Armistice Capital and Steven Boyd File Schedule 13G/A Disclosing 4.99% of PDSB
Rhea-AI Filing Summary
Armistice Capital, LLC and Steven Boyd report beneficial ownership of 2,283,288 shares of PDS Biotechnology Corp (CUSIP 70465T107), representing 4.99% of the outstanding common stock. The filing states that Armistice Capital is the investment manager of Armistice Capital Master Fund Ltd., the direct holder of the shares, and that Armistice Capital and Mr. Boyd exercise shared voting and dispositive power over the reported shares while having no sole voting or dispositive power.
The Reporting Persons certify the shares were acquired in the ordinary course of business and not for the purpose of changing or influencing control of the issuer. The Schedule 13G/A is executed jointly by Armistice Capital and Steven Boyd and dated August 14, 2025.
Positive
- Disclosure of 4.99% ownership provides transparency about a significant institutional stake held via an Armistice Capital-managed master fund
- Joint filing and certifications clarify reporting responsibility and assert passive acquisition consistent with Schedule 13G treatment
Negative
- None.
Insights
TL;DR: A passive disclosure showing a sub-5% stake with shared voting and dispositive power; routine for an investment manager.
The Schedule 13G/A reports a 4.99% position held directly by a master fund for which Armistice Capital is investment manager, with shared voting and dispositive authority noted. Because the position is below 5%, the filing is consistent with passive investor status under the Exchange Act and carries limited governance influence. The certification that securities were acquired in the ordinary course of business supports a non-control intent, reducing immediate governance or strategic implications for PDSB.
TL;DR: Joint filing clarifies reporting responsibility; no indication of a control campaign or special arrangements.
The joint filing statement and signatures indicate coordinated reporting obligations between the manager and its managing member. Shared voting and dispositive power reflects managerial authority over the master fund's holdings, while the master fund disclaims direct beneficial ownership due to the investment management agreement. From a governance perspective, the disclosed stake does not trigger heightened disclosure or board-impact thresholds, though it documents a notable institutional holder.