outbreak of hostilities or other political upheaval, economic downturns or the occurrence of a natural disaster
in these or other Asian countries would likely harm the operations of our customers in these countries, causing our sales to suffer.
Our business is subject to the risks associated
with operating in China.
Our results of operations, financial conditions,
and prospects are subject to a significant degree to economic, political and legal developments in China including government control
over capital investments or changes in tax regulations that are applicable to us. China’s economy differs from the economies of
most developed countries in many respects, including with respect to the amount of government involvement, level of development, growth
rate and control of foreign exchange, and allocation of resources. As one of our subsidiaries is located in China, our business is subject
to the risks associated with doing business in China, including:
| |
• |
trade protection measures, such as tariff increases, and import and
export licensing and control requirements; |
| |
• |
potentially negative consequences from changes in tax laws;
|
| |
• |
difficulties associated with the Chinese legal system, including
increased costs and uncertainties associated with enforcing contractual obligations in China; |
| |
• |
historically, lower protection of intellectual property rights;
|
| |
• |
changes and volatility in currency exchange rates; |
| |
• |
unexpected or unfavorable changes in regulatory requirements; and
|
| |
• |
local preference of emerging local competitors in China. |
Our business could be disrupted by catastrophic
events.
The occurrence of unforeseen or catastrophic events
such as terrorist attacks, extreme terrestrial or solar weather events or other natural disasters, emergence of a pandemic, or other widespread
health emergencies (or concerns over the possibility of such an emergency), could create economic and financial disruptions, and could
lead to operational difficulties that could impair our ability to manage our business.
Risks related to technology
and intellectual property
Because of the technical nature of our business,
our intellectual property is extremely important to our business, and our inability to protect our intellectual property could harm our
competitive position.
Our continued success depends upon our ability
to protect our core technology and intellectual property. We therefore have an extensive program devoting resources to seeking patent
protection for our inventions and discoveries that we believe will provide us with competitive advantages. Our patents, utility models
and patent applications principally cover various aspects of optical measurement systems and methods, integrated process control implementation
concepts, and optical, opto-mechanical and mechanical design. In addition, our patents and applications cover various aspects of X-ray
based measurement systems and methods, including process control implementation concepts, X-ray energy sources, electron optics and detection,
vacuum systems and equipment integration. Additionally, our chemical metrology equipment requires coverage of various elements and sub-systems
performing various types of chemical analysis of the process chemicals and semiconductor wet process control – including electrodeposition,
wet etch and clean and CMP sectors.
We cannot assure that:
| |
• |
pending patent applications will be approved; or |
| |
• |
any patents will be broad enough to protect our technology, will
provide us with competitive advantages or will not be challenged or invalidated by third parties. We also cannot assure that others will
not independently develop similar products, duplicate our products or, if patents are issued to us, design around these patents. Furthermore,
because patents may afford less protection under foreign law than is available under U.S. law, we cannot assure that any foreign patents
issued to us will adequately protect our proprietary rights. |
In
addition, a number of patents which relate to our main-stream products have already expired or are expected to expire in the coming years.
Such expiration may add significant competition to our tools in this area, which may lead to a decrease in our incomes. In addition, not
all our patents provide coverage in all territories we operate in, and thus in some territories there is less coverage on some product
lines.
In
addition to patent protection, we also rely upon trade secret protection, employee and third-party nondisclosure agreements and other
intellectual property protection methods to protect our confidential and proprietary information. Despite these efforts, we cannot be
certain that others will not otherwise gain access to our trade secrets or disclose our technology.
Additionally, as part of our long-term technological
collaboration, we are engaged in joint development activities with some of our strategic customers and vendors as well as with research
institutes. These activities impose some limitations on the joint intellectual property developed as part of these programs.
Furthermore,
we may be required to institute legal proceedings to protect our intellectual property. If such legal proceedings are resolved adversely
to us, our competitive position and/or results of operations could be harmed. For additional information on our intellectual property,
see “Item 4B. Business Overview — Intellectual Property” in this Annual Report.
There has been significant litigation
involving intellectual property rights in the semiconductor and related industries, and similar litigation involving our Company could
force us to divert resources to defend against such litigation or deter our customers from purchasing our systems.
We
have been, and may in the future be, notified of allegations that we may be infringing intellectual property rights possessed by others.
In addition, we may be required to commence legal proceedings against third parties, which may be infringing our intellectual property,
in order to defend our intellectual property. In the future, protracted litigation and expense may be incurred to defend ourselves against
alleged infringement of third-party rights or to defend our intellectual property against infringement by third parties. Adverse determinations
in that type of litigation could:
| |
• |
result in our loss of proprietary rights; |
| |
• |
subject us to significant liabilities, including triple damages in
some instances; |
| |
• |
require us to seek licenses from third parties, which licenses may
not be available on reasonable terms or at all; or |
| |
• |
prevent us from selling our products. |
Any litigation of this type, even if we are ultimately
successful, could result in substantial cost and diversion of time and effort by our management, which by itself could have a negative
impact on our profit margin, available funds, competitive position and ability to develop and market new and existing products. For additional
information on our intellectual property, see “Item 4B. Business Overview — Intellectual Property” in this Annual Report.
We may incorporate open-source technology in some
of our software and products, which may expose us to liability and have a material impact on our product development and sales.
In order to leverage big data and distributed
computing, some of our software and products utilize open-source technologies. These technologies may be subject to certain open-source
licenses, including but not limited to the General Public License, which, when used or integrated in particular manners, impose certain
requirements on the subsequent use of such technologies, and although scanned and reviewed may pose a potential risk to proprietary nature
of products. In the event that we have or will in the future, use or integrate software that is subject to such open source licenses into
or in connection with our products in such ways that will trigger certain requirements of these open source licenses, we may (i) be required
to include certain notices and abide by other requirements in the absence of which we may be found in breach of the copyrights owned by
the creators of such open source technologies; and/or (ii) be required to disclose our own source code or parts thereof to the public,
which could enable our competitors to eliminate some or any technological advantage that our products may have over theirs. Any such requirement
to disclose our source code or other confidential information related to our products, and the failure to abide by license requirement
resulting in copyright infringement, could materially adversely affect our competitive position and impact our business results of operations
and financial condition.
We may use AI technologies which may expose us
to liability and have a material impact on our product development.
Artificial intelligence (AI) is driving more semiconductor
businesses, specifically those in process control. Utilizing AI as part of process control is changing and will change the nature of the
solutions and may change the balance between hardware capabilities and software or algorithms needs. AI is a rapidly evolving technology
which requires further review and analysis to ensure that any line of code we generate by using these tools is accurate, complies with
quality standards, does not infringe any legal or commercial terms, and is secured code. Furthermore, our competitors may be more successful
in integrating AI technology into their products. While AI is creating efficiency in some aspects of our development, such as software
coding and customer support, there can be no assurance AI will enhance our business operations. While we scan and review these technologies
prior to use, when using third party AI technologies, that generate packages and lines of code, certain risks may arise, including, among
others: (i) uncertainty regarding the accuracy and quality of the code and the potential generation of inaccurate, misleading, discriminatory,
or unexpected content; (ii) enforcement of legal and commercial terms; (iii) security of the code potentially exposing us to cybersecurity
risks such as defects, viruses, ransomware or malware; and (iv) potential claims of copyright infringement or other intellectual property
misappropriation through the use of third-party AI tools in our products and services.
Risks related to our industry
We operate in an extremely
competitive market, and if we fail to compete effectively, our revenues and market share will decline.
Although the market for process control systems
used in semiconductor manufacturing is currently concentrated and characterized by relatively few participants, the semiconductor capital
equipment industry is intensely competitive. We compete mainly with Onto Innovation Inc., and KLA Corp., which manufacture and sell CD,
thin films and chemical metrology and process control systems. In addition, we compete with process equipment manufacturers, such as ASML
Holdings N.V., LAM Research, and Applied Materials Inc., which develop (or may acquire companies which develop) in-situ sensors and metrology
products. Established companies, both domestic and foreign, compete with our product lines, and new competitors enter our market from
time to time, including the recent emergence of local competitors in China. The recent acquisition of Sentronics and the expansion of
our portfolio in the wafer level packaging and specialty markets, positions us in direct competition with companies such as Merck and
Camtek. Some of our competitors have greater financial, engineering, manufacturing and marketing resources than we do. If a particular
customer selects a competitor’s capital equipment, we expect to experience difficulty in selling our solution to that customer for
a significant period of time. A substantial investment is required by the customers to evaluate, test, select and integrate capital equipment
into a production line. As a result, once a manufacturer has selected a particular vendor’s capital equipment, we believe that the
manufacturer generally relies upon that equipment for the specific production line application and frequently will attempt to consolidate
its other capital equipment requirements with the same vendor. Accordingly, unless our systems offer performance or cost advantages that
outweigh a customer’s expense of switching to our systems, it will be difficult for us to achieve significant sales from that customer
once it has selected another vendor’s system for an application. We believe that our ability to compete successfully depends on
a number of factors both within and outside of our control, including:
| |
• |
the contribution and value our solutions bring to our customers;
|
| |
• |
our product innovation, quality and performance; |
| |
• |
our global technical service and support; |
| |
• |
the return on investment (ROI) of our equipment and its cost of ownership;
|
| |
• |
the breadth of our product line; |
| |
• |
our success in developing and marketing new products; and |
| |
• |
the extendibility of our products. |
If we fail to compete in a timely and cost-effective
manner against current or future competitors, our revenues and market share will decline.
If we do not respond effectively and on a timely
basis to rapid technological changes, our ability to attract and retain customers could be diminished, which would have an adverse effect
on our sales and ability to remain competitive.
The
semiconductor manufacturing industry is characterized by rapid technological changes, new product introductions and enhancements and evolving
industry standards. Our ability to remain competitive and generate revenue will depend in part upon our ability to develop new and enhanced
systems at competitive prices in a timely and cost-effective manner and to accurately predict technological transitions. Because new product
development commitments must be made well in advance of sales, new product decisions must anticipate the future demand for products. If
we fail to correctly anticipate future demand for products, our sales and competitive position will deteriorate. In addition, the development
of new technologies, new product introductions or enhancements by our competitors could cause a decline in our sales or loss of market
acceptance of our existing products.
The ongoing consolidation in our industry may
harm us if our competitors are able to offer a broader range of products and greater customer support than we can offer or if our main
suppliers cease delivery of important component as a result of being acquired by a larger company.
We believe that the semiconductor capital
equipment market has undergone consolidation over the last few years. For example, ASML Holdings N.V. acquired Berliner Glas Group in
2020; KLA Corporation acquired ECI Technology in 2022; Nanometrics Inc. and Rudolph Technologies, Inc. merged in 2019 to create Onto Innovation
Inc., which also recently acquired part of SemiLab Ltd. We believe that similar acquisitions and business combinations involving our competitors,
our customers, and our suppliers and the PEMs may occur in the future. These acquisitions could adversely impact our competitive position
by enabling our current and potential competitors to expand their product offerings and customer services, which could provide them an
advantage in meeting customers’ needs, particularly with those customers that seek to consolidate their capital equipment requirements
with a smaller number of vendors. The greater resources, including financial, marketing, intellectual property and support resources,
of competitors involved in these acquisitions could allow them to accelerate the development and commercialization of new competitive
products and the marketing of existing competitive products to their larger installed bases. Accordingly, such business combinations and
acquisitions by competitors and/or customers could jeopardize our competitive position. In addition, an acquisition of a major supplier
by a larger company may lead to a cessation of delivery of components that are important to the delivery of our products and will require
us to invest resources to find alternative sources.
The markets we target are cyclical
and it is difficult to predict the length and strength of any downturn or expansion period.
The semiconductor capital equipment market and
industries, which are cyclical, experienced steep downturns and upturns in the last two decades. Although recent fluctuations have been
milder, the capital equipment market can still experience downturns in some years, and we cannot predict when recovery or future declines
will occur or how they will affect our business.
Our operations may be delayed or interrupted,
and our business could suffer if we violate environmental, safety and health, or ESH regulations.
Some of our activities require the use of various
gases, chemicals, hazardous materials and other substances such as solvents and sulfuric acid which may have an impact on the environment.
We are subject to Environmental, Safety and Health (“ESH”) regulations, and a failure to manage the use, storage, transportation,
emission, discharge, recycling or disposal of raw materials or to comply with these ESH regulations, or a failure of any of the above
by a supplier, manufacturer, or other third party in our value chain, could result in (i) regulatory penalties, fines and other legal
liabilities, (ii) suspension of production or delays in operation and capacity expansion, (iii) a decrease in our sales, (iv) an increase
in pollution cleaning fees and other operation costs, or (v) damage to our public image, any of which could harm our business. In addition,
as ESH regulations are becoming more comprehensive and stringent, and may vary by jurisdiction, we may incur a greater amount of capital
expenditures in technology innovation, materials substitution, and the hiring and retention of new or existing personnel, in order to
comply with such regulations, which may adversely affect our results of operations.
Operational risks
We implemented a new ERP system, and challenges
implementing our new system could negatively impact our business and operations.
In January 2026, following a multi-year implementation,
we launched our new enterprise resource planning system (“ERP”). We depend heavily on our ERP to manage our business and report
operating results. Although the system is operational, it requires ongoing maintenance, monitoring, and enhancements, and we may implement
additional modules in the future. The transition introduced new procedures and various new controls over financial reporting, many of
which are still being adjusted to best fit our needs. Inefficiencies may persist until the system and related processes stabilize.
Although our ERP system was launched and is operational,
any deficiencies, malfunctions, or limitations in its design or functionality could adversely affect our ability to maintain accurate
financial records, manage operations efficiently, serve our customers with effective and timely support and produce timely and accurate
financial statements or comply with applicable regulations. System errors, integration challenges with other applications, cybersecurity
vulnerabilities, or unexpected technical issues could disrupt our operations, increase costs, or impair our ability to appropriately forecast
and report results.
Because substantially most of our current sales
are dependent on few specific product lines, factors that adversely affect the pricing and demand for these product lines could substantially
reduce our sales.
We are currently dependent on few process control
product lines. We expect these product lines to continue to account for a substantial portion of our revenues in the coming years. As
a result, factors adversely affecting the pricing of, or demand for, these product lines, such as competition and technological change,
could significantly reduce our sales.
We depend on a small number of large customers,
and the loss of one or more of them could significantly lower our revenues.
Like our peers serving the semiconductor market,
our customer base is highly concentrated among a limited number of large customers. We anticipate that our revenues will continue to depend
on a limited number of major customers, although the companies considered to be our major customers and the percentage of our revenue
represented by each major customer may vary from period to period. As a result of our customer concentration, our financial performance
may fluctuate significantly from period to period based, among others, on exogenous circumstances related to our clients. For example,
it is possible that any of our major customers could terminate its purchasing relationship with us or significantly reduce or delay the
amount of orders for our products, purchase products from our competitors, or develop its own alternative solutions internally. The loss
of any one of our major customers would adversely affect our revenues. Furthermore, if any of our customers become insolvent or have difficulties
meeting their financial obligations to us for any reason, we may suffer losses. For more information regarding our sales by major customers
as percentage of our total sales, see Note 16 to our consolidated financial statements contained elsewhere in this Annual Report.
Our inability to significantly reduce spending
during a protracted slowdown in the semiconductor industry could reduce our prospects of achieving continued profitability.
Historically, we have derived all our revenues,
and we expect to continue to derive practically all of our revenues, from sales of our products and related services to the semiconductor
industry. Our business depends in large part upon capital expenditures by semiconductor manufacturers, which in turn depend upon the current
and anticipated demand for semiconductors. The semiconductor industry has experienced severe and protracted cyclical downturns and upturns.
Cyclical downturns, as those we have experienced in the past, including the slowdown in 2023, may cause material reductions in the demand
for the products and services that we offer, and may result in a decline in our sales. In addition, our ability to significantly reduce
expenses during such cyclical downturn may be limited because of:
| |
• |
our continuing need to invest in research and development;
|
| |
• |
our continuing need to market our new products; and |
| |
• |
our extensive ongoing customer service and support requirements worldwide.
|
Furthermore,
in recent years, we increased our leased facilities and related investments and our operating expenses. In the event of a global recession
or certain other economic conditions forcing the Company to materially reduce its expenses, portions of such facilities may be rendered
obsolete. As a result, we may have difficulty achieving continued profitability during a protracted slowdown.
There can be no assurance that revenues from future
products or product enhancements will be sufficient to recover the development costs or to ensure the sale of inventory related to these
products.
We
must continue to make significant investments in research and development in order to introduce new products and technologies, or to enhance
the performance, features and functionality of our existing products, to keep pace with the competitive landscape and to satisfy customer
demands. Substantial research and development costs are typically incurred before we confirm the technical feasibility and commercial
viability of a new product, and not all development activities result in commercially viable products. There can be no assurance that
revenues from future products or product enhancements will be sufficient to recover the development costs associated with such products
or enhancements. In addition, we cannot be sure that these products or enhancements will receive market acceptance or that we will be
able to sell these products at prices that are favorable to us. Our business will be seriously harmed if we are unable to sell our products
at favorable prices or if the market in which we operate does not accept our products. In addition, in some cases, we accumulate inventories
based on sales forecasts. If such sales forecasts do not materialize, we might need to write-off the related inventory, which will increase
our losses.
New product lines that we may introduce in the
future may contain defects, which will require us to allocate time and financial resources to correct.
Our
new product lines may contain defects when first introduced. If there are defects, we will need to divert the attention of our personnel
from our ongoing product development efforts to address the detection and correction of the defects. We cannot provide assurances that
we will not incur any costs or liabilities or experience any lags or delays in the future. Moreover, the occurrence of such defects, whether
caused by our products or the products of another vendor, may result in significant customer relations problems and adversely affect our
reputation and may impair the market acceptance of our products.
If any of our systems fail to meet or exceed our
internal quality specifications, we cannot ship them until such time as they have met such specifications. If we experience significant
delays or are unable to ship our products to our customers as a result of our internal processes or for any other reason, our business
and reputation may be adversely affected.
Our
products are complex and require technical expertise to design and manufacture. Various problems occasionally arise during the manufacturing
process that may cause delays and/or impair product quality. We actively monitor our manufacturing processes to ensure that our products
meet our internal quality specifications. Any significant delays stemming from the failure of our products to meet or exceed our internal
quality specifications, or for any other reasons, would delay our shipments. Shipment delays could be harmful to our business, revenues
and reputation in the industry.
Our dependence on a single manufacturing facility
per product line magnifies the risk of an interruption in our production capabilities.
As
of the date of this Annual Report, we have two main manufacturing facility for our Optical CD and Raman technology-related product lines,
which are located in Weizmann Science Park, Rehovot and Nes Ziona, Israel, one main manufacturing facility for our XPS and secondary ion
mass spectrometry (“SIMS”) technology related product lines, which is located in Fremont, CA, one main manufacturing facility
for our Chemical Metrology product lines, which is located in Bad Urach, Germany and one main manufacturing facility for our Optical Metrology
for Advanced Packaging product lines, which is located in Mannheim, Germany (the "Manufacturing Facilities"). These Manufacturing Facilities
include special clean manufacturing jigs and/or room environments, which are customized to our needs. In addition, most of our ongoing
inventories, including our main warehouse and work in process, are located in these Manufacturing Facilities. Although we adopted measures
to protect these Manufacturing Facilities and inventories, such as implementing a disaster recovery plan which includes potential usage
of laboratory facilities in all major sites, any event affecting any of our Manufacturing Facilities or affecting our ability to work
in our Manufacturing Facilities such as requirement of working from remote location, including natural disaster, labor stoppages or armed
conflict, may disrupt or indefinitely discontinue our manufacturing capabilities and could significantly impair our ability to fulfill
orders and generate revenues, thus negatively impacting our business.
Our lease agreements for our Manufacturing Facilities
include provisions that exempt the landlord and others from liability for damages to our Manufacturing Facilities.
Pursuant
to the lease agreements for our Manufacturing Facilities, the landlord and anyone on its behalf, and additional tenants are exempt from
any liability for direct or consequential damages to our Manufacturing Facilities, except in the event of willful misconduct. While we
have obtained insurance policies against certain damages, the aforementioned exemption of liability could compromise our ability to recover
the full amount of such damages, and consequently we may incur substantial costs upon the occurrence of such damages.
Because shipment dates may
be changed and some of our customers may cancel or delay orders with little or no penalty, and since we encounter difficulties in collecting
cancellation fees from our customers, our backlog may not be a reliable indicator of actual sales and financial results.
We schedule production of our systems based upon
order backlog and customer forecasts. We include in backlog only those orders received from the customers in which a delivery date has
been specified. In general, our ability to rely on our backlog for future forecasting and planning is limited because shipment dates may
be changed, some customers may cancel or delay orders with little or no penalty, and our ability to collect cancellation fees from customers
is not assured. Thus, our backlog may not be a reliable indicator of actual sales and financial results and this may affect the accuracy
of our forecasts.
We may not be successful in our efforts to complete
and integrate current and/or future acquisitions, which could disrupt our current business activities and adversely affect our results
of operations or future growth.
Any acquisition may involve many risks, including
the risks of:
| |
• |
diverting management’s attention and other resources from our
ongoing business concerns; |
| |
• |
entering markets in which we have no direct prior experience;
|
| |
• |
improperly evaluating new services, products and markets; |
| |
• |
being unable to maintain uniform standards, controls, procedures
and policies; |
| |
• |
failing to comply with governmental requirements pertaining to acquisitions
of local companies or assets by foreign entities; |
| |
• |
being unable to integrate new technologies or personnel; |
| |
• |
incurring the expenses of any undisclosed or potential liabilities;
and |
| |
• |
the departure of key management and employees. |
On January 30, 2025, we completed the acquisition
of Sentronics Metrology GmbH (“Sentronics”). If we are unable to successfully integrate Sentronics or any of our future acquisitions,
our ability to grow our business or to operate our business effectively could be reduced, and our business, financial condition and operating
results could suffer. Even if we are successful in completing acquisitions, we cannot assure that we will be able to integrate the operations
of the acquired business without encountering difficulty regarding different business strategies with respect to marketing and integration
of personnel with disparate business backgrounds and corporate cultures. Further, in certain cases, mergers and acquisitions require special
approvals, or are subject to scrutiny by the local authorities, and failing to comply with such requirements or to receive such approvals,
may prevent or limit our ability to complete the acquisitions as well as expose us to legal proceedings prior or following the consummation
of such acquisitions. In some cases, such proceedings, if initiated, may conclude in a requirement to divest portions of the acquired
business. As of the date of this Annual Report, we are not aware of any pending proceedings as such in connection with the acquisition
of Sentronics.
We depend on continuous cooperation with Process
Equipment Manufacturers (“PEMs”) to enable sales of our systems which are integrated with the process equipment, and the loss
of PEMs as business partners could harm our business.
We believe that sales of systems which are integrated
with the process equipment will continue to be an important source of our products revenues. Sales of such integrated systems, which include
Optical CD integrated metrology and chemical metrology, depend upon the ability of PEMs to sell semiconductor equipment products that
are able to integrate with these metrology systems. If our PEMs are unable to sell such products, if they choose to focus their attention
on products that do not integrate our systems, or if they choose to develop their own metrology solutions, our business could suffer.
If we were to lose our PEMs as business partners for any reason, our inability to realize sales from such systems could significantly
harm our business. In addition, we may not be able to develop or market such new systems, which could slow or prevent our growth.
Some of our commercial agreements
with PEMs and customers may include exclusivity provisions and limitations on the use of certain intellectual property. Such limitations
may prevent us from engaging in certain business relationships with third parties, and may limit our ability to use certain elements of
our intellectual property. As a result, our ability to introduce new products in relevant markets might be affected.
Some of our commercial agreements with PEMs and
customers may include exclusivity provisions, which prevent us from engaging in certain business relationships with third parties. In
addition, some of our commercial agreements with PEMs also include limitations on the use of certain joint intellectual property. These
exclusivity obligations and limitations are often used as a tool to promote the development and the penetration of innovative new solutions,
and are usually limited in terms of scope and length. When considering whether to enter into any such exclusivity arrangements or accepting
such limitations, we usually take into consideration the terms of the exclusivity (e.g., length and scope), the expected benefit to the
Company, and the risks and limitations associated with such exclusivity or limiting undertakings. Exclusivity obligations or limitation
of use relating to certain parts of our technology and products may affect our ability to commercialize our products, engage in potentially
beneficial business relationships with third parties (including by means of a merger or acquisition), or introduce new products into relevant
markets, which could slow or prevent our growth.
We depend on a limited number of suppliers, and
in some cases a sole supplier. Any disruption, delay or termination of these supply channels may adversely affect our ability to manufacture
our products and to deliver them to our customers.
We purchase components, subassemblies and services
from a limited number of suppliers and occasionally from a single or a sole source. Disruption or termination of these sources could occur
(due to several factors, including, but not limited to, supplier capacity limitations, low availability of raw materials, bankruptcy,
work stoppages due to a pandemic, or other reasons, acts of war, terrorism, fire, earthquake, energy shortages, flooding or other natural
disasters), and these disruptions could have at least a temporary adverse effect on our operations. Although we generally maintain an
inventory of critical components used in the manufacture and assembly of our systems, such supplies may not be sufficient to avoid potential
delays that could have an adverse effect on our business.
In addition, while in some instances we may have
an escrow agreement in place, the acquisition of a major supplier by a larger company may lead to a cease delivery of components that
are important to the delivery of our products and will require us to invest resources to find alternative sources.
To date, we have not experienced any material
disruption or termination of our supply sources where replacement material has not been found and qualified.
A prolonged inability on our part to obtain components
included in our systems on a cost-effective basis could adversely impact our ability to deliver products on a timely basis, which could
harm our sales and customer relationships.
The disclosure rules regarding the use of conflict
minerals may affect our relationships with suppliers and customers.
The Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC,
requires certain disclosure by companies that use conflict minerals in their products, with substantial supply chain verification requirements
in the event that the materials come from, or could have come from, the Democratic Republic of the Congo or adjoining countries. These
rules and verification requirements may impose additional costs on us and on our suppliers, and limit the sources or increase the prices
of materials used in our products. Among other things, this rule could affect sourcing at competitive prices and availability in sufficient
quantities of certain minerals used in the manufacture of components that are incorporated into our products. In addition, the number
of suppliers who provide conflict-free minerals may be limited, and there may be material costs associated with complying with the disclosure
requirements, such as costs related to the process of determining the source of certain minerals used in our products, as well as costs
of possible changes to products, processes, or sources of supply as a consequence of such verification activities. We may not be able
to sufficiently verify the origins of the relevant minerals used in components manufactured by third parties through the procedures that
we implement, and we may encounter challenges to satisfy those customers who require that all of the components of our products be certified
as conflict-free, which could place us at a competitive disadvantage if we are unable to do so. While we have created processes and procedures
designed to enable compliance with these rules, if in the future we are unable to certify that our products are conflict free, we may
face challenges with our customers, which could place us at a competitive disadvantage and harm our reputation.
Attention to ESG matters and conservation measures
may adversely impact our business or that of our manufacturers.
There has been an evolving public focus by investors,
customers, environmental and social activists, the media, politicians, governmental authorities, nongovernmental organizations and other
stakeholders on a variety of environmental, social, and governance (“ESG”) matters. We experience pressure to make commitments
relating to ESG matters that affect us, including the design and implementation of specific risk mitigation strategic initiatives relating
to ESG.
This emphasis on ESG matters has resulted and
may result in the addition of new and varied laws and regulations, including reporting requirements. While, in some cases, such proposed
regulations are currently litigated and on hold, if we are ultimately required to comply in whole or in part with these rules, or if nonuniform
rules across jurisdictions are enacted, we may incur additional legal, accounting, and financial compliance expenses. Moreover, this could
result in increased management time and attention to ensure we are compliant with the regulations and expectations.
In April 2025, we published our second Sustainability
Insight Review, in which we provided details on our strategy and principles to practices associated with climate change, human capital
and diversity, governance, sustainability, diversity of our board and other Company policies. If we fail, or are perceived to fail, to
meet the ESG values, standards and metrics that we set for ourselves, or our articulated public benefit purposes, or if we fail to meet
regulatory requirements for ESG disclosures, we may experience negative publicity and a loss of customers, employees, or suppliers, eroded
stakeholder trust, an impact on our reputation, or be subject to regulatory fines or penalties or litigation, which could adversely affect
our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Our lengthy sales cycle increases our exposure
to customer delays in orders, which may result in obsolete inventory and volatile quarterly revenues.
Sales of our systems depend, in significant part,
upon our customers adding new manufacturing capacity or expanding existing manufacturing capacity, both of which involve a significant
capital commitment. We may experience delays in finalizing sales while a customer evaluates and approves an initial purchase of our systems.
Our sales cycle for new customers, products or applications, may take longer than twelve (12) months to complete. During this time, we
may expend substantial funds and management effort, but fail to make any sales. Lengthy sales cycles subject us to a number of significant
risks, including inventory obsolescence and fluctuations in operating results, over which we have limited control.
Due to intense competition for highly skilled
personnel, we may fail to attract, recruit, retain and develop qualified employees, which could materially and adversely impact our business,
financial condition and results of operations.
We compete in a market that involves rapidly changing
technological and regulatory developments that require a wide-ranging set of expertise and intellectual capital. In order for us to successfully
compete and grow, we must attract, recruit, retain and develop the necessary personnel who can provide the needed expertise across the
entire spectrum of our intellectual capital needs. While we have a number of our key personnel who have substantial experience with our
operations, we must also develop and exercise our personnel to provide succession plans capable of maintaining continuity in the midst
of the inevitable unpredictability of human capital. Our principal research and development activities are conducted from our headquarters
in Israel and our subsidiaries in the U.S and Germany, and we face significant competition for suitably skilled developers in these regions.
The high-tech industry in Israel, the U.S. and other territories we operate in has experienced significant levels of employee attrition
and is currently facing a severe shortage of skilled human capital. We may encounter higher attrition rates in the future depending on
the economic growth of each territory. We may not succeed in recruiting additional experienced or professional personnel, retaining current
personnel or effectively replacing current personnel who depart with qualified or effective successors. Many of the companies with
which we compete for experienced personnel have greater resources than us.
Our effort to retain and develop personnel may
also result in significant additional expenses, which could adversely affect our profitability. There can be no assurance that qualified
employees will continue to be employed or that we will be able to attract and retain qualified personnel in the future. Failure to retain
or attract qualified personnel could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Risks Related to Our Incorporation
and Location in Israel
Conditions in Israel, including Israel’s
conflicts with certain parties in the region, as well as political and economic instability, may adversely affect our business, our results
of operations and our ability to raise additional funds.
We are incorporated under the laws of the State
of Israel, and many of our employees, including certain management members, operate from our offices in Rehovot, Israel. In addition,
most of our officers and directors are residents of Israel. Accordingly, our business and operations are directly affected by economic,
political, geopolitical and military conditions in Israel.
Since the establishment of the State of Israel
in 1948 and in recent years, armed conflicts between Israel and its neighboring countries and terrorist organizations active in the region
have involved missile strikes, hostile infiltrations, terrorism against civilian targets in various parts of Israel, and recently abduction
of soldiers and citizens.
Following the October 7, 2023 attacks by Hamas
terrorists in Israel's southern border, Israel declared war against Hamas and since then, Israel has been involved in military conflicts
with Hamas, Hezbollah, a terrorist organization based in Lebanon, and Iran, both directly and through proxies such as the Houthi movement
in Yemen, armed groups in Iraq and other terrorist organizations. Additionally, following the fall of the Assad regime in Syria, Israel
has conducted limited military operations targeting certain Syrian military assets, Iranian military assets and infrastructure linked
to Hezbollah and other Iran-supported groups. Although certain ceasefire agreements have been reached with Hamas and Lebanon (with respect
to Hezbollah), and some Iranian proxies have declared a halt to their attacks, there is no assurance that these agreements will be upheld.
In October 2025, a ceasefire agreement was reached between Israel and Hamas, leading to a cessation or direct conflict between these parties.
However, the situation remains volatile, with the potential for renewed escalation, particularly with escalated tensions between the U.S.,
Iran and Israel. While there are currently attempts for diplomatic solution, there can be no assurance that such solution will be reached
and that there will not be further escalations to the situation. The intensity and duration of these conflicts, as well as their economic
implications for the Company and Israel’s economy, remain difficult to predict. These events may have wider macroeconomic implications,
including deterioration of certain indicators of Israel’s economic standing, for instance, a downgrade in Israel’s credit
rating by rating agencies such as by Moody’s, S&P Global, and Fitch.
Certain of our employees and consultants in Israel
have been called, and additional employees may be called, for reserve duty service in the recent or future wars or other armed conflicts.
Such employees may be absent for an extended period of time. As a result, our operations may be disrupted by such absences, which disruption
may materially and adversely affect our business and results of operations. In addition, military reservists in Israel are expected to
perform long reserve duty service in the coming years, which could further impact our operations.
The global perception of Israel and Israeli companies,
influenced by actions by international judicial bodies, may lead to increased sanctions and other negative measures against Israel, as
well as Israeli companies and academic institutions. There is also a growing movement among countries, activists, and organizations to
boycott Israeli goods, services and academic research or restrict business with Israel, which could affect business operations. If these
efforts become widespread, along with any future rulings from international tribunals against Israel, they could negatively impact our
business operations.
