STOCK TITAN

[424B2] Inverse VIX Short-Term Futures ETNs due March 22, 2045 Prospectus Supplement

Filing Impact
(Low)
Filing Sentiment
(Neutral)
Form Type
424B2
Rhea-AI Filing Summary

GSK plc has completed the acquisition of BP Asset IX, Inc. from Boston Pharmaceuticals, gaining full rights to efimosfermin alfa, a Phase III–ready, once-monthly FGF21 analogue being developed for metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) and alcohol-related liver disease (ALD). These two diseases are the leading causes of liver transplantation in the US and currently have limited treatment options.

The deal, disclosed via Form 6-K, is valued at up to US$2 billion, consisting of an upfront cash payment of US$1.2 billion and up to US$800 million in success-based milestones. In addition, GSK will assume tiered royalty obligations owed to Novartis. Management identifies efimosfermin as a "key growth opportunity" with a potential first commercial launch in 2029, and sees synergy with GSK'990, its in-house siRNA therapy for other steatotic liver disease (SLD) subsets.

Efimosfermin’s proposed antifibrotic mechanism is aimed at halting or reversing liver fibrosis in moderate to advanced MASH, including cirrhosis, and it may be positioned for combination therapy within GSK’s expanding hepatology franchise. The transaction reinforces GSK’s strategic emphasis on immune-mediated and fibro-inflammatory diseases across liver, lung and kidney.

No immediate earnings guidance changes were provided, but the large upfront payment will impact near-term cash outflows while clinical, regulatory and commercial risks remain until at least late-decade approval. Forward-looking statements are subject to the risk factors detailed in GSK’s 2024 Form 20-F and 2025 Q1 results.

GSK plc ha completato l'acquisizione di BP Asset IX, Inc. da Boston Pharmaceuticals, ottenendo i diritti completi su efimosfermin alfa, un analogo FGF21 pronto per la Fase III, somministrabile una volta al mese, sviluppato per la steatoepatite associata a disfunzione metabolica (MASH) e la malattia epatica correlata all'alcol (ALD). Queste due patologie sono le principali cause di trapianto di fegato negli Stati Uniti e attualmente dispongono di opzioni terapeutiche limitate.

L'accordo, reso noto tramite il Modulo 6-K, ha un valore di fino a 2 miliardi di dollari USA, comprendendo un pagamento iniziale in contanti di 1,2 miliardi di dollari USA e fino a 800 milioni di dollari USA legati al raggiungimento di determinati obiettivi di successo. Inoltre, GSK assumerà obblighi di royalty a scaglioni dovuti a Novartis. La direzione identifica efimosfermin come una "opportunità chiave di crescita" con un potenziale lancio commerciale previsto per il 2029, e vede sinergie con GSK'990, la sua terapia siRNA interna per altri sottotipi di malattie epatiche steatotiche (SLD).

Il meccanismo antifibrotico proposto di efimosfermin mira a fermare o invertire la fibrosi epatica in MASH da moderata ad avanzata, inclusa la cirrosi, e potrebbe essere utilizzato in terapia combinata all'interno della crescente divisione di epatologia di GSK. La transazione rafforza l'enfasi strategica di GSK sulle malattie immuno-mediate e fibro-infiammatorie che coinvolgono fegato, polmoni e reni.

Non sono state fornite indicazioni immediate sugli utili, ma il consistente pagamento iniziale influenzerà i flussi di cassa a breve termine, mentre permangono rischi clinici, regolatori e commerciali almeno fino all'approvazione prevista verso la fine del decennio. Le dichiarazioni previsionali sono soggette ai fattori di rischio dettagliati nel Modulo 20-F 2024 di GSK e nei risultati del primo trimestre 2025.

GSK plc ha completado la adquisición de BP Asset IX, Inc. de Boston Pharmaceuticals, obteniendo los derechos completos sobre efimosfermin alfa, un análogo de FGF21 listo para Fase III, administrado una vez al mes, que se desarrolla para la esteatohepatitis asociada a disfunción metabólica (MASH) y la enfermedad hepática relacionada con el alcohol (ALD). Estas dos enfermedades son las principales causas de trasplante de hígado en EE.UU. y actualmente tienen opciones de tratamiento limitadas.

El acuerdo, divulgado a través del Formulario 6-K, está valorado en hasta 2 mil millones de dólares estadounidenses, que consiste en un pago inicial en efectivo de 1.2 mil millones de dólares y hasta 800 millones de dólares en hitos basados en el éxito. Además, GSK asumirá obligaciones de regalías escalonadas adeudadas a Novartis. La dirección identifica a efimosfermin como una "oportunidad clave de crecimiento" con un posible lanzamiento comercial en 2029, y ve sinergias con GSK'990, su terapia siRNA interna para otros subtipos de enfermedades hepáticas esteatósicas (SLD).

El mecanismo antifibrótico propuesto de efimosfermin apunta a detener o revertir la fibrosis hepática en MASH de moderada a avanzada, incluida la cirrosis, y podría posicionarse para terapia combinada dentro de la creciente franquicia de hepatología de GSK. La transacción refuerza el énfasis estratégico de GSK en enfermedades inmunomediadas y fibroinflamatorias que afectan el hígado, pulmones y riñones.

No se proporcionaron cambios inmediatos en las previsiones de ganancias, pero el gran pago inicial impactará los flujos de caja a corto plazo, mientras que los riesgos clínicos, regulatorios y comerciales permanecen al menos hasta la aprobación prevista para finales de la década. Las declaraciones prospectivas están sujetas a los factores de riesgo detallados en el Formulario 20-F de GSK 2024 y en los resultados del primer trimestre de 2025.

GSK plc가 Boston Pharmaceuticals로부터 BP Asset IX, Inc.를 인수 완료하며 대사 기능 장애 관련 지방간염(MASH) 및 알코올 관련 간질환(ALD) 치료를 위해 개발 중인, 3상 준비 완료된 월 1회 투여 FGF21 유사체인 에피모스퍼민 알파에 대한 전면 권리를 확보했습니다. 이 두 질환은 미국에서 간 이식의 주요 원인이며 현재 치료 옵션이 제한적입니다.

6-K 양식을 통해 공개된 이번 거래는 최대 20억 달러 규모로, 선불 현금 지급액 12억 달러와 성공 기반 마일스톤 최대 8억 달러로 구성되어 있습니다. 또한 GSK는 Novartis에 지불해야 하는 단계별 로열티 의무도 인수합니다. 경영진은 에피모스퍼민을 "핵심 성장 기회"로 보고 있으며, 2029년 첫 상업 출시를 목표로 하고, GSK의 자체 siRNA 치료제 GSK'990과의 시너지도 기대하고 있습니다.

에피모스퍼민의 제안된 항섬유화 기전은 중등도에서 진행된 MASH 및 간경변을 포함한 간 섬유증을 멈추거나 역전시키는 것을 목표로 하며, GSK의 확대 중인 간질환 분야 내 병용 요법으로 활용될 수 있습니다. 이번 거래는 간, 폐, 신장에 걸친 면역 매개 및 섬유염증 질환에 대한 GSK의 전략적 집중을 강화합니다.

즉각적인 수익 전망 변경은 없었으나, 대규모 선불 지급이 단기 현금 유출에 영향을 미칠 것이며, 임상, 규제 및 상업적 위험이 적어도 10년대 후반 승인 시점까지 지속될 것입니다. 미래 예측 진술은 GSK의 2024년 Form 20-F 및 2025년 1분기 실적에 명시된 위험 요소에 따릅니다.

GSK plc a finalisé l'acquisition de BP Asset IX, Inc. auprès de Boston Pharmaceuticals, obtenant ainsi les droits exclusifs sur l’efimosfermin alfa, un analogue FGF21 prêt pour la Phase III, administré une fois par mois, développé pour la stéatohépatite associée à une dysfonction métabolique (MASH) et la maladie hépatique liée à l’alcool (ALD). Ces deux maladies sont les principales causes de transplantation hépatique aux États-Unis et disposent actuellement de peu d’options thérapeutiques.

L’accord, révélé via le formulaire 6-K, est évalué à jusqu’à 2 milliards de dollars US, comprenant un paiement initial en espèces de 1,2 milliard de dollars US et jusqu’à 800 millions de dollars US en jalons liés au succès. De plus, GSK assumera des obligations de redevances échelonnées dues à Novartis. La direction considère l’efimosfermin comme une « opportunité clé de croissance » avec un lancement commercial potentiel en 2029, et perçoit une synergie avec GSK'990, sa thérapie siRNA interne pour d’autres sous-types de maladies hépatiques stéatosiques (SLD).

