STOCK TITAN

[424B2] MicroSectors Energy 3x Leveraged ETNs Prospectus Supplement

Filing Impact
(Low)
Filing Sentiment
(Neutral)
Form Type
424B2
Rhea-AI Filing Summary

Allied Gaming & Entertainment Inc. (AGAE) has released an amended preliminary Schedule 14A covering its combined 2024-2025 virtual annual meeting. Six proposals will be presented: (1) election of three Class B directors, (2) election of three Class C directors, (3) 2023 say-on-pay, (4) frequency of future say-on-pay votes, and (5-6) ratification of ZH CPA, LLC as independent auditor for fiscal-years 2024 and 2025.

Proxy contest. Activist shareholder Knighted Pastures, LLC and affiliates, holding roughly 31.5 % of outstanding common stock, has notified the company of its intent to run an opposition slate of three Class B and three Class C nominees and to seek removal of sitting director Yangyang Li. AGAE’s board rejects all Knighted nominees and has sued Knighted under Section 13(d), asking the U.S. District Court (C.D. Cal.) to declare Knighted’s second notice invalid and to block the opposition slate until proper Schedule 13D filings are made. Depending on the court’s ruling, shareholders may have to re-vote on a universal proxy card that includes Knighted’s candidates.

Board recommendations. The company urges investors to vote “FOR” the six management proposals, to use only the WHITE proxy card, and to withhold on Knighted’s names if they appear. The board also recommends a triennial (three-year) frequency for future say-on-pay votes.

Litigation and cost disclosures. Management details two Chancery Court actions initiated by Knighted in 2024 (both largely moot) and the current federal suit filed by the company on June 11 2025. Estimated incremental proxy-fight expenses total approximately $ [•], including engagement of Mackenzie Partners as proxy solicitor.

Governance structure. AGAE maintains a staggered (Class A/B/C) board. Assuming the company slate is elected, Class B terms will run to 2027 and Class C to 2028. Current Chief Financial Officer Roy Anderson has been nominated to fill a Class C seat, replacing outgoing director Yuanfei Qu.

Key implications for investors:

  • Potential change-in-control risk if Knighted captures four or more seats.
  • Short-term uncertainty around court outcome and proxy mechanics could depress voting participation and raise administrative cost.
  • Auditor continuity is expected through 2025, but material weaknesses identified in 2022-2023 internal-control reviews remain partly under remediation.

Allied Gaming & Entertainment Inc. (AGAE) ha pubblicato un emendamento preliminare al Schedule 14A relativo alla sua assemblea annuale virtuale combinata 2024-2025. Saranno presentate sei proposte: (1) elezione di tre amministratori di Classe B, (2) elezione di tre amministratori di Classe C, (3) voto consultivo sulla remunerazione 2023, (4) frequenza dei futuri voti consultivi sulla remunerazione, e (5-6) ratifica di ZH CPA, LLC come revisore indipendente per gli esercizi 2024 e 2025.

Contesa per il proxy. L’azionista attivista Knighted Pastures, LLC e affiliati, detentori di circa il 31,5% delle azioni ordinarie in circolazione, ha comunicato all’azienda l’intenzione di presentare una lista alternativa di tre candidati per la Classe B e tre per la Classe C, chiedendo inoltre la rimozione del direttore in carica Yangyang Li. Il consiglio di amministrazione di AGAE respinge tutti i candidati di Knighted e ha avviato una causa contro Knighted ai sensi della Sezione 13(d), chiedendo alla Corte Distrettuale degli Stati Uniti (C.D. Cal.) di dichiarare invalida la seconda comunicazione di Knighted e di bloccare la lista avversaria fino alla corretta presentazione dei moduli Schedule 13D. A seconda della decisione del tribunale, gli azionisti potrebbero dover votare nuovamente su una scheda proxy universale che includa i candidati di Knighted.

Raccomandazioni del consiglio. La società invita gli investitori a votare “A FAVORE” delle sei proposte della direzione, a utilizzare esclusivamente la scheda proxy BIANCA e a astenersi dal votare per i candidati di Knighted qualora comparissero. Il consiglio raccomanda inoltre una frequenza triennale per i futuri voti consultivi sulla remunerazione.

Contenziosi e costi. La direzione descrive due azioni legali avviate da Knighted presso la Corte di Cancelleria nel 2024 (entrambe in gran parte superate) e la causa federale attuale intentata dalla società l’11 giugno 2025. Le spese incrementali stimate per la contesa proxy sono circa $ [•], inclusi i costi per l’ingaggio di Mackenzie Partners come consulente per la raccolta dei proxy.

Struttura di governance. AGAE mantiene un consiglio con mandato scaglionato (Classi A/B/C). Se verrà eletta la lista della società, i mandati della Classe B dureranno fino al 2027 e quelli della Classe C fino al 2028. L’attuale Chief Financial Officer Roy Anderson è stato nominato per occupare un seggio di Classe C, in sostituzione del direttore uscente Yuanfei Qu.

Implicazioni chiave per gli investitori:

  • Rischio di cambiamento del controllo se Knighted ottiene quattro o più seggi.
  • Incertezza a breve termine sull’esito giudiziario e sulle modalità di voto potrebbe ridurre la partecipazione e aumentare i costi amministrativi.
  • La continuità del revisore è prevista fino al 2025, ma le debolezze significative individuate nelle revisioni interne 2022-2023 sono ancora in parte in fase di risoluzione.

Allied Gaming & Entertainment Inc. (AGAE) ha publicado un Schedule 14A preliminar enmendado referente a su junta anual virtual combinada 2024-2025. Se presentarán seis propuestas: (1) elección de tres directores Clase B, (2) elección de tres directores Clase C, (3) voto consultivo sobre remuneración 2023, (4) frecuencia de futuros votos consultivos sobre remuneración, y (5-6) ratificación de ZH CPA, LLC como auditor independiente para los ejercicios fiscales 2024 y 2025.

Contienda por el proxy. El accionista activista Knighted Pastures, LLC y afiliados, que poseen aproximadamente el 31,5 % de las acciones ordinarias en circulación, ha notificado a la empresa su intención de presentar una lista opositora con tres candidatos para la Clase B y tres para la Clase C, y buscar la remoción del director actual Yangyang Li. La junta de AGAE rechaza a todos los nominados de Knighted y ha demandado a Knighted bajo la Sección 13(d), solicitando al Tribunal de Distrito de EE.UU. (C.D. Cal.) que declare inválido el segundo aviso de Knighted y que bloquee la lista opositora hasta que se presenten correctamente los Schedule 13D. Según la decisión judicial, los accionistas podrían tener que votar nuevamente con una tarjeta proxy universal que incluya a los candidatos de Knighted.

Recomendaciones de la junta. La compañía insta a los inversores a votar “A FAVOR” de las seis propuestas de la administración, a usar únicamente la tarjeta proxy BLANCA y a abstenerse de votar por los nombres de Knighted si aparecen. La junta también recomienda una frecuencia trienal para futuros votos consultivos sobre remuneración.

Litigios y costos. La dirección detalla dos acciones en la Corte de Cancillería iniciadas por Knighted en 2024 (ambas mayormente irrelevantes) y la demanda federal actual presentada por la empresa el 11 de junio de 2025. Los gastos incrementales estimados por la contienda proxy suman aproximadamente $ [•], incluyendo la contratación de Mackenzie Partners como asesor de proxy.

Estructura de gobernanza. AGAE mantiene una junta escalonada (Clases A/B/C). Suponiendo que se elija la lista de la empresa, los mandatos de Clase B serán hasta 2027 y los de Clase C hasta 2028. El actual Director Financiero Roy Anderson ha sido nominado para ocupar un asiento de Clase C, en reemplazo del director saliente Yuanfei Qu.

Implicaciones clave para los inversores:

  • Riesgo potencial de cambio de control si Knighted obtiene cuatro o más escaños.
  • Incertidumbre a corto plazo sobre el resultado judicial y la mecánica del proxy podría disminuir la participación en la votación y aumentar los costos administrativos.
  • Se espera continuidad del auditor hasta 2025, pero las debilidades materiales identificadas en las revisiones de control interno 2022-2023 permanecen parcialmente en remediación.

Allied Gaming & Entertainment Inc.(AGAE)는 2024-2025년 통합 가상 연례 주주총회를 위한 수정된 예비 Schedule 14A를 공개했습니다. 총 6개의 안건이 상정됩니다: (1) 3명의 Class B 이사 선임, (2) 3명의 Class C 이사 선임, (3) 2023년 보수 승인 투표, (4) 향후 보수 승인 투표 빈도, (5-6) 2024년 및 2025년 회계연도 독립 감사인으로 ZH CPA, LLC 승인 건입니다.

대리투표 경쟁.31.5%의 보통주를 보유한 행동주의 주주 Knighted Pastures, LLC 및 계열사들은 회사에 Class B 후보 3명과 Class C 후보 3명으로 구성된 반대 명단을 제출하고 현 이사 Yangyang Li의 해임을 요구할 의사를 통보했습니다. AGAE 이사회는 Knighted의 모든 후보를 거부하며, 13(d)조에 따라 Knighted를 상대로 소송을 제기하여 미국 연방지방법원(C.D. Cal.)에 Knighted의 두 번째 통지를 무효로 선언하고 적절한 Schedule 13D 제출 전까지 반대 명단을 차단해 줄 것을 요청했습니다. 법원 판결에 따라 주주들은 Knighted 후보가 포함된 통합 대리투표용지로 재투표해야 할 수도 있습니다.

이사회 권고. 회사는 투자자들에게 6개 경영진 안건에 대해 “찬성” 투표하고 백색 대리투표용지만 사용할 것을 권장하며, Knighted 후보가 포함된 경우 해당 후보에 대해서는 기권할 것을 요청합니다. 또한 이사회는 향후 보수 승인 투표 빈도를 3년 주기로 권고합니다.

소송 및 비용 공개. 경영진은 2024년에 Knighted가 제기한 두 건의 챈서리 법원 소송(대부분 기각)과 2025년 6월 11일 회사가 제기한 현재 연방법원 소송에 대해 설명했습니다. 대리투표 분쟁에 따른 추가 비용은 약 $ [•]이며, 대리투표 대행사인 Mackenzie Partners 고용 비용도 포함됩니다.

