Americold Announces Second Quarter 2025 Results
Americold Realty Trust (NYSE:COLD), a global temperature-controlled logistics leader, reported Q2 2025 results with total revenues of $650.7M, down 1.5% year-over-year. The company delivered net income of $1.6M ($0.01 per share), improving from a loss of $0.23 per share in Q2 2024.
Key metrics include Adjusted FFO of $103.6M ($0.36 per share), Core EBITDA of $159.1M, and Global Warehouse same-store NOI decrease of 4.2%. Due to challenging market conditions affecting occupancy and throughput, Americold revised its 2025 AFFO guidance to $1.39-$1.45 per share.
The company launched three strategic development projects in Q2: a Kansas City facility with CPKC, an Allentown expansion, and a flagship facility in Dubai's Port of Jebel Ali, all showing strong customer demand.
Americold Realty Trust (NYSE:COLD), leader globale nella logistica a temperatura controllata, ha comunicato i risultati del secondo trimestre 2025 con ricavi totali di 650,7 milioni di dollari, in calo dell'1,5% rispetto allo stesso periodo dell'anno precedente. L'azienda ha registrato un utile netto di 1,6 milioni di dollari (0,01 dollari per azione), migliorando rispetto alla perdita di 0,23 dollari per azione nel Q2 2024.
I principali indicatori includono un FFO rettificato di 103,6 milioni di dollari (0,36 dollari per azione), un EBITDA Core di 159,1 milioni di dollari e una diminuzione del NOI a parità di negozio del 4,2% nei magazzini globali. A causa delle difficili condizioni di mercato che hanno influenzato l'occupazione e il throughput, Americold ha rivisto la sua guidance AFFO 2025 a 1,39-1,45 dollari per azione.
Nel secondo trimestre, l'azienda ha avviato tre progetti di sviluppo strategico: una struttura a Kansas City con CPKC, un'espansione ad Allentown e un impianto di punta nel porto di Jebel Ali a Dubai, tutti caratterizzati da una forte domanda da parte dei clienti.
Americold Realty Trust (NYSE:COLD), líder global en logística con control de temperatura, reportó resultados del segundo trimestre de 2025 con ingresos totales de 650,7 millones de dólares, una disminución del 1,5% interanual. La compañía registró un ingreso neto de 1,6 millones de dólares (0,01 dólares por acción), mejorando desde una pérdida de 0,23 dólares por acción en el Q2 de 2024.
Las métricas clave incluyen un FFO ajustado de 103,6 millones de dólares (0,36 dólares por acción), un EBITDA Core de 159,1 millones y una disminución del NOI de tiendas comparables globales del 4,2%. Debido a las condiciones desafiantes del mercado que afectan la ocupación y el flujo, Americold revisó su guía AFFO 2025 a 1,39-1,45 dólares por acción.
La compañía lanzó tres proyectos estratégicos de desarrollo en el segundo trimestre: una instalación en Kansas City con CPKC, una expansión en Allentown y una instalación emblemática en el puerto de Jebel Ali en Dubái, todos con una fuerte demanda de clientes.
Americold Realty Trust (NYSE:COLD)는 글로벌 온도 제어 물류 선도 기업으로서 2025년 2분기 실적을 발표했습니다. 총 매출 6억 5,070만 달러로 전년 동기 대비 1.5% 감소했습니다. 회사는 순이익 160만 달러(주당 0.01달러)를 기록하며 2024년 2분기 주당 0.23달러 손실에서 개선되었습니다.
주요 지표로는 조정 FFO 1억 360만 달러(주당 0.36달러), 코어 EBITDA 1억 5,910만 달러, 글로벌 창고 동일점포 NOI가 4.2% 감소한 수치를 포함합니다. 점유율과 처리량에 영향을 준 어려운 시장 상황으로 인해 Americold는 2025년 AFFO 가이던스를 주당 1.39~1.45달러로 수정했습니다.
회사는 2분기에 세 가지 전략적 개발 프로젝트를 시작했습니다: CPKC와 함께하는 캔자스시티 시설, 앨런타운 확장, 그리고 두바이 제벨 알리 항구의 대표 시설로, 모두 고객 수요가 강한 것으로 나타났습니다.
Americold Realty Trust (NYSE:COLD), leader mondial de la logistique à température contrôlée, a annoncé ses résultats pour le deuxième trimestre 2025 avec des revenus totaux de 650,7 millions de dollars, en baisse de 1,5 % par rapport à l'année précédente. La société a enregistré un bénéfice net de 1,6 million de dollars (0,01 dollar par action), une amélioration par rapport à une perte de 0,23 dollar par action au T2 2024.
Les indicateurs clés comprennent un FFO ajusté de 103,6 millions de dollars (0,36 dollar par action), un EBITDA Core de 159,1 millions et une baisse du NOI des entrepôts mondiaux comparables de 4,2 %. En raison de conditions de marché difficiles affectant l'occupation et le débit, Americold a révisé ses prévisions AFFO 2025 à 1,39-1,45 dollar par action.
La société a lancé trois projets stratégiques de développement au deuxième trimestre : une installation à Kansas City avec CPKC, une extension à Allentown et une installation phare dans le port de Jebel Ali à Dubaï, tous témoignant d'une forte demande client.
Americold Realty Trust (NYSE:COLD), ein weltweit führendes Unternehmen im Bereich temperaturkontrollierter Logistik, meldete die Ergebnisse für das zweite Quartal 2025 mit Gesamterlösen von 650,7 Mio. USD, ein Rückgang von 1,5 % im Jahresvergleich. Das Unternehmen erzielte einen Nettoertrag von 1,6 Mio. USD (0,01 USD je Aktie), eine Verbesserung gegenüber einem Verlust von 0,23 USD je Aktie im zweiten Quartal 2024.
Wichtige Kennzahlen umfassen ein bereinigtes FFO von 103,6 Mio. USD (0,36 USD je Aktie), ein Core-EBITDA von 159,1 Mio. USD und einen Rückgang des Global Warehouse Same-Store-NOI um 4,2 %. Aufgrund herausfordernder Marktbedingungen, die Belegung und Durchsatz beeinträchtigen, hat Americold seine AFFO-Prognose für 2025 auf 1,39–1,45 USD je Aktie angepasst.
Im zweiten Quartal startete das Unternehmen drei strategische Entwicklungsprojekte: eine Einrichtung in Kansas City mit CPKC, eine Erweiterung in Allentown und eine Vorzeigeeinrichtung im Hafen von Jebel Ali in Dubai, die alle eine starke Kundennachfrage aufweisen.
- Net income improved to $1.6M from a loss in Q2 2024
- Global Warehouse same store services margin increased to 13.3% from 12.4%
- Launched three strategic development projects with strong customer demand
- Warehouse services revenues per throughput pallet increased 4.1% to $38.40
- Total revenues decreased 1.5% to $650.7M year-over-year
- Global Warehouse same store NOI decreased 4.2%
- Economic occupancy declined 430 basis points to 73.8%
- Lowered full-year 2025 AFFO guidance to $1.39-$1.45 from $1.42-$1.52
Insights
Americold lowered 2025 guidance amid challenging demand environment; warehouse occupancy down 500bps despite improved services margin.
Americold Realty Trust reported
The warehouse segment shows mixed performance: physical occupancy dropped significantly to
Core EBITDA declined
Most notably, management reduced full-year AFFO guidance to
On the positive side, Americold launched three new development projects during the quarter: a Kansas City facility in partnership with CPKC railway, an Allentown expansion, and a Dubai port facility with DP World. These build-to-suit developments with committed customers should provide stable future cash flows once operational.
The company's maintenance capex guidance reduction from
Launched Three Innovative and Demand-Driven Development Projects
Delivered
Updated 2025 Full-Year Outlook
ATLANTA, GA., Aug. 07, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Americold Realty Trust, Inc. (NYSE: COLD) (the “Company”), a global leader in temperature-controlled logistics, real estate, and value-added services focused on the ownership, operation, acquisition and development of temperature-controlled warehouses, today announced financial and operating results for the second quarter ended June 30, 2025.
George Chappelle, Chief Executive Officer of Americold Realty Trust, said, “Our team continues to execute well in the current market, despite the impacts from multiple headwinds that are constraining occupancy levels across the industry. During the second quarter we made strong progress on our four key operational priorities and won new business, while continuing to manage the business tightly. As a result, the first half of the year has largely been in-line with expectations, demonstrating the resilience and breadth of our various operating levers.”
“We continue to position the Company for future growth. Specifically, we launched three innovative and demand-driven projects during the second quarter – our development in Kansas City in partnership with CPKC, our expansion in Allentown, and finally our state-of-the-art flagship build with DP World in the Port of Jebel Ali in Dubai. All three of these facilities are seeing strong customer demand, and we look forward to their financial contributions for years to come.”