Le mécanisme antifibrotique proposé de l’efimosfermin vise à arrêter ou inverser la fibrose hépatique dans les cas de MASH modérée à avancée, y compris la cirrhose, et pourrait être positionné en thérapie combinée au sein de la franchise hépatologie en expansion de GSK. Cette transaction renforce l’accent stratégique de GSK sur les maladies immuno-médiées et fibro-inflammatoires touchant le foie, les poumons et les reins.

Aucun changement immédiat des prévisions de résultats n’a été communiqué, mais le paiement initial important impactera les sorties de trésorerie à court terme, tandis que les risques cliniques, réglementaires et commerciaux subsistent au moins jusqu’à l’approbation prévue vers la fin de la décennie. Les déclarations prospectives sont soumises aux facteurs de risque détaillés dans le formulaire 20-F 2024 de GSK et les résultats du premier trimestre 2025.

GSK plc hat die Übernahme von BP Asset IX, Inc. von Boston Pharmaceuticals abgeschlossen und damit die vollständigen Rechte an Efimosfermin alfa erworben, einem für Phase III bereiten, einmal monatlich verabreichten FGF21-Analogon, das für metabolisch bedingte Steatohepatitis (MASH) und alkoholbedingte Lebererkrankungen (ALD) entwickelt wird. Diese beiden Krankheiten sind die Hauptursachen für Lebertransplantationen in den USA und haben derzeit nur begrenzte Behandlungsmöglichkeiten.

Der Deal, der über das Formular 6-K offengelegt wurde, hat einen Wert von bis zu 2 Milliarden US-Dollar und besteht aus einer Vorauszahlung in Höhe von 1,2 Milliarden US-Dollar sowie bis zu 800 Millionen US-Dollar an erfolgsabhängigen Meilensteinen. Darüber hinaus übernimmt GSK gestaffelte Lizenzgebührenverpflichtungen gegenüber Novartis. Das Management sieht Efimosfermin als eine "wichtige Wachstumschance" mit einem möglichen ersten kommerziellen Start im Jahr 2029 und erkennt Synergien mit GSK'990, der firmeneigenen siRNA-Therapie für andere Subtypen der steatotischen Lebererkrankung (SLD).

Der vorgeschlagene antifibrotische Wirkmechanismus von Efimosfermin zielt darauf ab, die Leberfibrose bei mittelschwerer bis fortgeschrittener MASH, einschließlich Zirrhose, zu stoppen oder umzukehren, und könnte als Kombinationstherapie innerhalb der wachsenden Hepatologie-Sparte von GSK positioniert werden. Die Transaktion unterstreicht GSKs strategischen Fokus auf immunvermittelte und fibroinflammatorische Erkrankungen der Leber, Lunge und Niere.

Es wurden keine unmittelbaren Gewinnprognoseänderungen bekanntgegeben, aber die hohe Vorauszahlung wird kurzfristig die Cashflows belasten, während klinische, regulatorische und kommerzielle Risiken mindestens bis zur voraussichtlichen Zulassung gegen Ende des Jahrzehnts bestehen bleiben. Zukunftsgerichtete Aussagen unterliegen den im GSK 2024 Form 20-F und den Ergebnissen des ersten Quartals 2025 aufgeführten Risikofaktoren.

Positive
  • Late-stage pipeline boost: Acquisition adds a Phase III–ready asset addressing large unmet SLD market.
  • Differentiated modality: Once-monthly FGF21 analogue may offer dosing and efficacy advantages over competitors.
  • Strategic fit: Strengthens GSK’s hepatology and fibro-inflammatory disease franchise, providing synergy with in-house siRNA program.
Negative
  • Significant cash outflow: US$1.2 billion upfront payment will pressure short-term free cash flow.
  • Execution risk: Approval not expected until 2029, leaving multiple clinical and regulatory hurdles.
  • Royalty and milestone obligations: Additional payments to Novartis could compress future margins.

Insights

TL;DR – Strategic pipeline expansion; modest near-term dilution, high long-term optionality.

The US$2 billion structure appears reasonable for a Phase III–ready asset addressing a multi-billion-dollar unmet need. GSK strengthens its hepatology presence and diversifies beyond vaccines and HIV. The once-monthly profile could differentiate efimosfermin against daily or weekly competitors. However, the earliest launch target of 2029 means five years of clinical, regulatory and reimbursement risk, and the sizable US$1.2 billion upfront will depress 2025 free cash flow. Overall, the transaction is strategically positive with neutral-to-slightly negative short-term financial impact.

TL;DR – High execution risk offsets strategic merit; impact largely neutral today.

While efimosfermin expands GSK’s late-stage pipeline, investors will discount the asset until Phase III data materialise. Competitive landscape includes Akero’s efruxifermin and Madrigal’s resmetirom. The cash payout heightens liquidity risk amid existing R&D commitments and upcoming patent expiries. From a portfolio standpoint, risk/reward skews positive over the long term but does not materially alter near-term valuation. I deem the disclosure not impactful to current trading yet worth monitoring.

GSK plc ha completato l'acquisizione di BP Asset IX, Inc. da Boston Pharmaceuticals, ottenendo i diritti completi su efimosfermin alfa, un analogo FGF21 pronto per la Fase III, somministrabile una volta al mese, sviluppato per la steatoepatite associata a disfunzione metabolica (MASH) e la malattia epatica correlata all'alcol (ALD). Queste due patologie sono le principali cause di trapianto di fegato negli Stati Uniti e attualmente dispongono di opzioni terapeutiche limitate.

L'accordo, reso noto tramite il Modulo 6-K, ha un valore di fino a 2 miliardi di dollari USA, comprendendo un pagamento iniziale in contanti di 1,2 miliardi di dollari USA e fino a 800 milioni di dollari USA legati al raggiungimento di determinati obiettivi di successo. Inoltre, GSK assumerà obblighi di royalty a scaglioni dovuti a Novartis. La direzione identifica efimosfermin come una "opportunità chiave di crescita" con un potenziale lancio commerciale previsto per il 2029, e vede sinergie con GSK'990, la sua terapia siRNA interna per altri sottotipi di malattie epatiche steatotiche (SLD).

Il meccanismo antifibrotico proposto di efimosfermin mira a fermare o invertire la fibrosi epatica in MASH da moderata ad avanzata, inclusa la cirrosi, e potrebbe essere utilizzato in terapia combinata all'interno della crescente divisione di epatologia di GSK. La transazione rafforza l'enfasi strategica di GSK sulle malattie immuno-mediate e fibro-infiammatorie che coinvolgono fegato, polmoni e reni.

Non sono state fornite indicazioni immediate sugli utili, ma il consistente pagamento iniziale influenzerà i flussi di cassa a breve termine, mentre permangono rischi clinici, regolatori e commerciali almeno fino all'approvazione prevista verso la fine del decennio. Le dichiarazioni previsionali sono soggette ai fattori di rischio dettagliati nel Modulo 20-F 2024 di GSK e nei risultati del primo trimestre 2025.

GSK plc ha completado la adquisición de BP Asset IX, Inc. de Boston Pharmaceuticals, obteniendo los derechos completos sobre efimosfermin alfa, un análogo de FGF21 listo para Fase III, administrado una vez al mes, que se desarrolla para la esteatohepatitis asociada a disfunción metabólica (MASH) y la enfermedad hepática relacionada con el alcohol (ALD). Estas dos enfermedades son las principales causas de trasplante de hígado en EE.UU. y actualmente tienen opciones de tratamiento limitadas.

El acuerdo, divulgado a través del Formulario 6-K, está valorado en hasta 2 mil millones de dólares estadounidenses, que consiste en un pago inicial en efectivo de 1.2 mil millones de dólares y hasta 800 millones de dólares en hitos basados en el éxito. Además, GSK asumirá obligaciones de regalías escalonadas adeudadas a Novartis. La dirección identifica a efimosfermin como una "oportunidad clave de crecimiento" con un posible lanzamiento comercial en 2029, y ve sinergias con GSK'990, su terapia siRNA interna para otros subtipos de enfermedades hepáticas esteatósicas (SLD).

El mecanismo antifibrótico propuesto de efimosfermin apunta a detener o revertir la fibrosis hepática en MASH de moderada a avanzada, incluida la cirrosis, y podría posicionarse para terapia combinada dentro de la creciente franquicia de hepatología de GSK. La transacción refuerza el énfasis estratégico de GSK en enfermedades inmunomediadas y fibroinflamatorias que afectan el hígado, pulmones y riñones.

