4 in 5 Students Say AI Improved Their Academic Performance—But Only 20% of Universities Have a Formal AI Policy

Key Terms

ai-generated content technical

Content created automatically by computer programs that use artificial intelligence to write text, generate images, or produce audio and video rather than a human author. Investors care because this “robot-produced” material can speed up communications and cut costs, but it also raises risks around accuracy, disclosure, legal compliance and company credibility—similar to trusting automated bookkeeping versus a human review, errors or misleading claims can affect value and regulatory standing.

ai literacy technical

AI literacy is the ability to understand how artificial intelligence systems work, including their capabilities, limitations, and impact. For investors, it means being able to evaluate how AI-driven tools and technologies influence markets, business strategies, and decision-making processes. Being AI literate helps individuals make better-informed choices in a world increasingly shaped by intelligent machines.

plagiarism technical

Plagiarism is presenting someone else’s words, ideas, data or creative work as your own without proper credit. For investors it matters because copied or misrepresented material can signal ethical lapses, trigger legal or regulatory trouble, and distort the information investors rely on — like buying a product that claims false features compared with the original — which can damage reputation and value.

academic integrity regulatory

Academic integrity is the commitment to honest, transparent, and ethical conduct in research, reporting, and teaching—avoiding fabrication, falsification, plagiarism, or misleading presentation of results. For investors, it matters because trust in scientific findings, trial outcomes, or scholarly claims affects an organization’s credibility, regulatory risk and long-term value—like relying on a trusted recipe or referee whose honesty determines whether the result can be believed.

academic integrity tools technical

Software and services that detect plagiarism, verify authorship, monitor exams, and enforce rules around research and academic work; they act like security alarms and ID checks for schools, journals and online courses. Investors care because these tools protect institutional reputation, reduce legal and regulatory risk, and create recurring revenue streams for vendors — breaches or improvements can respectively hurt or boost customer trust, compliance costs, and sales.

New Coursera report shows half of U.S. higher education institutions are unprepared to manage AI

• 78% of U.S. students and educators say AI is having a positive impact on higher education
• 50% believe the U.S. higher education system is unprepared to manage AI

MOUNTAIN VIEW, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)-- AI adoption is widespread among U.S. university students and educators, yet half believe higher education is not fully prepared to manage its impact, according to a new survey released today by Coursera (NYSE: COUR), a leading global online learning platform.

The AI in Higher Education Report, based on responses from more than 4,200 university students and educators across the United States, United Kingdom, India, Mexico, and Saudi Arabia, found that nearly all students and educators use AI to facilitate personalized training, provide real-time feedback, and increase productivity and efficiency.

“AI is delivering real benefits on campus, yet many institutions are still working to keep pace,” said Marni Baker Stein, Chief Content Officer at Coursera. “With only a small share of U.S. universities reporting a formal AI policy, there’s a clear need for stronger governance, faculty training, and thoughtful implementation. When we build confidence alongside capability, we can ensure AI truly expands opportunity for every learner.”

AI adoption on U.S. campuses shows that:

• 78% of educators and students feel positive about AI’s impact on higher education, compared to 81% globally
• 14% say it is having a negative impact, slightly higher than the 9% average across countries surveyed
• 7% of students report not using AI at all, compared to 3% globally
• 20% of educators report that their university has a formal AI policy in place
• Half believe the higher education system is unprepared to handle AI

Globally, survey findings show:

• 70% believe AI will improve exam performance and the overall quality of higher education
• 63% of students say they use AI for less than half of their academic tasks, and only 5% use AI for more than 80% of their work
• 80% of students say AI has positively supported their learning experience

Academic Integrity and Governance

Concerns remain around academic integrity and degree credibility. Across markets, 65% believe unregulated AI could undermine degree credibility, and 37% worry it will increase plagiarism. Students report heightened concern about cheating, with 40% viewing AI-related cheating as a significant threat.

Confidence among educators also appears limited. Only 27% of educators say they feel confident identifying AI-generated content, and just 25% believe they and their peers have the skills needed to use AI effectively.

The report also highlights governance and literacy gaps. Globally, 56% of students and educators believe their higher education system is unprepared to manage AI. Just 28% of educators say AI literacy has been incorporated into the curriculum. Additionally, 24% of students surveyed admit to submitting AI-generated work without disclosure.

Additional Global Findings

• 95% of students and educators report using AI tools in their academic work
• 37% worry AI may reduce human interaction and erode interpersonal skills
• 53% of university students in India say AI positively impacts their studies
• 91% of students and educators in Saudi Arabia report a positive overall impact
• 69% of Mexican students say AI has improved their grades

As AI becomes embedded in higher education, institutions should prioritize faculty upskilling and clear governance, consistently and transparently communicated, to ensure responsible and effective adoption. Other report recommendations include:

• Integrating AI literacy into professional development
• Equipping educators with practical AI skills
• Establishing transparent policies that guide appropriate use in teaching, assessment, and research

By grounding decisions in research, fostering human collaboration, and creating structured guidance for both faculty and students, universities can build confidence, protect academic standards, and harness AI to strengthen learning outcomes.

As a global online learning platform, Coursera offers a range of solutions to empower faculty as they navigate AI in the classroom, including Academic Integrity tools that have promoted robust learning across over 13 million course completions; and a range of courses from leading universities designed to support faculty engagement, including Generative AI for Educators & Teachers from Vanderbilt University and AI in Education: Leveraging ChatGPT for Teaching from The Wharton School, in collaboration with OpenAI.

To learn more, download the full report here.

About Coursera

Coursera was launched in 2012 by Andrew Ng and Daphne Koller with a mission to provide universal access to world-class learning. Today, it is one of the largest online learning platforms in the world, with 197 million registered learners as of December 31, 2025. Coursera partners with over 375+ leading university and industry partners to offer a broad catalog of content and credentials, including courses, Specializations, Professional Certificates, and degrees. Coursera’s platform innovations — including generative AI-powered features like Coach, Role Play, and Course Builder, and role-based solutions like Skills Tracks — enable instructors, partners, and companies to deliver scalable, personalized, and verified learning. Institutions worldwide rely on Coursera to upskill and reskill their employees, students, and citizens in high-demand fields such as GenAI, data science, technology, and business, while learners globally turn to Coursera to master the skills they need to advance their careers. Coursera is a Delaware public benefit corporation and a B Corp.

Methodology

This research was commissioned by Coursera and conducted by Censuswide. The survey included 4,261 university educators (professors, lecturers, and seminar or discussion leaders) and university students aged 18 and older across the United States, United Kingdom, India, Mexico, and Saudi Arabia.

Data was collected between October 15 and October 23, 2025 through an online survey. Percentages have been rounded to the nearest whole number for clarity.

Censuswide abides by and employs members of the Market Research Society and follows the MRS Code of Conduct and ESOMAR principles.

View source version on businesswire.com: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20260225650802/en/

For media: Arunav Sinha, press@coursera.org

Source: Coursera