The Innovent Agreement contemplates that the Company will enter into ancillary arrangements with Innovent, including a clinical supply agreement and a pharmacovigilance agreement. The Company has also granted Innovent a right of first negotiation to be a secondary manufacturer of the Licensed Compounds and Licensed Products for commercialization in the Licensed Territory.
Unless earlier terminated, the Innovent Agreement will expire on the expiration of the last to expire Royalty Term. Unless the Innovent Agreement is earlier terminated, on expiration of each applicable Royalty Term, the Company will have a fully paid-up, irrevocable and perpetual license under the Licensed Intellectual Property to develop, manufacture and commercialize each applicable Licensed Product in the applicable country, which license will become non-exclusive after a specified point in time. Either party may terminate the Innovent Agreement for the other party’s uncured material breach, following a customary notice and cure period, or insolvency. Innovent may terminate the Innovent Agreement if the Company challenges the scope, validity, or enforceability of the licensed patents. The Company may terminate the Innovent Agreement for any reason upon 90 days’ written notice to Innovent prior to the first commercial sale of a Licensed Product, or upon 150 days’ written notice to Innovent after the first commercial sale of a Licensed Product. Additionally, if the Company has the right to terminate the Innovent Agreement for certain uncured material breaches by Innovent, the Company may, in lieu of termination, elect to keep the Innovent Agreement in force and reduce the Company’s subsequent payment obligations. Upon a termination of the Innovent Agreement prior to expiration of an applicable Royalty Term, the Company’s licenses from Innovent will terminate and Innovent will have the right to obtain a license under the Spero Intellectual Property, with a right to sublicense, with respect to specified terminated products, which license will be either non-exclusive and fully paid-up or exclusive and subject to milestone and royalty obligations, at Innovent’s election.
The foregoing description of the Innovent Agreement does not purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the Innovent Agreement, a copy of which will be filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2026.
SP001
SP001 (IBI355) is a third-generation, fully humanized, Fc-silent IgG1 monoclonal antibody targeting CD40L, an upstream immune activation signal involved in T-cell, B-cell, antigen-presenting cell, and platelet biology. SP001 is designed to address platelet activation concerns associated with earlier anti-CD40L antibodies, while preserving key monoclonal antibody properties, including FcRn interaction that supports IgG-like half-life.
Innovent has evaluated this antibody in two healthy volunteer Phase 1 trials: a single ascending dose (“SAD”) study and a multiple ascending dose (“MAD”) study. It has also evaluated SP001 in a Phase 1b MAD study in patients with primary Sjögren’s disease (“SjD”). Data from the Phase 1b SjD study were presented in a poster session at the EULAR 2026 Congress.
The Company currently expects to advance SP001 into a Phase 2 trial in patients with Immunoglobulin G4 related disease (“IgG4-RD”) in the second quarter of 2027. IgG4-related disease is a serious, chronic fibroinflammatory condition that can affect multiple organs, including the pancreas, salivary glands, lacrimal glands, kidneys, lungs, lymph nodes, and other tissues. The disease can cause immune-mediated inflammation, fibrosis, organ damage, relapse risk, and significant treatment burden.
The Company believes there is a broad range of other indications for SP001, including in SjD. Innovent plans to initiate a Phase 2 trial in China for SjD by early 2027, and the Company may opt to expand into this indication at a later date. The Company may also explore other therapeutic areas where the Company believes targeting CD40L presents a compelling biological rationale to impact disease progression.
Royalty Financing Agreements
On July 8, 2026 (the “Closing Date”), the Company, Spero Holdings SPV, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and wholly owned subsidiary of the Company (“Holdings”), and Spero SPV, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and wholly owned subsidiary of Holdings (“Issuer”), entered into the following agreements with affiliates of Healthcare Royalty Management, LLC: (i) a non-recourse Note Purchase and Guaranty Agreement (the