No se proporcionaron cambios inmediatos en las previsiones de ganancias, pero el gran pago inicial impactará los flujos de caja a corto plazo, mientras que los riesgos clínicos, regulatorios y comerciales permanecen al menos hasta la aprobación prevista para finales de la década. Las declaraciones prospectivas están sujetas a los factores de riesgo detallados en el Formulario 20-F de GSK 2024 y en los resultados del primer trimestre de 2025.

GSK plc가 Boston Pharmaceuticals로부터 BP Asset IX, Inc.를 인수 완료하며 대사 기능 장애 관련 지방간염(MASH) 및 알코올 관련 간질환(ALD) 치료를 위해 개발 중인, 3상 준비 완료된 월 1회 투여 FGF21 유사체인 에피모스퍼민 알파에 대한 전면 권리를 확보했습니다. 이 두 질환은 미국에서 간 이식의 주요 원인이며 현재 치료 옵션이 제한적입니다.

6-K 양식을 통해 공개된 이번 거래는 최대 20억 달러 규모로, 선불 현금 지급액 12억 달러와 성공 기반 마일스톤 최대 8억 달러로 구성되어 있습니다. 또한 GSK는 Novartis에 지불해야 하는 단계별 로열티 의무도 인수합니다. 경영진은 에피모스퍼민을 "핵심 성장 기회"로 보고 있으며, 2029년 첫 상업 출시를 목표로 하고, GSK의 자체 siRNA 치료제 GSK'990과의 시너지도 기대하고 있습니다.

에피모스퍼민의 제안된 항섬유화 기전은 중등도에서 진행된 MASH 및 간경변을 포함한 간 섬유증을 멈추거나 역전시키는 것을 목표로 하며, GSK의 확대 중인 간질환 분야 내 병용 요법으로 활용될 수 있습니다. 이번 거래는 간, 폐, 신장에 걸친 면역 매개 및 섬유염증 질환에 대한 GSK의 전략적 집중을 강화합니다.

즉각적인 수익 전망 변경은 없었으나, 대규모 선불 지급이 단기 현금 유출에 영향을 미칠 것이며, 임상, 규제 및 상업적 위험이 적어도 10년대 후반 승인 시점까지 지속될 것입니다. 미래 예측 진술은 GSK의 2024년 Form 20-F 및 2025년 1분기 실적에 명시된 위험 요소에 따릅니다.

GSK plc a finalisé l'acquisition de BP Asset IX, Inc. auprès de Boston Pharmaceuticals, obtenant ainsi les droits exclusifs sur l’efimosfermin alfa, un analogue FGF21 prêt pour la Phase III, administré une fois par mois, développé pour la stéatohépatite associée à une dysfonction métabolique (MASH) et la maladie hépatique liée à l’alcool (ALD). Ces deux maladies sont les principales causes de transplantation hépatique aux États-Unis et disposent actuellement de peu d’options thérapeutiques.

L’accord, révélé via le formulaire 6-K, est évalué à jusqu’à 2 milliards de dollars US, comprenant un paiement initial en espèces de 1,2 milliard de dollars US et jusqu’à 800 millions de dollars US en jalons liés au succès. De plus, GSK assumera des obligations de redevances échelonnées dues à Novartis. La direction considère l’efimosfermin comme une « opportunité clé de croissance » avec un lancement commercial potentiel en 2029, et perçoit une synergie avec GSK'990, sa thérapie siRNA interne pour d’autres sous-types de maladies hépatiques stéatosiques (SLD).

Le mécanisme antifibrotique proposé de l’efimosfermin vise à arrêter ou inverser la fibrose hépatique dans les cas de MASH modérée à avancée, y compris la cirrhose, et pourrait être positionné en thérapie combinée au sein de la franchise hépatologie en expansion de GSK. Cette transaction renforce l’accent stratégique de GSK sur les maladies immuno-médiées et fibro-inflammatoires touchant le foie, les poumons et les reins.

Aucun changement immédiat des prévisions de résultats n’a été communiqué, mais le paiement initial important impactera les sorties de trésorerie à court terme, tandis que les risques cliniques, réglementaires et commerciaux subsistent au moins jusqu’à l’approbation prévue vers la fin de la décennie. Les déclarations prospectives sont soumises aux facteurs de risque détaillés dans le formulaire 20-F 2024 de GSK et les résultats du premier trimestre 2025.

GSK plc hat die Übernahme von BP Asset IX, Inc. von Boston Pharmaceuticals abgeschlossen und damit die vollständigen Rechte an Efimosfermin alfa erworben, einem für Phase III bereiten, einmal monatlich verabreichten FGF21-Analogon, das für metabolisch bedingte Steatohepatitis (MASH) und alkoholbedingte Lebererkrankungen (ALD) entwickelt wird. Diese beiden Krankheiten sind die Hauptursachen für Lebertransplantationen in den USA und haben derzeit nur begrenzte Behandlungsmöglichkeiten.

Der Deal, der über das Formular 6-K offengelegt wurde, hat einen Wert von bis zu 2 Milliarden US-Dollar und besteht aus einer Vorauszahlung in Höhe von 1,2 Milliarden US-Dollar sowie bis zu 800 Millionen US-Dollar an erfolgsabhängigen Meilensteinen. Darüber hinaus übernimmt GSK gestaffelte Lizenzgebührenverpflichtungen gegenüber Novartis. Das Management sieht Efimosfermin als eine "wichtige Wachstumschance" mit einem möglichen ersten kommerziellen Start im Jahr 2029 und erkennt Synergien mit GSK'990, der firmeneigenen siRNA-Therapie für andere Subtypen der steatotischen Lebererkrankung (SLD).

Der vorgeschlagene antifibrotische Wirkmechanismus von Efimosfermin zielt darauf ab, die Leberfibrose bei mittelschwerer bis fortgeschrittener MASH, einschließlich Zirrhose, zu stoppen oder umzukehren, und könnte als Kombinationstherapie innerhalb der wachsenden Hepatologie-Sparte von GSK positioniert werden. Die Transaktion unterstreicht GSKs strategischen Fokus auf immunvermittelte und fibroinflammatorische Erkrankungen der Leber, Lunge und Niere.

Es wurden keine unmittelbaren Gewinnprognoseänderungen bekanntgegeben, aber die hohe Vorauszahlung wird kurzfristig die Cashflows belasten, während klinische, regulatorische und kommerzielle Risiken mindestens bis zur voraussichtlichen Zulassung gegen Ende des Jahrzehnts bestehen bleiben. Zukunftsgerichtete Aussagen unterliegen den im GSK 2024 Form 20-F und den Ergebnissen des ersten Quartals 2025 aufgeführten Risikofaktoren.

 

Pricing supplement
To prospectus dated April 13, 2023,

prospectus supplement dated April 13, 2023,

product supplement no. 2-I dated April 13, 2023

and prospectus addendum dated June 3, 2024

Registration Statement Nos. 333-270004 and 333-270004-01
Dated July 2, 2025

Rule 424(b)(2)

 

JPMorgan Chase Financial Company LLC

Structured Investments

$3,710,000

Digital Buffered Notes Linked to a WTI Crude Oil Futures Contract due July 21, 2026

Fully and Unconditionally Guaranteed by JPMorgan Chase & Co.

General

The notes are designed for investors who seek a fixed return of 11.90% if the Ending Contract Price of the Commodity Futures Contract is greater than or equal to the Contract Strike Price or is less than the Contract Strike Price by up to 23.00%.

Investors should be willing to forgo interest payments and be willing to lose some or all of their principal if the Ending Contract Price is less than the Contract Strike Price by more than 23.00%.

The notes are unsecured and unsubordinated obligations of JPMorgan Chase Financial Company LLC, which we refer to as JPMorgan Financial, the payment on which is fully and unconditionally guaranteed by JPMorgan Chase & Co. Any payment on the notes is subject to the credit risk of JPMorgan Financial, as issuer of the notes, and the credit risk of JPMorgan Chase & Co., as guarantor of the notes.

Minimum denominations of $10,000 and integral multiples of $1,000 in excess thereof

Key Terms

Issuer:

JPMorgan Chase Financial Company LLC, a direct, wholly owned finance subsidiary of JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Guarantor:

JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Commodity Futures Contract:

The first nearby month futures contract for WTI crude oil (Bloomberg ticker: CL1) traded on the New York Mercantile Exchange (the “NYMEX”) or, on any day that falls on the last trading day of such contract (all pursuant to the rules of the NYMEX), the second nearby month futures contract for WTI crude oil (Bloomberg ticker: CL2) traded on the NYMEX

Payment at Maturity:

If the Ending Contract Price is greater than or equal to the Contract Strike Price or is less than the Contract Strike Price by up to the Buffer Percentage, at maturity you will receive a cash payment that provides you with a return per $1,000 principal amount note equal to the Contingent Digital Return. Accordingly, under these circumstances, your payment at maturity per $1,000 principal amount note will be calculated as follows:

$1,000 + ($1,000 × Contingent Digital Return)

If the Ending Contract Price is less than the Contract Strike Price by more than the Buffer Percentage, at maturity you will lose 1.29870% of the principal amount of your notes for every 1% that the Ending Contract Price is less than the Contract Strike Price by more than the Buffer Percentage. Under these circumstances, your payment at maturity per $1,000 principal amount note will be calculated as follows:

 

$1,000 + [$1,000 × (Contract Return + Buffer Percentage) × Downside Leverage Factor]

In no event, however, will the payment at maturity be less than $0.

