SKECHERS (SKX) Insider: Unvested Shares Converted to $63 Cash in Merger
Rhea-AI Filing Summary
Zulema Garcia, a director of SKECHERS USA INC (SKX), reported on 09/12/2025 the cancellation and disposition of Class A common stock holdings under the parties' Merger Agreement dated May 2, 2025. Unvested shares and shares underlying unvested restricted stock units were cancelled and exchanged for a cash merger consideration of $63.00 per share. The reporting shows the affected shares were disposed of in accordance with the merger terms and, following the reported transactions and elections, the reporting person’s beneficial ownership of the referenced Class A common stock is 0 shares.
Positive
- Merger consideration of $63.00 per share provides a clear, fixed cash outcome for the cancelled unvested shares and RSUs
- Compliance with reporting obligations: Form 4 documents the transaction and the reporting person’s election under the merger agreement
Negative
- Reporting person’s beneficial ownership reduced to 0 shares for the reported Class A common stock holdings following the transaction
Insights
TL;DR Director disposed of previously unvested equity as part of the announced merger, receiving $63.00 per share in cash.
The Form 4 documents the administrative exchange of unvested shares and RSU-underlying shares for the contractual cash merger consideration. This filing does not report trading for price discovery or discretionary insider selling; it reflects the mechanics of a corporate transaction that eliminated the reported holdings. For investors, the key fact is the fixed per-share cash consideration of $63.00, which finalizes compensation for those specific equity instruments.
TL;DR This is a governance-level compliance filing showing equity cancellation under the merger, leaving the director with no reported shares from these grants.
The Form 4 is procedural: it confirms that unvested equity and RSU-linked shares held by the director were treated per the Merger Agreement and converted to cash. The filing provides transparency regarding insiders’ post-merger holdings and confirms election choices under the merger terms. It does not indicate voluntary insider trading or a change in board status; it records the contractual outcome of the acquisition.