“NPA”), by and among Holdings, Issuer, the purchasers party thereto (the “NPA Purchasers”) and HCR Spero SPV, LLC, as the purchaser representative for such NPA Purchasers (the “NPA Purchaser Representative”), (ii) a Royalty and Milestone Payment Interest Purchase and Sale Agreement (the “RPA”), by and among Issuer, the purchasers party thereto (the “RPA Purchasers”), and HCR Spero SPV, LLC, as the purchaser representative for such RPA Purchasers (the “RPA Purchaser Representative”) and (iii) a Limited Recourse Guaranty (the “Limited Guaranty”), by the Company in favor of the NPA Purchaser Representative and RPA Purchaser Representative.
Immediately prior to the Company’s entry into the NPA and RPA, the Company: (i) transferred to Issuer that certain Exclusive License Agreement between the Company and GlaxoSmithKline Intellectual Property (No. 3) Limited (“GSK”), dated as of September 21, 2022 (as amended, the “GSK Agreement”), which provides GSK certain rights to develop and commercialize the tebipenem HBr program, and intellectual property, including license rights, related thereto and (ii) transferred to Holdings the Company’s equity interests in Issuer. Holdings and Issuer are both special purpose vehicles, whose purposes are limited to entering into and performing their obligations under the NPA, RPA and the transaction documents related thereto.
Under the terms of the NPA, Issuer sold to the NPA Purchasers, on the Closing Date, senior secured notes in an aggregate principal amount of $105,000,000 (the “Notes”), which Notes (i) were issued net of an original issue discount in the amount of $3,150,000, which, after giving effect to the RPA Purchase Price referenced below, reduces the aggregate $105,000,000 in gross proceeds of the NPA and RPA by 1.5%, (ii) accrue interest at 10% per annum, which interest, to the extent not paid in cash from available GSK Proceeds (as defined below) in accordance with the terms of the NPA, is capitalized and added to the principal amount of the Notes on a quarterly basis and (iii) mature nine years after the Closing Date. The Notes are secured by substantially all of Holdings’ and Issuer’s assets (collectively, the “Collateral”), which includes the equity interest of Issuer held by Holdings and rights to certain milestone and royalty payments (the “GSK Proceeds”) arising under the GSK Agreement, but excludes intellectual property as to which the grant of security interests is restricted. The Notes and other obligations under the NPA are generally payable solely from the GSK Proceeds, unless voluntarily prepaid at the option of Issuer prior to maturity with a premium or subject to certain mandatory prepayment triggers and foreclosure rights.
Under the terms of the RPA, Issuer sold to the RPA Purchasers, on the Closing Date, 65% of the GSK Proceeds arising after the payment in full of the Notes (the “Purchased Proceeds”) in exchange for a cash payment of $1,575,000 (the “RPA Purchase Price”). Issuer’s obligations under the RPA are secured by a customary back-up lien in the Purchased Proceeds and proceeds thereof. The Company retains an interest in 35% of the GSK Proceeds arising after payment in full of the Notes.
Issuer transferred substantially all proceeds received from the NPA Purchasers and RPA Purchasers in connection with these transactions to the Company as consideration for the asset transfers made by the Company to Holdings and Issuer.
Pursuant to the Limited Guaranty, the Company guarantees, subject to limitations set forth therein, the obligations of Issuer and Holdings under the NPA and RPA. In connection with the NPA and RPA, the Company will provide certain servicing, management and administrative functions on behalf of Holdings and Issuer.
Each of the NPA, RPA and Limited Guaranty contain certain customary terms and conditions, including representations and warranties, indemnities, affirmative and negative covenants, and events of default. Upon the occurrence and during the continuance of an event of default under the NPA, the NPA Purchaser Representative may declare the Notes and other obligations under the NPA to be immediately due and payable, and if such Notes and other obligations are not repaid, foreclose on the Collateral and use the proceeds thereof to repay the Notes, and, in limited circumstances, seek payment from the Company pursuant to the Limited Guaranty. The obligations of the Company in respect of the Limited Guaranty in circumstances where the Company is liable are, except in very limited circumstances, subject to a cap and limited to contract breaches, defaults and other liabilities customary for similarly structured royalty financing transactions.
The foregoing descriptions of the NPA, the RPA and the Limited Guaranty and related documents do not purport to be complete and are qualified in their entirety by reference to the full texts of the NPA, the RPA and the Limited Guaranty, copies of which will be filed as exhibits to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2026.