지배구조 구조. AGAE는 단계별(Class A/B/C) 이사회 구조를 유지하고 있습니다. 회사 명단이 선출될 경우 Class B 임기는 2027년까지, Class C 임기는 2028년까지입니다. 현재 최고재무책임자(CFO) Roy Anderson은 퇴임하는 Yuanfei Qu 이사를 대신해 Class C 이사 후보로 지명되었습니다.

투자자에게 주요 시사점:

  • Knighted가 4석 이상 확보할 경우 경영권 변경 위험이 있습니다.
  • 법원 판결 및 대리투표 절차에 대한 단기 불확실성이 투표 참여율을 낮추고 행정 비용을 증가시킬 수 있습니다.
  • 감사인은 2025년까지 연속성을 유지할 것으로 예상되나, 2022-2023년 내부통제 검토에서 확인된 중대한 약점은 일부 여전히 개선 중입니다.

Allied Gaming & Entertainment Inc. (AGAE) a publié un Schedule 14A préliminaire modifié concernant son assemblée générale annuelle virtuelle combinée 2024-2025. Six propositions seront présentées : (1) élection de trois administrateurs de classe B, (2) élection de trois administrateurs de classe C, (3) vote consultatif sur la rémunération 2023, (4) fréquence des futurs votes consultatifs sur la rémunération, et (5-6) ratification de ZH CPA, LLC en tant qu’auditeur indépendant pour les exercices 2024 et 2025.

Conflit de procuration. L’actionnaire activiste Knighted Pastures, LLC et ses affiliés, détenant environ 31,5 % des actions ordinaires en circulation, ont informé la société de leur intention de présenter une liste d’opposition composée de trois candidats de classe B et trois de classe C, ainsi que de demander la révocation de l’administrateur en poste Yangyang Li. Le conseil d’administration d’AGAE rejette tous les candidats de Knighted et a poursuivi Knighted en justice en vertu de la section 13(d), demandant au tribunal de district des États-Unis (C.D. Cal.) de déclarer invalide le second avis de Knighted et de bloquer la liste d’opposition jusqu’à ce que les dépôts appropriés du Schedule 13D soient effectués. Selon la décision du tribunal, les actionnaires pourraient devoir revoter avec une carte de procuration universelle incluant les candidats de Knighted.

Recommandations du conseil. La société encourage les investisseurs à voter « POUR » les six propositions de la direction, à n’utiliser que la carte de procuration BLANCHE et à s’abstenir de voter pour les candidats de Knighted s’ils apparaissent. Le conseil recommande également une fréquence triennale pour les futurs votes consultatifs sur la rémunération.

Litiges et coûts. La direction détaille deux actions en justice engagées par Knighted devant la Cour de chancellerie en 2024 (toutes deux largement sans objet) ainsi que le procès fédéral en cours intenté par la société le 11 juin 2025. Les dépenses supplémentaires estimées liées à la bataille de procuration s’élèvent à environ $ [•], incluant l’engagement de Mackenzie Partners comme solliciteur de procurations.

Structure de gouvernance. AGAE conserve un conseil d’administration échelonné (classes A/B/C). Si la liste de la société est élue, les mandats de la classe B courront jusqu’en 2027 et ceux de la classe C jusqu’en 2028. Le directeur financier actuel, Roy Anderson, a été nommé pour occuper un siège de classe C, en remplacement de l’administrateur sortant Yuanfei Qu.

Principales implications pour les investisseurs :

  • Risque potentiel de changement de contrôle si Knighted obtient quatre sièges ou plus.
  • Une incertitude à court terme concernant l’issue du tribunal et les mécanismes de procuration pourrait réduire la participation au vote et augmenter les coûts administratifs.
  • La continuité de l’auditeur est attendue jusqu’en 2025, mais des faiblesses importantes identifiées lors des examens du contrôle interne 2022-2023 restent partiellement en cours de remédiation.

Allied Gaming & Entertainment Inc. (AGAE) hat einen geänderten vorläufigen Schedule 14A veröffentlicht, der seine kombinierte virtuelle Hauptversammlung 2024-2025 abdeckt. Sechs Vorschläge werden vorgestellt: (1) Wahl von drei Direktoren der Klasse B, (2) Wahl von drei Direktoren der Klasse C, (3) 2023 Say-on-Pay, (4) Häufigkeit zukünftiger Say-on-Pay-Abstimmungen und (5-6) Bestätigung von ZH CPA, LLC als unabhängiger Prüfer für die Geschäftsjahre 2024 und 2025.

Proxy-Kampf. Der aktivistische Aktionär Knighted Pastures, LLC und verbundene Unternehmen, die etwa 31,5 % der ausstehenden Stammaktien halten, haben dem Unternehmen ihre Absicht mitgeteilt, eine Gegenliste mit drei Kandidaten für Klasse B und drei für Klasse C aufzustellen und die Abberufung des amtierenden Direktors Yangyang Li zu beantragen. Der AGAE-Vorstand lehnt alle Kandidaten von Knighted ab und hat Knighted gemäß Abschnitt 13(d) verklagt und das US-Bezirksgericht (C.D. Cal.) gebeten, die zweite Mitteilung von Knighted für ungültig zu erklären und die Gegenliste zu blockieren, bis ordnungsgemäße Schedule 13D-Einreichungen erfolgen. Abhängig vom Gerichtsurteil müssen die Aktionäre möglicherweise erneut über eine universelle Proxy-Karte abstimmen, die die Kandidaten von Knighted enthält.

Empfehlungen des Vorstands. Das Unternehmen fordert die Anleger auf, den sechs Vorschlägen des Managements „ZUZUSTIMMEN“, ausschließlich die WEISSE Proxy-Karte zu verwenden und bei Kandidaten von Knighted, falls diese erscheinen, ihre Stimmen zurückzuhalten. Der Vorstand empfiehlt außerdem eine dreijährige Frequenz für zukünftige Say-on-Pay-Abstimmungen.

Rechtsstreitigkeiten und Kostenangaben. Das Management beschreibt zwei im Jahr 2024 von Knighted eingeleitete Verfahren vor dem Chancery Court (beide weitgehend gegenstandslos) sowie die aktuelle Bundesklage, die das Unternehmen am 11. Juni 2025 eingereicht hat. Die geschätzten zusätzlichen Kosten für den Proxy-Kampf belaufen sich auf etwa $ [•], einschließlich der Beauftragung von Mackenzie Partners als Proxy-Beauftragte.

Governance-Struktur. AGAE behält einen gestaffelten (Klasse A/B/C) Vorstand bei. Sofern die Unternehmensliste gewählt wird, laufen die Amtszeiten der Klasse B bis 2027 und der Klasse C bis 2028. Der derzeitige Finanzvorstand Roy Anderson wurde nominiert, um einen Sitz der Klasse C zu besetzen und den ausscheidenden Direktor Yuanfei Qu zu ersetzen.

Wichtige Implikationen für Investoren:

  • Potentielles Kontrollwechselrisiko, falls Knighted vier oder mehr Sitze gewinnt.
  • Kurzfristige Unsicherheit bezüglich des Gerichtsurteils und der Proxy-Mechanik könnte die Wahlbeteiligung drücken und die Verwaltungskosten erhöhen.
  • Die Kontinuität des Abschlussprüfers wird bis 2025 erwartet, jedoch bestehen die in den internen Kontrollprüfungen 2022-2023 festgestellten wesentlichen Schwächen teilweise weiterhin.
Positive
  • None.
Negative
  • Proxy contest with 31.5 % holder Knighted threatens board control and may lead to significant strategic redirection if Knighted prevails.
  • Ongoing federal and state litigation introduces legal uncertainty and incremental costs, potentially weighing on near-term cash flow.
  • Complex voting mechanics (possible re-issuance of proxy cards) risk disenfranchisement or confusion among retail investors.
  • Material weaknesses in internal control—although partly remediated—signal lingering operational risk and higher audit scrutiny.

Insights

TL;DR: Contested election signals elevated governance risk; outcome hinges on court ruling over Knighted notice.

The filing highlights an intense fight for board control. Knighted already owns ~31.5 % and seeks a majority slate. If the court validates Knighted’s notice, shareholders will face a universal proxy card and the prospect of six outsider directors—effectively a control shift without a formal premium. The board’s litigation strategy adds legal overhang and cost; estimated proxy-solicitation and advisory fees run high (exact amounts TBD). While staggered classes offer some protection, replacing four of seven seats would still realign governance. The company’s recommendation of a triennial say-on-pay vote aligns with small-cap norms but is secondary to the control drama. Investors should track upcoming court decisions and gauge Knighted’s strategic agenda before taking a position.

TL;DR: Knighted’s 31.5 % stake makes this a credible takeover bid masked as a proxy fight.

Knighted has steadily accumulated stock since 2021, shifting from Schedule 13G to 13D and litigating to influence transactions. Its six-member slate plus removal proposal would tilt the board in its favor; if successful, strategic direction and capital allocation could pivot rapidly. Management’s resort to federal litigation and exclusion of Knighted nominees from the WHITE card suggest procedural leverage but risk alienating undecided holders. Absent superior operating performance metrics, incumbents may struggle to rally broader support. The contest is therefore impactful for valuation—control changes often precede divestitures or recapitalisations.

Allied Gaming & Entertainment Inc. (AGAE) ha pubblicato un emendamento preliminare al Schedule 14A relativo alla sua assemblea annuale virtuale combinata 2024-2025. Saranno presentate sei proposte: (1) elezione di tre amministratori di Classe B, (2) elezione di tre amministratori di Classe C, (3) voto consultivo sulla remunerazione 2023, (4) frequenza dei futuri voti consultivi sulla remunerazione, e (5-6) ratifica di ZH CPA, LLC come revisore indipendente per gli esercizi 2024 e 2025.

Contesa per il proxy. L’azionista attivista Knighted Pastures, LLC e affiliati, detentori di circa il 31,5% delle azioni ordinarie in circolazione, ha comunicato all’azienda l’intenzione di presentare una lista alternativa di tre candidati per la Classe B e tre per la Classe C, chiedendo inoltre la rimozione del direttore in carica Yangyang Li. Il consiglio di amministrazione di AGAE respinge tutti i candidati di Knighted e ha avviato una causa contro Knighted ai sensi della Sezione 13(d), chiedendo alla Corte Distrettuale degli Stati Uniti (C.D. Cal.) di dichiarare invalida la seconda comunicazione di Knighted e di bloccare la lista avversaria fino alla corretta presentazione dei moduli Schedule 13D. A seconda della decisione del tribunale, gli azionisti potrebbero dover votare nuovamente su una scheda proxy universale che includa i candidati di Knighted.