“Looking to the second half of the year, we expect the challenging demand environment to continue, with occupancy and throughput levels remaining below typical seasonality trends. As a result of these headwinds, we are adjusting our AFFO/share guidance range to
Second Quarter 2025 Highlights
- Total revenues of
$650.7 million , a1.5% decrease from$661.0 million in Q2 2024 and a decrease of1.5% on a constant currency basis. - Net income of
$1.6 million , or$0.01 per diluted share, as compared to a net loss of$0.23 per diluted share in Q2 2024. - Global Warehouse segment same store revenues decreased
1.5% on an actual and constant currency basis as compared to Q2 2024. - Global Warehouse same store services margin increased to
13.3% from12.4% in Q2 2024. - Global Warehouse segment same store NOI decreased
4.2% on an actual and constant currency basis, as compared to Q2 2024. - Adjusted FFO of
$103.6 million , or$0.36 per diluted share, a5.6% decrease from Q2 2024 Adjusted FFO per diluted share. - Core EBITDA of
$159.1 million , decreased$6.4 million , or3.9% (3.8% on a constant currency basis) from$165.5 million in Q2 2024. - Core EBITDA margin of
24.4% , decreased from25.0% in Q2 2024.
2025 Outlook
The table below includes the details of our annual guidance. The Company’s guidance is provided for informational purposes based on current plans and assumptions and is subject to change. The ranges for these metrics do not include the impact of acquisitions, dispositions, or capital markets activity beyond that which has been previously announced.
As of | ||
August 7, 2025 | May 8, 2025 | |
Warehouse segment same store revenue growth (constant currency) | (4.0)% - | |
Warehouse segment same store NOI growth (constant currency) | 50 to 100 bps lower than associated revenues | 100 bps higher than associated revenues |
Warehouse segment non-same store NOI | ||
Transportation and Third-Party Managed segment NOI | ||
Total selling, general and administrative expense (guidance as of August 7, 2025 is inclusive of share-based compensation expense of | ||
Interest expense | ||
Current income tax expense | ||
Non real estate depreciation and amortization expense | ||
Total maintenance capital expenditures | ||
Development starts(1) | ||
Adjusted FFO per share | ||
(1) Represents the aggregate invested capital for initiated development opportunities. |
Investor Webcast and Conference Call
The Company will hold a webcast and conference call on Thursday, August 7, 2025 at 8:00 a.m. Eastern Time to discuss its second quarter 2025 results. A live webcast of the call will be available via the Investors section of Americold Realty Trust’s website at www.americold.com. To listen to the live webcast, please go to the site at least fifteen minutes prior to the scheduled start time in order to register, download and install any necessary audio software. Shortly after the call, a replay of the webcast will be available for 90 days on the Company’s website.
The conference call can also be accessed by dialing 1-877-407-3982 or 1-201-493-6780. The telephone replay can be accessed by dialing 1-844-512-2921 or 1-412-317-6671 and providing the conference ID#13750776. The telephone replay will be available starting shortly after the call until August 21, 2025.
The Company’s supplemental package will be available prior to the conference call in the Investors section of the Company’s website at http://ir.americold.com.
During the conference call, the Company may discuss and answer questions concerning business and financial developments and trends that have occurred after quarter-end. The Company’s responses to questions, as well as other matters discussed during the conference call, may contain or constitute information that has not been disclosed previously.
Second Quarter 2025 Total Company Financial Results
Total revenues for the second quarter of 2025 were
Total NOI for the second quarter of 2025 was
For the second quarter of 2025, the Company reported net income of
Core EBITDA was
For the second quarter of 2025, Core FFO was
For the second quarter of 2025, Adjusted FFO was
Please see the Company’s supplemental financial information for the definitions and reconciliations of non-GAAP financial measures to the most comparable GAAP financial measures.
Second Quarter 2025 Global Warehouse Segment Results
The following tables present revenues, contribution (NOI), margins, and certain operating metrics for our global, same store, and non-same store warehouses for the three and six months ended June 30, 2025 and 2024.
Three Months Ended June 30, | Change | ||||||||||||
Dollars and units in thousands, except per pallet data | 2025 Actual | 2025 Constant Currency(1) | 2024 Actual | Actual | Constant Currency | ||||||||
TOTAL WAREHOUSE SEGMENT | |||||||||||||
Global Warehouse revenues: | |||||||||||||
Rent and storage | $ | 256,732 | $ | 256,861 | $ | 267,671 | (4.1)% | (4.0)% | |||||
Warehouse services | 337,338 | 337,527 | 332,716 | ||||||||||
Total revenues | $ | 594,070 | $ | 594,388 | $ | 600,387 | (1.1)% | (1.0)% | |||||
Global Warehouse cost of operations: | |||||||||||||
Power | 35,544 | 35,500 | 37,082 | (4.1)% | (4.3)% | ||||||||
Other facilities costs(2) | 59,675 | 59,739 | 62,385 | (4.3)% | (4.2)% | ||||||||
Labor | 248,241 | 248,573 | 245,626 | ||||||||||
Other services costs(3) | 49,605 | 49,533 | 50,763 | (2.3)% | (2.4)% | ||||||||
Total warehouse segment cost of operations | $ | 393,065 | $ | 393,345 | $ | 395,856 | (0.7)% | (0.6)% | |||||
Global Warehouse contribution (NOI) | $ | 201,005 | $ | 201,043 | $ | 204,531 | (1.7)% | (1.7)% | |||||
Rent and storage contribution (NOI)(4) | $ | 161,513 | $ | 161,622 | $ | 168,204 | (4.0)% | (3.9)% | |||||
Services contribution (NOI)(5) | $ | 39,492 | $ | 39,421 | $ | 36,327 | |||||||
Global Warehouse margin | -30 bps | -30 bps | |||||||||||
Rent and storage margin(6) | 10 bps | 10 bps | |||||||||||
Warehouse services margin(7) | 80 bps | 80 bps | |||||||||||
Global Warehouse rent and storage metrics: | |||||||||||||
Average economic occupied pallets(8) | 4,057 | n/a | 4,311 | (5.9)% | n/a | ||||||||
Average physical occupied pallets(9) | 3,454 | n/a | 3,740 | (7.6)% | n/a | ||||||||
Average physical pallet positions | 5,499 | n/a | 5,519 | (0.4)% | n/a | ||||||||
Economic occupancy percentage(8) | n/a | -430 bps | n/a | ||||||||||
Physical occupancy percentage(9) | n/a | -500 bps | n/a | ||||||||||
Total rent and storage revenues per average economic occupied pallet | $ | 63.28 | $ | 63.31 | $ | 62.09 | |||||||
Total rent and storage revenues per average physical occupied pallet | $ | 74.33 | $ | 74.37 | $ | 71.57 | |||||||
Global Warehouse services metrics: | |||||||||||||
Throughput pallets | 8,784 | n/a | 9,024 | (2.7)% | n/a | ||||||||
Total warehouse services revenues per throughput pallet | $ | 38.40 | $ | 38.43 | $ | 36.87 | |||||||
(1) The adjustments from our U.S. GAAP operating results to calculate our operating results on a constant currency basis are the effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates relative to the comparable prior period. (2) Includes real estate rent expense of (3) Includes non-real estate rent expense (equipment lease and rentals) of (4) Calculated as warehouse rent and storage revenues less power and other facilities costs. (5) Calculated as warehouse services revenues less labor and other services costs. (6) Calculated as warehouse rent and storage contribution (NOI) divided by warehouse rent and storage revenues. (7) Calculated as warehouse services contribution (NOI) divided by warehouse services revenues. (8) We define average economic occupied pallets as the sum of the average number of physically occupied pallets and otherwise contractually committed pallets for a given period, without duplication. Economic occupancy percentage is calculated by dividing the average economic occupied pallets by the estimated average of total physical pallet positions in our warehouses, regardless of whether they are occupied, for the applicable period. (9) We define average physical occupied pallets as the average number of physically occupied pallets positions in our warehouses for the applicable period. Physical occupancy percentage is calculated by dividing the average number of physically occupied pallets by the estimated average of total physical pallet positions in our warehouses, regardless of whether they are occupied, for the applicable period. (n/a = not applicable) |
Three Months Ended June 30, | Change | ||||||||||||
Dollars and units in thousands, except per pallet data | 2025 Actual | 2025 Constant Currency(1) | 2024 Actual | Actual | Constant Currency | ||||||||
SAME STORE WAREHOUSE | |||||||||||||
Number of same store warehouses | 223 | 223 | |||||||||||
Same store revenues: | |||||||||||||
Rent and storage | $ | 247,212 | $ | 247,335 | $ | 259,427 | (4.7)% | (4.7)% | |||||
Warehouse services | 325,882 | 326,010 | 322,446 | ||||||||||
Total same store revenues | $ | 573,094 | $ | 573,345 | $ | 581,873 | (1.5)% | (1.5)% | |||||
Same store cost of operations: | |||||||||||||
Power | 34,106 | 34,059 | 35,379 | (3.6)% | (3.7)% | ||||||||
Other facilities costs | 57,262 | 57,320 | 56,025 | ||||||||||