Corporate Presentation July 2026
Exhibit 99.3

This presentation contains
“forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, including statements regarding future expectations, plans and prospects for the Company; the ability to successfully achieve and
execute on the Company’s goals, priorities and preclinical and clinical milestones; the Company’s expectations regarding the potential therapeutic benefits of SP001; the potential benefits from the Company’s current or future
arrangements with third parties, including the anticipated benefits from the in-license of SP001; the Company’s expectations for clinical and pre-clinical development, trial design, additional Investigational New Drug (IND) filings, expansion
into additional indications and geographies, the enrollment in clinical trials, and availability of clinical trial data; and other statements containing the words “anticipate,” “believe,” “continue,”
“could,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “may,” “plan,” “potential,” “predict,” “project,” “should,” “target,”
“would,” “working” and similar expressions. Any forward-looking statements are based on management’s current expectations of future events and are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual
results to differ materially and adversely from those set forth in, or implied by, such forward-looking statements. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, risks associated with the Company’s ability to advance SP001 on
the timelines expected or at all; obtain and maintain necessary and desirable approvals from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and other regulatory authorities; implement the clinical plan for SP001, which is largely based on data
generated by the licensor, Innovent Biologics, Inc., and may change based on data we observe which may be materially and adversely different compared to the results Innovent provided to the Company; compete successfully with other companies that are
seeking to develop IgG4-related disease and Sjögren’s disease; raise the substantial additional capital needed, on the timeline necessary, to support development efforts and ongoing operations; manage expenses; maintain and defend our
intellectual property rights for SP001 or any other product candidate; and the anticipated benefits of the non-recourse non-dilutive royalty-backed financing, including the anticipated use of proceeds. For a discussion of other risks and
uncertainties, and other important factors, any of which could cause the Company’s actual results to differ materially from those contained in the forward-looking statements, see the “Risk Factors” section, as well as discussions
of potential risks, uncertainties and other important factors, in the Company’s most recent filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. In addition, the forward-looking statements included in this presentation represent the
Company’s views as of the date hereof and should not be relied upon as representing the Company’s views as of any date subsequent to the date hereof. The Company anticipates that subsequent events and developments will cause the
Company’s views to change. However, while the Company may elect to update these forward-looking statements at any point in the future, the Company specifically disclaims any obligation to do so. This presentation contains estimates and other
statistical data made by independent parties and by us relating to market size and other data about our industry. This data involves a number of assumptions and limitations, and you are cautioned not to give undue weight to such data and estimates.
The Company has not independently verified the accuracy and completeness of the information obtained by third parties included in this presentation. In addition, projections, assumptions and estimates of our future performance and the future
performance of the markets in which we operate are necessarily subject to a high degree of uncertainty and risk. SP001 is known as IBI 355 prior to the closing of the in-licensing agreement with Innovent. Cautionary Note Regarding Forward Looking
Statements and Disclaimer

Developing Novel Medicines for
Immune-Mediated Diseases Established operational and public company infrastructure SP001, a third-generation Fc-silent anti-CD40L mAb with potential for development across a range of immune-mediated diseases Cash runway into 2H 2029 Lead
indication in IgG4-related disease (IgG4-RD)

Key Investment Highlights: SP001
Sjögren’s disease, additional rheumatological applications, and applications in non-rheumatological therapeutic areas Target with human proof-of-concept in several autoimmune diseases Differentiated mechanism compared to other B-cell
targeting agents Preclinical data show high potency compared to key competitors Completed 2 healthy volunteer trials and Phase 1b in Sjögren’s disease Expansion opportunities Lead program in IgG4-RD Phase 2 ready antibody Potential
best-in-class profile CD40L validated target

Indication Exploratory Phase 1 Phase 2
Phase 3 Catalyst / Expected timing IgG4-RD Phase 2 initiation Q2 2027 Sjögren’s disease (Innovent)* Phase 2 initiation by early 2027 * Development in greater China SP001 Development Plan for Rheumatological Disorders