Raccomandazioni del consiglio. La società invita gli investitori a votare “A FAVORE” delle sei proposte della direzione, a utilizzare esclusivamente la scheda proxy BIANCA e a astenersi dal votare per i candidati di Knighted qualora comparissero. Il consiglio raccomanda inoltre una frequenza triennale per i futuri voti consultivi sulla remunerazione.

Contenziosi e costi. La direzione descrive due azioni legali avviate da Knighted presso la Corte di Cancelleria nel 2024 (entrambe in gran parte superate) e la causa federale attuale intentata dalla società l’11 giugno 2025. Le spese incrementali stimate per la contesa proxy sono circa $ [•], inclusi i costi per l’ingaggio di Mackenzie Partners come consulente per la raccolta dei proxy.

Struttura di governance. AGAE mantiene un consiglio con mandato scaglionato (Classi A/B/C). Se verrà eletta la lista della società, i mandati della Classe B dureranno fino al 2027 e quelli della Classe C fino al 2028. L’attuale Chief Financial Officer Roy Anderson è stato nominato per occupare un seggio di Classe C, in sostituzione del direttore uscente Yuanfei Qu.

Implicazioni chiave per gli investitori:

  • Rischio di cambiamento del controllo se Knighted ottiene quattro o più seggi.
  • Incertezza a breve termine sull’esito giudiziario e sulle modalità di voto potrebbe ridurre la partecipazione e aumentare i costi amministrativi.
  • La continuità del revisore è prevista fino al 2025, ma le debolezze significative individuate nelle revisioni interne 2022-2023 sono ancora in parte in fase di risoluzione.

Allied Gaming & Entertainment Inc. (AGAE) ha publicado un Schedule 14A preliminar enmendado referente a su junta anual virtual combinada 2024-2025. Se presentarán seis propuestas: (1) elección de tres directores Clase B, (2) elección de tres directores Clase C, (3) voto consultivo sobre remuneración 2023, (4) frecuencia de futuros votos consultivos sobre remuneración, y (5-6) ratificación de ZH CPA, LLC como auditor independiente para los ejercicios fiscales 2024 y 2025.

Contienda por el proxy. El accionista activista Knighted Pastures, LLC y afiliados, que poseen aproximadamente el 31,5 % de las acciones ordinarias en circulación, ha notificado a la empresa su intención de presentar una lista opositora con tres candidatos para la Clase B y tres para la Clase C, y buscar la remoción del director actual Yangyang Li. La junta de AGAE rechaza a todos los nominados de Knighted y ha demandado a Knighted bajo la Sección 13(d), solicitando al Tribunal de Distrito de EE.UU. (C.D. Cal.) que declare inválido el segundo aviso de Knighted y que bloquee la lista opositora hasta que se presenten correctamente los Schedule 13D. Según la decisión judicial, los accionistas podrían tener que votar nuevamente con una tarjeta proxy universal que incluya a los candidatos de Knighted.

Recomendaciones de la junta. La compañía insta a los inversores a votar “A FAVOR” de las seis propuestas de la administración, a usar únicamente la tarjeta proxy BLANCA y a abstenerse de votar por los nombres de Knighted si aparecen. La junta también recomienda una frecuencia trienal para futuros votos consultivos sobre remuneración.

Litigios y costos. La dirección detalla dos acciones en la Corte de Cancillería iniciadas por Knighted en 2024 (ambas mayormente irrelevantes) y la demanda federal actual presentada por la empresa el 11 de junio de 2025. Los gastos incrementales estimados por la contienda proxy suman aproximadamente $ [•], incluyendo la contratación de Mackenzie Partners como asesor de proxy.

Estructura de gobernanza. AGAE mantiene una junta escalonada (Clases A/B/C). Suponiendo que se elija la lista de la empresa, los mandatos de Clase B serán hasta 2027 y los de Clase C hasta 2028. El actual Director Financiero Roy Anderson ha sido nominado para ocupar un asiento de Clase C, en reemplazo del director saliente Yuanfei Qu.

Implicaciones clave para los inversores:

  • Riesgo potencial de cambio de control si Knighted obtiene cuatro o más escaños.
  • Incertidumbre a corto plazo sobre el resultado judicial y la mecánica del proxy podría disminuir la participación en la votación y aumentar los costos administrativos.
  • Se espera continuidad del auditor hasta 2025, pero las debilidades materiales identificadas en las revisiones de control interno 2022-2023 permanecen parcialmente en remediación.

Allied Gaming & Entertainment Inc.(AGAE)는 2024-2025년 통합 가상 연례 주주총회를 위한 수정된 예비 Schedule 14A를 공개했습니다. 총 6개의 안건이 상정됩니다: (1) 3명의 Class B 이사 선임, (2) 3명의 Class C 이사 선임, (3) 2023년 보수 승인 투표, (4) 향후 보수 승인 투표 빈도, (5-6) 2024년 및 2025년 회계연도 독립 감사인으로 ZH CPA, LLC 승인 건입니다.

대리투표 경쟁.31.5%의 보통주를 보유한 행동주의 주주 Knighted Pastures, LLC 및 계열사들은 회사에 Class B 후보 3명과 Class C 후보 3명으로 구성된 반대 명단을 제출하고 현 이사 Yangyang Li의 해임을 요구할 의사를 통보했습니다. AGAE 이사회는 Knighted의 모든 후보를 거부하며, 13(d)조에 따라 Knighted를 상대로 소송을 제기하여 미국 연방지방법원(C.D. Cal.)에 Knighted의 두 번째 통지를 무효로 선언하고 적절한 Schedule 13D 제출 전까지 반대 명단을 차단해 줄 것을 요청했습니다. 법원 판결에 따라 주주들은 Knighted 후보가 포함된 통합 대리투표용지로 재투표해야 할 수도 있습니다.

이사회 권고. 회사는 투자자들에게 6개 경영진 안건에 대해 “찬성” 투표하고 백색 대리투표용지만 사용할 것을 권장하며, Knighted 후보가 포함된 경우 해당 후보에 대해서는 기권할 것을 요청합니다. 또한 이사회는 향후 보수 승인 투표 빈도를 3년 주기로 권고합니다.

소송 및 비용 공개. 경영진은 2024년에 Knighted가 제기한 두 건의 챈서리 법원 소송(대부분 기각)과 2025년 6월 11일 회사가 제기한 현재 연방법원 소송에 대해 설명했습니다. 대리투표 분쟁에 따른 추가 비용은 약 $ [•]이며, 대리투표 대행사인 Mackenzie Partners 고용 비용도 포함됩니다.

지배구조 구조. AGAE는 단계별(Class A/B/C) 이사회 구조를 유지하고 있습니다. 회사 명단이 선출될 경우 Class B 임기는 2027년까지, Class C 임기는 2028년까지입니다. 현재 최고재무책임자(CFO) Roy Anderson은 퇴임하는 Yuanfei Qu 이사를 대신해 Class C 이사 후보로 지명되었습니다.

투자자에게 주요 시사점:

  • Knighted가 4석 이상 확보할 경우 경영권 변경 위험이 있습니다.
  • 법원 판결 및 대리투표 절차에 대한 단기 불확실성이 투표 참여율을 낮추고 행정 비용을 증가시킬 수 있습니다.
  • 감사인은 2025년까지 연속성을 유지할 것으로 예상되나, 2022-2023년 내부통제 검토에서 확인된 중대한 약점은 일부 여전히 개선 중입니다.

Allied Gaming & Entertainment Inc. (AGAE) a publié un Schedule 14A préliminaire modifié concernant son assemblée générale annuelle virtuelle combinée 2024-2025. Six propositions seront présentées : (1) élection de trois administrateurs de classe B, (2) élection de trois administrateurs de classe C, (3) vote consultatif sur la rémunération 2023, (4) fréquence des futurs votes consultatifs sur la rémunération, et (5-6) ratification de ZH CPA, LLC en tant qu’auditeur indépendant pour les exercices 2024 et 2025.

Conflit de procuration. L’actionnaire activiste Knighted Pastures, LLC et ses affiliés, détenant environ 31,5 % des actions ordinaires en circulation, ont informé la société de leur intention de présenter une liste d’opposition composée de trois candidats de classe B et trois de classe C, ainsi que de demander la révocation de l’administrateur en poste Yangyang Li. Le conseil d’administration d’AGAE rejette tous les candidats de Knighted et a poursuivi Knighted en justice en vertu de la section 13(d), demandant au tribunal de district des États-Unis (C.D. Cal.) de déclarer invalide le second avis de Knighted et de bloquer la liste d’opposition jusqu’à ce que les dépôts appropriés du Schedule 13D soient effectués. Selon la décision du tribunal, les actionnaires pourraient devoir revoter avec une carte de procuration universelle incluant les candidats de Knighted.

Recommandations du conseil. La société encourage les investisseurs à voter « POUR » les six propositions de la direction, à n’utiliser que la carte de procuration BLANCHE et à s’abstenir de voter pour les candidats de Knighted s’ils apparaissent. Le conseil recommande également une fréquence triennale pour les futurs votes consultatifs sur la rémunération.

Litiges et coûts. La direction détaille deux actions en justice engagées par Knighted devant la Cour de chancellerie en 2024 (toutes deux largement sans objet) ainsi que le procès fédéral en cours intenté par la société le 11 juin 2025. Les dépenses supplémentaires estimées liées à la bataille de procuration s’élèvent à environ $ [•], incluant l’engagement de Mackenzie Partners comme solliciteur de procurations.

Structure de gouvernance. AGAE conserve un conseil d’administration échelonné (classes A/B/C). Si la liste de la société est élue, les mandats de la classe B courront jusqu’en 2027 et ceux de la classe C jusqu’en 2028. Le directeur financier actuel, Roy Anderson, a été nommé pour occuper un siège de classe C, en remplacement de l’administrateur sortant Yuanfei Qu.

