Quoin proposes 9.99% warrant ownership cap
Each proposal requires a majority of shares voted for approval, and a quorum requires at least 33⅓% of voting power.
Sentiment and the balance of points
Rhea-AI Sentiment reads the wording of the document, how positive or negative its language is on a 1 to 5 scale. The balance of points shown with the takes weighs what the document actually discloses, so the two can disagree, for example when a trial that missed its main goal is described in upbeat language.
Quoin Pharmaceuticals Ltd. is asking shareholders to amend the beneficial ownership and corresponding voting-power limits on warrants from its private placements consummated on October 14, 2025 and August 31, 2026. If approved, holders could, upon written notice, set limits from 4.99% to any percentage not exceeding 9.99%.
An increase would take effect on the 61st day after notice; holders could also decrease the limit applicable to any portion of their warrants. The board recommends a “FOR” vote on both the amendment and a proposal to adjourn if needed to solicit more votes. Quoin says shares issued upon warrant exercise would dilute existing shareholders’ voting power and economic rights, and sales of resulting ADSs could affect market prices.
The special meeting is scheduled for November 12, 2026, with a record date of September 23, 2026. If the ownership-limit proposal fails, the limits remain at 4.99%; holders reaching that threshold may need to sell shares before exercising more warrants, which could slow exercises and delay proceeds to Quoin.
How this balance works
Rhea-AI gives every point it takes from this document a weight. Minor counts 1, Moderate 3 and Major 9, so one Major point outweighs several Minor ones. The bar adds up the weights on each side, and when neither side holds more than 65% of the total the balance reads Mixed.
It reads the document as published, with the same rules for every company, and it does not look at what the market expected or at how the stock traded, so a point can be objectively good on a day the stock falls.
Rhea-AI Sentiment measures something else, the tone of the wording.
Hollow bars mark forward-looking points. How the balance works
Positive
- None.
Negative
- Moderate point. Forward-looking: it has not happened yet and may not happen.The proposed 9.99% cap could permit additional warrant exercises and dilution.
Filing Explained
At this stage, the proposal is only for a vote: Quoin says the warrants count as exercised for the relevant Israeli Companies Law test, so approval would supply the shareholder consent contemplated for warrant exercises that take a holder above 5%; no warrant is exercised by this vote.
Key Figures
Key Terms
Beneficial Ownership Limitation regulatory
Pre-Funded Warrants financial
as-exercised basis regulatory
broker non-vote regulatory
appraisal rights regulatory
Compensation Summary
- Approve changes to the beneficial ownership and corresponding voting-power limits on private placement warrants, from 4.99% to any percentage not exceeding 9.99%, upon written notice.
- Approve adjournment of the Special Meeting, if necessary or appropriate, for further proxy solicitation and voting on Proposal 1.
FAQ
AI-generated questions and answers. How Rhea-AI works. Not financial advice.
What ownership limit is QNRX asking shareholders to approve?
When would an increased QNRX warrant ownership limit take effect?
What happens if QNRX shareholders do not approve Proposal 1?
What vote is needed to approve the QNRX proposals?
AI-generated analysis. How Rhea-AI works. Not financial advice.