Adapted from Laman JD, Molloy M,
Noelle RJ. Switching off autoimmunity. Science. 2024 Aug 23;385(6711):827-829. CD28/CD80–CD86 T-cell co-stimulation not shown for clarity CD40-CD40L System: A Master Regulator of Immunity Antigen presentation: CD4 T cells present a CD40L
“go” signal to antigen presenting cells (APC), promoting inflammation. SP001 thus blocks an upstream signal that sustains autoimmunity. B cells: SP001 blocks the upstream CD40L signal required for B cell survival, antibody
production, cytokine secretion, and antigen presentation back to T cells SP001 blocks the immune-activating CD40/CD40L signals between CD4 & CD8 T cells and between CD8 T cells and APC

Sources: Wallace ZS et al. Ann Rheum
Dis 2023; Stone JH et al. NEJM 2012; Lanzillotta M. et al. Rheumatology 2020.; De IgG4-RD DelveInsight Epidemiology, 2024. CD40L Mechanism Provides Multiple Development Opportunities Phase 2 ready in Sjögren's disease Additional
rheumatological diseases Exploratory applications in non-rheumatological therapeutic areas Under-explored therapeutic areas may provide attractive entry points for longer-term expansion Rare chronic disease with fibroinflammatory burden leading to
organ failure Substantial treatment burden with high relapse rates Approved therapy and agents in development target B-cells CD40L blockade affects both B and T cells; potential for use as chronic disease modifying therapy IgG4-Related Disease
(IgG4-RD) Potential Expansion Opportunities

SP001 1,2. Lists may not be all
inclusive. 2. Initiated by other industry sponsors developing CD40L targeting agents. Preliminary Indications Selected Offer Attractive Competitive Dynamics Spero’s Potential Development1 Ongoing Clinical Trials in Additional Indications2
IgG4-related disease – Sjögren’s disease Sjögren’s disease Type 1 diabetes Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Transplant rejection Thyroid eye disease Multiple sclerosis

SP001 Overview

SP001 is an IgG1 mAb designed to be
Fc-silent (ΔP-LALA) No detectible Fc receptor and complement binding, eliminating platelet activation Normal FcRn interactions are preserved à IgG-like half-life Constant fragment (Fc) domain interacted w/ FcgRIIa on platelets, the
putative MOA for the increased risk of thrombosis First-generation (ex. Ruplizumab) Second-generation (ex. Dazodalibep) Third-generation SP001 SP001 Is a Third-Generation, Fully Humanized, Fc-silent CD40L mAb Modified to Silence the Fc Region SP001
combines high affinity and selectivity with preserved mAb functionality and PK properties, while engineering out the Fc-region pathogenic sequence Alternative modalities utilized non-antibody formats to avoid Fc receptor binding. Most assets lack
beneficial drug properties of mAbs (half-life, low ADA, CMC, etc.)* Active Fc Region Tn3 Tn3 HSA *Aglycosyl ruplizumab (Fc modified IgG1) considered 2nd Gen

SP001 demonstrated superior immune
suppression in anti-KLH immunization model compared to leading Phase 3 mAb Anti-KLH (keyhole limpet hemocyanin) antibody evaluates immune function by measuring IgM (early response) and IgG (later response) antibodies following
vaccination. Saghari M, Gal P, Ziagkos D, et al. A randomized controlled trial with a delayed-type hypersensitivity model using keyhole limpet haemocyanin to evaluate adaptive immune responses in man. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2021;87:1953–1962.
SP001 Presents Potent Immune Suppression In Vivo in-vivo immune response assay hlgG SP001-0.3mpk SP001-1mpk SP001-3mpk Frexalimab -3mpk Anti-KLH (ug/ml) (Human CD40L/CD40 mice) Anti-KLH response KLH