Principales implications pour les investisseurs :

  • Risque potentiel de changement de contrôle si Knighted obtient quatre sièges ou plus.
  • Une incertitude à court terme concernant l’issue du tribunal et les mécanismes de procuration pourrait réduire la participation au vote et augmenter les coûts administratifs.
  • La continuité de l’auditeur est attendue jusqu’en 2025, mais des faiblesses importantes identifiées lors des examens du contrôle interne 2022-2023 restent partiellement en cours de remédiation.

Allied Gaming & Entertainment Inc. (AGAE) hat einen geänderten vorläufigen Schedule 14A veröffentlicht, der seine kombinierte virtuelle Hauptversammlung 2024-2025 abdeckt. Sechs Vorschläge werden vorgestellt: (1) Wahl von drei Direktoren der Klasse B, (2) Wahl von drei Direktoren der Klasse C, (3) 2023 Say-on-Pay, (4) Häufigkeit zukünftiger Say-on-Pay-Abstimmungen und (5-6) Bestätigung von ZH CPA, LLC als unabhängiger Prüfer für die Geschäftsjahre 2024 und 2025.

Proxy-Kampf. Der aktivistische Aktionär Knighted Pastures, LLC und verbundene Unternehmen, die etwa 31,5 % der ausstehenden Stammaktien halten, haben dem Unternehmen ihre Absicht mitgeteilt, eine Gegenliste mit drei Kandidaten für Klasse B und drei für Klasse C aufzustellen und die Abberufung des amtierenden Direktors Yangyang Li zu beantragen. Der AGAE-Vorstand lehnt alle Kandidaten von Knighted ab und hat Knighted gemäß Abschnitt 13(d) verklagt und das US-Bezirksgericht (C.D. Cal.) gebeten, die zweite Mitteilung von Knighted für ungültig zu erklären und die Gegenliste zu blockieren, bis ordnungsgemäße Schedule 13D-Einreichungen erfolgen. Abhängig vom Gerichtsurteil müssen die Aktionäre möglicherweise erneut über eine universelle Proxy-Karte abstimmen, die die Kandidaten von Knighted enthält.

Empfehlungen des Vorstands. Das Unternehmen fordert die Anleger auf, den sechs Vorschlägen des Managements „ZUZUSTIMMEN“, ausschließlich die WEISSE Proxy-Karte zu verwenden und bei Kandidaten von Knighted, falls diese erscheinen, ihre Stimmen zurückzuhalten. Der Vorstand empfiehlt außerdem eine dreijährige Frequenz für zukünftige Say-on-Pay-Abstimmungen.

Rechtsstreitigkeiten und Kostenangaben. Das Management beschreibt zwei im Jahr 2024 von Knighted eingeleitete Verfahren vor dem Chancery Court (beide weitgehend gegenstandslos) sowie die aktuelle Bundesklage, die das Unternehmen am 11. Juni 2025 eingereicht hat. Die geschätzten zusätzlichen Kosten für den Proxy-Kampf belaufen sich auf etwa $ [•], einschließlich der Beauftragung von Mackenzie Partners als Proxy-Beauftragte.

Governance-Struktur. AGAE behält einen gestaffelten (Klasse A/B/C) Vorstand bei. Sofern die Unternehmensliste gewählt wird, laufen die Amtszeiten der Klasse B bis 2027 und der Klasse C bis 2028. Der derzeitige Finanzvorstand Roy Anderson wurde nominiert, um einen Sitz der Klasse C zu besetzen und den ausscheidenden Direktor Yuanfei Qu zu ersetzen.

Wichtige Implikationen für Investoren:

  • Potentielles Kontrollwechselrisiko, falls Knighted vier oder mehr Sitze gewinnt.
  • Kurzfristige Unsicherheit bezüglich des Gerichtsurteils und der Proxy-Mechanik könnte die Wahlbeteiligung drücken und die Verwaltungskosten erhöhen.
  • Die Kontinuität des Abschlussprüfers wird bis 2025 erwartet, jedoch bestehen die in den internen Kontrollprüfungen 2022-2023 festgestellten wesentlichen Schwächen teilweise weiterhin.

 

Registration Statement No.333-285508
Filed Pursuant to Rule 424(b)(2)


Pricing Supplement dated June 26, 2025 to the Prospectus dated March 25, 2025,
the Prospectus Supplement dated March 25, 2025 and the Product Supplement dated March 25, 2025

US$ 2,314,000
Senior Medium-Term Notes, Series K
Capped Barrier Enhanced Return Notes due September 01, 2026
Linked to the shares of the SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust

The notes are designed for investors who are seeking 200.00% leveraged positive return based on any appreciation in the level of the shares of the SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust (the “Reference Asset”), subject to the Maximum Redemption Amount (as defined below). Investors must be willing to accept that the payment at maturity will not exceed the Maximum Redemption Amount.

The Maximum Redemption Amount is $1,105.00 for each $1,000 in principal amount (a 10.50% return on the notes).

If the Reference Asset decreases by more than 20.00% from its Initial Level, investors will lose 1% of the principal amount for each 1% decrease in the level of the Reference Asset from its Initial Level to its Final Level. In such a case, you will receive a cash amount at maturity that is less than the principal amount, and may lose up to 100% of your principal amount at maturity.

Investing in the notes is not equivalent to a direct investment in the Reference Asset.

The notes do not bear interest. The notes will not be listed on any securities exchange.

All payments on the notes are subject to the credit risk of Bank of Montreal.

The notes will be issued in minimum denominations of $1,000 and integral multiples of $1,000.

The CUSIP number of the notes is 06376ELV2.

Our subsidiary, BMO Capital Markets Corp. (“BMOCM”), is the agent for this offering. See “Supplemental Plan of Distribution (Conflicts of Interest)” below.

The notes will not be subject to conversion into our common shares or the common shares of any of our affiliates under subsection 39.2(2.3) of the Canada Deposit Insurance Corporation Act (the “CDIC Act”).

Terms of the Notes:

Pricing Date:

June 26, 2025

 

Valuation Date:

August 27, 2026

Settlement Date:

July 01, 2025

 

Maturity Date:

September 01, 2026

 

Price to Public1

Agent’s Commission1

Proceeds to Bank of Montreal1

Per Note

Total

100%

$2,314,000.00

2.00%

$46,280.00

98.00%

$2,267,720.00

1 The total “Agent’s Commission” and “Proceeds to Bank of Montreal” specified above reflect the aggregate amounts at the time Bank of Montreal established its hedge positions on or prior to the Pricing Date, which may have been variable and fluctuated depending on market conditions at such times. Certain dealers who purchased the notes for sale to certain fee-based advisory accounts may have foregone some or all of their selling concessions, fees or commissions. The public offering price for investors purchasing the notes in these accounts was between $980.00 and $1,000 per $1,000 in principal amount.

Investing in the notes involves risks, including those described in the “Selected Risk Considerations” section beginning on page P-5 hereof, the “Additional Risk Factors Relating to the Notes” section beginning on page PS-5 of the product supplement, and the “Risk Factors” section beginning on page S-1 of the prospectus supplement and on page 8 of the prospectus.

Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved of these notes or passed upon the accuracy of this document, the product supplement, the prospectus supplement or the prospectus. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense. The notes will be our unsecured obligations and will not be savings accounts or deposits that are insured by the United States Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the Deposit Insurance Fund, the Canada Deposit Insurance Corporation or any other governmental agency or instrumentality or other entity.

On the date hereof, based on the terms set forth above, the estimated initial value of the notes is $970.67 per $1,000 in principal amount. However, as discussed in more detail below, the actual value of the notes at any time will reflect many factors and cannot be predicted with accuracy.

BMO CAPITAL MARKETS

Key Terms of the Notes:

Reference Asset:

The shares of the SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust (ticker symbol "SPY"). See "The Reference Asset" below for additional information.

Underlying Index:

The S&P 500® Index

Payment at Maturity:

If the Final Level of the Reference Asset is greater than its Initial Level and the Percentage Change of the Reference Asset multiplied by the Upside Leverage Factor is greater than or equal to the Maximum Return, the payment at maturity for each $1,000 in principal amount of the notes will equal the Maximum Redemption Amount.

If the Final Level of the Reference Asset is greater than or equal to its Initial Level and the Percentage Change of the Reference Asset multiplied by the Upside Leverage Factor is less than the Maximum Return, then the amount that investors will receive at maturity for each $1,000 in principal amount of the notes will equal:

$1,000 + ($1,000 x Percentage Change of the Reference Asset x Upside Leverage Factor)

If the Final Level of the Reference Asset is less than its Initial Level, but is not less than its Barrier Level, then investors will, for each $1,000 in principal amount of the notes, receive the principal amount of $1,000 and no additional return.

If the Final Level of the Reference Asset is less than its Barrier Level, then the amount that investors will receive at maturity for each $1,000 in principal amount of the notes will equal:

$1,000 + ($1,000 x Percentage Change of the Reference Asset)

In this case, investors will lose 1% of their principal for each 1% that the Final Level of the Reference Asset declines from its Initial Level. You may lose all of the principal amount of your notes.

Upside Leverage Factor:

200.00%

Maximum Return:

10.50%

Maximum Redemption Amount:

The payment at maturity will not exceed the Maximum Redemption Amount of $1,105.00 per $1,000 in principal amount of the notes.

Percentage Change:

The quotient, expressed as a percentage, of the following formula:

(Final Level - Initial Level )
Initial Level

Initial Level:2

$611.87, which was the closing level of the Reference Asset on the Pricing Date.

Barrier Level:2

$489.50, which is 80.00% of the Initial Level (rounded to two decimal places).

Final Level:

The closing level of the Reference Asset on the Valuation Date.

Pricing Date:

June 26, 2025

Settlement Date:

July 01, 2025

Valuation Date:1

August 27, 2026

Maturity Date:1

September 01, 2026

Physical Delivery Amount:

We will only pay cash on the Maturity Date, and you will have no right to receive any shares of the Reference Asset.

Calculation Agent:

BMOCM

Selling Agent:

BMOCM

1 Subject to the occurrence of a market disruption event, as described in the accompanying product supplement.

2

 

2As determined by the calculation agent and subject to adjustment in certain circumstances. See "General Terms of the Notes — Anti-dilution Adjustments to a Reference Asset that is an Equity Security (Including Any ETF)" and "— Adjustments to an ETF" in the product supplement for additional information.

