[SCHEDULE 13G/A] Scinai Immunotherapeutics Ltd. SEC Filing
Scinai Immunotherapeutics Ltd. (SCNI) Schedule 13G/A reports that Daniel E. Stone and RK Stone Miami, LLC disclosed beneficial ownership in the issuer's American Depositary Shares, each representing 4,000 ordinary shares. Daniel E. Stone reports 346,667 ADSs (9.9%) and RK Stone Miami, LLC reports 282,467 ADSs (8.1%). The filing notes RK holds a mix of directly held ADSs and ADSs issuable upon exercise of pre-funded warrants and that exercise is limited to avoid beneficial ownership above 9.99%. The filers certify the holdings were not acquired to influence control.
- Transparent disclosure of beneficial ownership by Daniel E. Stone and RK Stone Miami, LLC
- Detailed breakdown of sole voting and dispositive powers and exact ADS counts
- Certification that the holdings were not acquired to influence control (Schedule 13G/A posture)
- Beneficial ownership approaches 9.99% threshold, and pre-funded warrant exercises are limited to avoid exceeding that cap, which could constrain future positioning
Insights
TL;DR: Two related reporting persons disclosed near-10% passive stakes in SCNI, with warrant exercise limited to avoid breaching a 9.99% cap.
The filing shows transparent reporting of sizable positions: Daniel E. Stone at 9.9% and RK Stone Miami, LLC at 8.1% of ADSs. The disclosure that pre-funded warrants are subject to an exercise limitation to prevent exceeding 9.99% is important for share dilution modeling and ownership concentration analysis. Because the statement is filed on Schedule 13G/A and includes a certification that the holdings are not for control, this is a passive holding disclosure rather than an active takeover intent signal.
TL;DR: Ownership levels are material enough to warrant governance monitoring but the filing asserts no control intent.
The combined disclosures indicate concentrated insider-affiliated ownership that may affect shareholder voting dynamics if stakes change. The explicit limitation on warrant exercise to remain below 9.99% reduces immediate control risk but creates a potential trigger point if additional issuances or exercises alter percentages. The joint filing agreement exhibit and signatures from the same individual confirm coordinated reporting.