Form 4: Elliott Confirms 10%+ Position in Uniti Group Post-Merger
Rhea-AI Filing Summary
Form 4 snapshot: Elliott Investment Management L.P., classified as a 10% owner of Uniti Group (UNIT), reported a Rule J transaction on 08/01/2025. The filing records the receipt of 6,101,928 new UNIT common shares, lifting Elliott-managed funds’ indirect stake to 59,012,219 shares.
The shares were issued under the May 3 2024 Uniti–Windstream merger agreement (amended July 17 2024) in exchange for 10,120,963 “Old Uniti” shares, indicating a restructuring-driven share issuance rather than open-market buying. No derivative positions were reported and no transaction price was disclosed.
Elliott retains its >10 % holding, signalling continued economic exposure and potential influence after the merger-related recapitalisation. No immediate cash inflow or dilution details were provided for other investors.
Positive
- Elliott retains a sizeable 59 m-share (~10%+) position, indicating ongoing commitment and potential alignment with minority shareholders.
Negative
- None.
Insights
TL;DR: Elliott swapped Old Uniti shares for 6.1 m new UNIT shares, keeping a 59 m-share stake; impact neutral, confirms >10 % ownership.
Code J indicates a non-market acquisition tied to the Windstream merger. Because Elliott already controlled the exchanged stock, the transaction does not inject fresh capital or change total economic exposure. The post-deal figure—about 59 m shares—confirms Elliott remains a significant holder, which can be viewed as a vote of confidence but does not, by itself, alter valuation. Market impact should be limited unless Elliott uses its position to push strategic change.
TL;DR: Filing formalises Elliott’s stake post-merger; governance influence intact, no new control shift.
The disclosure fulfils Section 16 obligations following UNIT’s share reclassification. Elliott’s indirect ownership structure—through multiple funds—remains unchanged, and the firm expressly disclaims beneficial ownership beyond pecuniary interest, limiting potential legal exposure. From a governance standpoint, Elliott’s capacity to agitate or seek board representation persists, but the Form 4 itself signals no new activism.