Labor | 237,173 | 237,455 | 235,609 | ||||||||||
Other services costs | 45,327 | 45,250 | 46,857 | (3.3)% | (3.4)% | ||||||||
Total same store cost of operations | $ | 373,868 | $ | 374,084 | $ | 373,870 | —% | ||||||
Same store contribution (NOI) | $ | 199,226 | $ | 199,261 | $ | 208,003 | (4.2)% | (4.2)% | |||||
Same store rent and storage contribution (NOI)(2) | $ | 155,844 | $ | 155,956 | $ | 168,023 | (7.2)% | (7.2)% | |||||
Same store services contribution (NOI)(3) | $ | 43,382 | $ | 43,305 | $ | 39,980 | |||||||
Same store margin | -90 bps | -90 bps | |||||||||||
Same store rent and storage margin(4) | -180 bps | -170 bps | |||||||||||
Same store services margin(5) | 90 bps | 90 bps | |||||||||||
Same store rent and storage metrics: | |||||||||||||
Average economic occupied pallets(6) | 3,972 | n/a | 4,203 | (5.5)% | n/a | ||||||||
Average physical occupied pallets(7) | 3,387 | n/a | 3,637 | (6.9)% | n/a | ||||||||
Average physical pallet positions | 5,263 | n/a | 5,278 | (0.3)% | n/a | ||||||||
Economic occupancy percentage(6) | n/a | -410 bps | n/a | ||||||||||
Physical occupancy percentage(7) | n/a | -450 bps | n/a | ||||||||||
Same store rent and storage revenues per average economic occupied pallet | $ | 62.24 | $ | 62.27 | $ | 61.72 | |||||||
Same store rent and storage revenues per average physical occupied pallet | $ | 72.99 | $ | 73.02 | $ | 71.33 | |||||||
Same store services metrics: | |||||||||||||
Throughput pallets | 8,577 | n/a | 8,819 | (2.7)% | n/a | ||||||||
Same store warehouse services revenues per throughput pallet | $ | 37.99 | $ | 38.01 | $ | 36.56 | |||||||
(1) The adjustments from our U.S. GAAP operating results to calculate our operating results on a constant currency basis are the effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates relative to the comparable prior period. (2) Calculated as same store rent and storage revenues less same store power and other facilities costs. (3) Calculated as same store warehouse services revenues less same store labor and other services costs. (4) Calculated as same store rent and storage contribution (NOI) divided by same store rent and storage revenues. (5) Calculated as same store services contribution (NOI) divided by same store services revenues. (6) We define average economic occupied pallets as the sum of the average number of physically occupied pallets and otherwise contractually committed pallets for a given period, without duplication. Economic occupancy percentage is calculated by dividing the average economic occupied pallets by the estimated average of total physical pallet positions in our warehouses, regardless of whether they are occupied, for the applicable period. (7) We define average physical occupied pallets as the average number of physically occupied pallets positions in our warehouses for the applicable period. Physical occupancy percentage is calculated by dividing the average number of physically occupied pallets by the estimated average of total physical pallet positions in our warehouses, regardless of whether they are occupied, for the applicable period. (n/a = not applicable) |
Three Months Ended June 30, | Change | ||||||||||||
Dollars and units in thousands, except per pallet data | 2025 Actual | 2025 Constant Currency(1) | 2024 Actual | Actual | Constant Currency | ||||||||
NON-SAME STORE WAREHOUSE | |||||||||||||
Number of non-same store warehouses(2) | 11 | 12 | |||||||||||
Non-same store revenues: | |||||||||||||
Rent and storage | $ | 9,520 | $ | 9,526 | $ | 8,244 | n/r | n/r | |||||
Warehouse services | 11,456 | 11,517 | 10,270 | n/r | n/r | ||||||||
Total non-same store revenues | $ | 20,976 | $ | 21,043 | $ | 18,514 | n/r | n/r | |||||
Non-same store cost of operations: | |||||||||||||
Power | 1,438 | 1,441 | 1,703 | n/r | n/r | ||||||||
Other facilities costs | 2,413 | 2,419 | 6,360 | n/r | n/r | ||||||||
Labor | 11,068 | 11,118 | 10,017 | n/r | n/r | ||||||||
Other services costs | 4,278 | 4,283 | 3,906 | n/r | n/r | ||||||||
Total non-same store cost of operations | $ | 19,197 | $ | 19,261 | $ | 21,986 | n/r | n/r | |||||
Non-same store contribution (NOI) | $ | 1,779 | $ | 1,782 | $ | (3,472) | n/r | n/r | |||||
Non-same store rent and storage contribution (NOI)(3) | $ | 5,669 | $ | 5,666 | $ | 181 | n/r | n/r | |||||
Non-same store services contribution (NOI)(4) | $ | (3,890) | $ | (3,884) | $ | (3,653) | n/r | n/r | |||||
Non-same store rent and storage metrics: | |||||||||||||
Average economic occupied pallets(5) | 85 | n/a | 108 | n/r | n/a | ||||||||
Average physical occupied pallets(6) | 67 | n/a | 103 | n/r | n/a | ||||||||
Average physical pallet positions | 236 | n/a | 241 | n/r | n/a | ||||||||
Economic occupancy percentage(5) | n/a | n/r | n/a | ||||||||||
Physical occupancy percentage(6) | n/a | n/r | n/a | ||||||||||
Non-same store rent and storage revenues per average economic occupied pallet | $ | 112.00 | $ | 112.07 | $ | 76.33 | n/r | n/r | |||||
Non-same store rent and storage revenues per average physical occupied pallet | $ | 142.09 | $ | 142.18 | $ | 80.04 | n/r | n/r | |||||
Non-same store services metrics: | |||||||||||||
Throughput pallets | 207 | n/a | 205 | n/r | n/a | ||||||||
Non-same store warehouse services revenues per throughput pallet | $ | 55.34 | $ | 55.64 | $ | 50.10 | n/r | n/r | |||||
(1) The adjustments from our U.S. GAAP operating results to calculate our operating results on a constant currency basis are the effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates relative to the comparable prior period. (2) As of June 30, 2025, the non-same store facility count consists of: 6 facilities where the executive leadership team has approved exits in the current year (4 of which are leased facilities and 2 of which are owned facilities and the Company is in pursuit to sell), 4 sites in the recently completed expansion and development phase (further detailed in the External Development and Capital Deployment section of our quarterly supplement), and 1 facility that we purchased in 2025. As of June 30, 2025, there are 4 sites in the development and expansion phase. (3) Calculated as non-same store rent and storage revenues less non-same store power and other facilities costs. (4) Calculated as non-same store warehouse services revenues less non-same store labor and other services costs. (5) We define average economic occupied pallets as the sum of the average number of physically occupied pallets and otherwise contractually committed pallets for a given period, without duplication. Economic occupancy percentage is calculated by dividing the average economic occupied pallets by the estimated average of total physical pallet positions in our warehouses, regardless of whether they are occupied, for the applicable period. (6) We define average physical occupied pallets as the average number of physically occupied pallets positions in our warehouses for the applicable period. Physical occupancy percentage is calculated by dividing the average number of physically occupied pallets by the estimated average of total physical pallet positions in our warehouses, regardless of whether they are occupied, for the applicable period. (n/a = not applicable) (n/r = not relevant) |
Six Months Ended June 30, | Change | ||||||||||||
Dollars and units in thousands, except per pallet data | 2025 Actual | 2025 Constant Currency(1) | 2024 Actual | Actual | Constant Currency | ||||||||
TOTAL WAREHOUSE SEGMENT | |||||||||||||
Global Warehouse revenues: | |||||||||||||
Rent and storage | $ | 511,311 | $ | 513,762 | $ | 537,095 | (4.8)% | (4.3)% | |||||
Warehouse services | 658,116 | 661,494 | 661,002 | (0.4)% | |||||||||
Total revenues | $ | 1,169,427 | $ | 1,175,256 | $ | 1,198,097 | (2.4)% | (1.9)% | |||||
Global Warehouse cost of operations: | |||||||||||||
Power | 67,253 | 67,586 | 70,415 | (4.5)% | (4.0)% | ||||||||
Other facilities costs(2) | 117,225 | 117,834 | 127,980 | (8.4)% | (7.9)% | ||||||||
Labor | 489,153 | 491,966 | 493,799 | (0.9)% | (0.4)% | ||||||||
Other services costs(3) | 98,206 | 98,628 | 104,241 | (5.8)% | (5.4)% | ||||||||
Total warehouse segment cost of operations | $ | 771,837 | $ | 776,014 | $ | 796,435 | (3.1)% | (2.6)% | |||||
Global Warehouse contribution (NOI) | $ | 397,590 | $ | 399,242 | $ | 401,662 | (1.0)% | (0.6)% | |||||
Rent and storage contribution (NOI)(4) | $ | 326,833 | $ | 328,342 | $ | 338,700 | (3.5)% | (3.1)% | |||||
Services contribution (NOI)(5) | $ | 70,757 | $ | 70,900 | $ | 62,962 | |||||||
Global Warehouse margin | 50 bps | 50 bps | |||||||||||
Rent and storage margin(6) | 80 bps | 80 bps | |||||||||||
Warehouse services margin(7) | 130 bps | 120 bps | |||||||||||
Global Warehouse rent and storage metrics: | |||||||||||||
Average economic occupied pallets(8) | 4,093 | n/a | 4,353 | (6.0)% | n/a | ||||||||
Average physical occupied pallets(9) | 3,477 | n/a | 3,775 | (7.9)% | n/a | ||||||||
Average physical pallet positions | 5,512 | n/a | 5,525 | (0.2)% | n/a | ||||||||
Economic occupancy percentage(8) | n/a | -450 bps | n/a | ||||||||||
Physical occupancy percentage(9) | n/a | -520 bps | n/a | ||||||||||
Total rent and storage revenues per average economic occupied pallet | $ | 124.92 | $ | 125.52 | $ | 123.39 | |||||||