Further, prior to the October 2023 war, the Israeli
government pursued changes to Israel’s judicial system and has recently renewed its efforts to effect such changes. In response
to the foregoing developments, certain individuals, organizations, and institutions, both within and outside of Israel, voiced concerns
that such proposed changes, if adopted, may negatively impact the business environment in Israel. Such proposed changes may also lead
to political instability or civil unrest. If such changes to Israel’s judicial system are pursued by the government and approved
by the parliament, this may have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations, and ability to raise additional funds, if deemed
necessary by our management and board of directors.
Risks Related to Our Indebtedness
and Capital Structure
Our convertible senior notes due 2030 (“2030
Convertible Senior Notes”) may impact our financial results, result in the dilution of existing shareholders, create downward pressure
on the price of our ordinary shares, and restrict our ability to take advantage of future opportunities.
On September 5, 2025, we closed an offering of
$750 million aggregate principal amount of 0% Convertible Senior Notes due 2030 in a private offering to qualified institutional buyers
pursuant to Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The 2030 Convertible Senior Notes affect our earnings per diluted
share figures, as procedures under the Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2020-06 require that we include in our calculation
of earnings per diluted share the number of ordinary shares into which the 2030 Convertible Senior Notes are convertible. See also Note
11 to our consolidated financial statements contained elsewhere in this Annual Report.
The 2030 Convertible Senior Notes may be converted,
under the conditions of the indenture governing the 2030 Convertible Senior Notes (the “Indenture”), during the periods and
subject to the conditions specified in the Indenture, into cash, our ordinary shares, or a or a combination thereof, at our election.
If our ordinary shares are issued to the holders of the 2030 Convertible Senior Notes upon conversion, there may be dilution to our shareholders’
equity and the market price of our ordinary shares may decrease due to the additional selling pressure in the market.
Furthermore, the Indenture prohibits us from engaging
in certain mergers or acquisitions unless, among other things, the surviving entity assumes our obligations under the 2030 Convertible
Senior Notes. In addition, if a takeover constitutes a “fundamental change” (as defined in the Indenture), then noteholders
will have the right to require us to repurchase their 2030 Convertible Senior Notes for cash, and if a takeover constitutes a “make-whole
fundamental change” (as defined in the Indenture), then we may be required to temporarily increase the conversion rate of the 2030
Convertible Senior Notes. These and other provisions in the indenture could deter or prevent a third party from acquiring us even when
the acquisition may be favorable.
We currently anticipate that we will be able to
rely on and to implement certain clarifications from the applicable Tax Authorities, with respect to the administration of our Israeli
withholding tax obligations in relation to consideration to be paid to the holders of the Convertible Senior Notes upon their future conversion
and settlement as well as other related tax aspects. In addition, on November 19, 2025, we applied for a tax ruling from the ITA in order
to obtain clarity with respect to the Israeli withholding tax treatment in connection with the Convertible Senior Notes. Unexpected failure
to ultimately obtain such anticipated clarifications from the Israeli Tax Authorities could potentially result in increased Israeli withholding
tax gross-up costs.
We may not have the ability to raise the funds
necessary to settle conversions of the 2030 Convertible Senior Notes, if we are obligated to settle such conversions, in whole or in part,
in cash, repurchase the 2030 Convertible Senior Notes upon a fundamental change or repay the 2030 Convertible Senior Notes in cash at
their maturity, and our future debt may contain limitations on our ability to pay cash upon conversion or repurchase of the 2030
Convertible Senior Notes.
Holders of the 2030 Convertible Senior Notes have
the right, subject to and under the terms of the Indenture to require us to repurchase all or a portion of their 2030 Convertible Senior
Notes upon the occurrence of a “fundamental change” before the applicable maturity date, at a repurchase price equal to 100%
of the principal amount of such 2030 Convertible Senior Notes to be repurchased, plus accrued and unpaid “special interest”
(as defined in the Indenture), if any. We may not have enough available cash or be able to obtain financing at the time we are required
to make such repurchases of the 2030 Convertible Senior Notes and/or repay the 2030 Convertible Senior Notes upon maturity and/or settle
conversions of the 2030 Convertible Senior Notes (should we elect to settle such conversions, in whole or in part, in cash or should we
be required to settle such conversions, in whole or in part, in cash, if in the future we irrevocably elect to settle the conversions,
in whole or in part, in cash).
Our ability to repurchase or to pay cash upon
conversion of the 2030 Convertible Senior Notes may be limited by law, regulatory authority or agreements governing our future indebtedness.
Our failure to repurchase the 2030 Convertible Senior Notes at a time when the repurchase is required by the indenture or to pay cash
upon conversion of the 2030 Convertible Senior Notes when required or at maturity as required by the indenture would constitute a default
under the indenture. A default under the indenture or the fundamental change itself could also lead to a default under agreements governing
our future indebtedness. If the payment of the related indebtedness were to be accelerated after any applicable notice or grace periods,
we may not have sufficient funds to repay the indebtedness and repurchase the 2030 Convertible Senior Notes or to pay cash upon conversion
of the 2030 Convertible Senior Notes or at maturity.
Our capped call transactions may affect the value
of our debt and ordinary shares.
In connection with the pricing of the 2030 Convertible
Senior Notes, we entered into privately-negotiated capped call transactions (“Capped Calls”) with certain financial institutions.
The Capped Calls are expected generally to reduce the potential dilution to our ordinary shares upon any conversion of the 2030 Convertible
Senior Notes and/or offset any cash payments we are required to make in excess of the principal amount of converted 2030 Convertible Senior
Notes, as the case may be, with such reduction and/or offset subject to a cap.
The Capped Call counterparties and/or their respective
affiliates may modify their hedge positions by entering into or unwinding various derivatives with respect to our ordinary shares and/or
purchasing or selling our ordinary shares or other securities of ours in secondary market transactions prior to the maturity of the 2030
Convertible Senior Notes (and are likely to do so following any conversion of the notes, any repurchase of the notes by us on any fundamental
change repurchase date, any redemption date or any other date on which the notes are retired by us, in each case, if we exercise the relevant
election under the Capped Calls and in connection with any negotiated unwind or modification of the Capped Calls). This activity could
cause or avoid an increase or a decrease in the market price of our ordinary shares or the 2030 Convertible Senior Notes.
The potential effect, if any, of these transactions
and activities on the trading price of our ordinary shares or the 2030 Convertible Senior Notes will depend in part on market conditions.
Any of these activities could adversely affect the trading price of our ordinary shares or the 2030 Convertible Senior Notes.
Financial, legal, regulatory and taxation risks
Because most of our revenues are generated in
U.S. dollars, but a significant portion of our expenses is incurred in currencies other than U.S. dollars, and mainly New Israeli Shekels
and Euro, our profit margin may be seriously harmed by currency fluctuations.
We generate most of our revenues in U.S. dollars
but incur a significant portion of our expenses in currencies other than U.S. dollar, and mainly New Israeli Shekel (commonly referred
to as NIS) and Euro. In accordance with ASC 842 of lease accounting standard, we are required to present a significant NIS linked liability
related to our operational leases in Israel. In addition, the operations of our German subsidiaries Nova Measuring Instruments GmbH and
Sentronics Metrology GmbH are mainly Euro based. As a result, we are exposed to risk of devaluation of the U.S. dollar in relation to
the NIS, Euro and other currencies. In such event, the dollar cost of our operations in countries other than the U.S. will increase and
our dollar measured results of operations will be adversely affected. During 2025, the U.S. dollar devaluated against the NIS by 12.5%,
after being revaluated by approximately 17.3% in the previous three years, and devaluated against the Euro by 11.3%, after being revaluated
by approximately 8.7% in the previous three years. We cannot predict the future trends in the rate of devaluation or revaluation of the
U.S. dollar against the NIS and the Euro, and our cost of operations could be adversely affected by such trends.
We are subject to various regulations and standards
relating to data privacy and security. Failure to comply with any applicable privacy, security, data protection laws, regulations, standards
or other requirement could have an adverse effect on our business prospects, results of operations, and financial condition.
The regulatory framework for privacy and security
issues worldwide is rapidly evolving and is likely to remain uncertain for the foreseeable future. In particular, in the European Union,
the General Data Protection Regulation (the “GDPR”) imposes more stringent data protection requirements and provides for greater
penalties for noncompliance. For example, we collect, use, maintain and otherwise process certain personal data about candidates and employees.
Our ability to collect, use, maintain or otherwise process personal data has been, and could be further, restricted by existing and new
laws and regulations relating to privacy and data collection and protection, including the GDPR.
Additionally, the uncertainty created by current
and future privacy laws and regulations can be compounded when services hosted in one jurisdiction are directed at users in another jurisdiction.
For instance, European data protection rules may apply to companies which are not established in the European Union (“EU”)
(this is the so-called extraterritorial scope of the GDPR). The GDPR has an even wider territorial scope and contains significant penalties
for non-compliance. The GDPR, among other things, imposes requirements to provide detailed and transparent disclosures about how personal
data is collected and processed, grants rights for data subjects to access, delete or object to the processing of their personal data,
provides for a mandatory breach notification to supervisory authorities (and in certain cases, affected individuals) of certain data breaches,
sets limitations on the retention of personal data and outlines significant documentary requirements to demonstrate compliance through
policies, procedures, training and audits. To further complicate matters in Europe, to date, supervisory authorities in the member states
have some flexibility when implementing European Directives and certain aspects of the GDPR, which can lead to diverging national rules.
European supervisory authorities have been very active in terms of enforcing data protection rules, including with respect to cookie-related
matters.
Additionally, organizations transferring personal
data across-borders need to implement a lawful transfer mechanism, for example by executing Standard Contractual Clauses or registering
with the Data Privacy Framework, and to perform a data transfer impact assessment to evaluate the legal regime applicable in the destination
country, in particular applicable surveillance laws and rights of individuals, and that additional measures and/or contractual provisions
may need to be put in place. However, the nature of these additional measures is currently uncertain.
We are also subject to evolving EEA privacy laws
on cookies and tracking technologies, including the Privacy and Electronic Communications (EC Directive) Regulations 2003, “ePrivacy
Directive”. Informed and freely given consent is required for the placement of non- essential cookies and similar technologies on
websites available in the EEA. The GDPR also imposes conditions on obtaining valid consent for cookies collecting personal data, such
as a prohibition on pre-checked consents and a requirement to ensure separate consents are sought for each type of cookie or similar technology.
Recent European court and regulatory decisions are driving increased attention to cookies and tracking technologies, which could increase
costs and subject us to additional liabilities.
Similarly, there have been laws and regulations
adopted throughout the United States and Israel that impose obligations in areas such as privacy, in particular protection of personal
data and implementing adequate cybersecurity measures to protect such data. One of the most prominent current privacy state laws is the
California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) as amended by the California Privacy Rights Act (CPRA). Additionally, the U.S. has recently seen
an increase in claims and litigation based on the California Invasion of Privacy Act (CIPA) and the Electronic Communications Privacy
Act (ECPA) in regard to tracking tools such as cookies and similar technologies. This trend exposes companies to potential statutory damages,
class action lawsuits, and reputational harm. Additional U.S. states have implemented, or are in the process of implementing, similar
new laws or regulations that regulate privacy rights and obligations. More generally, some observers have noted that these new state privacy
laws could mark the beginning of a trend toward more stringent United States federal privacy legislation, which could increase our potential
liability and adversely affect our business.
The Cyberspace Administration of China created
uncertainty by publishing the Personal Information Protection Law, which came into force on June 1, 2023. For the outbound data transfer
before the effective date, the law included a rectification period of six months ending on December 1, 2023 (inclusive). This law imposes
more stringent data protection requirements, restricts cross-border data transfers, and imposes significant fines for non-compliant conduct.
In addition, we are subject to the Israeli Privacy
Protection Law, 1981 (the “PPL”) and its regulations, as well as the guidelines of the Israeli Privacy Protection Authority.
There have also been privacy bills enacted in
other countries around the world which have introduced new or expanded privacy, security, cyber-security and artificial intelligence requirements
and we expect that legislation will continue to evolve in the coming years. For example, the rising adoption of AI and Generative AI in
daily operations and products poses additional and new risks, including, without limitation, data privacy and security risks, intellectual
property infringement, ownership issues and/or confidentiality issues. Threats include potential data leaks, social engineering attacks,
and decision-making based on manipulated information. Growing regulatory requirements for information security and data protection add
to the challenge. Moreover, attackers leverage AI as both a tool and exploit vulnerabilities in AI systems. Therefore, it is difficult
to determine whether and how such existing laws and regulations will apply to and impact the internet and our business.
In December 2023, new laws regulating artificial
intelligence have been enacted in China. The European Union’s Artificial Intelligence Act (the “EU AI Act”) was published
in the EU Official Journal on July 12, 2024, and is the first comprehensive horizontal legal framework for the regulation of AI across
the EU. The EU AI Act entered into force on August 1, 2024. While the majority of its obligations are expected to take effect by 2026, provisions
regulating prohibited AI practices and AI literacy came into effect on February 2, 2025, and provisions pertaining to General Purpose
AI Models on August 2, 2025. The fines under the EU AI Act range from (i) the higher of €35,000,000 or up to 7 percent of a company’s
total worldwide annual turnover for non-compliance with prohibited AI practices, to (ii) the higher of €7,500,000 or up to 1 percent
of a company’s total worldwide annual turnover for the supply of incorrect, incomplete, or misleading information to notified bodies
and national competent authorities. Once gradually applicable, the EU AI Act will have a material impact on the way artificial intelligence
is regulated in the EU, including requirements around transparency, conformity assessments and monitoring, risk assessments, human oversight,
security, accuracy, and general purpose artificial intelligence models. Further, the cost to comply with such laws or regulations could
be significant and could increase our operating expenses, require technical changes, development and implementations, which could adversely
affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. The European Commission’s Digital Omnibus Proposal, published
in November 2025, includes proposed amendments to certain EU laws and regulations, including (among others) the EU AI Act and the GDPR.
However, the proposal remains at an early stage of the EU legislative process. California also recently enacted new laws that further
regulate use of AI technologies and provide consumers with additional protections around companies’ use of AI technologies, such
as requiring companies to disclose certain uses of Generative AI. Such additional regulations may impact our ability to develop, use,
procure and commercialize AI technologies in the future.
The EU Data Act, adopted on November 27, 2023,
establishes rules for data sharing (personal data and non-personal data) and reuse in the European Union, with most obligations having
taken effect in September 2025. Amongst others, the EU Data Act sets general conditions for data sharing between businesses and imposes
measures to boost fairness and competition in the European cloud market. Additionally, the EU Data Act safeguards companies from unfair
contractual terms related to data sharing imposed by dominant market players. Compliance may require us to implement new data management
protocols, technological development and changes of our semiconductors and review contractual practices, potentially increasing operational
costs.
Any inability to adequately address privacy and
security concerns or comply with applicable privacy and data security laws, rules and regulations could have an adverse effect on our
business prospects, results of operations and/or financial position.
We participate in government programs under which
we receive research and development grants. Some of these programs imposes restrictions on our ability to use the technologies developed
under these programs. The reduction or termination of these programs would increase our costs.
We participate in Israel Innovation Authority,
or IIA royalty free grant programs. In addition, through the years, we participated in consortia which are either solely managed and funded
by the IIA, or by the EU commission or jointly funded by the EU commission and the National Innovation Authorities of the participating
companies, i.e. The Israel Innovation Authority can jointly fund Nova Ltd. participation and the BMBF (The German National Innovation
Authority) can jointly fund Nova Measuring Instruments GmbH. To maintain our eligibility for these programs, we must continue to
meet certain conditions.
Some of these programs also restrict our ability
to manufacture particular products and transfer particular technology, which were developed as part of the local Innovation Authority
funding agent (i.e., the IIA in Israel and the BMBF in Germany) programs, outside of the country in which these were manufactured. The
restrictions associated with these programs may require obtaining approval of the research and development committee nominated by the
IIA or BMBF for certain actions and transactions and pay additional payments to the IIA or BMBF. Approval to manufacture products, which
their development was partially funded by the local Innovation Authority funding agent, the country they are manufactured in or consent
to the transfer of technology, if requested, might not be granted and if granted, may increase our financial liabilities to the respected
Innovation Authority. In addition, if we fail to comply with certain restrictions associated with formerly received funding from IIA or
BMBF, we may be subject to criminal charges.
We may be further exposed to risks related to
the receipt of funding from other governments or governmental agencies in connection with strategic development programs, under which
we receive funding. Under such strategic development programs, governments and governmental agencies typically have the right to terminate
the program’s funding at any time. In addition, a project may be terminated by a mutual agreement, if the parties determine that
the project's goals or milestones are not being achieved. As a result, there is no assurance that these sources of external funding will
continue to be available to us in the future. Moreover, under the terms of certain governmental funding programs in which we receive funding,
the applicable granting agency has the right to audit the costs that we incur, directly and indirectly, in connection with such programs.
Any such audit could result in modifications to, or even termination of, the applicable governmental funding program. Any adverse finding
resulting from any such audit could lead to penalties (financial or otherwise), termination of funding programs, suspension of payments
or other adverse consequences to our ability to receive governmental funding. In addition, obligations related to grants received from
the IIA grants bear an annual interest which are linked to the U.S. dollar. Pursuant to the latest IIA regulations, grants received until
January 1, 1999, bear no interest. Grants received before June 30, 2017, bear an annual interest rate that applied at the time of
the approval of the applicable IIA file, and that interest rate will apply to all of the funding received under that IIA approval. Grants
received from the IIA after June 30, 2017, bear an annual interest rate based on the 12-month London Interbank Offered Rate, or LIBOR,
until December 31, 2023, and as of January 1, 2024, bear an annual interest rate based on the 12-month Secured Overnight Financing Rate,
or the SOFR, or at an alternative rate published by the Bank of Israel, with the addition of 0.72%. Grants approved after January 1, 2024,
will bear the higher of (i) the 12 months SOFR interest rate, plus 1%, or (ii) a fixed annual interest rate of 4%.
The application of tax laws is subject to interpretation
and if tax authorities challenge our methodologies or our analysis of our tax rates it could result in an increase to our worldwide effective
tax rate and cause us to change the way we operate our business.
The application of the tax laws of various jurisdictions
to our international business activities (as well as to entities which we acquired) is subject to interpretation and also depends on our
ability to operate our business in a manner consistent with our corporate structure and intercompany arrangements. The tax authorities
of the jurisdictions in which we (and entities we acquired) operate may challenge our methodologies for valuing developed technology or
intercompany arrangements, including the transfer pricing, or determine that the manner in which we (and the entities we acquired) operate
the business does not achieve the expected tax consequences, which could result in tax and penalty payments and in an increase of our
worldwide effective tax rate, and could adversely affect our financial position and results of operations.
A certain degree of judgment is required in evaluating
our tax positions and determining our provision for income taxes. In the ordinary course of business, there are many transactions and
calculations for which the ultimate tax determination is uncertain. For example, our effective tax rates could be adversely affected by
earnings being lower than anticipated in countries where we have lower statutory rates and higher than anticipated in countries where
we have higher statutory rates, by changes in foreign currency exchange rates or by changes in the relevant tax, accounting and other
laws, regulations, principles and interpretations. As we operate in numerous taxing jurisdictions, the application of tax laws can be
subject to diverging and sometimes conflicting interpretations by tax authorities of these jurisdictions. It is not uncommon for tax authorities
in different countries to have conflicting views. In addition, tax laws are dynamic and subject to change as new laws are passed and new
interpretations of the law are issued or applied. For example, the work being carried out by the OECD on base erosion and profit shifting
as a response to increasing globalization of trade could result in changes in tax treaties or the introduction of new legislation that
could impose an additional tax on businesses. As a result of changes to laws or interpretations, our tax positions could be challenged,
and our income tax expenses could increase in the future.
For instance, if tax authorities in any of the
countries in which we operate were to successfully challenge our transfer prices, they could require us to reallocate our income to reflect
transfer pricing adjustments, which could result in an increased tax liability to us. In addition, if the country from which the income
was reallocated did not agree with the reallocation asserted by the first country (including in the process of Mutual Agreement Procedure
or otherwise), we could become subject to tax on the same income in both countries, resulting in double taxation. If tax authorities were
to allocate income to a higher tax jurisdiction, subject our income to double taxation or assess interest and penalties, it could increase
our tax liability, which could adversely affect our financial position and results of operations.
The enactment of legislation implementing changes
in taxation of international business activities, the adoption of other corporate tax reform policies, or changes in tax legislation or
policies could impact our future financial position and results of operations.
There can be no assurance that our effective tax
rate for the year ended December 31, 2025 will not change over time as a result of changes in corporate income tax rates or other changes
in the tax laws the jurisdictions in which we operate. Any changes in tax laws could have an adverse impact on our financial results.
Corporate tax reform, base-erosion efforts and tax transparency continue to be high priorities in many tax jurisdictions where we have
business operations. As a result, policies regarding corporate income and other taxes in numerous jurisdictions are under heightened scrutiny
and tax reform legislation is being proposed or enacted in a number of jurisdictions. For example, the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022
signed into law in the United States on August 16, 2022 among other changes, introduced a 15% corporate minimum tax on certain corporations.
In addition, in July 2025, Public Law No: 119-21, known as the “One Big Beautiful Bill Act” (the OBBBA), was signed into law.
The OBBBA made certain changes to U.S. federal income tax laws, which could have implications for us and also for investors. In particular,
the OBBBA has modified the rules applicable to Foreign Derived Deduction Eligible Income (FDDEI) (formerly Foreign Derived Intangible
Income), decreasing the percentage of FDDEI not subject to tax in the U.S. from 37.5% to 33.34%. The change in FDDEI percentage can have
a material and adverse impact to our effective tax rate beginning in 2026. In addition, there have been proposals to impose retaliatory
measures with respect to jurisdictions that have, or are likely to, put in place tax rules that are extraterritorial or disproportionately
affect American companies. Such proposals have since been withdrawn as the G7 agreed to exempt U.S. companies from certain Organization
for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) Pillar Two global minimum tax provisions (discussed in more detail below), creating a
“side-by-side” system, which is described in the Side-by-Side Package released on January 5, 2026. However, the interaction
of the U.S. tax rules with such side-by-side system remains unclear. We are currently unable to predict whether any changes in U.S. federal
tax laws will occur in response and, if so, the ultimate impact on our business.
In addition, there is growing pressure in many
jurisdictions and from multinational organizations such as the OECD and the EU to amend existing international taxation rules in order
to align the tax regimes with current global business practices. Specifically, in October 2015, the OECD published its final package of
measures for reform of the international tax rules as a product of its Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) initiative, which was endorsed
by the G20 finance ministers. Many of the initiatives in the BEPS package required and resulted in specific amendments to the domestic
tax legislation of various jurisdictions and to existing tax treaties. We continuously monitor these developments. Although many of the
BEPS measures have already been implemented or are currently being implemented globally (including, in certain cases, through adoption
of the OECD’s “multilateral convention” (to which Israel is also a party) to effect changes to tax treaties which entered
into force on July 1, 2018 and through the European Union’s “Anti Tax Avoidance” Directives), it is still difficult
in some cases to assess to what extent these changes our tax liabilities in the jurisdictions in which we conduct our business or to what
extent they may impact the way in which we conduct our business or our effective tax rate due to the unpredictability and interdependency
of these potential changes. In January 2019 the OECD announced further work in continuation of the BEPS project, focusing on two “pillars”.
On October 8, 2021, 136 countries approved a statement known as the OECD BEPS Inclusive Framework, which builds upon the OECD’s
continuation of the BEPS project. The first pillar is focused on the allocation of taxing rights between countries for in-scope large
multinational enterprises (with revenue in excess of Euro 20 billion and profitability of at least 10%) that sell goods and services into
countries with little or no local physical presence. The second pillar is focused on developing a global minimum tax rate of at least
15 percent applicable to in-scope multinational enterprises (with revenue in excess of Euro 750 million). Israel is one of the 136 jurisdictions
that has agreed in principle to the adoption of the global minimum tax rate. Given these developments, it is generally expected that tax
authorities in various jurisdictions in which we operate may increase their audit activity and may seek to challenge some of the tax positions
we have adopted. It is difficult to assess if and to what extent such challenges, if raised, might impact our effective tax rate. On December
15, 2022, Council of the EU unanimously adopted the EU Directive on Global Minimum Tax. Subsequently, various EU member states enacted
the Pillar II mechanism such that it shall become effective by December 31, 2024 or after that date.
In line with the above-mentioned global developments
in international taxation, the state of Israel has recently enacted the Law for the Taxation of Multinational Enterprise Groups –
2025, entered into force as of January 1, 2026, implementing key aspects of the OECD’s Pillar II framework. In particular, the proposed
legislation introduces a domestic minimum top-up tax (Qualified Domestic Minimum Top-Up Tax, or QDMTT) generally applicable to Israeli
entities that are part of multinational enterprise groups with consolidated annual revenues of at least EUR 750 million, with the objective
of ensuring a minimum effective tax rate of 15% on profits attributable to activities in Israel and preventing the allocation of taxing
rights to foreign jurisdictions under the Income Inclusion Rule or the Undertaxed Profits Rule under the Pillar II framework.
It is noted that, the Israeli Ministry of Finance
has recently published a draft legislation as part of the 2026 Economic Plan, proposing a revised incentive regime for research and development
activities in Israel, structured primarily as refundable or credit-based tax incentives designed to qualify under the OECD’s “qualified”
incentive criteria in a Pillar II environment.
Changes in certain tax benefits under the Israeli
Capital Investment Encouragement Law may increase our ETR.
Starting 2017, we made an election to receive
Tax benefits under Israeli “Economic Efficiency Law” as a “Preferred Technological Enterprise”. While we believe
that we meet the statutory conditions to entitle us to such benefits there can be no assurance that the tax authorities in Israel will
concur to our position in general or with respect to certain portions of our income and may impact all or specific year (which are open
for an audit). Should it be determined that we have not, or do not meet such conditions, the benefits received would be cancelled. We
would also be required to pay increased taxes or refund any benefits previously received, adjusted to the Israeli consumer price index
and interest, or other monetary penalty.
For additional information regarding Approved
and Benefited Enterprise, Preferred Enterprise and Preferred Technological Enterprise see, “Item 10E. Taxation – Israeli Taxation”
in this Annual Report.
As noted above, the Israeli government may reduce
or eliminate the above-mentioned benefits in the future, inter-alia, in light of or as a response to the OECD or the “two Pillars”
initiatives. The termination or reduction of these grants or tax benefits could harm our financial condition and results of operations,
and result in significantly higher tax payment. In addition, if we increase our activities outside Israel due to, for example, future
acquisitions or outsourcing of manufacturing or development activities, these activities generally will not be eligible for inclusion
in Israeli grants or tax benefit programs. Accordingly, our effective corporate tax rate could increase significantly in the future.
We experience quarterly fluctuations in our operating
results, which may adversely impact our share price.
Our quarterly operating results within a specific
year can fluctuate significantly. A principal reason is that we derive a substantial portion of our revenue from the sale of a relatively
small number of systems to a relatively small number of customers. As a result, our revenues and results of operations for any given quarter
may decrease due to factors relating to the timing of orders, the timing of shipments of systems, and the timing of recognizing these
revenues. Furthermore, our quarterly results are affected by the cyclical nature of the semiconductor capital equipment market and industries.
We also have a limited ability to predict revenues
for future quarterly periods and, as a result, face risks of revenue shortfalls. If the number of systems we actually ship, and thus the
amount of revenues we are able to record in any particular quarter, is below our expectations, the adverse effect may be magnified by
our inability to adjust spending quickly enough to compensate for the revenue shortfall.
Some of our contracts and arrangements
potentially subject us to the risk of significant or non-limited liability.
We produce highly complex optical, mechanical
and electronic components and, accordingly, there is a risk that defects may occur in any of our products. Such defects can give rise
to significant costs, including expenses relating to recalling products, replacing defective items, writing down defective inventory and
loss of potential sales. In addition, the occurrence of such defects may give rise to product liability and warranty claims, including
liability for damages caused by such defects.
In our commercial relationship with customers,
we attempt to negotiate waivers of consequential and indirect damages arising from damages for loss of use, loss of product, loss of revenue
and loss of profit caused by our products. However, some contracts and arrangements we are bound by, expose us to product liability claims
resulting in personal injury or death, up to an unlimited amount, and the incurrence of the risk of material penalties for consequential
or liquidated damages. Additionally, under such contracts and arrangements, we may be named in product liability claims even if there
is no evidence that our products caused the damage in question, and such claims could result in significant costs and expenses relating
to attorneys’ fees and damages.
In addition, such contracts and arrangements may
include non-limited liability provisions for infringement of a third party’s intellectual property rights in connection with our
products.
Although we have not incurred in the past any
material penalties for consequential or liquidated damages, we may incur such penalties in the future. Such penalties for consequential
or liquidated damages may be significant (and so is the legal process conducted in connection with such penalties) and could negatively
affect our financial condition or results of operations.
A large number of our ordinary shares continue
to be owned by a relatively small number of shareholders, whose future sales of our shares, if substantial, may depress our share price.
If our principal shareholders sell substantial
amounts of our ordinary shares, including shares issued upon the exercise of outstanding options or warrants, the market price of our
ordinary shares may fall. For additional information on our major shareholders, see “Item 7A – Major Shareholders” in
this Annual Report.
Certain shareholders may control the outcome of
matters submitted to a vote of our shareholders, including the election of directors.
To the best of our knowledge, approximately 42%
of our outstanding ordinary shares are cumulatively held by six of our shareholders. As a result, and although we are currently not aware
of any voting agreement between such shareholders, if these shareholders voted together or in the same manner, they would have the ability
to control the outcome of corporate actions requiring an ordinary majority vote of shareholders as set in the Company’s Amended
and Restated Articles of Association. Even if these shareholders do not vote together, each one of them may have the ability to influence
the outcome of corporate actions requiring the vote of shareholders as set in the Company’s Amended and Restated Articles of Association. For
additional information on our major shareholders, see “Item 7A – Major Shareholders” in this Annual Report.
The market price of our ordinary shares may be
affected by a limited trading volume and may fluctuate significantly.
In the past, there has been a limited public market
for our ordinary shares and there can be no assurance that an active trading market for our ordinary shares will continue. An absence
of an active trading market could adversely affect our shareholders’ ability to sell our ordinary shares in short time periods.
Our ordinary shares have experienced, and are likely to experience in the future, significant price and volume fluctuations, which could
adversely affect the market price of our ordinary shares without regard to our operating performance. Financial forecasts and announcement
of major players in the industry may have an effect on our share price.
In addition, the price of our ordinary shares
could also be affected by possible sales of our ordinary shares by investors who view our convertible senior notes as a more attractive
means of equity participation in our company, and by hedging and arbitrage trading activity that such investors may engage in.
We manage our available cash through various bank
institutions and invest large portions of our cash reserves in bank deposits. The bankruptcy of one of the banks in which or through which
we hold or invest our cash reserves, might prevent us to access that cash for an uncertain period of time.
We manage our available cash through various bank
institutions and invest large portions of our cash reserves in bank deposits. As of December 31, 2025, a large portion of our cash reserves
were invested in bank institutions, of which approximately 22% (from total cash reserves and investment portfolio) was invested in one
bank institution in Israel. The bankruptcy of one of the bank institutions in which we hold our cash reserves or through which we invest
our cash reserves, might prevent us to access that cash for an uncertain period of time.
Our investment portfolio may be adversely affected
by market conditions and interest rates.
We maintain substantial balances of liquid investments,
for purposes of financing our operations and acquisitions. Our marketable securities totaled $907 million as of December 31, 2025. The
performance of the capital markets affects the values of funds that are held in marketable securities. These assets are subject to market
fluctuations and various developments, including, without limitation, rating agency downgrades that may impair their value. We generally
buy and hold our portfolio positions, while minimizing credit risk by setting limits for minimum credit rating and maximum concentration
per issuer. Our investments consist primarily of government and corporate debentures, which are primarily fixed-income securities.
Although we believe that we generally adhere to
conservative investment guidelines, the continuing turmoil in the financial markets may result in impairments of the carrying value of
our investment assets. In addition, as our investment portfolio is invested primarily in fixed-income securities it is affected by changes
in interest rates. Interest rates are highly sensitive to many factors, including governmental monetary policies and domestic and international
economic and political conditions. Any significant decline in our financial income or the value of our investments as a result of the
changes in interest rates and interest rate expectations of the financial markets, deterioration in the credit rating of the securities
in which we have invested, or general market conditions, could have an adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.
We classify our investments as available-for-sale. Changes in the fair value of investments classified as available-for-sale are not recognized
as income during the period, but rather are recognized as other comprehensive income, or OCI, which is a separate component of equity
until realized. Realized losses in our investments portfolio may adversely affect our financial position and results.
We may fail to maintain effective internal control
over financial reporting in accordance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 imposes certain
duties on us and our executives and directors. Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 requires (i) management’s annual review
and evaluation of our internal control over financial reporting and (ii) an attestation report issued by an independent registered public
accounting firm on our internal control over financial reporting, in connection with the filing of our Annual Report on Form 20-F for
each fiscal year. We have documented and tested our internal control systems and procedures in order for us to comply with the requirements
of Section 404. While our assessment of our internal control over financial reporting resulted in our conclusion that as of December 31,
2025, our internal control over financial reporting was effective, we cannot predict the outcome of our testing in future periods. If
we fail to maintain the adequacy of our internal controls, we may not be able to ensure that we can conclude on an ongoing basis that
we have effective internal controls over financial reporting. Failure to maintain effective internal control over financial reporting
could result in investigation or sanctions by regulatory authorities, and could have a material adverse effect on our operating results,
investor confidence in our reported financial information, and the market price of our ordinary shares.
