SCSC Form 4: Stephen Jones Withholds Shares for Taxes, Net Holdings Increase
Rhea-AI Filing Summary
Stephen Jones, Senior EVP & CFO of ScanSource, Inc. (SCSC), reported insider transactions. On 08/30/2025 he had 1,521 shares disposed at $43.65 (reported under transaction code F) and held 70,713 shares after that disposition. On 09/01/2025 he acquired 17,633 shares at $0.00, bringing his total beneficial ownership to 88,346 shares. The filing explains the disposition reflected shares withheld to satisfy tax withholding upon RSU vesting, a non-market transaction. The Form 4 was signed by an attorney-in-fact on 09/03/2025.
Positive
- Beneficial ownership increased from 70,713 to 88,346 shares after the reported transactions
- Transactions are compensation-related (RSU vesting), indicating alignment of executive pay with shareholder interest
- Filing discloses the tax-withholding explanation, providing transparency about the nature of the disposition
Negative
- Shares were withheld (1,521) to satisfy tax obligations, which reduced immediately available holdings
- Form filed by attorney-in-fact, which requires reliance on representative signature rather than the reporting person in this filing
Insights
TL;DR: Insider tax-withholding and vesting changed holdings modestly; no market-sale signal beyond withholding.
The reported transactions show a non-market disposition (shares withheld for tax on vesting) and a subsequent acquisition of vested shares recorded at $0.00, consistent with RSU settlement. Net change increased beneficial ownership from 70,713 to 88,346 shares, a clear post-vesting balance update. There is no indication of a voluntary open-market sale in this filing; the disposition is described as tax-related. For investors, these are routine equity-compensation mechanics rather than strategic insider buying or selling.
TL;DR: Transactions are standard compensation-related reporting; governance controls appear to be followed.
The Form 4 documents compliance with Section 16 reporting for an executive officer. The explanation explicitly states the disposition was to satisfy tax withholding on RSU vesting, a common practice. The form was executed by an attorney-in-fact, which is permissible but worth noting for recordkeeping. No departures from expected governance procedures are evident from the filing alone.