Total rent and storage revenues per average physical occupied pallet | $ | 147.06 | $ | 147.76 | $ | 142.28 | |||||||
Global Warehouse services metrics: | |||||||||||||
Throughput pallets | 17,515 | n/a | 18,075 | (3.1)% | n/a | ||||||||
Total warehouse services revenues per throughput pallet | $ | 37.57 | $ | 37.77 | $ | 36.57 | |||||||
(1) The adjustments from our U.S. GAAP operating results to calculate our operating results on a constant currency basis are the effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates relative to the comparable prior period. (2) Includes real estate rent expense of (3) Includes non-real estate rent expense (equipment lease and rentals) of (4) Calculated as warehouse rent and storage revenues less power and other facilities costs. (5) Calculated as warehouse services revenues less labor and other services costs. (6) Calculated as warehouse rent and storage contribution (NOI) divided by warehouse rent and storage revenues. (7) Calculated as warehouse services contribution (NOI) divided by warehouse services revenues. (8) We define average economic occupied pallets as the sum of the average number of physically occupied pallets and otherwise contractually committed pallets for a given period, without duplication. Economic occupancy percentage is calculated by dividing the average economic occupied pallets by the estimated average of total physical pallet positions in our warehouses, regardless of whether they are occupied, for the applicable period. (9) We define average physical occupied pallets as the average number of physically occupied pallets positions in our warehouses for the applicable period. Physical occupancy percentage is calculated by dividing the average number of physically occupied pallets by the estimated average of total physical pallet positions in our warehouses, regardless of whether they are occupied, for the applicable period. (n/a = not applicable) |
Six Months Ended June 30, | Change | ||||||||||||
Dollars and units in thousands, except per pallet data | 2025 Actual | 2025 Constant Currency(1) | 2024 Actual | Actual | Constant Currency | ||||||||
SAME STORE WAREHOUSE | |||||||||||||
Number of same store warehouses | 223 | 223 | |||||||||||
Same store revenues: | |||||||||||||
Rent and storage | $ | 492,408 | $ | 494,852 | $ | 516,198 | (4.6)% | (4.1)% | |||||
Warehouse services | 640,705 | 644,015 | 638,938 | ||||||||||
Total same store revenues | $ | 1,133,113 | $ | 1,138,867 | $ | 1,155,136 | (1.9)% | (1.4)% | |||||
Same store cost of operations: | |||||||||||||
Power | 64,762 | 65,093 | 66,292 | (2.3)% | (1.8)% | ||||||||
Other facilities costs | 114,507 | 115,110 | 112,592 | ||||||||||
Labor | 471,813 | 474,573 | 471,026 | ||||||||||
Other services costs | 90,090 | 90,504 | 96,021 | (6.2)% | (5.7)% | ||||||||
Total same store cost of operations | $ | 741,172 | $ | 745,280 | $ | 745,931 | (0.6)% | (0.1)% | |||||
Same store contribution (NOI) | $ | 391,941 | $ | 393,587 | $ | 409,205 | (4.2)% | (3.8)% | |||||
Same store rent and storage contribution (NOI)(2) | $ | 313,139 | $ | 314,649 | $ | 337,314 | (7.2)% | (6.7)% | |||||
Same store services contribution (NOI)(3) | $ | 78,802 | $ | 78,938 | $ | 71,891 | |||||||
Same store margin | -80 bps | -80 bps | |||||||||||
Same store rent and storage margin(4) | -170 bps | -170 bps | |||||||||||
Same store services margin(5) | 100 bps | 100 bps | |||||||||||
Same store rent and storage metrics: | |||||||||||||
Average economic occupied pallets(6) | 4,008 | n/a | 4,235 | (5.4)% | n/a | ||||||||
Average physical occupied pallets(7) | 3,411 | n/a | 3,668 | (7.0)% | n/a | ||||||||
Average physical pallet positions | 5,271 | n/a | 5,279 | (0.2)% | n/a | ||||||||
Economic occupancy percentage(6) | n/a | -420 bps | n/a | ||||||||||
Physical occupancy percentage(7) | n/a | -480 bps | n/a | ||||||||||
Same store rent and storage revenues per average economic occupied pallet | $ | 122.86 | $ | 123.47 | $ | 121.89 | |||||||
Same store rent and storage revenues per average physical occupied pallet | $ | 144.36 | $ | 145.08 | $ | 140.73 | |||||||
Same store services metrics: | |||||||||||||
Throughput pallets | 17,138 | n/a | 17,634 | (2.8)% | n/a | ||||||||
Same store warehouse services revenues per throughput pallet | $ | 37.39 | $ | 37.58 | $ | 36.23 | |||||||
(1) The adjustments from our U.S. GAAP operating results to calculate our operating results on a constant currency basis are the effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates relative to the comparable prior period. (2) Calculated as same store rent and storage revenues less same store power and other facilities costs. (3) Calculated as same store warehouse services revenues less same store labor and other services costs. (4) Calculated as same store rent and storage contribution (NOI) divided by same store rent and storage revenues. (5) Calculated as same store services contribution (NOI) divided by same store services revenues. (6) We define average economic occupied pallets as the sum of the average number of physically occupied pallets and otherwise contractually committed pallets for a given period, without duplication. Economic occupancy percentage is calculated by dividing the average economic occupied pallets by the estimated average of total physical pallet positions in our warehouses, regardless of whether they are occupied, for the applicable period. (7) We define average physical occupied pallets as the average number of physically occupied pallets positions in our warehouses for the applicable period. Physical occupancy percentage is calculated by dividing the average number of physically occupied pallets by the estimated average of total physical pallet positions in our warehouses, regardless of whether they are occupied, for the applicable period. (n/a = not applicable) |
Six Months Ended June 30, | Change | ||||||||||||
Dollars and units in thousands, except per pallet data | 2025 Actual | 2025 Constant Currency(1) | 2024 Actual | Actual | Constant Currency | ||||||||
NON-SAME STORE WAREHOUSE | |||||||||||||
Number of non-same store warehouses(2) | 11 | 12 | |||||||||||
Non-same store revenues: | |||||||||||||
Rent and storage | $ | 18,903 | $ | 18,910 | $ | 20,897 | n/r | n/r | |||||
Warehouse services | 17,411 | 17,479 | 22,064 | n/r | n/r | ||||||||
Total non-same store revenues | $ | 36,314 | $ | 36,389 | $ | 42,961 | n/r | n/r | |||||
Non-same store cost of operations: | |||||||||||||
Power | 2,491 | 2,493 | 4,123 | n/r | n/r | ||||||||
Other facilities costs | 2,718 | 2,724 | 15,388 | n/r | n/r | ||||||||
Labor | 17,340 | 17,393 | 22,773 | n/r | n/r | ||||||||
Other services costs | 8,116 | 8,124 | 8,220 | n/r | n/r | ||||||||
Total non-same store cost of operations | $ | 30,665 | $ | 30,734 | $ | 50,504 | n/r | n/r | |||||
Non-same store contribution (NOI) | $ | 5,649 | $ | 5,655 | $ | (7,543) | n/r | n/r | |||||
Non-same store rent and storage contribution (NOI)(3) | $ | 13,694 | $ | 13,693 | $ | 1,386 | n/r | n/r | |||||
Non-same store services contribution (NOI)(4) | $ | (8,045) | $ | (8,038) | $ | (8,929) | n/r | n/r | |||||
Non-same store rent and storage metrics: | |||||||||||||
Average economic occupied pallets(5) | 85 | n/a | 118 | n/r | n/a | ||||||||
Average physical occupied pallets(6) | 66 | n/a | 107 | n/r | n/a | ||||||||
Average physical pallet positions | 241 | n/a | 246 | n/r | n/a | ||||||||
Economic occupancy percentage(5) | n/a | n/r | n/a | ||||||||||
Physical occupancy percentage(6) | n/a | n/r | n/a | ||||||||||
Non-same store rent and storage revenues per average economic occupied pallet | $ | 222.39 | $ | 222.47 | $ | 177.09 | n/r | n/r | |||||
Non-same store rent and storage revenues per average physical occupied pallet | $ | 286.41 | $ | 286.52 | $ | 195.30 | n/r | n/r | |||||
Non-same store services metrics: | |||||||||||||
Throughput pallets | 377 | n/a | 441 | n/r | n/a | ||||||||
Non-same store warehouse services revenues per throughput pallet | $ | 46.18 | $ | 46.36 | $ | 50.03 | n/r | n/r | |||||
(1) The adjustments from our U.S. GAAP operating results to calculate our operating results on a constant currency basis are the effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates relative to the comparable prior period. (2) As of June 30, 2025, the non-same store facility count consists of: 6 facilities where the executive leadership team has approved exits in the current year (4 of which are leased facilities and 2 of which are owned facilities and the Company is in pursuit to sell), 4 sites in the recently completed expansion and development phase (further detailed in the External Development and Capital Deployment section of our quarterly supplement), and 1 facility that we purchased in 2025. As of June 30, 2025, there are 4 sites in the development and expansion phase. (3) Calculated as non-same store rent and storage revenues less non-same store power and other facilities costs. (4) Calculated as non-same store warehouse services revenues less non-same store labor and other services costs. (5) We define average economic occupied pallets as the sum of the average number of physically occupied pallets and otherwise contractually committed pallets for a given period, without duplication. Economic occupancy percentage is calculated by dividing the average economic occupied pallets by the estimated average of total physical pallet positions in our warehouses, regardless of whether they are occupied, for the applicable period. (6) We define average physical occupied pallets as the average number of physically occupied pallets positions in our warehouses for the applicable period. Physical occupancy percentage is calculated by dividing the average number of physically occupied pallets by the estimated average of total physical pallet positions in our warehouses, regardless of whether they are occupied, for the applicable period. (n/a = not applicable) (n/r = not relevant) |