 

If the Ending Contract Price is less than the Contract Strike Price by more than the Buffer Percentage, you will lose some or all of your principal amount at maturity.

Contingent Digital Return:

11.90%, which reflects the maximum return on the notes. Accordingly, the maximum payment at maturity per $1,000 principal amount note is $1,119.00.

Buffer Percentage:

23.00%

Downside Leverage Factor:

1.29870

Contract Return:

Ending Contract PriceContract Strike Price

Contract Strike Price

Contract Strike Price:

The Contract Price on the Strike Date, which was $65.45. The Contract Strike Price is not determined by reference to the Contract Price on the Pricing Date.

Ending Contract Price:

The Contract Price on the Observation Date

Contract Price:

On any day, the official settlement price per barrel on the NYMEX of the first nearby month futures contract for WTI crude oil, stated in U.S. dollars, provided that if that day falls on the last trading day of such futures contract (all pursuant to the rules of the NYMEX), then the second nearby month futures contract for WTI crude oil, as made public by the NYMEX and displayed on the Bloomberg Professional® service (“Bloomberg”) under the symbol “CL1” or “CL2,” as applicable, on that day

Strike Date:

July 1, 2025

Pricing Date:

July 2, 2025

Original Issue Date:

On or about July 8, 2025 (Settlement Date)

Observation Date:

July 16, 2026

Maturity Date:

July 21, 2026

CUSIP:

48135NXM3

 Subject to postponement in the event of a market disruption event and as described under “General Terms of Notes — Postponement of a Determination Date — Notes Linked to a Single Underlying — Notes Linked to a Single Commodity or Commodity Futures Contract” and “General Terms of Notes — Postponement of a Payment Date” in the accompanying product supplement or early acceleration in the event of a commodity hedging disruption event as described under “General Terms of Notes — Consequences of a Commodity Hedging Disruption Event — Acceleration of the Notes” in the accompanying product supplement and in “Selected Risk Considerations — Risks Relating to the Notes Generally — We May Accelerate Your Notes If a Commodity Hedging Disruption Event Occurs” in this pricing supplement

Investing in the notes involves a number of risks. See “Risk Factors” beginning on page S-2 of the accompanying prospectus supplement, Annex A to the accompanying prospectus addendum, “Risk Factors” beginning on page PS-11 of the accompanying product supplement and “Selected Risk Considerations” beginning on page PS-5 of this pricing supplement.

Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved of the notes or passed upon the accuracy or the adequacy of this pricing supplement or the accompanying product supplement, prospectus supplement, prospectus and prospectus addendum. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.

 

Price to Public (1)

Fees and Commissions (2)

Proceeds to Issuer

Per note

$1,000

$10

$990

Total

$3,710,000

$37,100

$3,672,900

(1) See “Supplemental Use of Proceeds” in this pricing supplement for information about the components of the price to public of the notes.

(2) J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, which we refer to as JPMS, acting as agent for JPMorgan Financial, will pay all of the selling commissions of $10.00 per $1,000 principal amount note it receives from us to other affiliated or unaffiliated dealers. See “Plan of Distribution (Conflicts of Interest)” in the accompanying product supplement.

The estimated value of the notes, when the terms of the notes were set, was $980.00 per $1,000 principal amount note. See “The Estimated Value of the Notes” in this pricing supplement for additional information.

The notes are not bank deposits, are not insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or any other governmental agency and are not obligations of, or guaranteed by, a bank.

 

 

 

 

 

Additional Terms Specific to the Notes

You should read this pricing supplement together with the accompanying prospectus, as supplemented by the accompanying prospectus supplement relating to our Series A medium-term notes, of which these notes are a part, the accompanying prospectus addendum and the more detailed information contained in the accompanying product supplement. This pricing supplement, together with the documents listed below, contains the terms of the notes and supersedes all other prior or contemporaneous oral statements as well as any other written materials including preliminary or indicative pricing terms, correspondence, trade ideas, structures for implementation, sample structures, fact sheets, brochures or other educational materials of ours. You should carefully consider, among other things, the matters set forth in the “Risk Factors” sections of the accompanying prospectus supplement and the accompanying product supplement and in Annex A to the accompanying prospectus addendum, as the notes involve risks not associated with conventional debt securities. We urge you to consult your investment, legal, tax, accounting and other advisers before you invest in the notes.

You may access these documents on the SEC website at www.sec.gov as follows (or if such address has changed, by reviewing our filings for the relevant date on the SEC website):

Product supplement no. 2-I dated April 13, 2023:

http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/19617/000121390023029567/ea151907_424b2.pdf

Prospectus supplement and prospectus, each dated April 13, 2023:

http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/19617/000095010323005751/crt_dp192097-424b2.pdf

Prospectus addendum dated June 3, 2024:

http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1665650/000095010324007599/dp211753_424b3.htm

 

Our Central Index Key, or CIK, on the SEC website is 1665650, and JPMorgan Chase & Co.’s CIK is 19617. As used in this pricing supplement, “we,” “us” and “our” refer to JPMorgan Financial.

Supplemental Terms of the Notes

For purposes of the notes offered by this pricing supplement:

(1) the consequences of a commodity hedging disruption event are described under “General Terms of Notes — Consequences of a Commodity Hedging Disruption Event — Acceleration of the Notes” in the accompanying product supplement; and

(2) the Observation Date is a “Determination Date” as described in the accompanying product supplement and is subject to postponement as described under “General Terms of Notes — Postponement of a Determination Date — Notes Linked to a Single Underlying — Notes Linked to a Single Commodity or Commodity Futures Contract” in the accompanying product supplement.

 

The notes are not commodity futures contracts or swaps and are not regulated under the Commodity Exchange Act of 1936, as amended (the “Commodity Exchange Act”). The notes are offered pursuant to an exemption from regulation under the Commodity Exchange Act, commonly known as the hybrid instrument exemption, that is available to securities that have one or more payments indexed to the value, level or rate of one or more commodities, as set out in section 2(f) of that statute. Accordingly, you are not afforded any protection provided by the Commodity Exchange Act or any regulation promulgated by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

Any values of the Commodity Futures Contract, and any values derived therefrom, included in this pricing supplement may be corrected, in the event of manifest error or inconsistency, by amendment of this pricing supplement and the corresponding terms of the notes.  Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the indenture governing the notes, that amendment will become effective without consent of the holders of the notes or any other party.

 

JPMorgan Structured Investments —  PS-1
Digital Buffered Notes Linked to a WTI Crude Oil Futures Contract

 

What Is the Total Return on the Notes at Maturity, Assuming a Range of Performances for the Commodity Futures Contract?

The following table and examples illustrate the hypothetical total return and the hypothetical payment at maturity on the notes. The “total return” as used in this pricing supplement is the number, expressed as a percentage, that results from comparing the payment at maturity per $1,000 principal amount note to $1,000. Each hypothetical total return or payment at maturity set forth below assumes a Contract Strike Price of $100 and reflects the Contingent Digital Return of 11.90%, the Downside Leverage Factor of 1.29870 and the Buffer Percentage of 23.00%.

The hypothetical Contract Strike Price of $100 has been chosen for illustrative purposes only and does not represent the actual Contract Strike Price. The actual Contract Strike Price is the Contract Price on the Strike Date and is specified under “Key Terms — Contract Strike Price” in this pricing supplement. For historical data regarding the actual Contract Prices, please see the historical information set forth under “Historical Information” in this pricing supplement.

Each hypothetical total return or payment at maturity set forth below is for illustrative purposes only and may not be the actual total return or payment at maturity applicable to a purchaser of the notes. The numbers appearing in the following table and in the examples below have been rounded for ease of analysis.

