Schedule 13G/A: T. Rowe Price Holds 4.2% of Toro Co Shares
Rhea-AI Filing Summary
T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. filed an Amendment No. 3 to Schedule 13G disclosing beneficial ownership of 4,170,500 shares of Toro Co common stock, representing 4.2% of the class. The filing reports sole voting power over 3,988,287 shares and sole dispositive power over 4,145,484 shares and identifies the security by CUSIP 891092108.
The statement classifies the filer as an investment adviser organized in Maryland and includes a certification that the shares were acquired and are held in the ordinary course of business and not to change or influence control of the issuer. No group affiliations or parent/subsidiary acquisitions are reported.
Positive
- T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. publicly disclosed beneficial ownership of 4,170,500 Toro shares, increasing transparency
- Filing specifies sole voting power for 3,988,287 shares and sole dispositive power for 4,145,484 shares
- Statement includes an explicit certification that holdings were acquired and are held in the ordinary course of business and not to influence control
Negative
- None.
Insights
TL;DR: T. Rowe Price reports a routine 4.2% passive stake in Toro; ownership levels are below 5% and unlikely to alter control.
The Schedule 13G/A shows an institutional investment adviser holding 4,170,500 shares, with sole voting and dispositive authority for most of those shares. Because the filer certified acquisitions were in the ordinary course and the stake is under 5%, this is a standard passive disclosure under Rule 13d-1 rather than an activist signal. The reporting is material for ownership transparency but is not impactful in terms of corporate control.
TL;DR: Ownership and power metrics are documented; certification denies intent to influence control, indicating routine passive investment.
The filing documents both voting and dispositive power figures, which matter for governance monitoring: 3,988,287 votes and 4,145,484 dispositive shares. The explicit certification that holdings were not acquired to influence control, together with the sub-5% position, suggests the disclosure is governance-relevant but not materially disruptive. No group relationships or control claims are indicated.