Warehouse Results
For the second quarter of 2025, Global Warehouse segment revenues were
Global Warehouse segment contribution (NOI) was
Fixed Commitment Rent and Storage Revenues
As of June 30, 2025,
Economic and Physical Occupancy
Fixed commitments storage contracts are designed to ensure the Company’s customers have space available when needed. For the second quarter of 2025, economic occupancy for the total warehouse segment was
Real Estate Portfolio
As of June 30, 2025, the Company’s portfolio consists of 237 facilities. The Company ended the second quarter of 2025 with 234 facilities in its Global Warehouse segment portfolio and 3 facilities in its Third-party managed segment. The same store population consists of 223 facilities for the quarter ended June 30, 2025. As of June 30, 2025, the non-same store facility count consists of: 6 facilities where the executive leadership team has approved exits in the current year (4 of which are leased facilities and 2 of which are owned facilities and the Company is in pursuit to sell), 4 sites in the recently completed expansion and development phase (further detailed in the External Development and Capital Deployment section of our quarterly supplement), and 1 facility that we purchased in 2025. As of June 30, 2025, there are 4 sites in the development and expansion phase.
Balance Sheet Activity and Liquidity
As of June 30, 2025, the Company had total liquidity of approximately
Dividend
On May 20, 2025, the Company’s Board of Directors declared a
About the Company
Americold is a global leader in temperature-controlled logistics real estate and value-added services. Focused on the ownership, operation, acquisition and development of temperature-controlled warehouses, Americold owns and/or operates 237 temperature-controlled warehouses, with approximately 1.5 billion refrigerated cubic feet of storage, in North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, and South America. Americold’s facilities are an integral component of the supply chain connecting food producers, processors, distributors and retailers to consumers.
Non-GAAP Measures
We use the following non-GAAP financial measures as supplemental performance measures of our business: NAREIT FFO, Core FFO, Adjusted FFO, NAREIT EBITDAre, Core EBITDA, Core EBITDA margin, net debt to pro-forma Core EBITDA, segment contribution (“NOI”) and margin, same store revenues and NOI, certain constant currency metrics, and maintenance capital expenditures. Definitions of these non-GAAP metrics are included in our quarterly financial supplement, and reconciliations of these non-GAAP measures to their most comparable US GAAP metrics are included herein. Each of the non-GAAP measures included in this press release has limitations as an analytical tool and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for an analysis of the Company’s results calculated in accordance with GAAP. In addition, because not all companies use identical calculations, the Company’s presentation of non-GAAP measures in this press release may not be comparable to similarly titled measures disclosed by other companies, including other REITs.
Forward-Looking Statements
This press release contains statements about future events and expectations that constitute forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are based on our beliefs, assumptions and expectations of our future financial and operating performance and growth plans, taking into account the information currently available to us. These statements are not statements of historical fact. Forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties that may cause our actual results to differ materially from the expectations of future results we express or imply in any forward-looking statements, and you should not place undue reliance on such statements. Factors that could contribute to these differences include the following: rising inflationary pressures, increased interest rates and operating costs; national, international, regional and local economic conditions, including impacts and uncertainty from trade disputes and tariffs on goods imported to the United States and goods exported to other countries; periods of economic slowdown or recession; labor and power costs; labor shortages; our relationship with our associates, the occurrence of any work stoppages or any disputes under our collective bargaining agreements and employment related litigation; the impact of supply chain disruptions; risks related to rising construction costs; risks related to expansions of existing properties and developments of new properties, including failure to meet budgeted or stabilized returns within expected time frames, or at all, in respect thereof; uncertainty of revenues, given the nature of our customer contracts; acquisition risks, including the failure to identify or complete attractive acquisitions or failure to realize the intended benefits from our recent acquisitions; difficulties in expanding our operations into new markets; uncertainties and risks related to public health crises; a failure of our information technology systems, systems conversions and integrations, cybersecurity attacks or a breach of our information security systems, networks or processes; risks related to implementation of the new ERP system, defaults or non-renewals of significant customer contracts; risks related to privacy and data security concerns, and data collection and transfer restrictions and related foreign regulations; changes in applicable governmental regulations and tax legislation; risks related to current and potential international operations and properties; actions by our competitors and their increasing ability to compete with us; changes in foreign currency exchange rates; the potential liabilities, costs and regulatory impacts associated with our in-house trucking services and the potential disruptions associated with our use of third-party trucking service providers for transportation services to our customers; liabilities as a result of our participation in multi-employer pension plans; risks related to the partial ownership of properties, including our JV investments; risks related to natural disasters; adverse economic or real estate developments in our geographic markets or the temperature-controlled warehouse industry; changes in real estate and zoning laws and increases in real property tax rates; general economic conditions; risks associated with the ownership of real estate generally and temperature-controlled warehouses in particular; possible environmental liabilities; uninsured losses or losses in excess of our insurance coverage; financial market fluctuations; our failure to obtain necessary outside financing on attractive terms, or at all; risks related to, or restrictions contained in, our debt financings; decreased storage rates or increased vacancy rates; the potential dilutive effect of our common stock offerings, including our ongoing at the market program; the cost and time requirements as a result of our operation as a publicly traded REIT; and our failure to maintain our status as a REIT.
Words such as “anticipates,” “believes,” “continues,” “estimates,” “expects,” “goal,” “objectives,” “intends,” “may,” “opportunity,” “plans,” “potential,” “near-term,” “long-term,” “projections,” “assumptions,” “projects,” “guidance,” “forecasts,” “outlook,” “target,” “trends,” “should,” “could,” “would,” “will” and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements, although not all forward-looking statements may contain such words. Examples of forward-looking statements included in this press release include, but are not limited to, those regarding our 2025 outlook and our migration of our customers to fixed commitment storage contracts. We qualify any forward-looking statements entirely by these cautionary factors. Other risks, uncertainties and factors, including those discussed under “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024, and other reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, could cause our actual results to differ materially from those projected in any forward-looking statements we make. We assume no obligation to update or revise these forward-looking statements for any reason, or to update the reasons actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements, even if new information becomes available in the future except to the extent required by law.
Contacts:
Americold Realty Trust, Inc.