3

 

Payoff Example

The following table shows the hypothetical payout profile of an investment in the notes based on various hypothetical Final Levels (and the corresponding Percentage Change) of the Reference Asset, reflecting the 200.00% Upside Leverage Factor, Maximum Return of 10.50% and Barrier Level of 80.00% of the Initial Level. Please see “Examples of the Hypothetical Payment at Maturity for a $1,000 Investment in the Notes” below for more detailed examples.

Hypothetical Percentage Change of the Reference Asset

Participation in Percentage Change

Hypothetical Return of the Notes

7.75%

 

5.25%

200% Upside Exposure, subject to the Maximum Return

 

10.50%

 

10.50%

4.00%

 

2.00%

200% Upside Exposure

 

8.00%

 

4.00%

-10%

 

-20%

Barrier Level of 80% of Initial Level

 

0%

 

0%

-30%

 

-40%

1x Loss Beyond Barrier Level

 

-30%

 

-40%

4

 

Additional Terms of the Notes

You should read this document together with the product supplement dated March 25, 2025, the prospectus supplement dated March 25, 2025 and the prospectus dated March 25, 2025. This document, together with the documents listed below, contains the terms of the notes and supersedes all other prior or contemporaneous oral statements as well as any other written materials including preliminary or indicative pricing terms, correspondence, trade ideas, structures for implementation, sample structures, fact sheets, brochures or other educational materials of ours or the agent. You should carefully consider, among other things, the matters set forth in Additional Risk Factors Relating to the Notes in the product supplement, as the notes involve risks not associated with conventional debt securities. We urge you to consult your investment, legal, tax, accounting and other advisers before you invest in the notes.

You may access these documents on the SEC website at www.sec.gov as follows (or if such address has changed, by reviewing our filings for the relevant date on the SEC website):

Product supplement dated March 25, 2025:
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/927971/000121465925004741/g324250424b2.htm

Prospectus supplement dated March 25, 2025 and prospectus dated March 25, 2025:
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/927971/000119312525062081/d840917d424b5.htm

Our Central Index Key, or CIK, on the SEC website is 927971. As used in this document, "we", "us" or "our" refers to Bank of Montreal.

5

 

Selected Risk Considerations

An investment in the notes involves significant risks. Investing in the notes is not equivalent to investing directly in the Reference Asset. These risks are explained in more detail in the “Additional Risk Factors Relating to the Notes” section of the product supplement.

Risks Related to the Structure or Features of the Notes

Your investment in the notes may result in a loss. — The notes do not guarantee any return of principal. If the Final Level is less than its Barrier Level, you will lose 1% of the principal amount for each 1% that the Final Level is less than the Initial Level. In such a case, you will receive at maturity a cash payment that is less than the principal amount of the notes and may be zero. Accordingly, you could lose your entire investment in the notes.

Your return on the notes is limited to the Maximum Redemption Amount, regardless of any appreciation in the levels of the Reference Asset. — The return on your notes will not be greater than the Maximum Redemption Amount. This will be the case even if the Percentage Change of the Reference Asset multiplied by the Upside Leverage Factor exceeds the Maximum Return.

Your return on the notes may be lower than the return on a conventional debt security of comparable maturity. — The return that you will receive on your notes, which could be negative, may be less than the return you could earn on other investments. The notes do not provide for interest payments and the payment you receive at maturity, if any, may be less than the principal amount of the notes. Even if your return on the notes is positive, your return may be less than the return you would earn if you bought a conventional senior interest bearing debt security of ours with the same maturity or if you invested directly in the Reference Asset. Your investment may not reflect the full opportunity cost to you when you take into account factors that affect the time value of money.

Risks Related to the Reference Asset

Owning the notes is not the same as owning shares of the Reference Asset or a security directly linked to the Reference Asset. — The return on your notes will not reflect the return you would realize if you actually owned shares of the Reference Asset or a security directly linked to the performance of the Reference Asset and held that investment for a similar period. Your notes may trade quite differently from the Reference Asset. Changes in the level of the Reference Asset may not result in comparable changes in the market value of your notes. Even if the level of the Reference Asset increases during the term of the notes, the market value of the notes prior to maturity may not increase to the same extent. It is also possible for the market value of the notes to decrease while the level of the Reference Asset increases. In addition, any dividends or other distributions paid on the Reference Asset will not be reflected in the amount payable on the notes.

You will not have any shareholder rights and will have no right to receive any shares of the Reference Asset (or any company included in the Reference Asset) at maturity. — Investing in your notes will not make you a holder of any shares of the Reference Asset or any securities held by the Reference Asset. Neither you nor any other holder or owner of the notes will have any voting rights, any right to receive dividends or other distributions, or any other rights with respect to the Reference Asset or such underlying securities.

No delivery of shares of the Reference Asset. — The notes will be payable only in cash. You should not invest in the notes if you seek to have the shares of the Reference Asset delivered to you at maturity.

Changes that affect the applicable Underlying Index will affect the market value of the notes and the amount you will receive at maturity. — The policies of the applicable index sponsor concerning the calculation of the applicable Underlying Index, additions, deletions or substitutions of the components of the applicable Underlying Index and the manner in which changes affecting those components, such as stock dividends, reorganizations or mergers, may be reflected in the applicable Reference Asset and, therefore, could affect the share price of the Reference Asset, the amounts payable on the notes, and the market value of the notes prior to maturity. The amount payable on the notes and their market value could also be affected if the applicable index sponsor changes these policies, for example, by changing the manner in which it calculates the applicable Underlying Index, or if the applicable index sponsor discontinues or suspends the calculation or publication of the applicable Underlying Index.

We have no affiliation with the index sponsor of the applicable Underlying Index and will not be responsible for its actions. — The sponsor of the applicable Underlying Index is not our affiliate and will not be involved in the offering of the notes in any way. Consequently, we have no control over the actions of the index sponsor of the applicable Underlying Index, including any actions of the type that would require the calculation agent to adjust the payment to you at maturity. The index sponsors have no obligation of any sort with respect to the notes. Thus, the applicable index sponsor has no obligation to take your interests into consideration for any reason, including in taking any actions that might affect the value of the notes. None of our proceeds from the issuance of the notes will be delivered to the index sponsor of the applicable Underlying Index.

Adjustments to the Reference Asset could adversely affect the notes. — The sponsor and advisor of the Reference Asset is responsible for calculating and maintaining the Reference Asset. The sponsor and advisor of the Reference Asset can add, delete or substitute the stocks comprising the Reference Asset or make other methodological changes that could change the share price of the Reference Asset at any time. If one or more of these events occurs, the calculation of the amount payable at maturity may be adjusted to reflect such event or events. Consequently, any of these actions could adversely affect the amount payable at maturity and/or the market value of the notes.

We and our affiliates do not have any affiliation with the applicable investment advisor or the Reference Asset Issuer and are not responsible for their public disclosure of information. — The investment advisor of the Reference Asset advises the issuer of the Reference Asset (the “Reference Asset Issuer” ) on various matters, including matters relating to the policies, maintenance and calculation of the Reference Asset. We and our affiliates are not affiliated with the applicable investment advisor or the Reference Asset Issuer in any way and have no ability to control or predict its actions, including any errors in or discontinuance of disclosure regarding the methods or policies relating to the Reference Asset. Neither the applicable investment advisor nor the Reference Asset Issuer is involved in the offerings of the notes in any way and has no obligation to consider your interests as an owner of the notes in taking any actions relating to the Reference Asset that might affect the value of the notes. Neither we nor any of our affiliates has independently verified the adequacy or accuracy of the information about the applicable investment advisor or the Reference Asset contained in any public disclosure of information. You, as an investor in the notes, should make your own investigation into the Reference Asset Issuer.

6

 

The correlation between the performance of the Reference Asset and the performance of the applicable Underlying Index may be imperfect. — The performance of the Reference Asset is linked principally to the performance of the applicable Underlying Index. However, because of the potential discrepancies identified in more detail in the product supplement, the return on the Reference Asset may correlate imperfectly with the return on the applicable Underlying Index.

The Reference Asset is subject to management risks. — The Reference Asset is subject to management risk, which is the risk that the applicable investment advisor’s investment strategy, the implementation of which is subject to a number of constraints, may not produce the intended results. For example, the applicable investment advisor may invest a portion of the Reference Asset Issuer’s assets in securities not included in the relevant industry or sector but which the applicable investment advisor believes will help the Reference Asset track the relevant industry or sector.

You must rely on your own evaluation of the merits of an investment linked to the Reference Asset. — In the ordinary course of their businesses, our affiliates from time to time may express views on expected movements in the prices of the Reference Asset or the prices of the securities held by the Reference Asset. One or more of our affiliates have published, and in the future may publish, research reports that express views on the Reference Asset or these securities. However, these views are subject to change from time to time. Moreover, other professionals who deal in the markets relating to the Reference Asset at any time may have significantly different views from those of our affiliates. You are encouraged to derive information concerning the Reference Asset from multiple sources, and you should not rely on the views expressed by our affiliates.
Neither the offering of the notes nor any views which our affiliates from time to time may express in the ordinary course of their businesses constitutes a recommendation as to the merits of an investment in the notes.

General Risk Factors

Your investment is subject to the credit risk of Bank of Montreal. — Our credit ratings and credit spreads may adversely affect the market value of the notes. Investors are dependent on our ability to pay any amounts due on the notes, and therefore investors are subject to our credit risk and to changes in the market’s view of our creditworthiness. Any decline in our credit ratings or increase in the credit spreads charged by the market for taking our credit risk is likely to adversely affect the value of the notes.

Potential conflicts. — We and our affiliates play a variety of roles in connection with the issuance of the notes, including acting as calculation agent. In performing these duties, the economic interests of the calculation agent and other affiliates of ours are potentially adverse to your interests as an investor in the notes. We or one or more of our affiliates may also engage in trading of shares of the Reference Asset on a regular basis as part of our general broker-dealer and other businesses, for proprietary accounts, for other accounts under management or to facilitate transactions for our customers. Any of these activities could adversely affect the level of the Reference Asset and, therefore, the market value of, and the payments on, the notes. We or one or more of our affiliates may also issue or underwrite other securities or financial or derivative instruments with returns linked or related to changes in the performance of the Reference Asset. By introducing competing products into the marketplace in this manner, we or one or more of our affiliates could adversely affect the market value of the notes.