1. Phase 1b MAD in
Sjögren’s disease patients completed in China. *Sponsor unblinded. N=10/cohort | Ratio 8:2 (active: placebo) within each cohort; two parallel placebo slots per cohort pooled as N=6. Poster presentation dated June 5, 2026, presented at the
European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (the "2026 EULAR poster"), Method section; SP001 is known as IBI-355 prior to the closing of the in-licensing agreement with the licensor. Phase 1b1 Characterized Safety/Tolerability, PK, and
Efficacy Signals R Treatment Period (Q4W × 4 doses | 12 weeks) Safety Follow-up (12 weeks) Cohort 1:SP001 7.5 mg/kg IV Cohort 2:SP001 15 mg/kg IV Cohort 3:SP001 30 mg/kg IV D1 Dose 1 Wk 4 Dose 2 Wk 8 Dose 3 Wk 12 Last dose Wk 16 Efficacy
endpoints Wk 20 Wk 24 Safety assessment Primary Endpoint: Safety and tolerability of 4 infusions of SP001 Q4W (screening to Week 24) Secondary Endpoint: PK characteristics and immunogenicity (screening to Week 24) Other: Efficacy (ESSDAI, ESSPRI)
Study Design: Double-blind*, placebo-controlled Multiple Ascending Dose (MAD) Study in Sjögren’s disease

Safety Parameter SP001 7.5 mg/kg
(N=8) SP001 15 mg/kg (N=8) SP001 30 mg/kg (N=8) SP001 Total (N=24) Placebo (N=6) Any Adverse Event (%) 75.0 87.5 75.0 79.2 100.0 Upper Respiratory Tract Infection (%) 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 33.3 Hyperlipidemia (%) 37.5 12.5 0.0 16.7 16.7 Serious
Adverse Events None reported Source: 2026 EULAR poster, results section, Safety sub-section, PK sub-section Safety Data Was Generally Benign

Source: 2026 EULAR poster, Efficacy
section Demonstrated Improvements in Disease Activity and B-cell Biomarkers Rheumatoid factor, a classical autoantibody marker EULAR Sjögren's Syndrome Patient Reported Index EULAR Sjögren's Syndrome Disease Activity Index ESSDAI ESSPRI
RF% 7.5 mg/kg N=7 15 mg/kg N=8 30 mg/kg N=8 Placebo N=5 SP001

*Study performed in China 1. 2026
EULAR poster, Efficacy section. SP001 PBO group had 3 patients w/ ESSDAI ≥5; LS mean change from week 0 to week 24 = -0.67 2. Xu et al. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2024;63:698–705 3. St. Clair et al. Nat Med. 2024;30:1583–1592 4. Bowman
et al. Lancet. 2022;399:161–171. The clinical data comparing SP001 and other products and product candidates are based on cross-study comparisons and are not based on any head-to-head clinical trials. Differences exist between trial designs,
patient characteristics and other factors, and caution should be exercised in drawing any conclusions from a comparison of the data across studies as cross-study comparisons are inherently limited and such data may not be directly comparable. Ph1b
Trial of SP001 Demonstrates Favorable Efficacy over Competitor Candidates Placebo-Adjusted Efficacy in Moderate to Severe Patients (ESSDAI ≥5) SP0011 Telitacicept2 Dazodalibep3 Ianalumab4 Primary endpoints at: Week 16 Week 24 Week 24 Week
24

Data to Date Support Continued
Development Low rate of anti-drug antibodies (ADA) SP001 well-tolerated across doses over the course of Phase 1b trial Preclinical toxicology and Phase 1 studies support continued development Chronic preclinical toxicology study currently underway
to support longer duration dosing Safety Immunogenicity Linear PK across all doses Half-life of approximately 28 days 4-week (Q4W) dosing Pharmacokinetics Improvement in ESSDAI and ESSPRI scores vs placebo in all 3 doses Evidence of autoantibody
reduction Efficacy

IgG4-Related Disease

Source: UpToDate; DelveInsight;
Wallace ZS, et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2023;82:957–962 IgG4-Related Disease: Chronic, Immune-Mediated Fibroinflammatory Condition Back Abdominal Cavity Thyroid & Pituitary Gland Chest Cavity Pancreas Lungs Kidneys Liver and Biliary Tract
Heart & Aorta Meninges Eye Sockets Salivary & Tear Glands IgG4-RD can manifest in nearly every organ system Approximately 20K-40K diagnosed US patients Historically underdiagnosed with recently increasing diagnosis rates 60% patients present
with organ damage at diagnosis Age of onset 50-70 years Progression to fibrosis and organ failure with under-treatment