Ending Contract

Price

Contract Return

Total Return

$180.00

80.00%

11.900%

$170.00

70.00%

11.900%

$160.00

60.00%

11.900%

$150.00

50.00%

11.900%

$140.00

40.00%

11.900%

$130.00

30.00%

11.900%

$120.00

20.00%

11.900%

$111.90

11.90%

11.900%

$110.00

10.00%

11.900%

$105.00

5.00%

11.900%

$102.50

2.50%

11.900%

$100.00

0.00%

11.900%

$97.50

-2.50%

11.900%

$95.00

-5.00%

11.900%

$90.00

-10.00%

11.900%

$80.00

-20.00%

11.900%

$77.00

-23.00%

11.900%

$76.99

-23.01%

-0.013%

$70.00

-30.00%

-9.091%

$60.00

-40.00%

-22.078%

$50.00

-50.00%

-35.065%

$40.00

-60.00%

-48.052%

$30.00

-70.00%

-61.039%

$20.00

-80.00%

-74.026%

$10.00

-90.00%

-87.013%

$0.00

-100.00%

-100.000%

JPMorgan Structured Investments —  PS-2
Digital Buffered Notes Linked to a WTI Crude Oil Futures Contract

 

Hypothetical Examples of Amount Payable at Maturity

The following examples illustrate how the payment at maturity in different hypothetical scenarios is calculated.

Example 1: The price of the Commodity Futures Contract increases from the Contract Strike Price of $100 to an Ending Contract Price of $105.

Because the Ending Contract Price of $105 is greater than the Contract Strike Price of $100, regardless of the Contract Return, the investor receives a payment at maturity of $1,119.00 per $1,000 principal amount note, calculated as follows:

$1,000 + ($1,000 × 11.90%) = $1,119.00

Example 2: The price of the Commodity Futures Contract decreases from the Contract Strike Price of $100 to an Ending Contract Price of $77.

Although the Contract Return is negative, because the Ending Contract Price of $77 is less than the Contract Strike Price of $100 by up to the Buffer Percentage of 23.00%, the investor receives a payment at maturity of $1,119.00 per $1,000 principal amount note, calculated as follows:

$1,000 + ($1,000 × 11.90%) = $1,119.00

Example 3: The price of the Commodity Futures Contract increases from the Contract Strike Price of $100 to an Ending Contract Price of $140.

Because the Ending Contract Price of $140 is greater than the Contract Strike Price of $100 and although the Contract Return of 40% exceeds the Contingent Digital Return of 11.90%, the investor is entitled to only the Contingent Digital Return and receives a payment at maturity of $1,119.00 per $1,000 principal amount note, calculated as follows:

$1,000 + ($1,000 × 11.90%) = $1,119.00

Example 4: The price of the Commodity Futures Contract decreases from the Contract Strike Price of $100 to an Ending Contract Price of $40.

Because the Ending Contract Price of $40 is less than the Contract Strike Price of $100 by more than the Buffer Percentage of 23.00% and the Contract Return is -60.00%, the investor receives a payment at maturity of $519.481 per $1,000 principal amount note, calculated as follows:

$1,000 + [$1,000 × (-60.00% + 23.00%) × 1.29870] = $519.481

The hypothetical returns and hypothetical payments on the notes shown above apply only if you hold the notes for their entire term. These hypotheticals do not reflect fees or expenses that would be associated with any sale in the secondary market. If these fees and expenses were included, the hypothetical returns and hypothetical payments shown above would likely be lower.

JPMorgan Structured Investments —  PS-3

Digital Buffered Notes Linked to a WTI Crude Oil Futures Contract

 

Selected Purchase Considerations

FIXED APPRECIATION POTENTIAL — If the Ending Contract Price is greater than or equal to the Contract Strike Price or is less than the Contract Strike Price by up to the Buffer Percentage, you will receive a fixed return equal to the Contingent Digital Return of 11.90% at maturity, which also reflects the maximum return on the notes at maturity. Because the notes are our unsecured and unsubordinated obligations, the payment of which is fully and unconditionally guaranteed by JPMorgan Chase & Co., payment of any amount on the notes is subject to our ability to pay our obligations as they become due and JPMorgan Chase & Co.’s ability to pay its obligations as they become due.

LIMITED PROTECTION AGAINST LOSS — We will pay you at least your principal back at maturity if the Ending Contract Price is greater than or equal to the Contract Strike Price or is less than the Contract Strike Price by up to the Buffer Percentage of 23.00%. If the Ending Contract Price is less than the Contract Strike Price by more than the Buffer Percentage, you will lose 1.29870% of your principal amount at maturity for every 1% that the Ending Contract Price is less than the Contract Strike Price by more than the Buffer Percentage. Accordingly, under these circumstances, you will lose some or all of your principal amount at maturity.

RETURN LINKED TO A WTI CRUDE OIL FUTURES CONTRACT The return on the notes is linked to the official settlement price per barrel on the NYMEX of the first nearby month (or, in some circumstances, the second nearby month) futures contract for WTI crude oil, stated in U.S. dollars, as made public by the NYMEX and displayed on the applicable Bloomberg page. For additional information about the Commodity Futures Contract, see the information set forth under “The Underlyings — Commodity Futures Contracts” in the accompanying product supplement.

TAX TREATMENT You should review carefully the section entitled “Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences” in the accompanying product supplement no. 2-I. The following discussion, when read in combination with that section, constitutes the full opinion of our special tax counsel, Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP, regarding the material U.S. federal income tax consequences of owning and disposing of notes.

Based on current market conditions, in the opinion of our special tax counsel it is reasonable to treat the notes as “open transactions” that are not debt instruments for U.S. federal income tax purposes, as more fully described in “Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences — Tax Consequences to U.S. Holders — Notes Treated as Open Transactions That Are Not Debt Instruments” in the accompanying product supplement. Assuming this treatment is respected, the gain or loss on your notes should be treated as long-term capital gain or loss if you hold your notes for more than a year, whether or not you are an initial purchaser of notes at the issue price. However, the IRS or a court may not respect this treatment, in which case the timing and character of any income or loss on the notes could be materially and adversely affected. In addition, in 2007 Treasury and the IRS released a notice requesting comments on the U.S. federal income tax treatment of “prepaid forward contracts” and similar instruments. The notice focuses in particular on whether to require investors in these instruments to accrue income over the term of their investment. It also asks for comments on a number of related topics, including the character of income or loss with respect to these instruments; the relevance of factors such as the nature of the underlying property to which the instruments are linked; the degree, if any, to which income (including any mandated accruals) realized by non-U.S. investors should be subject to withholding tax; and whether these instruments are or should be subject to the “constructive ownership” regime, which very generally can operate to recharacterize certain long-term capital gain as ordinary income and impose a notional interest charge. While the notice requests comments on appropriate transition rules and effective dates, any Treasury regulations or other guidance promulgated after consideration of these issues could materially and adversely affect the tax consequences of an investment in the notes, possibly with retroactive effect. You should consult your tax adviser regarding the U.S. federal income tax consequences of an investment in the notes, including possible alternative treatments and the issues presented by this notice.

JPMorgan Structured Investments —  PS-4
Digital Buffered Notes Linked to a WTI Crude Oil Futures Contract

 

Selected Risk Considerations

An investment in the notes involves significant risks. Investing in the notes is not equivalent to investing directly in the Commodity Futures Contract or in any exchange-traded or over-the-counter instruments based on, or other instruments linked to, the foregoing. These risks are explained in more detail in the “Risk Factors” sections of the accompanying prospectus supplement and the accompanying product supplement and in Annex A to the accompanying prospectus addendum.

Risks Relating to the Notes Generally

YOUR INVESTMENT IN THE NOTES MAY RESULT IN A LOSS — The notes do not guarantee any return of principal.  The return on the notes at maturity is dependent on the performance of the Commodity Futures Contract and will depend on whether, and the extent to which, the Contract Return is positive or negative. Your investment will be exposed to a loss on a leveraged basis if the Ending Contract Price is less than the Contract Strike Price by more than the Buffer Percentage.  In this case, for every 1% that the Ending Contract Price is less than the Contract Strike Price by more than the Buffer Percentage, you will lose an amount equal to 1.29870% of the principal amount of your notes.  Under these circumstances, you will lose some or all of your principal amount at maturity.

YOUR MAXIMUM GAIN ON THE NOTES IS LIMITED TO THE CONTINGENT DIGITAL RETURN — If the Ending Contract Price is greater than or equal to the Contract Strike Price or is less than the Contract Strike Price by up to the Buffer Percentage, for each $1,000 principal amount note, you will receive at maturity $1,000 plus an additional return equal to the Contingent Digital Return, regardless of any appreciation in the Commodity Futures Contract, which may be significant.

YOUR ABILITY TO RECEIVE THE CONTINGENT DIGITAL RETURN MAY TERMINATE ON THE OBSERVATION DATE — If the Ending Contract Price is less than the Contract Strike Price by more than the Buffer Percentage, you will not be entitled to receive the Contingent Digital Return at maturity. Under these circumstances, you will lose some or all of your principal amount at maturity.