Our initial estimated value of the notes is lower than the price to public. — Our initial estimated value of the notes is only an estimate, and is based on a number of factors. The price to public of the notes exceeds our initial estimated value, because costs associated with offering, structuring and hedging the notes are included in the price to public, but are not included in the estimated value. These costs include any underwriting discount and selling concessions, the profits that we and our affiliates expect to realize for assuming the risks in hedging our obligations under the notes and the estimated cost of hedging these obligations.

Our initial estimated value does not represent any future value of the notes, and may also differ from the estimated value of any other party. — Our initial estimated value of the notes as of the date hereof is derived using our internal pricing models. This value is based on market conditions and other relevant factors, which include volatility of the Reference Asset, dividend rates and interest rates. Different pricing models and assumptions could provide values for the notes that are greater than or less than our initial estimated value. In addition, market conditions and other relevant factors after the Pricing Date are expected to change, possibly rapidly, and our assumptions may prove to be incorrect. After the Pricing Date, the value of the notes could change dramatically due to changes in market conditions, our creditworthiness, and the other factors set forth herein and in the product supplement. These changes are likely to impact the price, if any, at which we or BMOCM would be willing to purchase the notes from you in any secondary market transactions. Our initial estimated value does not represent a minimum price at which we or our affiliates would be willing to buy your notes in any secondary market at any time.

The terms of the notes were not determined by reference to the credit spreads for our conventional fixed-rate debt. — To determine the terms of the notes, we used an internal funding rate that represents a discount from the credit spreads for our conventional fixed-rate debt. As a result, the terms of the notes are less favorable to you than if we had used a higher funding rate.

Certain costs are likely to adversely affect the value of the notes. — Absent any changes in market conditions, any secondary market prices of the notes will likely be lower than the price to public. This is because any secondary market prices will likely take into account our then-current market credit spreads, and because any secondary market prices are likely to exclude all or a portion of any underwriting discount and selling concessions, and the hedging profits and estimated hedging costs that are included in the price to public of the notes and that may be reflected on your account statements. In addition, any such price is also likely to reflect a discount to account for costs associated with establishing or unwinding any related hedge transaction, such as dealer discounts, mark-ups and other transaction costs. As a result, the price, if any, at which BMOCM or any other party may be willing to purchase the notes from you in secondary market transactions, if at all, will likely be lower than the price to public. Any sale that you make prior to the Maturity Date could result in a substantial loss to you.

Lack of liquidity. — The notes will not be listed on any securities exchange. BMOCM may offer to purchase the notes in the secondary market, but is not required to do so. Even if there is a secondary market, it may not provide enough liquidity to allow you to trade or sell the notes easily. Because other dealers are not likely to make a secondary market for the notes, the price at which you may be able to trade the notes is likely to depend on the price, if any, at which BMOCM is willing to buy the notes.

Hedging and trading activities. — We or any of our affiliates have carried out or may carry out hedging activities related to the notes, including purchasing or selling shares of the Reference Asset or securities held by the Reference Asset, futures or options relating to the Reference Asset or securities held by the Reference Asset or other derivative instruments with returns linked or related to changes in the performance on the Reference Asset or securities held by the Reference Asset. We or our affiliates may also trade in the Reference Asset, such

7

 

securities, or instruments related to the Reference Asset or such securities from time to time. Any of these hedging or trading activities on or prior to the Pricing Date and during the term of the notes could adversely affect the payments on the notes.

Many economic and market factors will influence the value of the notes. — In addition to the level of the Reference Asset and interest rates on any trading day, the value of the notes will be affected by a number of economic and market factors that may either offset or magnify each other, and which are described in more detail in the product supplement.

Significant aspects of the tax treatment of the notes are uncertain. — The tax treatment of the notes is uncertain. We do not plan to request a ruling from the Internal Revenue Service or from any Canadian authorities regarding the tax treatment of the notes, and the Internal Revenue Service or a court may not agree with the tax treatment described herein.
The Internal Revenue Service has released a notice that may affect the taxation of holders of “prepaid forward contracts” and similar instruments. According to the notice, the Internal Revenue Service and the U.S. Treasury are actively considering whether the holder of such instruments should be required to accrue ordinary income on a current basis. While it is not clear whether the notes would be viewed as similar to such instruments, it is possible that any future guidance could materially and adversely affect the tax consequences of an investment in the notes, possibly with retroactive effect.
Please read carefully the section entitled "U.S. Federal Tax Information" herein, the section entitled "Supplemental Tax Considerations–Supplemental U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations" in the accompanying product supplement, the section entitled "United States Federal Income Taxation" in the accompanying prospectus and the section entitled "Certain Income Tax Consequences" in the accompanying prospectus supplement. You should consult your tax advisor about your own tax situation.

8

 

Examples of the Hypothetical Payment at Maturity for a $1,000 Investment in the Notes

The following table illustrates the hypothetical payments on a note at maturity. The hypothetical payments are based on a $1,000 investment in the note, a hypothetical Initial Level of $100.00, a hypothetical Upside Leverage Factor of 200.00%, a hypothetical Barrier Level of $80.00 (80.00% of the hypothetical Initial Level), the Maximum Return of 10.50%, the Maximum Redemption Amount of $1,105.00, and a range of hypothetical Final Levels and the effect on the payment at maturity.

The hypothetical examples shown below are intended to help you understand the terms of the notes. The actual cash amount that you will receive at maturity will depend upon the Final Level of the Reference Asset. You may lose some or all of the principal amount at maturity.

 

Hypothetical Final Level

Hypothetical Final Level Expressed as a Percentage of the Initial Level

Hypothetical Payment at Maturity

Hypothetical Return on the Notes

$200.00

200.00%

$1,105.00

10.50%

$180.00

180.00%

$1,105.00

10.50%

$160.00

160.00%

$1,105.00

10.50%

$140.00

140.00%

$1,105.00

10.50%

$120.00

120.00%

$1,105.00

10.50%

$105.25

105.25%

$1,105.00

10.50%

$105.00

105.00%

$1,100.00

10.00%

$100.00

100.00%

$1,000.00

0.00%

$90.00

90.00%

$1,000.00

0.00%

$80.00

80.00%

$1,000.00

0.00%

$79.99

79.99%

$799.90

-20.01%

$60.00

60.00%

$600.00

-40.00%

$40.00

40.00%

$400.00

-60.00%

$20.00

20.00%

$200.00

-80.00%

$0.00

0.00%

$0.00

-100.00%

The following examples illustrate how the returns set forth in the table above are calculated.

Example 1: The level of the Reference Asset decreases from the hypothetical Initial Level of $100.00 to a hypothetical Final Level of $60.00, representing a Percentage Change of –40.00%. Because the Percentage Change of the Reference Asset is negative and its hypothetical Final Level is less than its Barrier Level, the investor receives a payment at maturity of $600.00 per $1,000 in principal amount of the notes, calculated as follows:

$1,000 + ($1,000 x -40.00%) = $600.00

Example 2: The level of the Reference Asset decreases from the hypothetical Initial Level of $100.00 to a hypothetical Final Level of $90.00, representing a Percentage Change of -10.00%. Although the Percentage Change of the Reference Asset is negative, because its hypothetical Final Level is greater than its Barrier Level, the investor receives a payment at maturity equal to the principal amount of the notes.

Example 3: The level of the Reference Asset increases from the hypothetical Initial Level of $100.00 to a hypothetical Final Level of $105.00, representing a Percentage Change of 5.00%. Because the hypothetical Final Level of the Reference Asset is greater than its hypothetical Initial Level and the Percentage Change multiplied by the Upside Leverage Factor does not exceed the Maximum Return, the investor receives a payment at maturity of $1,100.00 per $1,000 in principal amount of the notes, calculated as follows:

$1,000 + $1,000 x (5.00% x 200.00%) = $1,100.00

Example 4: The level of the Reference Asset increases from the hypothetical Initial Level of $100.00 to a hypothetical Final Level of $120.00, representing a Percentage Change of 20.00%. Because the hypothetical Final Level of the Reference Asset is greater than its hypothetical Initial Level, and the Percentage Change multiplied by the Upside Leverage Factor exceeds the Maximum Return, the investor receives a payment at maturity of $1,105.00 per $1,000 in principal amount of the notes (the Maximum Redemption Amount). The return on the notes in this example is less than the Percentage Change of the Reference Asset.

9

 

U.S. Federal Tax Information

By purchasing the notes, each holder agrees (in the absence of a change in law, an administrative determination or a judicial ruling to the contrary) to treat each note as a pre-paid derivative contract for U.S. federal income tax purposes. In the opinion of our counsel, Mayer Brown LLP, it would generally be reasonable to treat the notes as pre-paid derivative contracts in respect of the Reference Asset for U.S. federal income tax purposes. However, the U.S. federal income tax consequences of your investment in the notes are uncertain and the Internal Revenue Service could assert that the notes should be taxed in a manner that is different from that described in the preceding sentence. Please see the discussion in the product supplement dated March 25, 2025 under “Supplemental Tax Considerations—Supplemental U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations—Notes Treated as Pre-Paid Derivative Contracts,” which applies to the notes.

10

 

Supplemental Plan of Distribution (Conflicts of Interest)

 BMOCM will purchase the notes from us at a purchase price reflecting the commission set forth on the cover hereof. BMOCM has informed us that, as part of its distribution of the notes, it will reoffer the notes to other dealers who will sell them. Each such dealer, or each additional dealer engaged by a dealer to whom BMOCM reoffers the notes, will receive a commission from BMOCM, which will not exceed the commission set forth on the cover page.  

 Certain dealers who purchase the notes for sale to certain fee-based advisory accounts may forego some or all of their selling concessions, fees or commissions. The public offering price for investors purchasing the notes in these accounts may be less than 100% of the principal amount, as set forth on the cover page of this document. Investors that hold their notes in these accounts may be charged fees by the investment advisor or manager of that account based on the amount of assets held in those accounts, including the notes. 

We will deliver the notes on a date that is greater than one business day following the pricing date. Under Rule 15c6-1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), trades in the secondary market generally are required to settle in one business day, unless the parties to any such trade expressly agree otherwise. Accordingly, purchasers who wish to trade the notes more than one business day prior to the issue date will be required to specify alternative settlement arrangements to prevent a failed settlement. 

