Schedule 13G/A: GEM and Lynch Report 4.9% Stake in TXO
Rhea-AI Filing Summary
Global Endowment Management, LP (GEM) and Stephanie S. Lynch report beneficial ownership of 2,686,017 common units of TXO Partners, L.P., representing approximately 4.9% of the outstanding common units as of June 30, 2025. The filing states the calculation uses about 54,784,292 common units outstanding based on the issuer's May 2025 public offering and the underwriters' option exercise.
The reporting persons hold no sole voting or dispositive power and report shared voting and shared dispositive power over the 2,686,017 units. The units are held for accounts of GEF-DTOE, Inc. and GEF-PUE, LP; GEM controls those investment decisions and Ms. Lynch controls GEM.
Positive
- None.
Negative
- None.
Insights
TL;DR: Reporting persons disclose a non-controlling ~4.9% stake in TXO, shared voting and dispositive power only.
The Schedule 13G/A shows GEM and Stephanie Lynch may be deemed beneficial owners of 2,686,017 common units, equal to ~4.9% of TXO based on 54.78 million units outstanding. The stake is below the 5% threshold used for certain heightened disclosures, so this is a passive disclosure rather than an active control signal. Shared voting and dispositive power indicates influence is exercised collectively through accounts GEM manages rather than individual sole control. For investors, this represents a meaningful institutional holder but not a controlling or activist position based on the filing alone.
TL;DR: Ownership is disclosed as shared, not sole, implying governance influence is limited and consistent with passive investor status.
The filing clarifies that the reported units are held for specific managed accounts and that GEM and Ms. Lynch have management/control relationships that create beneficial ownership attribution. However, the absence of sole voting or dispositive power and the sub-5% position suggest limited unilateral governance impact. The statement that certain GEM-managed funds have rights to dividends or sale proceeds is routine and does not by itself indicate a policy or board-change intention.