SANM Form 4: Director Disposes 755 Shares Under 10b5-1 Plan
Rhea-AI Filing Summary
Susan A. Johnson, a director of Sanmina Corp (SANM), reported a sale of 755 shares of the company on 08/29/2025 at an exact price of $119.04 per share. After this transaction she beneficially owned 8,827 shares in a direct capacity. The filing indicates the sale was made pursuant to a plan intended to satisfy the Rule 10b5-1 affirmative defense. The Form 4 was executed by an attorney-in-fact on 09/02/2025. The disclosure is a routine Section 16 reporting of an insider disposition and provides the specific quantities and price of the trade.
Positive
- Transaction disclosed under Rule 10b5-1, indicating the sale was made pursuant to a pre-established plan
- Precise reporting of price and quantity (755 shares at $119.04), supporting transparency
- Post-transaction beneficial ownership provided (8,827 shares), allowing clear update of insider holdings
Negative
- Director reduced direct holdings by 755 shares, which modestly lowers insider ownership
Insights
TL;DR: Director sold a small block of shares under a 10b5-1 plan; transaction is transparent and likely routine.
The sale of 755 shares at $119.04 reduces the director's direct holdings to 8,827 shares. Because the Form 4 checks the box indicating a 10b5-1 plan, the transaction appears pre-planned rather than opportunistic, which limits informational content for short-term signals. This disclosure is precise about price and quantity, enabling investors to update insider ownership figures. The transaction size should be assessed relative to total outstanding shares for materiality, which is not provided here.
TL;DR: Reporting follows Section 16 mechanics and cites a Rule 10b5-1 plan, consistent with strong disclosure practice.
The Form 4 documents the director's disposition and marks the contract/plan box, which supports compliance with insider trading policies. Execution by an attorney-in-fact is clearly indicated and the filing supplies the post-transaction beneficial ownership. There is no indication of amendment or irregularity in the filing itself. Without additional context on timing or aggregate insider activity, governance implications are limited to standard transparency and policy adherence.