We may face risks associated
with third-party distributors and agents, which could adversely affect our financial results or operations. |
Although most of our sales are direct, we use third-party distributors and agents in
some instances. The use of these distributors and agents exposes us to various risks, such as challenges in enforcing contracts, difficulties
in collecting accounts receivable, extended collection periods, and ensuring that our agents and distributors comply with applicable laws
including export control, sanctions, anti-corruption regulations, or with our business practices. If we are required to replace or terminate
an agent or distributor, we may experience delays, reduced market access, or other commercial disruptions. Such events could adversely
affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Provisions of our Amended and Restated Articles
of Association and Israeli law may delay, prevent or make difficult an acquisition of Nova, which could prevent a change of control and
negatively affect the price of our ordinary shares.
Israeli corporate law regulates mergers, requires
tender offers for acquisitions of shares above specified thresholds, for special approvals for transactions involving directors, officers
or significant shareholders and regulates other matters that may be relevant to these types of transactions. Furthermore, Israeli tax
considerations may make potential transactions unappealing to us or to some of our shareholders. See Exhibit 2.1 to this Annual Report
for a more detailed discussion regarding some anti-takeover effects of Israeli law.
These provisions of Israeli law may delay, prevent
or make difficult an acquisition of Nova, which could prevent a change of control and therefore depress the price of our shares.
The rights and responsibilities
of our shareholders are governed by Israeli law and differ in some respects from the rights and responsibilities of shareholders under
U.S. law.
We are incorporated under Israeli law. The rights
and responsibilities of holders of our ordinary shares are governed by our Amended and Restated Articles of Association and by the Israeli
Companies Law, 1999 (the “Companies Law”) and the regulations promulgated thereunder. These rights and responsibilities differ
in some respects from the rights and responsibilities of shareholders in typical U.S. corporations. In particular, pursuant to the Companies
Law each shareholder of an Israeli company has to act in good faith in exercising his or her rights and fulfilling his or her obligations
toward the company and other shareholders and to refrain from abusing his or her power in the company, including, among other things,
in voting at the general meeting of shareholders and class meetings, on amendments to a company’s articles of association, increases
in a company’s authorized share capital, mergers, and transactions requiring shareholders’ approval under the Companies Law.
In addition, a controlling shareholder of an Israeli company or a shareholder who knows that it possesses the power to determine the outcome
of a shareholder vote or who has the power to appoint or prevent the appointment of a director or officer in the company, or has other
powers toward the company, has a duty of fairness toward the company. However, Israeli law does not define the substance of this duty
of fairness. Because Israeli corporate law has undergone extensive revision in recent years, there is little case law available to assist
in understanding the implications of these provisions that govern shareholder behavior.
Any shareholder with a cause of action against
us as a result of buying, selling or holding our ordinary shares may have difficulty asserting a claim under U.S. securities laws or enforcing
a U.S. judgment against us or our officers, directors or Israeli auditors.
We are organized under the laws of the State of
Israel, and we maintain most of our operations in Israel. Most of our officers and directors as well as our Israeli auditors reside outside
of the United States and a substantial portion of our assets and the assets of these persons are located outside the United States. Therefore,
if you wish to enforce a judgment obtained in the United States against us, or our officers, directors and auditors, you will probably
have to file a claim in an Israeli court. Additionally, you might not be able to bring civil actions under U.S. securities laws if you
file a lawsuit in Israel. We have been advised by our Israeli counsel that Israeli courts generally enforce a final executory judgment
of a U.S. court for liquidated amounts in civil matters after a hearing in Israel. If a foreign judgment is enforced by an Israeli court,
it will be payable in Israeli currency. However, payment in the local currency of the country where the foreign judgment was given will
be acceptable, subject to applicable foreign currency restrictions.
Our shares are listed for trade on more than one
stock exchange, and this may result in price variations.
Our ordinary shares are listed for trading on
the Nasdaq Global Select Market and on the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange Ltd., or TASE. This may result in price variations. Our ordinary shares
are traded on these markets in different currencies, U.S. dollars on the Nasdaq Global Select Market and New Israeli Shekels on the TASE.
These markets have different opening times and close on different days. Different trading times and differences in exchange rates, among
other factors, may result in our shares being traded at a price differential on these two markets. In addition, market influences in one
market may influence the price at which our shares are traded on the other.
Our business could be negatively affected as a
result of actions of activist shareholders, and such activism could impact the trading value of our securities.
In recent years, certain Israeli issuers listed
on United States exchanges have been faced with governance-related demands from activist shareholders, as well as unsolicited tender offers
and proxy contests. Although as a foreign private issuer we are currently not subject to U.S. proxy rules, responding to these types of
actions by activist shareholders could be costly and time-consuming, disrupting our operations and diverting the attention of management
and our employees. Such activities could interfere with our ability to execute our strategic plan. In addition, a proxy contest for the
election of directors at our annual meeting would require us to incur significant legal fees and proxy solicitation expenses and require
significant time and attention by management and our board of directors. The perceived uncertainties due to these potential actions of
activist shareholders also could affect the market price and volatility of our securities.
We may be classified as a “passive foreign
investment company” for U.S. income tax purposes, which could have significant and adverse tax consequences to U.S. shareholders.
Generally, if for any taxable year 75% or more
of our gross income consists of specified types of passive income, or, on average, at least 50% of our assets are held for the production
of, or produce, passive income, we may be characterized as a passive foreign investment company (a “PFIC”) for U.S. federal
income tax purposes. Classification of Nova as a PFIC could result in adverse U.S. tax consequences to our U.S. shareholders, such as
ineligibility for any preferential tax rates on capital gains or on dividends, interest charges on certain taxes treated as deferred,
and additional reporting requirements under U.S. federal income tax laws and regulations. If we are a PFIC, it may be possible for U.S.
holders of our ordinary shares to mitigate certain of these consequences by making an election to treat us as a “qualified electing
fund” under Section 1295 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”) or a “mark-to-market election”
under Section 1296 of the Code. U.S. shareholders should consult with their own U.S. tax advisors with respect to the U.S. tax consequences
of investing in our ordinary shares.
We believe that for our 2025 taxable year we were
not a PFIC. Nonetheless, because the determination of whether we are, or will be, a PFIC for a taxable year depends on the application
of complex U.S. federal income tax rules, which are subject to various interpretations, there is a risk that we were a PFIC in 2025. Absent
one of the elections referenced above, if we are a PFIC for any taxable year during which a U.S. holder holds our ordinary shares, we
generally will continue to be treated as a PFIC with respect to such U.S. holder in all succeeding years regardless of whether we cease
to meet the PFIC tests in one or more subsequent years. Currently we expect that we will not be a PFIC in 2026 or subsequent years. However,
PFIC status is determined based on our assets and income over the course of each taxable year, and is dependent on a number of factors,
including the value of our assets, the trading price of our ordinary shares and the amount and type of our gross income. Therefore, there
can be no assurances that we will not become a PFIC for the 2026 taxable year, or any future year, or that the Internal Revenue Service
(“IRS”) will not challenge any determination made by us concerning our PFIC status. For a discussion on how we might be characterized
as a PFIC and related tax consequences, please see the section of this Annual Report entitled “Taxation - U.S. Taxation –
Passive Foreign Investment Companies.” Investors should consult their own tax advisors regarding all aspects of the application
of the PFIC rules to our ordinary shares.
As a foreign private issuer, we are subject to
reporting and corporate governance requirements that differ from those applicable to U.S. domestic companies, and the loss of this status
could result in significant additional costs and expenses.
We currently qualify as a foreign private issuer
and report under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), as a non-U.S. company. As a result
of our foreign private issuer status, our shareholders are subject to different risks and may not receive the same protections afforded
to shareholders of U.S. domestic public companies. In particular, we are exempt from, or subject to less stringent and less frequent,
certain Exchange Act reporting and disclosure requirements applicable to U.S. domestic issuers, including U.S. proxy rules, short-swing
profit liability under Section 16 of the Exchange Act, and the requirement to file quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, although we intend
to furnish quarterly information on Form 6-K; however, following a recent amendment to Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act, our directors
and certain officers (as such term is defined under Rule 16a-1(f) of the Exchange Act) will no longer be exempt from the reporting requirements
under Section 16(a), effective March 18, 2026. We are also not subject to the requirements of Regulation FD (Fair Disclosure) promulgated
under the Exchange Act, which generally requires U.S. domestic companies to disclose material information to all investors simultaneously,
although we voluntary comply with these rules. In addition, foreign private issuers are permitted a longer period to file annual reports
on Form 20-F than U.S. domestic issuers filing on Form 10-K. As a foreign private issuer that follows certain home country corporate governance
practices, we may also rely on exemptions from certain Nasdaq corporate governance requirements, which could result in our shareholders
not having the same protection as shareholders of companies subject to all Nasdaq corporate governance rules.
We may, however, lose our foreign private
issuer status in the future, which could result in significant additional costs and expenses. The determination of foreign private issuer
status is made annually on the last business day of an issuer’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, and accordingly,
we will re-evaluate our qualification as a foreign private issuer on June 30, 2026. In June 2025, the SEC issued a concept release soliciting
public comment on potential changes to the definition of a foreign private issuer. This release is the first review of the foreign private
issuer framework since 2008, and the SEC is considering revisions that could significantly impact which foreign companies qualify for
the more-relaxed U.S. reporting requirements afforded to foreign private issuers. The concept release outlines several potential approaches
to revising the foreign private issuer definition, including updating existing eligibility criteria, adding foreign trading volume requirements,
and incorporating an assessment of foreign regulation. If we no longer qualify as a foreign private issuer, whether due to revisions in
the definition of a foreign private issuer or for any other reason, we will be required to file with the SEC periodic reports and registration
statements on U.S. domestic issuer forms, which are more detailed and extensive than the forms available to a foreign private issuer.
We will also have to comply with U.S. federal proxy rules, and our officers, directors and principal shareholders will become subject
to the short-swing profit disclosure and recovery provisions of Section 16 of the Exchange Act. In addition, we will lose our ability
to rely upon exemptions from certain corporate governance rules of Nasdaq. If this were to occur, we would incur significant additional
legal, accounting, and other expenses.
Item 4. Information
on the Company
4.A History and
Development of the Company
Nova Ltd. was incorporated in May 1993 under the
laws of the State of Israel. We commenced operations in October 1993 to design, develop and produce integrated process control systems
for use in the manufacture of semiconductors, also known as integrated circuits or chips.
In April 2000, we conducted an initial public
offering and our shares were listed for trading on the Nasdaq Stock Exchange.
In June 2002, we listed our shares on the TASE,
pursuant to legislation which enables Israeli companies whose shares are traded on certain stock exchanges outside of Israel to be registered
on the TASE, while reporting, in substance, in accordance with the provision of the relevant foreign securities law applicable to the
Company.
Until 2008, most of our products were sold to
PEMs such as Applied Materials, Inc. and Ebara Corp., which later sold these products to semiconductor manufacturers. Since then, we have
changed our business model, selling substantially all of our products directly to semiconductor manufacturers. Through this process, which
has also enabled us to introduce to these customers additional products and features, we have improved our products gross margins and
net profitability.
In April 2015, we acquired ReVera Inc., a privately
held company headquartered in Santa Clara, California, which develops, manufactures and sells stand-alone metrology tools for measurements
of thin-films and composition applications in the semiconductor industry, and on December 31, 2017, we merged ReVera into its parent company,
Nova Measuring Instruments, Inc.
On July 25, 2021, we changed the legal name of
the Company from Nova Measuring Instruments Ltd. to Nova Ltd. to match the Company’s
long-term strategy. The Company retained its NVMI ticker symbol and its Process Insight® tagline.
In January 2022, we acquired ancosys GmbH, a privately
held company with headquarters in Pliezhausen, Germany which is a leading provider of chemical analysis and metrology solutions for advanced
semiconductor manufacturing, supporting both frontend and backend semiconductor manufacturing. On June 26, 2023, ancosys GmbH merged into
its parent company, Nova Measuring Instruments GmbH.
In January 2025, we acquired Sentronics Metrology
GmbH, a privately held company with headquarters in Mannheim, Germany which is a global provider of wafer metrology tools for the backend
semiconductor fabrication. The addition of Sentronics’ modular dimensional metrology technology to Nova’s dimensional metrology
portfolio will enable Nova to diversify its offering in the growing field of advanced wafer level packaging and specialty devices.
At the end of 2025, we had seven direct fully
owned subsidiaries, in the U.S., Taiwan, Korea, China, Japan, Singapore and Germany and a wholly owned subsidiary of Nova Measuring Instruments
GmbH.
Our headquarter office is located in Israel at
5 David Fikes St., 10th Floor, Rehovot.
Our website address is www.novami.com,
and our telephone number is +972-73-229-5600. We use our website as a means of disclosing material non-public information. Such disclosures
will be included on our website in the “Investors” sections. Accordingly, investors should monitor such sections of our website,
in addition to following our press releases and SEC filings. Information contained on, or that can be accessed through, our website does
not constitute a part of this Annual Report and is not incorporated by reference herein. We have included our website address in this
Annual Report solely for informational purposes. Our SEC filings are available to you on the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov.
This site contains reports and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC. The information on that website
is not part of this Annual Report and is not incorporated by reference herein.
Our agent for service of process in the United
States is Nova Measuring Instruments Inc., which maintains its principal offices at 3342 Gateway Blvd, Fremont, CA 94538. Its telephone
number is 1-408-510-7400.
4.B
Business Overview
Our Company
Nova is a leading innovator and key provider of
metrology solutions for advanced process control used in semiconductor manufacturing. Nova delivers continuous innovation by providing
high-performance metrology solutions for effective process control throughout the semiconductor fabrication process. We bring pioneering
metrology solutions to semiconductors process control, by industrializing lab and research-grade technologies and developing emerging
metrology solutions. Nova’s product portfolio, deployed at the world’s largest integrated-circuit manufacturers, combines
high-precision hardware and cutting-edge software, and provides its customers with deep insight into the development and production of
the most advanced semiconductor devices. Nova’s capability to deliver innovative Optical, X-ray, SIMS and Chemical analysis technology
solutions enables its customers to improve performance, enhance product yields and accelerate time to market.
Nova delivers a comprehensive suite of metrology
solutions spanning optical, materials, and chemical technologies. These technology areas collectively support both dimensional and materials
characterization, as well as chemical process control, enabling advanced process insight across semiconductor manufacturing.
In January 2025, through the acquisition of Sentronics,
we expanded our optical technology base to wafer metrology tools for backend semiconductor fabrication. The addition of Sentronics’
modular dimensional metrology technology to Nova’s dimensional metrology portfolio is meant to enable Nova to enter the growing
field of advanced wafer level packaging and specialty devices.
The corporate units, such as marketing, next generation
technology, human resources, finance and global business group, support all divisions.
Our Market
Semiconductor Industry and the Metrology Market
The semiconductor manufacturing process is divided
into front-end and back-end. The front-end process starts with a flat silicon disc known as a silicon wafer upon which integrated circuits
are constructed. To construct the integrated circuits, a series of layers of thin films that act as conductors, semiconductors or insulators
are applied. During the manufacturing process, these film layers are subjected to processes which remove and add portions of the film,
create circuit patterns and perform other functions. The back-end process, known as packaging, begins after the integrated circuits are
completed on the wafer. The wafer is diced into individual chips, which are then mounted on a substrate and connected to external leads
through techniques such as wire bonding or flip-chip. Recently introduced advanced packaging technologies incorporate processes such as
hybrid bonding for high-density interconnects, chiplet integration for modular design flexibility, and 3D chip stacking to achieve greater
performance and bandwidth in a smaller footprint. Finally, the chips are encapsulated to protect them from physical damage and environmental
factors, while ensuring efficient heat dissipation and electrical performance before final testing and shipment.
The semiconductor manufacturing process requires
numerous precise steps and strict control of equipment performance and process sequences. Tight process control can be achieved through
monitoring silicon wafers and measuring relevant parameters before, during or after each process step, with metrology tools.
The demand for our metrology systems is driven
by capital equipment spending of the semiconductor manufacturers, which is in turn driven by the worldwide demand for semiconductor components
embedded in technology devices. Industry data indicates worldwide demand for semiconductors will continue to grow, driven by the growing
adoption of AI, networks and data centers constructed to support the influx of data, and additional growth engines such as internet of
things (“IoT”) applications, advanced network infrastructure, automotive, and green energy solutions.
The growing investment in advanced technology
nodes introduces growing complexity and new challenges into the semiconductor manufacturing process, as manufacturers are continuously
pushed to improve performance and cost to gain competitive advantage. In a climate of constant growth, suppliers and manufacturers are
asked to constantly come up with new products with greater functionality, lower power consumption, faster connectivity and better performance
at lower prices. As a result, many new complex materials, advanced structures, packaging schemes and processes are being introduced into
the semiconductor manufacturing ecosystem. An environment of growing complexity in chip design and manufacturing set favorable business
conditions for process control demand.
Over the past several years we have seen growing
demand for trailing node capacity, driven by the growing need for IoT and sensors that do not require leading edge technologies. This
trend is expected to continue in coming years and to increase the demand for metrology and process control solutions.
In addition, we are seeing a rapid growth in investments
in advanced packaging production lines, driven by the heightened need for high-performance, high-intensity devices to support the increase
in computing power required by AI-related applications. New architectures are emerging in the advanced packaging space, designed to enable
a swift leap in performance rather than wait for the next generation of chip architecture.
The Semiconductor Manufacturing Process
Semiconductors devices typically consist of transistors,
memory cells or other components connected by an intricate system of circuitry on silicon wafers. Integrated circuit manufacturing involves
many individual steps, some of which are repeated several times, through which numerous copies of an integrated circuit are formed on
a single silicon wafer. Because semiconductor specifications are extremely tight, and integrated circuits are becoming more complex, the
process steps are constantly monitored, and critical parameters are measured at each step using metrology equipment. Key process steps,
such as Deposition, Photolithography, Etch, ion implementation, Electro-Chemical Plating, and Chemical-Mechanical Planarization, rely
on metrology systems to monitor film thickness, uniformity, critical dimensions, material and chemical characteristics to ensure the correct
result has been achieved.
The measurements taken by metrology systems during
the manufacturing process help ensure process uniformity and help semiconductor manufacturers avoid costly rework and misprocessing, therefore
increasing efficiency, yield and time to market.
The Need for Effective Process Control and Metrology
Tools
Several technical and operational trends within
the semiconductor manufacturing industry are strengthening the need for more effective process control and metrology solutions. These
trends include:
|
• |
Smaller IC Devices. The development of advanced smaller
features means a larger numbers of integrated circuits per wafer. As feature geometries decrease, the manufacturing process tolerances
decreases as well, and manufacturing yield becomes increasingly sensitive to processing deviations and defects. In addition, the increased
complexity means higher chance of error during manufacturing, leading to additional inline monitoring and metrology steps. |
|
• |
Transition to 3D Devices. The transition to ever more complex
3D Integration technology, in order to improve performance, requires complex fabrication and as a result more sophisticated metrology
solutions to be capable of measuring critical dimensions and materials properties in these 3D structures. |
|
• |
Faster Time to Market. The accelerating rate of obsolescence
of technology and the faster ramp to yield required by customers makes early achievement of high manufacturing yields a critical component
of profitability and metrology has a critical role in achieving these demanding results. |
|
• |
Materials Engineering. In order to overcome limitations
in the continued shrink of transistor dimensions, which are used to improve performance, leading manufacturers are introducing new novel
materials to IC production. Introduction of new materials requires new processing and metrology solutions in the atom level and thus represents
a challenging development for the semiconductor manufacturing industry. It also represents a growing demand for tighter materials control
and therefore increasing demand for Materials Metrology solutions to control parameters such as composition, stress, ultra-thickness,
crystallization and more. |
|
• |
Chemical Process Control. The strive for high yields
in new and complex IC devices and advanced packaging architectures, growing costs of materials and chemicals, and tighter sustainability
and environmental regulations are driving up the costs of operations and increasing the need for manufacturers to carry out chemical process
control on more elements and with increasing intensity. |
|
• |
New Manufacturing Steps. Multiple Lithography technologies
including multi-patterning and E-Beam are increasing the number of Etch and CMP process steps and EUV poses unique metrology challenges. |
|
• |
Foundry Model. The rising investment needed for leading
edge semiconductor process development and production, as well as the proliferation of different types of devices, lead to manufacturing
increasingly being outsourced to foundries. A foundry typically runs several different processes and makes numerous different semiconductor
product types in one facility. Since Foundries are running multiple products at the same time, the need for process control and metrology
is increasing in order to qualify multiple devices on the same wafer at the same high process quality. |
|
|
• |
Advanced Memory Technology (SSD). Memory manufacturers are going through technology evolution and build vertical
devices to manage layers of NAND Memory (3D NAND). Such a complex device that can hold up to hundreds of thin high aspect ratio vertical
layers requires significant changes in the manufacturing process. These changes require also many more steps to control through different
Metrology solutions and increase the overall process control intensity for these High Aspect Ratio evolving structures. |
| |
• |
DRAM and High Bandwidth Memory (HBM). The transition to advanced memory architectures such as DDR5 and HBM
introduces significant complexity in design and manufacturing. These technologies require extremely fine geometries, ultra-thin layers,
and precise alignment of multiple dies to achieve high bandwidth and low latency. Stacking memory dies in HBM and integrating them with
logic through through-silicon vias (TSVs) and hybrid bonding dramatically increases process steps and tightens tolerances. This evolution
introduced new metrology challenges, including accurate measurement of TSV depth, bonding quality, and layer-to-layer alignment and more.
As these architectures scale for AI, HPC, and data center applications, process control intensity rises sharply, expanding the need for
advanced metrology solutions to ensure reliability and performance. |
| |
• |
Advanced Packaging. The evolution in packaging to high-end performance packaging technologies such as flip
chip, fan out, 2.5D and 3D packaging as well as hybrid bonding, is driven by the need for enhanced performance with higher I/O density,
smaller pitch and a growing variety of complex packaging schemes. The advanced packaging business growth is propelled by AI and HPC-related
applications. Capital investment for High-End Performance Packaging represents a significant part of the total packaging CAPEX and is
shifting from OSATs to Integrated Device Manufacturers and Foundries as the production and process control requirements are becoming similar
to Front-End Fabs. These trends expand the TAM for process control and metrology solutions and Nova has a set of solutions targeting this
growing market. |
In order to address the continuous increasing
costs and challenges associated with these trends, semiconductor manufacturers must improve manufacturing procedures, production yields
and time to market. Beyond improving the technology, introducing new process steps and innovative fabrication capabilities, Semiconductors
manufacturers must tighten the control over the process and therefore must increase the Metrology intensity as well as introduce new innovative
Metrology solutions. These new solutions will allow manufactures to overcome new challenges in dimensions, materials and chemical engineering.
The Semiconductor Market – Update
According to Gartner forecasts, semiconductor
revenues are expected to grow by 33% in 2026, following a growth of 21% in 2025. WFE (Wafer Fab Equipment) is expected to grow by 12%
in 2026, following a growth of 11% in 2025 (Gartner Forecast Semiconductor Wafer Fab Equipment, Worldwide, Q425 Update, published December
2025).
According to research reports, future demand drivers
for semiconductors include AI, smart sensors, internet-of-things industrial devices, green energy, automotive, data center and cloud infrastructure,
and other electronic equipment.
Products
& Technologies
Our product portfolio includes a complete set
of metrology platforms suited for dimensional, films, materials and chemical metrology measurements for process control across multiple
semiconductor manufacturing process steps including lithography, Etch, CMP, deposition, electrochemical plating, ion implementation and
advanced packaging. Our offering is comprised of several key product lines, spanning multiple technologies and addressing key challenges
in semiconductor process control, from R&D to High-Volume-Manufacturing.
Our strategy to offer holistic and diversified
portfolio supports the industry’s frequent transitions, establishing the advantages and unique value we bring to our customers.
With the introduction of new technologies and products, we cover a wider variety of applications, which increase our served and available
markets and footprint in the semiconductor manufacturing market.
|
Technology |
Product Line |
Key applications |
Product families |
|
• Broadband Spectrophotometry
• Scatterometry
• Spectral Reflectometry
• Imaging and Image Processing |
Dimensional Optical CD Integrated Metrology |
Critical Dimensions
Thin films
Wafer topography
|
Nova i Platform |
|
Dimensional Optical CD Stand-Alone Metrology |
Nova T-platform
Nova MMSR
Nova VeloCD |
|
• Spectral Interferometry |
Nova Prism |
|
• Spectral
Coherence Interferometry
• Spectral
Reflectometry
• White
Light Interferometry |
Film/wafers Thickness
Wafer Topography
Roughness
Critical dimensions |
Nova SemDex |
|
Nova WMC |
|
• X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy
• X-Ray Fluorescence |
X-Ray
Materials
Metrology |
Thin film
Composition
|
Nova VeraFlex |
|
• Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry |
SIMS Materials
Metrology |
Composition depth-profiling |
Nova Metrion |
|
• Raman Spectroscopy |
Optical Materials Metrology |
Strain
Crystallinity
Composition
Strength/Stress
|
Nova Elipson |
|
• Titration – various types
• CVS, CPVS, PCGA
• Spectrophotometry
• HPLC
• Dynamic Surface Tension
• pH, conductivity, density |
Chemical Process Control – Analysis and Replenishment |
Electroplating process applications in interconnect, advanced packaging |
Nova Ancolyzer
Nova AncoScene |
|
• Solid dosing
|
Metal Replenishment
|
Powder dosing specialty metal oxide materials for electroplating applications |
Nova DMR |
|
• Computational Modeling for Metrology Platforms |
Physical modeling (Modeling Software Solutions), Mathematical modeling algorithms (Software
solutions), and a combination of the two. |
|
Nova MARS |
|
• AI adjacent and Machine Learning
• Advanced Algorithms |
|
Nova FIT for Films CD Metrology
Nova FIT for Material Metrology |
|
• Big Data Analytics
• High Power Computing |
Fleet Management (Software solutions) |
|
Nova FM
Nova HPC
QED |
Following the acquisition of Sentronics in January
2025, we expanded our technology offering. Sentronics develops flexible and modular metrology tools equipped with multiple metrology sensors
for a variety of critical dimension applications, including thickness, roughness, and topography. The addition of Sentronics’
modular dimensional metrology technology to Nova’s dimensional metrology portfolio will enable Nova to diversify its offering in
the growing field of advanced wafer level packaging and specialty devices.
About the product lines
Our product portfolio is composed of 4 major
metrology categories:
Integrated, Standalone (dimensional and materials),
Chemical and Software.
1. Dimensional
Integrated Metrology
Nova’s integrated
metrology (IM) - Integrated platforms that enable advanced process control (APC) required for the most advanced logic and memory
technology nodes. Nova’s IM market portfolio offers fast metrology with high productivity, targeting manufacturing of advanced logic,
advanced memory and advanced packaging technologies. Integrated metrology systems are directly integrated with manufacturing process equipment
and provide semiconductor manufacturers with effective and efficient process control by measuring wafers within the process environment.
This family of products allows wafer to wafer, within-wafer and within-die variation control. Enriched with Nova’s advanced modeling,
machine learning and algorithmic solutions, Nova’s integrated metrology provides enhancements in metrology accuracy, precision,
and tool matching.
2.1-Dimensional Standalone Metrology
Nova’s stand-alone
metrology portfolio is comprised of multiple product lines utilized to characterize critical dimensions such as width, shape and
profile with high precision and accuracy. The expression “stand-alone metrology” generically describes free standing metrology
equipment, located in line, i.e., next to the processing equipment measuring wafer samples in a station of its own.
Nova’s stand-alone platforms are targeted
for critical dimensions (CD), topography, thin-film, roughness and film thickness measurements at the most advanced process steps in logic,
memory and advanced packaging technology nodes including backend wafer-level packaging, TSV, PCB and IC-Substrate. Nova’s unique
channels of information enables high metrology performance combined with high productivity. When incorporating Nova’s advanced suites
of software, modeling and machine learning solutions, the Optical CD stand-alone platforms provide cutting-edge performance for the most
complex layer stacks and 3D structures.
Nova
Prism utilizes a combination of the exclusive SI technology with advanced modeling and machine-learning
capabilities, and to reveal unique information and address complex challenges in optical critical dimensions.
Nova
WMC is designed to support 2.5D and 3D Advanced Packaging processes. Through the highly versatile
modularity of its advanced metrology, handling, and loading systems.
The full stand alone portfolio also includes
the Nova VeloCD, Nova MMSR, Nova SemDex and the Nova T-series.
2.2 Materials Standalone metrology
Materials are considered the next frontier in
advancing integrated circuits beyond dimensional and architectural scaling. The growing usage of complex and novel materials has increased
the demand for metrology solutions that measure materials properties, In Line and In Die, and to precisely characterize and control materials
composition, thickness, stress and more. Nova’s materials metrology portfolio utilizes powerful technologies and includes three
platforms:
Nova’s VeraFlex
combines enhanced XPS (X-Ray photoelectron spectroscopy) capability with an optional unique low energy XRF (X-Ray fluorescence) channel
to determine the elemental composition and thickness of thin films.
Nova Metrion targets
process control of 3D logic and memory semiconductor devices and by applying inline SIMS enables advanced materials profile measurements
including depth profiling of compositional information
Nova Elipson
utilizes Raman spectroscopy, a vibrational technique, to detect multiple material properties such as strain, crystallinity, phase, grain
size and composition.
As part of Nova’s strategic plan, the Company
intends to increase its focus on the evolving materials engineering market.
3. Chemical Metrology
Nova offers a market-leading portfolio of advanced,
open and flexible chemical metrology platforms for backend wafer-level packaging, TSV, front-end dual-damascene, and PCB and IC-Substrate
process steps. Our portfolio is intended to help manufacturers ensure high-quality electroplating processes by carrying out chemical analysis
and replenishment in real time.
The growing number of interconnect steps that
require plating at the front-end of the process as well as the substantial increase in the number of organic alloys and compounds used
in advanced packaging are driving the need for advanced chemical metrology solutions. Furthermore, higher material costs, and tighter
environmental regulations are driving up the cost of operations and increasing the need to perform chemical process control on more elements
and with increasing intensity.
| |
• |
Nova AncoScene – a platform for damascene copper and cobalt
plating interconnects applications offering a fully automated analysis of bath components, overall plating performance, excursions, trends
alarms and warnings, and overall process control. |
| |
• |
Nova Ancolyzer –a fully automated online platform for advanced
packaging processes, that supports a wide variety of analytical techniques and is configured to specific process analysis and replenishment
requirements. |
| |
• |
Nova DMR offers economical replenishment of metals in a plating bath
to significantly extend the bath chemicals’ lifetime and improve the plater utilization. The solution additionally enables manufacturers
to reduce the use of hazardous materials, and in turn, aims to enable better compliance with environmental regulations. The platform integrates
with Nova Ancolyzer and can connect directly to any process tool. |
4. Modeling and Software
Nova’s platforms are combined with suites
of advanced algorithms and software modeling solutions that combine top notch algorithms in the field of AI and machine learning.
|
• |
Dimensional metrology: Nova’s suite of software modeling products is comprised of Nova MARS physical
and geometrical modeling and the Nova FIT, machine learning and modeling solutions. These solutions are supported by Nova HPC, a computational
management layer, which also serves as the foundation for Nova’s Centralized Fleet Management and Control. This comprehensive software
modeling portfolio provides customers with a complete modeling and application development solution designed for complex 3D and HAR structures
in the most advanced logic, memory and packaging technology nodes: |
|
• |
Materials Metrology: Nova FIT acts as a server-based solution, when used in conjunction with the Nova VeraFlex,
to enable higher measurement throughput and higher precision for certain use cases. |
Our Customers, Sales and Marketing
Our sales and marketing strategy is based mostly
on direct sales channels where we engage with our customers from the early stages of process development, to address their challenges
in the development phase, and later on support their technology transition to high volume production. We seek to establish and maintain
tight cooperative relationships with our customers by consistently providing them with a high level of service, support and new capabilities.
We have a global network of sales and marketing, customer service and applications support offices worldwide. Our teams are empowered
by frequent trainings, remote support options, online resources and rich marketing collateral.
We serve all leading manufacturers in the logic,
foundry, memory and packaging sectors of the integrated circuit manufacturing industry. Our customers are located across Asia, Europe
and North America.
For the distribution of our total revenues, from
products and services, by geographic areas, see Note 16B to our consolidated financial statements.
The semiconductor industry is characterized by
a growing consolidation of larger companies. As a result, a significant portion of our sales are concentrated among a relatively small
number of customers. The following table indicates the percentage of our total revenues derived from sales to our five largest customers
and the range of these revenues from these customers for the periods indicated.
|
|
|
2023 |
|
|
2024 |
|
|
2025 |
|
|
Total revenues from five largest customers |
|
|
52 |
% |
|
|
53 |
% |
|
|
51 |
% |
|
Range of revenues from five largest customers |
|
|
5-19 |
% |
|
|
6-18 |
% |
|
|
6-23 |
% |
Competition
The industries in which Nova operates are highly
competitive and characterized by rapid technological change. Nova’s ability to compete generally depends on its ability to develop
and introduce competitive solutions, commercialize its technology in a timely manner, continuously improve its products, and develop new
products that meet the evolving customer requirements. Significant competitive factors include technical capability and differentiation,
productivity, cost-effectiveness and the ability to support a global customer base. The importance of these factors varies according to
customers’ needs, including product mix and respective product requirements, applications, and the timing and circumstances of purchasing
decisions. Substantial competition exists in all areas of Nova’s business.