CREDIT RISKS OF JPMORGAN FINANCIAL AND JPMORGAN CHASE & CO. — The notes are subject to our and JPMorgan Chase & Co.’s credit risks, and our and JPMorgan Chase & Co.’s credit ratings and credit spreads may adversely affect the market value of the notes.  Investors are dependent on our and JPMorgan Chase & Co.’s ability to pay all amounts due on the notes. Any actual or potential change in our or JPMorgan Chase & Co.’s creditworthiness or credit spreads, as determined by the market for taking that credit risk, is likely to adversely affect the value of the notes.  If we and JPMorgan Chase & Co. were to default on our payment obligations, you may not receive any amounts owed to you under the notes and you could lose your entire investment.

AS A FINANCE SUBSIDIARY, JPMORGAN FINANCIAL HAS NO INDEPENDENT OPERATIONS AND HAS LIMITED ASSETS As a finance subsidiary of JPMorgan Chase & Co., we have no independent operations beyond the issuance and administration of our securities and the collection of intercompany obligations. Aside from the initial capital contribution from JPMorgan Chase & Co., substantially all of our assets relate to obligations of JPMorgan Chase & Co. to make payments under loans made by us to JPMorgan Chase & Co. or under other intercompany agreements. As a result, we are dependent upon payments from JPMorgan Chase & Co. to meet our obligations under the notes. We are not a key operating subsidiary of JPMorgan Chase & Co. and in a bankruptcy or resolution of JPMorgan Chase & Co. we are not expected to have sufficient resources to meet our obligations in respect of the notes as they come due. If JPMorgan Chase & Co. does not make payments to us and we are unable to make payments on the notes, you may have to seek payment under the related guarantee by JPMorgan Chase & Co., and that guarantee will rank pari passu with all other unsecured and unsubordinated obligations of JPMorgan Chase & Co. For more information, see the accompanying prospectus addendum.

OWNING THE NOTES IS NOT THE SAME AS OWNING WTI CRUDE OIL FUTURES CONTRACTSThe return on your notes will not reflect the return you would realize if you actually purchased WTI crude oil futures contracts or exchange-traded or over-the-counter instruments based on WTI crude oil futures contracts. You will not have any rights that holders of such assets or instruments have.

WE MAY ACCELERATE YOUR NOTES IF A COMMODITY HEDGING DISRUPTION EVENT OCCURS — If we or our affiliates are unable to effect transactions necessary to hedge our obligations under the notes due to a commodity hedging disruption event, we may, in our sole and absolute discretion, accelerate the payment on your notes and pay you an amount determined in good faith and in a commercially reasonable manner by the calculation agent. If the payment on your notes is accelerated, your investment may result in a loss and you may not be able to reinvest your money in a comparable investment. Please see “General Terms of Notes — Consequences of a Commodity Hedging Disruption Event — Acceleration of the Notes” in the accompanying product supplement for more information.

NO INTEREST PAYMENTS — As a holder of the notes, you will not receive any interest payments.

LACK OF LIQUIDITY — The notes will not be listed on any securities exchange. JPMS intends to offer to purchase the notes in the secondary market but is not required to do so. Even if there is a secondary market, it may not provide enough liquidity to allow you to trade or sell the notes easily. Because other dealers are not likely to make a secondary market for the notes, the price at which you may be able to trade your notes is likely to depend on the price, if any, at which JPMS is willing to buy the notes.

Risks Relating to Conflicts of Interest

JPMorgan Structured Investments —  PS-5

Digital Buffered Notes Linked to a WTI Crude Oil Futures Contract

 

POTENTIAL CONFLICTS — We and our affiliates play a variety of roles in connection with the issuance of the notes, including acting as calculation agent and as an agent of the offering of the notes, hedging our obligations under the notes and making the assumptions used to determine the pricing of the notes and the estimated value of the notes when the terms of the notes are set, which we refer to as the estimated value of the notes. In performing these duties, our and JPMorgan Chase & Co.’s economic interests and the economic interests of the calculation agent and other affiliates of ours are potentially adverse to your interests as an investor in the notes. In addition, our and JPMorgan Chase & Co.’s business activities, including hedging and trading activities, could cause our and JPMorgan Chase & Co.’s economic interests to be adverse to yours and could adversely affect any payment on the notes and the value of the notes. It is possible that hedging or trading activities of ours or our affiliates in connection with the notes could result in substantial returns for us or our affiliates while the value of the notes declines. Please refer to “Risk Factors — Risks Relating to Conflicts of Interest” in the accompanying product supplement for additional information about these risks.

Risks Relating to the Estimated Value and Secondary Market Prices of the Notes

THE ESTIMATED VALUE OF THE NOTES IS LOWER THAN THE ORIGINAL ISSUE PRICE (PRICE TO PUBLIC) OF THE NOTES — The estimated value of the notes is only an estimate determined by reference to several factors. The original issue price of the notes exceeds the estimated value of the notes because costs associated with selling, structuring and hedging the notes are included in the original issue price of the notes. These costs include the selling commissions, the projected profits, if any, that our affiliates expect to realize for assuming risks inherent in hedging our obligations under the notes and the estimated cost of hedging our obligations under the notes. See “The Estimated Value of the Notes” in this pricing supplement.

THE ESTIMATED VALUE OF THE NOTES DOES NOT REPRESENT FUTURE VALUES OF THE NOTES AND MAY DIFFER FROM OTHERS’ ESTIMATES — The estimated value of the notes is determined by reference to internal pricing models of our affiliates when the terms of the notes are set. This estimated value of the notes is based on market conditions and other relevant factors existing at that time and assumptions about market parameters, which can include volatility, interest rates and other factors. Different pricing models and assumptions could provide valuations for the notes that are greater than or less than the estimated value of the notes. In addition, market conditions and other relevant factors in the future may change, and any assumptions may prove to be incorrect. On future dates, the value of the notes could change significantly based on, among other things, changes in market conditions, our or JPMorgan Chase & Co.’s creditworthiness, interest rate movements and other relevant factors, which may impact the price, if any, at which JPMS would be willing to buy notes from you in secondary market transactions. See “The Estimated Value of the Notes” in this pricing supplement.

THE ESTIMATED VALUE OF THE NOTES IS DERIVED BY REFERENCE TO AN INTERNAL FUNDING RATE — The internal funding rate used in the determination of the estimated value of the notes may differ from the market-implied funding rate for vanilla fixed income instruments of a similar maturity issued by JPMorgan Chase & Co. or its affiliates. Any difference may be based on, among other things, our and our affiliates’ view of the funding value of the notes as well as the higher issuance, operational and ongoing liability management costs of the notes in comparison to those costs for the conventional fixed income instruments of JPMorgan Chase & Co. This internal funding rate is based on certain market inputs and assumptions, which may prove to be incorrect, and is intended to approximate the prevailing market replacement funding rate for the notes. The use of an internal funding rate and any potential changes to that rate may have an adverse effect on the terms of the notes and any secondary market prices of the notes. See “The Estimated Value of the Notes” in this pricing supplement.

THE VALUE OF THE NOTES AS PUBLISHED BY JPMS (AND WHICH MAY BE REFLECTED ON CUSTOMER ACCOUNT STATEMENTS) MAY BE HIGHER THAN THE THEN-CURRENT ESTIMATED VALUE OF THE NOTES FOR A LIMITED TIME PERIOD — We generally expect that some of the costs included in the original issue price of the notes will be partially paid back to you in connection with any repurchases of your notes by JPMS in an amount that will decline to zero over an initial predetermined period. These costs can include selling commissions, projected hedging profits, if any, and, in some circumstances, estimated hedging costs and our internal secondary market funding rates for structured debt issuances. See “Secondary Market Prices of the Notes” in this pricing supplement for additional information relating to this initial period. Accordingly, the estimated value of your notes during this initial period may be lower than the value of the notes as published by JPMS (and which may be shown on your customer account statements).

SECONDARY MARKET PRICES OF THE NOTES WILL LIKELY BE LOWER THAN THE ORIGINAL ISSUE PRICE OF THE NOTES — Any secondary market prices of the notes will likely be lower than the original issue price of the notes because, among other things, secondary market prices take into account our internal secondary market funding rates for structured debt issuances and, also, because secondary market prices may exclude selling commissions, projected hedging profits, if any, and estimated hedging costs that are included in the original issue price of the notes. As a result, the price, if any, at which JPMS will be willing to buy notes from you in secondary market transactions, if at all, is likely to be lower than the original issue price. Any sale by you prior to the Maturity Date could result in a substantial loss to you. See the immediately following risk consideration for information about additional factors that will impact any secondary market prices of the notes.

