[Form 4] Snowflake Inc. Insider Trading Activity
Rhea-AI Filing Summary
Snowflake Inc. (SNOW) – Form 4 insider filing.
President of Products and Director Benoit Dageville reported a gift of 7,500 common shares on 30 June 2025 under a Rule 10b5-1 plan. The transfer, recorded at $0.00, moved the shares to The Snow Trust, a vehicle where he serves as trustee. Following the transaction, Dageville still beneficially owns roughly 4.74 million SNOW shares (3.18 M in The Snow Trust, 750 k in Thira GRAT, 750 k in Selene GRAT, and 58,325 unvested RSUs), so the disposed amount equals only about 0.16 % of his total holdings.
No open-market sales, purchases, or derivative exercises were reported. Because the change is immaterial to Dageville’s stake and involves no cash proceeds, the event is best viewed as routine estate or tax planning with negligible impact on the company’s share structure or market perception.
Positive
- Executive retains a substantial stake (~4.74 M shares), maintaining alignment with shareholders.
Negative
- Minor reduction (7,500 shares) in insider ownership, though immaterial.
Insights
TL;DR: 7,500-share gift; no sale; Dageville still holds ~4.7 M shares; market impact negligible.
The filing shows a small, zero-price transfer to a trust under a 10b5-1 plan. With the executive retaining the vast majority of his position, the move does not signal bearish sentiment or liquidity needs. No derivative activity appears, and there is no influence on Snowflake’s free float or insider ownership concentration of note. I classify the development as routine and non-market-moving.
TL;DR: Routine trust gift; estate-planning step; corporate-governance risk unchanged.
The transaction code G indicates a bona fide gift, typically executed for estate or philanthropic purposes. Compliance boxes—Form 4 timing, 10b5-1 reference, attorney-in-fact signature—are all in order, suggesting sound governance practices. Because the executive’s aggregate holdings remain substantial, alignment with shareholder interests is preserved. I see no red or green flags that would alter governance assessments.