Competitors range from small companies that compete
in a single region, which may benefit from policies and regulations that favor domestic companies, to global, diversified companies. Nova’s
ability to compete requires a high level of investment in R&D, marketing and sales, and global customer support activities.
Research and Development
We have assembled a core team of experienced scientists
and engineers who are highly skilled in their particular field or discipline. Our research and development core competencies, technologies
and disciplines are in scatterometry, thin film metrology, XPS, interferometry, Raman Spectroscopy metrology, SIMS metrology, chemical
metrology techniques and semiconductor process control, and include multidisciplinary measurement instruments, complex system engineering,
algorithms, physical modeling, optical design, interpretation software, machine learning, image acquisition, pattern recognition, X-ray
energy sources, electron optics and detection, multiple types of electrochemical, and spectroscopic analysis methods, applied to characterize
individual and complex multi-component mixes, vacuum systems and equipment integration. Our research and development staff consists of
about 682 highly skilled members, approximately 163 of whom hold Ph.D.’s. In addition, we rely on independent subcontractors and
consultants in various fields. Since June 2003, our research and development operations in Israel are certified for ISO 9001 quality
standard (Current ISO 9001:2015 version), additionally certified in Germany and the U.S. as of 2020 and 2021, respectively.
The metrology and process control market is characterized
by continuous technological development and product innovations. We believe that the rapid and ongoing development of new products and
enhancements to our existing product lines is critical to our success. Accordingly, we devote a significant portion of our technical,
management and financial resources to developing innovative products, new applications and emerging innovative technologies.
Our vision is to continue to be an innovative
leader in the semiconductor process control market, through increasing our leadership in the Dimensional, Materials and Chemical metrology
solutions.
Our research and development efforts, designed
to support this vision, are structured through different and separate development projects, which are initiated following a detailed project
plan, marketing justification, technical feasibility, and risk analysis. The main projects are monitored throughout their life cycle in
a structured process, including design reviews and project management reviews.
In the frame of our research and development activities
we participate from time to time in development consortia arrangements, which also help us to support our customers in the transition
to advance technology nodes. These consortia are joint collaboration programs with other semiconductors companies and are supported and
funded by the IIA and/or European Joint Research and/or the German BMBF. It should be noted, that in order to maintain our eligibility
for these programs, we must continue to meet certain conditions. These programs might restrict our ability to manufacture particular products
and transfer particular technology, which were funded by the IIA or BMBF. For additional information, see “Item 5C - Grants from
the Israel Innovation Authority & European programs” in this Annual Report.
As part of our long-term technological collaboration,
we are also engaged with joint development activities with some of our strategic vendors or customers, as well as with research institutes
and other semiconductor companies. These activities sometimes impose limitations on the joint intellectual property developed as part
of these programs.
Patents and Other Proprietary Rights
Our continued success depends upon our ability
to protect our core technology and intellectual property. We therefore have an extensive program devoting resources to seeking patent
protection for our inventions and discoveries that we believe will provide us with competitive advantages. Our patents and applications
principally cover various aspects of optical measurement systems and methods, integrated process control implementation concepts, and
optical, opto-mechanical and mechanical design. In addition, our patents and applications cover various aspects of X-ray based measurement
systems and methods, including process control implementation concepts, X-ray energy sources, electron optics and detection, vacuum systems
and equipment integration. Our patents and applications portfolio also include aspects of Chemical metrology. To protect our proprietary
rights, we also rely on a combination of copyrights, trademarks, trade secret laws, contractual provisions (e.g. confidentiality agreements)
and licenses. Our copyrights include software copyrights. We constantly seek to control access to, and distribution of our proprietary
information, such as our proprietary algorithms. We enter into confidentiality and proprietary rights agreements with our employees, consultants
and business partners, and we control access to and distribution of our proprietary information.
Our in-house know-how is an important
element of our intellectual property. The development and management of our products require sophisticated coordination among many specialized
employees. We believe that duplication of this coordination by competitors or individuals seeking to copy our products would be difficult.
The risk of a competitor effectively replicating the functionality of our products is further mitigated by the fact that most of the core
technology operating on our systems is not exposed to a user or to our competitors. To protect our technology, we implement multiple layers
of security.
Despite our efforts to protect our proprietary
rights, competitors may be able to develop similar technology independently or design around our patents and, despite our efforts, our
trade secrets may be disclosed to others. Furthermore, the laws of countries other than the U.S. may not protect our intellectual property
to the same extent as the laws in the U.S. We also cannot assure that: (i) our pending patent applications will be approved; (ii) any
patents granted will be broad enough to protect our technology or provide us with competitive advantages or will not be successfully challenged
or invalidated by third parties; or (iii) that the patents of others will not have an adverse effect on our ability to do business. We
may also have to commence legal proceedings against third parties to protect our intellectual property.
From time to time, we receive communications
from others asserting that our products infringe or may infringe their intellectual property rights. Typically, our in-house patent counsel
investigates these matters and, where appropriate, retains outside counsel to provide assistance. We are not presently involved in any
material legal proceedings in which a third party has asserted that we have violated their intellectual property rights. If,
however, we become involved in any such litigation and its outcome is adverse to us, it may result in a loss of proprietary rights, subject
us to significant liabilities, including triple damages in some instances, require us to seek licenses from third parties which may not
be available on reasonable terms or at all, or prevent us from selling our products. Furthermore, any litigation relating to intellectual
property, even if we are ultimately successful, could result in substantial costs and diversion of time and effort by our management.
This in and of itself could have a negative impact on us. While we believe that we would be successful in any litigation seeking to enforce
our patent rights, the ultimate outcome of any litigation or other legal proceedings cannot be predicted.
Manufacturing
We have two manufacturing facilities for our Optical
based product lines (including the Raman technology), which are located in Rehovot and Nes Ziona, Israel, one manufacturing facility for
our X-ray and SIMS based product lines, which is located in Fremont, CA, U.S., one main manufacturing facility for our Chemical Analysis
and Metrology technology related product lines, which is located in Bad Urach, Germany and one manufacturing facility for our Optical
Metrology technology for Advanced Packaging product lines, which is located in Mannheim, Germany.
In 2025, we expanded our production and development
capabilities with a new manufacturing facility in Mannheim, Germany, that supports the Company’s newly introduced technologies and
continuous growth.
During the first half of 2026, we expect to complete
the expansion of our cleanroom in Fremont, CA, U.S., doubling the amount of production bays.
Our principal manufacturing activities include
assembly, integration, final testing and calibration. Our production activities are conducted in our manufacturing and repair center facilities
in Israel, Germany and in California. We rely and expect to continue to rely on subcontractors and contract manufacturing suppliers to
fabricate components, build subassemblies and perform other non-core activities in a cost-effective manner. While we use standard components
and subassemblies wherever possible, most mechanical parts, metal fabrications, optical components and other critical components used
in our products are engineered and manufactured to our specifications. A small portion of these components and subassemblies are obtained
from a limited group of suppliers, and occasionally from a single or sole source supplier.
In order to leverage the relatively high volume
of systems we manufacture, and in order to decrease production costs, we continue to focus our internal manufacturing activities on processes
that add significant value or require unique technology or specialized knowledge and outsource others. Our sites, in Israel, Fremont,
CA, Bad Urach, Germany, and Mannheim, Germany are certified by the ISO 9001:2015 quality mark by an international certification institute.
Additionally, we received the formal certification of ISO 14001 and ISO 45001 for our sites in Israel, Fremont, CA and Bad Urach, Germany
each of which are being annually recertified for these standards.
Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG)
Nova Sustainability 2025 Status
On April 28, 2025, we published our second Sustainability
Insight Review, as was published on our website (the “Sustainability Plan”). We aim
to continue improving our Sustainability Plan, which we plan to review and update every two years. Our focus remains on the wellbeing
of our employees and their families.
As part of the Sustainability Plan, we established
a management level ESG Steering Committee, led by our CEO, which oversees the ESG policies, strategy and implementation to monitor our
long-term and annual guidelines and results related to ESG matters. This committee serves as a supplement to the responsibilities of our
Chief Human Resources Officer, which among other matters, is responsible for developing strategies and initiatives to achieve our ESG
goals as detailed in our Sustainability Plan. All as part of our vision to become a more active influencer in creating a sustainable and
equitable future to grow Nova’s presence in Israel and abroad. Our Sustainability Plan was composed in accordance with the Global
Reporting Initiative (GRI), the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB) guidelines, and the United Nations Sustainable Development
Goals (SDGs). It is built on four pillars that we aim to interlace across our daily operations and culture: (i) Governance – elevating
ethical and corporate governance methods; (ii) People and Social Impact – with a focus on both the individual and the surrounding
communities; (iii) Innovative Approach – connecting technical roadmap to unique culture for long-term impact; and (iv) Environment
and Supply Chain – managing efficiently footprint, energy and sustainable supply chain.
For more information
on our Sustainability Plan – please visit our website where you can access the full report. Information
contained on, or that can be accessed through, our website does not constitute a part of this Annual Report and is not incorporated by
reference herein.
Capital Expenditures
Our capital expenditures are primarily for network
infrastructure, computer hardware and software, construction and leasehold improvements of our facilities, expansion of clean room facilities
and demonstration and development tools. None of these assets are held as collateral or guarantee other obligations. For additional information
on our capital expenditures, see “Item 5B. Liquidity and Capital Resources” in this Annual Report.
Government Regulation
For information relating to the impact of certain
government regulations on our business, see “Item 5.C – Grants from the Israel
Innovation Authority” on this Annual Report.
4.C Organizational
Structure
Our Subsidiaries
Our subsidiaries as of the end of 2025 and the
countries of their incorporation are as follows. All of our subsidiaries are wholly owned by the Company:
|
Name
of Subsidiary |
Place
of Incorporation |
|
Nova Measuring Instruments, Inc. |
Delaware, U.S. |
|
Nova Measuring Instruments K.K. |
Japan |
|
Nova Measuring Instruments Taiwan Ltd. |
Taiwan |
|
Nova Measuring Instruments Korea Ltd. |
Korea |
|
Nova Measuring Instruments GmbH |
Germany |
|
Nova Measuring Instruments (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. |
China |
|
Nova Measuring Instruments Singapore Pte Ltd |
Singapore |
Sentronics Metrology GmbH* |
Germany |
*A wholly owned subsidiary of Nova Measuring Instruments GmbH.
4.D
Property, Plant and Equipment
|
Location |
Purpose of use |
Approximate
SQM |
Expiration date |
|
Israel
Rehovot and Ness Ziona
|
Offices, manufacturing and laboratories
|
18,000
|
Rehovot 15,200 sqm - August 2029 with an option to extend the lease
period by two periods of five years each, subject to customary conditions. Ness Ziona 2800 sqm lease is expected to end in July 2029
|
|
US
Fremont California
|
Offices, manufacturing and laboratories |
10,800 |
August 2034 with an option to extend for an additional five years, subject to customary
conditions. |
|
Germany
Bad Urach |
Offices, manufacturing and laboratories |
6,500 |
The facility is owned by the Company and as of January 2025, has fully replaced the Pliezhausen
facility. |
|
Germany
Mannheim |
Offices, manufacturing and laboratories |
6,150 |
The facility is owned by the Company. |
|
Taiwan
Hsinchu |
Offices and laboratories |
2,000 |
Ranging between 2026 and 2031. |
|
US, China, Korea, Taiwan, Japan, Singapore |
Offices and laboratories |
Less than 2,000 each |
Ranging between 2025 and 2030. |
We believe that our facilities and equipment are
in good operating condition and adequate for their present usage.
Item 4A.
Unresolved Staff Comments
None.
Item 5. Operating
and Financial Review and Prospects
Information in this Operating Review and Financial
Prospects Section should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and notes thereto which are included elsewhere
in this Annual Report.
Executive Overview
Nova is a leading innovator and key provider of
metrology and process control solutions used in semiconductor manufacturing. We deliver continuous innovation by providing state-of-the-art
high-performance metrology solutions for effective process control throughout the semiconductor fabrication lifecycle. We industrialize
laboratory and research-grade technologies to develop differentiated inline metrology solutions that are deployed by a broad range of
customers, including the world’s largest integrated circuit manufacturers. Our portfolio combines high-precision hardware and cutting-edge
software for deep insight into the development and production of the most advanced semiconductor devices. Our solutions enable our customers
to improve device performance, enhance yields and accelerate time to market. We sell our solutions mainly to semiconductor manufacturers,
and in some cases to semiconductor process equipment manufacturers.
Our business is greatly affected by the level
of spending on capital equipment by semiconductor manufacturers. In addition, demand for our products and services is affected by the
timing of new IC capacity expansion and ramping up of new technology nodes, by the timing of releasing new products by us and our competitors,
market acceptance of our new or enhanced products and changes or improvements in semiconductor design or manufacturing processes.
In the past five years (2020-2025), we achieved
a positive Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of products revenues of approximately 27.5%, while Gartner Inc. estimates that the Process
Control sector has achieved a CAGR of approximately 16.0% (Gartner Q4-2025 forecast, published in December 2025). During these years,
we successfully diversified our technology to include Material and Chemical metrology capabilities, on top of our Dimensional metrology
solutions. We also added advanced machine learning algorithms on top of our physical modeling, and we advanced our traditional tool set
to include advanced capabilities in both hardware and software. We also diversified our revenue mix across semiconductor sectors, customers
and geographies. During these years, we were also able to increase our total available market through development of new technologies
used for Materials, Dimensional and chemical metrology, addressing emerging applications in Logic/Foundry, Memory and Packaging across
mature and advanced technology nodes.
In 2025, product sales accounted for approximately
80% of our total revenues, and services accounted for approximately 20%.
As of the end of 2025, we had cash reserves, net
of convertible senior notes, of approximately $914 million, and working capital of approximately $1,186 million, which consist of current
assets net of current liabilities.
Our service organization is operating on a profit-and-loss
basis, and the objectives of our service organization are defined and measured by customer satisfaction, quality support parameters, and
profit and loss criteria. The service organization provides support to all products we sell, during both the warranty period and the post
warranty period. Service revenues are mostly driven by extended warranty, time and material requests, service contracts and proactive
sales to the install base to improve productivity and metrology performance.
Significant Events in 2025 and Outlook for 2026
During 2025, we demonstrated several
significant achievements:
| |
• |
Record product and service sales results. |
| |
• |
Record profitability and earnings per share |
| |
• |
Diversified customers mix, across multiple territories. |
| |
• |
Further expansion into advanced packaging with new and existing products.
|
| |
• |
Further market adoption of Nova’s advanced portfolio:
|
| |
o |
Materials, chemical and dimensional metrology solutions. |
| |
o |
Hardware and software coupling. |
| |
o |
Machine learning and AI capabilities to complement physical modeling.
|
| |
o |
Holistic offering, including Integrated and Standalone metrology.
|
| |
• |
Continued proliferation of Nova’s advanced solutions across
the board |
| |
• |
Record sales of each of our product lines: optical integrated and
stand alone systems, materials metrology systems and chemical metrology systems. |
| |
• |
Record sales of materials and chemical metrology solutions.
|
| |
• |
Continued investments in research and development programs aimed
to generate new organic growth engines for process control. |
| |
• |
Deepening collaboration with research institutes and customers' development
centers, utilizing a variety of our products, leading to our positioning as a long-term technology development and high-volume manufacturing
partner. |
| |
• |
ESG (Environment, Social and Governance) – In 2025 we worked
to update our Sustainability Plan. We are determined as a company to play a vital role in creating a world that values equality, safety
and environmental health for the benefit of future generations to come. We remain committed to proactively invest in embedding social
responsibility and sustainability as part of our culture and business management to support our values. |
| |
• |
The acquisition of Sentronics, a privately held company headquartered
in Germany, closed on January 30, 2025. Sentronics is a global provider of wafer metrology tools for backend semiconductor fabrication.
Sentronics develops flexible and modular metrology tools equipped with multiple metrology sensors for a variety of critical dimension
applications, including thickness, roughness, and topography. |
| |
• |
On September 5, 2025, we closed an offering of $750 million aggregate
principal amount of 0% Convertible Senior Notes due 2030 in a private offering to qualified institutional buyers pursuant to Rule 144A
under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The funds raised will be utilized for further investment in the company’s growth and
resiliency in order to enhance shareholders’ value. |
In 2026, we plan to focus on the following:
| |
• |
Investing in organizational development to
enhance our human capital and the strength of our global teams based on our values and culture. |
| |
• |
Continue to strengthen our competitive market
position, through unique innovation and technological leadership and to meet future industry challenges. |
| |
• |
Continue executing our well-defined strategy to reach $1B USD in
revenues by 2027. The strategy defines the Company’s growth path in revenue, customers, technology and financial performance.
|
| |
• |
Expand our total available markets by addressing new emerging metrology
applications and markets sectors, through solutions delivery to the challenging buildup of advanced Logic technology nodes, memory scaled
3D-NAND nodes, DRAM scaled devices and advanced packaging schemes at leading edge customers. |
| |
• |
Continue delivering metrology systems for mature technology nodes
and traditional packaging, to support new applications ramp up and expansions. |
| |
• |
Continue the collaborations and joint research programs with leading
semiconductor manufacturers and relevant leading research institutes. |
| |
• |
Continue innovation and diversification of our products through new
product introductions to extend the Company’s market leadership and total available market. |
| |
• |
Create synergy between our product lines towards a combined offering
for advanced applications, which require dimensional, material and chemical metrology. |
| |
• |
Grow our production facilities and offices footprint to meet semiconductor
demand and our strategic plans and continue to develop modern and streamlined core business processes through new ERP and Service CRM
infrastructure. |
| |
• |
Build an extensive roadmap for Sentronics products to broaden our
portfolio and cater to additional applications. |
| |
• |
Create synergy between Nova and Sentronics’ technologies towards a combined and enhanced offering
for advanced packaging applications. |
| |
• |
Successfully completing the go‑live and stabilization of
our new ERP system. |
| |
• |
Continue looking for investment opportunities to broaden our portfolio
and enrich our brand. |
The major challenges we could face in fulfilling our plans include:
| |
• |
Meeting strategic, development, operational and delivery targets
considering the uncertainties around the macro-economic, geopolitical and trade restriction issues across the globe. |
| |
• |
On time delivery of the required solutions to meet the current and
future needs of our existing and new customers. |
| |
• |
Correctly understanding the market trends and competitive landscape
to ensure our products retain proper differentiation to win customer confidence. |
| |
• |
Creating aggressive, innovative and competitive roadmap deliverables
at reasonable costs to properly control expenses. |
| |
• |
Identifying the metrology evolution roadmap for future industry needs
to meet process control requirements and lead the market. |
| |
• |
Achieving long-term growth targets while supporting extensive growth
in all our activities. |
| |
• |
Building a solid global infrastructure and production capacity to
accommodate further growth. |
| |
• |
Challenges implementing our new ERP system. |
In order to address the risks above we implemented
a global plan to secure our employees’ safety, guarantee supply chain resiliency, assure business continuity and continuous support
to our customers.
We collaborate with key customers, equipment manufacturers,
and research institutes to stay informed about their metrology and process control requirements. This helps us align our roadmap to their
needs and address any technical or roadmap risks and challenges.
It is our belief that we have been able to consistently
improve our market position because of a combination of factors:
| |
• |
Optical metrology has become an enabler for the industry over the
last few years. |
| |
• |
Materials metrology has been widely adopted by leading memory and
logic/foundry customers. We expect further adoption in the next few years. |
| |
• |
The growing adoption of our metrology portfolio in the advanced packaging
market. |
| |
• |
The growing need for chemical process control and replenishment solutions,
driven by ESG and environment sustainability trends for reduction in chemical materials waste. |
| |
• |
Our unique metrology portfolio, combining optical, X-Ray and chemical
metrology for both dimensions and materials. This provides the most advanced portfolio, combining the best innovative metrology capabilities
with the best reliability and return on investment. |
| |
• |
The ability to provide a unique and differentiated technology portfolio
sets us apart from the competition and adds a competitive edge to our offering. |
| |
• |
Our solutions are well accepted by leading customers that allow us
to gain more market share with additional process steps and new applications. |
| |
• |
Our ability to closely team with our customers allows us to predict
the industry evolution and process control challenges and by that introduce innovative metrology roadmap to solve industry needs.
|
| |
• |
Our diversified portfolio, which is a result of continuous investment
in research and development, is becoming more attractive to our customers. |
| |
• |
Extending our solutions’ base to include hardware and software
elements in a coupled offering. |
| |
• |
Successful track record in completing and integrating inorganic products,
as a result of M&A, which allows us to diversify our product offering to expand our addressable markets. |
| |
• |
Well controlled and efficient operating model to support our profitable
growth and operational resiliency. |
We anticipate ongoing growth in the adoption of
our solutions as the semiconductor manufacturing process becomes increasingly complex and the industry evolves. We believe that our target
market is growing as we expand our offering to more stages of the semiconductor manufacturing process and develop innovative new metrology
solutions. As the semiconductor production process becomes increasingly challenging, we believe that the need for our diverse portfolio
of technologies for dimensional, materials and chemical metrology will continue to grow in the coming years.
5.A
Operating Results
Overview
A substantial portion of our revenues is generated
from a small number of customers, and we anticipate that our revenues will continue to depend on a limited number of major customers.
For the distribution of our total revenues, from
products and services, by geographic areas, see Note 16 to our consolidated financial statements.
The sale cycle of our systems is long and the
rate and timing of customer orders may vary significantly from month to month as a function of the specific timing of fab expansions.
We schedule production of our systems based upon order backlog and customer forecasts.
Our revenues increased by 31% in 2025 following
an increase of 30% in 2024 following a decrease of 9% in 2023.
The following table shows the relationship, expressed
as a percentage, of the listed items from our consolidated income statements to our total revenues for the periods indicated:
Percentage of Total Revenues
Year ended December 31:
|
|
|
2023 |
|
|
2024 |
|
|
2025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from product sales |
|
|
78 |
% |
|
|
80 |
% |
|
|
80 |
% |
|
Revenues from services |
|
|
22 |
% |
|
|
20 |
% |
|
|
20 |
% |
|
Total revenues |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of products sale |
|
|
32 |
% |
|
|
31 |
% |
|
|
32 |
% |
|
Cost of services |
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
11 |
% |
|
Total cost of revenues |
|
|
43 |
% |
|
|
42 |
% |
|
|
43 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
57 |
% |
|
|
58 |
% |
|
|
57 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development expenses, net |
|
|
17 |
% |
|
|
16 |
% |
|
|
16 |
% |
|
Sales and marketing expenses |
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
9 |
% |
|
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
3 |
% |
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
31 |
% |
|
|
30 |
% |
|
|
29 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit |
|
|
26 |
% |
|
|
28 |
% |
|
|
29 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial income (expense), net |
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
6 |
% |
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
30 |
% |
|
|
32 |
% |
|
|
34 |
% |
|
Income tax expenses |
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
26 |
% |
|
|
27 |
% |
|
|
29 |
% |
Comparison of Years Ended December 31, 2025 and
2024
Revenues.
Our revenues in 2025 increased by $208.2 million, or 31%, compared to 2024. Revenues attributable to product sales were $705.6 million,
an increase of $167.2 million, or 31%, compared to 2024. Revenues attributable to services were $175.0 million, an increase of $40.9 million,
or 31%, compared to 2024. The increase in product revenues in 2025 was attributed to higher demand for our products across all main product
lines and to the acquisition of Sentronics. The increase in services revenue in 2025 was primarily driven by the growth of our installed
systems base.
Cost of Revenues
and Gross Profit. Cost of revenues consists of labor, material and overhead costs of manufacturing
our systems, royalties, amortization of intangible assets and the costs associated with our worldwide service and support infrastructure.
It also consists of inventory write-offs and provisions for estimated future warranty costs for systems we have sold. Our cost of revenues
attributable to product sales in 2025 was $282.1 million compared to $210.6 million in 2024 in line with the increase in product revenue.
Our gross margin attributable to product revenues in 2025 was 60%, compared to 61% in 2024. The decline in product gross margins in 2025
was primarily driven by a shift in the product and customer volumes mix. Our cost of services in 2025 was $93.3 million, compared to $74.7
million in 2024. Gross margin attributable to service revenues in 2025 was 47%, compared to 44% in 2024 in line with the increase in service
revenue. The increase in service gross margin in 2025 was primarily due to economies of scale resulting from higher service revenue volumes.
Research and
Development Expenses, net. Consist primarily of salaries and related expenses and also include consulting
fees, subcontracting costs, related materials and overhead expenses, after offsetting grants received or receivable from governmental
funding of research and development activities. Our net research and development expenses in 2025 were $143.4 million, an increase of
$33.1 million, or 30%, compared to 2024, after offsetting grants received of $2.4 million in 2025 and $2.2 million in 2024. Research and
development expenses excluding grants received or receivable in 2025 were $145.8 million, compared to $112.4 million in 2024. The increase
in 2025 is mainly related to higher investment in existing and new products and technologies, higher personnel costs and the addition
of Sentronics. In 2025, net research and development expenses represented 16% of our revenues similar to 2024.
Sales and Marketing
Expenses. Sales and marketing expenses are mainly comprised of salaries and related costs for sales
and marketing personnel, travel related expenses, overhead and commissions to our representatives and sales personnel. Our sales and marketing
expenses in 2025 were $82.2 million, an increase of $17.1 million, or 26%, compared to 2024. The increase is due to the increase in revenues.
Sales and marketing expenses represented 9.3% of our revenues in 2025 compared to 9.7% in 2024.
General and Administrative
Expenses. General and administrative expenses are comprised of salaries and related expenses
and other non-personnel related expenses such as legal expenses. Our general and administrative expenses in 2025 were $26.1 million, an
increase of $1.9 million, or 8%, compared to 2024. The increase in general and administrative expenses in 2025 was primarily driven by
higher personnel costs and related overhead, including post-merger integration costs and to the addition of Sentronics expenses. In 2025,
general and administration expenses represented 3.0% of our revenues, compared to 3.6% in 2024.
Financial income,
net. Financial income, net is comprised of interest income, financial expenses related to the 2030
Convertible Senior Notes offering which we completed in September 2025, exchange rate impact and bank charges. In 2025, we recorded $49.8
million of net financial income compared to $28.7 million in 2024. The increase in financial income in 2025 was mainly attributed to higher
interest income and exchange rate impact in 2025.
Income Tax Expenses.
Income tax expenses are comprised of current tax expenses and deferred tax expenses/income. In 2025, we recorded $44.1 million income
tax expenses compared to $32.5 million in 2024. The increase is due the increase in profitability. 2025 tax expenses reflecting effective
tax rate of 15% same as 2024
Comparison of Years Ended December 31, 2024 and
2023 is incorporated by reference to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 20-F filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on February 20, 2025.
5.B
Liquidity and Capital Resources
As of December 31, 2025, we had working
capital of approximately $1,186 million, compared to working capital of approximately $514 million as of December 31, 2024. The increase
in our working capital in 2025 was mainly attributed to the increase in cash and cash equivalents, short-term deposits and marketable
securities and due to the decrease in the 2025 convertible senior notes fully converted by end of 2025.
Cash and cash equivalents, short-term and long-term
deposits and marketable securities as of December 31, 2025 were $1,646 million compared to $820 million as of December 31, 2024, and increased
mainly due to the 2030 Convertible Senior Notes offering and our fluent operating cash flow, partially offset by Sentronics acquisition,
share repurchase and the purchase of the capped calls.
Trade accounts receivable increased from $139
million as of December 31, 2024 to $152 million as of December 31, 2025.
Inventories increased from $157 million as of
December 31, 2024 to $184 million as of December 31, 2025. The increase in inventory was driven by higher business activity. Operating
activities in 2025 generated positive cash flow from operating activities of $245 million compared to a positive cash flow from operating
activities of $235 million in 2024.
The following table describes our investments
in capital expenditures during the last three years (US dollars, in thousands):
|
|
|
2023 |
|
|
2024 |
|
|
2025 |
|
|
|
|
Domestic |
|
|
Abroad |
|
|
Domestic |
|
|
Abroad |
|
|
Domestic |
|
|
Abroad |
|
|
Electronic equipment |
|
|
2,086 |
|
|
|
2,867 |
|
|
|
1,313 |
|
|
|
3,077 |
|
|
|
3,228 |
|
|
|
8,404 |
|
|
Office furniture and equipment |
|
|
360 |
|
|
|
499 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
202 |
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
2,323 |
|
|
Leasehold improvements |
|
|
2,994 |
|
|
|
2,457 |
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
843 |
|
|
|
670 |
|
|
|
6,092 |
|
|
Land and buildings |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
5,925 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
11,660 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
6,886 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
5,440 |
|
|
|
11,748 |
|
|
|
1,433 |
|
|
|
15,782 |
|
|
|
3,993 |
|
|
|
23,705 |
|
In 2025, the gross investment in capital expenditures,
including inventory items moved to capital and investment in the new ERP, was approximately $33 million, and was financed from our operating
cash flow. In 2026, we expect our gross capital spending to remain at a similar level, primarily driven by ongoing investments in facilities
and infrastructure.
Our principal liquidity requirement is expected
to be for working capital and capital expenditures as well as additional acquisitions and investment in the new ERP. We believe that our
current cash reserves will be adequate to fund our planned activities for at least the next twelve months. Our long-term capital requirements
will be affected by many factors, including the success of our current products, our ability to enhance our current products and our ability
to develop and introduce new products that will be accepted by the semiconductor industry. We plan to finance our long-term capital needs
with our cash reserves together with positive cash flow from operations, if any. If these funds are insufficient to finance our future
business activities, which may include acquisitions, we would have to raise additional funds through the issuance of additional equity
or debt securities, through borrowing or through other means. We cannot assure that additional financing will be available on acceptable
terms.
Presently, our long-term debt is comprised from
Convertible Senior Notes.
We do not have a readily available source of other
short-term or long-term debt financing such as a line of credit.
With regard to usage of hedging financial instruments
and the impact of inflation and currency fluctuations, see “Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk”
in this Annual Report.
5.C
Research and Development, Patents and Licenses, etc.
For information regarding our research and development
activities, see “Item 4B – Research and Development” in this Annual Report.
Grants from the Israeli Innovation Authority & European Programs
IIA sponsoring for generic research and development
projects of large Israeli companies
We participate in a generic research and development
programs sponsored by the IIA, available for Israeli companies that meet specific criteria’s set forth by the IIA. Companies eligible
to participate in these programs receive IIA funding intended to focus on long-term creation of know-how and technological infrastructure,
used for the development or production of future innovative products. These programs do not require payments of royalties to the IIA,
but all other restrictions under the Innovation Law, such as local manufacturing obligations and know-how transfer limitations, as further
detailed hereunder, are applicable to the know how developed by us with the funding received in such programs.
Joint programs of the European Research Area
and the IIA (for Nova Ltd.) or BMBF (for Nova Measuring Instruments GmbH)
We participate in European consortia, which are
joint programs governed by the Electronic Component Systems (ECSEL), Key Digital Technologies (KDT), which starting from 2023 is re-named
to European CHIPACTS, for European Leadership Joint Undertaking (the “JU”) as
part of the Horizon 2020 & Horizon Europe, respectively, which form cooperations between the participating companies.
Some of the obligations and undertakings specified
hereunder in connection with IIA or BMBF activities (such as the restrictions under the Innovation Law and obligation to grant certain
access rights to our technology and intellectual property rights) apply with respect to some of these joint projects. In addition, the
participation in an EU Consortia includes specific obligations, such as the following: The budgeted grant will be paid to the company
pursuant to certain rules regarding ‘eligible costs’; Obligations to properly implement the activities assigned under the
specific EU Consortia project grant agreement; Restrictions in contributions of third parties (by service or otherwise); Obligations to
keep information up to date and to inform about events and circumstances likely to affect the consortium activity; Obligations related
to records keeping, investigations and audits by the JU in order to verify the proper implementation of the specific EU Consortium project
and compliance with the obligations under the terms of the program, including assessing deliverables and reports during a period of up
to two years following the receipt by the company of the full grant payment; Obligations related to Intellectual property allocation generated
by an EU Consortium, background intellectual property designation prior to the commencement of the EU Consortium’s project and the
provision of access rights to results obtained as part of the EU Consortium. Breach of such obligations may result in the reduction of
the aggregate expected grant amount or claiming back previously received grants. In addition, the company may be subject to administrative
and financial penalties such as temporary exclusion from all JU European Consortia and fines of up to 10% of the maximum expected grant,
as well as to contractual liabilities.
European Research Area program
We also participate in European consortia which
are not part of the JU (Joint Undertaking) program, thus, these programs are funded only by the European commission with no national funding
from the Israel Innovation Authority. The restrictions under the Israeli Innovation Law do not apply to the project under these programs.