The notes are not designed to be short-term trading instruments. Accordingly, you should be able and willing to hold your notes to maturity. See “— Risks Relating to the Notes Generally — Lack of Liquidity” above.

JPMorgan Structured Investments —  PS-6
Digital Buffered Notes Linked to a WTI Crude Oil Futures Contract

 

SECONDARY MARKET PRICES OF THE NOTES WILL BE IMPACTED BY MANY ECONOMIC AND MARKET FACTORS — The secondary market price of the notes during their term will be impacted by a number of economic and market factors, which may either offset or magnify each other, aside from the selling commissions, projected hedging profits, if any, estimated hedging costs and the Contract Price, including:

any actual or potential change in our or JPMorgan Chase & Co.’s creditworthiness or credit spreads;

customary bid-ask spreads for similarly sized trades;

our internal secondary market funding rates for structured debt issuances;

the actual and expected volatility in the Contract Price of the Commodity Futures Contract;

the time to maturity of the notes;

supply and demand trends for WTI crude oil or the exchange-traded futures contracts on that commodity;

interest and yield rates in the market generally; and

a variety of other economic, financial, political, regulatory, geographical, agricultural, meteorological and judicial events.

Additionally, independent pricing vendors and/or third party broker-dealers may publish a price for the notes, which may also be reflected on customer account statements. This price may be different (higher or lower) than the price of the notes, if any, at which JPMS may be willing to purchase your notes in the secondary market.

Risks Relating to the Commodity Futures Contract

COMMODITY FUTURES CONTRACTS ARE SUBJECT TO UNCERTAIN LEGAL AND REGULATORY REGIMES Commodity futures contracts are subject to legal and regulatory regimes that may change in ways that could adversely affect our ability to hedge our obligations under the notes and affect the price of the Commodity Futures Contract.  Any future regulatory changes may have a substantial adverse effect on the value of your notes.  Additionally, in October 2020, the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission adopted rules to establish revised or new position limits on 25 agricultural, metals and energy commodity derivatives contracts.  The limits apply to a person’s combined position in the specified 25 futures contracts and options on futures (“core referenced futures contracts”), futures and options on futures directly or indirectly linked to the core referenced futures contracts, and economically equivalent swaps.  These rules came into effect on January 1, 2022 for covered futures and options on futures contracts and on January 1, 2023 for covered swaps.  The rules may reduce liquidity in the exchange-traded market for those commodity-based futures contracts, which may, in turn, have an adverse effect on any payments on the notes.  Furthermore, we or our affiliates may be unable as a result of those restrictions to effect transactions necessary to hedge our obligations under the notes resulting in a commodity hedging disruption event, in which case we may, in our sole and absolute discretion, accelerate the payment on your notes.  See “— Risks Relating to the Notes Generally — We May Accelerate Your Notes If a Commodity Hedging Disruption Event Occurs” above.

PRICES OF COMMODITY FUTURES CONTRACTS ARE CHARACTERIZED BY HIGH AND UNPREDICTABLE VOLATILITY — Market prices of commodity futures contracts tend to be highly volatile and may fluctuate rapidly based on numerous factors, including the factors that affect the price of the commodity underlying the Commodity Futures Contract. See “— The Market Price of WTI Crude Oil Will Affect the Value of the Notes” below. The Contract Price is subject to variables that may be less significant to the values of traditional securities, such as stocks and bonds. These variables may create additional investment risks that cause the value of the notes to be more volatile than the values of traditional securities. As a general matter, the risk of low liquidity or volatile pricing around the maturity date of a commodity futures contract is greater than in the case of other futures contracts because (among other factors) a number of market participants take physical delivery of the underlying commodities. Many commodities are also highly cyclical. The high volatility and cyclical nature of commodity markets may render such an investment inappropriate as the focus of an investment portfolio.

THE MARKET PRICE OF WTI CRUDE OIL WILL AFFECT THE VALUE OF THE NOTES — Because the notes are linked to the performance of the Contract Price of the Commodity Futures Contract, we expect that generally the market value of the notes will depend in part on the market price of WTI crude oil. The price of WTI crude oil is primarily affected by the global demand for and supply of crude oil, but is also influenced significantly from time to time by speculative actions and by currency exchange rates. Crude oil prices are volatile and subject to dislocation. Demand for refined petroleum products by consumers, as well as the agricultural, manufacturing and transportation industries, affects the price of crude oil. Crude oil’s end-use as a refined product is often as transport fuel, industrial fuel and in-home heating fuel. Potential for substitution in most areas exists, although considerations, including relative cost, often limit substitution levels. Because the precursors of demand for petroleum products are linked to economic activity, demand will tend to reflect economic conditions. Demand is also influenced by government regulations, such as environmental or consumption policies. In addition to general economic activity and demand, prices for crude oil are affected by political events, labor activity and, in particular, direct government intervention (such as embargos) or supply disruptions in major oil producing regions of the world. These events tend to affect oil prices worldwide, regardless of the location of the event. Supply for crude oil may increase or decrease depending on many factors. These include production decisions by the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (“OPEC”) and other crude oil producers. Crude oil prices are determined with significant influence by OPEC. OPEC has the potential to influence oil prices worldwide because its members possess a significant portion of the world’s oil supply. In the event of sudden disruptions in the supplies of oil, such as those caused by war (e.g., Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and resulting sanctions), natural events, accidents or acts of terrorism, prices of oil futures contracts could become extremely volatile and unpredictable. Also, sudden and dramatic changes in the futures market may occur, for example, upon a cessation of hostilities that may exist in countries producing oil, the introduction of new or previously withheld supplies into the market or the introduction of substitute

JPMorgan Structured Investments —  PS-7

Digital Buffered Notes Linked to a WTI Crude Oil Futures Contract

 

products or commodities. Crude oil prices may also be affected by short-term changes in supply and demand because of trading activities in the oil market and seasonality (e.g., weather conditions such as hurricanes). It is not possible to predict the aggregate effect of all or any combination of these factors.

A DECISION BY THE NYMEX TO INCREASE MARGIN REQUIREMENTS FOR WTI CRUDE OIL FUTURES CONTRACTS MAY AFFECT THE CONTRACT PRICE — If the NYMEX increases the amount of collateral required to be posted to hold positions in the futures contracts on WTI crude oil (i.e., the margin requirements), market participants who are unwilling or unable to post additional collateral may liquidate their positions, which may cause the Contract Price to decline significantly.

THE NOTES DO NOT OFFER DIRECT EXPOSURE TO COMMODITY SPOT PRICES — The Commodity Futures Contract reflects the price of a futures contract, not a physical commodity (or its spot price). The price of a futures contract reflects the expected value of the commodity upon delivery in the future, whereas the spot price of a commodity reflects the immediate delivery value of the commodity. A variety of factors can lead to a disparity between the expected future price of a commodity and the spot price at a given point in time, such as the cost of storing the commodity for the term of the futures contract, interest charges incurred to finance the purchase of the commodity and expectations concerning supply and demand for the commodity. The price movements of a futures contract are typically correlated with the movements of the spot price of the referenced commodity, but the correlation is generally imperfect and price movements in the spot market may not be reflected in the futures market (and vice versa). Accordingly, the notes may underperform a similar investment that is linked only to commodity spot prices.

SINGLE COMMODITY FUTURES CONTRACT PRICES TEND TO BE MORE VOLATILE THAN, AND MAY NOT CORRELATE WITH, THE PRICES OF COMMODITIES GENERALLY — The notes are not linked to a diverse basket of commodities, commodity futures contracts or a broad-based commodity index. The prices of the Commodity Futures Contract may not correlate to the price of commodities or commodity futures contracts generally and may diverge significantly from the prices of commodities or commodity futures contracts generally. Because the notes are linked to a single commodity futures contract, they carry greater risk and may be more volatile than notes linked to the prices of multiple commodities or commodity futures contracts or a broad-based commodity index.

SUSPENSION OR DISRUPTIONS OF MARKET TRADING IN THE COMMODITY MARKETS AND RELATED FUTURES MARKETS MAY ADVERSELY AFFECT THE CONTRACT PRICE, AND THEREFORE THE VALUE OF THE NOTES — The commodity markets are subject to temporary distortions or other disruptions due to various factors, including the lack of liquidity in the markets, the participation of speculators and government regulation and intervention. In addition, U.S. futures exchanges and some foreign exchanges have regulations that limit the amount of fluctuation in futures contract prices that may occur during a single day. These limits are generally referred to as “daily price fluctuation limits” and the maximum or minimum price of a contract on any given day as a result of these limits is referred to as a “limit price.” Once the limit price has been reached in a particular contract, no trades may be made at a different price. Limit prices have the effect of precluding trading in a particular contract or forcing the liquidation of contracts at disadvantageous times or prices. These circumstances could adversely affect the Contract Price of the Commodity Futures Contract and, therefore, the value of your notes.

