Vivmark ex-officer plans $65K sale of 1,003 shares
VIVMARK RESIDENTIAL (VMRK) has a notice of proposed sale of common stock by former officer Catherine M. Carraway under Rule 144.
Rhea-AI Filing Summary
VIVMARK RESIDENTIAL (VMRK) has a notice of proposed sale of common stock by former officer Catherine M. Carraway under Rule 144. The notice covers 1,003 shares of common stock, related to restricted stock vesting on August 31, 2026, with part of the sale intended to cover associated tax obligations.
Positive
- None.
Negative
- None.
Key Figures
Shares to be sold: 1,003 shares of common stock
Aggregate market value: $65,471.23
Shares sold in past 3 months: 2,873 shares
+3 more
6 metrics
Shares to be sold
1,003 shares of common stock
Securities information for proposed Rule 144 sale
Aggregate market value
$65,471.23
Value reported for 1,003 shares as of September 1, 2026
Shares sold in past 3 months
2,873 shares
Common stock sale on August 26, 2026 by Catherine M. Carraway
Proceeds from recent sale
$193,995.30
Total for 2,873 shares sold on August 26, 2026
Vesting date
August 31, 2026
Restricted stock vesting related to 1,003 shares
Notice date
September 1, 2026
Date of the Rule 144 notice
Key Terms
Rule 144, restricted stock vesting, attorney-in-fact, compensation
4 terms
Rule 144 regulatory
"See the definition of "person" in paragraph (a) of Rule 144."
Rule 144 is a U.S. securities regulation that sets conditions under which restricted or insider-held shares can be legally resold to the public, such as required holding periods, availability of public information, limits on how much can be sold at once, and certain filing requirements. For investors it matters because it determines when previously locked-up shares can enter the market — like a release valve that can increase supply, affect share price, and signal insider intent.
restricted stock vesting financial
"Common | 08/31/2026 | Restricted Stock Vesting | Issuer"
Restricted stock vesting is the timetable and conditions under which shares granted to employees or insiders become fully owned and can be sold, typically requiring continued work or meeting performance goals. It matters to investors because large blocks of shares can become tradable at once, which can change share supply and price, and because vesting aligns insiders’ incentives with the company’s long‑term performance—think of it like a timed unlock that both rewards and locks in key people.
attorney-in-fact regulatory
"as attorney-in-fact for Catherine M. Carraway"
An attorney-in-fact is the person or entity given legal authority through a power of attorney to act on behalf of another for specific tasks, such as signing documents, voting shares, or handling transactions. For investors, this matters because it lets a trusted representative make timely decisions or complete paperwork when the owner cannot, much like handing keys to someone to run errands on your behalf—so checks on scope and limits of that authority are important.
compensation financial
"1003 | 08/31/2026 | Compensation"
FAQ
Why does the VMRK Rule 144 notice mention tax obligations?
The remarks state that the sale includes an amount necessary to cover a tax obligation resulting from the settlement of a vested equity award distribution, indicating part of the transaction is intended to satisfy related tax liabilities.
AI-generated analysis. How Rhea-AI works. Not financial advice.