Past royalty bearing programs and royalties arrangements
Some of our previous research and development
efforts were financed in part through royalty-bearing grants. We were obligated to pay royalties from sales of products funded with these
grants. This obligation included different annual interest rates ranging up to 5%. In August 2016, we entered into a royalty buyout arrangement
(the “Arrangement”) with the IIA. As part of the Arrangement, we paid approximately $12.9 million to the IIA in September
2016. The contingent net royalty liability to the IIA at the time we executed the Arrangement was approximately $24 million. As a result
of the foregoing payment, we are released from any future royalty payments on these previous funds received from the IIA. However, to
the extent that we will be able to commercialize products that were developed as part of IIA programs and were declared as “failed”
at the time of the Arrangement, we will be required to pay royalties to the IIA from income generated from such commercialization. Currently,
we do not anticipate that such failed projects will generate revenues in the future. We note that the Arrangement does not release the
Company from other obligations towards the IIA as further detailed herein. In addition, in the future, we may, alone or together with
third parties, participate in research and development programs, which may bear royalty obligations (depending on the specific terms of
the applicable program).
Pertinent obligations under the Israeli Encouragement
of Research, Development and Technological Innovation in the Industry Law 1984
Under the Encouragement of Research, Development
and Technological Innovation in the Industry Law 1984 and the provisions of the applicable regulations, rules, procedures and benefit
tracks, together the Innovation Law, a qualifying research and development program is typically eligible for grants of up to 55% of the
program’s pre-approved research and development expenses. The program must be approved by a committee of the IIA. The recipient
of the grants is required to return the grants by the payment of royalties on the revenues generated from the sale of products (and related
services) developed (in whole or in part) under IIA program up to the total amount of the grants received from IIA, linked to the U.S.
dollar and bearing annual interest (as determined in the Innovation Law). Following the full payment of such royalties and interest, there
is generally no further liability for royalty payment for our currently developed and sold products. Nonetheless, the restrictions under
the Innovation Law (as generally specified below) will continue to apply even after our company has repaid the grants, including accrued
interest, in full.
The main pertinent obligations under the Innovation
Law are as follows:
| |
• |
Local Manufacturing Obligation.
The terms of the grants under the Innovation Law require that we manufacture the products developed with these grants in Israel. Under
the regulations promulgated under the Innovation Law, the products may be manufactured outside Israel by us or by another entity only
if prior approval is received from the IIA (such approval is not required for the transfer of less than 10% of the manufacturing capacity
in the aggregate, as declared to be manufactured out of Israel in the applications for funding, in which case a notice should be provided
to the IIA). This approval may be given only if we abide by all the provisions of the Innovation Law and related regulations. Ordinarily,
as a condition to obtaining approval to manufacture outside Israel, we would be required to pay royalties at an increased rate (usually
1% in addition to the standard rate and increased royalties cap between 120% and 300% of the grants, depending on the manufacturing volume
that is performed outside Israel). |
| |
• |
Know-How transfer limitation.
The Innovation Law restricts the ability to transfer know-how funded by the IIA outside of Israel, including by way of a license to a
non-Israeli entity. Transfer of IIA funded know-how outside of Israel requires prior approval of the IIA. The IIA approval to transfer
know-how created, in whole or in part, in connection with an IIA-funded project to third party outside Israel is subject to payment of
a redemption fee to the IIA calculated according to a formula provided under the Innovation Law that is based, in general, on the ratio
between the aggregate IIA grants to the company’s aggregate investments in the project that was funded by these IIA grants, multiplied
by the transaction consideration, taking into account depreciation mechanism, and less royalties already paid to the IIA. The regulations
promulgated under the Innovation Law establish a maximum payment of the redemption fee paid to the IIA under the above mentioned formulas
and differentiates between two situations: (i) in the event that the company sells its IIA funded know-how, in whole or in part, or is
sold as part of an M&A transaction, and subsequently ceases to conduct business in Israel, the maximum redemption fee under the above
mentioned formulas will be no more than six times the total grants received (plus accrued interest) for development of the know-how being
transferred, or the entire amount received from the IIA, as applicable; (ii) in the event that following the transactions described above
(i.e., asset sale of IIA funded know-how or transfer as part of an M&A transaction) the company undertakes to continue its R&D
activity in Israel (for at least three years following such transfer and maintain at least 75% of its R&D staff employees it had for
the six months before the know-how was transferred, while keeping the same scope of employment for such R&D staff), then the company
is eligible for a reduced cap of the redemption fee of no more than three times the amounts received (plus accrued interest) for the applicable
know-how being transferred, or the entire amount received from the IIA, as applicable. No assurance can be given that approval of any
such transfer, if requested, will be granted and what will be the amount of the redemption fee payable. |
Approval of the transfer of IIA funded technology
to another Israeli company requires a pre-approval by IIA and may be granted only if the recipient undertakes to fulfil all the liabilities
to IIA and undertakes abides by all the provisions of the Innovation law and related regulations, including the restrictions on the transfer
of know-how and manufacturing rights outside of Israel and the obligation to pay royalties. In light of the Arrangement (as further discussed
below), in certain circumstances, under such sale transactions (i.e., the transfer of IIA funded technology or portion thereof to another
Israeli company), we might be obligated to pay royalties to the IIA from any income derived from such a sale transaction.
| |
• |
Licensing arrangements.
Under the terms of the Innovation Law, licensing know how developed under the IIA programs outside of Israel, requires prior consent of
IIA and payment of license fees to IIA, calculated in accordance with the licensing rules promulgated under the Innovation Law. The payment
of the license fees does not discharge the company from the obligation to pay royalties or other payments due to IIA in accordance with
Innovation Law. |
These restrictions may impair our ability to enter
into agreements for those products or technologies which were developed with assistance of the IIA grants without the approval of the
IIA. We cannot be certain that any approval of the IIA will be obtained on terms that are acceptable to us, or at all. Furthermore, in
the event that we undertake a transaction involving the transfer to a non-Israeli entity of know-how developed with IIA funding pursuant
to a merger or similar transaction, the consideration available to our shareholders may be reduced by the amounts we are required to pay
to the IIA. Any approval, if given, will generally be subject to additional financial obligations. Failure to comply with the requirements
under the Innovation Law may subject us to mandatory repayment of grants received by us (together with interest and penalties), as well
as may expose us to criminal proceedings. In addition, IIA may from time-to-time audit sales of products which it claims incorporate technology
funded via IIA programs and this may lead to additional royalties being payable on additional products.
5.D
Trend Information
For information regarding the most significant
recent trends in our market, see “Item 4B– Our Market – The Semiconductor
Market – Update” in this Annual Report.
5.E
Critical Accounting Estimates
We have provided a summary of our significant
accounting policies, estimates and judgments in Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements, which are included elsewhere in this
Annual Report. The following critical accounting discussion pertains to accounting estimates management believes are most critical to
the portrayal of our historical financial condition and results of operations and that require significant, difficult, subjective or complex
judgments. Other companies in similar businesses may use different estimation policies and methodologies, which may impact the comparability
of our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows to those of other companies.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity
with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of
assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts
of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Our management evaluates its estimates on an ongoing basis, including those related
to, but not limited to revenue recognition, allowance for credit losses related to marketable securities, inventory write-offs, business
combination, fair value and useful lives of intangible assets, and income taxes and tax uncertainties. These estimates are based on management's
knowledge about current events and expectations about actions the Company may undertake in the future. Actual results could differ from
those estimates.
Revenue Recognition
Under ASC 606, the company derives revenue from
the sales of advanced process control systems, spare parts, labor hours (mainly systems installation) and service contracts.
Contracts with customers may include multiple
performance obligations. For such arrangements, the Company allocates revenue to each performance obligation based on its relative Standalone
Selling Price (“SSP”). Judgment is required to determine the SSP for each distinct performance obligation. The Company uses
a range of amounts to estimate SSP when it sells each of the products and services separately and needs to determine whether there is
a discount to be allocated based on the relative SSP of the various products and services.
The Company enters into revenue arrangements that
include products and services which are generally distinct and accounted for as separate performance obligations. The Company determines
whether arrangements are distinct based on whether the customer can benefit from the product or service on its own or together with other
resources that are readily available and whether the Company's commitment to transfer the product or service to the customer is separately
identifiable from other obligations in the contract.
Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or
net realizable value. Inventory write-downs are provided to cover risks arising from slow-moving items, technological obsolescence, excess
inventories, discontinued products, and for market prices lower than cost, if any. We periodically evaluate the quantities on hand relative
to historical and projected sales volume (which is determined based on an assumption of future demand and market conditions), the age
of the inventory and the expected consumption of service spare parts. At the point of the loss recognition, a new lower cost basis for
that inventory is established. Any adjustments to reduce the cost of inventories to their net realizable value are recognized in earnings
in the current period.
Business Combination
The results of an acquired business in a business
combination are included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements from the date of acquisition according to the guidance
of ASC Topic 805, “Business Combinations.” The Company allocates the purchase price, which is the sum of the consideration
provided and may consist of cash, equity or a combination of the two, to the identifiable assets and liabilities of the acquired business
at their fair values as of the acquisition date. The excess of the purchase price over the amount allocated to the identifiable assets
and liabilities, if any, is recorded as goodwill.
We allocate the purchase price to the tangible
and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed, based on their estimated fair values. These valuations require management to make
significant estimations and assumptions, especially with respect to intangible assets. Critical estimates in valuing intangible assets
include future expected cash flows from technology acquired, backlog and customer relationships. Management’s estimates of fair
value are based on assumptions believed to be reasonable, but which are inherently uncertain and unpredictable.
Intangible assets are comprised of acquired technology
and customer relations.
Accounting for income tax
We are subject to income taxes in Israel, the
United States and numerous foreign jurisdictions. Judgment is required in evaluating our uncertain tax positions and determining our taxes.
Although we believe our reserves are reasonable, no assurance can be given that the final tax outcome of these matters will not be different
from that which is reflected in our historical income tax provisions and accruals. We adjust these reserves in light of changing facts
and circumstances, such as the closing of a tax audit or the refinement of an estimate. To the extent that the final tax outcome of these
matters is different than the amounts recorded, such differences will affect the provision for income taxes in the period in which such
determination is made.
Judgment is also required in determining any valuation
allowance recorded against deferred tax assets. In assessing the need for a valuation allowance, we consider all available evidence, including
past operating results, estimates of future taxable income, and the feasibility of tax planning strategies. In the event that we change
our determination as to the amount of deferred tax assets that can be realized, we will adjust our valuation allowance with a corresponding
impact to the provision for income taxes in the period in which such determination is made.
For a discussion of other significant accounting
policies used in the preparation of our financial statements and recent accounting pronouncements, see Note 2 to our consolidated financial
statements contained elsewhere in this Annual Report.
Item 6. Directors,
Senior Management and Employees
6.A
Directors and Senior Management
The following is the
list of senior management and directors as of February 5, 2026:
|
Name
|
Age
|
Position
|
|
Eitan Oppenhaim (4) |
60 |
Chairman of the Board of Directors
|
|
Avi Cohen (1)(2) (4) |
72 |
Director |
|
Raanan Cohen (2)(3) |
70 |
Director |
|
Zehava Simon (1)(2)(3)(4) |
67 |
Director |
|
Sarit Sagiv (1)(2) |
57 |
Director |
|
Yaniv Garty (3)(4) |
58 |
Director |
|
Rami Hadar (4) |
63 |
Director |
|
Gabriel Waisman |
55 |
President & CEO |
|
Guy Kizner
|
42 |
Chief Financial Officer |
|
Shay Wolfling
|
54 |
Chief Technology Officer |
|
Adrian S. Wilson |
54 |
President of US subsidiary & General Manager Material Metrology
Division |
|
Effi Aboody |
55 |
Corporate VP and General Manager Dimensional Metrology Division
|
|
Thomas Schütt |
54 |
General Manager Chemical Metrology Division |
|
(1) |
Member of the audit committee |
|
(2) |
Member of the compensation committee |
|
(3) |
Member of the nominating governance and sustainability committee |
|
(4) |
Member of the strategy and M&A committee |
Mr. Eitan Oppenhaim
was named chairman of our board of directors on March 31, 2023, after serving as member of our board of directors from October 2019. Mr.
Oppenhaim served as the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company from July 31, 2013, until March 31, 2023, and has previously
served as the Executive Vice President Global Business Group, since November 2010. As of November 2025, Mr. Oppenhaim serves as a director
of TAT Technologies (Nasdaq: TATT). From 2009 until 2010, Mr. Oppenhaim served as Vice President and Europe General Manager of Alvarion
Ltd., a public company traded on Nasdaq. During the years 2007 through 2009, Mr. Oppenhaim served as Vice President of sales and marketing
of OptimalTest Ltd. Prior to that, from 2002 until 2006, Mr. Oppenhaim served as Vice President – Business Manager of the Flat Panel
Displays division of Orbotech Ltd., a public company traded on Nasdaq. From 2001 until 2002, Mr. Oppenhaim served as Managing Director
of Asia Pacific at TTI Telecom International, a leading provider of assurance, analytics and optimization solutions to communications
service providers (CSP) worldwide. Prior to that, from 1994 until 2001, Mr. Oppenhaim held several key executive positions at Comverse
Network Systems Ltd., a public company traded on Nasdaq. Mr. Oppenhaim holds a BA in Economics from the Haifa University, Israel and an
MBA from Ben-Gurion University, Beer-Sheva, Israel.
Mr. Avi Cohen has
served as a director of the Company since 2008 and during the period between December 2022 and March 2023 he also served as the interim
chairperson of our board of directors while Dr. Michael Brunstein was absent for health-related reasons. Additionally, Mr. Cohen serves
as Chairman of ZOOZ Power Ltd. (TASE: ZOOZ) and as a director of Cognyte Software Ltd. (Nasdaq: CGNT) as well as on the board of directors
of Cortica Ltd., and Sight Diagnostics. From July 2016 to September 2017 Mr. Cohen served as the CEO of MX1, a global media service provider
founded in July 2016 post acquisition of RR Media (Nasdaq: RRM) by SES S.A. and merger between RR Media, and SES Platform Services GmbH.
From July 2012 until the merger, Mr. Cohen served as the CEO of RR Media. Prior to that, until March 2012, Mr. Cohen served as President
and CEO of Orbit Technologies (TASE: ORBI). From September 2006 until December 2008, Mr. Cohen served as chief operating officer and deputy
to the CEO of ECI Telecom Ltd. Prior to joining ECI, Mr. Cohen served in a variety of executive management positions at KLA (Nasdaq: KLAC)
and was group vice president and member of the executive management committee starting 2003. Prior to joining KLA, Mr. Cohen also spent
three years as managing director of Octel Communications, Israel, after serving as CEO of Allegro Intelligent Systems, which he founded
and which was acquired by Octel. Mr. Cohen holds a B.Sc. and a M.Sc. in electrical engineering and applied physics from Case Western Reserve
University, U.S.
Mr. Raanan Cohen
was appointed as a director of the Company by our board of directors in February 2014. Prior to that and until December 2012, Mr. Cohen
served as the President and Chief Executive Officer of Orbotech Ltd., a public company traded on Nasdaq. Mr. Cohen also served in a range
of other executive positions at Orbotech Ltd, including Co-President for Business and Strategy, EVP and President of the Printed Circuit
Board (PCB) Division, Vice President for the PCB-AOI product line and President and chief executive officer of Orbotech, Inc. Prior to
its merger with Orbotech in 1991, Mr. Cohen held various positions at Orbot, another manufacturer of AOI systems. Prior to joining
Orbot in 1984, he worked at Telrad Networks Ltd. Mr. Cohen serves as director of Eyecuracy Ltd., and of Claro Ltd., both private companies,
served as the Chief Executive Officer of EyeWay Vision Ltd., a private company until November 2024, and has served as a director of Gezuntech
therapeutics, a private company until January 2025. Mr. Cohen holds a B.Sc. from the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel.
Ms. Zehava Simon
was elected as the Company’s external director in accordance with the provisions of the Companies Law in June 2014 and reelected
in June 2017. Effective as of May 2018, and our adoption of the exemption under the Regulation (as defined below), Ms. Simon is no longer
classified as an external director under the Companies Law. Ms. Simon served as a Vice President of BMC Software from 2000 until
2013 and in her last position (as of 2011) acted as Vice President of Corporate Development. From 2002 to 2011, Ms. Simon served as Vice
President and General Manager of BMC Software in Israel. In this role, she was responsible for directing operations in Israel and India
as well as offshore sites. Prior to that, Ms. Simon held various positions at Intel Israel., which she joined in 1982, including leading
of Finance & Operations and Business Development for Intel in Israel. Ms. Simon is currently a board member of Audiocodes Ltd., a
public company traded on Nasdaq and TASE, Nice Ltd., a public company traded on Nasdaq and TASE. Ms. Simon is a former member of the board
of directors of Insightec Ltd. (2005-2012), M-Systems Ltd., a Nasdaq listed company which was acquired in 2006 by SanDisk Corp., a public
company traded on Nasdaq as well (2005-2006) and Tower Semiconductor Ltd., a public company traded on TASE and Nasdaq (1999-2004). Ms.
Simon holds a B.A. in Social Sciences from the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel, a law degree (LL.B.) from Reichman University (formerly,
the Interdisciplinary Center in Herzliya, Israel) and an M.A. in Business and Management from Boston University, U.S.
Ms. Sarit Sagiv
was appointed to serve as a director of the Company by our board of directors in August 2021. Ms. Sagiv serves as a member of the Investments
Committee of Phoenix Insurance and as a member of the board of directors of OPC Energy Ltd., a public company traded on TASE. Ms. Sagiv
served as General Manager of the Global Business division at Amdocs (Nasdaq: DOX) between 2016 and 2020. Prior to this role, Ms. Sagiv
served as the Chief Financial Officer of Nice Ltd. (Nasdaq and TASE: NICE), with responsibility for the finance, legal, operations and
IT areas, and before that as the Chief Financial Officer of Retalix Ltd. (Nasdaq and TASE: RTLX). Ms. Sagiv also held various other Chief
Financial Officer and senior financial positions. Ms. Sagiv is a certified public accountant. She holds a B.A. in Accounting and Economics
and an MBA, both from Tel-Aviv University, Israel and an M.A. in Law from Bar Ilan University, Israel.
Mr. Yaniv Garty
was appointed to serve as a director of the Company by our board of directors as of April 2, 2023. From January 2017 to February 2023,
Mr. Garty was a Vice President at Intel, a public company traded on the Nasdaq, and the General Manager of Intel Israel – Israel’s
largest Hi-Tech employer and Intel’s largest operation outside the U.S. Before returning to Israel from the Bay Area, Mr. Garty
held multiple positions within Intel since its acquisition of Envara Inc. in 2004. He initially served as Chief Operating Officer of Intel’s
Broadband Wireless Division (WiMAX/4G and WLAN solutions), and from 2011 to 2018 as the General Manager of the Wireless Connectivity Solutions
business unit, a worldwide organization responsible for delivering wireless connectivity technologies and products. Prior to Intel’s
acquisition of Envara, Mr. Garty had multiple engineering, business, and managerial positions in different companies, including Serconet
Networks, Optibase, and Orckit Communications. Prior to this, Mr. Garty served as a R&D Engineer with the Ministry of Defense of Israel.
Mr. Garty serves as a director of the board of Strauss Group, a publicly traded company (TASE: STRS) as of September 2024. Additionally,
Mr. Garty serves as the Chairman of the America-Israel Chamber of Commerce since January 2018, a voluntary organization of more than 230
Israeli and multinational companies. Mr. Garty holds a B.Sc. in electrical engineering and an MBA, both from Tel Aviv University, Israel.
Mr. Rami Hadar
was appointed to serve as a director of the Company by our board of directors as of December 24, 2025. Mr. Hadar serves as a director
on the board of directors and as chairman of the compensation committee of Ceragon Networks Ltd. (Nasdaq: CRNT) since 2021. Additionally,
Mr. Hadar serves as a managing partner in Claridge Israel, a high-tech growth fund since 2017. Amongst his responsibilities are identifying
potential investment targets, leading extensive due diligence processes and acting as a proactive board member to help management teams
scale and create shareholder value. Prior to joining Claridge, from 2006 to 2014, Mr. Hadar served as CEO and board member of Allot Communications
(Nasdaq: ALLT). Under his leadership, Allot transitioned from a private company into a fast-growing, public company with over $100M of
sales and high profitability. Prior to his roles in Allot, Mr. Hadar co-founded and served as CEO of CTP Systems (micro cellular networks)
until its acquisition by DSP Communications (Nasdaq: DSPC). Additionally, Mr. Hadar serves on the board of directors of AlgoSec Inc.,
a private company, since 2017 and D-Fend Solutions, a private company since 2019. Mr. Hadar holds a B.Sc. in Electrical Engineering from
the Technion Institute of Technology, Israel.
Mr. Gabriel Waisman
was appointed by our board of directors as the Company’s President & Chief Executive Officer, effective as of March 31, 2023.
Mr. Waisman previously served as the Company’s Chief Business Officer (CBO) since 2016, responsible for customer facing groups,
including global sales, marketing, customer support and applications. Mr. Waisman has over 17 years of managerial expertise in a global
geographically dispersed environment, and extensive experience pioneering multidisciplinary technologies, particularly within the Electronics
and Telecom sectors. Prior to joining Nova, Mr. Waisman served as President of both Orbotech Pacific (Orbotech Ltd Hong Kong) and Orbotech
West (Orbotech Inc., USA) where he was responsible for Sales & Marketing, Finance and Operations, and Customer Support. Prior to this,
Mr. Waisman served in various managerial positions at Alvarion, starting as Strategic Marketing Director, EMEA, and moving on to Vice
President of Strategic Accounts, General Manager of Western Europe, followed by Managing Director, Asia-Pacific. Mr. Waisman has also
served as EMEA Regional Sales & Marketing Director (Broadband Division) at Comverse. He holds a B.Sc. in Electronic Engineering from
the Technion Institute of Technology in Israel and an MBA in Business Administration from the Tel-Aviv University, Israel.
Mr. Guy Kizner
has served as the Chief Financial Officer since July 1, 2024. Mr. Kizner joined Nova in 2010 and
served in several key financial positions such as Director of Financial Planning & Analysis and Vice President of Corporate Finance.
Prior to joining Nova, Mr. Kizner held various finance roles at Delek Group (TASE: DLEKG) and Israel Aerospace Industries, broadening
his expertise in the financial sector. Mr. Kizner holds a B.A. in Accounting from Bar Ilan University, Israel, a B.A. in Economics and
an MBA from the College of Management Academic Studies, Israel.
Dr. Shay Wolfling
joined Nova in 2011, as Chief Technology Officer. Prior to joining Nova, Dr. Wolfling was an R&D manager at KLA-Tencor-Belgium (formerly
ICOS Vision Systems, a public traded company acquired by KLA in 2008), where he led multidisciplinary metrology & inspection development
projects. From 2000 until its technology acquisition by ICOS in 2005, Dr. Wolfling was a founder and Vice President of Research and Development
of Nano-Or-Technologies, a start-up company with a proprietary technology for 3D optical measurements. Dr. Wolfling helped Nano-Or develop
from the idea stage to initial product sales. Prior to founding Nano-Or, Dr. Wolfling was a project manager in Y-Beam-Technologies, a
start-up offering laser-based skin treatments. Dr. Wolfling has several patents under his name in the field of optical measurements. Dr.
Wolfling holds a B.Sc. in physics and mathematics from the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel, a second degree in physics from
Tel-Aviv University, Israel and a Ph.D. in physics from the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel.
Mr. Adrian S.
Wilson joined Nova in January 2018 as General Manager Material Metrology Division and President of
our U.S. subsidiary, Nova Measuring Instruments, Inc. Mr. Wilson has over 30 years of Semiconductor capital equipment and materials experience.
Mr. Wilson joins us from Nanometrics Inc., where he held the position of Vice President & General Manager of Advanced Imaging and
Analytics Business Unit. Prior to Nanometrics Inc., he held the position of Managing Director of Element Six Technologies Ltd., the non-abrasive
arm of the synthetic diamond group of DeBeers, focused on thermal management and optical components for the semiconductor industry. Mr.
Wilson has experience in leading both start-ups and divisions within large public multi-national companies, including KLA, FormFactor
Inc. and Phoenix X-ray Systems & Services Inc., a capital equipment start-up. Mr. Wilson holds a bachelor’s degree in Electronics
Engineering, post Grad in Marketing Management and an MBA in Technology Management. Mr. Wilson’s accreditations include Fellow of
the Chartered Institute of Marketing (UK) and Fellow of the Institute of Directors (UK).
Mr. Effi Aboody
has served as our Corporate VP and General Manager Dimensional Metrology Division since September
2019. Mr. Aboody joined Nova in 2016 as Vice President and Head of the Global Applications team. Mr. Aboody started his career at Intel
Corporation Ltd in 1996 as an Integration engineer, working in Portland and California R&D centers, in both logic and memory
devices, followed by several managerial positions including Process Integration, Sort testing manager and Yield manager. In 2008, Mr.
Aboody served as Yield and Integration Departments at Numonyx Ltd focusing on NOR flash memory process and reliability. In 2011, Mr. Aboody
managed the Engineering and Yield Departments at Micron Technology Ltd Fab12. In 2013, Mr. Aboody returned to Intel Corporation to manage
the Fab28 Yield Organization, responsible for CPU and SoC outgoing yield performance, defects and Labs. Mr. Aboody holds an Executive
MBA from Tel-Aviv University, Israel and a B.Sc. in Materials Engineering from Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Israel.
Dr. Thomas Schütt
was appointed General Manager of our Chemical Metrology Division and Managing Director of our German
subsidiary in April 2023. Before joining Nova, Dr. Schütt held various leading positions in the wafer technology and application
field of Siltronic AG, a leading German manufacturer of silicon wafers for the semiconductor industry. From 2009 until 2013, Dr. Schütt
served as a global account manager of Siltronic US, and from 2013 to 2019 he was leading the Taiwan and China business as the VP Sales
and Managing Director of Siltronic Taiwan and China. In his last role he served as Corp. VP Application Technology International of Siltronic
AG from 2019 to 2023. Since April 2025, Dr. Schütt is, in addition to his role as GM for the Chemical Metrology division, also serving
as General Manager of Sentronics, a Nova company. Dr. Schütt holds a Ph.D. in Chemistry from the Ludwig-Maximilian University Munich,
Germany.
Voting Agreement
We are not aware of any voting agreement currently
in effect.
6.B
Compensation
The aggregate compensation expensed, including
share-based compensation and other compensation expensed by us, to our board and senior management members listed in Item 6.A in this
Annual Report, with respect to the year ended December 31, 2025 (consisting of 13 persons) was approximately $13 million. This amount
includes approximately $0.4 million set aside or accrued to provide pension, severance, retirement, or similar benefits and amounts expensed
by the Company for automobiles made available to its executive officers).
Disclosure regarding the compensation of our
senior executives on an individual basis will be disclosed in our proxy statement in connection with the 2026 annual general meeting of
shareholders in accordance with Israeli regulations.
Terms of employment of Mr. Gabriel Waisman,
as were approved by our shareholders at the 2024 annual general meeting of shareholders, and amended by our shareholders at the 2025 annual
general meeting of shareholders are as follows:
General
(i) a monthly base salary of NIS 120,000
(approximately, $32,600), effective as of June 1, 2024 through June 2025 following which, the monthly base salary was increased to NIS
131,500 (approximately $36,000); (ii) an annual bonus of up to twelve (12) monthly base salaries for 100% achievement (with additional
payment of up to twelve (12) monthly salaries in the case of overachievement), subject to objectives which are annually predetermined
by our board of directors and the compensation committee, in accordance with our compensation policy; (iii) in the event of termination
of employment (other than for cause), Mr. Waisman will be entitled to a six months advance notice, during which he will be entitled to
all of his compensation components, including the continued vesting of his equity awards. In the event of termination of employment not
for cause, the annual bonus will be prorated (subject to certain adjustments); (iv) customary social benefits such as pension fund or
management insurance, education fund, vacation pay, sick leave and convalescence pay; (v) subject to required approvals under applicable
law, a directors and officers' insurance, including a “run-off” insurance policy; and (vi) monthly travel expenses or a Company
car (deducted out of the gross salary), cellular phone, a land line phone, toll road expenses, a laptop computer, annual medical check-up
and other expense reimbursements pursuant to the Company general policies as applicable from time to time.
Equity-Based Compensation
On June 1, 2023, per the approval at the 2023
annual general meeting of shareholders, Mr. Waisman was granted a total of 12,000 restricted share units that vest over a period of four
(4) years, in equal annual installments, unless such restricted share units have been cancelled in accordance with the terms and conditions
of the share incentive plan of the Company or the employment terms of Mr. Waisman. In addition, Mr. Waisman was granted with 12,000 performance-based
restricted units that vest over a period of four (4) years, in four equal annual installments, provided that the Company meets or exceeds
the non-GAAP operating profit as set forth in the Company's budget as approved by the board of directors for the fiscal year preceding
the date of vesting, unless such performance share units have been cancelled in accordance with the terms and conditions of the share
incentive plan of the Company or the employment terms of Mr. Waisman. In the event a portion of the performance share units fails to vest,
such portion will be carried forward to the fourth vesting date and will vest if the Company’s average annual return on equity based
on net income during the previous four (4) years will be no less than ten percent (10%).
On July 1, 2024, per the approval at the 2024
annual general meeting of shareholders, Mr. Waisman was granted an additional 5,930 restricted share units that vest over a period of
four (4) years, in equal annual installments, unless such restricted share units have been cancelled in accordance with the terms and
conditions of the share incentive plan of the Company or the employment terms of Mr. Waisman. In addition, Mr. Waisman was granted with
5,930 performance-based restricted units that vest over a period of four (4) years, in four equal annual installments, provided with respect
to 50% of the units, the Company meets or exceeds the revenue budget as set forth in the Company’s budget as approved by the board
of directors for the fiscal year preceding the date of vesting, and with respect to the other 50% of the units, provided that the Company
meets or exceeds the non-GAAP operating profit as set forth in the Company's budget as approved by the board of directors for the fiscal
year preceding the date of vesting unless such performance share units have been cancelled in accordance with the terms and conditions
of the share incentive plan of the Company or the employment terms of Mr. Waisman. In the event a portion of the performance share units
fails to vest, such portion will be carried forward to the fourth vesting date and will vest if the Company’s average annual return
on equity based on net income during the previous four (4) years will be no less than ten percent (10%).
On July 1, 2025, per the approval at the 2025
annual general meeting of shareholders, Mr. Waisman was granted an additional 6,710 restricted share units that vest over a period of
four (4) years, in equal annual installments, unless such restricted share units have been cancelled in accordance with the terms and
conditions of the share incentive plan of the Company or the employment terms of Mr. Waisman. In addition, Mr. Waisman was granted with
6,710 performance-based restricted units that vest over a period of four (4) years, in four equal annual installments, provided with respect
to 50% of the units, the Company meets or exceeds the revenue budget as set forth in the Company’s budget as approved by the board
of directors for the fiscal year preceding the date of vesting, and with respect to the other 50% of the units, provided that the Company
meets or exceeds the non-GAAP operating profit as set forth in the Company's budget as approved by the board of directors for the fiscal
year preceding the date of vesting unless such performance share units have been cancelled in accordance with the terms and conditions
of the share incentive plan of the Company or the employment terms of Mr. Waisman. In the event a portion of the performance share units
fails to vest, such portion will be carried forward to the fourth vesting date and will vest if the Company’s average annual return
on equity based on net income during the previous four (4) years will be no less than ten percent (10%).
Compensation upon Significant
Event
In the event that prior to the completion of the
vesting of equity awards granted to Mr. Waisman an acquisition of the Company or asset transfer of all or substantially all the assets
of the Company (collectively, “M&A Event”) will occur while Mr. Waisman is employed by the Company and holds the position
of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer & President, then immediately prior to, and contingent upon, the closing of such M&A
Event, all of Mr. Waisman unvested equity awards will become fully vested and exercisable, or substituted for equity awards in a successor
company.
In the event an M&A Event will occur while
Mr. Waisman is employed by the Company and holds the position of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer & President, the compensation
committee and the Board may grant to Mr. Waisman a special bonus of up to 12 monthly salaries.
Compensation upon Acquisition
In the event the Company acquires another business
(whether by merger, share or asset purchase) while Mr. Waisman is employed by the Company and holds the position of the Company’s
Chief Executive Officer & President, Mr. Waisman may be granted a special bonus of up to 12 monthly salaries, subject to the compensation
committee and board of director's discretion. In accordance with this entitlement, on February 2025 our compensation committee and board
approved a bonus of 12 monthly salaries for the acquisition of Sentronics which was paid to Mr. Waisman in April 2025.
Directors and Officers
Equity Based Compensation
As of February 5, 2026, a total of 4,010 options
to purchase our ordinary shares and 87,667 RSU’s were outstanding and held by certain directors and senior management members listed
in Item 6.A in this Annual Report (consisting of 13 persons), of which 4,010 options are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60
days of February 5, 2026. 47,824 shares are held by trustee due to vested RSUs and 607 RSU’s will vest within 60 days of February
5, 2026. See “Item 6E. Share Ownership” in this Annual Report.
In accordance with our current equity-based compensation
policy, the exercise price of granted options is equal to the closing sale price of the Company's ordinary shares on Nasdaq on the day
of grant.