IgG4-RD Diagnosed Source: Syneos
Health analysis. 1. Peyronel et al, Nature 2025. IgG4-related disease and other fibro-inflammatory conditions | Nature Reviews Rheumatology 2. Khosroshahi et al, A&R 20215 International Consensus Guidance Statement on the Management and
Treatment of IgG4‐Related Disease - Khosroshahi - 2015 - Arthritis & Rheumatology - Wiley Online Library 3. Wallace et al, A&R 2019, bltfeda178976f1ad2a.pdf 4. Rare Disease Advisor: IgG4-RD updated Apr 2025 IgG4-Related Disease
Treatment - Rare Disease Advisor. Abbreviations: DMARD- disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. Note: Percentages represent share of patients receiving each therapy as 1L treated (n = 293). Current IgG4-RD Treatment Paradigm Results in Cycles of
Relapse1-4 Biologics Other Non-steroidal, non-biologic DMARD Decision to Treat 57% Steroid Monotherapy 56% Biologics 29% DMARD +/- Steroid DMARD mono: 12% Combo: 3% Adequate Response? NO YES Adequate Response? FDA-approved for IgG4-RD IgG4-RD
guidelines mention Neither of above 1 2 3 Relapse Remission YES NO Rituximab Uplizna Other ✓ ✓ Current therapies manage active flares, but do not provide durable long-term control

Asset Name Company Target Mechanism
of Action Route of Administration Development Status SP001 CD40L T–B cell co-stimulation Intravenous Phase 2 planned Uplizna CD19 B-cell depletion Intravenous Launched Obexelimab CD19+FcgRIIb B-cell inhibition Subcutaneous Phase 3
Rilzabrutinib BTK B-cell inhibition Oral Phase 3 Sources: Citeline and BioMedTracker IgG4-RD Development Landscape Leaves Room for Differentiated Mechanism

1. Borges T, Silva S. IgG4-related
disease: How to place it in the spectrum of immune-mediated and rheumatologic disorders? Mod Rheumatol. 2020 Jul;30(4):609-616.; 2. Kudo-Tanaka E, et al., A case of Mikulicz's disease with Th2-biased cytokine profile: possible feature discriminable
from Sjögren's syndrome. Mod Rheumatol. 2009;19(6):691-5. ; 3. Akiyama M, et al.. Enhanced IgG4 production by follicular helper 2 T cells and the involvement of follicular helper 1 T cells in the pathogenesis of IgG4-related disease. Arthritis
Res Ther. 2016 Jul 13;18:167. Biological Rationale for CD40L Inhibition in IgG4-RD CD40L sustains disease Promotes local T cell : B cell interactions required for B cell accumulation and IgG4 class-switching Activates macrophages (APC) and B cells
that are both potential sources of pro-fibrotic factors (e.g. TNF, IL-6, PDGF, chemokines, etc.) Supporting evidence T cells in IgG4-RD express CD40L1 and CD40 and CD40L are both elevated in IgG4-associated disease2 CD40L is crucial for class
switching of IgG4-RD patient cells in vitro3 SP001 designed to block CD40L driven antigen presentation and cytokines from APC 1 2 SP001 designed to block CD40L driven accumulation of IgG4 B cells / plasmablasts 1 2 IgG4+ plasma cells accumulate
in tissues and are associated with a chronic inflammation, but multiple cells contribute to pathologic fibrotic remodeling

* Patient is flaring despite
steroids Phase 2 Study Designed to Establish Proof of Concept Phase 2 Open Label Treatment (24 weeks) Optional Long-term Extension (to 52 weeks) SP001 Dose 1 N=15 SP001 Dose 2 N=15 R Population: IgG4-RD patients with >1 organ involved over time
and active in at least one organ at enrollment Patients requiring steroids* protocol to incorporate a 4-week or 8-week steroid taper Primary Endpoint: Efficacy: Change from baseline in IgG4-RI at Week 24 Secondary Endpoint Number of patients with
TEAEs following dosing with SP001

