STOCK TITAN
  1. Home
  2. Sec-filings
  3. PEGA
  4. [8-K] PEGASYSTEMS INC Reports Material Event

Virginia Supreme Court ruling in Appian case Pegasystems (NASDAQ: PEGA)

Filing Impact
(Moderate)
Filing Sentiment
(Neutral)
Form Type
8-K

Rhea-AI Filing Summary

Pegasystems Inc. reports a legal development in its dispute with Appian Corp. On January 8, 2026, the Supreme Court of Virginia unanimously affirmed a July 30, 2024 decision by the Court of Appeals of Virginia that had reversed the prior judgment for Appian on the Virginia Uniform Trade Secrets Act (VUTSA) claims in the case Appian Corp. v. Pegasystems Inc. and Youyong Zou. The Supreme Court ordered the case to be sent back for a retrial consistent with its opinion.

On the same date, Pegasystems sent an internal email to employees regarding this lawsuit, which is included as Exhibit 99.1 to the report.

Positive

  • None.

Negative

  • None.
Item 8.01 Other Events Other
Voluntary disclosure of events the company deems important to shareholders but not covered by other items.
Item 9.01 Financial Statements and Exhibits Exhibits
Financial statements, pro forma financial information, and exhibit attachments filed with this report.
Understanding 8-K Material Events →
false000101385700010138572026-01-082026-01-08


UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549 
____________________
 FORM 8-K
____________________

Current Report
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): January 8, 2026
____________________
PEGASYSTEMS INC.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
____________________
Massachusetts1-1185904-2787865
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)(Commission File Number)(IRS Employer Identification No.)
225 Wyman Street, Waltham, MA 02451
(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)

(617) 374-9600
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Not Applicable
(Former name or former address, if changed since last report)

Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the Registrant under any of the following provisions:
☐Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)
☐Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)
☐Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))
☐Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each classTrading symbol(s)Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock, $.01 par value per sharePEGANASDAQ Global Select Market
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is an emerging growth company as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act of 1933 (§230.405 of this chapter) or Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (§240.12b-2 of this chapter).                         
                                                Emerging growth company ☐
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the Registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐


Item 8.01. Other Events
On January 8, 2026, the Supreme Court of Virginia unanimously affirmed in full the July 30, 2024 decision of the Court of Appeals of Virginia reversing the judgment for Appian Corp. on the VUTSA claims in the case titled Appian Corp. v. Pegasystems Inc. and Youyong Zou, Circuit Court of Fairfax County, Virginia. The Supreme Court ordered the matter to be remanded for retrial consistent with its opinion.

On January 8, 2026, Pegasystems Inc. sent to its employees the email attached as Exhibit 99.1 with respect to the lawsuit styled Appian Corp. v. Pegasystems Inc. & Youyong Zou.

Item 9.01     Financial Statements and Exhibits
Exhibit No.Description
99.1
Email to employees of Pegasystems Inc. January 8, 2026
104
Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as Inline XBRL)



SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
 
Pegasystems Inc.
Dated:January 9, 2026By:
/s/ KENNETH STILLWELL
Kenneth Stillwell
Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)


Source: View Original Filing on SEC EDGAR

FAQ

How did the Virginia Supreme Court rule in the Appian v. Pegasystems (PEGA) case?

The Supreme Court of Virginia unanimously affirmed in full the Court of Appeals of Virginia’s July 30, 2024 decision that reversed the judgment for Appian Corp. on the VUTSA claims and directed that the case be remanded for retrial consistent with its opinion.

What is the next procedural step in the Appian v. Pegasystems (PEGA) litigation?

The Supreme Court of Virginia ordered that the case Appian Corp. v. Pegasystems Inc. and Youyong Zou be remanded for a retrial consistent with the Supreme Court’s opinion.

Did Pegasystems (PEGA) communicate this court decision internally?

Yes. On January 8, 2026, Pegasystems sent an email to its employees regarding the lawsuit Appian Corp. v. Pegasystems Inc. & Youyong Zou, which is filed as Exhibit 99.1.

Which claims were affected by the Virginia Supreme Court decision involving Pegasystems (PEGA)?

The decision relates to the Virginia Uniform Trade Secrets Act (VUTSA) claims in the case titled Appian Corp. v. Pegasystems Inc. and Youyong Zou.