 We own, directly or indirectly, all of the outstanding equity securities of BMOCM, the agent for this offering. In accordance with FINRA Rule 5121, BMOCM may not make sales in this offering to any of its discretionary accounts without the prior written approval of the customer. 

 You should not construe the offering of the notes as a recommendation of the merits of acquiring an investment linked to the Reference Asset or as to the suitability of an investment in the notes. 

 BMOCM may, but is not obligated to, make a market in the notes. BMOCM will determine any secondary market prices that it is prepared to offer in its sole discretion. 

We may use this pricing supplement in the initial sale of the notes. In addition, BMOCM or another of our affiliates may use this pricing supplement in market-making transactions in any notes after their initial sale. Unless BMOCM or we inform you otherwise in the confirmation of sale, this pricing supplement is being used by BMOCM in a market-making transaction.

 For a period of approximately three months following issuance of the notes, the price, if any, at which we or our affiliates would be willing to buy the notes from investors, and the value that BMOCM may also publish for the notes through one or more financial information vendors and which could be indicated for the notes on any brokerage account statements, will reflect a temporary upward adjustment from our estimated value of the notes that would otherwise be determined and applicable at that time. This temporary upward adjustment represents a portion of (a) the hedging profit that we or our affiliates expect to realize over the term of the notes and (b) any underwriting discount and the selling concessions paid in connection with this offering. The amount of this temporary upward adjustment will decline to zero on a straight-line basis over the three-month period. 

The notes and the related offer to purchase notes and sale of notes under the terms and conditions provided herein do not constitute a public offering in any non-U.S. jurisdiction, and are being made available only to individually identified investors pursuant to a private offering as permitted in the relevant jurisdiction. The notes are not, and will not be, registered with any securities exchange or registry located outside of the United States and have not been registered with any non-U.S. securities or banking regulatory authority. The contents of this document have not been reviewed or approved by any non-U.S. securities or banking regulatory authority. Any person who wishes to acquire the notes from outside the United States should seek the advice or legal counsel as to the relevant requirements to acquire these notes.

British Virgin Islands. The notes have not been, and will not be, registered under the laws and regulations of the British Virgin Islands, nor has any regulatory authority in the British Virgin Islands passed comment upon or approved the accuracy or adequacy of this document. This pricing supplement and the related documents shall not constitute an offer, invitation or solicitation to any member of the public in the British Virgin Islands for the purposes of the Securities and Investment Business Act, 2010, of the British Virgin Islands.

Cayman Islands. Pursuant to the Companies Law (as amended) of the Cayman Islands, no invitation may be made to the public in the Cayman Islands to subscribe for the notes by or on behalf of the issuer unless at the time of such invitation the issuer is listed on the Cayman Islands Stock Exchange. The issuer is not presently listed on the Cayman Islands Stock Exchange and, accordingly, no invitation to the public in the Cayman Islands is to be made by the issuer (or by any dealer on its behalf). No such invitation is made to the public in the Cayman Islands hereby.

Dominican Republic. Nothing in this pricing supplement constitutes an offer of securities for sale in the Dominican Republic. The notes have not been, and will not be, registered with the Superintendence of Securities Market of the Dominican Republic (Superintendencia del Mercado de Valores), under Dominican Securities Market Law No. 249-17 (“Securities Law 249-17”), and the notes may not be offered or sold within the Dominican Republic or to, or for the account or benefit of, Dominican persons (as defined under Securities Law 249-17 and its regulations). Failure to comply with these directives may result in a violation of Securities Law 249-17 and its regulations.

Israel. This pricing supplement is intended solely for investors listed in the First Supplement of the Israeli Securities Law of 1968, as amended. A prospectus has not been prepared or filed, and will not be prepared or filed, in Israel relating to the notes offered hereunder. The notes cannot be resold in Israel other than to investors listed in the First Supplement of the Israeli Securities Law of 1968, as amended.

No action will be taken in Israel that would permit an offering of the notes or the distribution of any offering document or any other material to the public in Israel. In particular, no offering document or other material has been reviewed or approved by the Israel Securities

11

 

Authority. Any material provided to an offeree in Israel may not be reproduced or used for any other purpose, nor be furnished to any other person other than those to whom copies have been provided directly by us or the selling agents.

Nothing in this pricing supplement or any other offering material relating to the notes, should be considered as the rendering of a recommendation or advice, including investment advice or investment marketing under the Law For Regulation of Investment Advice, Investment Marketing and Investment Portfolio Management, 1995, to purchase any note. The purchase of any note will be based on an investor’s own understanding, for the investor’s own benefit and for the investor’s own account and not with the aim or intention of distributing or offering to other parties. In purchasing the notes, each investor declares that it has the knowledge, expertise and experience in financial and business matters so as to be capable of evaluating the risks and merits of an investment in the notes, without relying on any of the materials provided.

Mexico. The notes have not been registered with the National Registry of Securities maintained by the Mexican National Banking and Securities Commission and may not be offered or sold publicly in Mexico. This pricing supplement and the related documents may not be publicly distributed in Mexico. The notes may only be offered in a private offering pursuant to Article 8 of the Securities Market Law.

Switzerland. This pricing supplement is not intended to constitute an offer or solicitation to purchase or invest in any notes. Neither this pricing supplement nor any other offering or marketing material relating to the notes constitutes a prospectus compliant with the requirements of articles 35 et seq. of the Swiss Financial Services Act ("FinSA")) for a public offering of the notes in Switzerland and no such prospectus has been or will be prepared for or in connection with the offering of the notes in Switzerland.

Neither this pricing supplement nor any other offering or marketing material relating to the notes has been or will be filed with or approved by a Swiss review body (Prüfstelle). No application has been or is intended to be made to admit the notes to trading on any trading venue (SIX Swiss Exchange or on any other exchange or any multilateral trading facility) in Switzerland. Neither this pricing supplement nor any other offering or marketing material relating to the notes may be publicly distributed or otherwise made publicly available in Switzerland.

The notes may not be publicly offered, directly or indirectly, in Switzerland within the meaning of FinSA except (i) in any circumstances falling within the exemptions to prepare a prospectus listed in article 36 para. 1 FinSA or (ii) where such offer does not qualify as a public offer in Switzerland, provided always that no offer of notes shall require the Issuer or any offeror to publish a prospectus pursuant to article 35 FinSA in respect to such offer and that such offer shall comply with the additional restrictions set out below (if applicable). The Issuer has not authorised and does not authorise any offer of notes which would require the Issuer or any offeror to publish a prospectus pursuant to article 35 FinSA in respect of such offer. For purposes of this provision "public offer" shall have the meaning as such term is understood pursuant to article 3 lit. g and h FinSA and the Swiss Financial Services Ordinance ("FinSO").

The notes do not constitute participations in a collective investment scheme within the meaning of the Swiss Collective Investment Schemes Act. They are not subject to the approval of, or supervision by, the Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority ("FINMA"), and investors in the notes will not benefit from protection under CISA or supervision by FINMA.

Prohibition of Offer to Private Clients in Switzerland - No Key Information Document pursuant to article 58 FinSA (Basisinformationsblatt für Finanzinstrumente) or equivalent document under foreign law pursuant to article 59 para. 2 FinSA has been or will be prepared in relation to the notes. Therefore, the following additional restriction applies: Notes qualifying as "debt securities with a derivative character" pursuant to article 86 para. 2 FinSO may not be offered within the meaning of article 58 para. 1 FinSA, and neither this pricing supplement nor any other offering or marketing material relating to such notes may be made available, to any retail client (Privatkunde) within the meaning of FinSA in Switzerland.

The notes may also be sold in the following jurisdictions, provided, in each case, any sales are made in accordance with all applicable laws in such jurisdiction:

Barbados

Bermuda

12

 

Additional Information Relating to the Estimated Initial Value of the Notes

 Our estimated initial value of the notes on the date hereof that is set forth on the cover hereof, equals the sum of the values of the following hypothetical components:

a fixed-income debt component with the same tenor as the notes, valued using our internal funding rate for structured notes; and 

one or more derivative transactions relating to the economic terms of the notes. 

 The internal funding rate used in the determination of the initial estimated value generally represents a discount from the credit spreads for our conventional fixed-rate debt. The value of these derivative transactions is derived from our internal pricing models. These models are based on factors such as the traded market prices of comparable derivative instruments and on other inputs, which include volatility, dividend rates, interest rates and other factors. As a result, the estimated initial value of the notes on the Pricing Date was determined based on the market conditions on the Pricing Date. 

13

 

The Reference Asset

We have derived the following information from publicly available documents. We have not independently verified the accuracy or completeness of the following information. We are not affiliated with the Reference Asset Issuer and the Reference Asset Issuer will have no obligations with respect to the notes. This document relates only to the notes and does not relate to the shares of the Reference Asset or any securities included in the Underlying Index. Neither we nor any of our affiliates participates in the preparation of the publicly available documents described below. Neither we nor any of our affiliates has made any due diligence inquiry with respect to the Reference Asset in connection with the offering of the notes. There can be no assurance that all events occurring prior to the date hereof, including events that would affect the accuracy or completeness of the publicly available documents described below and that would affect the trading price of the shares of the Reference Asset, have been or will be publicly disclosed. Subsequent disclosure of any events or the disclosure of or failure to disclose material future events concerning the Reference Asset could affect the price of the shares of the Reference Asset on the Valuation Date, and therefore could affect the payments on the notes.

The selection of the Reference Asset is not a recommendation to buy or sell the shares of the Reference Asset. Neither we nor any of our affiliates make any representation to you as to the performance of the shares of the Reference Asset. Information provided to or filed with the SEC under the Exchange Act and the Investment Company Act of 1940 relating to the Reference Asset may be obtained through the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov.

We encourage you to review recent levels of the Reference Asset prior to making an investment decision with respect to the notes.

The SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust (“SPY”)

The SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust is a unit investment trust that trades on the NYSE Arca under the symbol “SPY.” The SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust seeks to provide investment results that, before fees and expenses, correspond generally to the performance of the S&P 500® Index. Information provided to or filed with the SEC by the SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust can be located by reference to SEC file numbers 033-46080 and 811-06125.