Expansion Opportunities

Neurological Problems
concentration, memory loss (brain fog) Dry nose, recurrent sinusitis, nose bleeds Dry mouth, mouth sores dental decay, difficulty chewing, speech, taste Dry eyes, corneal ulceration and infections Difficulty swallowing, heartburn, reflux esophagitis
Recurrent bronchitis pneumonia, interstitial lung disease Dry skin, vasculitis Raynaud’s Phenomenon Abnormal liver function tests, chronic active autoimmune hepatitis preliminary binary cirrhosis Peripheral Neuropathy (Numbness and tingling in
extremities) Arthritis, muscle pain Stomach upset, gastroparesis, autoimmune pancreatitis Vaginal dryness, painful intercourse Sjögren’s Disease Is a Complex Disorder with Limited Treatments Available Chronic autoimmune disease targeting
salivary and lacrimal glands Patients with severe disease (e.g., systemic involvement) progress to life-threatening complications including lymphoma, pulmonary diseases, neuropathy Initially treated with short term steroids Immunosuppressive
therapies (methotrexate, azathioprine, MMF, leflunomide) are used second line based on physician preference Rituximab failed a pivotal trial but is still widely used third line

Epidemiology 1-4 *Potential to
capture additional patients as market evolves with new and improved therapies. Sources: 1.Sjögren’s Foundation website – fast facts accessed 8 June 2026 (affecting as many as 4m Americans); 2. Willey C, Ali S, Alten R. Prevalence of
Physician-Diagnosed versus Clinically Confirmed Primary Sjögren’s syndrome (SS) Among Adults in the United States [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2024; 76 (suppl 9); 3. Datamonitor Healthcare forecast tool accessed February
2026; 4. Helmick et al. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;58:15–25. 5. Brito-Zerón et al. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2016;2:16047. Sjögren’s Disease: US Epidemiology and Unmet Needs Unmet Needs 2nd most common rheumatic autoimmune
disease Up to 4M in the US1 Estimated addressable segment for novel therapies / biologics 5 ~50K-80K addressable patients in US diagnosed US patients2,3,4 250K-400K Approved therapy for Sjögren’s Disease Disease-modifying therapies with
high safety bar enabling chronic treatment Treatment for both systemic disease and patient reported symptoms Clear patient stratification

The Biological Rationale for CD40L
in Sjögren’s Disease Is Well Established 1. Dimitriou et al. Clin Exp Immunol. 2002;127:386–392 2. Nakamura et al. Lab Invest. 1999;79:261–269 3. Goules et al. J Autoimmun. 2006;26:165–171 4. Belkhir et al. Scand J
Immunol. 2014;79:37–42. 5. Wieczorek et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2019;78:974–978 6. Voynova et al. ImmunoHorizons. 2018;2:54–66. 7. St. Clair et al. Nat Med. 2024;30:1583–1592. Pathology is orchestrated by CD40L-expressing T
cells CD40L sustains disease by Stimulating immune activity from both antigen presenting cells and gland cells1 Promoting local production of destructive autoantibodies from B cells Supporting evidence indicates CD40L expression is elevated in
Sjögren's2-4 Inhibition of CD40L blocks local, autoreactive lymphoid structures, and reduces pathology in animal models of Sjögren’s5-6 Importantly, CD40L inhibition has been clinically validated in published Ph2 studies7

Key Investment Highlights: SP001
Sjögren’s disease + applications in cardiology and endocrine disorders Target with human proof-of-concept in several autoimmune diseases Differentiated mechanism compared to other B-cell targeting agents Preclinical data show high potency
compared to key competitors Completed 2 healthy volunteer trials and Phase 1b in Sjögren's disease Expansion opportunities Lead program in IgG4-RD Phase 2 ready antibody Potential best-in-class profile CD40L validated target

Thank You Spero Therapeutics
www.sperotx.com