Investor Relations
Telephone: 678-459-1959
Email: investor.relations@americold.com
Americold Realty Trust, Inc. and Subsidiaries | ||||||||
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited) | ||||||||
(In thousands, except shares and per share amounts) | ||||||||
June 30, 2025 | December 31, 2024 | |||||||
Assets | ||||||||
Property, buildings, and equipment: | ||||||||
Land | $ | 832,480 | $ | 806,981 | ||||
Buildings and improvements | 4,577,009 | 4,462,565 | ||||||
Machinery and equipment | 1,671,187 | 1,598,502 | ||||||
Assets under construction | 886,925 | 606,233 | ||||||
7,967,601 | 7,474,281 | |||||||
Accumulated depreciation | (2,616,706 | ) | (2,453,597 | ) | ||||
Property, buildings, and equipment – net | 5,350,895 | 5,020,684 | ||||||
Operating leases - net | 178,868 | 222,294 | ||||||
Financing leases - net | 122,440 | 104,216 | ||||||
Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash | 101,376 | 47,652 | ||||||
Accounts receivable – net of allowance of | 366,456 | 386,924 | ||||||
Identifiable intangible assets – net | 839,730 | 838,660 | ||||||
Goodwill | 828,457 | 784,042 | ||||||
Investments in and advances to partially owned entities | 35,618 | 40,252 | ||||||
Other assets | 265,779 | 291,230 | ||||||
Total assets | $ | 8,089,619 | $ | 7,735,954 | ||||
Liabilities and Equity | ||||||||
Liabilities | ||||||||
Borrowings under revolving line of credit | $ | 293,570 | $ | 255,052 | ||||
Accounts payable and accrued expenses | 579,642 | 603,411 | ||||||
Senior unsecured notes and term loans – net of deferred financing costs of | 3,544,831 | 3,031,462 | ||||||
Sale-leaseback financing obligations | 77,031 | 79,001 | ||||||
Financing lease obligations | 116,133 | 95,784 | ||||||
Operating lease obligations | 175,963 | 219,099 | ||||||
Unearned revenues | 21,952 | 21,979 | ||||||
Deferred tax liability - net | 127,596 | 115,772 | ||||||
Other liabilities | 7,581 | 7,389 | ||||||
Total liabilities | 4,944,299 | 4,428,949 | ||||||
Equity | ||||||||
Stockholders' equity: | ||||||||
Common stock, | 2,847 | 2,842 | ||||||
Paid-in capital | 5,657,220 | 5,646,879 | ||||||
Accumulated deficit and distributions in excess of net earnings | (2,487,951 | ) | (2,341,654 | ) | ||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss | (58,468 | ) | (27,279 | ) | ||||
Total stockholders’ equity | 3,113,648 | 3,280,788 | ||||||
Noncontrolling interests | 31,672 | 26,217 | ||||||
Total equity | 3,145,320 | 3,307,005 | ||||||
Total liabilities and equity | $ | 8,089,619 | $ | 7,735,954 |
Americold Realty Trust, Inc. and Subsidiaries | ||||||||||||||||
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||
(In thousands, except per share amounts) | ||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2025 | 2024 | 2025 | 2024 | |||||||||||||
Revenues: | ||||||||||||||||
Rent, storage, and warehouse services | $ | 594,070 | $ | 600,387 | $ | 1,169,427 | $ | 1,198,097 | ||||||||
Transportation services | 48,097 | 50,637 | 92,090 | 107,490 | ||||||||||||
Third-party managed services | 8,581 | 9,931 | 18,211 | 20,348 | ||||||||||||
Total revenues | 650,748 | 660,955 | 1,279,728 | 1,325,935 | ||||||||||||
Operating expenses: | ||||||||||||||||
Rent, storage, and warehouse services cost of operations | 393,065 | 395,856 | 771,837 | 796,435 | ||||||||||||
Transportation services cost of operations | 39,355 | 41,787 | 76,094 | 87,118 | ||||||||||||
Third-party managed services cost of operations | 6,672 | 7,829 | 14,293 | 16,063 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 90,462 | 89,649 | 179,444 | 181,744 | ||||||||||||
Selling, general, and administrative | 66,907 | 59,453 | 136,142 | 124,879 | ||||||||||||
Acquisition, cyber incident, and other, net | 23,226 | 3,013 | 48,640 | 18,011 | ||||||||||||
Impairment of long-lived assets | 5,226 | — | 5,226 | — | ||||||||||||
Net gain from sale of real estate | (11,760 | ) | — | (11,760 | ) | (3,514 | ) | |||||||||
Total operating expenses | 613,153 | 597,587 | 1,219,916 | 1,220,736 | ||||||||||||
Operating Income | 37,595 | 63,368 | 59,812 | 105,199 | ||||||||||||
Other income (expense): | ||||||||||||||||
Interest expense | (38,245 | ) | (33,180 | ) | (74,362 | ) | (66,610 | ) | ||||||||
Loss on debt extinguishment and termination of derivative instruments | — | (110,682 | ) | — | (115,864 | ) | ||||||||||
Loss from investments in partially owned entities | (335 | ) | (1,034 | ) | (1,698 | ) | (1,983 | ) | ||||||||
Other, net | 5,775 | 14,623 | 7,071 | 24,149 | ||||||||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes | 4,790 | (66,905 | ) | (9,177 | ) | (55,109 | ) | |||||||||
Income tax (expense) benefit: | ||||||||||||||||
Current income tax | (1,995 | ) | (1,857 | ) | (3,928 | ) | (3,232 | ) | ||||||||
Deferred income tax | (1,245 | ) | 4,353 | (1,818 | ) | 3,734 | ||||||||||
Total income tax (expense) benefit | (3,240 | ) | 2,496 | (5,746 | ) | 502 | ||||||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | 1,550 | $ | (64,409 | ) | $ | (14,923 | ) | $ | (54,607 | ) | |||||
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests | 11 | (300 | ) | (82 | ) | (238 | ) | |||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to Americold Realty Trust, Inc. | $ | 1,539 | $ | (64,109 | ) | $ | (14,841 | ) | $ | (54,369 | ) | |||||
Weighted average common stock outstanding – basic | 285,604 | 284,683 | 285,484 | 284,664 | ||||||||||||
Weighted average common stock outstanding – diluted | 285,794 | 284,683 | 285,484 | 284,664 | ||||||||||||
Net income (loss) per common share - basic | $ | 0.01 | $ | (0.23 | ) | $ | (0.05 | ) | $ | (0.19 | ) | |||||
Net income (loss) per common share - diluted | $ | 0.01 | $ | (0.23 | ) | $ | (0.05 | ) | $ | (0.19 | ) |
Reconciliation of Net Income (Loss) to NAREIT FFO, Core FFO, and Adjusted FFO | ||||||||||||||||
(In thousands, except per share amounts) | ||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2025 | 2024 | 2025 | 2024 | |||||||||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | 1,550 | $ | (64,409 | ) | $ | (14,923 | ) | $ | (54,607 | ) | |||||
Adjustments: | ||||||||||||||||
Real estate related depreciation | 55,292 | 56,410 | 110,891 | 112,685 | ||||||||||||
Net gain from sale of real estate | (11,760 | ) | — | (11,760 | ) | (3,514 | ) | |||||||||
Net loss on real estate related asset disposals | — | 53 | 1 | 93 | ||||||||||||
Impairment charges on certain real estate assets | 3,739 | — | 3,739 | — | ||||||||||||
Our share of reconciling items related to partially owned entities | 279 | 418 | 494 | 566 | ||||||||||||
NAREIT FFO | $ | 49,100 | $ | (7,528 | ) | $ | 88,442 | $ | 55,223 | |||||||
Adjustments: | ||||||||||||||||
Net gain on sale of non-real assets | (163 | ) | (548 | ) | (29 | ) | (568 | ) | ||||||||
Acquisition, cyber incident, and other, net | 23,226 | 3,013 | 48,640 | 18,011 | ||||||||||||
Impairment of long-lived assets (excluding certain real estate assets) | 1,487 | — | 1,487 | — | ||||||||||||
Loss on debt extinguishment and termination of derivative instruments | — | 110,682 | — | 115,864 | ||||||||||||
Foreign currency exchange (gain) loss | (192 | ) | (11,321 | ) | 29 | (10,948 | ) | |||||||||
Gain on legal settlement related to prior period operations | — | — | — | (6,104 | ) | |||||||||||
Project Orion deferred costs amortization | 4,762 | 581 | 6,871 | 581 | ||||||||||||
Our share of reconciling items related to partially owned entities | 27 | 144 | 145 | 280 | ||||||||||||
Gain from sale of partially owned entity | (2,420 | ) | — | (2,420 | ) | — | ||||||||||
Core FFO | $ | 75,827 | $ | 95,023 | $ | 143,165 | $ | 172,339 | ||||||||
Adjustments: | ||||||||||||||||
Amortization of deferred financing costs and pension withdrawal liability | 1,523 | 1,294 | 2,923 | 2,583 | ||||||||||||
Amortization of below/above market leases | 363 | 360 | 714 | 728 | ||||||||||||
Straight-line rent adjustment | 77 | 367 | 161 | 956 | ||||||||||||
Deferred income tax expense (benefit) | 1,245 | (4,353 | ) | 1,818 | (3,734 | ) | ||||||||||
Stock-based compensation expense(1) | 6,594 | 6,064 | 13,853 | 12,683 | ||||||||||||
Non-real estate depreciation and amortization | 35,170 | 33,239 | 68,553 | 69,059 | ||||||||||||
Maintenance capital expenditures(2) | (17,283 | ) | (22,832 | ) | (32,082 | ) | (40,765 | ) | ||||||||
Our share of reconciling items related to partially owned entities | 71 | 235 | 208 | 461 | ||||||||||||
Adjusted FFO | $ | 103,587 | $ | 109,397 | $ | 199,313 | $ | 214,310 | ||||||||