Compensation of Directors
The compensation scheme for our non-executive
directors (other than the chairperson of the board of directors), which does not include any pay per meeting, as approved by our shareholders
in June 2025, is as follows:
(i) an annual payment of $60,000 with additional
annual payment for service on board committees as follows: $12,000 (or $20,000 for the chairperson) for each member of the audit committee;
$12,000 (or $18,000 for the chairperson) for each member of the compensation committee; and $8,500 (or $12,500 for the chairperson) for
each member of the nominating committee or any other Board Committee; and (b) for services as the chairperson of our Board, an additional
$60,000; provided, that in the event payments are made in NIS, the amounts will be calculated
on the average exchange rate;
(ii) in the event of a director appointed by
our board of directors, a one-time equity award of restricted share units of $255,000 which will vest annually over a period of three
(3) years (subject to such director’s continued service through such date); and
(iii) an equity award of restricted share units,
on an annual basis on the date of the annual general meeting of the Company’s shareholders (subject to such director’s continued
service) at a value of $192,000 (or $600,000 for the chairperson of the Board), which will vest on the first anniversary of the date of
grant, subject to such director’s continued service through such date; provided, however,
that the director must have served on the Board for at least one (1) year prior to the date of the annual general meeting of the Company’s
shareholders in order to be eligible for such award; and
(iv) a director whose service as a director
ends (other than in the case the director is removed by the Company’s shareholders or disqualified under the Companies Law) following
at least eight (8) years of directorship will be entitled to the acceleration of vesting of any equity awards, including options and restricted
share units, subject to vesting within three (3) months of his or her last date of service, so such equity awards will be fully vested
as of such date.
On June 18, 2025, our shareholders approved
our current compensation policy.
The full text of our current compensation
policy is filed hereto as Exhibit 4.3 and is incorporated by reference. Furthermore, following the SEC approval of Nasdaq’s proposed
clawback listing standards, under Rule 10D-1 (the “Clawback Listing Rules”), which directed companies to adopt and comply
with a written clawback policy, to disclose and file the policy as an exhibit to its annual report, we adopted as of October 2, 2023,
a clawback policy as contemplated pursuant to the Clawback Listing Rules, as filed as Exhibit 97 to the 2023 Annual Report and is incorporated
by reference.
6.C
Board Practices
Our Amended and Restated Articles of Association,
as adopted by the Company’s shareholders on June 20, 2024, or the Articles, provide that we may have between five and nine directors.
Our board of directors currently consists of seven directors, two of which are female directors.
Under the Companies Law, companies incorporated
under the laws of the State of Israel that are “public companies,” including companies with shares listed on the Nasdaq Global
Select Market, are required to appoint at least two external directors.
Pursuant to regulations promulgated under the
Companies Law, companies with shares traded on a U.S. stock exchange, including the Nasdaq Global Select Market, may, subject to certain
conditions, “opt out” from the Companies Law requirements to appoint external directors and related Companies Law rules concerning
the composition of the audit committee and compensation committee of the board of directors. In accordance with these regulations, in
May 2018, we elected to “opt out” from the Companies Law requirements to appoint external directors and related Companies
Law rules concerning the composition of the audit committee and compensation committee of the board of directors.
Under these regulations, the exemptions from such
Companies Law requirements will continue to be available to us so long as: (i) we do not have a “controlling shareholder”
(as such term is defined under the Companies Law), (ii) our shares are traded on a U.S. stock exchange, including the Nasdaq Global
Select Market, and (iii) we comply with the director independence requirements, the audit committee and the compensation committee
composition requirements, under U.S. laws (including applicable Nasdaq Rules) applicable to U.S. domestic issuers.
Our board of directors has determined that all
of our directors, except for Mr. Oppenhaim, qualify as ‘‘independent directors’’ as defined by the Nasdaq Stock
Market Rules.
Our Articles provide that directors
may be elected at our annual general meeting of shareholders by a vote of the holders of more than 50% of the total number of votes represented
at such meeting, not taking into consideration abstention votes. In addition, our board of directors is authorized to appoint directors,
at its discretion, provided that the total number of directors does not exceed the maximum number of directors permitted by the Articles.
Our directors serve as such until the next annual general meeting of our shareholders.
According to the Companies Law, the board of directors
of a public company must establish the minimum number of board members that are to have accounting and financial expertise while considering,
inter alia, the nature of the company, its size, the scope and complexity of its operations and
the number of directors stated in the Articles.
Our board of directors resolved that the minimum
number of board members that need to have accounting and financial expertise is one (1).
Our board of directors determined that Ms. Sarit
Sagiv has accounting and financial expertise as described in the regulations promulgated pursuant to the Companies Law, and that, therefore,
the requirement of the minimum number of board members that need to have accounting and financial expertise, as set by the board of directors,
has been met.
Our board of directors has adopted a training
program for newly appointed directors. Once appointed and following the completion of their onboard training, our directors continue to
receive ongoing training as part of our directors training and development efforts.
Family Relationships
There are no family relationships between
any members of our executive management and our directors.
Board of Directors’ Committees
The Company’s board of directors has
appointed the following committees:
Audit Committee
Our Audit Committee is comprised of Sarit Sagiv
(Chairperson), Zehava Simon and Avi Cohen. The audit committee is responsible to provide oversight of the accounting and financial reporting
process of the Company and the audits of the financial statements of the Company, and assist the Board in its oversight of (i) the integrity
of the Company's financial statements and other published financial information, (ii) the Company's compliance with applicable financial
and accounting related standards, rules and regulations, (iii) the selection, engagement and termination, subject to shareholder approval,
of the Company's independent auditor, (iv) the pre-approval of all audit, audit-related and all permitted non-audit services, if any,
by the Company's independent auditor, and the compensation therefor, (v) the Company's internal controls over financial reporting, and
(vi) risk assessment and risk management, including cyber risks.
Under the Companies Law, the audit committee
is responsible, among others, for (i) identifying deficiencies in the business management practices of the Company, including by consulting
with the internal auditor, and recommending remedial actions with respect to such deficiencies; (ii) reviewing and approving related party
transactions, including, among others, determining whether or not such transactions are deemed material actions or extraordinary transactions;
(iii) ensuring that a competitive process is conducted for related party transactions with a controlling shareholder (regardless of whether
or not such transactions are deemed extraordinary transactions), optionally based on criteria which may be determined by the audit committee
annually in advance; (iv) setting forth the approval process for transactions that are 'non-negligible' (i.e., transactions with a controlling
shareholder that are classified by the audit committee as non-negligible, even though they are not deemed extraordinary transactions),
as well as determining which types of transactions would require the approval of the audit committee, optionally based on criteria which
may be determined annually in advance by the audit committee; (v) evaluating the Company’s internal audit program and the performance
of the Company’s internal auditor and the resources at his/her disposal; (vi) reviewing the scope of work of the Company’s
external auditor and making recommendations regarding his/her salary; and (vii) creating procedures relating to the employees’ complaints
regarding deficiencies in the administration of the Company as well as adopting against retaliation. The audit committee is also responsible
for reviewing and approving any material change or waiver in the Company's Corporate Code of Conduct regarding directors or executive
officers, and disclosures made in the Company's annual report in such regard. The audit committee operates under a charter duly adopted
by the board of directors.
Our board of directors has determined that
each member of our audit committee is independent as such term is defined in Rule 10A‑3 under the Exchange Act, and that each
member of our audit committee satisfies the additional requirements applicable under the Nasdaq rules to members of an audit committee.
Our audit committee also acts as our investment
committee, monitoring our cash reserves investment policy.
Compensation Committee
Our Compensation
Committee is comprised of Zehava Simon (Chairperson), Avi Cohen, Raanan Cohen and Sarit Sagiv. The function of the compensation committee
is described in the approved charter of the committee and includes assisting the board of directors in discharging its responsibilities
relating to compensation of the Company’s officers, directors and executives and the overall compensation programs and reviewing
and approving, or if required by law, approving and recommending for approval by the board of directors, grants and awards under the Company’s
equity incentive plans. The primary objective of the committee is to oversee the development and implementation of the compensation policies
and plans that are appropriate for the Company in light of all relevant circumstances, and which provide incentives that fit the Company’s
long-term strategic plans and are consistent with the culture of the Company and the overall goal of enhancing shareholder’s value.
Our board of directors has determined that
each member of our compensation committee is independent under the Nasdaq rules, including the additional independence requirements applicable
to the members of a compensation committee.
Under the Companies Law and our compensation
committee charter, our compensation committee is responsible, among others, for (i) recommending to the board of directors regarding its
approval of a compensation policy in accordance with the requirements of the Companies Law, and any other compensation policies, incentive-based
compensation plans and equity-based plans; (ii) overseeing the development and implementation of such compensation plans and policies
that are appropriate in light of all relevant circumstances and recommending to the board of directors regarding any amendments or modifications
that the compensation committee deems appropriate; (iii) determining whether to approve transactions concerning the terms of engagement
and employment of our officers and directors that require compensation committee approval under the Companies Law or our compensation
plans and policies; (iv) oversees the administration of our clawback policy with respect to executive compensation, in line with our charter,
including as required pursuant to SEC and Nasdaq rules; and (v) taking any further actions as the compensation committee is required or
allowed to under the Companies Law or the compensation plans and policies.
Nominating Governance and
Sustainability Committee
Our Nominating Governance
and Sustainability Committee is comprised of Raanan Cohen (Chairperson), Zehava Simon and Yaniv Garty. The function of the nominating
committee is described in the approved charter of the committee and includes responsibility for identifying individuals qualified to become
board members and recommending that the board of directors consider the director nominees for election at the general meeting of shareholders.
In June 2022, our board of directors expanded the committee’s responsibilities to also include recommending to the board of directors
on governance matters and for developing and recommending to our board of directors business conduct and ethics guidelines, applicable
to the Company, including overseeing the Company’s policies, programs and strategies related to environmental, social and governance
(“ESG”) matters, periodically reviewing such guidelines and recommending any changes thereto, and overseeing the evaluation
of our board of directors and management.
Strategy and M&A Committee
In August 2023, our board of directors established
our Strategy and M&A Committee, which is comprised of Yaniv Garty (Chairperson), Eitan
Oppenhaim, Avi Cohen, Zehava Simon and Rami Hadar. The function of the strategy and M&A committee is described in the approved charter
of the committee, and includes responsibility for providing the board of directors with recommendations, in relation to: (i) the development
and execution of the Company’s strategy, including its strategic plans and initiatives; and (ii) the identification and analysis
of acquisition, merger, joint venture, and investment opportunities. The committee shall also maintain a cooperative, interactive planning
process with management, including but not limited to, identifying and prioritizing strategic goals.
All committees are acting according to written
charters that were approved by our board of directors. Additionally, we adopted an internal enforcement plan which was approved by our
board of directors. The internal enforcement plan, as part of which we adopted and implementing procedures and policies in order to comply
with the provisions of the Israeli Securities Law, 5728-1968 (the “Israeli Securities Law”), the Companies Law, and the regulations
promulgated thereunder. The internal enforcement plan includes, among others, the board committees’ charters and the internal auditor
charter, procedures with respect to related party transactions, insider trading, which prohibits hedging activities, equity-based compensation
policy, reporting and complaints, anti-bribery and anti-fraud policies and a code of conduct. Each of our committees has the power to
retain, terminate and approve the related fees and other retention terms, as it deems appropriate, outside counsel and other experts and
consultants to assist the committee in connection with its responsibilities without our board of directors’ approval and at the
Company's expense.
Approval of Related Party
Transaction
The Companies Law requires that office holders
of a company, including directors and executive officers, promptly disclose to the board of directors any personal interest they may have
and all related material information known to them about any existing or proposed transaction with such company. The approval of the board
of directors is required for 'non-extraordinary' transactions between a company and its office holders, or between a company and other
persons in which an office holder has a personal interest, unless such company's articles of association provide otherwise. Under the
Companies Law, a 'non-extraordinary' transaction between a company or between the company and a third party in which an office holder
of a company has a personal interest, will require the approval of the board of directors or a committee authorized by the board of directors,
unless such company's articles of association provide otherwise. Our Articles do not provide otherwise, and therefore such transaction
requires the approval of our board of directors. If a transaction is an “extraordinary transaction”, it is subject to the
approval of the audit committee prior to its approval by the board of directors. For information regarding the necessary approvals under
the Companies Law for transactions with office holders and directors regarding their terms of engagement with the company, see “—
Compensation of Officers and Directors” in this Item below.
In addition, an extraordinary transaction between
a public company and a controlling shareholder (i.e. a shareholder who has the ability to direct the activities of a company, including
a shareholder that owns 25% or more of the voting rights if no other shareholder owns more than 50% of the voting rights, but excluding
a shareholder whose power derives solely from its position on the board of directors or any other position with the company), or in which
a controlling shareholder has a personal interest, including a private placement in which the controlling shareholder has a personal interest,
a transaction between a public company and a controlling shareholder, the controlling shareholders' relative, or entities under its control,
directly or indirectly, with respect to services to be provided to the public company, and a transaction concerning the terms of compensation
of the controlling shareholder or the controlling shareholder’s relative, who is an office holder or an employee, requires the approval
of the audit committee or, in some cases, the compensation committee (see "— Compensation of Officers and Directors" in this Item
below), the board of directors and a majority of the shares voted by the shareholders of the company participating and voting on the matter
in a shareholders’ meeting. In addition, the shareholder approval must fulfill one of the following requirements: (i) the majority
must include at least a majority of the shares of the voting shareholders who have no personal interest in the transaction (in counting
the total votes of such shareholders, abstentions are not taken into account); or (ii) the total of opposition votes among the shareholders
who have no personal interest in the transaction may not exceed 2% of the aggregate voting rights in the company. Any such transaction
the term of which is more than three years, must be approved in the same manner every three years, unless with respect to certain transactions
as permitted by the Companies Law, the audit committee has determined that longer term is reasonable under the circumstances.
According to the Companies Law, if an extraordinary
transaction is discussed by the board of directors or the audit committee, directors and office holders that have personal interest in
the proposed transaction, may not participate in the discussion or vote. However, if the majority of the members of the audit committee
or the board of directors (as applicable) have personal interest in the proposed transaction, then all directors (including those with
personal interest) may participate in the discussion and vote, provided that in the event the majority of the members of the board of
directors have personal interest in the transaction, said transaction will also be subject to the approval of the Company's shareholders.
Compensation of Officers and
Directors
Under the Companies Law, Israeli public companies
are required to establish a compensation committee and adopt a policy regarding the compensation and terms of employment of their directors
and officers. For information on the composition, roles and objectives of the compensation committee pursuant to the Companies Law and
our compensation committee charter, see above “—Board of Directors’ Committees — Compensation Committee" in this
Annual Report.
Pursuant to the Companies Law, the compensation
policy must be approved by the company's board of directors after reviewing the recommendations of the compensation committee. The compensation
policy also requires the approval of the general meeting of the shareholders, which approval must satisfy one of the following (the "Majority
Requirement"): (i) the majority should include at least a majority of the shares of the voting shareholders who are non-controlling shareholders
or do not have a personal interest in the approval of the compensation policy (in counting the total votes of such shareholders, abstentions
are not be taken into account) or (ii) the total number of votes against the proposal among the shareholders mentioned in paragraph (i)
does not exceed two percent of the aggregate voting power in the company. Under certain circumstances and subject to certain exceptions,
the board of directors may approve the compensation policy despite the objection of the shareholders, provided that both the compensation
committee and the board of directors determine that it is for the benefit of the company, following an additional discussion and based
on detailed arguments.
The Companies Law provides that the compensation
policy must be re-approved (and re-considered) every three years, in the manner described above. Moreover, the board of directors is responsible
for reviewing from time to time the compensation policy and deciding whether or not there are any circumstances that require an adjustment
to the company's compensation policy. When approving the compensation policy, the relevant organs must take into consideration the goals
and objectives listed in the Companies Law, and include reference to specific issues listed in the Companies Law. Such issues include,
among others (the “Compensation Policy Mandatory Criteria”): (i) the relevant person’s education, qualifications, professional
experience and achievements; (ii) such person's position within the company, the scope of his responsibilities and previous compensation
arrangements with the company; (iii) the proportionality of the employer cost of such person in relation to the employer cost of other
employees of the company, and in particular, the average and median pay of other employees in the company, including contract workers,
and the impact of the differences between such person's compensation and the other employees' compensation on the labor relations in the
company; (iv) the authority, at the board of director's sole discretion, to lower any variable compensation components or set a maximum
limit (cap) on the actual value of the non-cash variable components, when paid; and (v) in the event that the terms of engagement include
any termination payments - the term of employment of the departing person, the company’s performance during that term, and the departing
person’s contribution to the performance of the company.
In addition, the Companies Law provides that the
following matters must be included in the compensation policy (the "Compensation Policy Mandatory Provisions"): (i) the award of variable
components must be based on long term and measurable performance criteria (other than non-material variable components, which may be based
on non-measurable criteria taking into account the relevant person's contribution to the performance of the company); (ii) the company
must set a ratio between fixed and variable pay, set a cap on the payment of any cash variable compensation components as of the payment
of such components, and set a cap on the maximum cash value all non-cash variable components as of their grant date; (iii) the compensation
policy must include a provision requiring the relevant person to return to the company any compensation that was awarded on the basis
of financial figures that were subsequently restated; (iv) equity based variable compensation components should have an appropriate minimum
vesting periods, which should be linked to long term performance objectives; and (v) the company must set a clear limit on termination
payments.
Furthermore, our Compensation Policy contains
a compensation recovery provision which enables us under certain circumstances to recover bonuses paid in excess due to an accounting
restatement, allows our chief executive officer to approve immaterial changes in the terms of employment of executive officers, provided
such changes are in accordance with our Compensation Policy, and enables us to exculpate, indemnify and insure our directors and executive
officers subject to certain limitations as set forth therein.
Pursuant to the Companies Law, any transaction
with an office holder (except directors and the chief executive officer of the company) with respect to such office holder's compensation
arrangements and terms of engagement, requires the approval of the compensation committee and the board of directors. Such transaction
must be consistent with the provisions of the company's compensation policy, provided that the compensation committee and the board of
directors may, under special circumstances, approve such transaction that is not in accordance with the company's compensation policy,
if both of the following conditions are met: (i) the compensation committee and the board of directors discussed the transaction in light
of the roles and objectives of the compensation committee (also see above "—Board of Directors' Committees — Compensation
Committee" in this Annual Report) and after taking into consideration the Compensation Policy Mandatory Criteria and including in such
transaction the Compensation Policy Mandatory Provisions; and (ii) the company's shareholders approved the transaction, provided that
in public companies the approval must satisfy the Majority Requirement. Notwithstanding the above, the compensation committee and the
board of directors may, under special circumstances, approve such transaction even if the shareholders' meeting objected to its approval,
provided that (i) both the compensation committee and the board of directors re-discussed the transactions and decided to approve it despite
the shareholder's objection, based on detailed arguments, and (ii) the company is not a 'Public Pyramid Held Company'. For the purpose
hereof, a "Public Pyramid Held Company" is a public company that is controlled by another public company (including companies that issued
only debentures to the public), which is also controlled by another public company (including companies that issued only debentures to
the public) that has a controlling shareholder.
Transactions between public companies (including
companies that have issued only debentures to the public) and their chief executive officer, with respect to his or her compensation arrangement
and terms of engagement, require the approval of the compensation committee, the board of directors and the shareholder's meeting, provided
that the approval of the shareholders' meeting must satisfy the Majority Requirement. Notwithstanding the above, the compensation committee
and the board of directors may, under special circumstances, approve such transaction with the chief executive officer even if the shareholders'
meeting objected to its approval, provided that (i) both the compensation committee and the board of directors re-discussed the transactions
and decided to approve it despite the shareholder's objection, based on detailed arguments, and (ii) the company is not a Public Pyramid
Held Company. Such transaction with the chief executive officer must be consistent with the provisions of the company's compensation policy,
provided that the compensation committee and the board of directors may, under special circumstances, approve such transaction that is
not in accordance with the company's compensation policy, if both of the following conditions are met: (i) the compensation committee
and the board of directors discussed the transaction in light of the roles and objectives of the compensation committee (see above —“Board
of Directors' Committees – Compensation Committee" in this Annual Report) and after taking into consideration the Compensation Policy
Mandatory Criteria and including in such transaction the Compensation Policy Mandatory Provisions; and (ii) the company's shareholders
approved the transaction, provided that in public companies the approval must satisfy the Majority Requirement. In addition, the compensation
committee may determine that such transaction with the chief executive officer of the company does not have to be approved by the shareholders
of the company, provided that: (i) the chief executive officer is independent based on criteria set forth in the Companies Law; (ii) the
compensation committee determined, based on detailed arguments, that bringing the transaction to the approval of the shareholders may
compromise the chances of entering into the transaction; and (iii) the terms of the transaction are consistent with the provisions of
the company's compensation policy. Under the Companies Law, non-material amendments of transactions relating to the compensation arrangement
or terms of engagement of office holders (including the chief executive officer), require only the approval of the compensation committee.
With respect to transactions relating to the compensation
arrangement and terms of engagements of directors in public companies (including companies that have issued only debentures to the public),
the Companies Law provides that such transaction is subject to the approval of the compensation committee, the board of directors and
the shareholders' meeting. Such transaction must be consistent with the provisions of the company's compensation policy, provided that
the compensation committee and the board of directors may, under special circumstances, approve such transaction that is not in accordance
with the company's compensation policy, if both of the following conditions are met: (i) the compensation committee and the board of directors
discussed the transaction in light of the roles and objectives of the compensation committee (see above "—Board Practices –Board
of Directors' Committees – Compensation Committee" in this Annual Report) and after taking into consideration the Compensation Policy
Mandatory Criteria and including in such transaction the Compensation Policy Mandatory Provisions; and (ii) the company's shareholders
approved the transaction, provided that in public companies the approval must satisfy the Majority Requirement.
Pursuant to the Companies Law, a compensation
policy must be re-approved (and re-considered) at least once every three years. The current compensation policy was approved by our shareholders
on June 18, 2025.
Internal Auditor
Under the Companies Law, the board of directors
must also appoint an internal auditor nominated by the audit committee. Our internal auditor is Ms. Sharon Cohen, CPA (Isr.) of Deloitte
Brightman Almagor, an independent registered accounting firm which is a part of the Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited accounting firm.
The role of the internal auditor is to examine whether a company’s actions comply with the law and proper business procedure. The
internal auditor may not be an interested party or office holder, or a relative of any interested party or office holder, and may not
be a member of the company’s independent accounting firm or its representative. The Companies Law defines an interested party as
a holder of 5% or more of the shares or voting rights of a company, any person or entity that has the right to nominate or appoint at
least one director or the general manager of the company or any person who serves as a director or as the general manager of a company.
Our internal auditor is working based on a risk survey and audit plan, which is determined by our audit committee and approved by our
board of directors.
6.D
Employees
Set forth below is a chart showing the number
of people we employed at the times indicated:
|
As of December 31, |
|
2023 |
|
|
2024 |
|
|
2025 |
|
|
Total Personnel |
|
|
1,202 |
|
|
|
1,383 |
|
|
|
1,612 |
|
|
Located in Israel |
|
|
516 |
|
|
|
586 |
|
|
|
604 |
|
|
Located abroad |
|
|
686 |
|
|
|
797 |
|
|
|
1,008 |
|
|
In operations |
|
|
287 |
|
|
|
293 |
|
|
|
344 |
|
|
In research and development |
|
|
477 |
|
|
|
585 |
|
|
|
682 |
|
|
In global business |
|
|
318 |
|
|
|
375 |
|
|
|
449 |
|
|
In general and administration |
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
130 |
|
|
|
137 |
|
The numbers of employees set forth in this table do not include contractors
but includes an insignificant number of temporary employees retained by the Company from time to time.
In the high-tech industry in general and specifically
in the semiconductors industry, there is intense competition for high-skilled employees. We believe that the company’s future success
will depend, by a large part, on our continued ability to attract, hire and retain qualified and highly motivated employees in every role
and seniority level.
Under applicable Israeli law, we and our employees
are subject to protective labor provisions such as restrictions on working hours, minimum wages, paid vacation, sick pay, severance pay
and advance notice of termination of employment as well as equal opportunity and anti-discrimination laws. Orders issued by the Israeli
Ministry of Economy and Industry make certain industry-wide collective bargaining agreements applicable to us. These agreements affect
matters such as cost of living adjustments to salaries, length of working hours and week, recuperation and travel expenses. In Israel,
we are subject to the instructions of the Extension Order in the Industrial Field for Extensive Pension Insurance 2006 according to the
Israeli Collective Bargaining Agreements Law, 1957 (the “Extension Order”). The Extension Order determines the pension terms
of the employees which fall under its criteria.
6.E
Share Ownership
Based on information provided to us, our 13
directors and senior management members listed in Item 6.A in this Annual Report, have had, as a group, sole voting and investment power
for 52,441 shares beneficially owned by them as of February 5, 2026 (representing approximately 0.2% of the 31,782,972 issued and outstanding
ordinary shares of our company as of such date). Such number includes 4,010 shares subject to options that are immediately exercisable
or exercisable within 60 days of February 5, 2026 (with expiration dates ranging between 2026 and 2029; exercise prices ($/share) ranging
between $48.20 and $102.35), 47,824 shares held by the trustee due to vested RSUs, and 607 RSUs to be vested within 60 days as of February
5, 2026.
Beneficial ownership of shares is determined in
accordance with the rules of the SEC and generally includes any shares over which a person exercises sole or shared voting or investment
power. Ordinary shares that are subject to warrants or options that are presently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of the date
of February 5, 2026 are deemed to be outstanding and beneficially owned by the person holding the options for the purpose of computing
the percentage ownership of that person, but are not treated as outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage of any other person.
Employee Benefit Plans
The share option plan under which we have outstanding equity grants,
are described below:
2017 Share Incentive Plan - The maximum number
of ordinary shares to be issued under the plan, which was adopted by our board of directors on August 1, 2017, is 2,500,000, subject to
future increases or decreases by the Company. As of December 31, 2025, options to purchase 635,877 ordinary shares at an exercise prices
which range from $ 22.56 to $ 102.35, the closing price of the Company's ordinary shares on Nasdaq on the day of grant, were granted under
this plan of which, as of December 31, 2025, 369,655 options were exercised, 12,879 options were outstanding and exercisable, 253,343
options had been cancelled and no options were outstanding and unvested. As of December 31, 2025, 1,663,298 RSU’s had been granted,
of which 1,110,091 RSU’s had vested, 156,945 had been cancelled and 396,262 RSU's were outstanding.
On June 18, 2025, our shareholders (following
approval by our compensation committee and board of directors), approved the Company's compensation policy, which includes, among others,
provisions relating to equity-based compensation for Nova's executive officers.
The compensation policy provides, among others,
that: (i) such equity based compensation is intended to be in a form of share options and/or other equity based awards, such as RSUs,
in accordance with the Company's equity incentive plan in place as may be updated from time to time; (ii) all equity-based incentives
granted to executive officers will be subject to vesting periods in order to promote long-term retention of the awarded executive officers.
Unless determined otherwise in a specific award agreement approved by the compensation committee and the board of directors, grants to
executive officers (other than directors) will vest gradually over a period of between three to five years; and (iii) all other terms
of the equity awards will be in accordance with Nova's incentive plans and other related practices and policies. The board of directors
may, following approval by the compensation committee, extend the period of time for which an award is to remain exercisable and make
provisions with respect to the acceleration of the vesting period of any executive officer's awards, including, without limitation, in
connection with a corporate transaction involving a change of control, subject to any additional approval as may be required by the Companies
Law. The compensation policy also provides that the equity-based compensation will be granted from time to time and be individually determined
and awarded according to the performance, educational background, prior business experience, qualifications, role and the personal responsibilities
of the executive officer. The fair market value of the equity-based compensation for the executive officers will be determined according
to acceptable valuation practices at the time of grant. Our compensation policy provides that equity-based compensation awarded to employees,
executive officers or directors shall not be, in the aggregate, in excess of 10% of our share capital on a fully diluted basis at the
date of the grant.
Our equity-based compensation policy, provides,
among others, that the exercise price for each option will be equal to the closing sale price of the Company's ordinary shares on Nasdaq
on the day of grant.
For additional information regarding our employees’
incentive plans, see Note 14 of our consolidated financial statements, contained elsewhere in this Annual Report.
6.F
Disclosure of Registrant’s Action to Recover Erroneously Awarded Compensation.
Not applicable.
Item 7. Major
Shareholder and Related Party Transactions
7.A
Major Shareholders
The following table sets forth certain information
regarding the beneficial ownership of our outstanding ordinary shares as of the dates indicated below for each shareholder who we know
beneficially owns five percent or more of the outstanding ordinary shares.
Beneficial ownership of shares is determined under
rules of the SEC and generally includes any shares over which a person exercises sole or shared voting or investment power. Applicable
percentages are based on 31,782,972 ordinary shares outstanding as of February 5, 2026.
|
Name |
|
Number of Ordinary
Shares Beneficially
Owned |
|
|
Percentage of Ordinary
Shares
Beneficially Owned |
|
|
FMR LLC (1)
|
|
|
2,899,018 |
|
|
|
9.12 |
% |
|
Menora Mivtachim Holdings Ltd.
(2) |
|
|
2,095,542 |
|
|
|
6.59 |
% |
|
Migdal Insurance & Financial Holdings Ltd.
(3) |
|
|
2,377,339 |
|
|
|
7.48 |
% |
|
Harel Insurance Investments & Financial Services Ltd.
(4) |
|
|
3,153,440 |
|
|
|
9.92 |
% |
|
BlackRock, Inc. (5)
|
|
|
1,604,125 |
|
|
|
5.04 |
% |
|
|
(1) |
The information is based upon Amendment no. 5 to Schedule 13G/A filed
with the SEC by FMR LLC, and subsidiaries on August 6, 2025 regarding holdings as of June 30, 2025. |
|
|
(2) |
The information is based upon the shareholder notification provided
to the Company by Menora Mivtachim Holdings Ltd., Menora Mivtachim Pensions and Gemel Ltd., Menora Mivtahim Insurance Ltd., Menora Mivtachim
Vehistadrut Hamehandesim Nihul Kupot Gemel Ltd. and Shomera Insurance Company Ltd. on January 11, 2026 regarding holdings as of December
31, 2025. |
|
|
(3) |
The information is based upon Schedule 13G filed with the SEC by
Migdal Insurance & Financial Holdings Ltd., Migdal Insurance Company Ltd., Migdal Sal Domestic Equities, Migdal Mutual Funds Ltd.,
on November 13, 2025 regarding holdings as of September 30, 2025. |
|
|
(4) |
The information is based upon Amendment no. 12 Schedule 13G/A filed
with the SEC by Harel Insurance Investments & Financial Services Ltd. on February 9, 2026 regarding holdings as of February 5,
2026. |
| |
(5) |
The information is based upon the Schedule 13G filed with the SEC
by BlackRock, Inc. on October 17, 2025 regarding holds as of September 30, 2025. |
All the shareholders of the Company have the same voting rights.
To our knowledge, the significant changes in the
percentage of ownership held by our major shareholders during the past three years have been the decrease in the percentage of ownership
by Wasatch Advisors Inc. to below 5% in 2025, and the decrease of ownership of Clal Insurance Enterprises Holdings Ltd. to below 5% in
2025.
As of February 5, 2026, our ordinary shares were
held by 8 registered holders (not including CEDE & Co.). Based on the information provided to us by our transfer agent, as of February
5, 2026, 7 registered holders were U.S. domicile holders and held approximately 0.01% of our outstanding ordinary shares.
Control of Registrant
To the Company’s knowledge, it is not owned
or controlled by a foreign government. Except for the shareholders identified above owning more than five percent of the Company’s
ordinary shares, the Company has no knowledge of any corporation or other natural or legal person owning a controlling interest in the
Company.
7.B
Related Party Transactions
In November 2025, we obtained directors’
and officers’ liability insurance for our officers and directors with coverage in an aggregate amount of $85 million (including
$20 million Side A DIC). This directors’ and officers’ liability insurance was presented and approved by our compensation
committee in accordance with the framework under our compensation policy.
Our compensation policy authorizes the Company,
as long as the compensation policy is in effect, to extend and/or renew the directors’ and officers’ liability insurance or
enter into a new insurance policy, provided however, that the insurance transaction complies with the following conditions: (i) the limit
of liability of the insurer will not exceed the greater of $60 million or 30% of our shareholders equity based on our most recent financial
statements at the time of approval by the compensation committee; and (ii) the insurance policy, as well as the limit of liability and
the premium for each extension or renewal will be approved by the compensation committee (and, if required by law, by the board of directors)
which will determine that the sums are reasonable considering our exposures, the scope of coverage and the market conditions and that
the insurance policy reflects the current market conditions, and it will not materially affect our profitability, assets or liabilities.
Further, upon circumstances to be approved by
the compensation committee (and, if required by law, by the board of directors), we will be entitled to enter into a "run off" insurance
policy of up to seven years, with the same insurer or any other insurance, as follows: (i) the limit of liability of the insurer will
not exceed the greater of $60 million or 30% of our shareholders equity based on our most recent financial statements at the time of approval
by the compensation committee; and (ii) the insurance policy, as well as the limit of liability and the premium for each extension or
renewal will be approved by the compensation committee (and, if required by law, by the board of directors) which shall determine that
the sums are reasonable considering our exposures covered under such policy, the scope of cover and the market conditions, and that the
insurance policy reflects the current market conditions and that it will not materially affect our profitability, assets or liabilities.
We may also extend the insurance policy in place
to include cover for liability pursuant to a future public offering of securities. The insurance policy as well as the additional premium
should be approved by the compensation committee (and if required by law, by the board of directors) which will determine that the sums
are reasonable considering the exposures pursuant to such public offering of securities, the scope of cover and the market conditions
and that the insurance policy reflects the current market conditions, and it does not materially affect our profitability, assets or liabilities.