The S&P 500® Index

The S&P 500® Index is intended to provide an indication of the pattern of common stock price movement. The calculation of the level of this Reference Asset is based on the relative value of the aggregate market value of the common stocks of 500 companies as of a particular time compared to the aggregate average market value of the common stocks of 500 similar companies during the base period of the years 1941 through 1943.

S&P calculates this Reference Asset by reference to the prices of the constituent stocks of this Reference Asset without taking account of the value of dividends paid on those stocks. As a result, the return on the notes will not reflect the return you would realize if you actually owned the constituent stocks of the S&P 500® Index and received the dividends paid on those stocks.

Computation of the S&P 500® Index

While S&P currently employs the following methodology to calculate the S&P 500® Index, no assurance can be given that S&P will not modify or change this methodology in a manner that may affect the Payment at Maturity.

Historically, the market value of any component stock of the S&P 500® Index was calculated as the product of the market price per share and the number of then outstanding shares of such component stock. In March 2005, S&P began shifting the S&P 500® Index halfway from a market capitalization weighted formula to a float-adjusted formula, before moving the S&P 500® Index to full float adjustment on September 16, 2005. S&P’s criteria for selecting stocks for the S&P 500® Index did not change with the shift to float adjustment. However, the adjustment affects each company’s weight in the S&P 500® Index.

Under float adjustment, the share counts used in calculating the S&P 500® Index reflect only those shares that are available to investors, not all of a company’s outstanding shares. Float adjustment excludes shares that are closely held by control groups, other publicly traded companies or government agencies.

In September 2012, all shareholdings representing more than 5% of a stock’s outstanding shares, other than holdings by “block owners,” were removed from the float for purposes of calculating the S&P 500® Index. Generally, these “control holders” will include officers and directors, private equity, venture capital and special equity firms, other publicly traded companies that hold shares for control, strategic partners, holders of restricted shares, ESOPs, employee and family trusts, foundations associated with the company, holders of unlisted share classes of stock, government entities at all levels (other than government retirement/pension funds) and any individual person who controls a 5% or greater stake in a company as reported in regulatory filings. However, holdings by block owners, such as depositary banks, pension funds, mutual funds and ETF providers, 401(k) plans of the company, government retirement/pension funds, investment funds of insurance companies, asset managers and investment funds, independent foundations and savings and investment plans, will ordinarily be considered part of the float.

Treasury stock, stock options, equity participation units, warrants, preferred stock, convertible stock, and rights are not part of the float. Shares held in a trust to allow investors in countries outside the country of domicile, such as depositary shares and Canadian exchangeable shares are normally part of the float unless those shares form a control block.

14

 

For each stock, an investable weight factor (“IWF”) is calculated by dividing the available float shares by the total shares outstanding. Available float shares are defined as the total shares outstanding less shares held by control holders. This calculation is subject to a 5% minimum threshold for control blocks. For example, if a company’s officers and directors hold 3% of the company’s shares, and no other control group holds 5% of the company’s shares, S&P would assign that company an IWF of 1.00, as no control group meets the 5% threshold. However, if a company’s officers and directors hold 3% of the company’s shares and another control group holds 20% of the company’s shares, S&P would assign an IWF of 0.77, reflecting the fact that 23% of the company’s outstanding shares are considered to be held for control. As of July 31, 2017, companies with multiple share class lines are no longer eligible for inclusion in the S&P 500® Index. Constituents of the S&P 500® Index prior to July 31, 2017 with multiple share class lines were grandfathered in and continue to be included in the S&P 500® Index. If a constituent company of the S&P 500® Index reorganizes into a multiple share class line structure, that company will remain in the S&P 500® Index at the discretion of the S&P Index Committee in order to minimize turnover.

The S&P 500® Index is calculated using a base-weighted aggregate methodology. The level of the S&P 500® Index reflects the total market value of all 500 component stocks relative to the base period of the years 1941 through 1943. An indexed number is used to represent the results of this calculation in order to make the level easier to use and track over time. The actual total market value of the component stocks during the base period of the years 1941 through 1943 has been set to an indexed level of 10. This is often indicated by the notation 1941-43 = 10. In practice, the daily calculation of the S&P 500® Index is computed by dividing the total market value of the component stocks by the “index divisor.” By itself, the index divisor is an arbitrary number. However, in the context of the calculation of the S&P 500® Index, it serves as a link to the original base period level of the S&P 500® Index. The index divisor keeps the S&P 500® Index comparable over time and is the manipulation point for all adjustments to the S&P 500® Index, which is index maintenance.

Index Maintenance

Index maintenance includes monitoring and completing the adjustments for company additions and deletions, share changes, stock splits, stock dividends, and stock price adjustments due to company restructuring or spinoffs. Some corporate actions, such as stock splits and stock dividends, require changes in the common shares outstanding and the stock prices of the companies in the S&P 500® Index, and do not require index divisor adjustments.

To prevent the level of the S&P 500® Index from changing due to corporate actions, corporate actions which affect the total market value of the S&P 500® Index require an index divisor adjustment. By adjusting the index divisor for the change in market value, the level of the S&P 500® Index remains constant and does not reflect the corporate actions of individual companies in the S&P 500® Index. Index divisor adjustments are made after the close of trading and after the calculation of the S&P 500® Index closing level.

Changes in a company’s total shares outstanding of 5% or more due to public offerings are made as soon as reasonably possible. Other changes of 5% or more (for example, due to tender offers, Dutch auctions, voluntary exchange offers, company stock repurchases, private placements, acquisitions of private companies or non-index companies that do not trade on a major exchange, redemptions, exercise of options, warrants, conversion of preferred stock, notes, debt, equity participations, at-the-market stock offerings or other recapitalizations) are made weekly, and are generally announced on Fridays for implementation after the close of trading the following Friday (one week later). If a 5% or more share change causes a company’s IWF to change by five percentage points or more, the IWF is updated at the same time as the share change. IWF changes resulting from partial tender offers are considered on a case-by-case basis.

 

15

 

Validity of the Notes

In the opinion of Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP, the issue and sale of the notes has been duly authorized by all necessary corporate action of the Bank in conformity with the Senior Indenture, and when this pricing supplement has been attached to, and duly notated on, the master note that represents the notes, the notes will have been validly executed and issued and, to the extent validity of the notes is a matter governed by the laws of the Province of Ontario, or the laws of Canada applicable therein, and will be valid obligations of the Bank, subject to the following limitations (i) the enforceability of the Senior Indenture may be limited by the Canada Deposit Insurance Corporation Act (Canada), the Winding-up and Restructuring Act (Canada) and bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, receivership, moratorium, arrangement or winding-up laws or other similar laws affecting the enforcement of creditors’ rights generally; (ii) the enforceability of the Senior Indenture may be limited by equitable principles, including the principle that equitable remedies such as specific performance and injunction may only be granted in the discretion of a court of competent jurisdiction; (iii) pursuant to the Currency Act (Canada) a judgment by a Canadian court must be awarded in Canadian currency and that such judgment may be based on a rate of exchange in existence on a day other than the day of payment; and (iv) the enforceability of the Senior Indenture will be subject to the limitations contained in the Limitations Act, 2002 (Ontario), and such counsel expresses no opinion as to whether a court may find any provision of the Senior Debt Indenture to be unenforceable as an attempt to vary or exclude a limitation period under that Act. This opinion is given as of the date hereof and is limited to the laws of the Provinces of Ontario and the federal laws of Canada applicable thereto. In addition, this opinion is subject to customary assumptions about the trustee’s authorization, execution and delivery of the Indenture and the genuineness of signatures and certain factual matters, all as stated in the letter of such counsel dated March 25, 2025, which has been filed as Exhibit 5.3 to Bank of Montreal’s Form 6-K filed with the SEC and dated March 25, 2025.

In the opinion of Mayer Brown LLP, when this pricing supplement has been attached to, and duly notated on, the master note that represents the notes, and the notes have been issued and sold as contemplated herein, the notes will be valid, binding and enforceable obligations of Bank of Montreal, entitled to the benefits of the Senior Indenture, subject to applicable bankruptcy, insolvency and similar laws affecting creditors’ rights generally, concepts of reasonableness and equitable principles of general applicability (including, without limitation, concepts of good faith, fair dealing and the lack of bad faith). This opinion is given as of the date hereof and is limited to the laws of the State of New York. Insofar as this opinion involves matters governed by the laws of the Province of Ontario, or the laws of Canada applicable therein, Mayer Brown LLP has assumed, without independent inquiry or investigation, the validity of the matters opined on by Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP, Canadian legal counsel for the issuer, in its opinion expressed above. This opinion is subject to customary assumptions about the trustee’s authorization, execution and delivery of the Senior Indenture and the genuineness of signatures and to such counsel’s reliance on the Bank of Montreal and other sources as to certain factual matters, all as stated in the legal opinion of Mayer Brown LLP dated March 25, 2025, which has been filed with the SEC as an exhibit to a report on Form 6-K by the Bank of Montreal on March 25, 2025.

16

 

FAQ

When is Allied Gaming & Entertainment's 2024-2025 annual meeting?

The virtual audio-only meeting will be held on [•] 2025 at [•] a.m. ET; shareholders must pre-register and use the 16-digit control number.

What percentage of AGAE shares does Knighted Pastures LLC own?

Knighted and its affiliates hold approximately 31.5 % of Allied Gaming & Entertainment’s outstanding common stock.

How many director seats are being contested at AGAE?

Six seats—three Class B and three Class C—are up for election; Knighted has proposed an alternative six-member slate.

Why are there two different proxy cards for AGAE shareholders?

The company’s WHITE card lists management’s nominees only; Knighted may issue its own card. Court rulings could require a universal card later.

Who is Allied Gaming & Entertainment’s proposed auditor for 2024 and 2025?

The board seeks ratification of ZH CPA, LLC as independent registered public accounting firm for both fiscal years.

What does the board recommend for say-on-pay vote frequency?

Management supports a three-year (triennial) frequency for future advisory votes on executive compensation.
MicroSectors™ Energy 3X Leveraged ETN

NYSE:WTIU

WTIU Rankings

WTIU Latest News

WTIU Latest SEC Filings

WTIU Stock Data

1.50M
Commercial Banking
Commercial Banks, Nec
Link
Canada
TORONTO