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Chairman of the Board of Directors and
Chief Executive Officer
for the Special Meeting of Shareholders
to be held on Thursday, November 12, 2026 at 12:00 p.m., US Eastern Time,
at the offices of Blank Rome LLP located at One Logan Square, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103
https://investors.quoinpharma.com/proxy-statement
Chairman of the Board of Directors
and Chief Executive Officer
| |
Proxy Statement Summary
|
| | | | 1 | | |
| |
Questions and Answers About These Proxy Materials and Voting
|
| | | | 2 | | |
| |
Proposal 1 – The Beneficial Ownership Limitation Amendment Proposal
|
| | | | 6 | | |
| |
Proposal 2 – The Adjournment Proposal
|
| | | | 9 | | |
| |
Beneficial Ownership of Securities By Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
|
| | | | 10 | | |
| |
Shareholder Proposals
|
| | | | 12 | | |
| |
Householding of Proxy Materials
|
| | | | 12 | | |
| |
Other Business
|
| | | | 13 | | |
FOR THE SPECIAL GENERAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
TO BE HELD ON THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 12, 2026
| |
Date and Time:
|
| | Thursday, November 12, 2026, beginning at 12:00 p.m., US Eastern Time | |
| |
Meeting Place:
|
| | Offices of Blank Rome LLP located at One Logan Square, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103 | |
| |
Record Date:
|
| | September 23, 2026 | |
| |
Voting:
|
| | Each ordinary share is entitled to one vote per share on all matters presented at the Special Meeting. Each ADS represents thirty-five of our ordinary shares. | |
|
Agenda Item
|
| |
Board Vote
Recommendation |
| |
Page
Reference |
|
| Proposal 1: To approve a proposal to amend the beneficial ownership limitations imposed on each investor in the transaction documents entered into in connection with the Company’s private placement transactions consummated on October 14, 2025 and August 31, 2026, as applicable, to permit each such investor, upon written notice to the Company, to increase its applicable beneficial ownership limitations (including any corresponding limitations on voting power) from 4.99% to any percentage not exceeding 9.99% of the number of the Company’s outstanding Ordinary Shares (including Ordinary Shares represented by ADSs), determined immediately after giving effect to the issuance of the applicable securities, for purposes of both Section 13(d) of the Exchange Act and Section 270(5) and Section 274 of the Companies Law. | | |
FOR
|
| |
6
|
|
| Proposal 2: To approve an adjournment of the Special Meeting to a later date, if necessary or appropriate, to permit further solicitation and vote of proxies in the event that there are insufficient votes for, or otherwise in connection with, the approval of Proposal 1. | | |
FOR
|
| |
9
|
|
THE BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP LIMITATION AMENDMENT PROPOSAL
THE ADJOURNMENT PROPOSAL
APPROVAL OF THE ADJOURNMENT PROPOSAL.
CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
|
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner
|
| |
Amount and Nature of
Beneficial Ownership |
| |
Percentage
of Class |
| ||||||
| Directors and Named Executive Officers: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Dr. Michael Myers(1)
|
| | | | 92,933 | | | | | | 1.91% | | |
|
Denise Carter(2)
|
| | | | 92,929 | | | | | | 1.91% | | |
|
Joseph Cooper(3)
|
| | | | 2,005 | | | | | | * | | |
|
James Culverwell(4)
|
| | | | 53,892 | | | | | | 1.12% | | |
|
Dr. Dennis Langer(5)
|
| | | | 115,037 | | | | | | 2.36% | | |
|
Natalie Leong(6)
|
| | | | 2,826 | | | | | | * | | |
|
Michael Sember(7)
|
| | | | 2,005 | | | | | | * | | |
|
Sally Lawlor(8)
|
| | | | 15,806 | | | | | | * | | |
|
All current directors and officers as a group (8 persons)(9)
|
| | | | 377,433 | | | | | | 7.54% | | |
Chairman of the Board of Directors
and Chief Executive Officer
https://investors.quoinpharma.com/proxy-statement
QUOIN PHARMACEUTICALS LTD.
PLEASE MARK YOUR VOTE IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS SHOWN HERE ☒
A VOTE “FOR” EACH OF PROPOSALS 1 AND 2.
| | | | | | |
For
|
| |
Against
|
| |
Abstain
|
|
| Proposal 1 | | | To approve a proposal to amend the beneficial ownership limitations imposed on each investor in the transaction documents entered into in connection with the Company’s private placement transactions consummated on October 14, 2025 and August 31, 2026, as applicable, to permit each such investor, upon written notice to the Company, to increase its applicable beneficial ownership limitations (including any corresponding limitations on voting power) from 4.99% to any percentage not exceeding 9.99% of the number of the Company’s outstanding Ordinary Shares (including Ordinary Shares represented by ADSs), determined immediately after giving effect to the issuance of the applicable securities, for purposes of both Section 13(d) of the Exchange Act and Section 270(5) and Section 274 of the Companies Law. | | |
☐
|
| |
☐
|
| |
☐
|
|
| Proposal 2 | | | To approve an adjournment of the Special Meeting to a later date, if necessary or appropriate, to permit further solicitation and vote of proxies in the event that there are insufficient votes for, or otherwise in connection with, the approval of Proposal 1. | | |
☐
|
| |
☐
|
| |
☐
|
|
| |
Name
|
| |
Signature
|
| |
Date
|
| | , 2026 | |
| |
Name
|
| |
Signature
|
| |
Date
|
| | , 2026 | |