(1) Stock-based compensation expense excludes any stock compensation expense associated with non-routine employee awards, which are recognized within Acquisition, cyber incident, and other, net. (2) Maintenance capital expenditures include capital expenditures made to extend the life of, and provide future economic benefit from, our existing temperature-controlled warehouse network and its existing supporting personal property and information technology. |
Reconciliation of Net Income (Loss) to NAREIT FFO, Core FFO, and Adjusted FFO (continued) | ||||||||||||||||
(In thousands, except per share amounts) | ||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2025 | 2024 | 2025 | 2024 | |||||||||||||
NAREIT FFO | $ | 49,100 | $ | (7,528 | ) | $ | 88,442 | $ | 55,223 | |||||||
Core FFO | $ | 75,827 | $ | 95,023 | $ | 143,165 | $ | 172,339 | ||||||||
Adjusted FFO | $ | 103,587 | $ | 109,397 | $ | 199,313 | $ | 214,310 | ||||||||
Reconciliation of weighted average shares: | ||||||||||||||||
Weighted average basic shares for net income calculation | 285,604 | 284,683 | 285,484 | 284,664 | ||||||||||||
Dilutive stock options and unvested restricted stock units | 190 | 327 | 228 | 280 | ||||||||||||
Weighted average dilutive shares | 285,794 | 285,010 | 285,712 | 284,944 | ||||||||||||
NAREIT FFO - basic per share | $ | 0.17 | $ | (0.03 | ) | $ | 0.31 | $ | 0.19 | |||||||
NAREIT FFO - diluted per share | $ | 0.17 | $ | (0.03 | ) | $ | 0.31 | $ | 0.19 | |||||||
Core FFO - basic per share | $ | 0.27 | $ | 0.33 | $ | 0.50 | $ | 0.61 | ||||||||
Core FFO - diluted per share | $ | 0.27 | $ | 0.33 | $ | 0.50 | $ | 0.60 | ||||||||
Adjusted FFO - basic per share | $ | 0.36 | $ | 0.38 | $ | 0.70 | $ | 0.75 | ||||||||
Adjusted FFO - diluted per share | $ | 0.36 | $ | 0.38 | $ | 0.70 | $ | 0.75 |
Reconciliation of Net Income (Loss) to NAREIT EBITDAre and Core EBITDA | ||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2025 | 2024 | 2025 | 2024 | |||||||||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | 1,550 | $ | (64,409 | ) | $ | (14,923 | ) | $ | (54,607 | ) | |||||
Adjustments: | ||||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 90,462 | 89,649 | 179,444 | 181,744 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense | 38,245 | 33,180 | 74,362 | 66,610 | ||||||||||||
Income tax expense (benefit) | 3,240 | (2,496 | ) | 5,746 | (502 | ) | ||||||||||
Net gain from sale of real estate | (11,760 | ) | — | (11,760 | ) | (3,514 | ) | |||||||||
Adjustment to reflect share of EBITDAre of partially owned entities | 976 | 1,520 | 2,492 | 2,990 | ||||||||||||
NAREIT EBITDAre | $ | 122,713 | $ | 57,444 | $ | 235,361 | $ | 192,721 | ||||||||
Adjustments: | ||||||||||||||||
Acquisition, cyber incident, and other, net | 23,226 | 3,013 | 48,640 | 18,011 | ||||||||||||
Loss from investments in partially owned entities | 335 | 1,034 | 1,698 | 1,983 | ||||||||||||
Impairment of long-lived assets | 5,226 | — | 5,226 | — | ||||||||||||
Foreign currency exchange (gain) loss | (192 | ) | (11,321 | ) | 29 | (10,948 | ) | |||||||||
Stock-based compensation expense(1) | 6,594 | 6,064 | 13,853 | 12,683 | ||||||||||||
Loss on debt extinguishment and termination of derivative instruments | — | 110,682 | — | 115,864 | ||||||||||||
Loss on other asset disposals | (163 | ) | (495 | ) | (28 | ) | (475 | ) | ||||||||
Gain on legal settlement related to prior period operations | — | — | — | (6,104 | ) | |||||||||||
Project Orion deferred costs amortization | 4,762 | 581 | 6,871 | 581 | ||||||||||||
Reduction in EBITDAre from partially owned entities | (976 | ) | (1,520 | ) | (2,492 | ) | (2,990 | ) | ||||||||
Gain from sale of partially owned entity | (2,420 | ) | — | (2,420 | ) | — | ||||||||||
Core EBITDA | $ | 159,105 | $ | 165,482 | $ | 306,738 | $ | 321,326 | ||||||||
Total revenues | $ | 650,748 | $ | 660,955 | $ | 1,279,728 | $ | 1,325,935 | ||||||||
Core EBITDA margin | 24.4 | % | 25.0 | % | 24.0 | % | 24.2 | % | ||||||||
(1) Stock-based compensation expense excludes any stock compensation expense associated with non-routine employee awards, which are recognized within Acquisition, cyber incident, and other, net. |
Revenues and Contribution (NOI) by Segment | ||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2025 | 2024 | 2025 | 2024 | |||||||||||||
Segment revenues: | ||||||||||||||||
Warehouse | $ | 594,070 | $ | 600,387 | $ | 1,169,427 | $ | 1,198,097 | ||||||||
Transportation | 48,097 | 50,637 | 92,090 | 107,490 | ||||||||||||
Third-party managed | 8,581 | 9,931 | 18,211 | 20,348 | ||||||||||||
Total revenues | 650,748 | 660,955 | 1,279,728 | 1,325,935 | ||||||||||||
Segment contribution: | ||||||||||||||||
Warehouse | 201,005 | 204,531 | 397,590 | 401,662 | ||||||||||||
Transportation | 8,742 | 8,850 | 15,996 | 20,372 | ||||||||||||
Third-party managed | 1,909 | 2,102 | 3,918 | 4,285 | ||||||||||||
Total segment contribution (NOI) | 211,656 | 215,483 | 417,504 | 426,319 | ||||||||||||
Reconciling items: | ||||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization expense | (90,462 | ) | (89,649 | ) | (179,444 | ) | (181,744 | ) | ||||||||
Selling, general, and administrative expense | (66,907 | ) | (59,453 | ) | (136,142 | ) | (124,879 | ) | ||||||||
Acquisition, cyber incident, and other, net | (23,226 | ) | (3,013 | ) | (48,640 | ) | (18,011 | ) | ||||||||
Impairment of long-lived assets | (5,226 | ) | — | (5,226 | ) | — | ||||||||||
Net gain from sale of real estate | 11,760 | — | 11,760 | 3,514 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense | (38,245 | ) | (33,180 | ) | (74,362 | ) | (66,610 | ) | ||||||||
Loss on debt extinguishment and termination of derivative instruments | — | (110,682 | ) | — | (115,864 | ) | ||||||||||
Loss from investments in partially owned entities | (335 | ) | (1,034 | ) | (1,698 | ) | (1,983 | ) | ||||||||
Other, net | 5,775 | 14,623 | 7,071 | 24,149 | ||||||||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes | $ | 4,790 | $ | (66,905 | ) | $ | (9,177 | ) | $ | (55,109 | ) |
We view and manage our business through three primary business segments—warehouse, transportation, and third-party managed. Our core business is our warehouse segment, where we provide temperature-controlled warehouse storage and related handling and other warehouse services. In our warehouse segment, we collect rent and storage fees from customers to store their frozen and perishable food and other products within our real estate portfolio. We also provide our customers with handling and other warehouse services related to the products stored in our buildings that are designed to optimize their movement through the cold chain, such as the placement of food products for storage and preservation, the retrieval of products from storage upon customer request, case-picking, blast freezing, produce grading and bagging, ripening, kitting, protein boxing, repackaging, e-commerce fulfillment, and other recurring handling services.
In our transportation segment, we broker and manage transportation of frozen and perishable food and other products for our customers. Our transportation services include consolidation services (i.e., consolidating a customer’s products with those of other customers for more efficient shipment), freight under management services (i.e., arranging for and overseeing transportation of customer inventory) and dedicated transportation services, each designed to improve efficiency and reduce transportation and logistics costs to our customers. We provide these transportation services at cost plus a service fee or, in the case of our consolidation or dedicated services, we may charge a fixed fee. We supplemented our regional, national and truckload consolidation services with the transportation operations from various warehouse acquisitions. We also provide multi-modal global freight forwarding services to support our customers’ needs in certain markets.
Under our third-party managed segment, we manage warehouses on behalf of third parties and provide warehouse management services to leading food manufacturers and retailers in their owned facilities. We believe using our third-party management services allows our customers to increase efficiency, reduce costs, reduce supply-chain risks and focus on their core businesses. We also believe that providing third-party management services allows us to offer a complete and integrated suite of services across the cold chain.
