Telecom Argentina (NYSE: TEO) sees Tucumán court reject consumer damages claim
Rhea-AI Filing Summary
Telecom Argentina S.A. reports that a federal court in Tucumán has ruled not to uphold a consumer action brought by the Asociación de Consumidores del NOA. The claim sought reimbursement to Tucumán users for service not provided during a service outage on March 3, 2015, plus interest, an additional 25% of the amount charged, and punitive damages. The court determined that the outage was a fortuitous event, meaning the company is not liable under this action. This decision removes a legal claim related to past service disruption for Telecom Argentina.
Positive
- None.
Negative
- None.
Insights
A federal court rejected a consumer damages claim against Telecom Argentina.
The decision by the Federal Court No. 1 of Tucumán not to uphold the action from the Asociación de Consumidores del NOA means the court agreed the March 3, 2015 service outage was a fortuitous event. Because the plaintiffs had requested reimbursement of service charges, interest, an additional
For Telecom Argentina, this reduces one source of legal uncertainty tied to a historical network outage, though the filing does not quantify possible exposure. The ruling is case-specific and does not, by itself, address any other consumer or regulatory matters the company may face. Future disclosures in company communications would be needed to understand whether there are related proceedings or follow-on actions.
FAQ
What legal case does Telecom Argentina (TEO) describe in this 6-K?
The company discusses the case titled “Asociación de Consumidores del NOA versus Telecom Argentina S.A. Re. Damages”, docket 6514/2016, relating to a past service outage.
What was the outcome of the Asociación de Consumidores del NOA lawsuit against Telecom Argentina (TEO)?
The Federal Court No. 1 of Tucumán ruled not to uphold the action brought by the Asociación de Consumidores del NOA against Telecom Argentina.
What did the plaintiffs seek from Telecom Argentina (TEO) in this case?
The plaintiffs sought reimbursement to Tucumán users for service not provided during the March 3, 2015 outage, plus interest on overdue payments, an additional 25% of the amount charged, and punitive damages.
On what basis did the court rule in favor of Telecom Argentina (TEO)?
The court determined the March 3, 2015 service outage was a fortuitous event (caso fortuito), meaning Telecom Argentina was not deemed liable in this specific action.
Does this 6-K mention any financial amounts related to the Telecom Argentina (TEO) case?
The report describes the types of amounts requested by the plaintiffs—reimbursements, interest, an extra 25%, and punitive damages—but does not state specific monetary figures.
Who signed the Telecom Argentina (TEO) 6-K regarding the Tucumán court decision?
The notification letter is signed by Andrea V. Cerdán as Attorney-in-Fact, and the report is signed on behalf of the company by Luis Fernando Rial Ubago, Responsible for Market Relations.
