[144] Vertiv Holdings Co SEC Filing
Vertiv Holdings Co (VRT) filed a Form 144 notifying a proposed sale of 100,000 shares of common stock through J.P. Morgan Securities LLC on the NYSE, with an approximate sale date of 08/26/2025. The filing lists an aggregate market value of $12,822,110 and shows 381,866,664 shares outstanding for the issuer.
The filing discloses that the shares were acquired in two open-market purchases—66,667 shares on 02/07/2020 and 33,333 shares on 01/13/2021—and that payment was made in cash. The filer reports no securities sold in the past three months and includes the standard representation that the selling person is not aware of undisclosed material adverse information.
- Transaction disclosed publicly in compliance with Rule 144, providing transparency
- Brokered through J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, suggesting professional execution
- Shares acquired with cash in open-market purchases, indicating routine provenance
- No securities sold in prior three months, implying this is not part of a recent disposal pattern
- None.
Insights
TL;DR: Routine insider sale notice for 100,000 VRT shares via a major broker; amount is small relative to outstanding shares.
The Form 144 is a standard notification of intent to sell restricted or control securities in compliance with Rule 144. The 100,000-share block represents approximately 0.026% of the issuer's reported 381,866,664 shares outstanding, indicating limited potential market impact. The use of a large brokerage firm and cash payment at acquisition are typical and support orderly execution. There are no disclosed recent sales in the prior three months, which may indicate this is a discrete transaction rather than a continuing disposition.
TL;DR: Filing appears procedurally complete for Rule 144 purposes but lacks identifying filer details in the provided extract.
The notice includes required transaction details—class, broker, share counts, acquisition dates, and payment method—and the standard attestation regarding material nonpublic information. However, the provided content omits explicit filer identification fields (CIK, filer name) in the extract; if absent in the actual filing, that would be a procedural deficiency. Based on the disclosed figures alone, there are no red flags for Rule 144 compliance beyond the missing metadata in this excerpt.