 

JPMorgan Structured Investments —  PS-8
Digital Buffered Notes Linked to a WTI Crude Oil Futures Contract

 

Historical Information

The following graph sets forth the historical performance of the Commodity Futures Contract based on the weekly historical Contract Prices of the Commodity Futures Contract from January 3, 2020 through June 27, 2025. The Contract Price of the Commodity Futures Contract on July 1, 2025 was $65.45. We obtained the Contract Prices of the Commodity Futures Contract above and below from Bloomberg, without independent verification.

The historical Contract Prices should not be taken as an indication of future performance, and no assurance can be given as to the Contract Price on the Observation Date. There can be no assurance that the performance of the Commodity Futures Contract will result in the return of any of your principal amount.

The Estimated Value of the Notes

The estimated value of the notes set forth on the cover of this pricing supplement is equal to the sum of the values of the following hypothetical components: (1) a fixed-income debt component with the same maturity as the notes, valued using the internal funding rate described below, and (2) the derivative or derivatives underlying the economic terms of the notes. The estimated value of the notes does not represent a minimum price at which JPMS would be willing to buy your notes in any secondary market (if any exists) at any time. The internal funding rate used in the determination of the estimated value of the notes may differ from the market-implied funding rate for vanilla fixed income instruments of a similar maturity issued by JPMorgan Chase & Co. or its affiliates. Any difference may be based on, among other things, our and our affiliates’ view of the funding value of the notes as well as the higher issuance, operational and ongoing liability management costs of the notes in comparison to those costs for the conventional fixed income instruments of JPMorgan Chase & Co. This internal funding rate is based on certain market inputs and assumptions, which may prove to be incorrect, and is intended to approximate the prevailing market replacement funding rate for the notes. The use of an internal funding rate and any potential changes to that rate may have an adverse effect on the terms of the notes and any secondary market prices of the notes. For additional information, see “Selected Risk Considerations — Risks Relating to the Estimated Value and Secondary Market Prices of the Notes — The Estimated Value of the Notes Is Derived by Reference to an Internal Funding Rate” in this pricing supplement. The value of the derivative or derivatives underlying the economic terms of the notes is derived from internal pricing models of our affiliates. These models are dependent on inputs such as the traded market prices of comparable derivative instruments and on various other inputs, some of which are market-observable, and which can include volatility, interest rates and other factors, as well as assumptions about future market events and/or environments. Accordingly, the estimated value of the notes is determined when the terms of the notes are set based on market conditions and other relevant factors and assumptions existing at that time. See “Selected Risk Considerations — Risks Relating to the Estimated Value and Secondary Market Prices of the Notes — The Estimated Value of the Notes Does Not Represent Future Values of the Notes and May Differ from Others’ Estimates” in this pricing supplement.

The estimated value of the notes is lower than the original issue price of the notes because costs associated with selling, structuring and hedging the notes are included in the original issue price of the notes. These costs include the selling commissions paid to JPMS and other affiliated or unaffiliated dealers, the projected profits, if any, that our affiliates expect to realize for assuming risks inherent in hedging our obligations under the notes and the estimated cost of hedging our obligations under the notes. Because hedging our obligations entails risk and may be influenced by market forces beyond our control, this hedging may result in a profit that is more or less than expected, or it may result in a loss. We or one or more of our affiliates will retain any profits realized in hedging our obligations under the notes. See “Selected Risk Considerations — Risks Relating to the Estimated Value and Secondary Market Prices of

JPMorgan Structured Investments —  PS-9
Digital Buffered Notes Linked to a WTI Crude Oil Futures Contract

 

the Notes — The Estimated Value of the Notes Is Lower Than the Original Issue Price (Price to Public) of the Notes” in this pricing supplement.

Secondary Market Prices of the Notes

For information about factors that will impact any secondary market prices of the notes, see “Selected Risk Considerations — Risks Relating to the Estimated Value and Secondary Market Prices of the Notes — Secondary Market Prices of the Notes Will Be Impacted by Many Economic and Market Factors” in this pricing supplement. In addition, we generally expect that some of the costs included in the original issue price of the notes will be partially paid back to you in connection with any repurchases of your notes by JPMS in an amount that will decline to zero over an initial predetermined period that is intended to be the shorter of six months and one-half of the stated term of the notes. The length of any such initial period reflects the structure of the notes, whether our affiliates expect to earn a profit in connection with our hedging activities, the estimated costs of hedging the notes and when these costs are incurred, as determined by our affiliates. See “Selected Risk Considerations — Risks Relating to the Estimated Value and Secondary Market Prices of the Notes — The Value of the Notes as Published by JPMS (and Which May Be Reflected on Customer Account Statements) May Be Higher Than the Then-Current Estimated Value of the Notes for a Limited Time Period.”

Supplemental Use of Proceeds

The notes are offered to meet investor demand for products that reflect the risk-return profile and market exposure provided by the notes. See “What Is the Total Return on the Notes at Maturity, Assuming a Range of Performances for the Commodity Futures Contract?” and “Hypothetical Examples of Amount Payable at Maturity” in this pricing supplement for an illustration of the risk-return profile of the notes and “Selected Purchase Considerations — Return Linked to a WTI Crude Oil Futures Contract” in this pricing supplement for a description of the market exposure provided by the notes.

The original issue price of the notes is equal to the estimated value of the notes plus the selling commissions paid to JPMS and other affiliated or unaffiliated dealers, plus (minus) the projected profits (losses) that our affiliates expect to realize for assuming risks inherent in hedging our obligations under the notes, plus the estimated cost of hedging our obligations under the notes.

Validity of the Notes and the Guarantee

In the opinion of Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP, as special products counsel to JPMorgan Financial and JPMorgan Chase & Co., when the notes offered by this pricing supplement have been issued by JPMorgan Financial pursuant to the indenture, the trustee and/or paying agent has made, in accordance with the instructions from JPMorgan Financial, the appropriate entries or notations in its records relating to the master global note that represents such notes (the “master note”), and such notes have been delivered against payment as contemplated herein, such notes will be valid and binding obligations of JPMorgan Financial and the related guarantee will constitute a valid and binding obligation of

JPMorgan Chase & Co., enforceable in accordance with their terms, subject to applicable bankruptcy, insolvency and similar laws affecting creditors’ rights generally, concepts of reasonableness and equitable principles of general applicability (including, without limitation, concepts of good faith, fair dealing and the lack of bad faith), provided that such counsel expresses no opinion as to (i) the effect of fraudulent conveyance, fraudulent transfer or similar provision of applicable law on the conclusions expressed above or (ii) any provision of the indenture that purports to avoid the effect of fraudulent conveyance, fraudulent transfer or similar provision of applicable law by limiting the amount of JPMorgan Chase & Co.’s obligation under the related guarantee. This opinion is given as of the date hereof and is limited to the laws of the State of New York, the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware and the Delaware Limited Liability Company Act. In addition, this opinion is subject to customary assumptions about the trustee’s authorization, execution and delivery of the indenture and its authentication of the master note and the validity, binding nature and enforceability of the indenture with respect to the trustee, all as stated in the letter of such counsel dated February 24, 2023, which was filed as an exhibit to the Registration Statement on Form S-3 by JPMorgan Financial and JPMorgan Chase & Co. on February 24, 2023.

 

JPMorgan Structured Investments —  PS-10

Digital Buffered Notes Linked to a WTI Crude Oil Futures Contract

FAQ

How much is GSK (GSK) paying for efimosfermin alfa?

GSK will pay up to US$2 billion, consisting of a US$1.2 billion upfront and up to US$800 million in milestones.

What diseases will efimosfermin target?

The investigational therapy targets MASH and ALD, both forms of steatotic liver disease (SLD).

When could efimosfermin potentially launch?

Management indicates a potential first launch in 2029, subject to successful Phase III trials and regulatory approval.

How does efimosfermin work?

It is a long-acting FGF21 analogue designed to reduce liver fat, lower inflammation, and reverse fibrosis via an antifibrotic mechanism.

Will GSK owe additional royalties on efimosfermin sales?

Yes. Beyond milestone payments, GSK will pay tiered royalties to Novartis on future net sales.
Inverse VIX S/T Futs ETNs due Mar22,2045

NYSE:VYLD

VYLD Rankings

VYLD Latest News

VYLD Latest SEC Filings

VYLD Stock Data

4.00M
National Commercial Banks
NEW YORK