In addition, following the approval by our shareholders
at the annual general meeting held on June 24, 2021, we undertook to indemnify our officers and directors up to the greater of (a) twenty-five
percent (25%) of the Company’s total shareholders’ equity according to the Company’s most recent financial statements
as of the time of the actual payment of indemnification; (b) US$200 million; (c) ten percent (10%) of the Company "total market cap" (which
shall mean the average closing price of the Company’s ordinary shares over the 30 trading days prior to the actual payment of indemnification
multiplied by the total number of issued and outstanding shares of the Company as of the date of actual payment); and (d) in connection
with or arising out of a public offering of the Company’s securities, the aggregate amount of proceeds from the sale by the Company
and/or any shareholder of Company’s securities in such offering.
Following the approval by our shareholders at
the annual general meeting held on June 18, 2025, and as provided in our compensation policy, we have exempted our directors and officers
in advance for all or any of their liability for damage in consequence of a breach of the duty of care vis-a-vis our company, to the extent
permitted by applicable law.
Pursuant to our amended and restated compensation
policy, we may indemnify our directors and officers to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, for any liability and expense that
may be imposed on the director or the officer, as provided in the indemnity agreement between us and such individuals, all subject to
applicable law and our Amended and Restated Articles of Association.
For information relating to options granted
to officers and directors, see “Item 6E. Share Ownership” in this Annual Report. For information regarding our compensation
policy and compensation arrangements with our directors and executive officers (including our chairman and chief executive officer), please
refer to “Item 6B. Compensation” in this Annual Report.
7.C
Interest of Experts and Counsel
Not applicable.
Item 8. Financial
Information
8.A Consolidated Statements and Other
Financial Information
See “Item 17. Financial Statements”
in this Annual Report.
Legal Proceedings
From time to time, we or our subsidiaries may
be a party to legal proceedings and claims in the ordinary course of business. While the outcome of these matters cannot be predicted
with certainty, we do not believe they will have a material effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash
flows. We are currently not involved in any significant proceedings.
Dividend Policies
We anticipate that, for the foreseeable future,
we will retain any earnings to support operations and to finance the growth and development of our business. Therefore, we do not expect
to pay cash dividends for at least the next several years.
The distribution of dividends may be limited by
the Companies Law, which permits the distribution of dividends only out of retained earnings or earnings derived over the two most recent
fiscal years, whichever is higher, provided that there is no reasonable concern that payment of a dividend will prevent a company from
satisfying its existing and foreseeable obligations as they become due. Our Amended and Restated Articles of Association provide that
dividends will be paid at the discretion of, and upon resolution by, our board of directors.
In addition, distribution of dividends may be
subject to certain tax implications. For additional information regarding tax implication of dividends' distribution, see “Item
10E. Taxation – Israeli Taxation” in this Annual Report.
Export Sales
Substantially all of our products are sold to
customers located outside Israel.
8.B
Significant Changes
Not applicable.
Item 9. The
Offer and Listing
9.A
Offer and Listing Details
Our ordinary shares began trading on Nasdaq
on April 11, 2000 under the symbol “NVMI”. Our ordinary shares were registered for trading on the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange
Ltd. in 2002 under the symbol “נובה”.
9.B
Plan of Distribution
Not applicable.
9.C
Markets
Our ordinary shares are quoted on the Nasdaq Global
Select Market under the symbol “NVMI” and on the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange Ltd.
9.D
Selling Shareholders
Not applicable.
9.E
Dilution
Not applicable.
9.F
Expenses of the Issue
Not applicable.
Item 10.
Additional Information
10.A
Share Capital
Not applicable.
10.B
Memorandum and Articles of Association
A copy of our Amended and Restated Articles Of
Association is attached as Exhibit 1.1 to this Annual Report and is incorporated by reference to this Annual Report. The information called
for by this Item is set forth in Exhibit 2.1 to our annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2024, filed with the SEC
on February 20, 2025 (the “2024 Annual Report”) and is incorporated by reference to this Annual Report.
10.C
Material Contracts
Israeli Lease Agreement
A summary of our Israeli Lease Agreement has been
attached as Exhibit 4.7 to our 2022 Annual Report and is incorporated by reference to this Annual Report. See Note 12 to our consolidated
financial statements included within this Annual Report.
2030 Convertible Senior Notes
For a description of our issuance of our Convertible
Senior Notes due 2030, see Note 11 to our consolidated financial statements included within this Annual Report.
2020 Convertible Senior Notes
For a description of our issuance of our 2020
convertible notes, see Note 11 to our consolidated financial statements included within this Annual Report.
10.D
Exchange Controls
Israeli law and regulations do not impose any
material foreign exchange restrictions on non-Israeli holders of our ordinary shares.
Dividends, if any, paid to holders of our ordinary
shares, and any amounts payable upon our dissolution, liquidation or winding up, as well as the proceeds of any sale in Israel of our
ordinary shares to an Israeli resident, may be paid in non-Israeli currency or, if paid in Israeli currency, may be converted into freely
repatriable dollars at the rate of exchange prevailing at the time of conversion.
10.E
Taxation
Israeli Taxation
The following is a summary of the material Israeli
tax laws applicable to us, and some Israeli Government programs benefiting us. This section also contains a discussion of some Israeli
tax consequences to persons owning our ordinary shares. This summary does not discuss all the aspects of Israeli tax law that may be relevant
to a particular investor in light of his or her personal investment circumstances or to some types of investors subject to special treatment
under Israeli law. Examples of this kind of investor include, not for profit organizations, pension funds and other exempt institutional
investors, traders in securities, partnerships and other transparent entities, individuals under the tax regime for “new immigrants”
or “returning residents” and other taxpayers who are subject to special tax regimes not covered in this discussion. Some parts
of this discussion are based on a new tax legislation which has not been subject to judicial or administrative interpretation. The discussion
should not be construed as legal or professional tax advice and does not cover all possible tax considerations.
SHAREHOLDERS ARE URGED TO CONSULT THEIR OWN TAX
ADVISORS AS TO THE ISRAELI OR OTHER TAX CONSEQUENCES OF THE PURCHASE, OWNERSHIP AND DISPOSITION OF OUR ORDINARY SHARES, INCLUDING, IN
PARTICULAR, THE EFFECT OF ANY FOREIGN, STATE OR LOCAL TAXES.
General Corporate Tax Structure in Israel
Israeli companies are generally subject to corporate
tax on their taxable income at the rate of 23% for the 2018 tax year and thereafter. However, the effective tax rate payable by a company
that derives income from an Approved Enterprise, a Beneficiary Enterprise, a Preferred Enterprise, a Special Preferred Enterprise, a Preferred
Technology Enterprise or Special Preferred Technology Enterprise (as discussed below) may be lower. Capital gains derived by an Israeli
company are generally subject to the prevailing regular corporate tax rate.
Income
Tax Regulations (Rules on Bookkeeping by Foreign Invested Companies and Certain Partnerships and Determination of their Taxable Income),
1986
As a “foreign invested company” (as
defined in the Israeli Law for the Encouragement of Capital Investments-1959), the Company's management has elected to apply Income Tax
Regulations (Rules for Maintaining Accounting Records of Foreign Invested Companies and Certain Partnerships and Determining Their Taxable
Income) - 1986. Accordingly, its taxable income or loss is calculated in US Dollars.
Tax Benefits under the Law for the Encouragement
of Capital Investments, 1959
Tax benefits prior to
the 2005 Amendment
The Law for the Encouragement of Capital Investments,
1959, generally referred to as the “Investments Law”, provided (prior to the 2005 amendment) that a capital investment in
eligible facilities may, upon application to the Israeli Authority for Investments and Development of the Industry and Economy (the
“Investment Center”), be granted the status of an Approved Enterprise. Each certificate of approval for an Approved Enterprise
relates to a specific investment program delineated both by its financial scope, including sources or funds, and by its physical characteristics
or the facility or other assets, e.g., the equipment to be purchased and utilized pursuant to the program.
A company owning an Approved Enterprise is eligible
for a combination of grants and tax benefits (the “Grant Track”). The tax benefits under the Grant Track include, among others,
accelerated depreciation and amortization for tax purposes. The benefits period is ordinarily seven years commencing with the year in
which the Approved Enterprise first generates taxable income. The benefits period is limited to 12 years from the earlier of the
commencement of production by the Approved Enterprise or 14 years from the date of approval of the Approved Enterprise.
A company owning an Approved Enterprise may elect
to forego its entitlements to grants and tax benefits under the Grant Track and apply for alternative package of tax benefits for a benefit
period of between seven and ten years (the “Alternative Track”). Under the Alternative Track, a company’s undistributed
income derived from the Approved Enterprise will be exempt from corporate tax for a period of between two and ten years, starting from
the first year the company derives taxable income under the Approved Enterprise program. The length of this exemption will depend on the
geographic location of the Approved Enterprise within Israel. After the exemption period lapses, the company shall be subject to tax at
a reduced corporate tax rate between of 10% to 25% depending on the level of foreign investment in the company in each year for the remainder
of the benefits period.
In the past, we had elected to be taxed under
the Alternative Track and in subsequent years elected to forego this tax regime and elected to adopt the Preferred Technological Enterprise
regime as mentioned below.
Dividends paid to Shareholders out of any income
attributed to an Approved Enterprise (or out of dividends received from a company whose income is attributed to an Approved Enterprise)
are generally subject to withholding tax at the rate of 15% or at a lower rate provided under an applicable tax treaty (subject to the
receipt in advance of a valid certificate from the ITA allowing for a reduced tax rate). The 15% tax rate is limited to dividends and
distributions out of income derived during the benefits period and actually paid at any time up to 12 years thereafter. After this period,
the withholding tax is applied at a rate of up to 30%, or at the lower rate under an applicable tax treaty (subject to the receipt in
advance of a valid certificate from the Israel Tax Authority allowing for a reduced tax rate). In the case of a company which is considered
a Foreign Investment Company as defined in the Investment Law, the 12-year limitation on reduced withholding tax on dividends does not
apply.
A dividend distributed or deem distributed from
income which was exempt from tax (“Trapped Profits”) derived from the Approved Enterprise
will be subject to tax with respect to the amount distributed (grossed up to reflect such pre-tax income that it would have had to earn
in order to distribute the dividend) at the corporate tax rate which would otherwise been applicable, which is at ranged between 10%-25%,
depending on the level of foreign investment in the company in each year. Under the Investments Law, the transfer of funds from the company
to shareholders and other related parties may be deemed to be regarded as a dividend distribution for this purpose in certain circumstances.
On November 15, 2021 a new amendment of the Investment
Law was enacted (i) providing a reduced corporate income tax on the Trapped Profits distributed within a year from such amendment. The
reduced corporate income tax is based on a certain formula and subject to reinvestment of certain amounts in enumerated assets/activities;
(ii) harshening the rules with respect to determining the profits from which a dividend was distributed and providing that part of any
dividend distribution, will be deemed as distributed from the Trapped Profits, according to a certain formula. In 2021, the Company reached
a settlement with ITA and released all Trapped Profits pursuant to the aforementioned amendment.
Tax benefits under the 2005
Amendment
An amendment to the Investments Law, which was
effective as of April 1, 2005, changed certain provisions of the Investments Law, or the 2005 Amendment. An eligible investment program
under the 2005 Amendment qualified for benefits as a “Beneficiary Enterprise”. According to the 2005 Amendment, only Approved
Enterprises receiving cash grants require the prior approval of the Investment Center. As a result, a company was no longer required to
obtain the advance approval of the Investment Center in order to receive the tax benefits previously available under the alternative benefits
program. Rather, a company may claim the tax benefits offered by the Investment Law directly in its tax returns, provided that its facilities
meet the criteria for tax benefits set forth in the 2005 Amendment. A company that had a Beneficiary Enterprise may, at its discretion,
approach the ITA for a pre-ruling confirming that it is in compliance with the provisions of the Investment Law.
The duration of the tax benefits described
herein is limited to the earlier of seven (7) or ten (10) years (depending on the geographic location of the Beneficiary Enterprise within
Israel) from the Commencement Year (as described below) or 12 or 14 years from the first day of the Year of Election (as described below),
depending on the location of the company within Israel. Commencement Year is defined as the later of the first tax year in which a company
had derived liable income for tax purposes from the Beneficiary Enterprise, or the Year of Election, which is defined as the year in which
a company requested to have the tax benefits apply to the Beneficiary Enterprise. The tax benefits granted to a Beneficiary Enterprise
are determined, depending on the geographic location of the Beneficiary Enterprise within Israel.
Similar to the previously available Alternative
Track, exemption from corporate tax may be available on undistributed income for a period of two to ten years (i.e., Trapped Profits),
depending on the geographic location of the Beneficiary Enterprise within Israel, and a reduced corporate tax rate of 10% to 25% for the
remainder of the benefits period, depending on the level of foreign investment in each year. If the company pays a dividend out of income
derived from the Beneficiary Enterprise during the benefits period and such dividend is actually paid at any time up to 12 years thereafter,
except with respect to a foreign investment company, in which case the 12-year limit does not apply, such income will be subject to withholding
tax at the rate of 15% (in case of non-Israeli shareholders – subject to the receipt in advance of valid certificate from the ITA
allowing the 15% tax rate, or a lower rate under a tax treaty, if applicable). A Company that pays dividend out of Trapped Profits will
be subject to tax with respect to the amount distributed (grossed up to reflect such pre-tax income that it would have had to earn
in order to distribute the dividend) at the corporate tax rate which would have otherwise been applicable.
We had three Approved Enterprise plans under the
Investments Law, which entitled us to certain tax benefits.
As a result of the 2005 Amendment, tax-exempt
income generated under the provisions of the Investments Law, as amended, subjected us to taxes upon distribution or liquidation and we
may be required to record deferred tax liability with respect to such tax-exempt income. On November 15, 2021 a new amendment of the Investment
Law was enacted (i) providing a reduced corporate income tax on the Trapped Profits distributed within a year from such amendment. The
reduced corporate income tax is based on a certain formula and subject to reinvestment of certain amounts in enumerated assets/activities;
(ii) harshening the rules with respect to determining the profits from which a dividend was distributed and providing that part of any
dividend distribution, will be deemed as distributed from the Trapped Profits, according to a certain formula.
In December 2021, we entered into an elective
tax agreement with the Israeli Tax Authorities and opt-in with the new Amendment. The reduced corporate income tax on the Trapped Profits
was approximately $5.8M, or 10%, and was provided for in the 2021 financial statements of operations, net of related provisions.
Following this elective tax agreement, all of the Trapped Profits were released.
Tax benefits under the 2011
Amendment
On December 29, 2010, the Israeli Parliament approved
the 2011 amendment to the Investments Law (the “2011 Amendment”). The 2011 Amendment significantly revised the tax incentive
regime in Israel, commencing on January 1, 2011.
The 2011 Amendment introduced a new status of
“Preferred Enterprise”, replacing the existing status of “Beneficiary Enterprise” and introduced new benefits
for income generated by a “Preferred Company” through its Preferred Enterprise. A Preferred Company is an industrial company
that meets certain conditions (including a minimum threshold of 25% export). However, under the 2011 Amendment the requirement for a minimum
investment in productive assets in order to be eligible for the benefits granted under the Investments Law as with respect to “Beneficiary
Enterprise” was cancelled.
A Preferred Company is entitled to a reduced flat
tax rate with respect to its preferred income attributed to the Preferred Enterprise, at the following rates:
|
Tax Year |
Development Region “A” |
Other Areas within Israel |
|
2011-2012 |
10% |
15% |
|
2013 |
7% |
12.5% |
|
2014-2016 |
9% |
16% |
|
2017 onwards* |
7.5% |
16% |
* In December 2016, the Israeli Parliament (the
Knesset) approved an amendment to the Investments Law pursuant to which the tax rate applicable to Preferred Enterprises in Development
Region "A" would be reduced to 7.5% as of January 1, 2017.
The classification of income generated from the
provision of usage rights in know-how or software that were developed in the Preferred Enterprise, as well as royalty income received
with respect to such usage, as preferred income is subject to the issuance of a pre-ruling from the ITA stipulates that such income is
associated with the productive activity of the Preferred Enterprise in Israel.
In addition, the 2011 Amendment introduced a new
status of “Special Preferred Company” which is an Industrial company meeting, in addition to the conditions prescribed for
“Preferred Company” certain additional conditions (including that the total Preferred Enterprise income is at least NIS 1.5
billion in 2016 and NIS 1 billion and part of a group that generates income of at least NIS 10 billion). The tax rate applicable for a
period of 10 years to income generated by such an enterprise will be reduced to 5%, if located in Development Region “A”,
or to 8%, if located in other area within the State of Israel.
Dividends
distributed from preferred income which is attributed to a “Preferred Enterprise” or a “Special Preferred Enterprise”
will be subject to withholding tax at source at the following rates: (i) Israeli resident corporations – 0% (although, if such dividends
are subsequently distributed to individuals or a non-Israeli company, withholding tax at a rate of 20% (with respect to non-Israeli shareholders
– subject to the receipt in advance of a valid certificate from the ITA allowing the reduced 20%, or such lower rate as may be provided
in an applicable tax treaty), (ii) Israeli resident individuals – 20% (iii) non-Israeli residents - 20% or a lower rate under a
tax treaty, if applicable, subject to the receipt in advance of a valid certificate from the ITA allowing for a reduced tax rate.
The 2011 Amendment also revised the Grant Track
to apply only to the approved programs located in Development Region “A” and shall provide not only cash grants (as prior
to the 2011 Amendment) but also the granting of loans. The rates for grants and loans shall not be fixed but up to 20% of the amount of
the approved investment. In addition, a company owning a Preferred Enterprise under the Grant Track may be entitled also to the tax benefits
which are prescribed for a Preferred Enterprise.
The provisions of the 2011 Amendment did not
apply to existing “Beneficiary Enterprises” or “Approved Enterprises”, which continued to be entitled to the tax
benefits under the Investments Law, as has been in effect prior to the 2011 Amendment, unless the company owning such enterprises had
made an election to apply the provisions of the 2011 Amendment (such election cannot be later rescinded), which is to be filed with the
ITA, not later than the date prescribed for the filing of the company’s annual tax return for the respective year. A company owning
a Beneficiary Enterprise or Approved Enterprise which made such election by June 30, 2015, was entitled to distribute income generated
by the Approved/Beneficiary Enterprise (which is not related to Trapped Profits) to its Israeli corporate shareholders tax free.
Until the end of 2015, we did not utilize tax
benefits related to Preferred Enterprises. We utilized such benefits between 2016-2017.
The New Technological Enterprise Incentives Regime—the
2017 Amendment
The 2017 Amendment was enacted as part of the
Economic Efficiency Law that was published on December 29, 2016, and became effective on January 1, 2017. The 2017 Amendment provides
new tax benefits for two types of “Technology Enterprises”, as described below, and is in addition to the other existing tax
beneficial programs under the Investment Law.
The new incentives regime will apply to “Preferred
Technology Enterprises” that meet certain conditions, including: (1) the R&D expenses in the three years preceding the tax year
were on average at least 7% out of the company's turnover or exceeded NIS 75 million (approximately $23.5 million) for a year; and
(2) one of the following: (a) at least 20% of the workforce (or at least 200 employees) are employees whose full salary has been paid
and reported in the Company’s financial statements as R&D expenses; (b) a venture capital investment approximately equivalent
to at least NIS 8 million (approximately $2.5 million) was previously made in the company and the company did not change its line of business;
(c) growth in sales by an average of 25% or more, over the three years preceding the tax year, provided that the turnover was at least
NIS 10 million (approximately $3.1 million), in the tax year and in each of the preceding three years; or (d) growth in workforce by an
average of 25% or more, over the three years preceding the tax year, provided that the company employed at least 50 employees, in the
tax year and in each of the preceding three years.
A “Special Preferred Technological Enterprise”
is an enterprise that meets conditions 1 and 2 above, and in addition is part of a group that has total annual consolidated revenues at
least NIS 10 billion.
Preferred Technological Enterprises will be subject
to a reduced corporate tax rate of 12% on their income that qualifies as “Preferred Technology Income”, as defined in the
Investment Law. The tax rate is further reduced to 7.5% for a Preferred Technology Enterprise located in Development Region "A". These
corporate tax rates shall apply only with respect to the portion of intellectual property developed in Israel. In addition, a Preferred
Technology Company will enjoy a reduced corporate tax rate of 12% on capital gain derived from the sale of certain “Benefited Intangible
Assets” (as defined in the Investment Law) to a related foreign company if the Benefited Intangible Assets were acquired from a
foreign company on or after January 1, 2017 for at least NIS 200 million (approximately $62.7 million), and the sale receives prior approval
from the IIA. Special Preferred Technological Enterprises will be subject to 6% on “Preferred Technology Income” regardless
of the company’s geographic location within Israel.
In addition, a Special Preferred Technology Enterprise
will enjoy a reduced corporate tax rate of 6% on capital gain derived from the sale of certain “Beneficiary Intangible Assets”
to a related foreign company if the Beneficiary Intangible Assets were either developed by the Special Preferred Technology Enterprise
or acquired from a foreign company on or after January 1, 2017, and the sale received prior approval from the IIA.
A Special Preferred Technology Enterprise that
acquires Benefited Intangible Assets from a foreign company for more than NIS 500 million (approximately $157 million), will be eligible
for these benefits for at least ten years, subject to certain approvals as specified in the Investment Law.
Dividends distributed by a Preferred Technology
Enterprise or a Special Preferred Technology Enterprise, paid out of Preferred Technology Income, are generally subject to withholding
tax at source at the rate of 20% (in the case of non-Israeli shareholders - subject to the receipt in advance of a valid certificate from
the ITA allowing the 20% reduced tax rate or a reduced rate as may be provided in an applicable tax treaty). However, if such dividends
are paid to an Israeli company, no tax is required to be withheld. If such dividends are, distributed to a parent foreign company that
holds solely or together with other foreign companies at least 90% of the shares of the distributing company and other conditions are
met, the withholding tax rate will be 4% (or a lower rate under a tax treaty, if applicable, and subject to the receipt in advance of
a valid certificate from the ITA allowing for a reduced tax rate).
We reviewed the criteria for the tax rate of a
“Preferred Technological Enterprise” and a “Special Preferred Technological Enterprise” and concluded that we
are entitled to the reduced tax rate under the “Preferred Technological Enterprises” tax incentive regime starting 2017. We
have notified the ITA that we elected applying this status starting 2017. As part of these tax incentives, the Company is required to
allocate its taxable income between income from preferred technological enterprise and income related to preferred enterprise or regular
corporate income.
Law for the Encouragement of Industry (Taxes),
5729-1969
The Law for the Encouragement of Industry (Taxes),
5729–1969, or the Industry Encouragement Law defines an “Industrial Company” as an Israeli resident company which was
incorporated in Israel, of which 90% or more of its income in any tax year (exclusive of income from certain government loans) is generated
from an “Industrial Enterprise” that it owns and located in Israel or in the “Area”, in accordance with the definition
under section 3A of the Israeli Income Tax Ordinance (New Version) 1961, or the Ordinance. An “Industrial Enterprise”
is defined as an enterprise whose principal activity in any given tax year is industrial manufacturing.
An Industrial Company is entitled to certain tax
benefits, including: (i) an amortization of the cost of purchased patent, the right to use a patent or know-how that were purchased in
good faith and are used for the development or promotion of the Industrial Enterprise, over an eight-year period, beginning from the year
in which such rights were first used, (ii) under limited conditions, the right to elect to file consolidated tax returns with additional
Israeli Industrial Companies controlled by it, and (iii) the right to deduct expenses related to public offerings in equal amounts over
a period of three years beginning from the year of the offering.
Eligibility for benefits under the Encouragement
of Industry Law is not contingent upon approval of any governmental authority.
We believe that we qualify as an “Industrial
Company” within the meaning of the Industry Encouragement Law. There is no assurance that we qualify or will continue to qualify
as an Industrial Company or that the benefits described above will be available to us in the future.
Taxation of the Company Shareholders
Capital Gains
Capital gain tax is imposed on the disposition
of capital assets by an Israeli resident, and on the disposition of such assets by a non-Israeli resident if those assets are either (i)
located in Israel; (ii) are shares or a right to a share in an Israeli resident corporation, or (iii) represent, directly or indirectly,
rights to assets located in Israel, unless a tax treaty between Israel and the seller’s country of residence provides otherwise.
The Ordinance distinguishes between “Real Gain” and the “Inflationary Surplus”. Real Gain is the excess of the
total capital gain over Inflationary Surplus computed generally on the basis of the increase in the Israeli Consumer Price Index (CPI)
or, in certain circumstances, according to the change in the foreign currency exchange rate, between the date of purchase and the date
of disposition.
Generally, the capital gain accrued by individuals
on the sale of our ordinary shares will be taxed at the rate of 25% (for any asset other than shares that are listed on a stock exchange
purchased on or after January 1, 2003 the portion of the gain generated up to December 31, 2011 will be subject to the previous capital
gains tax rates - 20% or 25% in case of a Controlling Shareholder as described below). However, if the individual shareholder is a “Controlling
Shareholder” (i.e., a person who holds, directly or indirectly, alone or together with such person’s relative or another person
who collaborates with such person on a permanent basis based on a contract, 10% or more of one of the Israeli resident company’s
“means of control”) at the time of sale or at any time during the preceding twelve (12) months period (or claims a deduction
for interest and linkage differences expenses in connection with the purchase and holding of such shares), such gain will be taxed at
the rate of 30%.
The Real Gain derived by corporations will be
generally subject to the ordinary corporate tax rate (23% in 2018 and thereafter).
Individual and corporate shareholder dealing in
securities in Israel are taxed at the tax rates applicable to business income – 23% for corporations in 2018 and thereafter and
a marginal tax rate of up to 47% in 2025 for individuals, unless the benefiting provisions of an applicable treaty applies.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, capital gain derived
from the sale of our ordinary shares by a non-Israeli shareholder may be exempt under the Ordinance from Israeli taxation provided that
the following cumulative conditions, among other things, are met: (i) the shares were purchased upon or after the registration of the
securities on the stock exchange, (ii) the seller does not have a permanent establishment in Israel to which the derived capital gain
is attributed; and (iii) with respect to our ordinary shares listed on a recognized stock exchange outside of Israel, so long as neither
the shareholder nor the particular capital gain is otherwise subject to the Israeli Income Tax Law (Inflationary Adjustments) 5745-1985.
Non-Israeli corporations will not be entitled to the foregoing exemptions if (i) an Israeli resident has a controlling interest, directly
or indirectly, alone or together with another (i.e., together with a relative, or together with someone who is not a relative but with
whom, according to an agreement, there is regular cooperation in material matters of the company, directly or indirectly), or together
with another Israeli resident, exceed 25% in one or more of the “means of control” in such non-Israeli resident corporation
or (ii) Israeli residents are the beneficiaries of, or are entitled to, 25% or more of the revenues or profits of such non-Israeli resident
corporation, whether directly or indirectly.
In addition, the sale of shares may be exempt
from Israeli capital gain tax under the provisions of an applicable tax treaty. For example, the U.S.-Israel Double Tax Treaty exempts
U.S. resident from Israeli capital gain tax in connection with such sale, exchange or disposition provided, among others, that (i) the
U.S. resident owned, directly or indirectly, less than 10% of an Israeli resident company’s voting power at any time within the
12 month period preceding such sale; (ii) the seller, being an individual, is present in Israel for a period or periods of less than 183
days in the aggregate at the taxable year; (iii) the capital gain from the sale was not derived through a permanent establishment of the
U.S. resident which is maintained in Israel; (iv) the capital gain arising from such sale, exchange or disposition is not attributed
to real estate located in Israel; (v) the capital gains arising from such sale, exchange or disposition is not attributed to royalties;
and (vi) the shareholder is a U.S. resident (for purposes of the U.S.-Israel Double Tax Treaty) and is holding the shares as a capital
asset. Under the U.S.-Israel Double Tax Treaty, a U.S. resident would be permitted to claim a credit for the Israeli tax against the U.S.
federal income tax imposed with respect to the sale, exchange or disposition, subject to the limitations in U.S. laws applicable to foreign
tax credits. The U.S.-Israel Double Tax Treaty does not provide such credit against any U.S. state or local taxes.
Either the purchaser, the stockbrokers or financial
institution, through which payment to the seller is made, are obliged, subject to the above-mentioned exemptions, to withhold Israeli
tax at source from such payment. Shareholders may be required to demonstrate that they are exempt from tax on their capital gains in order
to avoid withholding at source at the time of sale. Specifically, in transactions involving a sale of all of the shares of an Israeli
resident company, in the form of a merger or otherwise, the ITA may require from shareholders who are not liable for Israeli tax to sign
declarations in forms specified by this authority or obtain a specific exemption from the ITA to confirm their status as non-Israeli resident.
At the sale of securities traded on a stock exchange
a detailed return, including a computation of the tax due, must be filed and an advanced payment must be paid on January 31 and July 31
of every tax year in respect of sales of securities made within the previous six months. However, if all tax due was withheld at source
according to applicable provisions of the Ordinance and regulations promulgated thereunder the aforementioned return need not be filed
and no advance payment must be paid. Capital gain is also reportable on the annual income tax return.
All tax rates indicated exclude any excess tax
that may be added to the tax liability pursuant to applicable law. See “Item 10. E – Excess Tax” in this Annual Report.
Dividends
A distribution of dividends from income, which
is not attributed to an Approved Enterprise/Beneficiary Enterprise/Preferred Enterprise/Preferred Technological Enterprise to an Israeli
resident individual, will generally be subject to income tax at a rate of 25%. However, a 30% tax rate will apply if the dividend recipient
is a “Controlling Shareholder” (as defined above) at the time of distribution or at any time during the preceding 12 months
period. If the recipient of the dividend is an Israeli resident corporation, such dividend will be exempt from income tax provided the
income from which such dividend is distributed was derived or accrued within Israel.
Distribution of dividends from income attributed
to a Preferred Enterprise or a Preferred Technological Enterprise is generally subject to a withholding tax at source at the rate of 20%.
However, if such dividends are distributed to an Israeli company, no withholding tax is imposed, although, if such dividends are subsequently
distributed to individuals or a non-Israeli company, withholding tax at a rate of 20% (in case of a non-Israeli shareholder – subject
to the receipt in advance of a valid certificate from the ITA allowing the reduced 20% or such lower rate as may be provided in an applicable
tax treaty may apply). Dividends distributed from income attributed to an Approved Enterprise and/or a Beneficiary Enterprise are generally
subject to a withholding tax at source at the rate of 15% (in the case of non-Israeli shareholders – subject to the receipt in advance
of valid certificate from the ITA allowing the reduced 15% tax rate or such a reduced tax rate as may be provided under an applicable
tax treaty).
The Ordinance generally provides that a non-Israeli
resident (either individual or corporation) is subject to an Israeli income tax on the receipt of dividends at the rate of 25% (30% if
the dividends recipient is a “Controlling Shareholder” (as defined above), at the time of distribution or at any time during
the preceding 12 months period); those rates are subject to a reduced tax rate under the provisions of an applicable double tax treaty
(subject to the receipt in advance of a valid certificate from the ITA allowing for a reduced tax rate). For example, under the U.S.-Israel
Double Tax Treaty the following rates will generally apply in respect of dividends distributed by an Israeli resident company to a U.S.
resident: (i) if the U.S. resident is a corporation which holds during that portion of the taxable year which precedes the date of payment
of the dividend and during the whole of its prior taxable year (if any), at least 10% of the outstanding shares of the voting stock of
the Israeli resident paying corporation and not more than 25% of the gross income of the Israeli resident paying corporation for such
prior taxable year (if any) consists of certain type of interest or dividends – the maximum tax rate is 12.5% on dividends, not
generated by an Approved Enterprise or a Beneficiary Enterprise, (ii) if both the conditions mentioned in section (i) above are met and
the dividend is paid from an Israeli resident company’s income which was entitled to a reduced tax rate applicable to an Approved
Enterprise or a Beneficiary Enterprise – the tax rate is 15%, and (iii) in all other cases, the tax rate is 25%, or the domestic
rate (if such is lower). The aforementioned rates under the U.S.-Israel Double Tax Treaty will not apply if the dividend income was derived
through a permanent establishment of the U.S. resident maintained in Israel.
If the dividend is attributable partly to income
derived from an Approved Enterprise, a Beneficiary Enterprise a Preferred Enterprise, or a Technological Preferred Enterprise, and partly
to other sources of income, the withholding rate will be a blended rate reflecting the relative portions of the two types of income.
Payors of dividends on our shares, including the
Israeli stockbroker effectuating the transaction, or the financial institution through which the securities are held, are generally required,
subject to any of the foregoing exemption, reduced tax rates and the demonstration of a shareholder of his, her or its foreign residency,
to withhold taxes upon the distribution of dividends at a rate of 25%, provided that the shares are registered with a Nominee Company
(for corporations and individuals, whether the recipient is a Controlling Shareholder or not).
A non-Israeli resident who receives dividends
from which tax was withheld is generally exempt from the obligation to file tax returns in Israel with respect to such income, provided
that (i) such income was not generated from business conducted in Israel by the taxpayer, (ii) the taxpayer has no other taxable sources
of income in Israel with respect to which a tax return is required to be filed, and (iii) in the case of individuals, the taxpayer is
not obligated to pay excess tax (as further explained below).
All tax rates indicated exclude any excess tax
that may be added to the tax liability pursuant to applicable law. See “Item 10. E – Excess Tax” in this Annual Report.