Notes and Definitions |
We use the following non-GAAP financial measures as supplemental performance measures of our business: NAREIT FFO, Core FFO, Adjusted FFO, NAREIT EBITDAre, Core EBITDA, Core EBITDA margin, net debt to pro-forma Core EBITDA, segment contribution (“NOI”) and margin, same store revenues and NOI, certain constant currency metrics, and maintenance capital expenditures. |
We calculate NAREIT funds from operations, or NAREIT FFO, in accordance with the standards established by the Board of Governors of the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts, or NAREIT. NAREIT defines FFO as net income or loss determined in accordance with U.S. GAAP, excluding extraordinary items as defined under U.S. GAAP and gains or losses from sales of previously depreciated operating real estate and other assets, plus specified non-cash items, such as real estate asset depreciation and amortization, impairment charges on real estate related assets, and our share of reconciling items for partially owned entities. We believe that NAREIT FFO is helpful to investors as a supplemental performance measure because it excludes the effect of real estate related depreciation, amortization and gains or losses from sales of real estate or real estate related assets, all of which are based on historical costs, which implicitly assumes that the value of real estate diminishes predictably over time. Since real estate values instead have historically risen or fallen with market conditions, NAREIT FFO can facilitate comparisons of operating performance between periods and among other equity REITs. |
We calculate core funds from operations, or Core FFO, as NAREIT FFO adjusted for the effects of Net gain on sale of non-real assets; Acquisition, cyber incident, and other, net; Impairment of long-lived assets (excluding certain real estate assets); Loss on debt extinguishment and termination of derivative instruments; Foreign currency exchange (gain) loss; Gain on legal settlement related to prior period operations; Project Orion deferred costs amortization; Our share of reconciling items related to partially owned entities; and Gain from sale of partially owned entity. We believe that Core FFO is helpful to investors as a supplemental performance measure because it excludes the effects of certain items which can create significant earnings volatility, but which do not directly relate to our core business operations. We believe Core FFO can facilitate comparisons of operating performance between periods, while also providing a more meaningful predictor of future earnings potential. |
However, because NAREIT FFO and Core FFO add back real estate depreciation and amortization and do not capture the level of maintenance capital expenditures necessary to maintain the operating performance of our properties, both of which have material economic impacts on our results from operations, we believe the utility of NAREIT FFO and Core FFO measures of our performance may be limited. |
We calculate adjusted funds from operations, or Adjusted FFO, as Core FFO adjusted for the effects of Amortization of deferred financing costs and pension withdrawal liability; Amortization of below/above market leases; Straight-line rent adjustment; Deferred income tax expense (benefit); Stock-based compensation expense; Non-real estate depreciation and amortization; Maintenance capital expenditures; and Our share of reconciling items related to partially owned entities. We believe that Adjusted FFO is helpful to investors as a meaningful supplemental comparative performance measure of our ability to make incremental capital investments in our business and to assess our ability to fund distribution requirements from our operating activities. |
NAREIT FFO, Core FFO and Adjusted FFO are used by management, investors and industry analysts as supplemental measures of operating performance of equity REITs. NAREIT FFO, Core FFO and Adjusted FFO should be evaluated along with U.S. GAAP net income and net income per diluted share (the most directly comparable U.S. GAAP measures) in evaluating our operating performance. NAREIT FFO, Core FFO and Adjusted FFO do not represent net income or cash flows from operating activities in accordance with U.S. GAAP and are not indicative of our results of operations or cash flows from operating activities as disclosed in our consolidated statements of operations included in our quarterly and annual reports. NAREIT FFO, Core FFO and Adjusted FFO should be considered as supplements, but not alternatives, to our net income or cash flows from operating activities as indicators of our operating performance. Moreover, other REITs may not calculate FFO in accordance with the NAREIT definition or may interpret the NAREIT definition differently than we do. Accordingly, our NAREIT FFO may not be comparable to FFO as calculated by other REITs. In addition, there is no industry definition of Core FFO or Adjusted FFO and, as a result, other REITs may also calculate Core FFO or Adjusted FFO, or other similarly-captioned metrics, in a manner different than we do. We reconcile NAREIT FFO, Core FFO and Adjusted FFO to Net income (loss), which is the most directly comparable financial measure calculated in accordance with U.S. GAAP. |
We calculate NAREIT EBITDA for Real Estate, or NAREIT EBITDAre, in accordance with the standards established by the Board of Governors of NAREIT, defined as, Net income (loss) before Depreciation and amortization; Interest expense; Income tax expense (benefit); Net gain from sale of real estate; and Adjustment to reflect share of EBITDAre of partially owned entities. NAREIT EBITDAre is a measure commonly used in our industry, and we present NAREIT EBITDAre to enhance investor understanding of our operating performance. We believe that NAREIT EBITDAre provides investors and analysts with a measure of operating results unaffected by differences in capital structures, capital investment cycles and useful life of related assets among otherwise comparable companies. |
We also calculate our Core EBITDA as NAREIT EBITDAre further adjusted for Acquisition, cyber incident, and other, net; Loss from investments in partially owned entities; Impairment of long-lived assets; Foreign currency exchange (gain) loss; Stock-based compensation expense; Loss on debt extinguishment and termination of derivative instruments; Loss on other asset disposals; Gain on legal settlement related to prior period operations; Project Orion deferred costs amortization; Reduction in EBITDAre from partially owned entities; and Gain from sale of partially owned entity. We believe that the presentation of Core EBITDA provides a measurement of our operations that is meaningful to investors because it excludes the effects of certain items that are otherwise included in NAREIT EBITDAre but which we do not believe are indicative of our core business operations. We calculate Core EBITDA margin as Core EBITDA divided by revenues. NAREIT EBITDAre and Core EBITDA are not measurements of financial performance or liquidity under U.S. GAAP, and our NAREIT EBITDAre and Core EBITDA may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of other companies. You should not consider our NAREIT EBITDAre and Core EBITDA as alternatives to net income or cash flows from operating activities determined in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Our calculations of NAREIT EBITDAre and Core EBITDA have limitations as analytical tools, including: |
|
Net debt to proforma Core EBITDA is calculated using total debt outstanding less cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash divided by pro-forma and/or Core EBITDA. If applicable, we calculate pro-forma Core EBITDA as Core EBITDA further adjusted for acquisitions. The pro-forma adjustment for acquisitions reflects the Core EBITDA for the period of time prior to acquisition. |
NOI is calculated as earnings/loss before interest expense, taxes, Depreciation and amortization, and excluding corporate Selling, general, and administrative expense; Acquisition, cyber incident, and other, net; Impairment of long-lived assets; Net gain from sale of real estate and all components of non-operating other income and expense. Management believes that this is a helpful metric to measure period to period operating performance of the business. |
We define our “same store” population once annually at the beginning of the current calendar year. Our population includes properties owned or leased for the entirety of two comparable periods with at least twelve consecutive months of normalized operations prior to January 1 of the current calendar year. We define “normalized operations” as properties that have been open for operation or lease, after development, expansion, or significant modification (e.g., rehabilitation subsequent to a natural disaster). Acquired properties are included in the “same store” population if owned by us as of the first business day of the prior calendar year (e.g. January 1, 2024) and are still owned by us as of the end of the current reporting period, unless the property is under development. The “same store” pool is also adjusted to remove properties that are being exited (e.g. non-renewal of warehouse lease or held for sale to third parties), were sold, or entered development subsequent to the beginning of the current calendar year. Changes in ownership structure (e.g., purchase of a previously leased warehouse) does not result in a facility being excluded from the same store population, as management believes that actively managing its real estate is normal course of operations. Additionally, management classifies new developments (both conventional and automated facilities) as a component of the same store pool once the facility is considered fully operational and both inbounding and outbounding product for at least twelve consecutive months prior to January 1 of the current calendar year. |
We calculate “same store revenues” as revenues for the same store population. We calculate “same store contribution (NOI)” as revenues for the same store population less its cost of operations (excluding any Depreciation and amortization, Impairment of long-lived assets, Selling, general, and administrative, Acquisition, cyber incident, and other, net and Net gain from sale of real estate). In order to derive an appropriate measure of period-to-period operating performance, we also calculate our same store contribution (NOI) on a constant currency basis to remove the effects of foreign currency exchange rate movements by using the comparable prior period exchange rate to translate from local currency into U.S. dollars for both periods. We evaluate the performance of the warehouses we own or lease using a “same store” analysis, and we believe that same store contribution (NOI) is helpful to investors as a supplemental performance measure because it includes the operating performance from the population of properties that is consistent from period to period and also on a constant currency basis, thereby eliminating the effects of changes in the composition of our warehouse portfolio and currency fluctuations on performance measures. Same store contribution (NOI) is not a measurement of financial performance under U.S. GAAP. In addition, other companies providing temperature-controlled warehouse storage and handling and other warehouse services may not define same store or calculate same store contribution (NOI) in a manner consistent with our definition or calculation. Same store contribution (NOI) should be considered as a supplement, but not as an alternative, to our results calculated in accordance with U.S. GAAP. |
We define “maintenance capital expenditures” as capital expenditures made to extend the life of, and provide future economic benefit from, our existing temperature-controlled warehouse network and its existing supporting personal property and information technology. Maintenance capital expenditures do not include acquisition costs contemplated when underwriting the purchase of a building or costs which are incurred to bring a building up to Americold’s operating standards. |
All quarterly amounts and non-GAAP disclosures within this filing shall be deemed unaudited. |