Excess Tax
Individuals who are subject to tax in Israel (whether
any such individual is an Israeli resident or non-Israeli resident) are also subject to an additional tax at a rate of 3% on annual income
exceeding NIS 721,560 (approximately $226 thousand) for 2025, which amount is generally linked to the annual change in the Israeli consumer
price index (with the exception that based on Israeli new legislation such amount, and certain other statutory amounts will not be linked
to the Israeli consumer price index for the years 2025-2027), including, but not limited to, dividends, interest and capital gain. According
to new legislation, set to take effect on January 1, 2025, an additional
2% excess tax will be imposed on Capital-Sourced Income (defined as income from any source other than employment income, business income
or income from “personal effort”), to the extent that the Individual’s Capital Sourced Income exceeds the specified
threshold of NIS 721,560 (and regardless of the employment/business income amount of such individual). This new excess tax will apply,
among other things, to income from capital gains, dividends, interest, rental income, or the sale of real property.
Estate and Gift Tax
Israeli law presently does not impose estate or
gift taxes.
Foreign Exchange Regulations
Non-residents of Israel who hold our ordinary
shares are able to receive any dividends, and any amounts payable upon the dissolution, liquidation and winding up of our affairs, repayable
in non-Israeli currency at the rate of exchange prevailing at the time of conversion. However, Israeli income tax is generally required
to have been paid or withheld on these amounts. In addition, the statutory framework for the potential imposition of currency exchange
control has not been eliminated, and may be restored at any time by administrative action.
U.S. Taxation
The following discussion describes certain
material United States (“U.S.”) federal income tax consequences generally applicable to U.S. holders (as defined below) of
the purchase, ownership and disposition of our ordinary shares. This summary addresses only holders who acquire and hold ordinary shares
as “capital assets” for U.S. federal income tax purposes (generally, assets held for investment purposes).
For purposes of this discussion, a “U.S.
holder” is a beneficial owner of ordinary shares who is:
| |
• |
An individual citizen or resident of the U.S. (as determined under
U.S. federal income tax rules); |
| |
• |
a corporation (or another entity taxable as a corporation for U.S.
federal income tax purposes) created or organized in or under the laws of the U.S., any state thereof, or the District of Columbia;
|
| |
• |
an estate, the income of which is subject to U.S. federal income
taxation regardless of its source; or |
| |
• |
a trust, if (a) a U.S. court is able to exercise primary supervision
over its administration and one or more U.S. persons have the authority to control all of its substantial decisions; or (b) the trust
has in effect a valid election in effect under applicable Treasury Regulations (as defined below) to be treated as a United States person.
|
This summary is for general information purposes
only and does not purport to be a comprehensive description of all of the U.S. federal income tax considerations that may be relevant
to a decision to purchase, hold or dispose of the Company’s ordinary shares. In addition, the possible application of U.S. federal
estate or gift taxes or any aspect of state, local or non-U.S. tax laws is not considered. This discussion is based on current provisions
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), Treasury Regulations promulgated under the Code by the U.S.
Treasury Department (including proposed and temporary regulations) (the “Treasury Regulations”), rulings, current administrative
interpretations and official pronouncements by the IRS, and judicial decisions, all as currently in effect and all of which are subject
to differing interpretations or to change, with a retroactive effect. Such changes could materially and adversely affect the tax consequences
described below. No assurance can be given that the IRS would not assert, or that a court would not sustain, a position contrary to any
of the tax consequences described below.
This discussion does not address all aspects
of U.S. federal income taxation that may be relevant to any particular U.S. holder based on the holder’s particular circumstances,
including, but not limited to:
| |
• |
persons who own, directly, indirectly or constructively, 10% or more (by voting power
or value) of our outstanding voting shares; |
| |
• |
persons who hold the ordinary shares as part of a hedging, straddle or conversion transaction;
|
| |
• |
persons whose functional currency is not the U.S. dollar; |
| |
• |
persons who acquire their ordinary shares in a compensatory transaction; |
| |
• |
regulated investment companies; |
| |
• |
real estate investment companies; |
| |
• |
qualified retirement plans, individual retirement accounts and other
tax-deferred accounts; |
| |
• |
traders who elect to mark-to-market their securities; |
| |
• |
tax-exempt organizations; |
| |
• |
banks or other financial institutions; |
| |
• |
persons subject to special tax accounting rules as a result of any
item of gross income with respect to ordinary shares being taken into account in an applicable financial statement; |
| |
• |
U.S. expatriates and certain former citizens and long-term residents
of the United States; and |
| |
• |
Persons subject to any alternative minimum tax. |
The tax treatment of a partner in a partnership
(or other entity or arrangement classified as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes) may depend on both the partnership’s
and the partner’s status and the activities of the partnership. Partnerships (or other entities or arrangements classified as a
partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes) that are beneficial owners of ordinary shares, and their partners and other owners,
should consult their own tax advisers regarding the tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership and disposition of ordinary shares.
THIS SUMMARY OF MATERIAL UNITED STATES FEDERAL
INCOME TAX CONSIDERATIONS IS FOR GENERAL INFORMATION ONLY AND IS NOT TAX ADVICE. EACH HOLDER SHOULD CONSULT ITS TAX ADVISOR WITH RESPECT
TO THE PARTICULAR TAX CONSEQUENCES TO IT OF AN INVESTMENT IN THE ORDINARY SHARES, INCLUDING THE EFFECTS OF APPLICABLE UNITED STATES FEDERAL
INCOME TAX LAWS AS WELL AS ANY TAX CONSEQUENCES ARISING UNDER THE UNITED STATES FEDERAL ESTATE OR GIFT TAX RULES OR UNDER THE LAWS OF
ANY FOREIGN, STATE OR LOCAL JURISDICTION OR UNDER ANY APPLICABLE TAX TREATY.
Distributions on the Ordinary Shares
We currently do not intend to distribute dividends
for at least the next several years. However, if we make any distributions of cash or other property to a U.S. holder of our ordinary
shares, the amount of the distribution for U.S. federal income tax purposes will equal the amount of cash and the fair market value of
any property distributed and will also include the amount of Israeli taxes withheld, if any, as described above under “[Israel Taxation]
— Dividends” above. In general (and subject to the PFIC rules discussed below), any distribution paid by us on the ordinary
shares to a U.S. holder will be treated as dividend income to the extent the distribution does not exceed our current and/or accumulated
earnings and profits, as determined under U.S. federal income tax principles. The amount of any distribution which exceeds these earnings
and profits will be treated first as a non-taxable return of capital, reducing the U.S. holder’s tax basis in its ordinary shares
to the extent thereof, and then as capital gain income (long-term capital gain if the U.S. holder’s holding period exceeds one year),
from the deemed disposition of the ordinary shares (subject to the PFIC rules discussed below). Corporate holders generally will not be
allowed a deduction for dividends received on the ordinary shares.
The amount of any dividend paid in NIS (including
amounts withheld to pay Israeli withholding taxes) will equal the U.S. dollar value of the NIS calculated by reference to the exchange
rate in effect on the date the dividend is received by the U.S. holder, regardless of whether the NIS are converted into U.S. dollars.
A U.S. holder will have a tax basis in the NIS equal to their U.S. dollar value on the date of receipt. If the NIS received are converted
into U.S. dollars on the date of receipt, the U.S. holder should generally not be required to recognize foreign currency gain or loss
in respect of the distribution. If the NIS received are not converted into U.S. dollars on the date of receipt, a U.S. holder may recognize
foreign currency gain or loss on a subsequent conversion or other disposition of the NIS. Such gain or loss will be treated as U.S. source
ordinary income or loss.
Dividends paid by us generally will be foreign
source, “passive income” for U.S. foreign tax credit purposes. U.S. holders may elect to claim as a foreign tax credit against
their U.S. federal income tax liability the Israeli income tax withheld from dividends received on the ordinary shares. The Code provides
limitations on the amount of foreign tax credits that a U.S. holder may claim. U.S. holders that do not elect to claim a foreign tax credit
may instead claim a deduction for Israeli income tax withheld, but only for a year in which these U.S. holders elect to do so for all
foreign income taxes. Certain U.S. Treasury regulations that apply to foreign income tax paid or accrued in taxable years beginning on
or after December 28, 2021 restrict the availability of any such credit based on the nature of the tax imposed by the foreign jurisdiction
(although Notice 2023-55 provides temporary relief from the application of certain aspects of these regulations and such relief has been
extended by Notice 2023-80 indefinitely until new guidance or regulations are issued). The rules relating to foreign tax credits are complex
(and may also be impacted by the tax treaty between the United States and Israel), and you should consult your tax advisor to determine
whether you would be entitled to this credit.
Under current law, certain distributions treated
as dividends that are received by an individual U.S. holder from a “qualified foreign corporation” generally qualify for a
20% reduced maximum tax rate so long as certain holding period and other requirements are met. A non-U.S. corporation (other than a corporation
that is treated as a PFIC with respect to the U.S. holder for the taxable year in which the dividend is paid or the preceding taxable
year) generally will be considered to be a qualified foreign corporation (i) if it is eligible for the benefits of a comprehensive tax
treaty with the United States which the Secretary of Treasury of the United States determines is satisfactory for purposes of this provision
and which includes an exchange of information program, or (ii) with respect to any dividend it pays on stock which is readily tradable
on an established securities market in the United States. Dividends paid by us in a taxable year in which we are not a PFIC and with respect
to which we were not a PFIC in the preceding taxable year with respect to the U.S. holder are expected to be eligible for the 20% reduced
maximum tax rate, although we can offer no assurances in this regard. However, any dividend paid by us in a taxable year in which we are
a PFIC or were a PFIC in the preceding taxable year with respect to the U.S. holder will be subject to tax at regular ordinary income
rates (along with any applicable additional PFIC tax liability, as discussed below).
The additional 3.8% tax on “net investment
income” (described below) may apply to dividends received by certain U.S. holders who meet certain modified adjusted gross income
thresholds.
Sale, Exchange or Other Taxable Disposition of
the Ordinary Shares
Upon the sale, exchange or other taxable disposition
of the ordinary shares (subject to the PFIC rules discussed below), a U.S. holder generally will recognize capital gain or loss in an
amount equal to the difference between the amount realized and the U.S. holder’s tax basis in the ordinary shares. The gain or loss
recognized on the sale or exchange of the ordinary shares generally will be long-term capital gain (currently taxable at a reduced rate
for non-corporate U.S. holders) or loss if the U.S. holder’s holding period of the ordinary shares is more than one year at the
time of the disposition. The deductibility of capital losses is subject to limitations.
Gain or loss recognized by a U.S. holder on
a sale or exchange of ordinary shares generally will be treated as U.S. source income or loss for U.S. foreign tax credit purposes. Under
the tax treaty between the United States and Israel, gain derived from the sale, exchange or other taxable disposition of ordinary shares
by a holder who is a resident of the U.S. for purposes of the treaty and who sells the ordinary shares within Israel may be treated as
foreign source income for U.S. foreign tax credit purposes. However, if a U.S. holder is eligible for the benefit of the income tax convention
between the United States and the State of Israel and pays Israeli tax in excess of the amount applicable to such U.S. holder under such
convention or if the Israeli tax paid is refundable, the U.S. holder will not be able to claim any foreign tax credit or deduction with
respect to such excess portion of Israeli tax paid or the amount of Israeli tax refunded. In addition, pursuant to applicable United States
Treasury regulations, if a U.S. holder is not eligible for the benefits of an applicable income tax treaty or does not elect to apply
such treaty, then such holder may not be able to claim a foreign tax credit arising from any foreign tax imposed on the disposition of
our ordinary shares, depending on the nature of such foreign tax. The rules governing the treatment of foreign taxes imposed on a U.S.
holder and foreign tax credits are complex, and U.S. holders should consult their tax advisors as to whether the Israeli tax on gains
may be creditable or deductible in light of their particular circumstances, including their eligibility for benefits under an applicable
treaty and the potential impact of applicable United States Treasury regulations.
The additional 3.8% tax on “net investment
income” (described below) may apply to certain U.S. holders who meet certain modified adjusted gross income thresholds, including
capital gains.
Passive Foreign Investment Companies
In general, a foreign (i.e., non-U.S.) corporation
will be a PFIC for any taxable year in which, after applying the relevant look-through rules with respect to the income and assets
of its subsidiaries, either (1) 75% or more of its gross income in the taxable year is “passive income,” or (2) assets held
for the production of, or that produce, passive income comprise 50% or more of the average of its total asset value in the taxable year.
For purpose of the income test, passive income generally includes dividends, interest, royalties, rents, annuities and net gains from
the disposition of assets, which produce passive income. For purposes of the asset test, assets held for the production of passive income
includes assets held for the production of, or that produce dividends, interest, royalties, rents, annuities, and other income that are
considered passive income for purposes of the income test. In determining whether we meet the asset test, cash is considered a passive
asset and the total value of our assets generally will be treated as equal to the sum of the aggregate fair market value of our outstanding
stock plus our liabilities. If we own at least 25% (by value) of the stock of another corporation, we will be treated, for purposes of
the PFIC tests, as owning our proportionate share of the other corporation’s assets and receiving our proportionate share of the
other corporation’s income. The income test is conducted at the taxable year-end. The asset test is conducted on a quarterly basis
and the quarterly results are then averaged together.
If a corporation is treated as a PFIC for any
year during a U.S. holder’s holding period and the U.S. holder does not timely elect to treat the corporation as a “qualified
electing fund” under Section 1295 of the Code or elect to mark its ordinary shares to market (both elections described below), any
gain on the disposition of the shares will be treated as ordinary income, rather than capital gain, and the holder will be required to
compute its tax liability on that gain, as well as on dividends and other distributions, as if the income had been earned ratably over
each day in the U.S. holder’s holding period for the shares. The portion of the gain and distributions allocated to prior taxable
years in which a corporation was a PFIC will be ineligible for any preferential tax rate otherwise applicable to any “qualified
dividend income” or capital gains, and will be taxed at the highest ordinary income tax rate in effect for each taxable year to
which this portion is allocated. An interest charge will be imposed on the amount of the tax allocated to these taxable years. A U.S.
holder may elect to treat a corporation as a qualified electing fund only if the corporation complies with requirements imposed by the
IRS to enable the shareholder and the IRS to determine the corporation’s ordinary earnings and net capital gain. Additionally, if
a corporation is a PFIC, a U.S. holder who acquires shares in the corporation from a decedent generally will be denied the normally available
step-up in tax basis to fair market value for the shares at the date of death of the decedent and instead will have a tax basis equal
to the decedent’s tax basis if lower than fair market value. These adverse tax consequences associated with PFIC status could result
in a material increase in the amount of tax that a U.S. holder would owe and an imposition of tax earlier than would otherwise be imposed
and additional tax form filing requirements. Unless otherwise provided by the IRS, if a corporation is classified as a PFIC, a U.S. person
that is a direct or indirect holder generally will be required to file IRS Form 8621, Information Return by a Shareholder of a Passive
Foreign Investment Company or Qualified Electing Fund, or any applicable successor form, to report its ownership interest in such entity.
If a corporation is treated as a PFIC with
respect to a U.S. holder for any taxable year, the U.S. holder will be deemed to own shares in any of the foreign entities in which such
corporation holds equity interests that are also PFICs (or “lower-tier PFICs”), and the U.S. holder may be subject to the
tax consequences described above with respect to the shares of such lower-tier PFIC such U.S. holder would be deemed to own.
Status of
Nova as a PFIC. Under the income test, less than 75% of our gross income was passive income
in 2025. Under the asset test, while we continued to have substantial amounts of cash and
short-term deposits and the market value of our ordinary shares continued to be volatile, a determination of the value of our assets by
reference to the average market value of our ordinary shares and our liabilities results in a conclusion that the average value of our
passive assets did not exceed 50% of the average value of our gross assets in 2025. Nonetheless, there is a risk that we were a PFIC in
2025 or we will be a PFIC in 2026 or subsequent years. Additionally, due to the complexity of the PFIC provisions and the limited authority
available to interpret such provisions, there can be no assurance that our determination regarding our PFIC status could not be successfully
challenged by the IRS.
Available
Elections. If we become a PFIC for any taxable year, an election to treat us as a “qualified
electing fund” or to “mark-to-market” our ordinary shares may mitigate the adverse tax consequences of PFIC status to
a U.S. holder.
If a U.S. holder makes a qualified electing
fund election (a “QEF election”) for its ordinary shares that is effective from the first taxable year that the U.S. holder
holds our ordinary shares and during which we are a PFIC, the electing U.S. holder will avoid the adverse consequences of our being classified
as a PFIC, but will instead be required to include in income a pro rata share of our net capital gain, if any, and other earnings and
profits (“ordinary earnings”) as long-term capital gains and ordinary income, respectively, on a current basis, in each case
whether or not distributed, in the taxable year of the U.S. holder in which or with which our taxable year ends. A subsequent distribution
of amounts that were previously included in the gross income of U.S. holders should not be taxable as a dividend to those U.S. holders
who made a QEF election. In the event we incur a net loss for a taxable year, such loss will not be available as a deduction to an electing
U.S. holder, and may not be carried forward or back in computing our net capital gain or ordinary earnings in other taxable years. The
tax basis of the shares of an electing U.S. holder generally will be increased by amounts that are included in income, and decreased by
amounts distributed but not taxed as dividends, under the QEF rules described above. In order to make (or maintain) a QEF election, the
U.S. holder must annually complete and file IRS Form 8621, Information Return by a Shareholder of a Passive Foreign Investment Company
or Qualified Electing Fund, or any applicable successor form. However, we do not expect that we will prepare or provide to U.S. Holders
a “PFIC annual information statement,” which would enable a U.S. Holder to make a QEF election.
Alternatively, if a U.S. holder elects to “mark-to-market”
its ordinary shares, the U.S. holder generally will include in its income any excess of the fair market value of our ordinary shares at
the close of each taxable year over the holder’s adjusted basis in such ordinary shares. A U.S. holder generally will be allowed
an ordinary deduction for the excess, if any, of the adjusted tax basis of the ordinary shares over the fair market value of the ordinary
shares as of the close of the taxable year, or the amount of any net mark-to-market gains recognized for prior taxable years, whichever
is less. A U.S. holder’s adjusted tax basis in the ordinary shares generally will be adjusted to reflect the amounts included or
deducted under the mark-to-market election. Additionally, any gain on the actual sale or other disposition of the ordinary shares generally
will be treated as ordinary income. Ordinary loss treatment also will apply to any loss recognized on the actual sale or other disposition
of ordinary shares to the extent that the amount of such loss does not exceed the net mark-to-market gains previously included with respect
to such ordinary shares. If a U.S. holder makes a valid mark-to-market election with respect to our ordinary shares for the first taxable
year of the U.S. holder in which the U.S. holder holds (or is deemed to hold) our ordinary shares and for which we are determined to be
a PFIC, such holder generally will not be subject to the PFIC rules described above in respect of its ordinary shares. A mark-to-market
election applies to the tax year for which the election is made and to each subsequent year, unless our ordinary shares cease to be marketable,
as specifically defined, or the IRS consents to revocation of the election. No view is expressed regarding whether our ordinary shares
are marketable for these purposes or whether the election will be available. However, because a mark-to-market election likely cannot
be made for any lower-tier PFICs, if we are a PFIC, a U.S. holder will generally continue to be subject to the PFIC rules discussed above
with respect to such holder’s indirect interest in any investments that we hold that are treated as an equity interest in a PFIC
for U.S. federal income tax purposes. As a result, it is possible that any mark-to-market election will be of limited benefit.
If a U.S. holder makes either the QEF election
or the mark-to-market election, distributions and gain will not be recognized ratably over the U.S. holder’s holding period or be
subject to an interest charge as described above. Further, the denial of basis step-up at death described above will not apply. If a U.S.
holder makes the QEF election, gain on the sale of the ordinary shares will be characterized as capital gain. However, U.S. holders making
one of these two elections may experience current income recognition, even if we do not distribute any cash. The elections must be made
with the U.S. holder’s federal income tax return for the year of election, filed by the due date of the return (as it may be extended)
or, under certain circumstances provided in applicable Treasury Regulations, subsequent to that date.
The foregoing discussion relating to the QEF
election and mark-to-market elections assumes that a U.S. holder makes the applicable election with respect to the first year in which
Nova qualifies as a PFIC. If the election is not made for the first year in which Nova qualifies as a PFIC, the procedures for making
the election and the consequences of election will be different.
SPECIFIC RULES AND REQUIREMENTS APPLY TO BOTH
THE QEF ELECTION AND THE MARK-TO-MARKET ELECTION, AND YOU ARE URGED TO CONSULT YOUR TAX ADVISOR CONCERNING OUR PFIC STATUS AND THE VARIOUS
ELECTIONS YOU CAN MAKE.
Medicare Tax on Net Investment Income
A U.S. holder that is an individual or estate,
or a trust that does not fall into a special class of trusts that is exempt from such tax, will be subject to a 3.8% tax on the lesser
of (1) the U.S. holder’s “net investment income” for the relevant taxable year and (2) the excess of the U.S. holder’s
modified adjusted gross income for the taxable year over a certain threshold. A U.S. holder’s “net investment income”
generally may include its dividend income and its net gains from the disposition of shares, unless such dividends or net gains are derived
in the ordinary course of the conduct of a trade or business (other than a trade or business that consists of certain passive or trading
activities). If you are a U.S. holder that is an individual, estate or trust, you are urged to consult your tax advisors regarding the
applicability of the Medicare tax to your income and gains in respect of your investment in the shares and the interaction of these rules
with the rules applicable to income included as a result of the QEF election.
United States Information Reporting and Backup
Withholding
In general, U.S. holders may be subject to
certain information reporting requirements under the Code relating to their purchase and/or ownership of stock of a foreign corporation
such as the Company. Failure to comply with these information reporting requirements may result in substantial penalties.
Specifically, certain U.S. Holders holding
specified foreign financial assets, including our ordinary shares, with an aggregate value in excess of the applicable U.S. dollar threshold,
are subject to certain exceptions, required to report information relating to our Ordinary Shares by attaching a complete IRS Form 8938,
Statement of Specified Foreign Financial Assets, to their tax returns, for each year in which they hold our ordinary shares. U.S. Holders
are urged to consult their own tax advisors regarding information reporting requirements relating to the ownership of our Ordinary Shares.
In addition, and as discussed in the section
of this Annual Report entitled “U.S. Taxation – Passive Foreign Investment Companies”, if a corporation is classified
as a PFIC, a U.S. person that is a direct or indirect holder generally will be required to file an informational return annually on IRS
Form 8621, Information Return by a Shareholder of a Passive Foreign Investment Company or Qualified Electing Fund, or any applicable successor
form, to report its ownership interest in such entity, unless otherwise provided by the IRS.
Dividend payments and proceeds from the sale
or disposal of ordinary shares may be subject to information reporting to the IRS and possible U.S. federal backup withholding. Certain
holders (including, among others, corporations) generally are not subject to information reporting and backup withholding. A U.S. holder
generally will be subject to backup withholding if such holder is not otherwise exempt and such holder:
| |
• |
fails to furnish its taxpayer identification number, or TIN, which,
for an individual, is ordinarily his or her social security number; |
| |
• |
furnishes an incorrect TIN; |
| |
• |
is notified by the IRS that it is subject to backup withholding because
it has previously failed to properly report payments of interest or dividends; or |
| |
• |
fails to certify, under penalties of perjury, that it has furnished
a correct TIN and that the IRS has not notified the U.S. holder that it is subject to backup withholding. |
Any U.S. holder who is required to establish
exempt status generally must file IRS Form W-9 (“Request for Taxpayer Identification Number and Certification”).
Backup withholding is not an additional tax
and may be claimed as a refund or a credit against the U.S. federal income tax liability of a U.S. Holder, provided that the required
information is timely furnished to the IRS.
10.F
Dividends and Paying Agents
Not applicable.
10.G
Statements by Experts
Not applicable.
10.H
Documents on Display
As a foreign private issuer, are exempt from the
rules under the Exchange Act related to the furnishing and content of proxy statements, and our officers, directors and principal shareholders
are exempt from the reporting and short-swing profit recovery provisions contained in Section 16 of the Exchange Act; however, following
recent amendment to Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act, our directors and certain of our officers will become subject to the reporting
provisions set forth therein, effective March 18, 2026. Furthermore, as a foreign private issuer, we are also not subject to the requirements
of Regulation FD (Fair Disclosure) promulgated under the Exchange Act. In addition, we are not required under the Exchange Act to file
annual or other reports and consolidated financial statements with the SEC as frequently or as promptly as U.S. companies whose securities
are registered under the Exchange Act. Instead, we must file with the SEC, within 120 days after the end of each fiscal year, or such
other applicable time as required by the SEC, an Annual Report containing consolidated financial statements audited by an independent
registered public accounting firm. We also intend to furnish certain other material information to the SEC under cover of Form 6-K.
We maintain a corporate website at www.novami.com.
Information contained on, or that can be accessed through, our website does not constitute a part of this Annual Report. We have included
our website address in this Annual Report solely as an inactive textual reference.
10.I
Subsidiary Information
Not applicable.
10.J
Annual Report to Security Holders
Not applicable.
Item 11.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Market Risk
Market risk represents the risk of loss that may
impact the consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows of the Company. The Company is exposed to market risk
in the area of foreign exchange rates, as described below.
The Company does not utilize financial instruments
for trading purposes and holds no derivative financial instruments that could expose it to significant market risk.
Impact of Currency Fluctuation
Because our results are reported in U.S. Dollars,
changes in the rate of exchange between the Dollar and local currencies in those countries in which we operate (primarily NIS and Euro)
will affect the results of our operations. The dollar cost of our operations in countries other than the U.S., is negatively influenced
by revaluation of the U.S. dollar against other currencies. During 2025, the value of the U.S. dollar devaluated against the NIS by approximately
12.5% and revaluated against the Euro by approximately 11.3%. As of December 31, 2025, the majority of our net monetary assets were denominated
in dollars and the remainder was denominated mainly in NIS and Euro. Net monetary assets that are not denominated in dollars or dollar-linked
NIS were affected by the currency fluctuations in 2025 and are expected to continue to be affected by such currency fluctuations in 2026.
As of December 31, 2025 the Company recorded a NIS and Israel CPI linked lease liability, under the implementation of ASC 842 in the amount
of $39 million (including exchange rate differences of $2.9 million).
In 2025, we entered into currency-forward transactions
and currency-put options (NIS/dollar) of approximately $123 million with settlement dates through 2025-2026, designed to reduce cash-flow
exposure to the impact of exchange-rate fluctuations on firm commitments of approximately $123 million. In accordance with ASC 815-10,
we recorded in 2025 a decrease of approximately $3 million in fair market value in "Other Comprehensive Income". Short-term exposures
to changing foreign exchange rates are primarily due to operating cash flows denominated in foreign currencies and transactions denominated
in non-functional currencies. Our most significant foreign currency exposures are related to our operations in Israel. We have used foreign
exchange forward contracts to partially cover known and anticipated exposures. We estimate that an instantaneous 10% depreciation in NIS
from its level against the dollar as of December 31, 2025, with all other variables held constant, would decrease the fair value of our
net liabilities denominated in NIS, held at December 31, 2025, by approximately $16.1 million.
Item 12.
Description of Securities Other than Equity Securities
Not applicable.
PART II
Item 13.
Defaults, Dividend Arrearages and Delinquencies
None.
Item 14.
Material Modification to the Rights of Security Holders and Use of Proceeds
Not applicable.
Item 15.
Controls and Procedures
a) Our management, including
our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as
of December 31, 2025. The term “disclosure controls and procedures”, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the
Exchange Act, means controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports
that we file or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the
rules and forms of the SEC. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure
that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated
to the our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, or persons performing similar functions, as
appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Based on the foregoing, each of our chief executive officer and chief
financial officer have concluded that, as of December 31, 2025, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
b) Our management, under the
supervision of our chief executive officer and our chief financial officer, is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal
control over our financial reporting. The Company’s internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and
15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act, means a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting
and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Internal
control over financial reporting includes policies and procedures that:
| |
• |
pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately
and fairly reflect our transactions and asset dispositions; |
| |
• |
provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary
to permit the preparation of our financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that our receipts
and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and directors; and |
| |
• |
provide reasonable assurance regarding the prevention or timely detection
of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of assets that could have a material effect on our financial statements. Due to its inherent
limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. In addition, projections of any evaluation
of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that
the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. |
Our management evaluated the effectiveness of our internal control
over financial reporting as of December 31, 2025, based on the criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013) issued
by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Based on this evaluation, our management concluded that,
as of December 31, 2025, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective.
In accordance with guidance issued by the Securities and Exchange
Commission, companies are permitted to exclude acquisitions from their final assessment of internal control over financial reporting for
the first fiscal year in which the acquisition occurred. Our management’s evaluation of internal control over financial reporting
excluded the internal control activities of Sentronics which we acquired on January 30, 2025. Total assets subject to Sentronics’
internal control over financial reporting represented approximately 2% of our consolidated total assets (excluding acquired goodwill and
intangible assets) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025. Total revenues, subject to Sentronics’ internal control over financial
reporting represented approximately 6% of our consolidated total revenues for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025.
c) Kost Forer Gabbay & Kasierer,
an independent registered accounting firm and a member of EY Global, has issued an attestation report on the effectiveness of our
internal control over financial reporting, as stated in their report included herein. See “Report of Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm” on page F-6.
d) There were no changes in our
internal controls over financial reporting identified with the evaluation thereof that occurred during the period covered by this Annual
Report that have materially affected, or are reasonable likely to materially affect our internal control over financial reporting.
Item
16 [Reserved]
Item 16A.
Audit Committee Financial Expert
Our board of directors has determined that our
audit committee includes one audit committee financial expert, as defined by Item 16A of Form 20-F. Our board of directors has determined
that Ms. Sarit Sagiv is an “audit committee financial expert” as defined by the SEC rules as well as an independent director
as such term is defined by Rule 5605(a)(2) of the Nasdaq Stock Market and has the requisite financial experience as defined by the Nasdaq
rules.
Item 16B.
Code of Ethics
The Company has adopted a written code of conduct
that applies to all Company employees, including the Company’s directors, principal executive officer, principal financial officer
and principal accounting officer.
You
may review our code of conduct on our website: https://www.novami.com/, under “Investors/Corporate
Governance”. Information contained on, or that can be accessed through, our website does not constitute a part of this Annual Report.
Item 16C.
Principal Accountant Fees and Services
Since 2015, Kost Forer Gabbay & Kasierer,
an independent registered accounting firm and a member of EY Global (“Kost Forer Gabbay & Kasierer”) has acted as our
registered public accounting firm and independent auditors. The following table sets out the total amount of services rendered to us by
Kost Forer Gabbay & Kasierer, for all services, including audit services, for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2025:
|
|
|
2024 |
|
|
2025 |
|
|
Audit Fees |
|
|
776,000 |
|
|
|
1,296,000 |
|
|
Tax Fees |
|
|
23,000 |
|
|
|
197,000 |
|
|
Other Fees |
|
|
172,000 |
|
|
|
33,000 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
971,000 |
|
|
|
1,526,000 |
|
“Audit fees”
are fees associated with the annual audit of the Company consolidated financial statements and services that generally the independent
accountant provides, such as consultations on various accounting issues, performance of local statutory audits, fees associated with the
audit of management assessment of internal control over financial reporting, annual tax returns and audit of reports to IIA.
“Tax Fees”
are fees related to ad hoc tax consulting services and opinions.
“Other
Fees” mainly include services related to SEC regulation consulting and due diligence services.
Our audit committee
has adopted a pre-approval policy for the engagement of our independent accountant to perform certain services. Pursuant to this policy,
which is designed to assure that such engagements do not impair the independence of our auditors, all audit, audit related and tax services
must be specifically approved by the audit committee and certain other non-audit, non-audit related and non-tax services may be approved
without consideration of specific case-by-case provided certain terms and procedures are met. The Company’s audit committee approved
all of the services provided by Kost Forer Gabbay & Kasierer in fiscal years 2024 and 2025.
Item 16D. Exemptions from the
Listing Standards for Audit Committees
The Company has not obtained any exemption from
applicable audit committee listing standards.
Item 16E. Purchases of Equity
Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers
In
March 2022, we announced a $100 million repurchase program of our ordinary shares. Through December 31, 2025, we spent an aggregate of
$86.53 million to repurchase 560,001 ordinary shares under our share repurchase program. The following table provides information regarding
our repurchases of our ordinary shares for each month included in the period covered by this annual report on Form 20-F:
|
Period |
|
(a) Total Number of Ordinary Shares Purchased |
|
|
(b) Average Price Paid per Ordinary Share |
|
|
(c) Total Number of Ordinary Shares Purchased as Part
of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs |
|
|
(d) Approximate Dollar Value of Shares that
May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs (in millions) |
|
|
April 2025 |
|
|
93,029 |
|
|
|
214.99 |
|
|
|
506,530 |
|
|
|
28.47 |
|
|
November 2025 |
|
|
53,471 |
|
|
|
280.52 |
|
|
|
560,001 |
|
|
|
13.47 |
|
Item 16F.
Change in Registrant’s Certifying Accountant
None.
Item 16G.
Corporate Governance
There are no significant ways in which the Company’s
corporate governance practices differ from those followed by domestic companies listed on the Nasdaq Global Select Market.
Item 16H.
Mine Safety Disclosure
Not applicable.
Item 16I.
Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions that Prevent Inspections
Not applicable.